69
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program Agricultural Assessment Component
| Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | mabel-mcgee |
| View: | 212 times |
| Download: | 0 times |
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Assessment
Component
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.2
Agricultural component
Optional assessment Disable the assessment entirely Disable sections of the assessment Recommended that States complete the
assessmentDeveloped in coordination with the USDAJurisdictions with substantial agricultural:
Industry Resources Activities Enterprises
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 87
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Vulnerability
Assessment
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.4
Hom
ela
nd
Secu
rity
Str
ate
gic
P
lan
nin
g
Risk AssessmentNeeds
Assessment
Shortfalls or “Gaps”Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment
Desired Capabilities
Current CapabilitiesVulnerability
AssessmentThreat
Assessment
State Administrative Agency
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.5
Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment Process
Assessment completion off-lineInclude specialized personnel in the
Agricultural Vulnerability Working GroupSelect potential targetsConduct individual assessmentsDetermine agricultural vulnerabilityOn-line entry of agricultural vulnerability
ratingAssessment is primarily pre-harvest
Post harvest covered under basic assessment
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 88
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.6
Agricultural Vulnerability Working Group Multi-discipline members Include personnel who can provide
specific information unique to agricultural targets
Ranchers/Farmers Veterinarians Feed lot owner/operators
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.7
Potential Agricultural Targets
Facilities, sites, systems, special events Feed lot/feed mill owners/managers Livestock representatives Agro-chemical manufacturing
owners/managers Ranch/Farm owners/managers Veterinarians
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.8
7 Factors Used to Assess Agricultural Vulnerability
Level of visibilityCriticality of target site to jurisdictionImpact upon industryPTE access to potential targetPotential target threat of hazardCapacity of the facilityProduct distribution area A
gri
cu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 90
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.9
Capacity of Facility
Maximum number of animals or amount of crops (plant products or seed) at a site at any given time
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
Capacity of Facility
Number of Animals Value Bushels of Crops Value
1 – 250 0 1 -2500 0
251 – 500 1 2501 – 5000 1
501 - 1000 2 5001 – 10,000 2
1001 – 5000 3 10,001 – 50,000 3
5001 – 10,000 4 50,001 – 250,000 4
10,000 + 5 250,000 + 5
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.10
Product Distribution Area
The extent of dissemination of products from this facility. How far are products from this facility shipped?
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
Product Distribution Area
Rating Value
Locally
0
Countywide
1
Territorywide
2
Regionally
3
Nationally
4
Internationally
5
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.11
Summary total
Rating key
Enter target rating
The same process used in the basic Vulnerability Assessment
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.12
Final Agricultural Vulnerability Rating
Highest Agricultural Vulnerability Rating of all site/targets
Include raw score
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.13
Site-Specific Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment
The same process used as the basic Site-Specific Vulnerability Assessment
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 93
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramDevelop Agricultural
Planning Factors
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
Agricultural Bioterrorism Potential
Scenarios
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.16
Selected Threat Primary Targeted Human HealthCommodities Threat
Foot & Mouth Beef & Dairy Cattle NoDisease Sheep & Goats
Swine, Deer (hunting)
Bovine Spongiform Beef & Dairy cattle YesEncephalopathy(Mad Cow)
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.17
Selected Threat Primary Targeted Human HealthCommodities Threat
African Swine Swine NoFever
Hog Cholera Swine No
Avian Influenza Poultry Yes
Enzootic Newcastle Poultry NoDisease
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.18
Estimated cost of an outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in the USA
$ 10 to 30 billion
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.19
Effects of Introducing Foot and Mouth Disease in the USA
Even if FMD appears in a State with a relatively small livestock industry, the negative effects will impact the whole country
As a result of the introduction of FMD or another exotic animal disease in the US all export permits are immediately revoked
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.20
Foot and Mouth Disease“Domino Effect” on Agricultural Production Chain
Animal Feed
RestaurantsProcessing Plants &Retail Business
Farm Equipment
Transportation
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.21
Foot and Mouth Disease Different Scenarios
Auctions and sales barnsPotential for rapid spread throughout
the country and export marketsLarge animal production units
