Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alexandre-deangelo |
View: | 32 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Severe sepsis and septic shock
Zsolt MolnárUniversity of Szeged
AITI
Definition – 2000 years ago
• Hippocrates:– Breakdown of living tissues: „pepsis” and „sepsis”
• Celsus:– Rubor
– Dolor
– Calor
– Tumor
Bőrtünetek: diffúz erythema
• Hippocrates:– Breakdown of living tissues: „pepsis” and „sepsis”
• Celsus:– Rubor - Peripheral vasodilatation
– Dolor - Altered mental status
– Calor - Fever, hypothermia
– Tumor - Oedema
Definition – 2000 years ago
Tumor: generalizált ödéma
• Hippocrates:– Breakdown of living tissues: „pepsis” and „sepsis”
• Celsus:– Rubor - Peripheral vasodilatation
– Dolor - Altered mental status
– Calor - Fever, hypothermia
– Tumor - Oedema
• Galen:– Functio laesa
Definition – 2000 years ago
• Hippocrates:– Breakdown of living tissues: „pepsis” and „sepsis”
• Celsus:– Rubor - Peripheral vasodilatation
– Dolor - Altered mental status
– Calor - Fever, hypothermia
– Tumor - Oedema
• Galen:– Functio laesa - Organ dysfunction
Definition – 2000 years ago
From blood poisoning to sepsis
• „Sepsis-syndrome” and Las Vegas:• Fever or hypothermia (> 38 oC or < 36 oC) • Tachycardia (>90/min)
• Leukocytosis or leukopenia (> 12 000cells/mm3, < 4000cells/mm3, or > 10%
immature forms) • Hypotension (<90mmHg)
Bone RC, et al. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 654
• Consensus conference ACCP/SCCM:• Infection• Bacteraemia• Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)• Sepsis = SIRS + Infection• Severe sepsis (Sepsis + one organ dysfunction)
• Septic shock (hypoperfusion despite adequate fluid load)
• Multiple System Organ Failure (MSOF)ACCP/SCCM. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 864
Definitive diagnoses
I n s u l tEndotoxin, Trauma, Sterile
inflammation, Operation, etc.
Humoral activityInterferon, Complement
M a c r o p h a g e sTNF; IL-1,6,10; PAF
P M NFR, PAF, Chemotaxis
E n d o t h e lNO, E-selectin, NFkB
Fisiol. reactionsFever, Metabolic changes
Sepsis, SIRS
MSOF
Pathomechanism
Molnár and Shearer Br J Int Care Med 1998; 8: 12
Why do septic patients get into trouble?
The debt…
• DO2= (SV•P) • (Hb•1.39•SaO2+0.003•PaO2) ~ 1000ml/m (SaO2=100%)
• VO2 = CO • (CaO2 - CvO2) ~ 250 ml/min (ScvO2~70-75%)
CO CaO2
The debt…
• DO2= (SV•P) • (Hb•1.39•SaO2+0.003•PaO2) ~ 1000ml/m (SaO2=100%)
• VO2 = CO • (CaO2 - CvO2) ~ 250 ml/min (ScvO2~70-75%)• In critical illness:
• Shock = VO2>DO2
VO2DO2
CO CaO2
Supportive therapy
Early supportive treatment
• „Early Goal-Directed Therapy” (EGDT)Rivers E et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368
• Septic patients treated for 6 hours in A&E:– Control group (n=133):
• O2
• CVP: 8-12 mmHg• MAP >65 mmHg
– EGDT group (n=130):• Same goals• ScvO2 > 70%
•More fluid and blood•More dobutamine
Mortality: 46 vs. 30% (p=0.009)
• Ohm’s law:
Hemodynamic support in sepsis
I
UR
• Ohm’s law:
Hemodynamic support in sepsis
KCO
CVPMAP
I
USVR
• Severe sepsis, septic shock:• Vasodilatation: SVR (MAP) low, CO high• DO2/VO2 high
• Invasive haemodynamic monitoring:• Arterial + central venous line• Pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz)• Arterial thermodylution (PiCCO)
How can we recognise it?
