EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MARI]IIA FEASIBITITY STUDY

CITY OF TRENTONT

by

Philpott AssociatesCoastal Engineers Limited

in association with

R.E.\Tinter & Associates Ltd.

Laventhol & Horwath

Michael Michalski Associates

November, 1988

PHILPOTT ASSOCIATES COASTAL ENGINFEFS L llvlITED111 ¡¡erton Streel,SLlite 202, Toronio. Ontario Canada íVl45 3A/

Telephone: ir l6) 487. 1 ?†Fax Se¡vrce (¡i 16) 489-e 35]

tct,:ber 3Ø, 1'lB8

The C':,rp,:,råti,¡n ¡:'f the City ,:f Trent'=nCity Ha1 IË5 Dundas Street l¡lestP, O, En:': 4?01Trent':,nr Dntar ic,t';gv 5RË

Attenti,¡n: I'lr. Charlie I'lurpl-ryr l"l. Sc.Citv P I anner

Dear Sirr

I'lar ina Feasibi 1i ty St r-rdY

trity af Trentc'nOur File B8-':?3

We åre pleased t'= have the ':pp':rttlnitystudy f ar ynu. hle hope this t¡í 11 be åchançles aIr-'ng Trentont s waterfr':nt.

t,= complete this feasibilitystart ':f ner¿ú, Elxciting

Re

This exErcr-ttive srirnrnåry c'fvFrs the main igsr¡es,:nIy and prr:rvidegc':ndense ':ut1ínes ':f Ëur findings. F,-rr further details we refer thereader t'= the f inal repnrt.

Y,:'rlrs trUly,

PHILPOTT ASSOCIATES ËOASTAL ENEINEERS LIHITED

'-')

1"4. Str-rrm, P. Eng,

l,ts/msEncls.

TABLE BF CONTENTS

Intr,rducti':nReview c'f Existing FacilitiesMarÞ;et Demand and prc,jectiansReview nf Potential SitesDevel,:pment nf Ë¡=ncepts at Potential SitesPublic InputPref erred C,rncept DeveloPrnentDevelapment Er:sts and FundingEcr,n':mic Impact af Devel,rpment

Figure IFigure 2Figure ãFigure 4Figure 5Figure 6

1

1.:tÉ3555

111.+

B1t1415

2467gø1

Table ITable 2Table 3Table 4

LIST BF FTËURES

Locatir=n PIan -Pr,:vincial Eontractþlaterf ront Site PlanEoncept 1 Site PIanEancept 'l Site PIanCancept 3 Site PlanPreferred EoncePt Site PIan

LIST OF TABLES

Ëost Estimates Summary, Ênncepts 1 to 3Detailed Êost Estimate, Preferred ConceptEconomic Impact SurnmarYProposed Phase I Cost Breakdc,wn and Allocatic,ns

I

INTRT]DUCTICIN

Recreational b'=ating is an expanding industry whi ch ':f f ersc,:nsiderable ecc,n,:mic benefít ts municipalities which are able tc'take advantage nf their locati,:n nn navigable waters. Thesebenefits cc'fne frarn expenditures by boaters, bclth loca1 andvisiting, and frnrn additional employrnent created in the localecc'nË'rny. The City af Trentr-'n is a municipality located '¡n such awaterway, Fy fnany penplets descripti':n, Trentc'n is located atthe start,:f some,:f the best boating v¡aters in Canada. Thelc,catir¡n of the site, is presented on Figure 1.

Ëity of Trentc,n has recognized that in ':rder to take advantage nfits lncation and capture the potential benefitsr å first classrnarina facility is required. In,:rder to attract baaters andenc'surage their stay and theref'¡re spending in the communitytf ull rañge of selrvices and amenities required by boaters u¿illneed to farrn a part øî the waterfrsnt development.

The purpose af the study uras tcr review supply and demandgituation af the boating market, to review and select å potentialsite for the development of a marina and to develsP a concept atthe preferred s,ite. However, it is recngnized that the marinaconcept must not be a stand alane facifity but rather a componentaf the Trenton waterfront development and be a complement to thecornrnercial and retaiL facilities c¡f Trenton.