Feedlots – 50,000 to 500,000 cattleSwine operations – 1,000 to 7,000 hogsDairies – 3,000 to 12,000 milking cowsPoultry – 1,000,000 bird
Range animals and wildlifeDelayed recognition
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.22
Foot and Mouth Disease Immediate ResponseQuarantine
Protection Zone3 miles or more
around affected premises
Depopulation of affected and exposed animals
Restricted Area1 mile or more around
the protection zoneMonitoring
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.23
Foot and Mouth Disease Collateral Problems
Massive Preemptive DepopulationHumane SlaughterSpecial equipmentTrained personnel
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.24
Foot and Mouth Disease Collateral Problems
Carcass disposalRendering or Waste-energy PlantsOn-site Pyre BurningOn-site burial
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.25
Foot and Mouth Disease Collateral Problems
Environmental ImpactSurface and ground water
contamination
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.26
Foot and Mouth Disease Collateral Problems
Opposition from Farmers
Opposition from Animal Rights Groups
Opposition from Environmentalist
Groups
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.27
Hom
ela
nd
Secu
rity
Str
ate
gic
P
lan
nin
g
Risk AssessmentNeeds
Assessment
Shortfalls or “Gaps”Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment
Desired Capabilities
Current CapabilitiesVulnerability
AssessmentThreat
Assessment
State Administrative Agency
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.28
Agricultural Planning Factors
Links Agricultural Vulnerability Assessments to jurisdiction agricultural capabilities and needs
Designed to help Jurisdiction Working Groups develop potential response scenarios for agricultural incidents
Jurisdiction working group may choose to develop alternative methods
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral P
lan
nin
g F
acto
rsR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 94
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.29
Agricultural planning factors process
Assessment completion off-lineList Potential Targets
Animals Plants and crops
Likelihood of biological incident on TargetProject affected animals and/or plantsDetermine Maximum Score for eachDetermine Potential Scenarios
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral P
lan
nin
g F
acto
rs
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.30
Animals
Determine Maximum ScoreSame process as basic Planning Factors
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral P
lan
nin
g F
acto
rs
Planning Factors
Biological Agricultural Impact
Site/TargetPotential
()Dead
AnimalsSymptomatic
Exposed No
Symptoms
Possibly Exposed
1
2 10 50 250 500
3
4 50 100 200 500
Max Value Total 50 100 250 500
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 95
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.31
Plants/Crops
Determine Maximum Score
Same process as basic Planning Factors
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral P
lan
nin
g F
acto
rsR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 97
Planning Factors
Biological Agricultural Impact
Site/TargetPotential
()Contaminated
Possibly Contaminated
1
2 1000 2000
3
4 9,000 50,000
Max Value Total 9,000 50,000
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramConduct Agricultural
Capabilities Assessment
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.33
Hom
ela
nd
Secu
rity
Str
ate
gic
P
lan
nin
g
Risk AssessmentNeeds
Assessment
Shortfalls or “Gaps”Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment
Desired Capabilities
Current CapabilitiesVulnerability
AssessmentThreat
Assessment
State Administrative Agency
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.34
Agricultural Capabilities Assessment
State and local task Uses the Agricultural Planning Factors
and biological scenarios to help determine desired and current capabilities needed by the jurisdiction to respond effectively
Assessment outputs:1. WMD Response Levels for Responders
2. Tasks for Response
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral V
uln
era
bilit
y
Assessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbook
page 99
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.35
Agricultural Response Levels for Responders
Document desired and current capability for response to a biological incident Number of emergency responders needed to
respond to the incident Number of emergency responders desired at
each agricultural response level Number of emergency responders currently
equipped and trained at each agricultural response level
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Assessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
ReferenceHandbookpage B-35
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.36
Number of Responders Equipped and Trained at Level
Determine personnel who are currently equipped and trained at desired level
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Assessm
en
t
Jurisdiction Response
Total # of Responders Total #
of Respond
ers Desired
at Response Level
Total # Currently Equipped
& Trained
at Desired Level
Percent Ready
at Desired Level
100
WMD Response Level - 0
WMD Response Level - 1 100 40 40%
WMD Response Level - 2 25 10 40%
WMD Response Level - 3 10 5 50%
WMD Response Level - 4 10 0 0%
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.37
Agricultural Tasks for Response
Determine specific tasks for response by the jurisdiction
