Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | maywayrandom |
View: | 235 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 13
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
1/13
Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verbby MMaatttthheeww SS.. DDrryyeerr
11.. SSiixx ttyyppeess wwiitthh ddoommiinnaanntt oorrddeerrThis map shows the ordering of subject, object, and verb in a
transitive clause, more specifically declarative clauses in which
both the subject and object involve a noun (and not just a
pronoun), as in the EEnngglliisshh sentence in (1).
(1)
[The dog] chased [the cat].
S V O
EEnngglliisshh is SVO (Subject-Verb-Object), because the subject the
dog in (1) precedes the verb while the object the cat follows the
verb.
There are six logically possible orders of the three elements S,
O, and V, as shown in the feature-value table.
VVaalluueess ooff MMaapp 8811AA.. Order of Subject, Object and Verb
Subject-object-verb (SOV) 565
Subject-verb-object (SVO) 488
Verb-subject-object (VSO) 95
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
2/13
Verb-object-subject (VOS) 25
Object-verb-subject (OVS) 11
Object-subject-verb (OSV) 4
Lacking a dominant word order 189
total: 1377
show map
All six of these types are attested; examples of each type are
given in (2).
(2)
a. JJaappaanneessee (KKuunnoo 11997733: 10)
John ga tegami o yon-da.
John SUBJ letter OBJ read-PS
S O V
John read the letter.
b. MMaannddaarriinn (LLii aanndd TThhoommppssoonn 11998811: 217)
Zhngsn shudo-le yi-fng xn.
Zhangsan receive-PERF one-CLF letter
S V O
Zhangsan received a letter.
c. IIrriisshh (DDiilllloonn aanndd CCrriinnnn 11996611: 166)
Lann [na sagairt] [na leabhai
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
3/13
read.PRES the.PL priest.PL the.PL book.PL
V S O
The priests are reading the books.
d. NNiiaass (AAuussttrroonneessiiaann; Sumatra, IInnddoonneessiiaa; BBrroowwnn 22000011:
538)
i-rino vakhe ina-gu
3SG.REALIS-cook ABS.rice mother-
1SG.POSS
V O S
My mother cooked rice.
e. HHiixxkkaarryyaannaa (CCaarriibb; BBrraazziill; DDeerrbbyysshhiirree 11997799: 87)
toto y-ahos-ye kamara
man 3:3-grab-
DISTANT.PST
jaguar
O V S
The jaguar grabbed the man.
f. NNaaddbb (NNaaddaahhuupp; BBrraazziill; WWeeiirr 11999944: 309)
awad kalap haph
jaguar child see.IND
O S V
The child sees the jaguar.
Although all six of these orders are attested, the last two types,
OVS and OSV, in which the object comes first, are rare.
The terms subject and object are used here in a rather
informal semantic sense, to denote the more agent-like and more
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
4/13
patient-like elements respectively. Their use here can be defined
in terms of the notions S, A, and P, where the S is the single
argument in an intransitive clause, the A is the more agent-like
argument in a transitive clause, and the P is the more
patient-like argument in a transitive clause. For the purposes of
this map, then, the term subject is used for the A while the term
object is used for the P. A language shown on the map as SOV
could thus also be equally well and perhaps more accurately
described as APV. Note that many linguists use the terms
subject and object somewhat differently from this, and some
linguists question the applicability of these terms to some
languages, but these issues do not arise with the use of these
terms here. For example, there is controversy surrounding the
question of what ought to be considered the subject in Philippine
languages, like CCeebbuuaannoo (cf. SScchhaacchhtteerr 11997766). CCeebbuuaannoo has
two common ways to express transitive clauses, one of which is
illustrated in (3).
(3) CCeebbuuaannoo (AAuussttrroonneessiiaann; own data)
gi-palit [sa babayi] [ang saging]
GOAL.FOC-buy NONTOP woman TOP banana
The woman bought the bananas.
While there is a question as to which of the two arguments in (3)
should be considered a subject (or whether neither or both
should), in both types of clauses the verb normally comes first,
followed by the A, and then the P. Hence, by the use ofsubject
and object assumed for this map, CCeebbuuaannoo is treated as a VSO
language.
Note that while the position of the subject in intransitive
clauses is generally the same as in transitive clauses, in some
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
5/13
languages this is not the case. See Chapter 8822.
Some languages can be assigned straightforwardly to one of
the six types, because all orders other than one are either
ungrammatical or used relatively infrequently and only in special
pragmatic contexts. Such languages can be said to have rriiggiiddoorrddeerr. There are many other languages in which all six orders
are grammatical. Such languages can be said to have fflleexxiibbllee
oorrddeerr. Flexible order languages are sometimes described as
having free word order, though this is misleading, since there
are often pragmatic factors governing the choice of word order.
