SWPRD Report-Draft 080912

8/14/2019 SWPRD Report-Draft 080912

1/43

C o m m u n i t y i n s p i r e d A r C h i t e C t u r e

pa F:

South Whidbey Parks and Recreation

5495 Maxwelton RoadLangley, WA 98260

pa B:

ORB Architects, Inc.

607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210

Renton, Washington 98057

south WhidBey pArKs & reCreAtion distriCt

AQuAtiC FeAsiBiLity study

2008 ANALYSIS


2/43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 2 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

SECTION 3 AREA OF MAGNITUDE OPERATING PRO-FORMA

SECTION 4 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

SECTION 5 CONCEPT PLAN


3/43

SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


4/43


5/43

SWPRD Recreation and Aquatic Center Feasibility Study 9/12/2008

ORB Architects, Inc. Page 1-2

607 SW Grady Way, Suite 210, Renton, WA 98057

From Concept to Consensus

Given the demographics of the district and the latest trends in aquatic facilities, the SWPRD has actively pursuedthe effort to study the regional aquatic facility demand. This included analyzing the best and most appropriatesite, the program scope, and the costs to build and operate the facility.

ORB worked closely with a Work Team that was established for this project. The Work Team comprised of theParks Commissioners as well as representatives from Senior Services, local swim teams and other interestedcommunity members. The work teams goal has been to move from the 2007 general concept presented in theMaster Plan to an emerging consensus among the public in the SWPRD.

Proposed SWPRD Recreational and Aquatic Center

The 2007 SWPRD Master Plan concluded that residents considered a swimming pool/aquatic center asimportant and that it received the highest number of first choice votes for a park facility that they considerimportant to their household. The recommendation for a new building includes three (3) primary use areas;Community & Senior Services, Active Recreation, and Aquatics. ORB evaluated the program further and forreasons of optimizing the operating pro-forma, recommends the following program:

Community & Senior Services

o Lobby, Control Desk, Concessionso Staff Officeso Multi-Purpose Rooms

Community Meetings

Classroom / Arts & Crafts

Party Room

Dining

o Kitchen (catering use)Active Recreation

o Fitnesso Dance / Aerobic / Yoga / Martial Artso Climbing Wallo Court (outdoor)

Aquatic Program Elements

o Family Leisure PoolZero-Depth entry

2 Lap Lanes

Interactive Spray Features

Lazy River floating channel

Water Slide

o Competition Pool (outdoorindoor if budget allows)American Short Course 25 meter

o Spa / Swirlpoolo Mens, Womens and Family Changing Roomso Outdoor Patio Area

Additional Facility Features

o Expansion Capability- enclose outdoor useso Surface Parking with a drop-off area


6/43




Scope of Work

The ORB Architects scope of work is as follows:Collecting and Analyzing Existing Information

2007 SWPRD Community Park and Sport Complex Master Plan

Prepare a Preliminary Site Analysis

Host Community Meetings

ORB Architects hosted (2) community meetings and several Work Group Meetings that were used to

presenting the status of the project and latest facility trends. These were a valuable means of gatheringpublic input and gaining consensus on the proposed options identified in this report.

Develop Concept Design Drawings

Prepare a Market Assessment

Prepare a Financial Analysis and Area of Magnitude Operating Pro-Forma

Prepare Area of Magnitude Project Construction Cost Estimate


7/43

SECTION 2 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION


8/43




Community Participation

A project of this nature requires the communitys involvement in and commitment to the planning anddevelopment. Sixty-three percent of the respondents to the Recreational Needs Assessment are in favor of acommunity Recreation and Aquatic Facility. By continuing with the community outreach, the goal of this scopehas been to maintain that support and gain additional backing from the community. ORB Architects and the Parks& Recreation Commissioners have welcomed being able to interact with all the stakeholders and listen to theirconcerns and interests.

In order to assist the South Whidbey Parks & Recreation District in gaining public consensus for a bond measure,ORB prepared materials such as presentation boards and posters to help the community understand the scopeand potential of the project, including presenting the latest recreation and aquatic trends. This material was usedin a series of public presentations, in order to convey the vision of the project, anticipated operating expense andrevenue data, and any other materials that would be beneficial in eliciting a constructive response from thecommunity.

Work Team

In order to meet the fast-track schedule and gather enough information from research and community input, ORB

recommended to the South Whidbey Parks and Recreation District that a Project Work Team be established earlyon. This work team was charged with setting meeting dates, contacting community members, advertising publicmeetings and most importantly making key decisions in a timely manner.

The work team comprised of the Parks Commissioners, the Parks Director, Representatives from Senior Servicesand Masters Swim members. ORB met with this group on a regular basis before and after the public meetings.These meetings help quickly establish the goals for the public meetings and were an opportunity for all therepresentatives to share thoughts on the input that was received throughout the process. As is true with mostpublic facilities of this type, compromises have to be made in order reach the broad, overarching goals. The workteam for this project was able to keep the big picture in view, while considering the specific desires of some aswell as bearing in mind the costs for building and operating the facility.


9/43


10/43




Following the charrette work period, each group was asked to have a representative present their design optionsand how they planned on achieving them within the budget. This process proved to be meaningful in gaining

knowledge about the communities preconceptions as well as their priorities. Of the ten (10) groups that workedon the charrette analysis, only one or two stayed under the budget. Every other group presented trade-off ideasthat help them get down to the $10 million.

The number of groups and the diversity of the crowd resulted in an expression of several different solutions thatranged from completely aquatic to primarily multi-purpose and activity spaces. Some of the key points that weremade by the community members during the discussion period are as follows:

The School District is shrinking in attendance and therefore is considering consolidating some of itsspaces. This may provide the community with classrooms, arts & craft spaces and meeting spaces in thearea without the need to invest in new construction.

