Second IDPASC school Ezio TorassaUdine, February 1 st 2012 LHC Physics Lesson #2 Higgs boson...

Second IDPASC schoolEzio TorassaUdine, February 1st 2012

LHC Physics

Lesson #2

Higgs boson searches at LEP1 , LEP2 and LHC

IDPASC school


From the experimental observables:

line shape (s) FB asymmetries AFB(s) polarization P(cos)

pseudo-osservables can be extrapolated:

MZ Z h Al

FB etc..

Using a fit program (ZFITTER) with 2 loop QEWD and 3 loop QED the best fit can be obtained for the parameters of the model and for the masses having some uncertainty (mt, ,mH ). The current version of ZFITTER (in C++) is Gfitter.

Global fits are performed in two versions: the standard fit uses all the available informations except results from direct Higgs searches, the complete fit includes everything

Global Electroweak Fit


20 pseudo-osservables

5 fitted parameters

With the fitted parameters we can obtain

also the fitted pseudo-osservables


usage of latest experimental input:

Z-pole observables: LEP/SLD results [ADLO+SLD, Phys. Rept. 427, 257 (2006)]

MW and W: latest LEP+Tevatron averages (03/2010)[arXiv:0908.1374][arXiv:1003.2826]

mtop: latest Tevatron average (07/2010) [arXiv:1007.3178]

mc and mb: world averages [PDG, J. Phys. G33,1 (2006)]

had(5)(MZ

2): latest value (10/2010) [Davier et al., arXiv:1010.4180]

direct Higgs searches at LEP and Tevatron (07/2010)[ADLO: Phys. Lett. B565, 61 (2003)], [CDF+D0: arXiv:1007.4587]

Updated Status of the Global Electroweak Fit and Constraints on New Physics July 2011 arXiv:1107.0975v1

2min /DOF = 16.6 / 14


mH=81+52-33 GeV (2002)

mHiggs< 193 GeV 95% C.L.

mH=91+58-37 GeV (2003)


mH=96+60-38 GeV (2004)


MW

Ab FB

, Ac FB

, Rb , R

c

mH=96+31-24 GeV (2011)


GeV 96 3124

HM


Higgs searches at LEP

Z Z*

H

H

Z* Z

ECM=206 GeV

The coupling of the Higgs field to the vectorial bosons and fermions it’s fully defined in the Standard Model

The cross section of the Higgs production and the decay modes as a function ofit’s mass are predicted by the theory


Higgs-strahlung WW fusion

Dominant modem(H) s-m(Z)

+interference

MH(GeV/c2)

ECM=206 GeV

The dominating Higgs production mechanism at LEP1 and LEP2 is the “Higgs-strahlung”


Higgs decay channels

For mH 120 GeV, the most important decay chanel is H bb

“b-tagging” is relevant !

4 jets 2 jets &

missing energy

19%60%

Or a instead of the b

2 jet &

2 lepton

6%

Hbb 85%

H 8%

Reaserch topology:

Second IDPASC schoolEzio TorassaUdine, February 1st 2012Padova 12 Aprile 2011 Ezio Torassa

Neutrino decay channel

2 jets &

missing energy

The signature is one unbalanced hadronic event.

The background is due to Z decay into b quarks

Background reduction:

• invariant mass of the two jets MZ

• jets not in collinear directions

• b-tagging

Leptons transverse momentum

bc

uds

Tracks impact parameters

udsc b

Higgs searches at LEP1


(1) Preselection:

Acollinearity > 8 0

20 GeV < Minvariant < 70 GeV

Zqq Z H (55GeV)X

Eff. ( Z HX) = 81.2%

Eff. (Zqq) = 1.5 %

(2) Neural network:

Neural network with 15 input variables. The output is a single quality variables: Q takes values between 0 and 1

Data analysis example (1991-1992)

Q ( )

Z HXZqq

Eff. ( Z HX) = 65.8%

Eff. (Zqq) = 0.23 %

Q > 0.95

( to be multiplied with the previous Eff. )


Results

MH (GeV) 50 55 60 65

Eventi (simulati HZ) 7.90.4 3.60.2 1.40.1

0.410.05

# expected signal events

# observed events: 0 # expected background events : 0

Sum of the tree decay channels: Z Zee Z

For MH = 55.7 GeV we have 3 expected signal events events.

The probability to observe 0 events from a Poisson distribution with mean value 3 is 5%.

Higgs mass limit: MH > 55.7 GeV al 95 % di C.L.

LEP1 : 1989-19954 detectors , all channels

m(Higgs) > 65 GeV /c2 at 95%CL

DELPHI 1991-1992:

1 M hadronic events

~380 k events ee

LEP1 1989-1995

17 M hadronic events


Large number of events Gauss distribution approximation Small number of events Poisson distribution n = number of observed events m = mean number of events

n=0 m 3 @ 95% CL n=2 m 6.3 @ 95% CL

For the Higgs search m is related to the Higgs mass m xx MH ≥ yy

Contributions to the mean value m: background (b) and signal (s) :

n is the measurement;

• Exclusion (at least at 95% CL): the probability to observe n events 5%

• Discovery (5 significance): signal 5 times larger than the error

;;;!

