Date post: | 22-Jan-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | sesar-joint-undertaking |
View: | 1,320 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Green ATMGreen ATM
W l i kWelcoming remarks
Alain Siebert, Chief Environment & Economist
Amsterdam – 9 March 2011
AgendaAgenda9:30 Welcoming remarks
Alain Siebert, Chief Economist & Environment, SESAR Joint Undertaking
9:35 SESAR’s environmental approachCélia Alves Rodrigues, Environment Officer, SESAR Joint Undertaking
9:45 Strategic fitPierre Caussade, Senior Vice President Environment & SustainableDevelopment, Air France
10:00 Quick wins: Examples from the fieldOceanic/En-Route: Rudy Kellar, Vice President Operations, NAV Canada Terminal: Evert Westerveld, AIRE Project Manager, LVNL Surface: Robin Onghena, DSNA
Page 2
AgendaAgenda10:45 What comes thereafter: moving towards the perfect flight
with SESAR Captain Peter Larsson, Airspace User Lead Expert for Project B4.2, Scandinavian Airlines
11:00 Final word and end of technical workshop pAlain Siebert, Chief Economist & Environment, SESAR Joint Undertaking
END
Page 3
SESAR Environmental Approachpp
ATC Global 2011Green ATM workshop – 9 March 2011Green ATM workshop 9 March 2011Célia Alves Rodrigues – Environment Officer
Build a new ATM system that is Build a new ATM system that is able to meet future mobility needsable to meet future mobility needsable to meet future mobility needs able to meet future mobility needs while protecting the environmentwhile protecting the environment
Page 5
Main Opportunities
• One programme: collaboration and i l iinclusiveness
• Building a compelling Environmental Case, driver to secure industry buy-in
• Support the developmentSupport the development of adequate standards and regulation to support deployment
▪ Sustainable development and global emissions on top of the political deployment
• Practical/fact oriented approach
agenda
▪ ATM enhancements are the main opportunity to reduce aviation's f i b f 2020 fi d b• Innovative thinking
Page 6
footprint before 2020 – confirmed by a recent study
Environment is a priority for SESAR
Three Layer Environmental Approach
1. Implement greener practices in the workplace and reduce SJU’s environmental footprint (notenvironmental footprint (not presented)
2. Principles to be applied to the SESAR R&D programme
3. Incremental SESAR deployment and monitoring
High Level Environment Objectives
SESAR should be recognised as the most environmentally - consciousenvironmentally conscious ATM development programme in the world
Enable 10% fuel savings per flight as a result of ATM improvements aloneimprovements alone
Improve the role of ATM in developing environmental p grules
Be the driver of change!
Page 8
R&DR&D
E th t E i t iEnsure that Environment is treated as a priority inside the Programme
Page 9
SJU management response
• Ensure progress & facilitate collaborative decisionsdecisions
• Monitor the effectiveness of the R&D activities to define environmental rules
• Gate to gate environmental considerationsconsiderations
• Develop the SESAR label• Validation close toValidation close to
operations• Monitor other research
j tprojectsPage 10
SESAR programme level – Projects (1/2)
• 80% of SESAR projects address environmental issues directly or indirectly
• Establish & monitor• Establish & monitor environmental performance targets and indicators
• Develop compelling environment cases
• Support decision making
Page 11
SESAR programme level – Projects (2/2)
• Advanced validation methodology ensuring end-gy gto-end consideration of environmental aspects in all R&D activitiesR&D activities
• Focus on data collection in th fi ld fthe field versus use of models/simulations
• Consideration of environmental trade-offs –noise / CO2 in parallelnoise / CO2 in parallel
Page 12
AIRE - Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions
• Capitalize on present aircraft capabilitiesp
• Provide best practices and success stories
• Demonstrate benefits by performing flight trials
• Accelerate transition to implementation
Mapping of AIRE projects• Mapping of AIRE projects with SESAR projects
• A pragmatic transatlanticA pragmatic transatlantic partnership
Page 13
AIRE Expansion
• Expand – more regions & partners
• More focused taking into account previous AIRE accou t p e ousresults and SESAR developments
• Full integration in overall SESAR validation roadmap
• Disseminate AIRE best practicespractices
Page 14
Incremental SESAR deployment and
it imonitoring
E th d l tEnsure the deployment and effective use of new
d ATMPage 15
and greener ATM technologies
2012 objectives
• Initial 4D trajectory is validated in an operational environment
t d b t llit b dsupported by satellite-based technology
• 5,000 flights, including 500 military, are SESAR labelled
• SESAR benefits are demonstrated on city pairsdemonstrated on city pairs connecting 8 European airports
• Airspace users have signed up to the SESAR business caseto the SESAR business case (including the environment case) for time-based operationsoperations
Page 16
Proposed Approach
C lli E i t• Compelling Environment case is developed for first SESAR deployment Packages ( li bl f 2013)(applicable from 2013)
• Deliver early R&D results enabled fuel burn reductions of approximately 2% in 2012 (baseline 2010)
• Reduce taxi out by 1 minute per departure in major airportsdeparture in major airports
• Assess CO2 footprint of current noise abatement proceduresnoise abatement procedures
Page 17
Conclusions
• Environment is a priority for SESAR• Ambitious environmental targets• ATM Master Plan is our common roadmap toATM Master Plan is our common roadmap to
success• PPP works and is a unique opportunity to
introduce changeintroduce change• Validation as close as possible to the
operational environment• Capitalizing on present aircraft capabilities
and local partnerships matter to us: concrete demonstration of results now with AIRE
Lets make it happen together!