REVIEW OF EXISTING FACILITIES

The Trentsn area has three existing facilitiesr namely Robertpatrick l,larina, Frager Park Harina and Ë.F.Ë. Trentgn Yacht Club.

The R,=bert Patrick Harina is located on the east sideriver and pr'3vides åPproximately lEO geasonal sIips.depth in the facility does nst allar¡ fixed keel craftpowercraft to use this site,

The Fraser Park l"larina ig å transient boating facility ':peratedby the trity of Trenton on the west side c,f the river immediatelysouth of the Dundas Street Eridge. The cåFacity ,:f this facilityis åpproximately 28 to 30 bsats depending on size c'f the visitingcrafLs. Washrûorns ånd ghswers are prüvided. This facility dtresnr¡t rneet current transient needs.

The C.F.B. Trent,:n Yatch CIub provides åpprûximately BEI seasonalslips and ?7 moc'ring buoys. The facility is also hampered withlimited depth.

ef theThe limited¡3r Iar ge

ONÍAR IOLAK E

,{, rßrç

rA

FHIfOTTASSOCHTESln co.oD¡r¡llo¡ rllhTVINIER ASSOCIATESLâVENTþLA HOR\IA:T}IldcHAEL mCHAt-sr( ASSæAÍ ES

Fiqure I

Locotion Plon- Provinciol Context

N)

3

HARI4ET DEI''IAND AND PROJECTIONS

The review ,¡f the demand¡ bnth for selas'-rnðI and transient boatstidentified immediate deficiency nf åpPrÐximately 1øCl slips.Appraxirnately 2ø to 352 of these Ehculd be available fortransient. The review alsa identified strong demand forla¡¡nching faci I ities'

Lrng term pro.jectic,ns indicate that, å rnarina shc,¡.tId be designedtc, åttow for !øEt to 35Et slips. Facility,¡f this size will f.ikelybe required in 5 trt 7 yeår5. It is possible thatr sharuld thismarina facility establish itself as a premier develapmentr wellliked by the bs'aters for its service and facilitiesr thetransient cnrnponent ,:f the marina c,:uld increase abc,ve theanticipated lø to 25U.

REVIEW OF POTENTIAL SITES

Three potential sites urereårel identif ied 'rn Figure ?

Site I r Eoncept 1: East shoreStreet and

Site Ë, Concept 7¿

identified and reviewed.and referred to as¡

The sites

,=f Trent River between DundasMcDonald Bridge.

East shûre of the Trent River in the area c'fthe existing Robert Patrick Harina.

Site 3, Ëancept 3¡ West ghore nf the Trent Riverof Albert Street knswn as theProperty.

direct Ly s'3uthJamest

v¿ou 1dideal

the highin the

AIl gite werÊ revierled with respect to conformity with officialplan, Toning By-Laws, pedestrian and vehicular accesstavailability of municipal servicesr environmental constraintstwater depth, boat accessibility, land awnership, compatibility afwith surrounding land useg and proximity to EentraL Ëus,inessDistríct c'f the trity of Trenton.

Review gf envir,:nmental cnnstraints suggest that tws potentialproblem åreås rnay exist. First deals with potentialcontamination c¡f sediment, should any dredging be required forthe development. Second deal,s with petential impact ':¡n f igherieshabitat. In both areag ,:f crncern a site specif ic and detailedgtudies will need tc¡ be undertaken to resolve these issues.

Site 1 was found least suitable due limited size sf developmentit could support and due to the limited accessibitity tnsailhc,atg, The new Dundas Street Fridge will limit åccess tsboats 5.8 m in height Ér less.

Develnpment at Site t, although gufficient in sieeteliminate the existing 1oE slip and pravide less thanaccess to the ccrmrnercial core gf the Ëity. As welltcost ¡lf bedrock refnúval to achieve tl'rg required depthmarina basin rnakeg this location less attractive.

