+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: moral
View: 46 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs. V. BAIAMONTE and C.-F. CHIASSERINI Supported by the Italian Ministry of University Mobile Networks and Applications 11, 287–296, 2006. Outline. Introduction The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme The EDA technique Numerical results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
28
Saving Energy during C hannel Contention in 8 02.11 WLANs V. BAIAMONTE and C.-F. CHIASSERINI Supported by the Italian Ministry of University Mobile Networks and Applications 11, 287–296, 2006
Transcript
Page 1: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

V. BAIAMONTE and C.-F. CHIASSERINISupported by the Italian Ministry of University

Mobile Networks and Applications 11, 287–296, 2006

Page 2: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Outline

• Introduction

• The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme

• The EDA technique

• Numerical results

• Conclusions

Page 3: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Introduction

• Energy consumption is a critical issues.

• Various operational states• Transmitting/receiving,

• Overhearing/idling, and dozing.

• Other operational states

Page 4: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Introduction

• Distributed Coordination Function (DCF), is based on the CSMA/CA mechanism.

• A amount of time in idling/overhearing.

Page 5: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Introduction

• PSM: switch to dozing when does not have any data to transmit/receive.

• Drawback: a delay in traffic service leads to a severe Quality of Service (QoS) degradation.

Page 6: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Introduction

• Aims at while a WLAN card is involved in channel contention.

• At MAC layer, called the Energy-efficient Distributed Access (EDA) scheme.

Page 7: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme

• The DCF exploits both a physical and a virtual channel sensing.

• Overhearing a transmission can set their NAV (Network Allocation Vector).

Page 8: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme

• If physical or virtual carrier sense detects the channel as busy, then waits to become idle.– DIFS (or EIFS if the previous frame was receiv

ed in error)

Page 9: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme

• By using the NAV, operations are not interrupted.– RTS/CTS or data transmission

• SIFS

Page 10: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The IEEE 802.11b standard access scheme

Page 11: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

• First: convert the time in overhearing into a low-power state, namely the idling state.

• Second: degradation traffic delivery delay

Page 12: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

• Slightly modifying two aspects of the DCF protocol: – (i) the virtual sensing mechanism and – (ii) the backoff procedure.

• All other mechanisms are unchanged

Page 13: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

• Case1: NAV=0 and channel as idle.– behaves as in the standard DCF

• Case2: NAV=0 but channel is busy.– Sets its NAV accordingly and enters the low-po

wer state.

• Case3: NAV>0– Senses the channel for DIFS and draws a backo

ff value.

Page 14: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

• While backoff > 0, stay in low-power mode regardless of the channel state.– cannot overhear– cannot set its NAV. – The backoff counter continues till it reaches zer

o.

Page 15: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

• While backoff = 0, the WSTA does not immediately transmit. It listens to the channel for PIFS.– If the channel is idle, it transmits and ends the c

urrent channel contention;

– Otherwise, the WSTA doubles its CW size and draws a new backoff value.

Page 16: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

The EDA technique

Page 17: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 18: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 19: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

• The average energy consumption per successful packet.

• The throughput fairness.

• As fairness, we use Jain’s index

Page 20: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 21: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 22: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 23: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 24: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 25: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 26: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 27: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Numerical results

Page 28: Saving Energy during Channel Contention in 802.11 WLANs

Conclusions

• Enable to be in low-power mode while activity and contends for the channel.

• Allow to save energy without degradation of the QoS performance.

• Energy saving as large as 80% and 28% under UDP and TCP traffic.


Recommended