There are several private and semi-private court spaces in the community that offer a space for basketballand other related activities. While it seems that most people can gain access to one or more of theseplaces, they may not offer ideal usage times and can conflict with other programs

There are several private pools in neighborhoods of the district that residents have access to. In additionthe Island Athletic Club offers a large fitness area and an indoor pool just 15 minutes by car from the site.

The following are a sample of the written responses:

A top priority that the Community Recreation and Aquatics Center must have is a pool that will havemultiple purposes for generational use.

A consideration for the choices made is cost what can get funded? A consideration for the choices made is that other community facilities are available for other items, such

as senior center for crafts.

The most compelling reason to support this facility is that we need a community pool that is available to all.

Community (school) has quite a few gyms.The following pages are the summary of results from the programming charrette.


11/43




Water slide

5%

Swirl pool/hot tub

8%

Sauna/steam room

3%

Warm water therapy

1%

Climbing wall

6%

Aerobics

4%

Senior services

6%

Multi purpose room

10%

Kitchen

9%

Leisure pool

14%

Dining room

1%

Party room

4%

Arts & craft room

1%

After school/games

3%

Lap pool

12%

Day care

1%

Concession

2%

Fitness center

3% Gymnasium

6%

Leisure pool Lap pool Water slide Swirl pool/hot tub Sauna/steam room

Warm water therapy Climbing wall Gymnasium Fitness center Aerobics

Senior services Multi purpose room Kitchen Concession Arts & craft room

Party room After school/games Dining room Day care


12/43




ACTIVE RECREATION

Climbing wall

29%

Gymnasium

33%

Fitness center

15%

Aerobics

23%

Climbing wall Gymnasium Fitness center Aerobics


13/43




COMMUNITY/SENIOR SERVICES

Senior services

14%

Multi purpose room

25%

Kitchen

23%

Concession

6%

Arts & craft room

4%

Party room

12%

After school/games

8%

Dining room

4%

Day care

4%

Senior services Multi purpose room Kitchen Concession Arts & craft room

Party room After school/games Dining room Day care


14/43




AQUATICS

Leisure pool

32%

Lap pool

28%

Water slide

11%

Swirl pool/hot tub

19%

Sauna/steam room

8%

Warm water therapy

2%

Leisure pool Lap pool Water slide Swirl pool/hot tub Sauna/steam room Warm water therapy


15/43


16/43




Community Meeting #2 Concept Design Presentation

On July 17, 2008 the SWPRD and ORB Architect hosted a second public meeting at the Langley United Methodist

Church, near downtown Langley. Many of the same citizens that attended the first meeting were in attendance.The large room had tables and chairs for people to sit and a presentation table with easels presenting the resultsfrom the Program Charrette and the Initial Concept Design Proposal.

The objective of this meeting was to report back on the issues brought up at the first meeting and discuss how weresponded to them in a concept for the future Community Recreation and Aquatic Facility. Due to thecompromising nature of this process, it is expected that not everyone will be 100% satisfied with the solutionproposed, however everyone should feel as thought they have been appropriately listened to.

The meeting was heavily dominated by the swim clubs and advocates for the aquatic features, particularly the lappool. Virtually no comments were received on either the Community & Senior Services or the Active Recreationspaces. The primary comment given for the proposed plan was regarding whether or not the Lap Pool could beenclosed. Related to that comment was the desire to try and have the two pools adjacent to each other and toassure that, if the pool were to remain outdoors, it would be in the sun.

Based on this additional feedback, ORB modified the plan layout slightly, but feels strongly that the programmingelements for the facility meet the overall goals for the project within the stipulated budget. Should budget allow, it

is clear that the first priority will be to enclose the Lap Pool by extending the roof of the Leisure Pool.


17/43

SECTION 3 AREA OF MAGNITUDE OPERATING PRO-FORMA


18/43


19/43


20/43




The projected total revenue is $323,309 in 2011, increasing by 2015 to $352,828, and further growing to$397,649.

Cost of goods sold includes 50% of concession revenue, and an assumption that lessons will be offered bycontract instructors that will be paid 50% of the collected income. Combined they total 18.65% of total revenue.The resulting gross profit shown in the table is $263,631 in 2011, $287,264 in 2015 and $323,148 in 2020.

Operating expenses (direct) are also shown in Table 3. They have been projected for six (6) categories: payrolland benefits, maintenance and repairs, chemicals and supplies, utilities, other, and contingency. Because thesenumbers are also stated in constant 2008 dollars, the only amounts that are increased are those that will likely beimpacted by the annual number of people visiting the aquatic center. Factors that could change this assumption

would be size of building, water area square footage, payroll rates, and number of employees/annual hoursworked.

The payroll estimates have been determined from a staffing schedule presented in Table 5. The total payroll andbenefit cost is projected at $266,442 in 2011 (2008 dollars). The cost has been increased somewhatproportionate to revenue, accounting for additional help that may be needed as the number of users grows.

Maintenance and repairs have been projected at $2.00 per square foot of water surface area. They apply to coststhat would be incurred for the entire building, however. The same holistic approach applies to chemicals and

supplies (@ $3/sf of water surface area), and utilities (@ $15/sf of water surface area). The Othercost is anallowance, at $18,000 annually. To the subtotal of these expenses has been applied a 10% contingency.

Total operating expenses are projected at $418,486 in 2011, $431,299 in 2015, and $437,800 in 2020.

The projected net operating loss is $154,856 in 2011, gradually decreasing to $143,936 in 2015 and $114,652 by2020. These represent cost recovery rates of 63%, 67% and 74%, respectively. Comparative net operatingloss/income numbers for the low and high ends of the area of magnitude range are shown below:

2011 2015 2020

Low ($170,342) ($158,330) ($126,117)

High ($123,885) ($115,149) ($91,722)


21/43




Tax Implications

In 2007, the assessed value of those properties within the taxing boundaries of the South Whidbey Parks andRecreation District was $3,815,543,741. The Districts regular levy tax rate was $0.11356982. The rate for votedbonds was $0.0311566. The assessed value in 2008 increased by slightly under 11%, to $4,227,648,969. Thetax rates decreased to $0.10134944 (regular levy), and $0.02573490 (bond levy). According to the County

Assessors Office, the District has no banked capacity available. There is timber valuation of $6,697,166 in theDistrict. It is not known whether or not this has been used to offset any bonded indebtedness impact.

