Scott County Schools
2014 – 2015 Review
Agenda Policy 5.23 – Energy Management Energy Management Strategy Avoided Cost Summary Monthly Measurements Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings Energy Management Goals Energy Star Awards/Monthly Energy Reduction Award Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s) Commercial Demand Conservation Program National Building Competition Woodford County Schools Support Summary Overall Scott County Schools Summary
School Board Policy 05.23 - Energy Management
It is the intent of the Board that the District use energy resources in a safe and efficient manner with an on-goingfocus on identifying and implementing cost saving measures and developing staff and student commitment to identifiedenergy management practices.
To promote this effort, the Superintendent/designee shall direct the development of an energy management plan(EMP) for Board approval and oversee the implementation and maintenance of that plan, which shall address thefollowing components:
1. A District level committee shall be appointed by the Superintendent/designee to develop and implement the energymanagement plan (EMP).
2. The District level committee shall track and monitor the EMP to determine progress toward managing and reducingenergy costs.
3. Effective with the 2011-2012 school year, the Superintendent/designee shall report the EMP results for each fiscalyear, including annual District energy usage, costs and anticipated savings to KPPC - the Kentucky PollutionPrevention Center – by October 1st annually through the Kentucky Energy Efficiency Program for Schools (KEEPS).
A status report on implementation of the plan in Board-owned andBoard-operated facilities shall be provided to the Board following theend of each fiscal year.
Energy Management Strategy Support District Vision Statement “To Create a
Collaborative Culture to Ensure Student Learning”
We collaborate with the District Energy Team, the School Energy Teams having community partners and with the Student Energy Teams
Projects have improved the learning environment
Focused on no cost/low cost projects first
Completed large projects: HVAC Control Projects at Western/Northern/SCHS and LED Lighting Projects at SCHS/9th Grade/Garth
Energy Management Avoided Costs SummaryProject Description Refunds/Rebates
ReceivedAvoided
CostsTotal Avoided
Costs
Rate Change Savings Prior Years
$142,420 (Refunds) $784,096 $926,516
Rate Change Savings Current Year
$199,363 $199,363
Consumption Savings Prior Years
$798,160 $798,160
Consumption Savings Current Year
$346,722 $346,722
Energy ProjectsPrior Years
$60, 171 (Rebates, Credits & Refunds)
$60,171
Energy ProjectsCurrent Year
$3,060 (Rebates, Credits & Refunds)
$3,060
Total $205,651 $2,128,341 $2,333,992
School Facility
2014
Actual
Kwh
2015
Actual
Kwh
%
Reduction Position
$ Cost
Change
2013-14
Actual Kwh
2014-15
Actual Kwh
%
Reduction
Overall
Position
YTD $ Cost
Change
GMS 58,400 54,040 7.5% 5 -$401 1,057,200 1,055,080 0.2% 14 -$182
RSMS 77,080 74,160 3.8% 9 -$268 1,215,840 1,271,200 -4.6% 17 $4,753
AME 73,316 58,060 20.8% 1 -$1,403 982,539 931,666 5.2% 6 -$4,367
Eastern 27,181 22,402 17.6% 2 -$439 517,031 462,757 10.5% 3 -$4,659
Garth 68,331 59,542 12.9% 4 -$808 702,431 649,422 7.5% 4 -$4,551
Northern 41,200 34,000 17.5% 3 -$662 622,800 513,200 17.6% 1 -$9,409
Southern 48,480 45,440 6.3% 7 -$279 789,440 776,960 1.6% 11 -$1,071
Stamping Ground 42,960 43,120 -0.4% 11 $15 577,040 556,270 3.6% 8 -$1,783
Western 55,200 66,800 -21.0% 17 $1,066 971,600 924,400 4.9% 7 -$4,052
Central Office/Misc 54,912 58,975 -7.4% 13 $374 777,328 751,434 3.3% 9 -$2,223
Preschool 15,941 15,627 2.0% 10 -$29 274,827 266,633 3.0% 10 -$703
SCHS 183,274 170,053 7.2% 6 -$1,215 3,065,514 2,674,873 12.7% 2 -$33,537
