STATEMENT OF BASIS
For the issuance of Draft Air Permit # 0224-AOP-RI5 AFIN: 15-00001
1. PERMITTING AUTHORITY:
Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality5301 Northshore DriveNorth Little Rock, Arkansas 72118-5317
2. APPLICANT:
Green Bay Packaging Inc. (Arkansas Kraft Division)338 Highway 113Morrilton, Arkansas 72110
3. PERMIT WRITER:
Kimberly O'Guinn
4. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND NAICS CODE:
NAICS Description: Paperboard MillsNAICS Code: 322130
5. SUBMITTALS:
12/3/2012
6. REVIEWER'S NOTES:
Green Bay Packaging, Inc.-Arkansas Kraft Division (AKD) of 338 Highway 113,Morrilton, Conway County, Arkansas 72110 has owned and operated a fully integratedkraft pulp and paper mill in Oppelo, near Morrilton, since 1965. This modification is torevise Specific Conditions #149 & 158 to remove language referencing the exclusion ofSSM for SN-37, LVHC Collection System, and SN-38, HVLC Collection System, under40 CFR 63 Subpart S due to recent final rule changes by EPA. Also this modification isto allow the addition of three emergency RICE engines to the permit under 40 CFR Part60 Subpart ZZZZ (SN-41, SN-42, and SN-43).
Lastly the modification is to replace the headbox on the #2 Paper Machine (SN-25B).Since replacing the headbox is not a routine maintenance activity, evaluation of theemissions from the source for PSD applicability is required. The facility submitted aPSD evaluation which demonstrated replacing the headbox is less than the PSDsignificance level for VOC. Therefore, PSD permitting is not required at this time.
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 2 of 16
Permitted emissions rates will increase as follows: 0.4 tons/year (tpy) PM/PM IO, 1.6 tpyS02, 0.4 tpy VOC, 0.9 tpy CO, 3.5 tpy NOx and 0.048 tpy of total HAPs.
7. COMPLIANCE STATUS:
The following summarizes the current compliance of the facility including active/pendingenforcement actions and recent compliance activities and issues.
There are no current compliance issues.
8. PSD APPLICABILITY:
a. Did the facility undergo PSD review in this permit (i.e., BACT, Modeling, etc.)? N
b. Is the facility categorized as a major source for PSD? YSingle pollutant 2: 100 tpy and on the list 0/28 or single pollutant 2: 250 tpy and not on list?
If yes, explain why this permit modification not PSD?
The facility submitted a PSD evaluation which demonstrated replacing the headbox isless than the PSD significance level for VOC. Therefore, PSD permitting is not requiredat this time.
9. GHG MAJOR SOURCE (TITLE V):
Indicate one:IZI Facility is classified as a major source for GHG and the permit includes this
designationo Facility does not have the physical potential to be a major GHG sourceo Facility has restrictions on GHG or throughput rates that limit facility to a minor
GHG source. Describe these restrictions: --------------
10. SOURCE AND POLLUTANT SPECIFIC REGULATORY APPLICABILITY:
Source PollutantRegulation
(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)
SN-04 and SN-15 NSPS Db
SN-23 NSPS BB
Facility NESHAPM
Facility MACTS
Facility MACTMM
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 3 of 16
Source Pollutant Regulation(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)
SN-39 MACTRR
SN-04, SN-05A, SN-07,PM CAM
SN-08, SN-09
SN-41, SN-42, SN-43 NESHAP ZZZZ
11. EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULATION:
See emission change and fee calculation spreadsheet in Appendix A.
12. MODELING:
Criteria Pollutants
Emission RateNAAQS Highest
%ofPollutant Standard Averaging Time Concentration(lblhr)
(ug/rrr') (ug/nr')NAAQS
50 Annual 20.42* 40.84%PMlO 312.8
150 24-Hour 94.36* 62.91%
80 Annual 2.59 3.24%
S02 125.6 1300 3-Hour 66.89 5.15%
365 24-Hour 23.85 6.53%
10,000 8-Hour 524.65 5.25%CO 1338.2
40,000 I-Hour 2458.18 6.15%
NO x 297.9 100 Annual 5.49 5.49%* Concentration include background values. Refined Modeling was performed by thefacility.
