Date post: | 17-Sep-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truonghuong |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Small Wood fired Appliances:
Emission Reduction by combined Methods1 2 I.Hartmann , V. Schmatloch
1 Deutsches Biomasse Forschungszentrum gGmbH, D - 04347 Leipzig 2 Spartherm Feuerungstechnik GmbH, D - 49324 Melle
Small wood fired appliances: Common names: wood stoves, tiled stoves, fireplaces
Standardisation: room heaters, inset appliances,
inserts
Intended use: living room heating and decoration
Typical features: manually fed with batches of cord wood, natural chimney draught, manually controlled by user, operation without electric power
AcknowldegementsThe project was funded by PTJ and the German Bundesministerium für Umwelt (BMU), FKZ 03KB051
Background: Small wood fired appliances such as stoves or fireplaces
are known to contribute significantly to the PM10
concentration in ambient air of many industrialized
countries. Due to the manual operation of these
appliances, user behaviour has an important effect on
their combustion performance. Therefore technical
improvements aim at both, technical optimisation of the
combustion technology and reduction of the user
influence. In this study a standard fireplace insert was
equipped with an automatic combustion air control, that
avoids user errors regarding the air setting, an
electrostatic precipitator for reduction of particle
emissions and a catalyst for improvement of gaseous
emissions.
Project: Period: 2011 to 2014, Field tests from 2012 to 2014
Laboratory tests: unmodified appliance as reference
Field tests: optimisation and testing of different configurations, validation of final setupgas analyser Eheim VISIT 02S, Sick Maihak Sidor, particle mass by HF according to VDI 2066, particle number TSI CPC 3781
Emission reduction compared to reference:
CO ~70%, particulates ~80%
above: setup for final field tests:
fireplace insert with ESP, catalyst
and automatic air control
left: CO emission of original
fireplace insert (lab reference)
compared to field test result with
ESP on/off and with/without catalyst
right: CO emission of original
fireplace insert (lab reference)
compared to field test result with
ESP on/off and with/without catalyst
below right: typical during field test
run showing flue gas temperature
(green), oxygen concentration
(blue), CO concentration (red) and
particle number concentration
(black) for one combustion cycle
with HV of ESP off and one cycle
with HV on.
ConclusionA conventional fireplace insert has been equipped
with a catalyst, an electrostatic precipitator and a
conventional automatic combustion air control.
For this combination fitness for use has been
demonstrated for an extended period of field tests
under realistic operation conditions in the field. A
significant reduction of CO and particle emissions
has been demonstrated by field tests.
14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
refueling
CO
/m
g/m
3&
Part
icle
Num
ber
(CP
C)
time
h~65%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200ESP on
O2/%
&T
Flu
e/°
C
10*O2
TFl ue
0.1·xDil
·PN(CPC)
CO
ESP off
refueling
14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Deutsches Biomasseforschungsentrumgemeinnützige GmbH
0
50
100
150
200
LabReference
Field Ref.with HV
Field Ref.w/o HV
Catalyst &HV on
Catalyst &HV off
PM
/ m
g m
-3(i
.N.,
13
% O
2)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
LabReference
Field Ref.with HV
Field Ref.w/o HV
Catalyst &HV on
Catalyst &HV off
CO
/ m
g m
-3(i
.N., 1
3 %
O2)