SCMS 55,920 62,400 -11.6% 15 $596 1,087,680 1,080,000 0.7% 12 -$659
ATC 4,248 4,022 5.3% 8 -$21 147,306 146,641 0.5% 13 -$57
9th Grade/Cardinal Acad. 36,000 40,800 -13.3% 16 $441 566,400 590,160 -4.2% 16 $2,040
ECS 39,200 40,800 -4.1% 12 $147 560,400 568,400 -1.4% 15 $687
Lemons Mill 43,615 47,616 -9.2% 14 $368 1,000,531 929,711 7.1% 5 -$6,080
Total 925,258 897,857 3.0% -$2,519 14,915,907 14,148,807 5.1% -$65,856
Scott County Schools
Energy Management Report
June 2015
2014 - 2015 YTD ResultsJune
Electrical Energy Cost Comparison to Last Year
-$70,000
-$60,000
-$50,000
-$40,000
-$30,000
-$20,000
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
July 2014 - June 2015 $ Cost Change
Note: The Schools with the Lowest Bars are doing the Best Job in Reducing Costs
Rating Rating Energy Use
(1-100) (1-100) Change From kbtu/sq ft Energy
June-15 June-10 Baseline(%) June-15 Star
Lemons Mill Elementary 96 93 -9.6% 28.3 Yes
Stamping Ground Elementary 95 91 -8.4% 34.0 Yes
Eastern Elementary 95 80 -29.4% 32.2 Yes
Elkhorn Crossing School 94 82 -16.5% 28.9 Yes
Southern Elementary 94 81 -23.7% 30.6 Yes
Royal Spring Middle School 93 74 -27.8% 28.3 Yes
Garth Elementary 91 87 -20.5% 33.4 Yes
SCHS/9th Grade/SCMS Campus 88 69 -21.7% 45.9 Yes
Northern Elementary 87 33 -44.6% 37.3 Yes
Georgetown Middle School 84 77 -12.0% 36.5 Yes
Western Elementary 81 48 -29.2% 37.8 Yes
Anne Mason Elementary 79 53 -24.9% 38.0 Yes
Preschool N/A N/A -13.6% 42.1 N/A
Central Office/Misc N/A N/A 8.2% 90.0 N/A
Group Total 90 71 -20.4% 39.1
Facility Name
Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings
96 95 95 94 94 9391
88 8784
8179
9391
8082 81
74
87
69
33
77
48
53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100June-15
June-10
Energy Star
Energy Star Portfolio Manager Rating
28
3432
2931
28
33
46
37 37 38 38
31
37
46
35
40 3942
59
67
42
5351
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
June-15
June-10
EUI (kbtu/sq.ft/)
Energy Management Goals Status
Achieved all three of our goals:
Achieve over $2.0 million in total avoid cost – Actual $2.3M
Achieve 3% year to year reduction – Actual 5.1%
All schools earned Energy Star Award which requires a 75 rating
Energy Star Awards Stamping Ground – 2008/2011/2012/2013/2014 Southern – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 Eastern – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 RSMS – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 Garth – 2010/2011/2012/2013/2014 GMS – 2011/2012/2013/2014 ECS – 2011/2012/2013/2014 Northern – 2012/2013/2014 AME – 2012/2013/2014 SCHS/SCMS/9th Grade/Cardinal Academy – 2012/2013/2014 Western – 2014 Lemons Mill - 2014 District – Top Performer for 2012 District – Energy Star Partner of the Year – 2013/2015 GMS – Green Ribbon School Award – 2012 Northern – Green Ribbon School Award – 2013 RSMS – Green Ribbons School Award - 2015
2014 - 2015 Energy Reduction Award Winners
Northern = July, August, September, October, November, February, April & May (8 Times)
Lemons Mill = December & January (2 Times)
Eastern = March
Anne Mason = June
Energy Reduction Award Winners
Summary of Winners Since November 2009 Northern – 15 Times
RSMS – 8 Times
Southern/SCHS/SCMS/AME – 7 Times Each
Eastern Elementary – 6 Times
Georgetown Middle School – 3 Times
Western/Preschool/LME – 2 Times Each
Stamping Ground/ECS – 1 Time Each
Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s)
LED Lighting for SCHS Back Parking Lot – Complete
LED Lighting for SCHS Lights on 24/7 – Complete
Replace light fixtures requiring repair with LED’s
Metal halide wall packs
CFL recessed light fixtures
Dark campus during summer months for schools
Near Term Energy Conservation Measures
Continue installing LED Retrofit Kit in T8 2’x4’ lights at SCHS using available funding from rebates/other
Improve building envelope with new windows at C.O.