Assess ability to perform tasksJurisdiction task capability is determined
by: Plans Organizations Equipped Trained Exercised
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.38
Evaluate Tasks for Response
Determine jurisdiction capability to conduct each task
Same criteria used for yes, no, partial, N/A responses as basic task by discipline
Add a specialized agricultural task
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Assessm
en
t
Task: Conduct Preliminary Diagnosis for agricultural WMD agents
Jurisdiction Response Biological
Plans
Organization
Equipment
Training
Exercises
R E F E R E N C E :
ReferenceHandbookpage C-14
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.39
Agricultural Response Capability Needs – Report
Same process used as the basic Response Capability Needs - Report
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
Assessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.41
Hom
ela
nd
Secu
rity
Str
ate
gic
P
lan
nin
g
Risk AssessmentNeeds
Assessment
Shortfalls or “Gaps”Agricultural Vulnerability Assessment
Desired Capabilities
Current CapabilitiesVulnerability
AssessmentThreat
Assessment
State Administrative Agency
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.42
Agricultural Needs Assessment
Five solutions areas Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises
Agricultural Technical Assistance report for each solution area
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment Planning
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.44
Agricultural Planning solution area addresses the following:
Does the jurisdiction have an Agriculture Incident Annex (AIA)? If so, when was the annex last updated?
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 107
Current Agricultural Incident Annex Yes No
When was the AIA last updated?
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.45
AIA annexSame process used as the basic annex
survey
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Does your Plan address any of the following issues:
Continuity of Operations Yes No
Continuity of Government Yes No
Mass Decontamination Yes No
Isolation Yes No
Quarantine Yes No
Recovery and Restoration Yes No
Volunteers Yes No
Donated Resources Yes No
Resource Management Yes No
Mass Casualties Yes No
Evacuation Yes No
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.46
Agricultural Emergency Response Capabilities
Same process used as the basic Emergency Response Capabilities
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
TypeJurisdictio
n Capability
# Full Time Personn
el
# Voluntee
r Personn
el
Receives Mutual Aid
Provides Mutual Aid
Law Enforcement (LE)
Yes 300 20
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
Yes 50 5
Emergency Management (EMA)
Yes 10 0
Fire Service (FS)
Yes 100 20
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.47
Mutual Aid
Same process used as the basic Mutual Aid assessment
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
TypeJurisdictio
n Capability
# Full Time
Personnel
# Volunteer Personnel
Receives Mutual Aid
Provides Mutual Aid
Law Enforcement (LE)
Yes 300 20 Yes Yes
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
Yes 50 5 Yes Yes
Emergency Management (EMA)
Yes 10 0 No No
Fire Service (FS) Yes 100 20 Yes Yes
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.48
Select TA
Select the TA desired from the menuDescribe any other TA desired if not listed
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Type of Technical Assistance
Develop/Update Emergency Operations Plan
Develop/Update Response Protocols
Develop/Update Agricultural Terrorism Incident Annex Template
Design/develop interoperable communications strategy
Facilitation of Working Group
Other Technical Assistance Description
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 110
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment Organization
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.50
Agricultural Organization solution area addresses the following areas:
Agricultural Team capability Receives/Provides mutual aid Number of Agricultural teams Number of personnel per team “Other” emergency response teamsN
eed
s A
ssessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 111
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.51
Step 1 - Type of Team
Use the definitions of each agricultural emergency response team provided
Indicate team capabilityList “other” agricultural teams
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
TypeJurisdiction Capability
Receives Mutual
Aid
Provides Mutual
Aid
Number of Teams
Number of Personnel per Team
HazMat Yes
Decontamination Yes
Metropolitan Medical Response Team
Yes
Public Health Team No
Agricultural Emergency Response Team
No
Agricultural Assessment and Sampling Team
No
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.52
Step 2 - Receives/Provides Mutual Aid
Indicate if the jurisdiction receives/provides mutual aid Written agreement required
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
TypeJurisdiction Capability
Receives Mutual
Aid
Provides Mutual
Aid
Number of Teams
Number of Personnel per Team
HazMat Yes Yes Yes
Decontamination Yes No No
Metropolitan Medical Response Team
Yes Yes Yes
Public Health Team No Yes No
Agricultural Emergency Response Team
No Yes No
Agricultural Assessment and Sampling Team
No Yes No
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.53
Step 3 - Teams & Team Members
Number of Teams/Personnel on each teamSame process used as the basic
Emergency Response Teams assessment
