Date post: | 28-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tanvir-chowdhury |
View: | 20 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PROGRESS REPORT 5DECEMBER 2011
SPEMP Secretariat
ContentsSummary 1
A Closer Look at Project Details 5
Deepening MTBF and Strengthening Financial Accountability Strengthening the Office of Comptroller and Auditor General Strengthening Parliamentary Oversight Glimpses of Just-in-time Technical and Analytical Assistance 14 Citizens’ Component Regional Conference on Public Investment Management Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) Review of MTBF (draft) New PFM Initiatives within and beyond SPEMP 20 Strengthening Statregic Planning and Public Investment Management Revenue Administration Refom
SPEMP Knowledge Exchange Visits 22
Financial Updates 24
Annex 1: Restructured Implementation Arrangement for DMTBF Project 25
Annex 2: Revised Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for DMTBF Project 26
1
SUMMARY:Implementing to raise accountability to citizens
SPEMP has seen some very busy months during the second half of 2011. The range of activities has stretched from major decisions on expediting implementation through more coordinated work on achievable outcomes, and subsequently, regular working level meetings, workshops on ways forward, conferences with regional affilia-tions, exposures into international experiences of public financial management (PFM), showcasing country systems and updates and many more.
DMTBF Project restructured to three components from nine; finalization on way: The DMTBF Project that has come across a number of significant achieve-ments including complete roll out of the MTBF across government, support to Budget FY 2012, and Sixth Five Year Plan, stabilization and maintenance of iBAS, a significant number of training programs having trained close to 2,000 officials across government, and valuable diagnostic work in the areas of debt management, PFM regulations, payroll and pensions was also facing rather slow or stunted progress in many of its nine components. The problems were identified to be overambitious and complicated project design, difficult implementation arrangements that hampered coordinated teamwork of a very large number of stakeholders, reform champions and consultants.
Following comprehensive workshops for restructure with participation of all stakeholders within government, donors and consultants in July 2011 and in September 2011, the DMTBF Project was proposed to be restructured into three components from the original nine to coincide with the governments three broad areas of focus: MTBF, iBAS, and human resource capacity building. No major work area was eliminated, but ‘repackaged’ to promote better coordination and synergy. Currently, administrative and legal procedures to finalize restructure of the project on behalf of the Bank and Government are being worked upon.
Public Finance Foundation (PFF) decided to be built into an institute with changed governance structure and broadened focuswith effect from July 2012: As part of the DMTBF Project, steps on reorganizing and strengthening PFF have been identified. In order to explore the options and actionplan further with ideas from key stakeholders, a workshop titled ‘Restructuring of Public Finance Foundation’ was arranged in October 2011. The workshop recommended broadening PFF’s focus to include the entire cycle of PFM and simplifying the governance structure with effect from July 2012, and actually taking an institutional form by the time DMTBF Project ends.
Improving implementation pace of Strengthening Parliamentary Oversight (SPO) Project despite initial slow progress fueled by insufficient reform exposure of Parliament Secretariat: The implementation status so far has been quite slow due to limited previous experience of Parliament Secretariat to reform. Prog-ress however is picking up including establishing client connection e-submission of IFR based withdrawal application.
2
...SUMMARY
Commendable start up pace of Strengthening the Office of Comptroller and Auditor General (SOCAG) Project in contracting Management and Imple-mentation Support Consultancy (MISC): Despite long preparation time, the SOCAG has picked up pace in starting up to begin implementation. Office of the Comp-troller and Auditor General (OCAG) negotiated a contract with the winning bidder - PKF (UK) LLP just within a period of 93 days from the project effectiveness and well directed efforts are in place to have the consultant in place by January 1, 2012.
Shifted focus of SPEMP’s Citizens’ Component has yielded greater commu-nication activities for and between projects, including preparation of a ‘citizens’ budget’ in collaboration with DMTBF Project: The SPEMP communi-cation team has been actively engaged with the three projects in order to come up with practical outreach activities for each. The team is currently helping Finance Division to develop a Citizen's Guide to Budget Pamphlet for FY11-12. Along with this, various other communication plans have been arranged which are going to roll out throughout the coming year.
Regional Public Investment Management (PIM) experience explored through regional PIM Conference in Dhaka: SPEMP in collaboration with the Planning Commission held a regional conference on Public Investment Management (PIM) in Dhaka on September 14-15, 2011. The conference yielded findings on enhanc-ing public investment management.
Completion of the review of the first phase of Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) on Roads and Highways: The SPEMP led a study to review on road and highway department (RHD) through Ernst and Young, who is a contractor for this survey. The study reviews various business processes of RHD. After completion of the initial phase, a review of the methodology was carried out by the Bank.
Increased support for enhanced and unified understanding of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E): In order to create greater awareness and understanding among the officials and consultants of the three PMCUs of SPEMP on the function of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) frameworks, a training session on M&E was held at the Bank in August, 2011.
Increased support for enhanced and unified understanding of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E): In order to create greater awareness and understanding among the officials and consultants of the three PMCUs of SPEMP on the function of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) frameworks, a training session on M&E was held at the Bank in August, 2011.