)|( mmnnme

mn n

nm

;;;!

)()|(

)(

sbsbnn

sbesbn n

nsb

Exclusion and discovery


EXCLUSIONThe observed small number of events could be due to

a statistical fluctuation with prob. 5×10-2

DISCOVERY

The observed large number of events could be due to a statistical fluctuation with prob. 5.7×10-5

Lexclusion

Increasing the Integrated luminosity the background uncertainty decreases. When the difference between background and background+signal is 2 the Luminosity for the exclusion is reached.

Ldiscovery

Similar definition for the discovery

Really observe n events and expect to observe n events at a given luminosity is not the same.At the exclusion (or discovery) Luminositythe probability to reach the goal is 50%


Signaficance

;;;!

)()|(

)(

sbsbnn

sbesbn n

nsb

sb

sScP

When the background b

can be precisely estimated

The inclusion of the background error b with a Gaussian distribution needs a specific calculation, with the Gaussian approximation for the number of events n the significance can be expressed with the following relation:

2bb

sScl

b

sScP With high statistics, for few units of significance,

the denominator is only √b


• With a large number of observed events (n>>n), the statistical fluctuations do not have a big impact in the final result; for small numbers is the opposite:

small changes in the selection can produce big differences (i.e. 0 evts 2 evts)

• None is “neutral” , good arguments can be found to modify a little bit the cuts to obtain a sensible change of the final result;

• The selection criteria must be defined a priori with the MC to optimize the signal significance, only at the end we can open the box and look the impact on the real data. This method is called “blind analysis”.

The “blind analysis”


Higgs searches at LEP II

MH

ECM=206 GeV

The “Higgs-strahlung” is dominant production also at LEP II. At higher s

- the diboson fusion increas the relative relevance;

- higher Higgs masses can be produced.


Higgs decay channels at LEP II

The most relevant decay channel is H bb like at LEP IOver 115 GeV (LHC region) other decay channels (WW e ZZ) becames relevant or dominant

4 jets 2 jets &

missing energy

19%60%

Or a instead of the b

2 jet &

2 lepton

6%

Hbb 85%

H 8%

Research topology:

LEP I

LEP II


e+ f’

e-f

Z

W+, Z, e+

,e

e- W-, Z,

e+H

e- Z

Z

e+ -

e-

W+

W-

H

In addition to Zff we have also the WW , ZZ and production and decays.

e+

e-

e+

e-

qq

e+e- → e+e-qq


ALEPH

HZ4jet, s=192 GeV

mH=90 GeV, L = 500 pb-1

OPAL

HZ2jet 2, s=192 GeV,

mH=80 GeV, L = 1000 pb-1.

Invariant mass distribution for the signal and the backgrounds (MC)

After the selection dibosons are the main source of background

mH=80 GeV mH=90 GeV


mH=100 GeV

Invariant mass distribution

for MC and real data.

mH=115 GeV

Final LEP selections

for 115 GeV search

(Loose and Tight)


Statistic approach for the global combination

We need to combine the results from different channels (Hqq, H, Hll) and different energies Ecm. They are grouped in the same two-dimensional space (mH rec , G)

mH rec reconstruced invariant mass

G discrimanant variable (QNN, b-tag)

For every k channel we obtain:

- bk estimanted background

- sk estimated signal (related to mH)

- nk number of Higgs candidate from the real data

We build the Likelihood for two hypothesis:

- candidates coming from signal + background Ls+b

- candidates coming from background Lb

mHrec

G


!

))(()|(

))((

n

msbesbn

nH

msb H

P

We want to discriminate the number of observed events (n)

w.r.t. the mean number of expected signal plus background (b+s) or only background (b)

The following is the probability for b+s , s is a function related to mH :

The Likelihood is the product of the probability density (k channel density)

kn

i kk

ikkHikk

kHkkk bs

BbmSsmsbnPL

1

)())(|(


The comparison between the two hypothesis is provided by the Likelihood ratio.

)(

)()(

|

|

Hbn

HsbnH mL

mLmQ

2))(ln(2 HmQ

We choose to describe the results with the log of the ratio because it provides the 2 difference :

We look to the function -2ln(Q(mH))

(i) For the real data

(ii) For the MC with n=b

(iii) For the MC with n=b+s

kkHkk n

i kk

ikkHikk

k k

nHkk

msb

bs

BbmSs

n

msbeL

1

))(( )(

!

