+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines...

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines...

Date post: 20-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 8 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
30
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 13, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE JUNE 13, 2013

Page 2: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

1. SPRC Recap

2. Guiding Principles Overview

3. Circulation Network

4. Architecture / Buildings Network

5. Open Space / Public Space Network

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Page 3: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

SPRC #3 (May 14, 2012) Site Design & Characteristics

SPRC #4 (June 11, 2012) Applicant presented revised site design

SPRC #5 (July 16, 2012) Draft design guidelines presented

SPRC #7 (Oct 18, 2012) Height, density, massing

SPRC #8 (Nov 19, 2012) Design guidelines presentation

SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments

SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013) Site design analysis by staff (framework)

SPRC #13 (April 4, 2013) Open space network

SPRC RECAP (FOCUS ON DESIGN GUIDELINES ELEMENTS)

Page 4: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

A. Compatibility

B. Mixed-use Development

C. Distribution of Densities & Heights

D. Open Space

E. Circulation & Pedestrian Routes

F. Other Elements of Good Urban Design

G. Sustainable Design

H. Accessibility

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Categories A through F were created by the Pentagon City Planning Task Force and published in the November 1997

Report of the Pentagon City Task Force but are not part of the original planning goals established in the February 1976 Pentagon City Master Development Plan.

Page 5: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

A. Compatibility

B. Mixed-use Development

C. Distribution of Densities & Heights

D. Open Space

E. Circulation & Pedestrian Routes

F. Other Elements of Good Urban Design

G. Sustainable Design

H. Accessibility

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Categories A through F were created by the Pentagon City Planning Task Force and published in the November 1997

Report of the Pentagon City Task Force but are not part of the original planning goals established in the February 1976 Pentagon City Master Development Plan.

Page 6: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

A.1. Development should create a sense of place both

internal and external to the site. It should

contribute to the sense of place and community

vitality envisioned for the entire Pentagon City

neighborhood.

A.2. High quality urban design and architectural design

should define the site.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Page 7: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

CIRCULATION NETWORK

Page 8: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

A RLIN G T ON VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

TRANSPORTATION > > > Analysis

PenPlace PDSP (future)

Streetcar Station (future)

Metropolitan Park PDSP (in development)

Pentagon Centre PDSP (distant future)

(- • • •-) North/ South Elm St Connection

East/ West 12th St Connection

Page 9: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

~ J\RL1 NGroN

'°J•Gl\1~

Vehicular/ Peclestra;,, Access Oiagrarn

• PHma'Y/ ""lti-modai co,,ido,

Secondary Access Streets

• Primary Pedestrian ,··~

• • <'-.

.. ,.,~ "' lreetcar Stat ion

Page 10: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARL I NG T ON VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

STREET SECTION: 12TH STREET

PROPOSED Mt;T PARK 9UILOJNG

eYOTHt;RS

12'

I

34'

STREET CAR LANES

77-0• l'.O.C • l'.0 C

116'·4• MIN l',0 e • I' 0 S

12'

l

P~OPOSEO PENPLACE BUILDING

•NOTE: CAFE SEATING ALONG 12TH STREET TO BE APPROVED BY A USE PERMIT

Page 11: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARCHITECTURE / BUILDINGS NETWORK

Page 12: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

BUILDING MASSING

Page 13: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

BUILDING STEPBACKS

Page 14: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARLINGTON VJRGIS I A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

BUILDINGS/ ARCHITECTURE PODIUM STEPBACK ZONES

Principal entrances for all new retail should be located on street frontaoes. Arcades on street frontages are not recommended.

Paved surfaces should extend to the build ing face, with landscaping elements limited to movable planters. Within the cafe/ d isplay zone, some fencing and partitioning between establishments may be permitted by special use permit from Arlington County. Otherwise, these areas should remain accessible for pedestrian movement.

