+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Selective esterification of triethylene glycol with methacrylic...

Selective esterification of triethylene glycol with methacrylic...

Date post: 12-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Indian Journal of Chemical Technology Vol. 10, May 2003, pp. 324-325 Selective esterification of triethylene glycol with methacrylic acid us ing methane sulphonic acid J S Notay*, S M Dahiwale' & S S Bhagade b Proof and Experimental Establishment, Chandipur 756 025, India a INS Shivaj i, Lonavla 410 402, India b Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, Nagpur University, Nagpur 440 010, India Received 5 July 2001; revised received 21 Februa 2003; accepted 7 March 2003 The esterification of tri·ethylene glycol with methacrylic acid under identical conditions of catalyst concentration, for synthesis of tri·ethylene glycol di·methacrylate using sulphuric acid and methane suiphonic acid as catalyst is discussed. The reaction by·products are lesser in case of methane sulphonic acid catalyst, comparison to sulphuric acid catalyst. Therefore the yield of ester product, tri'ethylene glycol di·methacrylate, achieved during the synthesis is higher with the use of methane suiphonic acid as a catalyst, than on use of sulphuric acid as catalyst. This concludes that methane sulphonic acid has better catalyst selectivity in comparison to sulphuric acid , for the synthesis of tri·ethylene glycol di· methacrylate. Methane sulphonic acid when neutralized is easily bio.degradable which is also desirable from environmental point of view. The esters of tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) and methacrylic acid (MA) are commercially very important. Methacrylate esters of TEG find applications in, the manufacture of plastic lenses I , anaerobic adhesive having good bond strength 2 , formulation of adhesives for Acronitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastics 3 , manufacture of polymers with high refractive index and optical articles 4 , orthopedic plastic brace 5 , adhesives specially useful for bonding a ferrite core of induction coil 6 , formulation of composition used for dental application 7 , and propellants industry as moderant 8 . The literature available on the manufacture of methacrylate esters of TEG 9 - 15 is very scanty. The catalyst used for industrial/commercial scale manufacture of esters are mainly mineral acids. The methacrylate ester of TEG is manufactured using sulphuric ac id (SA) as catalyst l 4 . Detailed study was carried out to investigate the comparative *For correspondence (E-mail :[email protected]) Notes performance of MSA and SA catalysts from selective catalysis point of view for development of ester product, Tri-ethylene Glycol Di-Methacrylate (TEGDM). The potential of methane sulphonic acid (MSA) catalyst over SA catalyst for industrial/commercial scale production of high purity ester of glycol and MA is presented in this paper. Experimental Procedure Materls Following chemicals were used during the investigation : Methacrylic acid, assay 99% (E- Merck, Germany); Methane sulphonic acid, assay 98% (SD Fine Chemicals, Mumbai); Sulphuric acid, assay 98%; Hydroquinone, assay 99%; Toluene, assay 99% (Qualigens Fine Chemicals, Mumbai) and Tri- ethylene glycol, assay 97% (Fluka). Experimental set-up The reaction was carried out in a three-necked half litre round bottom flask at atmospheric pressure. A magnetic stirrer was placed inside for stirring the reaction mixture. The central neck was fitted with Dean and Stark apparatus. A condenser was placed over Dean and Stark apparatus. One neck was stoppered, and the other neck was used for inserting thermowell for temperature recording. Method TEG, MA and toluene were taken in the mole ratio of 1 :2.2 : 11.3 . The catalyst concentration employed was 9.86 meq per 100 g of the reaction mixture. Hydroquinone was employed as a polymerisation inhibitor. Temperature was maintained around 378- 388 K. The water produced in the reaction was continuously removed azeotropically from the reaction system, till there was no further formation of water in the reaction system. The crude ester was filtered and subjected to washing for neutralising free acid with 2% NaHC0 3 solution and water wash. MSA is highly soluble in water and is easily extracted with small amount of water from crude ester in toluene medium. This phenomenon helps in reducing the requirement of water for washing purposes in comparison to the use of SA as catalyst in esterification. Further, due to density difference, the
Transcript
  • Indian Journal of Chemical Technology Vol. 1 0, May 2003, pp. 324-325