We can further distinguish two subtypes of languages with
flexible word order. In some languages with flexible order, there
is one order which is most common and which can be describedas the ddoommiinnaanntt oorrddeerr. In other flexible order languages, the
flexibility is greater and there is no one order that is the
dominant order in terms of frequency of usage or pragmatic
neutrality. Flexible order languages in which one order is
dominant are shown on the map according to that dominant
order in other words, the map does not distinguish rigid order
languages from flexible order languages with a dominant order.
Flexible order languages lacking a dominant order are shown onthe map as lacking a dominant word order. RRuussssiiaann is an
example of a language with flexible word order in which SVO
order can be considered dominant, so RRuussssiiaann is shown on the
map as SVO. See DDeetteerrmmiinniinngg DDoommiinnaanntt WWoorrdd OOrrddeerr.
There are a number of different subtypes of languages lacking
a dominant order which are not distinguished on the map. In
some languages with highly flexible word order, all or mostorders of subject, object, and verb will be possible and common.
NNuunngggguubbuuyyuu (Gunwinyguan; northern AAuussttrraalliiaa) is an example
of such a language (HHeeaatthh 11998844: 507-513; 1986). But some
languages lack a dominant order only because just the subject or
just the object exhibits flexibility with respect to the verb. For
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
6/13
example, SSyyrriiaann AArraabbiicc allows both SVO and VSO orders and
there does not seem to be a reason (at least on the basis of the
description by CCoowweellll 11996644: 407, 411) to consider one of them
dominant. However, only these two orders are common and the
order of verb and object is relatively inflexible.
A third subtype of language lacking a dominant order consists
of languages in which different word orders occur but the choice
is syntactically determined. For example, in GGeerrmmaann and DDuuttcchh,
the dominant order is SVO in main clauses lacking an auxiliary
and SOV in subordinate clauses and clauses containing an
auxiliary (see below for examples). Because this results in both
orders being common, neither order is considered dominant here
and these two languages are shown on the map as lacking adominant word order. In general, if the word order varies
according to whether there is an auxiliary verb, the language is
shown on the map as lacking a dominant order. Another
language whose word order depends both on whether there is an
auxiliary and whether the clause is a main clause is DDiinnkkaa
(NNiilloottiicc; SSuuddaann): like GGeerrmmaann, the order is SVO in main clauses
without an auxiliary, SAuxOV in main clauses with an auxiliary,
but it is VSO in subordinate clauses without an auxiliary andAuxSOV in subordinate clauses with an auxiliary (NNeebbeell 11994488: 9,
25, 42, 75, 82).
Where languages differ in their order between main clauses and
subordinate clauses, the order in main clauses is used to classify
them on this map. For example, QQuuiilleeuuttee (CChhiimmaakkuuaann;
Washington State) is VSO in main clauses and SVO in subordinate
clauses (AAnnddrraaddee 11993333: 278), and is shown on the map as VSO.
In some languages, word order is more fixed in subordinate
clauses. For example, in MMiiyyaa (Chadic; NNiiggeerriiaa), while both SVO
and VOS are found in main clauses, only VOS order is found in
adverbial subordinate clauses and relative clauses (SScchhuuhh 11999988:
281, 291); because both SVO and VOS are common in main
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
7/13
clauses, MMiiyyaa is shown on the map as lacking a dominant order.
22.. GGeeooggrraapphhiiccaall ddiissttrriibbuuttiioonn ooff tthheeddoommiinnaanntt--oorrddeerr ttyyppeess
The most frequent of the six orders is SOV and it is widelydistributed across the globe. Perhaps the most striking region in
which SOV predominates is an area covering most of Asia, except
in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. It is also overwhelmingly
the dominant order in New Guinea, most of the exceptions being
along the north coast. It is the most common order among
languages in Australia which have a dominant order at all,
although even in languages in which SOV is dominant, the order
is generally flexible. It is clearly the dominant order in NorthAmerica outside of the Pacific Northwest and Mesoamerica.
The map shows three areas where SVO order predominates: (i)
an area covering much of sub-Saharan Africa, though with a
scattering of SOV and VSO languages; (ii) an area extending from
China and southeast Asia south into the AAuussttrroonneessiiaann languages
of Indonesia and the western Pacific; and (iii) Europe and around
the Mediterranean. SVO order is not common outside theseareas.
VSO order is scattered around various parts of the world, in
eastern Africa (among various Eastern Sudanic languages), in
North Africa (BBeerrbbeerr), in the western extremes of Europe (CCeellttiicc),
in and around the Philippines, among Polynesian languages of the
Pacific, in Mesoamerica, and in the Pacific Northwest. VOS order
is also scattered around the globe, though there are no attested
instances on the mainland of Africa or Eurasia.