All handicap ramps should be internal to buildings. On streets where residential buildings without a retail base occur, street frontage should express the more passive and quiet character of a residential neighborhood. To that end:

All residential lobby entrances should front onto streets.

Lobby entrances should be at grade, with a minimum clear height of 12 feet in the lobby.

VORNADO Cl>'l • R L.•5 l'..$ M l 1""1'1

--

~ ONE SECURE BUILDING SCHEME NO SECURE B UILDING SCHEME

PENPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Page 15: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARLINGTON VJRGIS I A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

BUILDINGS/ ARCHITECTURE PODIUM STEPBACK ZONES

Principal entrances for all new retail should be located on street frontaoes. Arcades on street frontages are not recommended.

Paved surfaces should extend to the build ing face, with landscaping elements limited to movable planters. Within the cafe/ d isplay zone, some fencing and partitioning between establishments may be permitted by special use permit from Arlington County. Otherwise, these areas should remain accessible for pedestrian movement.

All handicap ramps should be internal to buildings. On streets where residential buildings without a retail base occur, street frontage should express the more passive and quiet character of a residential neighborhood. To that end:

All residential lobby entrances should front onto streets.

Lobby entrances should be at grade, with a minimum clear height of 12 feet in the lobby.

VORNADO Cl>'l • R L.•5 l'..$ M l 1""1'1

PODIU M STEPBAC K ZON ES --

~ ONE SECURE BUILDING SCHEME NO SECURE B UILDING SCHEME

PENPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Page 16: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

OPEN SPACE / PUBLIC SPACE NETWORK

Page 17: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

~ ARL I NG T ON

VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

OPEN SPACE > > > Context

1 Lo ng Bridg .. Parle 5 Virgin ia Highlands Parle

4 Metropolitan Parle 6 Hooper Memorial Parle 2 Penbigon Centre POS P

PLAZAS/ SQUARES

7 Penbigon Row Pl~ 3 Crystal City Wate r Parle

8 Pen Plac e

-t.agon I

• • • . •

~IG.-.

~· Tral'ttft:ftaza

~ntaoon .:•••••••••••••• Row ........ • t2tnSt . .

. • •

Page 18: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARL I NG T ON VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

ANALYSIS > > > Urban Design Framework

BLOCKS/STREETS

ARLINGTON Vll.OINI A

OPEN SPACE/ PUBLIC REALM

PEN PLACE

COMPOSITE DIAGRAM

SPRC#10 February 25, 2013

Page 19: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARL I NG T ON VJRGIS I A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