Exposure to international experience on PFM through knowledge exchange with relevant PFM authorities in South Africa, Malaysia and Korea and participation in International Consortium of Government Financial Management (ICGFM): A team from the Finance Division visited National Treasury of the Government of South Africa in July 2011 to discuss and share PFM reform experiences with related South African National Treasury Counterparts.
3
...SUMMARY
From this knowledge exchange visit, the delegates have gained an important understanding of the role of performance management in the improvement of returns to resource allocation. It created a great possibility to develop a continuous experience sharing relationship and to bring in some of the reform issues into the Bangladesh PFM reform process, that are successfully implemented in South Africa. A team composed of officials from Ministry of Planning, Planning Commission. Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED) and Finance Division visited Malaysia and Korea in August 2011 to gain exposure in the area of regional public investment management (PIM). During this knowledge exchange visit, delegates gained insight on all stages on investment project management cycle starting with screen and selection with respect to national priorities, appraisal, approval, implementation, maintenance and impact evaluation. Authorities visited in Malaysia were Ministry of Economic Planning Unit, Ministry of Finance, Implementation Coordination Unit and Ministry of Works that controls six agencies; Ministry of Finance and Strategy and Korea Development Institute’s Public Infrastructure Management Center (PIMAC).
Finally during December 5-7, 2011, DMTBF and SPO Project representatives participated in the ICGFM Conference in Washington DC and besides presenting an innovative approach to improving accountability in PFM, also comprehensively and candidly presented the case of Bangladesh on the current state and reform history in the area of PFM and financial accountability.
A Closer Look at Project Details
5
Deepening MTBF and Strengthening Financial Ac-countability (DMTBF) Project
Progress/Achievements
Complete roll out of MTBF across government to 57 ministries and divisions, ahead of schedule
Support to preparation of Annual Budget FY2012
Support to completion of Sixth Five Year Plan
Stabilization and maintenance of iBAS
Training in relevant PFM areas to over 1,500 officials across gov-ernment
Valuable diagnostics in the areas of debt management, treasury and cash management, payroll and pensions
6
...DMTBF Project
Changes/Decisions
i. Restructured Components
C1: Strategic Budget Management in Finance Division
C2: Developing Capacities for Debt Policy and Management
C3: Capacity Development in Line Ministries
C4: Developing Planning Commission Capacity in line with the MTBF approach C5: Accounting and Financial Reporting
C6: Strengthening Treasury and Cash Management Systems
C7: PFM Legislation and Regulations
C8: Payroll, Pensions, GPF, Loans & Advances, and Assets
C9: Training & Human Resources Development
C1: Strategic Policy and Budget Management
C2: Public Financial Systems
C3: Capacity Building and
Training
Strengthening Strategic Planning and Public
Investment Management
Note: The subcomponent on Planning Commission has been narrowed down within the DMTBF Project and most analytical activities have been included under a separate work program under SPEMP. A transitional arrangement however has been set up through which the new work program and DMTBF Project will coordinate at least at the initial stage.
7
...DMTBF Project
Changes/Decisions
DMTBF Project has had significant achievements in ways of complete MTBF roll out, support to completion of 6th Five Year Plan and annual Budget 2012, stabilization and maintenance of iBAS, unified presentation of development and non-development budgets in FY12 and significant training. Considerable diagnostics also have been completed in key PFM areas in all components of the project. Nevertheless, the project has been facing slow progress in many areas of its scope despite completion of diagnostics either because of shifted priority of government, uncoordinated components, compli-cated implementation arrangements, limited scope of involvement government reform champions etc. Consequently, the project has been rearranged in three main broad categories of government priority i.e. MTBF, iBAS, human resource capacity building. Other components and subcomponents have been placed according to relevance with each of the broad components.
The Planning Commission (PC) component under DMTBF Project was focused mostly on the General Economic work of PC, leaving out a crucial area of PFM i.e. public investment management. In addition, implementation of the PC component has faced considerable institutional differences and therefore, prog-ress has been slow, albeit DMTBF Project’s contribution in finalizing the sixth Five Year Plan by General Economics Division (GED) of PC. Recognizing PC’s importance as the national institute of strategic planning and public investment management, came the idea of a separate project (described later) in line with PC’s unique priorities, expected to start in early 2012, under SPEMP. However, in order to maintain consistency with MTBF, DMTBF Project will continue to support PC’s results based monitoring of the 6th Five Year Plan till July 2012 after which the new project will take on this initiative as well.
ii. Special measures were taken to speed up finalization of proj-ect restructure details on an urgent basis, as a results of Restructur-ing Workshop held in September September 2011:
a. Committee for finalizing Implementation Arrangement: Finance Division formed a Committee on September 15, 2011 consisting of Mr. Md. Najmus Sakib and Mr. Md. Zahidul Haque (Finance Division), Mr. Muslim Chowdhury and Dr. Ziaul Abedin (MISC), Ms. Suraiya Zannath, Ms. Dilshad Dossani (World Bank), Mr. Syed Abu Yousuf and Mr. Ataur Rahman (DMTBF PMCU).