Non-Criteria Pollutants:
1st Tier Screening (PAER)
Estimated hourly emissions from the following sources were compared to thePresumptively Acceptable Emission Rate (PAER) for each compound. The Departmenthas deemed the PAER to be the product, in lb/hr, of 0.1 1 and the Threshold Limit Value(mg/nr'), as listed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists(ACGIH).
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 4 of 16
PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =
Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/rrr') 0.11 x TLV
Acetaldehyde 45.04 4.9544 12.35 NO
Acrolein 0.23 0.0253 2.79 NO
Benzene 1.60 0.176 2.69 NO
Biphenyl 1.26 0.13 0.11 Yes
Formaldehyde 15.00 1.65 3.16 NO
Hexane 1,762.3 193.86 0.36 Yes
Hydrogen Chloride 2.98 0.3278 14.65 NO
Manganese 0.20 0.022 0.98 NO
Methanol 262.09 28.8299 84.6 NO
Methane 656.15 72.17 159.73 NO
Methyl IsobutylKetone 204.83 22.5313 0.19 Yes
Methylene Chloride 173.68 19.11 0.03 Yes
Napthalene 52.43 5.7673 0.23 Yes
Pentane 1,770.55 194.76 0.52 Yes
Phenol 19.24 2.11 0.16 Yes
Propoinaldehyde 47.53 5.2283 0.03 Yes
Styrene 85.21 9.3731 1.28 Yes
Sulfuric Acid 1.00 0.11 1.08 NO
Tetrachloroethylene 169.53 18.65 0.03 Yes
Toluene 188.41 20.7251 0.77 Yes
1,2,4 Trichloro-benzene 37.11 4.0821 0.04 Yes
Trichloroethylene 268.72 29.5592 0.28 Yes
m, p Xylene 434.19 47.7609 0.13 Yes
o Xylene 434.19 47.7609 0.11 Yes
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 5 of 16
PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =
Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/rrr') 0.11 x TLV
Acetone 1187.12 130.5832 3.44 Yes
Ammonia 17.42 1.9162 11.34 NO
2nd Tier Screening (PAIL)
AERMOD air dispersion modeling was performed on the estimated hourly emissionsfrom the following sources, in order to predict ambient concentrations beyond theproperty boundary. The Presumptively Acceptable Impact Level (PAIL) for eachcompound has been deemed by the Department to be one one-hundredth of the ThresholdLimit Value as listed by the ACGIH.
PollutantPAIL (ug/nr') = 1/100 of Modeled Concentration
Pass?Threshold Limit Value (ug/nr')
Acetaldehyde 450.04 121.40 Y
Acrolein 2.29 1.71 Y
Benzene 1.60 0.53 Y
Formaldehyde 15.00 0.61 Y
Hydrogen Chloride 29.8 2.43 Y
Manganese 2.0 0.20 Y
Methanol 2620.9 1091.17 Y
Methane 6561.5 2085.6 Y
Sulfuric Acid 10.0 0.08 Y
Ammonia 174.2 81.74 Y
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 6 of 16
13. CALCULATIONS:
EmissionFactor
Emission Factor ControlControl
SN Source(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) Equipment
Equipment Comments(AP-42, Efficiency
testing, etc.)
PM IO 1.9lxlO-3 #/# steam
PM: 3.72xlO-3 #/# steamTesting and
VOC: 3.3xlO-5 #/# steamthroughput
CO: 2.9xlO-3 #/# steam02 MulticlonesNOx: 6.6xlO- 5 #/# steam
AP-42 S02:0.025 lb/MMBtu
PM IO 1.38xlO-4 #/# steam
PM: 1.38xlO-4 #/# steam
Testing and VOC: 1.15xlO-5 #/# steamthroughput CO: 2.0x10-4 #/# steam Multiclones
04 NOx: 3.l3xlO-4 #/# steam Wet
S02: 5.6xlO-6#/# steamScrubber
AP-42NOx: 0.3 lb/MMBtu
NSPS
PM: 0.17 lb/ton BLS
PM IO: 0.43 lb/ton BLS
S02: 0.72 lb/ton BLS05A Testing VOC: 0.09 lb/ton BLS ESP 99.8%
CO: 3.08 lb/ton BLS
NOx: 1.28 lb/ton BLSLead: l.2x10-5 lb/ton BLS
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 7 of 16
Emission
ControlFactorEmission Factor Control
Equipment CommentsSN Source(lb/ton, 1b/hr, etc.) Equipment
Efficiency(AP-42,I testing, etc.)