Page 18
Th kThank you ……
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
www.sesarju.eu
Strategic fit g
Pierre Caussade – Air France
KEY ISSUESFOR A SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Pierre CaussadePierre CaussadeSenior VP Environment and Sustainable Development
Air France
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Some key figures for Air France-KLM
1 Group, 2 companies Revenues (2009-10) = 21 billion €
Workforce (31.12.09) Ground Staff : 73 000 Flight Attendant : 26 000 Cockpit Crew : 9 200
Fleet : 594 aircraft
Network : 236 destinations within 107 countries
3 businesses 71 millions passengers
1.5 millions tons of cargo 1.5 millions tons of cargo
Engineering and Maintenance customers : 150 airlines worldwide
Founding member of the SkyTeam alliance
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
ou d g e be o t e S y ea a a ce
Addressing five key issues for a sustainable development
Combating climate change
Minimizing our environmental impacts
Building a sustainable relationship with our customers
Promoting a responsible human resources policy
Driving local development
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Combating climate change
Our Climate Action Plan :
We moderni e o r fleetWe modernize our fleet
We optimize our daily operationsWe optimize our daily operations
We promote research programs (aircraft, engines, alternative fuels ATM )fuels, ATM…)
We actively contribute to international negotiations in order to reach a global agreement under the umbrella of ICAOg g
We support environmental programs led by NGO’s
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Combating climate change
Some key figures :
1 tonfuel burnt
3.15 tons=of CO2 emitted
2 t 3 % 3 82 to 3 %of global man-made CO2 emissions
3.8 liters/passenger/100 km
95 gCO2/passenger/km2
AF KLM fuel efficiency
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Combating climate change
Manufacturers, airlines, airports and ANSPs bodies have jointly and globally committed to specific goals to cut aviation-related CO2 emissions :
by 2020, to improve energy efficiency by 1.5% a year
f 2020 t th t bili ti f CO i i d f th from 2020, to ensure the stabilization of CO2 emissions and further neutral carbon growth
by 2050, 50% reduction of CO2 emissions compared to 2005 levels by 2050, 50% reduction of CO2 emissions compared to 2005 levels
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Key factors for CO2 emissions reduction (source : IATA)
KEY
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
An other key issue : to minimize noise pollution
We promote ICAO “balanced approach” :
Cutting noise at source
O ti i b t t d Operating noise abatement procedures
Regulating land-use around airports
Restricting operations
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
g p
Focus on ATM issues
We fully support SESAR and NextGen research Programs
We are proud to have been fully committed to SESAR since day 1
AF operates first “green flight” from Europe to USA (part of AIRE program) – 6 april 2010
But we need to go FURTHERBut we need to go FURTHER
Quick wins
Pragmatic developments : low investment but significant results
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Conclusion
Finally, what is at stake ?
Our licence to grow !
Finally, what is at stake ?
Our licence to grow !