OPEN SPACE > > > Analysis

Concept Plan

Key Plan

Page 20: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

POTOMAC YARD PDSP

Page 21: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

~ ARL I NG T ON

VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

2 - CEllTER PAJll

~erP.11\..~lll.theintenectionol O.rk-llelllOd20thS1:1~1,. ilintmdedtobe

~~~~~-:~~u En'llisi:lfleduanopenspace~acivic: c:hand:etitwilbe lhebrges.1 pari:in(iysbl Gtywith.a~sizeof74,200sqlJIR~

Ihes:=ofthe~would..,.,_.forawOe

wrietyaf~suc::has~ss#e~tioo. ethi:IMru,~!Ni-._a~some tcmponiykioskm.ti,.-S~o!Jldoor

~ll«dUSC$bl\'en.visionedonthe

north11ndeasts idrsoltiloepM1'.withlM possibility of a re;sil aratde ;:it the .-.ooh end l'llhidlmukl beenclci~ ftthewWdff f!IOJlths.A.prOtT1"-'t~rtial~cttl.nl

ftowure(:l)tlfdbeb::xedlill:the~ ~althepMll:tosign:japoSttolart.ry

.and gathering Wien arrMng from )efierson 0.,-9ou4e-nird.Ast11>nglinkbetwee:nl8th .and X'thStreetslhould *c>bea>nM:k~ withagrandstllid~ cnabat~along thc20shSt1tttfront.ogeR~asOM

CICdSibk.-~mneooti~the:Qr.ade

d~nces. M.d! of the part shUd be peniclus and ptedominMitly gram. Spec:AI olf1~«'Ukfbe~~edintothe llndsupc-lllMl~oflhe~il<>d

.vtH!:ic:lghtingshouldhigt6ghtth.epd duringthe~Cistemswithind!e

f111dM1d~ent~scotAd~ n1inwmerforparkinig.mon.Windhlrbnes .JndlorJObr~muldbeuxdinMtistic

'-rs 1oeduc.-...-Cou .ndt11 supply~ .,,,... ......

Page 22: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARL I NG T ON VJRGIS I A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

PENPLACE DESIGN GUIDELINES

SEE ENLARGEMENT ON PAGE 57

SEE ENLARGEMENT ON PAGE 54 - 56

SEE ENLARGEMENT ON PAGE 52

OPEN SPACE/ PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN FRAMEWORK: CONCEPT PLANS

The design of the buildings that line the streets will be critically important in giving an immediate impression to the public of the sort of place PenPlace will be. It is the design of the open spaces between the buildings, however, that will define the nature of the everyday experience of PenPlace to those who enter into it, whether by car, bicycle, on foot, or by streetcar.

In the section of the design guidelines that follows, the typology of these open spaces wil be discussed and defined. They range in size and complexity from the sidevvalks that promote easy and gracious movement of pedestrians around Pen Place to plazas and parks that serve as gathering places, social spaces and venues for events, fairs and performances.

PenPlace will include the full range of urban open space:

• streetscapes

• plazas • parks

private green spaces

Each has an important role to play, both in enlivening the public realm and in making it urbane and elegant. These qualities, in concert with carefully designed buildings, will be hallmarks of PenPlace, making it a desirable place to work, shop and enjoy life. This section of the design guidelines will describe each of these open space types.

VO~NADO CHA " l.E S L 8MI T H ,.

Page 23: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARLINGTON YIRLl,IA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1v1ston

Master Plan

Presanta:l to PDC for Conceptual Review on Januuy 10, 2011

Revised percomrrentsreceived from PDC, DPR, CornmunityBoard, and results of light study

Page 24: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARL I NG T ON VJRGIS I A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

.....

'I --o

J a ~

J

~l ~ 1 a ~ ~ .:r

'v'\9st 35th Street V\ttst 35th Street

Wttt33rd Street

Design Updates

Sloped Lawn and larger vegetated areas take advantage of available

sunlight

Page 25: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

1Wt-A R l I N G T Q N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Circulation Block 1

I I l

Ml• hu l VonVelbne1rfhA11•l•t 11, lno.

West. 34th Street

West 33rd Street

O'

., 11oa 110~ 110~

Bl ~0

20'

Page 26: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

~ ARL I NG T ON

VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

Page 27: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

ARLINGTON YIRLl,IA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1v1ston

Circulation Block 3

West 35th Street

11oa 10~ 1101

Bl ICIYPIAN 0

20' 40'

Page 28: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

~ ARL I NG T ON

VJRGISIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING. HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT

Planning D1vis1on

Page 29: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

CIRCULATION: WILLOUGHBY SQUARE -CIRCULATION FLOW FROM CORN ms MULTIPL£ FOCI

PROGRAM: W ILLOUGHBY SQUARE

...... --. --

·····~ ·-­··-­• . ........ _ n --

----

Page 30: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEEarlingtonva.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/...Design guidelines presentation . SPRC #9 (Jan 8, 2013) Design guidelines comments . SPRC #10 (Feb 25, 2013)

Transportation / Streets

1. Site circulation: pedestrian and vehicular

2. Connectedness to adjacent sites

Open Space / Public Realm

1. Preservation of contiguous open space

2. Activation of open space / public realm by adjacent land uses

3. Impact of building massing on the public realm

4. Use and design of the open space

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR SITING A SECURE FACILITY


Recommended