Table 6 presents annual debt service estimates, and property tax rates, assuming a $15 million general obligationbond issue. The variables are 4% and 5% interest, and 20-year, 25-year, and 30-year repayment terms. The

impact of the resulting tax rate, using the 2008 assessed valuation for South Whidbey Parks and RecreationDistrict, on a $250,000 single family residence is shown.

The regular levy impact would depend on a number of factors. The current budget covered by the regular levy is$452,836. This net operating income (loss) for the aquatic center could add $123,885 - $170,342 in 2011 (2008dollars), and $91,722 - $126,117 in 2020 (2008 dollars).


22/43




TABLE 1

Selected Municipal Indoor Aquatic Centres(ers) With

Leisure Pool Elements Located In British Columbia,

Washington, Oregon and Utah 2006 Swimmer-Days, 2007 (rounded to 1,000)City Public Per Capita

Facility Name/British Columbia City Population Admissions Lessons Clubs/Events Total Swimmer-Days

Beban Park Pool Nanaimo 79,000 122,000 43,000 24,000 189,000 2.4

Nanaimo Aquatic Centre Nanaimo 79,000 365,000 14,000 8,000 387,000 4.9

Combined - Nanaimo Pools Nanaimo 79,000 487,000 57,000 32,000 576,000 7.3

Ladner Leisure Centre Delta 97,000

City Centre Aquatic Centre Coquitlam 115,000

Crystal Pool and Fitness Center Victoria 78,000

Gordon Head Recreation Centre Victoria 78,000

Saanich Commonwealth Place Victoria 78,000

Combined - Victoria Pools Victoria 78,000Eileen Dailly Leisure Pool/Fitness Center Burnaby 203,000

Greater Vernon Parks and Recreation District Vernon 36,000

Maple Ridge Leisure Centre Maple Ridge 69,000

North Peace Leisure Pool Fort St. John 17,000

Powell River Recreation Complex Powell River 13,000

Watermania Richmond 174,000

2007 Swimmer-Days, 2006 (rounded to 1,000)

City Public Per Capita

Facility Name/Washington, Oregon and Utah City Population Admissions Lessons Clubs/Events Total Swimmer-Days

McMinnville Aquatic Center McMinnville, OR 31,000 61,000 44,000 4,000 109,000 3.5

North Clackamas Aquatic Center Milwaukie, OR 21,000 130,000 51,000 27,000 208,000 9.9

Southwest Community Center Pool Portland, OR 50,000 [1] 104,000 31,000 2,000 137,000 2.7

Firstenburg Community Center Pool Vancouver, WA 50,000 [1] 120,000 20,000 0 140,000 2.8

Osborn Aquatic Center Corvalis, OR 51,000 90,000 91,000 12,000 193,000 3.8

Pratt Aquatic Center Tooele, UT [2] 30,000 73,000 19,000 22,000 114,000 3.8

_________________________________________________________

[1] Service area population only

[2] Swimmer-days are for 2007

Sources: City of Nanaimo, City of Tooele, British Columbia Parks and Recreation Association, 2007 Aquatic Survey,ORB Architects, and Warren Cooley/EDCON


23/43




TABLE 2

Projected Swimmer-Days at

Proposed SWPRD Aquatic Center

(2011-2020)

Population - Year Around [1] 2000 2008 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2020

Whidbey Island

South Whidbey 12,662 13,790 14,291 14,465 14,639 14,879 15,098 15,537 16,103

Central Whidbey 10,812 11,500 12,205 12,802 13,590 14,600 14,815 16,450 19,290

Subtotal - South

and Central 23,474 25,290 26,496 27,267 28,229 29,479 29,913 31,987 35,393

North Whidbey 34,737 38,530 40,892 42,894 45,535 48,920 49,639 55,117 64,362

Total 58,211 63,820 67,388 70,161 73,764 78,399 79,552 87,104 99,755

Camano Island 13,347 14,735 15,638 16,403 17,413 18,707 18,982 21,077 24,612

Grand Total71,558 78,555 83,026 86,564 91,177 97,106 98,534 108,181 124,367

Population - Summer

Whidbey IslandSouth Whidbey [2] 14,561 15,859 16,435 16,635 16,835 17,111 17,362 17,868 18,518

Central Whidbey [2] 12,434 13,225 14,036 14,722 15,629 16,790 17,037 18,918 22,184

Subtotal - South

and Central 26,995 29,084 30,470 31,357 32,463 33,901 34,399 36,785 40,702

North Whidbey [3] 38,211 42,383 44,981 47,183 50,089 53,812 54,603 60,629 70,798

Total 65,206 71,467 75,452 78,540 82,552 87,713 89,002 97,414 111,500

Camano Island [3] 14,682 16,209 17,202 18,043 19,154 20,578 20,880 23,185 27,073

Grand Total 79,888 87,675 92,653 96,584 101,706 108,291 109,882 120,598 138,573

____________________________________________

[1] Projections from 2008 through 2020 have been computed at average annual rate of 1.2%.

[2] Year around population plus 15%.


[4] Assumes that 50% of annual swimmer-days will be generated in the summer months.