“We strive to achieve sustainable development through financial, social and environmental excellence”
Jean-Cyril SpinettaChairman of Air France-KLM
ATC Global 2011Amsterdam – 09 March 2011
Quick wins: examples fromthe fieldthe field
Rudy Kellar – NAV Canada
Evert Westerveld – LVNLEvert Westerveld LVNL
Robin Onghena - DSNA
Background
•SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) 2007 Modernization of European ATM systemCoordinates relevant research
•AIRE (Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions) )Managed by SJU and FAA Accelerate pace of Performance-Based
OperationOperation Implement fuel efficient procedures - all
flight phasesCapitalize on current aircraft capabilities
and best practices
Opportunity
Lead: NAV CANADAPartners: Air France, NATS
•Assess and trial flights o er North Atlantic•Assess and trial flights over North Atlantic• Identify and prioritize ATM procedures and systems for potential to reduce GHG emissionssystems for potential to reduce GHG emissions
•Participating airlines:Air CanadaAir CanadaUnited AirlinesBritish AirwaysBritish AirwaysDelta
ENGAGE Corridor SolutionO O C G SEUROPE – NORTH AMERICA Go ADS-B
for a GREENER ENVIRONMENT
Current OperationsCurrent Operations
ENGAGE:Opportunity on the NATOpportunity on the NAT
•Promote:Promote:CollaborationTechnologyTechnologyBest Practices
M ffi i t ti•More efficient operations•Improve performance•Opportunity to re-think and modify North Atlantic ytraffic
Track Structure:without expanded surveillancewithout expanded surveillance
Altitude
East Coast ADS-Bdo
cum
ent.
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d©
AIR
BUS
S.A.
S. A
ll rig
hts
rese
Track Structure:with expanded surveillance
Surveillance Airspace
with expanded surveillance
*
docu
men
t. *Altitude
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d
*Targets of opportunity to
Altitude
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se
pp yvary altitude &
Mach
How Do We Achieve This?Achieve This?
ADVANCEDADVANCED OCEANIC
ATC
NATS SAATS
SYSTEMS
docu
men
t.
NATS = SAATS
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d
NAV CANADA =
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se
GAATS+
A Collaborative Approacht k i i ti d th i t…to keeping an eye on aviation and the environment
ANSP:NAV CANADA
ANSP:NATSNATS
docu
men
t.er
ved.
Con
fiden
tial a
nd p
ropr
ieta
ry d
CUSTOMERS: ADVANCED
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se CUSTOMERS:AIR FRANCE
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
ENGAGE Trial DatesENGAGE Trial Dates
• Demonstration Flights - 2010June: World Environment Day
November: AIRE A380November: AIRE A380• Phase 1 – Approved December 2010
Pre-ops validation & proof of concept NAT flight trials
docu
men
t.
Pre-ops validation & proof of concept NAT flight trials• Phase 2 – Spring 2011
Operational flight trials (possible multiple flights)
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d Operational flight trials (possible multiple flights)Multiple flight simulation trials Flight data analysis
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se
Fuel burn and GHG results - Summer 2011
Next Steps
• Review flight trial results• Compile and analyze data • Proactive communications:
Achievable GHG emissionsEfficiency benefits
docu
men
t. • An invitation to Montréal, Canada
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d Canada Trial results to date and findings
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se findingsMay 2011
A Powerful Thought….
“Collaboration equalsequals innovation.”
docu
men
t.
Michael Dell
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d Michael Dell
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se
docu
men
t.er
ved.
Con
fiden
tial a
nd p
ropr
ieta
ry d
CIFER
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se CIFER
docu
men
t.er
ved.
Con
fiden
tial a
nd p
ropr
ieta
ry d
CIFER Looking Ahead
© A
IRBU
S S.
A.S.
All
right
s re
se CIFER - Looking Ahead
For moreFor more information:
docu
men
t. www.navcanada.ca
erve
d. C
onfid
entia
l and
pro
prie
tary
d©
AIR
BUS
S.A.