There are nine OVS languages on the map, six of which are
spoken in South America, five in the Amazon basin, and one
(SSeellkknnaamm) in Tierra del Fuego. There are only four OSV
languages shown: WWaarraaoo in VVeenneezzuueellaa, NNaaddbb in BBrraazziill, WWiikk
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
8/13
NNggaatthhaannaa in northeastern AAuussttrraalliiaa, and TToobbaattii in West Papua,
IInnddoonneessiiaa. Languages without a dominant order are especially
common in North America and Australia, and to a lesser extent in
South America. The scattering of this type partly reflects the fact
that this is not a homogeneous type, since it mixes languages
with highly flexible order with languages which have more rigid
order but where there are two dominant orders. The former type,
languages with highly flexible order, is most common in North
America and Australia and relatively uncommon in Africa, Europe,
Asia, New Guinea and among AAuussttrroonneessiiaann languages.
The map in figure 1 shows the distribution of word order in
various languages of the past, though the times at which these
languages were spoken vary from 4500 years ago to 1000 yearsago. The map illustrates the fact that SVO, now a common order
in Europe and around the Mediterranean, was less common in the
past: on the one hand, there were SOV languages like Latin and
Etruscan in western Europe; on the other hand, there were many
VSO languages in what is now the Middle East, represented both
by SSeemmiittiicc languages and by Egyptian.
FFiigguurree 11: Order of Subject, Object, and Verb in Ancient
Languages
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
9/13
33.. LLaanngguuaaggeess wwiitthh ttwwoo pprriimmaarryy aalltteerrnnaattiinnggoorrddeerrss
Map 8811BB shows languages where it is not possible to identify a
single dominant order but in which it is possible to identify two
orders, neither of which is dominant relative to the other, but
which can be said to be dominant relative to other orders.
VVaalluueess ooff MMaapp 8811BB.. Languages with two dominant orders of
subject, object, and verb
SOV or SVO 29
VSO or VOS 14
SVO or VSO 13
SVO or VOS 8
SOV or OVS 3
total: 67
show map
Type 1 represents languages which are SOV/SVO, i.e. languages
in which the orders SOV and SVO are common relative to other
orders, but where neither order is dominant relative to the other.
An example of a language of this type is GGeerrmmaann, as illustrated
in (4).
(4) GGeerrmmaann
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
10/13
a. Der Lehrer trink-t das Wasser.
DEF teacher drink-3SG DEF water
The teacher is drinking the water.
b. Der Lehrer ha-t das Wasser getrunken.
DEF teacher have-3SG DEF water drink:PAST.PTCPL
The teacher has drunk the water.
Note that at the level of grammar, GGeerrmmaann is simply
verb-second, placing the inflected verb second, and when the
inflected verb is an auxiliary verb, the main verb occurs at the
end of the clause. Thus when the inflected verb is the main verb,
it is possible to get OVS order, or VSO order if an adverb orprepositional phrase precedes the verb, but SVO is apparently
more common than these. Type 1 is the most common of the
types on this map; this most likely is related to the fact that SOV
and SVO are by far the two most common types among the six
possible orders of subject, object, and verb on Map 8811AA.
Type 2 represents languages which are SVO/VSO. The fact that
there are half as many languages of this type compared toSOV/SVO languages while there are more than five times as many
SOV as VSO languages means that the ratio of SVO/VSO to VSO is
higher than the ratio of SOV/SVO to SOV. In other words, the
frequency of Type 2 is greater than we might expect. The high
number of Type 2 languages relates to Universal 6 of GGrreeeennbbeerrgg
((11996633)): All languages with dominant VSO order have SVO as an
alternative or as the only alternative basic order. Although there
may be exceptions to Greenberg's universal, the fact that VSOlanguages generally allow SVO as an alternate word order makes
it unsurprising that we would find many SVO/VSO languages. A
number of the Type 2 languages occur in genealogical groups
that also contain VSO languages, such as BBeerrbbeerr, SSeemmiittiicc, and
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
0 of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
11/13
various subgroups ofAAuussttrroonneessiiaann.
Type 3 languages represent languages which are VSO/VOS. This
is the second-most frequent type on Map 8811BB and given the fact
that neither of the two types it is based on are among the two
more frequent orders SOV and SVO, this type is considerablymore frequent than one might otherwise expect.
Type 4 represents languages which are SVO/VOS, analogous to
Type 2, except with VOS instead of VSO. Their high frequency
despite the relative rarity of VOS languages is presumably
analogous to the factors discussed above with respect to Type 2.