Start replacing 400 watt metal halide outside lights
Outside LED with sensors that replace 400 watt metal halide – Good payback
Install occupancy sensors in large bathrooms in district – SCHS first priority (less than 8 year payback)
Long Term Energy Conservation Measures
Complete T8 conversion at SCHS to LED’s
Replace Outside Metal Halide (MH) lights with LED’s
Replace MH Lights in AME & SGE gyms with LED’s
Replace CFL Sports Lights at Southern & Middle School gyms with LED’s
Extend HVAC Control System to Eastern Elementary
Improve Building Envelope with New Windows at Garth/SCMS/9th Grade
Replace Window Air Conditioners at SCMS & 9th
Grade by upgrading HVAC system
Commercial Demand Conservation Program
Managed by ENERNOC for Kentucky Utilities
Four year term with potential of $24,000 per year
Impacts June – September after students leave
Manage demand using HVAC control system
Recommend using any funds for energy projects
Free real time meters have been installed
Help ensure reliable energy for our community
Real time data helps manage energy usage
Approved at April school board agenda
Scott County High School
Northern Elementary
2013 2014 2014 Rank for
Source Source Change From Kentucky
Energy Use Energy Use 2013(%) Buildings
SCHS/9th Grade/SCMS Campus 133.9 119.4 -10.8% 4
Western Elementary 135.9 124.3 -8.5% 7
Northern Elementary 131.8 127.4 -3.3% 33
Preschool 101.6 98.5 -3.1% 37
Southern Elementary 98.3 96.4 -1.9% 47
Eastern Elementary 109.2 107.3 -1.7% 51
Royal Spring Middle School 85.7 85.9 0.2% 89
Stamping Ground Elementary 108.3 109.8 1.4% 106
Garth Elementary 106.4 108.3 1.8% 115
Elkhorn Crossing School 87.1 90.2 3.6% 133
Anne Mason Elementary 119.5 125.9 5.4% 138
Georgetown Middle School 109.5 117.2 7.0% 147
Total District -4.2% 43
*
Facility Name
Scott County Schools Ranked 43rd in the Nation for Teams
National Building Competition
2013 2014 2014 Rank for
Source Source Change From Kentucky
Energy Use Energy Use 2013(%) Buildings
Simmons Elementary 155.5 128.8 -17.2% 1
Woodford County High School 163.9 141.6 -13.6% 2
Woodford County Central Office 138.2 122.5 -11.4% 3
Southside Elementary 150.6 137.2 -8.9% 6
Huntertown Elementary 125.5 115.3 -8.1% 9
Northside Elementary 169.8 159.1 -6.3% 13
Woodford County Middle School 145.2 137.3 -5.4% 16
Total -10.2% 8
*
Facility Name
Woodford County Schools Ranked 8th in the Nation for Teams
Woodford County National Building Competition
Rating Rating Energy Use Energy Use Change
(1-100) (1-100) kbtu/sq ft kbtu/sq ft From
May-15 June-13 May-15 June-13 Baseline
Huntertown Elementary 90 77 34.4 41.2 -16.5%
Simmons Elementary 82 62 41.3 49.8 -17.1%
Safe Harbor 76 60 46.9 51.9 -9.6%
Central Office 75 67 39.8 43.9 -9.3%
Southside Elementary 70 62 48.7 50.7 -3.9%
Woodford County High School 67 39 51.8 67.5 -23.3%
Woodford County Middle School 63 54 44.4 48.1 -7.7%
Northside Elementary 58 49 58.4 62.2 -6.1%
Group Total 70 54 46.7 54.6 -14.5%
Facility Name
Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings
90
82
76 75
7067
63
58
77
6260
67
62
39
54
49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HuntertownElementary
SimmonsElementary
Safe Harbor Central Office SouthsideElementary
WoodfordCounty High
School
WoodfordCounty
Middle School
NorthsideElementary
May-15
June-13
Woodford County Energy Star Portfolio Manager Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy Star = 75----------------------
34.4
41.3
46.9
39.8
48.751.8
44.4
58.4
41.2
49.851.9
43.9
50.7
67.5
48.1
62.2
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
HuntertownElementary
SimmonsElementary
Safe Harbor Central Office SouthsideElementary
WoodfordCounty High
School
WoodfordCountyMiddleSchool
NorthsideElementary
May-15
June-13
EUI (kbtu/sq.ft/)
2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank 2013 2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank 2013
1 Owen 62.5 37.9 67 31 Paintsville 53.3 50.4 26
2 Butler 42.8 38.3 1 32 Trimble 52.3 50.5 20
3 Corbin 51.6 41.0 17 33 Harlan Ind 52.3 50.5 21
4 Walton-Verona 44.6 42.5 4 34 Metcalfe 60.9 50.5 63
5 Scott 53.3 42.7 25 8 35 Monroe 48.6 50.6 10
6 Anderson 52.3 43.4 19 36 Edmonson 58.7 50.6 52
7 Burgin 60.5 44.5 61 37 Magoffin 64.7 50.8 81
8 Oldham 45.7 44.9 5 39 Clinton 53.5 51.0 28
9 Martin DNR 45.2 163 38 Livingston 56.9 51.0 46
10 Casey 49.5 45.3 12 40 Lawrence 68.6 51.1 97
11 Henry 67.7 45.4 93 41 Allen 57.1 51.3 47
12 Gallatin 60.0 45.6 57 42 Estill 53.4 51.5 27
13 Meade 48.7 45.7 11 43 Pendleton 55.9 51.6 41
14 Murray 47.2 46.0 8 44 Williamstown 63.3 52.2 73
15 Russell 80.5 46.0 140 45 Trigg 60.2 52.3 59
16 Bullitt 53.7 46.3 29 47 Daviess 53.9 52.7 31
17 Erlanger 56.9 46.4 45 46 Adair 71.1 52.7 112
18 Warren 50.7 46.6 15 48 Boyle 65.9 52.8 88
19 Shelby 71.6 47.2 114 49 Floyd 52.0 52.9 18
20 Hancock 57.8 47.4 51 50 Silver Grove 69.2 52.9 100
21 Dawson Springs 61.0 47.7 65 52 Barren 49.8 53.1 13
22 Jessamine 50.3 47.8 14 51 Woodford 63.5 53.1 75 85
23 Wayne 64.2 47.8 78 53 Jackson Co 57.4 53.3 49
24 Letcher 62.9 48.1 72 54 Boyd 81.2 53.4 144
25 Robertson 114.5 48.5 160 55 Knox 64.8 53.5 83
26 Hardin 54.3 48.9 32 56 Grayson 60.0 53.7 58
27 Glasgow 62.6 49.5 68 57 Crittenden 57.1 53.8 48
28 Russell ind 70.3 49.6 108 58 Spencer DNR 54.0 164
29 Lee 78.3 50.0 137 59 South Gate 47.2 54.1 9
30 Mclean 45.9 50.1 6 60 Science Hill 56.5 54.1 44
Key Factors for a SuccessfulEnergy Management Program
Support from School Board & Superintendent
Buy in by all Principals – the building leaders
Buy in from all faculty and staff
Educate students on saving energy
Provide weekly and monthly reports for competition
Identify Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s)
Implement ECM’s
Recognize achievements
Overall Summary Much progress has been made
Received Energy Star Partner of the Year Award in 2015
All Schools have now Earned the Energy Star Award
GMS won Green Ribbon School Award in 2012
Northern won Green Ribbon School Award in 2013
RSMS won Green Ribbon School Award in 2015
Achieved all of our goals during the year