8
...DMTBF Project
Changes/Decisions
Mr. Shahabuddin Ahmed, Joint Secretary, Finance Division will be Chairing the committee. The committee has been assigned to review and finalize the restructured implementation that was proposed by the Bank and agreed in principle by FD. The Committee has held several meetings, analyzed the proposed management structure very cautiously and discussed different issues related to the implementation arrangement. The committee also talked to a number of project stakeholders and incorporated the views in the revised struc-ture (attached as Annex 1).
b. Progress on results framework revision and Committee assigned for the revision Results Framework of DMTBF Project: Finance Division formed a second committee as a result of the restructure work-shop held on September 10, 2011. This committee was assigned to finalize the ‘Monitoring and Evaluation framework’ of DMTBF Project. The committee consists of Dr. Ahsan Mansur and Mr. Md. Muslim Chowdhury (MISC), Ms. Dilshad Dossani (World Bank), Mr. Md. Habibur Rahman and Mr. Md. Saiful Islam (Finance Division), and Dr. Golam Morshed and Muhammad Ali (DMTBF PMCU). Mr. Najmus Sakib, Joint Secretary, Finance Division has been assigned as Chair of the committee. This committee too has held several meetings in the month of September and October 2011 through which the draft M&E framework developed by the Bank was discussed and suggestions and inputs provided in the forms of targets from Component Directors for each of their respective compo-nents. It was agreed that there will be two sets of formats: for overall project progress monitoring periodically, a summary version that will be shared every quarter with the Bank and Donors and a tracking table with a higher number of indicators and detailed information, which will be used at the implementation level for regular monitoring by FD, PMCU and MISC. The final Monitoring and Evaluation table will be discussed and approved in the next joint Government-Donor meeting, planned to be held in January 2012. The revised M&E format is provided in Annex 2.
9
...DMTBF Project
Events
iii. Workshops on DMTBF Restructuring: Subsequent to the initial restructure workshop in July 2011, stakeholders of DMTBF project agreed on the restructuring outline for the project in a workshop on September 10, 2011 at Hotel Westin, Dhaka. It was a follow-up action of the first workshop on restruc-turing held in July in Cox’s Bazar. Officials from the Finance Division and MTBF line ministries, CGA Office, representatives from the development partners and the Management and Implementation Support Consultants Team participated in the workshop. The Finance Secretary joined the Program as the Chief Guest. The purpose of the Retreat Workshop was to provide response to the diagnostic exercise carried out by the SPEMP-A Team (PDP Australia) and to work out a sensible way forward to achieve the ultimate objectives of the DMTBF Project. Another important purpose of the workshop was to review the current compo-nents structure of the Project, to work out a restructuring proposal to maximize cohesion among the project components and to ensure measurable time-bound outputs. Also, based on the Implementation support and project restructuring mission findings, Suraiya Zannath, Sr. Financial Management Specialist of World Bank, presented component-wise current status along with recommenda-tions for way forward, restructured implementation arrangement and challenges for the project. The development partners emphasized on well documentation of restructuring need, identification of the priority issues, risk analysis to avoid further restructuring and developing a comprehensive set of monitoring tools.
iv. Project Steering Committee Meeting: The third meeting of the Project Steering Committee (PSC) of the DMTBF project was held on November 16, 2011 with the Finance Secretary as the Chair. The Finance Secretary high-lighted the background of Public Financial Management (PFM) reform initia-tives in Bangladesh and shed light on the probable course of current and future PFM reform initiatives acknowledging that there are certain limitations and challenges against those initiatives. The Country Director of World Bank was also present and stressed on the importance of SPEMP to realize the targeted reform initiatives and expressed satisfaction to the fact that the Government wholeheartedly owned the initiatives. She highlighted that it was important to have a good harmonious relationship among all the stakeholders of the project to attain the outputs and outcomes agreed on.
10
...DMTBF Project
Events
During the meeting, five presentations were made on areas of restructuring the project; implementation arrangements and resource planning; and work plans of the three components. At the end, the restructuring report was approved by the Finance Secretary. It may be mentioned that in July and September, two workshops were held to discuss the diagnostic report and restructuring plans.
v. Workshop on “Restructuring of Public Finance Foundation” held: A workshop on “Restructuring of Public Finance Foundation” was held under the auspices of DMBTF project on October 8, 2011 at the conference room of PMCU in Dhaka. To make Public Finance Foundation (PFF) operational, a few options were reviewed and steps taken for reorganizing and strengthening PFF and hence the workshop was a part of that initiative through which ideas were drawn from the key stakeholders. Dr. Mohammad Tareque, Secretary of Finance Division chaired the workshop and it was well participated by executive committee members of PFF, senior officials of FD, relevant ministries and also representatives from the development partners besides PMCU and MISC.
The discussants highlighted the importance of institutions like PFF for the government and mentioned that in spite of significant achievements attained through various PFM reform initiatives in Bangladesh, institutional reforms are highly required. Mr. Iqbal Abdullah Harun, Component Director, Component 3 (restructured) of DMTBF Project, laid out proposals for PFF including its gover-nance structure, plan for diversifying the institution, institutional objectives & activities, funding arrangement and a time-bound action plan necessary for restructuring and making PFF operational. The legal instrument, organizational structure and financial arrangements were crucial areas needing decision. Major decisions taken were that PFF would have streamlines governance arrange-ments and actually turn into a PFM research and training institute with a broad-ened scope of work of what currently is little more than limited training to officials. It was also decided that PFF would begin operating under revised arrangements with effect from July 2012.