NCASI in PM: 0.15 lb/ton BLSTechnical
PMlO: 0.1631b/tonBLSBulleting
S02: 0.005 lb/ton BLS884, AugustVenturi2004 Table VOC: 0.010 lb/ton BLS
Scrubber074.15 & CO: 0.008 lb/ton BLS
Technical NO x: 0.020 lb/ton BLSBulletin Lead: 3.4xlO-6Ib/ton BLS
858, Table TRS: 3.36xlO-2Ib/ton BLS17A
CO: 0.1 lblADTPS02: 0.064 Ibs/tonCaO
08Testing, AP- NOx: 0.70 lbs/ton CaO Wet Scrub42, NCASI VOC: 0.023 lbs/tons CaO
HVLCTesting and
Collection11throughput
System
NCASI None12
PM/PMlO:7.6 lb/l 06ft3 gas
VOC:5.5 Ib/l06ft3 gas
AP-42 CO:84Ib/l06ft3 gas FOR15
NOx: 100 lb/l 06ft3 gas
S02:0.6Ib/l06ft3 gas
16Testing andthroughput
Acetone: 2.3x10-2 1b/TTO
Methanol: 9.3xlO-2Ib/TTONone17 NCASI
Phenol: 1.9xlO-2 Ib/TTO
TRS: 3.3xlO-2Ib/TTO
10.921b S02/MMBtu None22 Testing
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001
8 f 16Page 0
Emission
ControlControlFactor
Emission FactorEquipment CommentsSN Source
(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) EquipmentEfficiency(AP-42,
testing, etc.)
YQC: 1.2 lb/ton chips
TRS: 0.002 lb/ton chipsNone23 NCASI
4 h'Acetaldehyde: 2.7x10- lb/ton c IpS
Methanol q.Sxl Of Ib/ton/chip
None24 AP-42
YOC: 0.09 lb/ton finished paper55% of(recovered/purchased pulp)
None 310,333 tons25A NCASIYOC: 1.13 1b/ton finished paper (100% virgin
pulppulp)
45% ofYOC: 0.09lb/ton finished paper310,333 tons(recovered/purchased pulp)
None pulp25B NCASIYOC: 1.13 lb/ton finished paper (100% virgin
pulp)
PM/PMIO:7.6xl0-6lb/ft3
AP-42 S02:6.0xlO-7
Section 1.4NOx:1.0xl0-4 None26
Tables 1.4-1CO: 8.4xl0-5
and 1.4-2YOC: 5.5xl0-6
PM/PMIO:7.6xl0-6lb/ft3
AP-42 S02: 6.Oxl0-7
Section 1.4NOx: LOx10-4 None27
Tables 1.4-1CO: 8.4xl0-5
and 1.4-2YOC: 5.5xl0-6
AP-42Section 2.4
None30&
LandGEM
Total HAPs: 0.72 lb/hrNCASI TB
Acetone 0.016lb/hrNone31 No. 677 &
YOC: 0.72 lb/hrTesting TRS: 0.11 lb/hr
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 9 of 16
EmissionFactor
Emission Factor ControlSN Source Control
Equipment Comments(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) Equipment(AP-42, Efficiencytesting, etc.)
NCASI TB Total HAPs: 0.14 lb/TCaO
32No. 676 & Acetone 0.015 lb/TCaO
858 VOC: 0.14lb/TCaO None
& Testing TRS: 0.44lb/hr/tank
Slacker: lb/ton Cao Causticizer: lb/ton CaoAmmonia: 0.28 Ammonia: 0.16
36NCASI TB Acetone: 1.9x10"2 Acetone: 2.1x10-4 None
No. 676 Acetaldehyde:5.3x10"2 Acetaldehyde: 1.0x10"3Methanol:5.3x10-2 Methanol: 5.5xlO"4
37NCASITB Methanol: 0.29 lb/ADTP #2 Lime Kiln
No. 858 TRS: 0.11lb/ADTP NCG Flare
38NCASI TB TRS: 0.42x10-2 lb/ADTP #2 Lime Kiln
No. 858 Methanol: 4.3xlO-2 NCG Flare
UnpavedPMIQ: l.11lbNMT (Daily Max)
PMIQ: 0.79lb/VMT (Annual)
AP-42PM: 4.80 lb/VMT (Daily Max)
40 Chap. 13.2.1PM: 3.42 lbNMT (Annual)
Paved& 13.2.2 PMIQ: 0.89 lbNMT (Daily Max)
PMIQ: 0.82 lbNMT (Annual)PM: 4.56 lb/VMT (Daily Max)
PM: 4.23 lb/VMT (Annual)lb/hp-hr
NOx: 0.0314142 AP-42 CO: 0.00668 None
43 Table 3.3-1 Sox: 0.00205PMIQ: 0.0022
TOC-Exhaust: 0.00247
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 10 of 16
14. TESTING REQUIREMENTS:
The permit requires testing of the following sources.