Ão

óL

,-''lI

SITE 3

SITE 2

SITE ¡

PÞT.POTTASSOCIATESIn co.og¡rclhnrlll¡UNTTER ASSOCIATESLAVENTHOLS }IfiIIIAf}IMICT{AEL MICHA¡.SKI ASSOCI¡IIES

Figure 2, Woterfront Site Plon

City of Trenton - Morino Feosibility Study ^

J

Site B appears to meet aI I f uncti'=nal criteria. However r a ma jarpartion oi the site is in private c,wnership and the co-':'Ferationr-,f the swner mugt be secured. In support 'rf thist the Eity l-råE

obtained a letter f rc,m the ,¡r¡ner indicating that he is preparedtc, prc,vide åcce55 aIr¡ng the waterfrc'nt.

DEVELBPHENT OF ËONCEPTS AT FOTENTIAL SITES

A cnncept f,rr ä marina devel':'Fment wa=, prepared for eachthree putential sites identified in the previnus sectinn'c,:ncepts åre presented in Figures 3r 4 and 5.

*f theThese

Éoncept 1pr,:vides dacking facilities f':r åpprtximately ?58bsats. cc¡ncepts Ë and 3 are apFroximately c'f equal sizetpr,rviding 33Ø and 34Qt slip respectively. CIther features nf theàevelnpmÀnts are similar. AIl include the nece:iËary crrestal andrnarina protecti,:n structures, site develapment, landscaping andgtreetscaping al.ong åccess route to dor,¿ntourn. The facilities forbc,aters include serviced and unËerviced docks, a marina centrewhich pr,:vides was,hrÈrÊrfns, shc'wers, laundry and suppLy store. A

restaurant, catering to both boaters and non-bsatersr is proposedtc, form å part,¡f the Marina centre for Ëoncepts ? and 3. Themarina service åreå pr'fvides gas and Pump c¡ut.

Day use årea, namely boat launching facilitiesr are located cln

the east side of the river between the Canadian Tire prnperty andthe existing R,=bertj Patrick l"larina. Tr¡c, double Iaunch rarnFs withparking for approximately 18tr caY/trailer combinatic¡n areþtouidåd. Overflow parking ig available in the Centennial Park.itrir facility is cÐrnrnon to all Ëoncepts. The land required forthis facility is or¡ned hy the City of Trentc'n.

The cc,nstructian cssts '=f the concepts range frc,m 1S3r553reløet t'f,t$Ër454røøø. A sumrnary of theg,e costs is presented in Table 1.

PUËLItr INPUT

The three concept were presented tcr the publ'ic at an rf,Pen h'¡useheld Ðn August 2nd, 19gg in the Ëity ':¡f Trenton' A questiannairewas digtributed to all attendees and thrnugh the municipal,:fficefollowing the meeting. The respensÊ ,¡f the public dr-tring themeeting and the returned questi'3nnåire5 indicate str':ng,:pposiùinn to Site 1, mixed npinians about the suitibility ':fSite 2 and very strong suPPr:rrt for site 3'

PREFERRED CCINCEPT DEVELCIPI-'IENT

tÁ,ith strang suppûrt of the public and frnm the steeringcnmmittee, ,Êt preferred concept 1c'cated at Site 3 was, developed'The preferred concept follaws the generåI layout establi=hed inc,:¡ncept 3, and attempts to 'rptimi¡e the use tlf land and waterarea and minimize c,rngtructic,n csst. The preferred concept iEpresented in Figure Ë.

6

\-/-t

oti

MP

¿\\./

l

!

I

ô()

CONCEFTo 50 t00 2OOlrr-LJ-

o

l

III

\".

crrY oF TRËNIQNtr/arina Feasibility Study

\

Ii

I

À-i-- PHLPOTT ASSOCÙATES, ¡tæ€rü¡¡ñi wl.frEn AssoclAïEs' L rEt{I}loLtl-loFvrATtl

t clutr- l/rcflA¡Sx¡ ASSOCU¡E¡ ffii \

Figure.3

Sile Plon,

Concept I

7

o3

aL

PARKING

-. .l\)

lf\ DOUBLE

LAUNCHRA¡vlP

MARINACENTRE

t\\-/

!¡lri,

L.-

(ß.. I .a-\'F-

\\- \J

CONCEPT 20 50 ro0 200f r

-LJ-'vì-

I

III

I

\ab

PHLPOTT ASSOCIATES¡l@çtrrlhwr¡reR ¡ssoa¡rESL¡t ENIHOL e HOFltl$Hrrct{AE- r¿rc+{ tsxl ÂssæArE