S. A
ll rig
hts
rese
SESAR Technical Sessions
Green ATMQuicks wins examples from the fieldQuicks wins, examples from the field
Schiphol AIRE trialTrajectory Based Night Time CDA’sj y g
Evert Westerveld
Sheet 49
LVNL, ATC the Netherlands
The Challenge
• Night “Transitions” (CDA from FL70) in l i id 90’place since mid 90’s
• Inbound “long haul wave” between 04:00 am and 05:30 am LT
• Bunching effects (with subsequent g ( qvectoring and holding) during “bad nights”
Sheet 50
The ChallengeCurrent night time proceduresCurrent night time procedures
Sheet 51
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
03:55 LT
Sheet 52
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:00 LT
Sheet 53
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:05 LT
Sheet 54
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:10 LT
Sheet 55
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:15 LT
Sheet 56
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:20 LT
Sheet 57
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:25 LT
Sheet 58
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:30 LT
Sheet 59
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:35 LT
Sheet 60
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:40 LT
Sheet 61
The ChallengeExample of current night time opsExample of current night time ops
04:45 LT
Sheet 62
The Project
• Optimization of existing night time OPS• Pre-planning and sequencing of flights• Taking benefits from trajectory information
exchange• Cutting excess trackmiles and level segments • Increasing percentage of top-of-descent type
CDA’s
Sheet 63
The Concept1 Automatic Connected Aircraft (= 80 %)1. Automatic Connected Aircraft ( 80 %)
ACARS DL
SITA / ARINC
KLM OCCMQ message set
ACC execPre-Planner
Operator
The Concept2 Web Connected Aircraft (= 10 plus %)2. Web Connected Aircraft ( 10 plus %)
ACARS DL
SITA / ARINC
Delta OCC
ACC execPre-Planner
OperatorW b I t fWeb Interface
The Concept3 Non Connected Aircraft (= 10 minus %)3. Non Connected Aircraft ( 10 minus %)
Radio Telephony
Coordination by telephone
ACC execPre-Planner
Operator MUAC / NATS
The Pre-Planner
Sheet 67
Status early March 2011
• Receiving live KLM trajectory data• Technical testing completed• Traffic analysis phase starting upy p g p• Procedures documentation @ 80%• Planning of first OPS tests in progress• Planning of first OPS tests in progress
Sheet 68
Trial Planning
Phase 3: Tuning pre-planner in operationsApril 8 – Sept 30, 2011
Phase 4: Full functional test (alt/spd restricted)October 2011
Phase 5: Emission Reduction TrialNovember 2011
Sheet 69
Work to be done…
Definition of Nominal Agreed Routes
Sheet 70
Organizations to acknowledge…
Atlantic Initiative to Red ce EmissionsReduce Emissions
ATC GLOBAL 2011SESAR TECHNICAL SESSIONSSESAR TECHNICAL SESSIONSMARCH 9, 2011
AIRE 2009/ 2010/2011 – CDG Surface Trials
Performance of flight trialsvalidating solutions for thereduction of CO2 emissions
Olivier DELAIN
Robin ONGHENA
Laurent RENOU
CDG Surface Trials initiatives
•Three initiatives have been addressed in 2009:• “Departure taxiing with one or two engines off”• Departure taxiing with one or two engines off• “Minimising arrival taxi time”• “Reduction of departure taxi time”
Evaluation 1 Departure taxiing with one or two engines off March 22 to April 10, 2009 16Evaluation 2 Minimising arrival taxi time April 14 to April 24, 2009 28
Identification Evaluation Title Dates Flights
Evaluation 3a Reduction of departure taxi time (Phase A) June 02 to June 09, 2009 6 Evaluation 3b Reduction of departure taxi time (Phase B) October 19 to October 22, 2009 309
Reduction of departure taxi timeContext and Objectives
Ensure consistency with CFMU slot if any
1Minimise the RWY pressure while guaranteeing a
2
j
y
3
g gsufficient number of aircraft at RWY entries so that the RWY controller can optimise the management of RWY
Manage the taxi time to sequence pushback times and ensure that the aircraft
Avoid too many aircraft in taxiways to increase safety, reduce stop and go, lower
iti ti t RWY
4and ensure that the aircraft arrives at runway threshold at calculated times
waiting times at RWY threshold, thus reducing fuel consumption and CO2emissions
Benefits Analysis of GLD process (Arthur D.Little, 2007):
Reduction of waiting time at RWY: 1700T of fuel/ year (Air France)Reduction of taxi time from stand to holding point: 2300 T of fuel /year (Air France)
Anticipate capacity increase by having a buffer of aircraft ready
For departure
5
DMAN STPV(Flight Data Processing System)
TOBT TSATRWY capacity,RWY pressure
GLD algorithm SARIA DPI Generator
DPI
CTOT
TOBT, TSATRWY pressure,RWY configuration
TOBT TSATTOBT TSAT
Airport and Airlines Systems
Alerts CDM@CDG website
CTOT: Calculated Take Off Time DPI: Departure Planning Information messageGLD: Gestion Locale des Départs (Implementing Pre-Departure Sequence Concept)SARIA: Système d’Allocation de Ressources et Informations Aéroportuaires (ADP airport database)STPV: Système Traitement Plans de Vols (French FDPS)TOBT: Target Off Block Time (time at which an AO or GH estimates will be ready -all doors closed, boarding bridges removed and g ( y , g gpushback vehicle available - and ready to start up/pushback immediately upon reception of clearance from the TWR (CDM implementation. Manual)TSAT: Target Start Up Approval Time (The time provided by ATC taking into account TOBT, CTOT and/or the traffic situation that an aircraft can expect start up / push back approval)
AIRE and PDS
Three main AIRE steps in parallel of PDS full implementation:
1 Th fli h l d i 2009 d 2010 (AIRE 1)1. The green flight: several tests during 2009 and 2010 (AIRE 1)2. The GLD evaluation from oct, 19th to Oct 22th 2009 (AIRE 1)3. Greener airports under adverse conditions (AIRE 2)
CDM@CDG project status: The commissioning of DMANHMI , linked with PDS system, is in
operation (live) from November 9 2010 at Paris Charles de Gaulleoperation (live) from November 9, 2010 at Paris Charles de Gaulleairport.
