Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

TRC PresentationJanuary 30, 2003

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea

Transportation StudyTransportation Study DRAFT

Regional Context

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Study Focus Area

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Population & Employment Growth

2000 Draft 2 2020

% Increase

Draft 2 2030

% Increase

POPULATION

Maricopa 361,816 790,372 118 834,113 6

Pinal 150,807 295,894 96 518,171 75

EMPLOYMENT

Maricopa 120,821 385,050 218 441,026 15

Pinal 57,728 100,880 75 185,080 83

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN

BROADWAYAPACHESUPERST ITION

BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PR

ICE

DO

BSO

N

ALM

A SC

HO

OL

ARIZO

NA

MC

QUE

EN

COO

PER

GILBER

T

LIN

DSA

Y

VAL

VISTA

GREE

NFIE

LD

HIG

LEY

REC

KE

R

PO

WE

R

SOSS

AMA

N

HAW

ES

ELLSW

ORT

H

CRISM

ON

SIG

NAL

BU

TTE

MERID

IAN

VIN

EYAR

D

8

10

2002 Network

HOV

2

4

6

8

10 - 12

Lanes

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


2002 Network Summary

MEASURE FREEWAY HOV ARTERIAL

Centerline Miles 15 0 388

Lane Miles 83 0 1250

Congested Intersections NA NA 43

Maricopa County

Pinal CountyMEASURE FREEWAY HOV ARTERIAL


Lane Miles 20 0 445


Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


10

8

VIN

EYA

RD

ME

RIDIA

N

SIG

NA

L B

UTT

E

CR

ISMO

N

ELLSW

ORT

H

HA

WES

SOSSA

MA

N

PO

WE

R

REC

KER

HIG

LEY

GR

EENFIE

LD

VA

L V

ISTA

LIN

DS

AY

GILB

ERT

CO

OPE

R

MC

QUE

EN

AR

IZO

NA

ALM

A SC

HO

OL

DO

BSO

N

PR

ICE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

MOBILE

APACHE JUNCTION

MESAGILBERT

CHANDLER

QUEEN CREEK

FLORENCE

COOLIDGECASA GRANDE

County

87

287 87

287

79

60

84

347

Future Base

Widened Segment

New Segment

• 586 miles of widened arterials• Cost = $2,637 million

• 385 miles of new arterial• 22 miles of new freeway• Cost = $1,155 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Future Base Network Summary





Cost (millions) $880 $0 $2,208

Maricopa County





Cost (millions) $0 $0 $1,590

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


10

8

VIN

EYA

RD

ME

RIDIA

N

SIG

NA

L B

UTT

E

CR

ISMO

N

ELLSW

ORT

H

HA

WES

SOSSA

MA

N

PO

WE

R

REC

KER

HIG

LEY

GR

EENFIE

LD

VA

L V

ISTA

LIN

DS

AY

GILB

ERT

CO

OPE

R

MC

QUE

EN

AR

IZO

NA

ALM

A SC

HO

OL

DO

BSO

N

PR

ICE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

MOBILE

APACHE JUNCTION

MESAGILBERT

CHANDLER

QUEEN CREEK

FLORENCE

COOLIDGECASA GRANDE

County

87

287 87

287

79

60

84

347

Enhanced Facilities

HOV Facility

New or Improved Interchange

Wi den to 4 Lanes

Wi den to 6 Lanes

Wi den to 8 Lanes and HOV

• 35 miles of highway widening• Cost = $123 million

• 42 miles of freeway widening• Cost = $336 million

• 38 miles of HOV lanes• Cost = $228 million

• New or reconstructed TI’s• Cost = $106 million

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Enhanced Network Summary



Lane Miles 301 66 2,514


Cost (millions) $330 $198 $0

Maricopa County



Lane Miles 40 10 1,894


Cost (millions) $112 $30 $0

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


347

84

60

79

287

87287

87

County

CASA GRANDECOOLIDGE

FLORENCE

QUEEN CREEK

CHANDLER

GILBERT MESA

APACHE JUNCTION

MOBILE

HUNT

RIGGS

CHANDLER HEIGHTS

OCOT ILLO

QUEEN CREEK

GERMANN

PECOS

WILLIAMS FIELD

RAY

WARNER

ELLIOT

GUADALUP E

BASELINE

SO UTHERN


BROWN

MCKELLIPS

PRIC

E

DO

BSON

ALM

A SCH

OO

L

ARIZO

NA

MC

QUE

EN

COO

PER

GILBERT

LIN

DSA

Y

VAL

VIS

TA

GREE

NFIELD

HIG

LEY

REC

KER

POW

ER

SOSS

AMA

N

HAW

ES

ELLSW

ORT

H

CRISM

ON

SIG

NAL

BU

TTE

MERID

IAN

VIN

EYARD

8

10

New Facilities

• Projected Daily Volume – 64,000 to 110,000

• Cost = $1,390 million


• Cost = $390 million

Projected Daily Volume – 46,000 to 110,000

Cost = $1,640 million

Projected Daily Volume – 60,000 to 100,000

Cost = $790 million


• Cost = $117 million

Note: Concepts on this map were received as part of the public and agency consultation process and have not been assessed or endorsed by MAG.

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


New Facilities Network Summary



Lane Miles 562 66 2,514


Cost (millions) $1,590 NA $0

Maricopa County



Lane Miles 790 10 1,894


Cost (millions) $2,620 NA $0

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Operational Comparisons

MEASURE 2000 NETWORK

FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW

CORRIDORS

VMT (million) 11.4 25.8 25.7 27.0

Lane Miles - V/c >.9 240 475 406 356

Congested Intersections 43 80 69 64

Cost (millions) NA $3,088 $528 $1,590

Maricopa County

Pinal County

MEASURE 2000 NETWORK

FUTURE BASE ENHANCED NEW

CORRIDORS

VMT (million) 2.5 8.5 7.5 7.5

Lane Miles - V/c >.9 159 303 185 33

Congested Intersections 0 2 3 1

Cost (millions) NA $1,590 $142 $2,620

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Proposed Regional Connections

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Local Network & Rural Transit Access

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Study Corridors

Light Rail/Bus Rapid Transit: Union Pacific Chandler Branch Chandler Blvd. Main Street Power

Commuter Rail: UP Southeast

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


Draft Network

Sout

heas

t M

aric

opa

/ Nor

ther

n Pi

nal C

ount

y So

uthe

ast

Mar

icop

a / N

orth

ern

Pina

l Cou

nty

Are

aA

rea


High Capacity Corridor Cost

UP Mainline Chandler - $226 to $530 million Chandler Boulevard - $306 to $684 million Main Street – $185 to $374 million Power Road - $237 to $465 million UP Southeast - $567 million

TOTAL - $1.5 to $2.6 billion

Date post:	10-Feb-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	anais
View:	47 times
Download:	0 times

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

Documents