Sources: www.citypopulation.de/USA, Island County Economic Development Council, Island County Community Web Warren Cooley/EDCON


24/43




TABLE 2 - Continued

Projected Swimmer-Days at

Proposed SWPRD Aquatic Center

(2011-2020)

Projected Swimmer-Days

at Proposed SWPRD

Aquatic Center []4]

Non-Summer Months

South Whidbey (1.75/capita) N/A N/A 25,009 25,314 25,618 26,038 26,422 27,190 28,180

Central Whidbey (0.75/capita) N/A N/A 9,154 9,602 10,193 10,950 11,111 12,338 14,468

North Whidbey and

Camano Island (no projection) N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 34,163 34,915 35,811 36,988 37,532 39,527 42,648

Summer Months

South Whidbey (1.75/capita) N/A N/A 28,761 29,111 29,461 29,944 30,384 31,268 32,407Central Whidbey (0.75/capita) N/A N/A 10,527 11,042 11,721 12,593 12,778 14,188 16,638

North Whidbey and

Camano Island (no participation) N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal 39,287 40,153 41,182 42,536 43,162 45,456 49,045

Annual Total

South Whidbey N/A N/A 53,770 54,425 55,079 55,982 56,806 58,458 60,588

Central Whidbey N/A N/A 19,681 20,643 21,914 23,543 23,889 26,526 31,105

North Whidbey and

Camano Island N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 73,450 75,068 76,993 79,525 80,694 84,984 91,693

Swimmer-Days:South Whidbey

Year Around Population Ratio N/A N/A 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.5 5.7

____________________________________________

[1] Projections from 2008 through 2020 have been computed at average annual rate of 1.2%.



[4] Assumes that 50% of annual swimmer-days will be generated in the summer months.

Sources: www.citypopulation.de/USA, Island County Economic Development Council, Island County Community Web Warren Cooley/EDCON


25/43




TABLE 3

Pro Forma Operating Statetment

for SWPRD Aquatic Center

(2011-2020)

Projected Swimmer-Days at Proposed SWPRD

Aquatic Center 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2020

Total Swimmer-Days 73,450 75,068 76,993 79,525 80,694 84,984 91,693

Distribution of Total Swimmer-Days

Public Admissions (@ 70%) 51,415 52,548 53,895 55,668 56,486 59,489 64,185Lessons (@ 25%) 18,363 18,767 19,248 19,881 20,174 21,246 22,923

Clubs/Events/Schools (@ 5%) 3,673 3,753 3,850 3,976 4,035 4,249 4,585

Total 73,450 75,068 76,993 79,525 80,694 84,984 91,693

Revenue

Admissions (@ $3.50/public admission) 179,953 183,917 188,633 194,836 197,700 208,211 224,648

Lessons (@ $3.50/participant) 64,269 65,685 67,369 69,584 70,607 74,361 80,231

Rental (allowance) 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000

Concessions (@ $0.75/total swimmer-day) 55,088 56,301 57,745 59,644 60,521 63,738 68,770

Total 323,309 329,902 337,746 348,064 352,828 370,310 397,649

Cost of Goods Sold

Concessions (@ 50% of related revenue) 27,544 28,151 28,872 29,822 30,260 31,869 34,385

Lessons (@ 50% of related revenue) 32,134 32,842 33,684 34,792 35,304 37,181 40,116

Total59,678 60,993 62,557 64,614 65,564 69,050 74,501

Gross Profit 263,631 268,909 275,190 283,450 287,264 301,260 323,148

Expenses

Payroll and Benefits (allowance after 2011) 266,442 269,000 272,000 275,000 278,000 281,000 284,000

Maintenance and Repairs (4,800 sf @ $2/sf) 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600 9,600

Chemicals and Supplies (4,800 sf @ $3/sf) 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400

Utilities (4,800 sf @ $15/sf) 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000

Other (allowance) 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000

Subtotal 380,442 383,000 386,000 389,000 392,000 395,000 398,000

Contingency (10% of subtotal) 38,044 38,300 38,600 38,900 39,200 39,500 39,800

Total 418,486 421,300 424,600 427,900 431,200 434,500 437,800

Net Operating Income (154,856) (152,391) (149,410) (144,450) (143,936) (133,240) (114,652)

Cost Recovery Rate 63% 64% 65% 66% 67% 69% 74%

_________________________________________________

Note: 2008 dollars

Source: Warren Cooley/EDCON


26/43




TABLE 4

Operating Performance of Selected Municipal Indoor Aquatic Centres(ers) With Leisure Pool

Elements Located in British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and Utah

(2006 and 2007)

Southwest FirstenburgNanaimo McMinnville No.Clackamas Community Community Osborn Pratt

Aquatic Center Aquatic Center Aquatic Center Center Pool Center Pool Aquatic Center Aquatic Center

Fee Schedule (2007) (2006) (2006) (2006) (2006) (2006) (2007)

Daily Admissions (in City/District only)

Adults (over 18) 3.00 6.99 5.75 5.75 4.00 2.50Youth (13-18) 2.00 4.99 4.25 3.50 3.50 2.00Children (4-12) 2.00 3.99 3.00 3.50 2.50 1.50Seniors (over 62) 2.50 4.99 4.25 4.50 2.50 1.50

Annual Pass (range)Individual (in City/District only) 112-152 216-240 249-462 DNR 254-356 85-145Family 228 490 672 DNR 713 230

Per Capita Admissions

(admissions revenue/public admissions) 3.05 4.22 2.91 0.89

Operating Performance (Overview)

Revenue

Admissions 1,111,795 DNR 548,122 DNR 262,240 65,196Lessons/Program 167,374 DNR 153,367 DNR 189,442 22,138Rental 78,589 DNR 29,901 DNR 28,015 5,560

Concessions 22,560 DNR 12,020 DNR 5,593 DNROther 140,616 DNR 307,456 DNR 144,937 19,872

Total 1,520,934 302,255 1,050,866 530,000 DNR 630,227 112,676

Expenses

Salaries and Benefits 1,536,176 364,051 693,734 527,912 336,675Utilities 255,000 [1] 90,283 345,695 DNR 146,500Maintenance and Operations 271,928 [1] 201,084 136,281 133,873 66,100Supplies 99,955 0 16,867 2,450 Inc in M & OMiscellaneous Other 316,805 0 121,100 DNR 101,765

Total 2,479,864 655,418 1,313,677 664,235 DNR DNR 651,040

Net Operating Income (958,930) (353,163) (262,811) (134,235) DNR DNR (538,364)

Cost Recovery Rate 61% 46% 80% 80% DNR DNR 17%

____________________________________________Note: DNR means data not reported.

[1] Utilities and facility maintenance and operations are not separated for Nanaimo Aquatic Centre; the combined total forNanaimo and Beban Park Pool was $1,053,856. In the above analysis, 50% was allocated to Nanaimo Aquatic Centre.