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
TypeJurisdiction Capability
Receives Mutual
Aid
Provides Mutual
Aid
Number of Teams
Number of Personnel per Team
HazMat Yes Yes Yes 1 5
Decontamination Yes No No 1 5
Metropolitan Medical Response Team
Yes Yes Yes 2 7
Public Health Team No Yes No 0 0
Agricultural Emergency Response Team
No Yes No 0 0
Agricultural Assessment and Sampling Team
No Yes No 0 0
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.54
Select TA
Select the TA desired from the menuDescribe any other TA desired if not listed
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Type of Technical Assistance
Identify Additional Agricultural Response Team Requirements
Identify Agricultural Response Team Equipment
Identify Additional Response Team Staffing Needs
Develop Regional Agricultural Response Team Protocols
Other Technical Assistance Description
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 113
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment Equipment
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.56
Agricultural Equipment solution area addresses the following areas:
Selection of Standardized Equipment List (SEL) categories
Selection of SEL typesDesignation of “other” equipment needsDesignation of disciplines that require
equipmentAnalysis of equipment shortfalls (or gaps)Same process used as the basic
Equipment assessmentAg
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 115
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.57
Select TA
Select the TA desired from the menuDescribe any other TA desired if not listed
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Type of Technical Assistance
Maintenance and Calibration of Specific Equipment
Use of Chemical Protective Clothing
Use of Equipment
Establish Standardized Equipment Lists
Identifying Interoperability Needs
Other Technical Assistance Description
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 119
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment Training
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.59
Agricultural Training solution area addresses the following areas:
Personnel who should be trainedPersonnel who are currently trainedPersonnel who are not trained
Training levels:
AwarenessPerformance
Defensive Offensive
Planning/ManagementSame process used as the basic Training
AssessmentAg
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 125
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.60
Select TA
Select the TA desired from the menuDescribe any other TA desired if not listed
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Type of Technical Assistance
Determining Training Needs
Identifying Training Resources
Evaluate Locally Developed WMD Courses
Other Technical Assistance Description
R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 131
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs
Assessment Exercises
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.62
Agricultural Exercise solution area addresses the following areas:
Required exercises are limited to biological
Planned may be unique based on jurisdiction capabilities Record the hazard to be simulated during the
exercise
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 132
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.63
Select TA
Select the TA desired from the menuDescribe any other TA desired if not listed
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
Type of Technical Assistance
Exercise Planning
Exercise Program Design and Development
Exercise Evaluation
Other Technical Assistance Description
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramAgricultural Needs Assessment
Technical Assistance
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.65
Needs Assessment – TA
Collected at the end of each Solution Area (5) Planning Organization Equipment Training Exercises
Information Provided Type of TA requested Frequency of delivery Participating jurisdictions
Same process used as the basic Training assessmentA
gri
cu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
tR E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 142
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy ProgramSubmit Agricultural Assessments
and Recommendations
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.67
Agricultural Recommendations
to State and ODP
Agricultural component is an important part of preparedness effort for the state
Recommendations should be made that will improve the assessment process
Supports those jurisdictions within the state that have substantial agricultural industry resources, activities, and/or enterprises
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t R E F E R E N C E :
JurisdictionHandbookpage 145
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.68
Agricultural Assessments completed
No submit action required to SAAComponent of basic assessmentCompletion report within the basic
assessment will designate those portions of the agricultural component that remain incomplete
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program
9.69
DISCUSSION
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral N
eed
s A
ssessm
en
t
![Component 1: Natural Hazard Risk Assessment Report [Year]documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/466781468299341781/... · 2016-07-22 · Component 1: Natural Hazard Risk Assessment Public](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/5edc567bad6a402d6666f60d/component-1-natural-hazard-risk-assessment-report-year-2016-07-22-component.jpg)