SN Pollutants Test Method Test Interval Justification
PM IO 202 or 5
02VOC 25A
Every 5 yearsPrevious permit
CO 10 requirementsNO x 7E
PM IO 202 or 5
04VOC 25A
Every 5 yearsPrevious permit
S02 6C requirementsCO 10
PM IO 201 or 201AVOC 25A
Previous permit05A S02 6C Every 5 years
requirementsCO 10NO x 7E
07PM
202 or 5 Every 5 yearsPrevious permit
PM IO requirements
15 S02 6C AnnualPrevious permit
requirements
39 HAP cone.Collection Initial 40 CFR 63,
305 Annual Subpart S
15. MONITORING OR CEMS
The permittee must monitor the following parameters with CEMS or other monitoringequipment (temperature, pressure differential, etc.)
SNParameter or Pollutant Method
FrequencyReport
to be Monitored (CEM, Pressure Gauge, etc.) (YIN)
04Liquid flow to the
Strip Chart Hourly orNscrubber continuously
04Pressure drop across
Strip chart Hourly orNscrubber continuously
05ATRS TRS Monitor (Perf. Spec. #5)
Continuously NO2 O2 Monitor (Perf. Spec. #3)
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 11 of 16
SNParameter or Pollutant Method
FrequencyReport
to be Monitored (CEM, Pressure Gauge, etc.) (YIN)
05A Opacity CEM Continuously N
07 Pressure drop and Flow CPMS Continuously N
08 TRS emission rate22 O2
H2S on dry basis 12 hour average N
08 Pressure drop acrossStrip Chart
Hourly orscrubber continuously
N
08 Liquid flow to theStrip Chart
Hourly orN
scrubber continuously
15 NOx CEM Continuously N
Temperature of gases Temperature CEM accurate23 from batch digesters to be within 1% of the temperature Continuously N
incinerated being measured
37Negative pressure Anemometer, smoke tubes
38 Annual N39
Leak detection Part 60, Method 21
Condensate flow Flow meter or mass balance39 Pulp flow Continuous N
Pulp consistency Consistency meter
16. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS:
The following are items (such as throughput, fuel usage, VOC content, etc.) that must betracked and recorded.
SN Recorded Item Permit Limit Frequency Report (YIN)
Steam throughput100,000 lb/hr Monthly Y
225,000,000 lb/12 months
02 Opacity 40%
Hours used asbackup incineration 1000 hours/12 month period Hourly N
of HAPs
04 Steam throughput270,000 lb/hr Monthly Y
2,100,000,000 lb/12 months
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 12 of 16
SN Recorded Item Permit Limit Frequency Report (YIN)
Furniture manufacturingwaste: 3% of total fuel
Fuel combusted consumption Monthly Yeach day Scrap non-halogenated
plastics: 15% by weight of theannual total fuel
Opacity 20%
Stearn generation394,000 lb/hr
Black liquor438,000 tons/12 months
Monthly Ythroughput
05A Fuel TypeBlack liquor solids
Monthly YNatural gas
Black liquor438,000 tons/12 months Monthly Y
throughput
07Black liquor
438,000 tons/12 months Monthly Ythroughput
08 Lime throughput 84,950 tons/12 months Monthly Y
11Date C02 added to - As Used N
shower water
12Pulp throughput
310,333 tons/12 months Monthly Y(Air dried)
199,000 lb/hr DailyStearn generation 1,700,000,000 1b/12 months Monthly Y
15Amount of each fuel
combusted - Daily N
17Production or
15,012 tons/12 months Monthly Yprocess of soap
Hours of operation 1000 hours/12 months Daily Y22 Minimum
Temperature1200°F Daily Y
Production rate of301,750 air dried tons/year
25Afinished paper 170,683 bone dried kraft pulp Monthly Y
tons/year
