STATOR MAGNETIC CORE
DESIGN, DETERIORATION
AND FAILURE
CLYDE MAUGHAN, PRESIDENT
MAUGHAN GENERATOR CONSULTANTS
SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK
Phone: 518 377 5351
Email: cmaughan@nycap,rr,com Web: clydemaughan.com
1
CORE HISTORICAL
PERFORMANCE
COMMON MAINTENANCE
– MINOR MECHANICAL DAMAGE
– MINOR LOCAL OR GENERAL LOOSENESS
OCCASIONAL MAJOR FAILURES
– LARGE MAGNETIC OBJECT IN THE AIRGAP
– FRACTURE OF A STATOR BAR
– GROSS CLAMPING FORCE LOOSENESS
– OVER-FLUXING
RARE CATASTROPHIC SPONTANEOUS
(WEAR-OUT) MELTDOWN
2
STATOR CORE DESIGN &
CONSTRUCTION
THE CORE PROVIDES THREE BASIC
FUNCTIONS
– 1) PATH FOR THE MAGNETIC FLUX
– 2) SUPPORT FOR THE STATOR BARS
– 3) SHIELDS THE STATOR BAR
CONDUCTORS FROM AIR-GAP
FLUX
4
3) MAGNETIC SHIELD FROM
THE AIR-GAP FLUX
A VITAL FUNCTION NOT OFTEN DISCUSSED
TYPICAL HIGH-SPEED GENERATOR
– TOP OF THE CONDUCTOR (STRANDS) IS AT A DEPTH
WHERE VIRTUALLY ALL OF THE AIR-GAP FLUX HAS
ALREADY TRANSFERRED INTO THE LOW-RELUCTANCE
MAGNETIC TOOTH
– THUS THERE IS LITTLE IF ANY SIDE THRUST ON ANY
PORTION OF THE CONDUCTORS
– WITHOUT THIS MAGNETIC SHIELDING OF THE BAR
CONDUCTORS, THERE WOULD BE A VERY HIGH SIDE-
THRUST ON THESE CONDUCTORS
» DOUBTFUL THAT ANY ELECTRICAL INSULATION SYSTEM
KNOWN COULD RESTRAIN THESE FORCES WITHOUT
FAILING
5
CORE AND FRAME DESIGN
INHERENTLY COMPLEX STRUCTURE
ADDITIONAL 2-POLE GENERATOR
COMPLICATION
– THE HUGE MAGNETIC PULL OF THE ROTOR AIRGAP
FLUX ON THE CORE CAUSES THE CORE TO DEFORM
INTO AN OVAL
» THIS DEFORMATION IS SMALL, ABOUT 2 MILS ON A WELL-
DESIGNED UNIT
– BUT MUST PROVIDE FOR ISOLATION OF THE FRAME
FROM THIS CORE MAGNETIC DEFORMATION
» NUMEROUS APPROACHES TAKEN, MOSTLY SUCCESSFUL
9
UNSUCCESSFUL ISOLATION
CAUSE: COST REDUCTION
– LOW-PROPERTY STEEL
» CRACKS
– INEFFECTIVE ISOLATION
» MAYBE VIBRATION TRANSMITTAL
» MAYBE FATIGUE CRACKS
– NO ISOLATION
» SEVERE FRAME VIBRATIONS
» HIGH NOISE LEVELS, 116DB
» EXPOSURE TO FRAME AND FOUNDATION CRACKING
» NO FIX, REPLACE STATOR, OR GENERATOR
14
INSPECTION OF CORE OUTSIDE
DIAMETER
ON MOST GENERATORS THESE BURN LOCATIONS CAN BE
SEEN DURING A CAREFUL INSPECTION OF THE CORE OD
AT THE ENDS OF THE CORE
THESE LOCAL HOT SPOTS PROBABLY NOT A CONCERN, IN
AND OF THEMSELVES
– THE LAMINATIONS ARE ALREADY SHORTED TOGETHER BY
CONTACT WITH THE KEYBARS
– SO UNLESS THE BURN (WHICH IS DRIVEN BY KEYBAR
VOLTAGE, NOT AIRGAP FLUX) BEGINS TO GROW IN DEPTH, IT
SHOULD DO NO HARM
BUT THE BURNS LOOK SUSPICIOUSLY LIKE THE
CORES THAT FAILED FROM OVER-FLUX . . .
41
STILL, FOR ALL MY WORRYING . . .
THERE ARE MANY HUNDREDS OF GENERATORS OF THIS
GENERAL DESIGN IN SERVICE
– APPARENTLY NONE HAS FAILED DUE TO THIS CURRENT
FLOW
– THUS IT APPEARS LIKELY THAT THESE DESIGNS ARE SAFE
SO THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY THAT I HAVE BEEN
WORRYING ABOUT HIGH BACK-IRON FLUX DENSITIES
OVER NOTHING
BUT JUST A MINUTE . . .