Sources: City of Nanaimo, City of Tooele, 2007 Aquatic Facility Survey, ORB Architects, and Warren Cooley/EDCON


27/43




TABLE 5

Payroll and Benefits Estimate for

SWPRD Aquatic Center

(2011)

Full Time Hours Per Pay Scale AnnualEquivalents Year (hourly eqiv.) Payroll

Payroll

Administration

Manager (ft) 1.00 2,080 $24.00 49,920

Administrative Assistant (pt) 1.00 1,040 $12.00 12,480

P

Operations

Maintenance Supervisor (ft) 0.75 1,560 $15.00 17,550

Maintenance Staff (pt) 2.00 1,040 $10.00 20,800

Cashier and Locker Room Supervisor (ft) 0.75 1,560 $15.00 17,550Cashier and Locker Room Staff (pt) 3.00 1,040 $10.00 31,200

Lifeguards and Instructors

Head Lifeguard (ft) 0.75 1,560 $15.00 17,550

Lifeguards (pt) 3.00 1,040 $15.00 46,800

Instructors (contract) NA NA NA

Subtotal 12.25 10,920 NA 213,850

Benefits [1]

Full Time (35% of payroll) 35,900

Part Time (15% of payroll) 16,692

Subtotal NA NA NA 52,592

Total 12.25 10,916 NA 266,442

____________________________________________

Notes:

1. ft means 2080 hours per year (40 hours/week x 52 weeks)

2. 3/4 time means 1560 hours per year (30 hours/week x 52 weeks); still receive full time benefits.

3. pt means 1040 hours per year (20 hours x 52 weeks).

4. NA means not applicable.

5. 2008 constant dollars.

Source: Warren Cooley/EDCON


28/43




TABLE 6

Debt Service and Tax Rate Analysis

for Proposed SWPRD Aquatic Center

(2011)

Estimated Amount of Bond Issue = $15.0 mill ion

2008 Assessed Value of Property in SWPRD

(source: Island County Assessor's Office)

Annual Debt Service 4% Interest 5% Interest20-year Term $1,090,800 $1,188,000

25-Year Term $950,400 $1,053,000

30-Year Term $858,600 $966,000

Tax Rate (based on 2008 assessed valuation)20-Year Term $0.25802 $0.28101

25-Year Term $0.22481 $0.24907

30-Year Term $0.20309 $0.22864

Annual Taxes on $250,000 Residence20-Year Term $64.51 $70.25

25-Year Term $56.20 $62.27

30-Year Term $50.77 $57.16

_______________________________________________________

Note: 2008 dollars.

Sources: Island County Assessor's Office and Warren Cooley/EDCON


29/43

SECTION 4 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE


30/43




Area of Magnitude Cost Estimate

The following pages contain a detailed Area of Magnitude Construction Cost Estimate based on the proposeddesign by ORB Architects. The estimate has been escalated to 2011 dollars as the estimated construction period.

Page 2 of 10

South Whidbey Recreation Center A-E Firm Name:Whidb I l d W hi t ORB A hit t I


31/43

Whidbey Island, Washington ORB Architects, Inc.Estimated By: Checked By: Date:

Project Title RDC GEA 9/10/2008S Whidbey Recreation Center Status Of Design: ORB Job No.Concept Design Concept Design 2825

Description Footprint @ 25,046 sf Quantity Basic Construction Gross Site39,546 Sq Ft Facility W/ Outdoor Features Number Unit Unit Cost Total Sq Ft Cost Const Cost

25,046

Square Foot BuildingSummaryBasic Construction Work Items Building Summary Bldg Sq Ft Cost Sitework SummaryGeneral Contractor Work Subtotals (Includes Outdoor Pool and Basketball Court)Building Costs Subtotal $3,706,734 $148.00Sitework Costs Subtotal (Includes Outdoor Pool and Basketball Court) $2,967,873

Subtotal $3,706,734 $2,967,873GC Markup, Bonds, Insurance, Permits, Mobilization/Demob 20% $741,347 $593,575

Total General Contractor Work $4,448,081 $177.60 $3,561,447

Mechanical Contractor WorkBuilding Costs Subtotal $1,498,232 $59.82Sitework Costs Subtotal (No Work) (No Work)

Subtotal $1,498,232

GC Markup, Bonds, Insurance, Permits, Mobilization/Demob 15% $224,735Total Mechanical Contractor Work $1,722,966 $68.79

Electrical Contractor WorkBuilding Costs Subtotal $545,892 $21.80Sitework Costs Subtotal $155,000

Subtotal $545,892 $155,000GC Markup, Bonds, Insurance, Permits, Mobilization/Demob 15% $81,884 $23,250

Total Electrical Contractor Work $627,775 $25.06 $178,250

Construction Cost Subtotal $6,798,823 $271.45 $3,739,697

Sales Tax 8.3% $564,302 $310,395FF&E Allowance 3.0% $203,965 $0

Concept Design Contingency 10% $756,709 $405,009Escalate to 2011 Construction period 10% $811,983 $445,510

Building Sitework$8,931,818 $356.62 $4,900,611

Per Square Foot,Not Including Sitework

Total Estimated Construct ion Cost $13,832,429Add 12% For Project Costs

$1,659,892 Including Design, Construction Admin& Construction Testing Fees

Total Estimated Project Cost $15,492,321

SWPRD Recreation and Aquatic Center Feasibility Study

ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-2

Page 3 of 10

South Whidbey Recreation Center A-E Firm Name:Whidbey Island Washington ORB Architects Inc