25BProduction rate of 248,500 air dried tons/year
Monthlyfinished paper 139,650 kraft pulp tons/yearY
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 13 of 16
SN Recorded Item Permit Limit Frequency Report (YIN)
30 Annual waste489,000 yd3/hr Monthlyacceptance rate Y
31 Pulp throughput (air310,333 tons/12 months Monthly32 dried) Y
36 Lime throughput 84,950 tons/12 months Monthly Y
Excess emission Emissions in excess ofSemi-annual Yreleases NESHAP limit of 1%
37 MaintenanceAs Used NActivities -
Inspection of LVHC - As Used N
Excess emission Emissions in excess ofSemi-annual Yreleases NESHAP limit of 4%
38 MaintenanceAs Used NActivities -
Inspection of HVLC - As Used N
39Mass, flow and
General recording Monthly Yconsistency of pulp
5, 7, andMonthly N8 PM Established
Malfunction AsN-
Applicable
41,42, Hours of operation 500 hours per calendar year Monthly Y43 Maintenance Check: 100
Hours of operation hours/year As Needed NNon-emergency: 50 hours/yr
17. OPACITY:
SN Opacity Justification for limit Compliance Mechanism
02 40 Previous permit limit Daily
04 20 (NSPS) Flow Rate & Pressure Differential
05A 20 Previous permit limit Daily
07 20 Previous permit limit Daily
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 14 of 16
SN Opacity Justification for limit Compliance Mechanism
08 20Previous permit limit N/A
22 20
15 20 Previous permit limit Daily
26,27 5 Previous permit limit Burning natural gas
41,42,43 20 19.503 Annually
18. DELETED CONDITIONS:
Former SC I Justification for removal
N/A
19. GROUP A INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
Group AEmissions (tpy)
Source NameCategory PM/PM HAPs
S02 VOC CO NOx10 Single Total
Pocket Vent System1
Heater #1 (SN-28)Pocket Vent System
1Heater #2 (SN-29)
Defoamer Tank3(Pulp Mill)
Used Oil Tank 3 0.0001
North Diesel Storage3 0.0008Tank
South Diesel Storage3 0.0006Tank
Diesel Oil Storage3 0.0004Tank
50% Caustic Storage4
Tanks Recovery Area50% Caustic Storage
4Tanks Tall Oil Area50% Caustic Storage
Tanks Secondary 4Recovery Area
Permit #: 0224-AOP-R15AFIN: 15-00001Page 15 of 16
Group A Emissions (tpy)Source Name
Category PM/PM HAPsS02 VOC CO NO x
10 Single TotalEmissions From
5Laboratory VentsSulfuric Acid Tanks
13(4)Small Fuel Oil Tanks
13 0.01(SN-33)
Large Fuel Oil Tank 13 0.20
Intermediate BlackLiquor Storage Tanks 13 0.70
(2)Heavy Black Liquor
13 0.88Storage Tanks (3)White Liquor Storage
13 0.91Tanks (4)High Density Pulp
13 0.31Storage Tanks (2)
Cooling Towers 13
Salt Cake Storage Tank 13
Muriatic Acid Tote Bin 13
Tall Oil Brine Storage13
Tanks (3)Calcium Carbonate
13Storage
Alum Storage 13
Starch Cooker 13
Sludge Press Area -13
Vent Exhaust
Ferric Sulfate Storage 13
N-Sol 32 Storage 13
Secondary Fiber Plant 13 1.06
#1 Lime Silos (Sodium13 0.20
Carbonate) (SN-18)#2 Lime Silos (Sodium
13 0.20Carbonate) (SN-19)
Starch Silo (SN-20) 13 0.60
Permit #: 0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001Page 16 of 16
Group AEmissions (tpy)
Source NameCategory PM/PM HAPs
S02 VOC CO NOx Single Total10
Lime Silo - Water13 0.20
Plant (SN-2I)Turpentine Storage
13Tank (SN-34)
Turpentine Loading13 0.52
Operation (SN-35) e
Gasoline Storage Tank 13 0.28
20. VOIDED, SUPERSEDED, OR SUBSUMED PERMITS:
List all active permits voided/superseded/subsumed by the issuance of this permit.
