+ All Categories
Home > Design > Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Date post: 12-May-2015
Category:
Upload: nick-eubanks
View: 3,155 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
This is the deck from the May Meet-Up focused on Checkout Optimization & Shopping Cart User Experience
Popular Tags:
30
CHECKOUT OPTIMIZATION Shopping Cart User Experience Follow @ShameOnUX
Transcript
Page 1: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

CHECKOUT OPTIMIZATIONShopping Cart User Experience

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 2: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Statistics for Starters…

2012 Average Shopping Cart Abandonment Rate = 72.31%

Consumer Reason: High Shipping Costs Experience Reason: Security (Feeling of

data being safe & ability to return or exchange purchase

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 3: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Remember The $300 Million Button…

Follow @ShameOnUX

Source: User Interface Engineering. Ref: http://www.uie.com/articles/three_hund_million_button

Email Address:

Password:

Login Register

Forgot password?

Email Address:

Password:

Login Continue

Forgot password?

Before After

Page 4: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Remember the Results…

Follow @ShameOnUX

purchases increased 45%$15 million extra the first month. First year, the site saw an

additional $300,000,000.

Page 5: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Top Reasons Shoppers Abandon CartsAccording to Invesp

Follow @ShameOnUX

Reasons Percentage   

High Shipping Costs 44%Not Ready to purchase 41%High Product Price 25%Wish To Review Selected Products Later 24%Shipping Costs Not Clearly Mentioned 22%No Guest Checkout Option 14%Being Asked Too Much Information 12%Complex Checkout Process 11%Website Too Slow 11%Additional Costs Charged Towards Taxes 8%Insufficient Payment Options 7%Slow Shipping 6%Spam With Offers 6%Website Crashed 5%

Source: InvespRef: http://www.invesp.com/blog/cro/shopping-cart-abandonment-rate-statistics-infographic.html

Page 6: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Follow @ShameOnUX

57% – Didn’t want to pay shipping costs 48% – Total cost of purchase was more than expected 41% – Used the shopping cart for research 19% – Didn’t want to wait for the product 18% – Purchased offline instead 15% – Checkout process was too complicated 12% – Other reasons

Source: Forrester ResearchRef: http://blogs.forrester.com/reineke_reitsma/09-10-16-data_digest_shopping_cart_abandonment

Top Reasons Shoppers Abandon CartsAccording to Forrester Research

Page 7: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Top Reasons from Consumers Surveyed

Follow @ShameOnUX

Lack of return / exchange policies Security icons / signaling Privacy and trust language around fields asking for

personal data such as address, email, or credit card

Source: Marketing SherpaRef: http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.php?ident=29685

Page 8: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

No Onto The Shame Cases!

Follow @ShameOnUX

How this works…

We look at a screen capture of a broken or failed experience

We align around what’s shamefully wrong

We discuss where the experience went wrong, and what could have been done to save it.

You all become expert user experience analysts

Page 9: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 1: Lowes

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: Anthony Moore (Thanks Anthony!)

Page 10: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 1: Lowes

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: Anthony Moore (Thanks Anthony!)

Page 11: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 1: Lowes

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: Anthony Moore (Thanks Anthony!)

Page 12: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 1: Lowes

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: Anthony Moore (Thanks Anthony!)

Page 13: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 2: Gerhard’s Appliance

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 14: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 3: Best Buy

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 15: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 3: Best Buy

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 16: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 4: Project Camelot

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 17: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 4: Project Camelot

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 18: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 4: Project Camelot

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 19: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 5: Powers Motorsports

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: JT Sherk Thanks John!

Page 20: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 6: Syntec

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 21: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 6: Syntec

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 22: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 7: Connections

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 23: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 8: DrugStore.com

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: K SmithThanks K!

Page 24: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 8: DrugStore.com

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: K SmithThanks K!

Page 25: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 8: DrugStore.com

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: K SmithThanks K!

Page 26: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case 8: DrugStore.com

Follow @ShameOnUX

Submitted by: K SmithThanks K!

Page 27: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Shame Case Honorable Mentions

Follow @ShameOnUX

Page 28: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Follow @ShameOnUX

Shame Case Honorable Mentions

Page 29: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Follow @ShameOnUX

Shame Case Honorable Mentions

Page 30: Shame On UX May 2012 Meet-Up

Fin!Follow @ShameOnUX Visit ShameOnUX.com


Recommended