Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mary-stokes |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Science, Language, and Imagination in the Development
of Effective Reading Teachers
Louisa C. Moats, Ed.D.
October 26, 2005
3 Questions Often Asked Why all this money, time, and
expertise necessary for professional development?
What kinds of interventions are most successful? (and who do I trust to tell me)
Why should I get involved in instructional leadership?
First, Some Basic Facts About Literacy…
Early prediction is possible
Early intervention is more effective than later intervention
Language proficiency is the major correlate of reading and writing
Multiple Causes of Reading Difficulty…Multiple Causes of Reading Difficulty…
readingfailure
limitedexperiencewith books
dyslexiaor other
LD
Englishas a second
language
inadequateinstruction
cognitive orlanguagedeficits
Four Language Processing Systems
Context Processor
Orthographic Processor
Phonological Processor
Meaning Processor
writing outputspeech output reading input
Phonemic Awareness
Fluency
Phonics
Language Comprehension
Vocabulary
Reading Trajectories Are Established Early
The ScienceOf Professional Development
of Teachers of Reading
Teacher Preparation Issues ?
“…Many teachers in general education and special education are not well prepared to provide research-based instruction, especially in the area of reading (Lyon et al., 2001)…inadequate preparation in all components of reading instruction in preservice programs and inadequate understanding of concepts involving phonological awareness and the structure of language.” Fletcher, 2004
Research on Teacher Knowledge and Teaching Reading
Moats & Foorman, 2003Spear-Swerling and Brucker,
2003, 2004Bos et al., 2001McCutchen et al., 2001A. Cunningham, 2004Spear-Swerling et al., in pressCornier, 2004
Spear-Swerling and Brucker “Six hours of course instruction in word
structure apparently was not sufficient for all student teachers to perform at high levels.”
“Even periods of instruction much longer…may not yield perfect performance at post-test.”
Children’s progress was consistent with teachers’ word-structure knowledge.
Spear-Swerling, continued.Teachers learned from course work, not
from teaching itself.There is a disciplinary knowledge base that
cannot be “discovered” incidentally by most teachers.
Thus, experienced teachers often do not know any more than the inexperienced about language and word structure, or about reading research.
A. Cunningham et al.
700-800 teachers in Oakland were much better at estimating their knowledge of children’s literature than they were at estimating their knowledge of language structure. Those who thought they knew less about language structure (phonics) actually knew more; those who thought they knew more, knew less.
Annals of Dyslexia, 2004
Steiner’s review of courses:61 course syllabi reviewed (2004)Only 4 referred to NRP or NRC reportsWhole language assessments
predominatedOnly 3 schools required a course in
language structureMost courses taught “balanced literacy”
and retained whole language orientation
CCTC - 2002
Reading Program Review StudyOf 20 programs reviewed, more than
half were lacking instruction in state’s standards, assessments, and approaches required in Reading First
Textbooks taught that all methods were equally valuable; did not emphasize and select evidence-based programs
Why is So Much PD Required?
Teachers did not receive sufficient training in licensing program even if the best practices were emphasized
AND/ORTraining did not emphasize the
programs or program components or research basis that drives Reading First
Unsupported (non-SBRR) theories and practices were taught
Languageand Professional
Development of Teachers of Reading
What About “5 Essential Components” of Reading?
Phoneme AwarenessPhonicsFluencyVocabularyComprehension
- Reading First
Students Must Learn All Aspects of Language
Speech sounds and word structure
Printed symbolsVocabularySentence structureParagraphsOverall text structure
Current Research Findings
1. Language systems are interdependent, so improvement in one system supports improvement in others
2. Proficiencies are gained in parallel, although each one is gained in sequence
ExamplesSpelling predicts reading
comprehension as well as or better than word attack (Mehta et al., 2005, SSR)
Phonological processing is a factor in vocabulary development
Teacher Knowledge Surveys…
Identifying phonemes, syllables, morphemes
Defining basic terms Understanding the
relationship between word recognition, fluency, and comprehension
Interpreting student work samples (oral reading, spelling and writing)
Sentence Structure: What’s True?
A sentence is constructed with a subject and a predicate.
A sentence begins with a capital and ends with a period.