Permit #
0224-AOP-RI4
21. CONCURRENCE BY:
The following supervisor concurs with the permitting decision.
Karen Cerney, P.E.
APPENDIX A - EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULAnON
Fee Calculation for Major Source
Revised 08-20-12
Facility Name: Green Bay Packaging Incorporated,Arkansas Kraft DivisionPermit Number:0224-AOP-RI5AFIN: 15-00001
$/ton factorPermit Type
Minor Modification Fee $Minimum Modification Fee $Renewal with Minor Modification $
Check if Facility Holds an Active Minor Source or MinorSource General PermitIf Hold Active Permit, Amt of Last Annual Air Permit Invoice $
Total Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)Initial Title V Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)
22.97Minor Mod
5001000500
o4.7
Annual Chargeable Emissions (tpy)
Permit Fee $3754.59
500
HAPs not included in VOC or PM:
Air Contaminants:
Chlorine, Hydrazine, HCI, HF, Methyl Chloroform, Methylene Chloride,Phosphine, Tetrachloroethylene, Titanium Tetrachloride
All air contaminants are chargeable unless they are included in othertotals (e.g., H2S04 in condensible PM, H2S in TRS, etc.)
Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable
Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions
PM ~ 1027.5 1027.9 0.4 0.4 1027.9
PM 10t-
636 636.4 0.4e
SOz ~ 267.1 267.5 0.4 0.4 267.5
VOC ~ 1347.7 1348.1 0.4 0.4 1348.1
CO r 1393.3 1394.2 0.9
NOx ~ 986.5 990 3.5 3.5 990
Pb 1::1 0.27 0.27 0 0 0.27
Acetaldehyde 44.18 44.19 0.01
Acrolein r 11.87 11.88 0.01
Antimony 0 0 0
Arsenic f' 0 0 0
Benzene r 11.65 11.67 0.02
Biphenyl 0.35 0.35 0
Cadmium r 0 0 0
Carbon Tetrachloride 0 0 0
Chloroform 0 0 0
Chromium 0 0 0
Cobalt r 0 0 0
Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable
Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions
Cumene r 0 0 0
Ethylene Dichloride r" 0 0 0
Formaldehyde r 13.65 13.67 0.02
Hexane 1.58 1.58 0
Hydrochloric Acid* ~ 63.17 63.17 0 0 63.17
Manganese r" 4.3 4.3 0
Mercury r- 0 0 0
Methanol 247.48 247.48 0
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone r" 0.63 0.63 0
Napthalene r 0.86 0.87 0.01
Nickel r 0 0 0
Phenol r 0.31 0.31 0
Propionaldehyde r 0.12 0.12 0
Selenium f' 0 0 0
Styrene 5.47 5.47 0
Toluene r 3.11 3.12 0.01
1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene r- 0.17 0.17 0
1,1,2 Trichloroethane r~' 0 0 0
Trichloroethylene r 0.97 0.97 0
m,pXylene r 0.43 0.43 0
o Xylene r- 0.38 0.38 0
Acetone* W 8.3 8.3 0 0 8.3
Ammonia* W 44.97 44.97 0 0 44.97
Benzaldehyde r 0 0 0
Butane r 1.85 1.85 0
Copper* W 0 0 0 0 0
Cyclohexanone 0 0 0
p-Cymene 0 0 0
Dimethyl Sulfider-j 0 0 0
1,2 Dichloroethylene r 0 0 0
Dichloromethane 0 0 0
Dimethyl Disulfide r 0 0 0
Ethane r: 2.73 2.73 0
Ethanol 0 0 0
N-Hexane r-0 0, 0
Hydrogen Sulfide* f';;; 0 0 0 0 0Isopropanol r 0 0 0
Methane r 701.62 701.62 0
Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable
Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions
Methyl Mercaptan r 0 0 0
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0 0 0
Pentane 2.29 2.29 0
a-Pinene 0 0 0
b-Pinene 0 0 0
Propane 1.41 1.41 0
Silver* 0 0 0
Sulfuric Acid* !\i 4.38 4.38 0 0 4.38
Terpenes W 0 0 0 0 0
TRS r'" 203.51 203.51 0
Methylene Chloride r 0.11 0.11 0
Tetrachloroethylene r 0.11 0.11 0
1,3 Butadiene 0 0.0005 0.0005
Propylene 0 0 0