After Munich and Brussels, CDG is a labelled CDM airport (IP1) sinceNovember 16, 2010 (00:00 utc).
The scope of operational situations covered by this project includes Planned RWY closure, Low Visibility Operations,y p Situations where all aircraft have to de‐ice, Snow conditions
Greener Airports under Adverse Conditions
DMAN general interface for the Clearance Delivery Position
DMAN specific interface for TWR supervisorp
What comes thereafter: moving towards the perfect g pflight with SESAR
Captain Peter Larsson – ScandanavianAirlines
A successful flight with SESAR - from an airline perspective
2011-03-09
Peter LarssonPeter LarssonFlight Captain, Scandinavian AirlinesAU lead B4.2
BDT, Business Development Trajectory
M th b f fli ht• Months or years before flight• Not shared outside the airline• Gradual iterations and refinement (within the airline)
08 10
ARN
08.10
CPH
05MAY2025
07.00
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory
U f d d PBO P f B d O ti ith i i t d• User preferred and PBO, Performance Based Operation with minimum cost and environmental load. Both CPH and ARN will likely be ”managed” airspace withseparation service.
• Shared with ATM system
08 10
ARN
y• Gradual iterations and refinements between airline and ATM system
08.10
08.15
CPH07.00
07.05
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory
07.36
07 48
08 15
ARN
08.04:30
08.02
07.48
07 28 08.1508.0907.28
CPH
07.21
07.0507.17
SBT, Shared Business Trajectory
07.3607.37
08 15
08.04:30
ARN08.02
07.48
07 28
07.50
08.1508.0907.2808.11 08.17
CPH N50074E009303.0,R,2032,N54370E011559,4000,132814.0,,,N55134E012293,4000,133349.0,,,N55224E0Gradual iterations and refinements into :
07.21
07.0507.17
12377,4000,133512.0,,,N55332E012479,4000,133651.0,R,2034,N55484E013024,4000,133912.0,,,N56076E013272,4000,134225.0,,,N56203E013440,4000,134434.0,,,N56339E014020,4000,134651.0,,,N56459E014185,4000,134853.0,,,N57216E015078,4000,135458.0,,,N57544E015553,4000,140038.9,,,N58064E016132,4000,140243.0,,,N58167E016287,3539,140433.B,,,N58184E016312,3449,140451.0,R,1192,N58563E017301,1900,141232.A,,,N59091E017539,1900,141541.1,L,355,N59172E018092,1530,141744.0,R,972,N59319E018122,1042,142035.C,,,N59481E018181,550,142403.0,L,238,N59538E018202,483,142447.0,L,102,N59471E017580,247,142744.0,,,N59438E017568,138,142856.1,,,N59400E017554,17,143031.1,,,
RBT, Reference Business Trajectory
07.37Minimised air distance;saving emissions
Continous descent operations;saving emissions and noise
ARN07.2807 28
07.5008.04:30
07.2808.11 08.17Continous climb operations;
saving emissions and noise
CPH
07.21 • Agreement – not a clearance• Airlines agree to fly – ANSPs agree to facilitate• Times are estimates, but can also be targets and/or
07.21
07.0507.1707.17
07.05constraints• Automatic updates outside predefined thresholds• Revised if constraints change or RBT cannot be achieved
2500100%
Baseline 330NM Green FlightPost flight monitoring
2000
70%
80%
90%
(kg)
ght
1000
1500
40%
50%
60%
mulated
fue
l used (
Max Fue
l Flow/H
eig
Fuel Flow (% of Max) TKOF thrust excludedHeight (% of Max)
Ackumulated fuel used (kg)
500
10%
20%
30% Ackum
% of M
00%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Distance (NM)
Questions?
Final word
Alain Siebert – SESAR JU
Thank you for your attention!y y
Visit us at the SESAR JU booth inhall 9 and meet the SESAR experts!