11
...DMTBF Project
Events
vi. SPEMP Restructuring Meeting with Heads of SPEMP Donor Agen-cies: A meeting was held with the SPEMP Heads of Agencies on September 8, 2011 at IFC to stocktake SPEMP’s progress and explore ideas and opinions on way forward. Besides the Donor Heads, the World Bank Country Director, Ms. Ellen Goldstein and the entire SPEMP Team participated in the meeting. The meeting strongly endorsed the proposed restructuring option for the DMTBF Project and agreed to stay engaged in the Planning Commission for public investment reform through modest size Bank-executed SPEMP resources. On revenue administration reform, the importance of NBR reform was agreed upon but no consensus was reached as to whether revenue reform can be supported under the SPEMP umbrella. Later however, through supporting information requested at the meeting and following further discussion, the revenue administration component was decided to be worked upon beyond the scope of SPEMP.
vii. Certificate Giving Ceremony of FEEM course under DMTBF Project held: A Certificate giving ceremony for the participants of 8th course on “Fiscal Economics and Financial Management” was held in October 2011 at DMTBF Project in Dhaka. Finance Secretary Dr. Mohammad Tareque was the Chief Guest and handed over the certificates. A total of 28 officials from different cadres of Bangladesh Civil Service participated in this ten weeks course. PFF organized the course under the auspices of DMTBF Project.
viii. Monitoring and Evaluation Training: A training session on Monitoring and Evaluation was held on August 24, 2011 at World Bank Office. The training was conducted by Mr. William Eckert, Consultant. The participants were officials and consultants from the three PMCUs of SPEMP. The main objective of the training was to create an awareness and understanding of how the Monitoring & Evaluation framework actually works. As a follow up to the training, Dilshad Dossani tried to clarify some confusion between outputs and outcomes and explained the basic system of M&E throughout the week, especially to the project staff and the M&E specialist working in the DMTBF project.
12
...DMTBF Project
Way Forward
With refocused design of project in line with defined government priorities and renewed ownership shown by FD, DMTBF Project aims to realistically work towards many of the PFM reform goals of the government with renewed vigor. Revised TAPP for the project is soon to be finalized whilst on the other hand, paper of restructure and necessary amendments are being worked upon by the Bank. Neverthe-less, the project is not being delayed due to restructure related formalities and has already begun operating under the restructured mode with Component Direc-tors appointed. The Component Directors, who have been nominated by FD itself in recognition of their roles as ‘reform champions’ are being counted upon to spear-head the project, linking technical expertise of the MISC to actual country context and priorities, whilst the Project Director oversees the project as a whole in terms of substantive and fiduciary arrangements. With refocused accountability and clear lines of authority, implementation of the project is likely to be more effective under restructured arrangements. Project Financial Updates (US$)
Actual Disbursements (DMTBF Project)
Planned Disbursements (DMTBF Project)
FY2010 7,366,996.35 5,032,000.00 FY2011 6,782,690.53 14,585,000.00 FY2012 ( till Dec 2011)
5,427,333.49 16,523,000.00
FY2013 17,018,000.00 FY2014 13,090,000.00 Total 19,577,020.37 66,248,000.00
13
Strengthening Parliamentary Oversight (SPO) Project
Implementation status so far has been slow with respect to ‘starting’ up time. The project being the first ever donor funded program implemented directly by the Parliament Secretariat (PS) its limited exposure to Government’s and Donors’ policies and procedures associated with development project poised a great concern about its ability to implement and monitor project activities in a timely manner. Despite the limitation, the project moved reasonably well within a short period of project implementation in following areas (i) formation of a full-fledged task team consisting of serving government officials as well as externally hired personnel (ii) opening of project’s Designated Account for the first time in any PS managed program in accordance with existing rules (iii) formation of project Steering committee includ-ing procurement evaluation committees and holding of regular meetings (iv) initiation of all major procurement processes and (v) a full-fledged project office, a competing demand that PS has been finding great difficulty in meeting with other donor funded projects. The project also performed well in quickly establishing client connection including e-submission of IFR based withdrawal application.
On the technical contents, significant progress has been seen on reducing audit backlog though the project’s contribution in this regard is limited to “lessons learnt” from various regional seminars and study tours. A major portion of audit backlog was done. A number of other initiatives undertaken under the project include (i) Creation of Asia Regional Association of PACs (ARAPAC) network and (ii) Formulation of a restructure plan for PS Support system to finance committees.
Project Financial Updates (US$) Actual
Disbursements (SPO Project)
Planned Disbursements (SPO Project)
FY2011 150,998 1,750,000 FY2012 ( till Dec 2011)
52,881 1,500,000
FY2013 1,250,000 FY2014 500,000 Total 5,000,000
Glimpses of SPEMP’s
Just-in-time Technical and Analytical Assistance
15
Citizens’ Component
The SPEMP communication team has been engaged with the three proj-ects in order to come up with practical outreach activities for each.
In cooperation with and following request of FD a Citizens’ Guide to Budget Pamphlet for FY11-12 is being developed. The pamphlet is expected to make national budget simple and easy for citizens, promoting greater access to reader friendly information, enhancing transparency and accountability in PFM. The draft is near completion, format has been approved by Finance Secretary and the Pamphlet is expected to be published soon.