CTTY OF TRENTONMarina Feasibility Study

o

Figure 4

Site Plon,Concept 2

ffi

Õ

i'\\

\\

{ir/4

r-l

Aп

b,I

öiì

.j

t1\

- '-r

J

t,rl

i g¿-tl,j,l ' ii

RAMP ito

I

I

L

\

)I

i

\'l

/1

;

CITY OF TRENTONMarina Feasibility Study

fHH"grI.ASSoc^rES OWINIER ASSOCIATESi#*ffimË**.. ffi

I

lo¡

Figure 5

Sile Plon,

Concept 3

5

CITY OFEBST

TRENTON . HARTNAESTIHATE SUHHARY

TAÉLE

FEASIBILITY-trONCEPT5 1

1

STUDYT03

1 CENEEPT I( r$ 1Bx3 )

ITET,I CONSTRUCTION EEI"IPBNENT

1. COASTAL PRNTECTION

Earth FillingE'¡' AVat ir:rnDredgingBreal:water.sInner Easin Edges

':. DAY UsE AREAS

EartFr Fillingl-sunch RamPs tl D':rlble)Parkinq AreasLandscaping'ç:t PIan'bingSite Servicing5l-r¡:re Prr:te çf, ir:,n

3. BTAT SLTPS

Ser v i ced D': cl:sUnserviced D'lrcliËDay Use/Service Dncl':s

4. BUILÞINGs

Marina tentreGas/ Pr.tmp -,:rr-tt CentreResta¡-trant

5. LANDSCAPING/PARþI FACILITIES

Buffer PlantinçtGeneral LandscåPÉ W'¡rllEnardwal l,:

Plaza Pavinghla 1 kwaysStreetscåFePar king

Ë. SITE sERVICINË

Stnrm/SanitarY Sewerst¡later Sr-rpp LyElectrical/Lighting

TOTAL ËNNSTRUCTTTN CÛ57CONTINGENCTES/FEESTOTAL FROJEtrT CtrSTs

ËBNCEPT( tË 1Ø:¿3l

ËONEEPT 3( $ 1Ø:¿3)

8øøØ

4:lø4{ ÊJrIJ

:øø14ø1':ø

eñ.JUJ

5ø84

3øøñtÉ.t¡.J

ø

1øø¿J

ø

1Aø1øø4':IEl.J

tø1øø{õÉI (JtJ

.:.+ t¿J

'J',Z5

1, :f5øJ(f 'J:4ø

':øø1'+ø1'1ø

5ø5ø84

3øB55Ut

ø

':øø':5

':øø

1øø':øø

Ø

1øø7ø

15ø1!Ë

1 Elø5ø

15ø

5, 4551, gg1.6,546

4øøø

É-rJI,JË'3ø':' Ct C:¿9U

tøø14ø1:ø5ø

84

3øø6øø7ØØ

: ØØ._re¿J

:øø

1øøËøø

'cØtøø4ø

15ø116

1Bø5ø

tøø

5,379I, q7Ë6,454

g05ø

LøØ

: r'3Ë IËl¡.-r"Jfd.

3,553

\-t

v-ú

d

(-.

IC

f

,aot

ù

\ råj L)

.gù

v

\ /'

-,.\

!I É'€ i! Êj

u

C

d ì'-) a-

-. j

!

r'o

,o'o

o

>!

".b

çoã {^ gË

t- \\-)

(

./I )

,' ).

( qô

i b Q

(f

("

// '1Í

o-rS

tJ

I /

I*-=

.''a

./..

çt'

7/'

-fn' o

\\ N\\

ìrn

Iu¡

Ii

I t\

.,'T

'a .-rn

,.Ïm 7' ft

. rf

l g c) o z c) m -ft I

sg =<

Ð-o

,d'-l

N -.

rcn

4e.

¡q= (n

o.+

- c¿-

o-

<çÉ

=-o

c)<

z8I

r"*2

#s=

d'

ËË

Ëåq

Ião

t >

I

âãt

g I,

q E

Lû

up-" I

ii

.\

lt Ir I t, t_

!