32/43




Building Costs

1. General Contractor WorkNote: Unit Costs Include Subcontractor OH&PA. Excavation & Foundation Prep

Pool Tanks, & Sump Pit Excavation & Backfill 1 ls $55,000.00 $55,000Footing Excavation & Backfill 1,900 lf $12.00 $22,800Subtotal "A" $77,800 $3.11

B. ConcreteFootings 1,900 lf $35.00 $66,500Stem Walls 1,900 lf $36.00 $68,4004" Slab on Grade 334 cy $320.00 $106,741Dry Spaces Vapor Barrier Below Slab 11,600 sf $0.50 $5,800Waterslide Foundations Complete 160 cy $220.00 $35,200

Leisure Pool (4250 sf total) 3,420 sf $65.00 $222,300Add For Parent/Tot Pool 140 sf $90.00 $12,600Add For River Channel 690 sf $180.00 $124,200

Hot Tub 80 sf $360.00 $28,800Sump & Pump Pit Walls 300 lf $150.00 $45,000Subtotal "B" $715,541 $28.57

C. Exterior Wall Systems8" CMU, Reinforced, Solid Grouted 19,445 sf $11.62 $225,951Brick or CMU Veneer 17,825 sf $12.38 $220,6746" Metal Studs @ 16" OC 4,605 sf $6.44 $29,6565/8" GWB or Sheathing 9,210 sf $1.76 $16,210Weather Barrier 4,605 sf $0.25 $1,151

3" Rigid Polyiso Insulation 17,825 sf $2.18 $38,859Unfaced Batt R-21 Insulation 4,605 sf $1.17 $5,3884 Mil Poly Vapor Retarder 4,605 sf $0.20 $921Bituthane Self Stick Vapor Retarder 17,825 sf $3.58 $63,8142" R-10 Perimiter Insulation at Foundation 2,808 sf $2.06 $5,784Sill Flashing 958 sf $5.82 $5,576Masonry Seal Exterior Faces 17,825 sf $0.46 $8,200Epoxy Paint Interior Cmu Faces 19,445 sf $1.63 $31,695Paint GWB Where Exposed 4,605 sf $0.81 $3,730Subtotal "C" $657,607 $26.26


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-3

Page 4 of 10

South Whidbey Recreation Center A-E Firm Name:Whidbey Island Washington ORB Architects Inc


33/43




D. Interior Wall SystemsMasonry Walls, Epoxy Paint Both Sides 8,136 sf $14.50 $117,931Gyp. Board Walls, Texture & Paint Both Sides 9,660 sf $8.68 $83,887Subtotal "D" $201,819 $8.06

E. Structural Frame & Misc MetalsStructural Steel Framework 80 ton $3,000.00 $240,000Open Web Joists 40 ton $2,500.00 $100,0001.5" x 20 ga Metal Deck 25,046 sf $2.50 $62,6153" x 20 ga Composite Floor Deck 2,520 sf $2.80 $7,056Shear Studs 3/4" x 4.75" 360 ea $2.93 $1,053

Anchor Bolts 1" x 1.33' max 416 ea $5.85 $2,434Waterslide & Climbing Tower Roofs 800 sf $9.43 $7,540

Waterslide / Mech Room Stairs 80 riser $185.00 $14,800Other Misc Metal Fabrications 3 ton $5,000 $15,000Subtotal "E" $450,498 $17.99

F. Roof SystemsFlat Roof System 15,946 sf $12.68 $202,116Metal Roof System 9,100 sf $18.85 $171,535Towers Metal Roof System 800 sf $18.85 $15,080Roof Drain & Leader 20 ea $1,500.00 $30,000Subtotal "F" $418,731 $16.72

G. CeilingsPaint Exposed Deck & Structure 14,050 sf $3.25 $45,663

Suspended Acoustical 4,793 sf $3.90 $18,693Suspended Specialty 4,793 sf $7.80 $37,385Solid GWB & Metal Frame 3,930 sf $7.15 $28,100Subtotal "G" $129,840 $5.18

H. DoorsHollow Metal - Single 9 ea $1,016.00 $9,144Hollow Metal - Double 4 ea $1,950.00 $7,800

Aluminum - Single 6 ea $1,975.00 $11,850Aluminum - Double 4 ea $3,950.00 $15,800Folding Walls 300 sf $45.00 $13,500Subtotal "H" $58,094 $2.32

I. WindowsExterior Alum Frame Insul Glazed 2,600 sf $52.00 $135,200Interior Single Glazed 320 sf $38.00 $12,160Towers Alum Framed Windows 1,600 sf $70.00 $112,000Subtotal "I" $259,360 $10.36


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-4

Page 5 of 10

South Whidbey Recreation Center A-E Firm Name:Whidbey Island, Washington ORB Architects, Inc.