An SMS Campaign is being executed with two blasts sent till date for C&AG, to familiarize citizens with the functions of C&AG and Parliament. These are likely to sensitize Government-to-citizen communication enabling better dissemination of information already available through government websites but not used due to lack of information of citizens about the availability.
A national debate competition among university students has been held to sensitize the youth about PFM related issues. The competition was carried out in cooperation with Dhaka University Debating Society (DUDS) in participation of Dhaka University, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), North South University and United International University. The final debate was held on December 22, 2011, at the Business Studies Faculty of the University of Dhaka. The Champion team was Dhaka University against United International University on the topic of Lack of coordination between the concerned parliamentary standing commit-tees and ministries is the key impediment towards people’s welfare. The debates are expected to be aired on Bangla Vision television channel tentatively in mid January 2012.
• Befofof re sending out of any sms, the total number of visitors to www.cag.org.bd on 29November, 2011, 9:40pm was 39,625.
• Aftftf er completion of the sms campaign, on 13 December, 12:00am, the number ofvisitors to the website has reached a cumulative total of 64,302
• Highest count of visitors – 3689 on 30 November, 2011, the fofof llowing day of 1st smslaunch.
• Average Hits per day with SMS – 2067
• Average hits per day without sms - 1556
16
...Citizens’ Component
• Only the concerned parliamentary standing committees can make the govern-ment obligated to eradicate corruption; bring transparency, accountability and ensure cost-effectiveness in public financial management.
• Audit reports should be published through mass media
• Only playing roles of the concerned parliamentary standing committees in accordance with ‘rules of business’ can ensure the ultimate welfare of the citizens of this country
• Meticulous and accountable auditing procedure can guarantee the transparent and strong public financial management system.
A coordination workshop among the three public finance committees of Parliament is being planned to be organized for better understanding of their respective roles and coordination.
SPEMP Citizens’ Component also plans to produce documentary films as well as other communication materials such as Posters, Stickers, Brochures, Leaf-lets for disseminating previous experiences, present status and ongoing activities of the projects, and future strategies of both SOCAG and SPO Projects.
In order to better coordinate and supervise communication activities and taking account of the fact that communication needs of projects may not be anticipated well in advance and there may not be regular activities, the SPEMP Citizens’ Compo-nent contract that is being implemented by Mott MacDonald and Bitopi Advertising Ltd. has been revised. The revision includes changes in terms of payment mode from time based to ‘deliverable’ based. In this way, the Joint Venture will be paid for only those activities that are delivered.
Regional Conference on Public Investment Management (PIM) SPEMP in collaboration with the Planning Commission held a regional confer-ence on Public Investment Management (PIM) in Dhaka on September 14-15, 2011. The Conference was inaugurated by the Honorable Ministers of Planning and Finance, Bangladesh, and was attended by senior officials responsible for PIM, representatives of development partners and local media. The conference yielded some common findings and recommendations through presentations by each participant from Malaysia, Korea, Philippines, India, Turkey, Vietnam, and Bangladesh.
17
...Regional Conference on Public Investment Management (PIM)
capital projects, efficient and transparent procurement and contracting process, efficient management of Public Private Partnership (PPP) and effective monitoring and evaluation. Key areas for improving PIM in Bangladesh include improving the quality of spending; strengthening capacity to identify, appraise, and select the best projects through standard appraisal guide-line; rationalizing the number of projects; improving coordination between the development and revenue budgets; development spending should be fully aligned with Five Year Plan and the Medium Term Budget Framework; strengthening project implementation, including furthering procurement reform; strengthening partnership with civil society and NGOs; and ensuring sufficient operations and maintenance funding.
Findings from this Conference are that closing infrastructure gaps is a critical factor of growth and development and that in this, public investment has a key role to play – provided the right projects are selected, and that they are implemented well nd the completed assets are effectively operated and maintained. Common challenges identified in the region were strengthen-ing quality of technical appraisal of projects, ensur-ing onsistency between the development goals, priorities and project selection, adequate funding for ti n a n
The conference ended with valuable exposure of Bangla-desh at the regional level with useful insights on regional experiences. It may be useful to further pursue the network affiliations created to facilitate further knowl-edge exchange on PIM and strategic planning. The conference built up further on the PIM review carried out by SPEMP on Bangladesh on May 2011 and supplemented the knowledge exchange visit to Korea and Malaysia (details provided later) carried out by officials from Ministry of Planning, Planning Commission and Ministry of Finance of Bangladesh. Together, these activities have contribued towards developing the poposed workplan for Planning Commission for further intervention by SPEMP.
18
Public Expenditure Tracking Survey
As the SPEMP-funded and transport team-led study to review on Roads and Highways Department (RHD) was out, a presentation from the Ernst and Young, the consultant for this survey, was held on August 24, 2011 for World Bank Officials. The study reviews various business processes of RHD. It addresses issues such as planning, programming, and execution of RHD for making road conditions better in Bangladesh. The presentation was prepared to make a broad dissemination of these findings, to probe their methodology and to seek comments from the Bank audience before it was presented to the Development Partners and eventually to the Government.