-..._

._J

J-__

)

-a I

'\l

l- t,í

I

O¿

)

ù

\ t I

E u

I I Ill ll t.l I

I I I i I

op

11

The marina basin ig created by construction '¡f an ,:f f -sh':'retbreakwater, The main mårina entrance is Iocated between thiEbreakwater and å peninsula created by an eastward extension thee:cisting landf':rm. A secondary rnarina entrance is located in thenorth end,:f the basin directly ':ppasite the marina serviceåreå, Fuel r Fump-c,ut and repair service are prtlvided in theservice årea. A marina centre is located directly apposite thernain entrance. This facility cc'rnPriseg r,,¡ashrcr,-rrDsr shr:ttlerstlar-rndry f acil ities as weI l as year r,:und restaurant.

The basin h,:uses !36 seas'rnåI slips of åverage size c'f I meters(3ø f t.I and 1øø transient slips. The size distributies r-¡f thetransient slips is 44 ,:f 12 meter (.4ø f t. ) slips and 5Ë ,:f Irneter slips. Larger vessels c;¡n be dacked at the end 'rf rnaindr-,cks ,lr alc'ng the baardwalll sh':re. Depending¡ nn the actualnumber c,f transient b¡ats, some ':f the slips designated åstransient may need to be utilized f,=r seasonal slips.

Public åreås åre pr'rvided alang the shc'res '¡f the marina and theriver. 5trúng pedestrian c'fnnectic'n is prc¡vided ts thecnmmercial core of the city via Albert Street. A waterfrsntsquåre is located at the sc¡r-rth end crf Albert Street, Frc,m thispoint, a b,:ardwalk extendg arc'und the nrrrth and west shc¡re of thebasin. Accegs al,rng the sonth årrn af the landf,:rm is prc,vided tothe marina entrånce, A functic,nal hist'=ric lighthr¡use isproposed neår the entrance. Fully landscaped grorrnds withpr¡tential fnr shnre f ishing along the south side are proposed f,=rthe s,:uth arrn.

Parking ftrr apFrg..4imately 15ø vehicleg is Frt'vided in thenorth -west cÊrner ,:f the site. A drc'p-c,f f is located alc,ng thensrth side,:f the marina.

The day use rrr laltnching facilities are provided ûn the east side,:f the river between the Ëanadian Tire prûF€lrty and the existingRabert Patrick rnarina. One dc'uble launch rarnp and parking fnråpprü:4imately 68 cav / trailer cc,mbinati':ns are pr*posed.

DEVELOPHENT trOST AND FUNDINE

The total develap¡nent cost 'rf the pr'rject is estimated t': beåpprrximately 196, EBgt, øøø. This total c':gt includes aFprgximatelyIrøøørÐØØ at contigencies, design fees and survey costs. A

detailed breakdown of these cost iE prr:vided in Table ä.

There rnåy be potential for assistance in the develc'pment '¡f thisprr-rject under the l"larina Palicy Asgistance Pragram adminigteredby the Small Eraf t Harbc'urs Branch ,:,f the Federal Gc,vernment'This potential financial agsistance d'fes, cårry with strfnecr¡nditir-,ng, which the pr'-1Fc'nent wr¡uld need tg adhere ts. Thesec,rnditians ínclr¡de the transfer CIf waterlnts to federal crowntprc'visic'n fsr matching f unds å5

t

ITEI'I CT]NSTRUCTItrN CB!'IPONENI

CTASTAL PRTTEËTIONSouth Arm and Breakr¡aterRip RirP Crlr'r'ËEartl-r [¿ Rr-ti:h-:1e Fi 11E:,;ter i,:'r Pr':te C t i,:nDeta cl-¡ed Br€al':wåtFr5¡t¡r-t t ¡, Sf¡r;rrË Pr':'tgct i,:rnûredginçFi I I inç [Jperabirl,lrsBa=in Protection5,:'r-tth ArmTransiænt Fasin t¡lest 5h'¡re$Eåç,:nåI Ba:;in, lrJe=t Sl-r,:¡ÍeServi ce AreaDAY USË ARË45Lar:nch Ramp r: d':'r-tble:)Parl': inçt AreaLandscaping l¿ Planting5h'-rre Pr':tecti¡:nFish i ng 5l-re I terSite ServicingBOAT 5L Ï P5Serviced D':rch: sUnserviced Drrrcl:15Day Use/Service D,:'cl': ç3

