Number of acute diarrhea cases in 2002 compare with median 5 years (1997-2001), Akat-Umnuay District, Sakonnakorn
97
180
9680
122
161
48
23
61
45
70
35
78
14 18 18 17
66
0
50
100
150
200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Mov Dec
Source : Akat-Umnuay Health Office, Sakonnakorn
Median 5 yrs
2002
Evaluation
Systematic investigation of the merit
(quality), worth (cost-effectiveness), or
significant (importance) of an object
Questions to be answered?Questions to be answered?
• What will be evaluated?
• What aspects of the program will be considered?
• What standard must be reached for considered successful program?
Questions to be answered?Questions to be answered?
• What evidence will be used to indicate how the program has performed?
• What conclusion regarding program performance are justified?
• How will the lessons learned from the inquiry be used to improve public health effectiveness?
Program evaluation
Input Process Output
ManMoneyManagement(Context)
Detail stepof working
Outcome Effect Impact
Framework for program evaluation in public health
Engage Stakeholders
Describe the program
Focus the evaluation
design
Gather credibleevidence
Justifyconclusions
Ensure useand share
lessons learned
Purpose of evaluating public health surveillance system
To ensure that problems of public
health importance are being monitored
efficientlyefficiently and effectivelyeffectively
Engage the stakeholders in the evaluation
• Those involved in program operations
• Those served or effected by the program
• Primary user of the evaluation
Describe the surveillance system to be evaluated
• Describe the public health importance of the disease (or health-related event) under surveillance
• Describe the purpose and operation of the system
• Describe the resources used to operate the system
A. Public health importance
• Disease frequency (number of cases/death, incidence, prevalence, mortality rate)
• Severity (case-fatality ratio, hospitalization rate, disability rate)
• Preventability
• Public interest
B. Purpose and operation of the surveillance system (1)
• List the purpose and objectives of the system
• Describe the planned uses of the data from the system
• Describe the disease under surveillance, including case definition
• Cite any legal authority for the data collection
B. Purpose and operation of the surveillance system (2)
• Where in the organization the system resides
• Level of integration with other systems
• Flow chart
• Component of the system– Population under surveillance– Period of time of data collection– Collected what data and how– …
C. Resources used to operate the surveillance system
• Funding source• Personnel • Other resources
– Travel– Training– Supplies– Computer and other equipment– Related services (e.g., mail, telephone, internet,
laboratory support, hardware & software maintenance)
Focus the evaluation design
• Determining the specific purpose of the evaluation
• Identifying stakeholders
• Considering what will be done with the result
• Determining standards for assessing the performance of the system
Gathering credible evidence
• Usefulness
• System attribute– Simplicity - Sensitivity– Flexibility - Predictive value positive– Data quality - Representativeness– Acceptability - Timeliness– Stability
About public health surveillance
• Surveillance for action!!!• How?
– Early detection of abnormal event – Estimated magnitude of morbidity & mortality– Detect trend– Permit assessment of preventive & control
measures– Stimulate research intended to lead to
prevention and control
Usefulness Usefulness
• Describing the “actions taken”as a result of the data from the surveillance system
• Should begin with review objectives of the system and assess whether the utilization of the system meet the objectives
Sensitivity Sensitivity
Can be considered at 2 levels
• Proportion of cases detect by the surveillance system
• Ability to detect outbreak,
Comparing data from surveillance system with the real situation
Surveillancesystem
Case
Non-case
Non-case Case
A B
C D
Real situation
Sensitivity = AA+C
Sensitivity of suspected avian influenza reported in Nakonnayok province by district,
2005
80.0%
50.0%
76.9% 76.9%
0.0%0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
เมือง บานนา องครักษ มศว ปากพลี
โรงพยาบาล
รอยละ
Predictive value positive (PVP)Predictive value positive (PVP)
• Proportion of reported cases of Disease A that really be the Disease A
• PVP provide different perspectives to tell how well the system is functioned
Comparing data from surveillance system with the real situation
Surveillancesystem
Case
Non-case
Non-case Case
A B
C D
Real situation
PVP = AA+B
Predictive value positive of suspected avian influenza cases
Suspected AI cases reported to central level
Met case definition 87
Not met case definition 8
Total 95
PVP of suspected Avian influenza cases= 87/95 = 91.58%
RepresentativenessRepresentativeness
• Represent disease occurrence over time and distribution
• These characteristic generally related to time, place, person
Timeliness Timeliness
• Reflect speed between steps in a public health surveillance system
• Should be evaluated in terms of availability of information to control the disease
Simplicity Simplicity
• Refer to both its structure and ease of operation
• Surveillance system should be as simple as possible while still meeting their objectives
Flexibility Flexibility
A flexible public health surveillance
system can adapt to changing
information needs on operating
conditions with little additional time, personnel or allocated funds.
Data quality Data quality
Reflect completeness and validity
of the data from public health surveillance
Acceptability Acceptability
Willingness of persons and
organizations to participate in the surveillance system
Stability Stability
Refer to reliability (ability to collect,
manage, and provide data properly without
failure) and availability (ability to be
operational when needed) of the public
health surveillance system
Example of different surveillance Example of different surveillance evaluationevaluation
• Main surveillance system
• HIV/AIDS surveillance system
• EWARS