Review of MTBF in Draft phase
A review of the MTBF being implemented in Bangladesh since FY2006 was carried out under SPEMP during the August implementation support mission for DMTBF Project, and subsequent thorough analytical reviews and information from FD. The findings are still at draft phase, yet to be shared with the government. Nevertheless, so far, deviations of annual budget from the outer years of the MTBF projections are seen to have declined signifi-cantly since FY2006 to FY2012, especially taking account of the larger number of ministries and division under MTBF every year. However, alignment of budget allocation to policy so far indicates scope of improvement. Detailed findings are expected to be formally shared with FD in early 2012.
New Initiatives
20
Proposed Project for the Planning Commission: The Planning Commission (PC), since its inception in early 1970s, continues to be a pivotal institute in the development of the country. PC’s strategic plan-ning, development project management and overseeing of the development budget through administration of the Annual Development Programme (ADP) have been indispensible. However, these are some of the imperative areas that need support for strengthening. The PC component under DMTBF Project as described above has not been sufficient and therefore, a separate set of activities is being prepared under SPEMP, to be implemented by the Bank in cooperation with PC. A mission was fielded to design this workplan in close consultation with PC during November 13-17, 2011. The mission met relevant stakeholders including officials from the Planning Commission and the Planning Division of the Ministry of Planning as well as from the Finance Division and Economic Relations Division of the Ministry of Finance. Relevant officials from a number of line ministries and agencies were also consulted to complete the cycle of project management.
Based on the findings at the three tiers i.e. agency, ministry and Planning Commission, and PIM review, knowledge exchange visit and PIM regional conference, a project to strengthen PIM, strategic planning and macroeconomic model-ing has been proposed. Given the PC’s lack of exposure to reform projects so far and unfamiliarity with the Bank’s implementation and disbursement policies, the proposed project is planned to be executed by the Bank in consultation with the PC. Under such circumstances, the regular documentation requirements of government executed projects (TAPP-Technical Assistance Project Pro-forma) will not be binding (though PC may prepare them if preferred) and most of the documentation will be prepared and maintained by the Bank, using PC inputs. The workplan now awaits comments and finalization by PC after which the Bank executed project may begin immediately. Coor-dinated steps are being taken to ensure seamless transition arrangements of ongoing PC activities (so far focused mostly on General Economics Division - GED) from DMTBF Project to this new project.
SPEMP particularly acknowledges the invaluable inputs of DANIDA represen-tative (Programme Officer), Mr. Md. Ashrafuzzaman in the PC mission and constant ongoing advice on next steps of the proposed project through his technical experience in this area as well as close affiliation with PC.
Component 1: Strengthening Strategic Planning & Monitoring for Results (SPM) 1.1 Establish Macro-economic framework/ models for strategic planning(MEF)1.2 Formulate sector-specific operational plan for implementing FYP(SOP) 1.3 Develop and institutionalize framework for monitoring development results(DRF)
Component 2: Improving Public Investment Management for delivering Results (PIM) 2.1 Prepare Multi-Year Rolling Public Investment Program (PIP) for linking Annual Development Program (ADP) with FYP 2.2 Develop and operationalize guidelines for selection, formulation, appraisal and approval for improving quality of public investment(GPIM) 2.3 Qualitative Improvement of ADP Implementation (QADP)
Knowledge Exchange Visits
22
South Arican Treasury - DMTBF Project
Bangladesh has been trying to improve its PIM owing to its consistent short-coming in fully utilizing its development budget. There have been various reviews including a most recent one by SPEMP done by consultants Murray Petrie and Mohammad Mesbahuddin. This review used an ‘eight- phased’, should have features of PIM framework recently developed by the World Bank and used in various countries across the world to assess the PIM situation in Bangladesh. In light of that review and the Planning Commission’s own insights, further concrete steps on supporting PIM are being considered. In doing so, the need for hands on insights from the region were deemed necessary and thus, a knowledge exchange visit of a high level delegation of the Ministry of Planning and Planning Commission with representation from Ministry of Finance, supported by SPEMP took place during August 7-12, 2011. Lessons learned for Bangladesh are that there should be close monitoring of implementation, strate-gic business plans for line ministries should be developed, and an independent institute for project appraisal, beyond political influence should be set up. These lessons laid the base for the regional conference in September 2011 and have created a momentum of reform that has fed into the proposed project workplan developed in close consultation with Planning Commission officials.
International Consortium for Government Financial Man-agement (ICGFM) - DMTBF and SPO Projects
The ICGFM Winter Conference was held in Washington DC during December 5-7, 2011. The ICGFM called for proposals on enhancing accountability in PFM and the idea proposed from Bangladesh was a citizens’ poll on public service delivery perfor-mance before every annual budget and subsequent inclusion of the results in the overall evaluation of each relevant ministry’s central performance evaluation. For this however, the idea stressed that the existence of measurable and specific Key Perfor-mance Indicators (KPIs) are required which at this point are being strengthened for Bangladesh. Moving on to the Bangladesh scenario, a complete description of the PFM cycle in Bangladesh was given followed by an account of Bangladesh’s attempts to promote accountability and transparency in public finance. It was noted that the PFM system capacity in Bangladesh including improvement of the quality of KPIs before such an open measure of accountability by involving citizens could be implemented.
SPEMP Projects that represented Bangladesh and gave comprehensive presentations at this conference were DMTBF and SPO.