Type 5 represents languages which are SOV/OVS. The three
languages in the sample of this type are WWiicchhiittaa (CCaaddddooaann;Oklahoma), AAppaallaa (CCaarriibbaann; BBrraazziill), and MMaaccuusshhii
DDeetteerrmmiinniinngg DDoommiinnaanntt WWoorrdd OOrrddeerr. Note that a number of
OVS languages are fairly rigidly OV, but allow SOV as a not
infrequent alternate order, so that in some cases there may be a
question as to whether a language should be classified as OVS or
SOV/OVS.
Some languages are described as being verb-final with the
order of subject and object pragmatically determined, suggestingthat they are of a type SOV/OSV not shown on this map, such as
AAnnaammuuxxrraa (MMaaddaanngg; PPaappuuaa NNeeww GGuuiinneeaa) (IInnggrraamm 22000011) and
MMeekkeeoo (OOcceeaanniicc; PPaappuuaa NNeeww GGuuiinneeaa) (JJoonneess 11999988aa). While
there may be some languages of this type, it has been my
experience that when one counts the frequency of SOV and OSV
order in texts for languages which are so described, SOV usually
outnumbers OSV order by well over 2 to 1, and thus the
language counts as SOV by the criteria assumed in this chapter(see DDeetteerrmmiinniinngg DDoommiinnaanntt WWoorrdd OOrrddeerr). In the absence of
such text counts, such languages are shown on Maps 8822AA and
8833AA as SV and OV, but are not shown on this map, it being
considered unknown whether they are SOV or SOV/OSV. I have
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
1 of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
12/13
yet to find a language where text counts show SOV and OSV
occurring with comparable frequency and hence I have yet to find
a language that I would classify as SOV/OSV.
Among the languages shown on Map 8811BB, there are some
languages where the alternation between the two orders isapparently pragmatically governed while there are others where it
is grammatically governed. GGeerrmmaann is a clear example of the
latter sort. In fact, the languages where the alternation is
grammatically governed are generally of Type 1. A number of
languages (NNuueerr (EEtthhiiooppiiaa and SSuuddaann), DDiinnkkaa (SSuuddaann) both
NNiilloottiicc languages, and NNggiittii (LLeenndduu; DDeemmooccrraattiicc RReeppuubblliicc ooff
CCoonnggoo)) employ the SOV order when there is an auxiliary,
although in NNuueerr the auxiliary element is nonverbal. TheMMoorruu--MMaa''ddii languages (represented here by MMoorruu (SSuuddaann),
AAvvookkaayyaa (DDeemmooccrraattiicc RReeppuubblliicc ooff CCoonnggoo and SSuuddaann), LLooggoottii
(DDeemmooccrraattiicc RReeppuubblliicc ooff CCoonnggoo), LLuuggbbaarraa (DDeemmooccrraattiicc
RReeppuubblliicc ooff CCoonnggoo and UUggaannddaa), and MMaa''ddii (SSuuddaann and
UUggaannddaa)) have two constructions, a perfective/past construction
and an imperfective/nonpast one, the former being SVO, the
latter SOV, and when an auxiliary is employed in the SOV
construction, the order is SAuxOV.
44.. TThheeoorreettiiccaall ddiissccuussssiioonn
While the feature shown on this map is perhaps the single most
frequently cited typological feature of languages, it is now
recognized that it represents a clause type that does not occur
especially frequently in spoken language; it is more common that
at least one of the two arguments of a transitive clause will bepronominal, and in many languages pronominal subjects are
expressed by verbal affixes. It is argued by DDrryyeerr ((11999977)) that a
more useful typology is one based on two more basic features,
whether the language is OV or VO and whether it is SV or VS;
these are shown on the next two maps, in Chapters 8822 and 8833.
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
2 of 13 3/14/13 12:45
7/28/2019 Subject Object Verb Order - Language Studies
13/13
In addition, as noted above, the order in transitive clauses is not
always the same as the order in intransitive clauses. The feature
shown on this map is also important in that many other features
are predictable from it, at least statistically. Most of these
features correlate more specifically with the order of object and
verb (GGrreeeennbbeerrgg 11996633, DDrryyeerr 11999922; see Chapters 9955, 9966, and
9977). For a few features, SVO languages exhibit properties
intermediate between those of SOV languages and those of
verb-initial languages, though in general they are more similar to
verb-initial languages (DDrryyeerr 11999911).
ReferencesAndrade 19331.
Brown 20012.Cowell 19643.
Derbyshire 19794.
Dillon and Crinin 19615.
Dryer 19916.
Dryer 19927.
Dryer 19978.
Greenberg 19639.
Heath 198410.
Ingram 200111.
Jones 1998a12.
Kuno 197313.
Li and Thompson 198114.
Nebel 194815.
Schachter 197616.
Schuh 199817.
Weir 199418.
WALS - Chapter 81: Order of Subject, Object and Verb http://wals.info/chapt
3 of 13 3/14/13 12:45