    Selective esterification of triethylene glycol with methacrylic acid using methane

    sulphonic acid J S Notay*, S M Dahiwale' & S S Bhagadeb

    Proof and Experimental Establishment, Chandipur 756 025, India aINS Shivaji , Lonavla 4 1 0 402, India

    bLaxminarayan Institute of Technology, Nagpur University, Nagpur 440 010, India

    Received 5 July 2001; revised received 21 February 2003; accepted 7 March 2003

    The esterification of tri·ethylene glycol with methacrylic acid under identical conditions of catalyst concentration, for synthesis of tri·ethylene glycol di·methacrylate using sulphuric acid and methane sui phonic acid as catalyst is discussed. The reaction by·products are lesser in case of methane sulphonic acid catalyst, in comparison to sulphuric acid catalyst. Therefore the yield of ester product, tri'ethylene glycol di·methacrylate, achieved during the synthesis is higher with the use of methane sui phonic acid as a catalyst, than on use of sulphuric acid as catalyst. This concludes that methane sulphonic acid has better catalyst selectivity in comparison to sulphuric acid, for the synthesis of tri·ethylene glycol di· methacrylate. Methane sulphonic acid when neutralized is easily bio.degradable which is also desirable from environmental point of view.

    The esters of tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) and methacrylic acid (MA) are commercially very important. Methacrylate esters of TEG find applications in, the manufacture of plastic lenses I , anaerobic adhesive having good bond strength2, formulation of adhesives for Acronitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastics3, manufacture of polymers with high refractive index and optical articles4, orthopedic plastic brace5, adhesives specially useful for bonding a ferrite core of induction coil6, formulation of composition used for dental application7, and propellants industry as moderant8.

    The literature available on the manufacture of methacrylate esters of TEG9- 15 is very scanty. The catalyst used for industrial/commercial scale manufacture of esters are mainly mineral acids. The methacrylate ester of TEG is manufactured using sulphuric acid (SA) as catalyst l4. Detailed study was carried out to investigate the comparative

    *For correspondence (E-mail :notay58@ yahoo.com)

    Notes

    performance of MSA and SA catalysts from selective catalysis point of view for development of ester product, Tri-ethylene Glycol Di-Methacrylate (TEGDM). The potential of methane sulphonic acid (MSA) catalyst over SA catalyst for industrial/commercial scale production of high purity ester of glycol and MA is presented in this paper.

    Experimental Procedure Materials

    Following chemicals were used during the investigation : Methacrylic acid, assay 99% (EMerck, Germany) ; Methane sulphonic acid, assay 98% (SD Fine Chemicals, Mumbai); Sulphuric acid, assay 98%; Hydroquinone, assay 99%; Toluene, assay 99% (Qualigens Fine Chemicals, Mumbai) and Triethylene glycol, assay 97% (Fluka).

    Experimental set-up The reaction was carried out in a three-necked half

    litre round bottom flask at atmospheric pressure. A magnetic stirrer was placed inside for stirring the reaction mixture. The central neck was fitted with Dean and Stark apparatus. A condenser was placed over Dean and Stark apparatus . One neck was stoppered, and the other neck was used for inserting thermowell for temperature recording.

    Method TEG, MA and toluene were taken in the mole ratio

    of 1 :2 .2: 1 1 .3 . The catalyst concentration employed was 9.86 meq per 1 00 g of the reaction mixture. Hydroquinone was employed as a polymerisation inhibitor. Temperature was maintained around 378-388 K. The water produced in the reaction was continuously removed azeotropically from the reaction system, till there was no further formation of water in the reaction system. The crude ester was filtered and subjected to washing for neutralising free acid with 2% NaHC03 solution and water wash. MSA is highly soluble in water and is easily extracted with small amount of water from crude ester in toluene medium. This phenomenon helps in reducing the requirement of water for washing purposes in comparison to the use of SA as catalyst in esterification. Further, due to density difference, the

  • Indian J. Chern. Techno!., November 2002

    water layer and ester product in toluene medium separate easily into two layers and it makes separation very easy.

    The washed ester product TEGDM in toluene medium is subjected to vacuum distillation to recover toluene.