23
Investment and Planning Institutes in Korea and Malaysia
Bangladesh has been trying to improve its PIM owing to its consistent short-coming in fully utilizing its development budget. There have been various reviews including a most recent one by SPEMP done by consultants Murray Petrie and Mohammad Mesbahuddin. This review used an ‘eight- phased’, should have features of PIM framework recently developed by the World Bank and used in various countries across the world to assess the PIM situation in Bangladesh. In light of that review and the Planning Commission’s own insights, further concrete steps on supporting PIM are being considered. In doing so, the need for hands on insights from the region were deemed necessary and thus, a knowledge exchange visit of a high level delegation of the Ministry of Planning and Planning Commission with representation from Ministry of Finance, supported by SPEMP took place during August 7-12, 2011. Lessons learned for Bangladesh are that there should be close monitoring of implementation, strate-gic business plans for line ministries should be developed, and an independent institute for project appraisal, beyond political influence should be set up. These lessons laid the base for the regional conference in September 2011 and have created a momentum of reform that has fed into the proposed project workplan developed in close consultation with Planning Commission officials.
24
Financial Updates of SPEMP (US$) December 28, 2011
Investment Income 412,886
Contributions (Cash + unpaid contributions) 112,402,712
Cash Contributions 47,709,857
Unpaid contributions 64,692,856
Activities Disbursements Remaining Commitments
Expected Commitments
Deepening MTBF and Strengthening Financial Accountability Project
19,577,020 30,422,980 17,170,000
Strengthening Office of Comptroller and Auditor General Project
1,316,656 8,658,344 6,625,000
Strengthening Parliamentary Oversight Project 203,879 4,796,121 - Citizens’ Component 601,501 1,284,075 - iBAS Review 25,186 - - Public Expenditure Tracking Survey 26,394 143,055 - Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA), 2010
70,147 99,853 -
Review of MTBF and PIM 116,950 8,108 Proposed Strengthening Strategic Planning and Public Investment Management
2,500,000
Public Sector Wagebill Review 120,000 Problems and prospects of public sector audit 50,000 Survey of Public Perception of PFM 100,000
Total for projects 21,937,733 45,412,536 26,565,000
Project supervision and operational expenses 2,642,050 Trust Funds Administrative fees (0.61% of total pledge and management fees)
685,657
Total for non-project items 3,327,707
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 25,265,440
Balance Available for Disbursement 24,569,153
Beginning Of Period 29,146,892 End of period 24,569,153
25
ANNEX 1:
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
. Restructured Implementation Arrangement of DMTBF Project
Finance Division
Project Executive Committee
(headed by Additional Secretary,
Steering Committee
Donor
Project Coordinator, MISC-with direct links to consultants (marked in green)
Director, Component-1 Director, Component-2 Director, Component-3
MTFF Legislation Budget/
Debt Mgt. FSMU/
IBAS++/
GFMIS PFF/
Tech. Advisor
FD (related wings)
Int. & National
Consultan
FD Tech. Advisor
FD Tech. Advisor
FD Tech. Advisor
FD Tech. Advisor
Tech.
i
FD Tech. Advisor
PFF Int. & National
Consultants
CGA Staff
Int. & National
Consultants
Int. & National Consultants
CGA Staff
Int. & National
Consultants
Debt Mgt. Wing
Int. & National
Consultants
Int. & National
Consultants
Policy
Planning Comm.
PC Tech. Advisor
Rele-vant
wings of PC
Int. & National
Consultants
IT Manager
Budget wing
Int. & National Consultants
Project Director/PMCU Line Ministry
Macro
FD
Macro Eco
Wing
(MEW)
26
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
A. Overall assessments of the project ( Outcome / higher level output )
Com
pone
nt no
.
Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al in
FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Co
mpo
nent
no. 1
1. Macroeconomic stability
• Deviation between forecasts in the original MTMF and actual numbers for:
o Budget deficit to GDP (as % of GDP ) 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 FD
o Current Account Balance (as % of GDP ) 3.5 -2.7 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.2 FD
2. Fiscal sustainability • Change in the ratio of total
interest payments/total government expenditure as compared to the baseline ratio
0.146 -16.7%
-24.8%
-29.5%
-28.1%
-30.3%
FD
3. Improving accountability & transparency in budget process
• Percentage variance between the original budget and actual budget out-turn for the previous FY
8.1% 8.1% 7% 6% 5% 5%
FD
Com
pone
nt no
. 1
4. Strengthening linkage between planning and budgeting
• Budget documents are presented in the unified format of revenue and capital(Y/N)
No No Yes Yes Yes Yes FD
• No of LM prepared Medium Term Strategic and Business Plans
Nil Nil 1 4 5 FD, LM
Com
pone
nt no
. 2
5. Improving accounting and financial reporting
• Enhanced iBAS system developed No
No No
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
FD
• New budget classification system introduced No
No No - - Yes FD
• Identify instant cash position
of the government through enhanced iBAS system
No
No No No No Yes
FD
27
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
A. Overall assessments of the project ( Outcome / higher level output )
Com
pone
nt n
o. Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al i
n FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Com
pone
nt n
o. 2
• Submission and re-appropriation of budget electronically from any pay point level
No
No No
- Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Consolidated financial /fiscal reports produced from enhanced iBAS system:
o within deadline
No
No No Yes (LM) Yes FD
o Consistent with GFS 2001 and COFOG No No No No No Yes FD
Com
pone
nt n
o. 3
6. Sustainable capacity building in Public Finance Management
• PFF becomes Center of Excellence in PFM related Trainings, research, publications and Capacity Building
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes
FD
• Post course evaluation provide evidence that skills and knowledge of the GoB in PFM increased substantially
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes
FD
Acronyms *FD - Finance Division ERD - Economic Relations Division BB – Bangladesh Bank LM - Line Ministry NSD - National Savings Directorate PFF - Public Finance Foundation
28
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
.