46
RECENT GENERATOR FAILURE
ONE OF 9 LARGE, NEW GENERATORS IN THE USA
– 850-1100 MVA
– JAPANESE OEM
CORE FAILURE
– FAILED WITH CORE DAMAGE APPEARANCE SIMILAR TO THE
CORE FAILURES JUST DESCRIBED
– UNIT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED OVER-FLUX
– THUS FAR THE OEM HAS NOT MADE AVAILABLE TO THE
INDUSTRY THE ROOT CAUSE OF FAILURE
BUT OTHER UNITS OF DUPLICATE DESIGN HAVE HOT
SPOTS ON BACK OF CORE
47
TEST & INSPECTION DILEMMA
TEST
– DAMAGE AT THE BOTTOM-OF-SLOT LOCATION
» DETECTABLE BY LOW FLUX TEST
» MAY BE DETECTABLE BY HIGH FLUX (IF SIGNIFICANT
AND TEST IS WELL PERFORMED)
– DAMAGE AT CORE OD
» NEITHER TEST WILL DETECT
INSPECTION
– BOTTOM OF SLOT
» MAYBE BY BORESCOPE
– OD
» POSSIBLE ON SOME DESIGNS, WITH DIFFICULTY
50
ROOT CAUSE
OPINION OF THE EXPERTS (IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY FROM
THE LIMITED INFORMATION PUBLICLY AVAILABLE)
– THE CURRENT IS FLOWING LOCALLY BETWEEN PAIRS OF KEYBARS, A
PARTIAL AMORTISSEUR WINDING
– (BUT THIS DOES NOT EXPLAIN BURNING AT THE BOTTOM OF SLOTS)
MY OPINION:
– THE CURRENT THAT HAS TRANSFERRED TO THE LAMINATIONS WILL
TRAVERSE THE 180O PATH PASSING FROM LAMINATION TO
LAMINATION THROUGH THE LAMINATION INSULATION
» WITH THE KEYBAR SYSTEM ACTING AS THE AMORTISSEUR
WINDING OF AN INDUCTION MOTOR
– THUS FOCUSING BURN DAMAGE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOTS, THE
LOCATION OF ADJACENT LAMINATIONS
– ALSO THE LOCATION OF THE OVER-FLUXED CORE FAILURES
WHOSE OPINION ARE YOU GOING TO BELIEVE???
51
SUMMARY
THE FOCUS, THEN, OF THIS PAPER (AND MY 5-YEAR CAMPAIGN)
– ENCOURAGING DISCUSSION WHICH MAY ASSIST IN BETTER
INDUSTRY UNDERSTANDING OF CORE DETERIORATION
» AUGUST 2015 EPRI MINNEAPOLIS MEETING
– AND THEREBY HOPEFULLY LEAD TO REDUCED EXPOSURE TO
THE FORTUNATELY UNCOMMON BUT UNFORTUNATELY
POTENTIALLY ENORMOUSLY EXPENSIVE EXPOSURE TO CORE
FAILURE
CERTAINLY THERE ARE ERRORS (PROBABLY BIG ERRORS) AND
MISCONCEPTIONS IN WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN AND AM
SAYING
– HOPEFULLY, OTHERS WITH MORE INFORMATION AND
DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE BASES (AND SMARTER THAN ME) WILL
OFFER CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTION
52
CONCLUSION
HOPEFULLY WITH TIME, AND BROADER DIALOGUE
AMONG CORE EXPERTS, CORES WILL BECOME BETTER
UNDERSTOOD IN THE INDUSTRY
WITH THIS IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING SHOULD COME
INCREASED GENERATOR RELIABILITY AND LOWER COST
OF POWER PLANT OPERATION
QUESTIONS ON THIS TOPIC, OR ON SERVICE PROBLEMS
– EMAIL ME OR PHONE ME (MY MIND STILL SEEMS TO WORK, WELL
I THINK IT DOES)
OR TALK WITH ONE OF THE FOLKS WHO KNOWS MORE
THAN I ABOUT GENERATORS
53
IGTC . . .
WEB SITE: IGTC (International Generator Technical Community)
www.generatortechnicalforum.org INITIATED BY NATIONAL ELECTRIC COIL 5 YEARS AGO
IF YOU AREN’T ON THIS REMARKABLE SITE, YOU SHOULD BE, WITH 2800+ OTHERS
BONUS (DOWNLOAD, NO CHARGE) ON THIS SITE AT “INNER WATER-COOLED STATOR WINDINGS”
UNDER “DOCUMENTS”
MY RECENT “LIBRARY” OF 28 TECHNICAL PAPERS AND 240-PAGE BOOK ON GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
SITE HAS BEEN BROADENED TO SUPPORT THIS GENERATOR USERS GROUP
ANNOUNCEMENTS
PRODUCT OF THE GUG MEETINGS