Syllable counting, teachers grades K-2 (n=50)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
walked spoil shirt
accurate
overunder
Phoneme counting, teachers of grades K-2 (n=50)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
sawed know shrimp
% accurate
underover
Phoneme Matching, n=53
Find a word that ends with the same sound: dogs: miss, has, decks, niece coached: trapped, screamed, twisted,
filled
(47% and 55% correct respectively)
Awareness of Syllable Spellings
The second “m” in “moment” is NOT doubled because:A) the first vowel is shortB) the first vowel is longC) the second vowel is a schwaD) the first syllable is stressed
(51% correct)
Let’s Get Specific: What Do Teachers Need to Be Taught?
Differentiation of speech sounds from letters
First sound in “one” or “sure”?
Phoneme identity and pronunciation- // /j/
Knowing the functional spelling units:rifle - riffle wage - badge
What Teachers Need to Be Taught (2)
Parts of speech.
Syntax and how to describe it.
Aspects of text organization and genre.
The classic direct instruction process: “I do, we do, you do.”
What Teachers Need to Be Taught (3)
How to use the instructional materials
How to link the various levels of language organization
How to assess in ways that inform instruction
q u ee n
Where We Must Begin
Understanding that speech is made up of phonemes,
/k/ /w/ /e/ /n/
and matching phonemes to graphemes.
Where We Are Going…
Word structure, word meaning, word relationships:
pro-ject re-ject
sub-ject in-ject
To Language Comprehension
figurative languagemultiple meaningsacademic language formalitiesdiscourse structurephrase structure in sentences topic-specific terminology
What kinds of interventions are most successful? (and who do I trust to tell me)
SBRR – Key Sources Florida Center for Reading Research
(www.FCRR.org) Society for the Scientific Study of Reading American Psychological Society Texas Centers – Austin and Houston University of Oregon National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development Institute for Education Sciences
NICHD Early Interventions Project, 1997-2001
Barbara Foorman, Principal Investigator9 schools in DC and 8 schools in Houston1600 children, followed from Kindergarten
or 1st to 4th grade4 reading programs involvedGoal to improve reading achievement
Results Overall
Students in sample began at levels below the 20th %ile on early screening (TPRI); vocabulary scores were at 5th and 17%iles
Through 4th grade, students scored at or above the national average (between 50th and 65th %ile) on reading outcome measures, including comprehension (WJR)
Results Overall, continued.
Writing skills were significantly below average by grade 3; spelling was much lower than reading;
Writing was not being taught at all in 1/3 of the classrooms
The quality of writing instruction did have a measurable effect on length of composition
Results Consistent With Consensus Recommendations on Research-based Reading Instruction (NRP, etc.)
Students benefit from direct, systematic, explicit teaching of phonology, letter recognition, sound-symbol correspondence, sight word recognition, vocabulary, and comprehension as they are building a foundation for fluent reading
Five Important Conditions for Success
1. Strong leadership
2. Content-rich, sustained professional development
3. In-class coaching
4. Core, comprehensive program
5. Assessment for screening and progress-monitoring (TPRI)
What the Teachers Told Us
50 teachers who had had two or more years in the DC project were interviewed by a former president of the local teachers’ union. Interviews were taped and transcribed; teachers’ identities were fully protected.
Interviews, continued.49/50 teachers were “positive” to “extremely
positive” about participatingReasons Cited:
obvious, immediate student improvement greater insight into reading development help determining priorities and goals (no one
advocated more “choice” or “creativity”) material support learning with colleagues in supportive context;
opportunity to practice and receive coaching
Why should I get involved in instructional leadership?
To Provide a Supportive ContextUnderstand and give the time needed
for teachers to master various components
Evaluate in ways that are consistent with what teachers are learning to do
Foster collaboration and teamwork across disciplines and roles
To Lead Toward Sound Theories and Scientifically-grounded Practices
Ungrounded ideas that infect education:
Cueing systemsLearning stylesBrain-based learningMultiple intelligencesStructure of the junctions between the
functions
To Set Expectations for What Any Teacher Should Know
How children learn to read Why some children fail to learn to read well
(and how to identify them)How written English is structuredHow to teach most effectively (guided by
research)How to use a specific set of materials
Imaginationand Professional
Development of Teachers of Reading
Personal goal setting
Story-telling
Humor
Unusual collaborations
Role play
Observation
Question-generation
Art and music
Make time for…
References Moats L.C. & Foorman, B.R. (2003). Measuring
teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23-45.
Moats, LC (2004) Science, language, and imagination… In McCardle and Chhabra, Voices of evidence in reading research. Brookes Publishing.
Foorman, B.R., & Moats, L.C. (2004). Conditions for sustaining research-based practices in early reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 25 (1), 51-60.
Foorman, B. (Ed.) 2003. Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale. Baltimore: York Press.