Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | erica-young |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Scaling properties of multiplicity fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions simulated by AMPT model
Yi-Long Xie
China University of Geosciences, Wuhan
( Xie Yi-Long, Chen Gang , et al , Nucl. Phys. A 920 (2013) 33–44 )
Content
• Nonlinear Dynamics
• AMPT model
• Results of NFM Analysis
• Discussion of FM’s Scaling
• Summary
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
1. Nonlinear Dynamics
Big local fluctuation implied dynamical factors.
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Bialas : describe the fluctuation with NFM as follow:
M
mq
m
mmmq
n
qnnn
MMF
1
111
1. Nonlinear Dynamics
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Self-similar Fractal Self-affine Fractal
Criterion for existence of fractal qMMFq
1. Nonlinear Dynamics
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Characterize of Self-similar Fractal:
Characterize of Self-affine Fractal
Isotropic partition the phase-space
Anisotropic partition the phase-space with calculated Hurst exponent
Fitting the 1-d NFM with saturation exponents
1 ln
1 lnj i
iji j
H
( ) iq i i i iF M A BM
Calculate the Hurst exponent with saturation exponent
Wu Y F, Liu L S. Phys Rev Lett, 1993, 70(21):3197-3200
collision at region
1. Nonlinear Dynamics
Self-similar Fractal
0Z
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Self-affine Fractal
Hadron collision
Agababyan N M, Atayan M R, Charlet M, et al. Phys Lett B, 1996, 382(3):305-311
Abreu P, Adam W, Adye T, et al. Nucl Phys B, 1992, 386(2):471-492
ee
The final state system in collisions at region is self-affine fractal
1. Nonlinear Dynamics
0Zee
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
The final state system in hadron collisions is self-affine fractal
Does fractal exist in heavy ion collisions?
Which kind of fractal?
Experiments has shown that:
So:
A Pictorial View of Micro-Bangs at RHIC:
1. Initial Condition 2. Partonic Cascade 3. Hadronization 4. Hadronic Rescattering
2 AMPT model
2 AMPT model
(a) AMPT v1.11 (Default) (b) AMPT v2.11 (String Melting)
3.1 Results of NFM Analysis
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
ty p
Tab.1. Fitting parameters for 1-D NFM (q=2).
1. 1-D NFM tends to saturate
2. Saturation exponents:
3. Identical Hurst exponents:
Fig.1. 1-D NFM: (q=2).MF 2
3.2 Results of NFM Analysis
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Fig.2. The logarithm distribution of 2-D NFM, i.e.
Fitting formula :
Show good Scaling Conclusion: Self-Similar Fractal
)92( lnln qMFq
3.3 Results of NFM Analysis
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
1. Fitting Formula:
Same Conclusion: Scaling Feature and Self-similar Fractal
Fig.3. The logarithm distribution
of 3-D NFM:
Tab.2. Fitting parameter for 3-D NFM Tab.3. Effect Fluctuation Strength
2. Fluctuation in heavy ion collision is larger than those in hadron collisions and collisions.
Effect Fluctuation Strength:
QGP
ee
MFq lnln
4. Discussion of FM’s Scaling
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Scaling property is checked again.
Fig.4. The distribution of 3-D NFM: Fig.5. Parameter are obtained when fitting the
relation:
1. .2.
2lnln FFq qvsq . )( 2q
2lnln FcFq )1( qq
1.3040.131.86ν tpy
Fitting Formula:
Fitting Formula:
DD 32
Not phase transition in AMPT.
RudophC. Hwa, M. T. Nazirov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1741.
4. Discussion of FM’s Scaling
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Fig.6. The loglog distribution of 2-D NFM in the plane at various intervals
qF ),( y tp
1. Expectation:
2. Indeed, Fluctuation with tp
)()( 5.4,5.30.1,5.0 tt pp
3. Due to the limited events, quantitative analysis can’t be made.
4. Discussion of FM’s Scaling
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
Fig.7. The distribution of 2-D NFM as a
function of , with partition number M=1
),(ln yfq
tp
),( yfq tp rapidly with .
Fluctuation in high is actually much larger than that in low .tp
tp
2D FM on plane(M=1):
qm
mmmq
n
qnnnyf
)1()1(),(
),( y
5 Summary
Chin
a U
niv
ersity
of G
eoscie
nce
s Sch
ool o
f math
em
atics a
nd
ph
ysics
1. With the data of Au-Au collision events at 200Gev generated by AMPT model, the 1-D NFM is obtained. The obtained Hurst exponent approximately equal to 1 within the error range.
2. Partitioning the phase-space according to Hurst exponent, then calculate the 2-D and 3-D NFMs. They both show good scaling, which means the final state system is self-similar fractal.
3. According to the calculated effect fluctuation strengths, the fluctuation in heavy ion collisions is found to be much smaller than those in hadron-hadron collisions and electron-positron collisions, which may be the signal of QGP.
4. When checking the scaling property again, the parameter can be obtained. Our results is larger than v =1.304 derived in Ginzburg-Landau type of phase transition. AMPT does not include the phase transition.
5. Splitting the pt range into smaller intervals, the in high is expected to be larger than that in low . Due to the limited events, quantitative analysis can’t be made. But if considering the 2D FM on (M=1), we actually see the increasing of fluctuation with the increasing of pt.
13.086.1 tpy
tptp
),( y
Thank you !