EIUILDINË5f'larina CentreGas/ Fr-tmP':r-tt Cent reRestar-trantLTINDSCAP I NG./PARI'l FAC I L IT I EsËr-tffer PlantingËenera I Lands cåPÊ W'r,ì'l'lBnardwalþ;Pla¡a PavingNa I kwaysStreetscåpePar l':i ngSTTE SERVICINGSt,:relSanitary Sewers[¡Jater 5r-rppIyElectri cal/LLqhting

TOTAI- CTNSTRUCTION CNSTSCTNTINGENCIES/FEEsTtrTAL PRTJEDT trOSTs

rITY OF TREIq'TüN - T'IARÏI-IADETA I LËD CNST Ë5T T PIATE

TAFLË ':

UNITtrOSTs

i,:'3øJ

3øø1r8øø

.¿ ,J t¿J

i55

.?Øø

':øøËøø

':, øøØ

5ø, øøø1 ,:øø

5Ø, øØø3øø

5, {¡øø5ø, øØø

3tØØø':,5øø

15ø, øøø

L ,'3øø5ø, øøø

1, øøø

15ø, øøø':'øø, øøø

3øø-t *J

5ø1 øø, øøø

7øØ

1øørøøø5ø, øøø

tøø, øøø

FËASIFIL TTY 5ÏUNYPREFERRËD f,TNCËPT

EIUANTITY SUB TBTAL TOTALCOST CDST

(9X 1øX3 {ftx 16X3)

:, ø'3Ë

*

3üø:5, øØØ

3ØØ.-'r-rdi :? {¿,

3øø1 ,8øø

3':, øøø

3bø1i5

'1ØEñ.{.Jt¿r*

'tE/J

45ø1tsø

É'_.Ji.

161441:Ø

3Ø1'-l

5ø*cf,

.J

3ø

3øØ5'tø15ø

':,øø

5ø':øø

I J:'':øøtü'3ø4ø

1øøLø5

LØØ:øøtøø

m

crnm

fn

fn

cfncm

:Ëø m

'3ø rn

:4ø m

6ø rn

1øø u.136 r-t.

1 1.

lØØsq. m

I 1.siØØsq. m

{1I l¡Þ.

1 l. s.3lØ m

tØØØsq. m.tløø rn

1 1.s.15ø itp

._t5Ër:- / "J

1, ø4ø

,,+54

7tØ

4 t'J7 r'3'14

5,965

r_t .sp.1,-lrÞ¡

mt-

ì-I.:ã¡

1Ëf

1

6Ø1

1

I

Fl

4

J

g

61 1.s.I 1. s.tle

13

weIl. as marþ.:et råte chårges. Therepr':¡vided under the Public [¡Jharf Actthe launching rårnp.

The prË'prsnent sh,:uldåFFrË'priate åqencies

may alsc' be some assigtancer,lith respect tÉ, prtr'Visi,=n nf

There appeärs to be Eome pntential for finanrial assistance bythe Prnvincial É,rvernrnent thr*ugh the Hinistry 'rf Toltrism andRecreati,rn r-rnder the Destinatinn East - Major Eapital ProjectsPrngram. Aç wel1, strrfne f unding under the PRIDE prúgrårn fnåy beavailable.

establish formal csntact with theand gubmit fc¡rmaI appLicatic'ns fr-'r ft-tnding.

ECONOHIC II'IPACT

An ecc,nc,mic impact analysis was carried out fc'r å f ive yeardevelaprnent plan. The analysis indi cates that total e:<pendituresin the area ,:rver the f ive yeËrr peri,:d will be r54r471rØ0lEl andtatal econc,mic output created in Ontaricr wil l. be t$lElr 3?B røøø.Further details ,=f this analysis åre prctvided in Table 3.

PHASINE OF II"IPLEI'{ENTATIBN

The prnposed marina and launching facilities can be implementedin sÈages ar phases. First it should be noted that theconstructi'rn c'f the launching ramp and day user f aci I ities on theeast side r-,f the river is completely independent,:f the marinapraject and can be congtructed at any time.