))((


green: 1 from the background yellow: 2 from the background

background(higher 2 for b+s)

signal+background(higher 2 for b)


mH > 114.4 GeV/c2 at 95% CLs

Finally we can estimate the exclusion at 95% of confidence level

(CLs = CLs+b / CLb)

Over 114 GeV/c2 the real data line (red) is closer the the s+b line (brown)

anyway the real data line is always (every mH ) within 2from the background line

LEP I mH > 65 GeV/c2 LEP II mH > 114.4 GeV/c2


The “window” for MHiggs

114.4 GeV

171 GeV

This exclusion window is at 95% of C.L. , masses outside this window are not forbidden, they have a smaller probability



Higgs serches at LHC

ECM = 7 TeV

L max = 3.54 1033 cm-2 sec-1

CMS


Cosmic Rays

LHC~ 100 mb

(AKENO, FLY’S EYE)

SPS (SppS) (UA1, UA4 UA5)

TEVATRON (CDF, E710, E811)

( ISR )

LHC7 TeV

Total cross section at LHCEPL Volume 96, Number 2, October 2011 First measurement of the total proton-proton cross-section at the LHC energy of √s =7TeV

Second IDPASC schoolEzio TorassaUdine, February 1st 2012Padova 19 Aprile 2011 Ezio Torassa

protone protone

Main interaction

ISR e FSR

Jets from high pt particles

Fragmentation and hadronization

Multi partonic interacions

Beam Remnant


Underlying Event and Minimum Bias

The Underlying Event is the residual part of the event excluding the high pt process:

ISR, FSR, Multi partonic interactions, Beam remanent

Together with the p-p interaction producing the high pt process, we can find additional p-p interactions in the same beam-crossing PileUp

protone protone


Δ Ei = 0

Elastic scattering (25%)

Double diffractive inelastic (8%)

Not diffractive inelastic (55%)

Single diffractive inelastic (8%)

Minimum Bias: soft inelastic scattering

- Observable fro the detector (Pt min ~100 MeV)

- None (or few) tracks produced at significant Pt (~ 2 GeV)


E.W. backgroundLEP

103

107

QCD background

HH

1/year

LHCLHC: Higgs factory inside a little bit hostile environment

1/hour

From LEP to LHC


SM Higgs production cross section including NNLO/NLO QCD corrections

Higgs boson production at LHC

mH (GeV)


Higgs branching ratios

ff

fhfm

v

mg W

VhVV m

v

mg

22

Higgs boson decays

For Higgs masses over 135 GeV the main decay channels are WW(*) and ZZ(*)

under 135 GeV they are bb , +- and

The coupling constant of the Higgs to the fermions and bosons are proportional to the mass of the particles:

2GeV/c246sin

WWmv

When mH is high enough to open a new decay channel this one becomes the dominant mH (GeV)


BR(hWW) / BR(hZZ) = g2hWW / g2

hZZ = 4mW2 / mZ

2 ~ 3

This rule can be broken when the two mass are very close:BR(WW) > BR (ZZ) but mW < mZ

In the Lagrangian the ZZ has a factor two of penalty in comparison to WW because they are indistinguishable. This factor 2 it becomes a factor 4 in the BR, reduced to a factor 3 considering the different masses


The Higgs boson width

The width changes from few MeV for low masses to hundreds of GeV for high masses due to his dependece on m3

H (from H→VV coupling)

mH (GeV)


mH (GeV)


Higgs search at LHC

Higss search status report CERN seminar December 13th, 2011

In high mass region the discovery can be obtained using the WW and ZZ channelsIn the low mass region the contribution from several channels can be useful

ATLAS

CMS


Direct production of WW

Wt

The signal signature is:

- 2 high Pt leptons - missing Et- veto for high energy Jet - angular correlation between W-W

DYtt

HWW (*) 2l 2Signal

Background


Data describes the predicted background wellExclusion window:Expected: 129 < MH < 236 GeV Observed: 132 < MH < 238 GeV


In the region mH < 140 GeV 3 events are observed: two 2e2μ events (m=123.6 GeV, m=124.3 GeV) and one 4μ event (m=124.6 GeV)

HZZ (*) 4l


In the region mH < 160 GeV 13 events are observed: The excess is distributed in a wider mass range w.r.t. ATLAS


135 < mH < 156 GeV181 < mH < 234 GeV

255 < mH < 415 GeV

134 < mH < 158 GeV180 < mH < 305 GeV

340 < mH < 460 GeV


H

CMS PAPER HIG-11-033


November 2011CMS PAS HIG-11-023, ATLAS-CONF-201-157

LEP (95%CL)

mH > 114.4 GeV

Tevatron exclusion (95%CL):

100 < mH < 109 GeV156 < mH < 177 GeV

ATLAS+CMS combination: based on data recorded until end August 2011 (~2.3 fb-1 / exp.)

Excluded 95% CL : 141-476 GeV Excluded 99% CL : 146-443 GeV (except ~222, 238-248, ~295 GeV)

Higgs exclusion window

114 - 141


HZZ 4μ candidate with m4μ= 124.6 GeV

pT (μ-, μ+, μ+, μ-)= 61.2, 33.1, 17.8, 11.6 GeVm12= 89.7 GeV, m34= 24.6 GeV


Higgs searches at LEP I :

Z Physics at LEP I CERN 89-08 Vol 2 – Higgs search (pag. 58)

Search for the standard model Higgs boson in Z decays – Nucl Physics B 421 (1994) 3-37

Higgs searches at LEP II :

Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at LEP – CERN-EP/2003- 011

Higgs searches at LHC:

CMS PAS HIG-011-32 SM Higgs Combination

Date post:	19-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	bethany-walton
View:	213 times
Download:	0 times

Second IDPASC school Ezio TorassaUdine, February 1 st 2012 LHC Physics Lesson #2 Higgs boson...

Documents