Objective signs of organ dysfunction
0 1 2 3 4CNS (GCS) 15 13-14 10-12 7-9 ≤6CVS (P, inotr., lactate) ≤120 120-140 >140 Inotr. seLactate>5Resp (PaO2/FiO2) >300 226-300 151-225 76-150 ≤75Ren (seCreat) ≤100 101-200 201-350 351-500 >500Liver (seBi) ≤ 20 21-60 61-120 121-240 >240Hemat (TCT) >120 81-120 51-80 21-50 ≤20
Cook R et al. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2046
• Most frequent early signs:• Arterial hypoxemia: 60%
• Arterial hypotension: 57%
• Metabolic acidosis: 47%
• Atrial fibrillation: >10%
• Altered level of consciousness: >10%
Bogár L. Infektológia 2007; 14: 1-6
Low DE, et al. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1395
Organ dysfunction and outcome
Marshall JC et al. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1638
• SOFA score dinamics and outcome:•0-1. day •CVS (p=0.0010)•Creat (p=0.0001) •PaO2/FiO2 (p=0.0469)
•Se creat increase and mortality•~100µmol/24h p<0.05
Levy MM et al. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2194
Labortory signs of sepsis
• Fever (>38oC), WBC (>12 000): • Low sensitivity (~50%)
Galicier L and Richet H. Infect Control Hosp Epidemol 1985; 6: 487
• Blood culture:• Early results after 24 h only• Low sens/spec, especially in pneumonia caused sepsis (~30%)
Meakins JL. In: Crit Care: State of the Art 1991; 12: 141Luna CM et al. Chest 1999; 116: 1075
• TNF-, IL-6,1,8:• Short half life• Expensive tests
• Serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reaktive protein (CRP)• Senzitivity (%): 88(80-93) vs 75(62-84), p<0.05• Specificity (%): 81(67-90) vs 67(56-67), p<0.05
Simon L et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 206
Procalcitonin increase in early identification of critically ill patients at high risk of mortality
Jensen JU et al. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2596-2602
• PCT change/24h
• ≥1ng/ml or increasing (alert)
• <1ng/ml or decreasing (non-alert)
Procalcitonin increase in early identification of critically ill patients at high risk of mortality
Jensen JU et al. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2596-2602
Use of procalcitonin to shorten antibiotic treatment duration in septic patients: a randomized trial
Nobre V, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:498-505
• PCT vs control
• PCT-group (after day 3):
• 90% reduction
• <0.25 ng/ml
6 vs. 10 days
3 vs 5 days
Non-survivorsSurvivors
Proc
alci
toni
n (n
g m
l-1)
15
10
5
0
t 0
t 24
t 48
t 72
Data are presented as minimum, maximum, 25-75% percentile and median. For statistical analysis Mann-Whitney U test was used.
Szakmány T, Molnár Z. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 1082-3Molnár Z, Bogár L. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 2687-8
High postop PCT ≠ sepsis
Non-survivorsSurvivors
CRP (mg/L)
300
200
100
0
t 0
t 24
t 48
t 72
**p<0.05S = 130NS = 23
Surviving Sepsis Campaign – 2008Dellinger RP et al. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 17-60
• EGDT– Chrystalloid or colloid (1B)
• Diagnosis– 2/more immediate blood cultures (1C)– Immediate radiology (1C)
• Antibiotics– Within 1 h in severe sepsis (1D), septic shock (1B)– Broad spectrum ABs (1B)– De-escalation strategy (2D)– Stop ABs in case of infection is not proven (1D)
Resuscitation, infectionDellinger RP et al. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 17-60
• Vasopressors, inotropes• Bloos products• Activated protein C (rhAPC) „Xigris”• Glucose control• Steroid• Stb…(85 recommendations)
RecommendationsDellinger RP et al. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 17-60
Therapeutic evidence and outcome
Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: Can we improve outcome and lower cost?
Shorr AF et al. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1257
• Módszerek• Retrospective post-hoc analysis
• Pre-protocol: 2004-2005 (n=60)
• Protocol: 2005-2006 (n=60)– Surviving Sepsis Campaign:
• Early AB
• EGDT
• Vasopressor/inotrope
• Transfusion
• rhAPC
• Corticosteroids
Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: Can we improve outcome and lower cost?
Shorr AF et al. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1257
Mortality: 48 vs. 30% (p=0.04)
• Severe sepsis – mortality can be reduced!• Recognition
– Rationalised clinical and biochemical investigations
• Prevention:– Oxygen + fluid + monitoring (EGDT: ScvO2)
• Treatment:– EBM
Summary
• Severe sepsis – mortality can be reduced!• Recognition
– Rationalised clinical and biochemical investigations
• Prevention:– Oxygen + fluid + monitoring (EGDT: ScvO2)
• Treatment:– EBM
• Sepsis– Less of a diagnosis…– …more like a concept
Summary
Motto
Diagnosis can wait, but cells can’t!
It doesn’t matter whether you’ve donethe right thing,
but whether you’ve doneeverything to do the right thing