+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2007 River Dunavin Albuquerque Public Schools.

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2007 River Dunavin Albuquerque Public Schools.

Date post: 26-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: roderick-lyons
View: 217 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
47
Statistical Peers Statistical Peers for Benchmarking for Benchmarking 2007 2007 River Dunavin River Dunavin Albuquerque Public Schools Albuquerque Public Schools
Transcript
  • Slide 1
  • Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2007 River Dunavin Albuquerque Public Schools
  • Slide 2
  • Using Statistical Peers to Benchmark School Performance and Increase Collaboration with Principals from Successful Schools Having Similar Populations Council of the Great City Schools Annual Fall Conference Nashville 2007 River Dunavin Albuquerque Public Schools
  • Slide 3
  • RDA / rDu / 09073 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking Grouping tool Using tool with 2007 SBA results
  • Slide 4
  • RDA / rDu / 09074 12 Group Feeder System Albuquerque HS Jefferson MSWashington MS Lowell ES L. Wallace ES Longfellow ES E. Field ES E. San Jose ES D. Gonzales ES Monte Vista ES Montezuma ESR. Chavez ES Zia ES
  • Slide 5
  • RDA / rDu / 09075 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking Administrators & other educators ask, Which schools are most similar? Which schools are most similar?
  • Slide 6
  • RDA / rDu / 09076 Statistical Peers Purpose 1) Identify comparable schools using a data-driven strategy Which schools have most similar student populations? 2) Encourage best practice collaboration 2) Encourage best practice collaboration
  • Slide 7
  • RDA / rDu / 09077 Statistical Peers Development Variables considered for grouping analyses: FRPMELL Ethnicity Special Ed.Mobility Homeless Enrollment
  • Slide 8
  • RDA / rDu / 09078 Statistical Peers Development K-means cluster analysis assigns group membership Panel of experts identifies best fit from several options
  • Slide 9
  • RDA / rDu / 09079 Statistical Peers Development 26 APS MiddleSchools Group A Group B Group C
  • Slide 10
  • RDA / rDu / 090710 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking Albuquerque Feeder Group Albuquerque Jefferson Washington Dolores Gonzales East San Jose Eugene Field Lew Wallace Longfellow Lowell Monte Vista Montezuma Reginald Chavez Zia Statistical Peers Group 5 Statistical Peers Group 4 Statistical Peers Group 3 Statistical Peers Group 2 Statistical Peers Group 1 Statistical Peers Group 9 Statistical Peers Group 7 Statistical Peers Group 11
  • Slide 11
  • RDA / rDu / 090711 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 7 Schools StatPeers Group 8 Garfield Jimmy Carter John Adams Kennedy McKinley Taft Wilson 5 APS Feeders in Group 8 West Mesa Manzano Del Norte West Mesa Valley Highland
  • Slide 12
  • RDA / rDu / 090712 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 1 Special Ed. Intensive Support Program site 2 Site for Blind / Visually Impaired program 3 Site for Deaf / Hard of Hearing program Schools with select special programs are identified Statistical Peers Group 10 Desert Ridge 1 Eisenhower Hoover 1 Madison 1 Roosevelt Cleveland Grant Jackson 2 Jefferson James Monroe LB Johnson 1 Taylor Statistical Peers Group 9 Garfield Jimmy Carter John Adams 1 Kennedy 1 McKinley 3 Taft 1 Wilson Statistical Peers Group 8 Ernie Pyle Harrison Hayes 1 Polk 1 Truman Van Buren Washington Statistical Peers Group 7
  • Slide 13
  • RDA / rDu / 090713 Statistical Peers for Benchmarking Now how to use this tool?
  • Slide 14
  • RDA / rDu / 090714 Peer Group Reading APS Predicted Solid bars show schools percent proficient achieved. Hairlines show predicted achievement range (95% confidence interval). Within Near Exceeds Blue line is Reading AMO 2007 NMSBA (5-8 MS = 42%)Blue line is Reading AMO 2007 NMSBA (5-8 MS = 42%) Beat AMO & yet below prediction
  • Slide 15
  • RDA / rDu / 090715 Math Proficiency & Prediction SBA Predicted % proficient Middle Schools Confidence interval
  • Slide 16
  • RDA / rDu / 090716 Peer Group 9 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Red line is Math AMO 2007 NMSBA (20%) Future AMOs
  • Slide 17
  • RDA / rDu / 090717 Peer Group 9 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Schools less similar % FRPM, % ELL, etc. Schools more similar % FRPM, % ELL, etc.
  • Slide 18
  • RDA / rDu / 090718 Peer Group 1 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA
  • Slide 19
  • RDA / rDu / 090719 Why Use Statistical Peers for Benchmarking? Data-driven grouping option Increase collaboration Share paths of success with statistical peers Identify strategies that are effective with similar students
  • Slide 20
  • RDA / rDu / 090720 Some Ways to Compare Outcome measures SBA, Short-cycle assessments Graduation rate Process indicators Teacher collaboration time % ICs time on essential functions Instructional programs Dual language Math / Science labs
  • Slide 21
  • RDA / rDu / 090721 Using the Tool Other uses Considering program change Breakout groups for PD training
  • Slide 22
  • RDA / rDu / 090722 Contact River Dunavin 848-8743 [email protected] Research & Evaluation Team Research, Development, and Accountability Dept. Albuquerque, Public Schools 16 RDA / rDu / 0907
  • Slide 23
  • 23 Report Data Table 3 UPM: Underperforming Minorities
  • Slide 24
  • RDA / rDu / 090724 Peer Group 1 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 25
  • RDA / rDu / 090725 Peer Group 1 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 26
  • RDA / rDu / 090726 Peer Group 2 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 27
  • RDA / rDu / 090727 Peer Group 2 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 28
  • RDA / rDu / 090728 Peer Group 3 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 29
  • RDA / rDu / 090729 Peer Group 3 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 30
  • RDA / rDu / 090730 Peer Group 4 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 31
  • RDA / rDu / 090731 Peer Group 4 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 32
  • RDA / rDu / 090732 Peer Group 5 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 33
  • RDA / rDu / 090733 Peer Group 5 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 34
  • RDA / rDu / 090734 Peer Group 6 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 35
  • RDA / rDu / 090735 Peer Group 6 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 36
  • RDA / rDu / 090736 Peer Group 7 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 37
  • RDA / rDu / 090737 Peer Group 7 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 38
  • RDA / rDu / 090738 Peer Group 8 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 39
  • RDA / rDu / 090739 Peer Group 8 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 40
  • RDA / rDu / 090740 Peer Group 9 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 41
  • RDA / rDu / 090741 Peer Group 9 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 42
  • RDA / rDu / 090742 Peer Group 10 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 43
  • RDA / rDu / 090743 Peer Group 10 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 44
  • RDA / rDu / 090744 Peer Group 11 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMO
  • Slide 45
  • RDA / rDu / 090745 Peer Group 11 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 46
  • RDA / rDu / 090746 Peer Group 12 Math APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs
  • Slide 47
  • RDA / rDu / 090747 Peer Group 12 Reading APS Predicted 2007 SBA Future AMOs

Recommended