34/43

y , g ,Estimated By: Checked By: Date:



J. F in ishesPaint Misc. Interior Surfaces 25,046 sf $0.65 $16,280Ceramic Tile Sanitary Floors 3,930 sf $9.10 $35,763Ceramic Tile Sanitary Wall Base 1,224 lf $13.00 $15,912Ceramic Tile Sanitary Walls & Wainscots 3,060 sf $7.80 $23,868Concrete Sealer at Pool Deck 4,760 sf $0.50 $2,380Epoxy Paint Pool Surfaces 5,530 sf $2.50 $13,825Ceramic Tile Top of Pool Walls 1,560 sf $11.70 $18,252Carpet 470 sy $31.20 $14,664Hardwood or Specialty Flooring 3,800 sf $15.00 $57,000Vinyl Composition or Sheet Vinyl 1,550 sf $3.90 $6,045Subtotal "J" $203,989 $8.14

K. SpecialtiesToilet Partitions 10 ea $1,040.00 $10,400Urinal Partitions 3 ea $390.00 $1,170Toilet Specialties 11 ea $650.00 $7,150Benches 135 lf $40.00 $5,400Lockers (In FF&E) 440 ea $160.00 $0Privacy Dressing Room Equipment 4 ea $1,300.00 $5,200Signage 1 ls $5,000.00 $5,000Counters 120 lf $52.00 $6,240Base Cabinets 120 lf $143.00 $17,160Overhead Cabinets 34 lf $104.00 $3,536Climbing Wall (10M x 10M w/ 6- auto carib) 1,500 sf $90.00 $135,000Subtotal "K" $196,256 $7.84

L. Swimming Pool SpecialtiesWaterslide 1 ea $250,000.00 $250,000Special Water Feature Effects 1 ls $50,000.00 $50,000Lifeguard Chairs 1 ea $2,500.00 $2,500Mobile Handicap Lift 1 ea $6,000.00 $6,000Wall Steps & Grabrails 4 set $1,500.00 $6,000Racing Lane Lines, Anchors & Reels 1 ls $5,800.00 $5,800

Accessory Inserts, Stanchions etc 1 ls $2,500.00 $2,500Continuous Deck Drain 320 lf $45.00 $14,400Subtotal "L" $337,200 $13.46

1. General Contractor Building Costs Subtotal $3,706,734 $148.00


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-5

Page 6 of 10



35/43

Estimated By: Checked By: Date:Project Title RDC GEA 9/10/2008

S Whidbey Recreation Center Status Of Design: ORB Job No.Concept Design Concept Design 2825


Building Costs

2. Mechanical Contractor WorkNote: Unit Costs Include Subcontractor OH&P

A. Plumbing SystemsFixtures, Venting, Piping & Insulation 70 ea $3,120.00 $218,400Subtotal "A" $218,400 $8.72

B. Fire SprinklersWet Pipe System 25,046 sf $3.12 $78,144Subtotal "B" $78,144 $3.12

C. Pool Hydraulics

Pumps, Filters, Valves, Chlorine Syst, 3,420 sf $54.60 $186,732River Channel Pool Hydraulics Systems 690 sf $91.00 $62,790Tots Pool Hydraulics Systems (Bubbles) 140 sf $91.00 $12,740Hot Tub Hydraulics Systems 80 sf $221.00 $17,680Chemical Controllers 2 ea $12,000.00 $24,000Commissioning, O&M, As-Builts 1 ls $14,000.00 $14,000 4,330Subtotal "C" $317,942 $90.84 ($/ sf of water)

D. VentilationPool Areas Heat & Vent 9,010 sf $18.00 $162,180Change Rooms Heat & Vent 3,930 sf $18.00 $70,740Dry Areas Heat & Vent W/ AC 9,586 sf $9.00 $86,274Ductwork / Diffusers & Installation 25,046 sf $12.00 $300,552

Commissioning, O&M, As-Builts 1 ls $14,000.00 $14,000Subtotal "D" $633,746 $25.30

E. Heating PlantCentral Boiler for Pool & Domestic, Stacks 1 ls $150,000.00 $150,000Heat Exch, Pumps, Piping, Valves & insulSubtotal "E" $150,000 $5.99

F . ControlsSystems Control 1 ls $75,000.00 $75,000Subtotal "F" $75,000 $2.99

G. Testing & Balancing

Piping & Ducted Systems 1 ls $25,000.00 $25,000Subtotal "G" $25,000 $1.00

2. Mechanical Contractor Building Costs Subtotal $1,498,232 $59.82


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-6

Page 7 of 10


E ti t d B Ch k d B D t


36/43




Building Costs

3. Electrical Contractor WorkNote: Unit Costs Include Subcontractor OH&P

A. Building InteriorService and Distribution 25,046 sf $5.14 $128,611Lighting 25,046 sf $7.98 $199,867Devices 25,046 sf $0.65 $16,280Equipment Connections 25,046 sf $0.83 $20,663Basic Materials 25,046 sf $3.47 $86,935Fire Alarm 25,046 sf $1.58 $39,447Telephone/Data/Cable Conduit 25,046 sf $0.56 $14,088Low Voltage Lighting Control 1 ls $12,000.00 $12,000Underwater Lights at Leisure Pool 1 ls $10,000.00 $10,000Security System 1 ls $12,000.00 $12,000Pool & Slide Panic Alarm 2 ea $3,000.00 $6,000Subtotal "A" $545,892

3. Electrical Contractor Building Costs Subtotal $545,892 $21.80


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-7

Page 8 of 10


Estimated By: Checked By: Date:


37/43




Sitework (6 Acres Gross Area)

1. General Contractor WorkNote: Unit Costs Include Subcontractor OH&P

A. Site Prep, Paving And SurfacingDemolish Structure & Paving 1 ls $25,000.00 $25,000Remove Trees & Grub Stumps 5.0 ac $18,000.00 $90,000Strip/Dispose Existing Topsoil 11,000 cy $30.00 $330,000Grade & Compact Soil 20,000 sy $3.00 $60,000Concrete Slabs / Walks & Base 14,250 sf $5.67 $80,798Curb & Gutter 4,200 lf $12.00 $50,400244 Car Parking Base & Permeable Asphalt 10,245 sy $40.00 $409,800Subtotal "A" $1,045,998

B. UtilitiesSanitary Sewer Force Main 1,000 lf $30.00 $30,000Septic Tank & Drainfield Construction 1 ea $193,000.00 $193,000Manhole / Pump Chamber 1 ea $10,000.00 $10,0006" Footing Drain or Rain Leader 1,900 lf $20.00 $38,000Cleanout at Grade 18 ea $260.00 $4,68012"-18" Storm Drain Pipe 2,000 lf $40.00 $80,000Catchbasin 12 ea $1,700.00 $20,400Yard Drains 7 ea $600.00 $4,200Oil/Water Separator 1 ea $30,000.00 $30,000Manhole 3 ea $3,500.00 $10,500Storm Detention 1 ea $250,000.00 $250,000