Component 1: Strategic Policy, Planning and Budget Management
Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al i
n FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
• Multi-sector Macro-economic/ Forecasting Model with user guide developed (Y/N)
No No - - Yes - - - - FD
• Multi-sector Macro-economic/ Forecasting Model used for MTMF (Y/N)
No No - Yes
Yes Yes FD
• DMFAS 6 installed, integrated and implemented in all related debt management entities (FABA, TDMW, and BB)
No No Yes - - - - - - ERD,BB & FD
• DMFAS 6 connected to the Government Financial Management Information System (GFMIS) (Y/N)
No No - - Yes - - - - ERD,BB, NSD & FD
• Debt Policy Strategy Paper completed (Y/N) No No Yes - - - - - - FD
• Cash plan showing monthly cash inflows and cash outflows and borrowing requirements prepared (Y/N)
No No - - - - Yes Yes FD
• Improved system for maintaining systematic record of government investment in shares and equities established (Y/N)
No No - - Yes - - - - FD
• Lending database updated and interfaced with iBAS (Y/N) No No - - - - Yes - - FD
B. Assessments of the project components (Output level)
29
ANNEX 1: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
.
Component 1: Strategic Policy, Planning and Budget Management
Indicator
Base
line
2009
-10
Actu
al
in F
Y
2010
-11
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Source
• Program Budget structure and guidelines with identification and costing of outputs developed (Y/N)
No No - - - - Yes - - FD
• No of LM piloted Program Budget
No No - - - - Yes - - FD
• Guidelines on poverty and gender
budgeting revised/enhanced (Y/N)
No No - - - - Yes - - FD
• No of ministries/divisions and other
institutions under MTBF
33 57 59 All All All
• No. of ministries/divisions and other
institutions prepared and submitted performance reporting
Nil Nil - - 2 3 5 FD
• No of LM prepared Medium Term
Strategic and Business Plans Nil Nil 1 4 5 - - FD,
LM
• No of LM & other institutions with dedicated budget wing/branch 36* 59 - - - - - - FD
• Internal Audit Manual developed and
published (Y/N) No No Yes - - - - - - FD
• Secondary legislation (rules and guidelines) under the Public Moneys and Financial management Act 2009 drafted and adopted (Y/N)
No No - - Yes - - - - FD
• GFR and Treasury Rules reviewed, revised and adopted (Y/N) No No - - Yes - - - - FD
* Not fully dedicated yet
30
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
.
Component 2: Public Financial Systems
Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al i
n FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
• Develop design and architecture of
the enhanced iBAS No No No Yes FD
• Technical specification of enhanced iBAS No No No
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Develop an interim system for
treasury and cash management as designed by component 1
No No No Yes FD
• Electronic fund transfers system for:
o Pay & Allowances No No No
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
o Pension & GPF
No No No
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
o Other Transfers No No No Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Develop a web-based module for incorporating monthly accounts of self-accounting entities within iBAS
No No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
FD
31
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
.
Component 2: Public Financial Systems
Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al in
FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
• Public Account Balances for all
CAOs, DCAs and DAOs recorded in iBAS
No No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Automated reconciliation of bank
balances between Bangladesh Bank and the Controller General of Account implemented
No No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Enhanced budget classification and
codes with a view to introducing program budgeting
No No No Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• Rolling out iBAS connectivity to
remaining LMs and field office levels
No 19* LM
Yes** ( all LM)
Yes (Partial)
Yes FD
• FSMU strengthened and
institutionalized
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes
FD
• Coverage of budget operationally No No No Yes
(Parti Yes FD
* Partial in 19 Line Ministries ** Centrally in all 59 Line Ministries
32
ANNEX 2: Results Framework and Monitoring
DEEPENING MTBF AND STRENGTHENING FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
.
Indicator
Base
line 2
009-
10
Actu
al i
n FY
20
10-1
1
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Source
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
• PFF is self-sustaining administratively and Functionally offering demand based learning strategies
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
• Training Management Information System developed to support a structured approach to training management, M & E
0% 0% 100% PFF , FD
• Conduct PFM and policy related research inaugurated through publication of PFF Journal
N N N Yes PFF ,
FD
• Comprehensive PFM related Training Need Assessed
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
• Consolidated Training plans developed
No Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
• Modularised curriculum developed and delivered for important technical areas of PFM
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
• All courses maintain approved PFF standards for effective pedagogy
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
• Framework for M&E developed and Implemented
No No Yes (Partial)
Yes PFF , FD
Component 3: Training and Capacity Building in PFM
The World Bank Office, DhakaPlot E-32, Agargaon, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar
Dhaka, Bangladesh.Website: www.spemp.com
Email: [email protected]: 8159001-14
Fax: 8159029-30