The rnarina project can also be phased. The si=e rf each phasecån be tailored to the avaitable funding. We recommend that thefirst phase includes the cc,nstructic'n,¡f the breakwaterr thesouth årfn peninsula, the basin protectic¡n structurÊsr thecreatic,n ':f å part af the necessary landbase, supply,=f å portionof the serviced ånd unserviced docks as well as cÕnnectic,n ofnecÊEsåry site s,ervices and the provisi':n of siome landscaping.The cost of Phase I is egtimated to be l3 ?r530lrøøø. A breakdown

':f this Phase I cost is pravided in Table 4' A prtpr.¡5gdallocation of costs between the Federal Governmentr utherG,:vernment levels and private sector is also Provided in the sanetable.

CITY OF TRENTON - MARINA FEASIBITITYECONOMIC IMPACT SUMMARY

TÀBLE 3

1991 L992 1993Five Year

Total

18 53

2618

4A7L

46ø5

44L

498

EconomicMuIt iBl lers

2.3L

l_.ø3

9.5 t

1ø.8 t

32.2 Jobs,/$M

r-. 56

Total Dlrect Expendlture ln Àrea

Expendltures by Season Boaters

Expenditures by Transi.ent Boaters

Total Expenditures ln Area

Total Economic Output Createdln Ontarlo

ResutIlng Incone to RegionalRes ldents

Federal Tax Receipts

Provlnclal Tax Recelpts

Dlrect Employment Created

TotaI Enployment Created

Source: Laventhol & Horvath. 1988.

1ø35 161 ø 2ø42 257L 3ø7ø Lø328

L99ø

138

3Lg

448

461

44

5ø

( NOTE:

14

23

23ø

467

697

349

53s

884

5øB

6ø5

1113

199 4

628

7øt

t 329

?1,8 9t_1. L1.46 1,369

69 87 LLø 131

78 98 L24 r.48

Thousand Dollars Per Year)

22 28 36 43

35 44 56 67

HÞ

CITY OF TRENTON MARINÀ FEASIBILITY STUDYPI{ASE 1 COST BREAKDOTíN AND AttOCÀTIONS

TABLE 4

i5

Phase 1 Cost AllocatlonsFederal Other Private

Gov I t.Constructlon Component

COASTAL PROTECTION

Tota ICost

Tota 1Phase 1Cost

RipSoutEartExteDetaSoutDredFl11Bas I

tandscapinShore ProÈFishing ShSite Servi

re

bble Fi11rotectlonreakvatere Protectlon

erat I onsect i on

P lant ingionerg

Rap Coh Àrmh&Rurior Pched Bh Shorg lnglng opn Prot

36øL25

9ø5ø4

7545øL6ø

52t6

L44L2ø

t5ø725ø48

55ø

3øø59øL5ø

2øø5ø

2øø

t5øzøg

569ø4ø

tøør26

Løø5ø

2øø

4983997

598ø

36øL25

9ø5ø4

75ø

L6ø

52t6

L44ø

15øL9ø

ø

g

ø5

Lø2g

5ø3ø

Iøø

zLg6424

253ø

35øø

9ø5ø4

954

L25

9ø

52l6

L44

1søL9ø

25

5Lø2ø

2515

Løø

967

75

7ø

z515

South Arn Basin ShoreTrans lent Bas ln r 9lest ShoreSeasonal Baslnrlfest ShoreServlce Area Shores

DÀY USE ÀREÀStaunch Ramp (double )Parking Areas

g&ecteItcin

øg

øøøø

BOAT SLIPSServiced DocksUnserviced DocksDay Use/Service Docks

BUILDINGSMarina CentreGas,/Pu¡rpout CentreRestaurant

TANDSCÀP I NG,/PÀRK FACIL T TI ESBuffer PlantlngGeneral tandscaPe llorkBoardualkP1aza PavlngIlalkvaysStreetscapeParklng

SITE SERVICINGStorn,/Sanltary Severstlater SupplyElectrical / Llghting

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTCONTINGENCIES / FEES (2ø96\TOTAT PROJECT COST

øøø

ø

25

(NOTE¡ Amounts in Thousands of Dollars)

185