    Results and Discussion The samples were subjected to Gas

    Chromatography Mass Spectrograph Test (GCMS). The results of the test revealed that the desired ester product TEGDM, obtained was 94.03 % with the use of novel catalyst MSA, and 85. 1 9% only with the use of conventional SA catalyst, under identical catalyst concentration. The comparative analysis of ester product TEGDM and by-product formation for the catalyst SA and MSA is shown in Table 1 .

    Based on the yield of esters achieved, the performance of catalyst MSA was found to be superior to the conventional SA catalyst. Thus from catalyst selectivity point of view MSA is far more superior as compared to SA catalyst, because of reduced by-product formation and higher yield of TEGDM. The achievement of this investigation is that, the by-products with molecular weight (MW) 1 14 and 1 32 obtained during synthesis of TEGDM have been identified. The by-product with molecular weight of 1 32 is formed due to dehydration of one molecule of water from TEG and by-product with molecular weight of 1 14 is formed due to dehydration of two molecules of water from TEG. The product developed using novel catalyst MSA has low free acidity in comparison to conventional SA catalyst. This concludes that MSA has better catalyst selectivity in comparison to SA for synthesis of TEGDM. From environmental point of view also, when neutralized, MSA is considered as a better choice because it is readily biodegradable. Thus, MSA catalyst holds vast potential to replace mineral

    Articles

    Table I-Yield of TEGDM and by products using SA and MSA

    Catalyst By product By product By product Yield of (MW- 1 1 2) (MW- 1 1 4) (MW- 1 32) TEGDM

    (%) (%) (%) (%)

    SA 2.68 2.35 9.77 85. 1 9

    MSA 1 .24 1 .67 3 .06 94.03

    acid catalyst like SA for industrial and commercial production of high purity esters of glycols and MA.

    References 1 Yasuaki Funae, Yamamoto Tetsuya & Matsuda Tatsuto,

    Japan ( 1 99 1 ) 03223308 A2 2 Xingqi Chen, Hunan Daxue Xuebao, 1 8(3) ( 199 1 ) 64 3 Changxi Lin, Aizi Shen & Jiang Zhi, Zhanjie, 1 2(4) ( 199 1 )

    1 9 4 Matsuda Tatsuto, Yasuaki Fune & Hiroji Fukuhar, Japan

    ( 1 993) 05 1 40250 A2 5 Raymond F G, Ger Offen ( 1994) DE 4329775 A l 6 Carsten Friese, Frank Bergmann & Huver Thomas, Ger

    Offell ( 1 996) DE 442747 1 A l 7 Blackwell Gordon & Huang Chin, Canada, ( 1 996) Patent

    Application CA 2 1 3 1 040 AA; Chem Abstr, 1 24 ( 1 996) 3528 1 4

    8 James R W , Propellants alld Explosives, Rev No. 40 (Noyes Data Corporation, New Jersey), 1 974, 1 3, 26, 27

    9 Chuji Aso & Sadakata Kazuo, Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 63 ( 1960) 1 88; Chem Abstr, 56 ( 1962) 1 5667g

    1 0 Helmut Stueck, Germany (East), ( 1968) 62049 (CI C 07c); Chem Abstr, 70 ( 1 969) 961 75e

    I I Moikin G Y, Gumencuk L M, Krom E N & Kartashov Y R, Zh Prikl Khim, 52 (5) ( 1 979) 1 1 36

    1 2 Xinggi Chen, Ligong Yang, Y i Wan & Jianjun Xie, Shiyou Huagollg, 1 6 ( 10) ( 1 987) 720

    1 3 Xinggi Chen, Yonggui Xie, Yongdong L i & Fanghong Li, Shiyou Huagong, 18 (6) ( 1989) 38 1 ; Chem Abstr, 1 12 ( 1997) 79885

    14 Zhengyao Pan & Huang He, Japan Daxue Xuebao, Ziran Kexue Yu Yixueban, 1 2 ( 1 ) ( 1 99 1 ) 1 32; Chem Abstr, 1 1 6 ( 1 997) 60022

    1 5 Zhongli Ding & Minghong Wu, Shanghai Keji Daxue Xuebao, 1 4(2) ( 199 1 ) 1 00; Chem Abstr, 1 1 6 ( 1 997) 1 05596

    325


Recommended