Connect to Storm System 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,0008" Water Piping 1,000 lf $40.00 $40,000Water Pipe Tap, Fittings, Valves 12 ea $910.00 $10,920Fire System Vault and assembly 1 ea $18,000.00 $18,000Fire Hydrant 3 ea $3,900.00 $11,700Subtotal "B" $753,400


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-8

Page 9 of 10




38/43




Sitework

C. Landscaping & IrrigationLawn Areas 90,730 sf $1.20 $108,876Planting Beds Mulch & Groundcover 20,835 sf $2.70 $56,255Shrubs 500 ea $30.00 $15,000Trees 100 ea $250.00 $25,000Irrigation System (plant beds & 50% / lawn) 66,200 sf $0.60 $39,720Ground Preparation And Finish Grading 111,565 sf $1.30 $145,035Subtotal "C" $389,885

D. Site ImprovementsFencing at Pool 240 lf $40.00 $9,600Pool Tank Excavation & Backfill 1 ls $35,000.00 $35,000Competitive Lap Pool Concrete (3.5 - 5' Deep) 3,450 sf $90.00 $310,500Ceramic Tile Top of Pool Walls 726 sf $11.70 $8,494Pumps, Filters, Valves, Chlorine Syst, 3,450 sf $54.60 $188,370Chemical Controllers 1 ea $12,000.00 $12,000Lifeguard Chairs 1 ea $2,500.00 $2,500Wall Steps & Grabrails 4 set $1,500.00 $6,000Racing Lane Lines, Anchors & Reels 1 ls $35,000.00 $35,000Starting Platforms 1 ls $26,000.00 $26,000

Accessory Inserts, Stanchions etc 1 ls $10,000.00 $10,000Epoxy Paint Pool Surfaces 4,590 sf $2.50 $11,475Continuous Deck Drain 285 lf $45.00 $12,825Drains, Fixtures, Venting, Piping 5 ea $3,120.00 $15,600Underwater Lights at Lap Pool 1 ls $25,000.00 $25,000Basketball Court Slab & Base 7,800 sf $5.67 $44,226Basketball Goals & Court Marking 2 ea $3,000.00 $6,000Facility Site Signage 1 ea $20,000 $20,000Subtotal "D" $778,590

1. General Contractor Sitework Costs Subtotal $2,967,873 $118.50

Sitework2. Electrical Contractor Work

Note: Unit Costs Include Subcontractor OH&P

A. Building Service And Site LightingBuilding Exterior Lighting 1 ls $20,000.00 $20,000Site Lighting 17 ea $5,000.00 $85,000Site Telephone, Power, Cable Distribution 1 ls $50,000.00 $50,000Subtotal "A" $155,000

2. Electrical Contractor Sitework Costs Subtotal $155,000 $6.19


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-9

Page 10 of 10




39/43

y yProject Title RDC GEA 9/10/2008



Optional Scope Items

1. Skylights at NatatoriumSkylights 600 sf $58.50 $35,100Structural Steel Framework 0.5 ton $3,000.00 $1,500GC Markup, Taxes, Conting, Escal & Fees 58.3% $21,338Subtotal "Option 1" $57,938 $2.31

2. "Green Roof" at Flat Roof AreasFlat Roof System "Green Roof" 15,946 sf $12.00 $191,352GC Markup, Taxes, Conting, Escal & Fees 58.3% $111,558Subtotal "Option 2" $302,910 $12.09

3. Enclose Outdoor Pool 6550 SFFencing Credit -240 lf $40.00 ($9,600)Footing Excavation & Backfill 240 lf $12.00 $2,880Footings 240 lf $35.00 $8,400Stem Walls 240 lf $36.00 $8,6408" CMU, Reinforced, Solid Grouted 7,200 sf $11.62 $83,664Brick or CMU Veneer 6,624 sf $12.38 $82,0053" Rigid Polyiso Insulation 6,624 sf $2.18 $14,440Bituthane Self Stick Vapor Retarder 6,624 sf $3.58 $23,7142" R-10 Perimiter Insulation at Foundation 960 sf $2.06 $1,978Sill Flashing 326 sf $5.82 $1,900Masonry Seal Exterior Faces 6,624 sf $0.46 $3,047Epoxy Paint Interior Cmu Faces 6,624 sf $1.63 $10,797Structural Steel Framework 20 ton $3,000.00 $60,000Open Web Joists 10 ton $2,500.00 $25,0001.5" x 20 ga Metal Deck 6,550 sf $2.50 $16,375

Anchor Bolts 1" x 1.33' max 50 ea $5.85 $293Flat Roof System 6,550 sf $12.68 $83,021Roof Drain & Leader 4 ea $1,500.00 $6,000Paint Exposed Deck & Structure 6,550 sf $3.25 $21,288

Aluminum - Double 4 ea $3,950.00 $15,800Exterior Alum Frame Insul Glazed 600 sf $52.00 $31,200Wet Pipe Fire Sprinkler System 6,550 sf $3.12 $20,436Pool Areas Heat & Vent 6,550 sf $18.00 $117,900Ductwork / Diffusers & Installation 6,550 sf $12.00 $78,600Lighting 6,550 sf $7.98 $52,269Devices 6,550 sf $0.65 $4,258Security System 1 ls $2,000.00 $2,000GC Markup, Taxes, Conting, Escal & Fees 58.3% $446,755Subtotal "Option 3" $1,213,058 $185.20

4. Ground Source Heat Pump System (Area of Magnitude Estimate - to be detailed further if accepted)Upgrade Costs to Add Ground Source Syst 25,046 sf $25.00 $626,150GC Markup, Taxes, Conting, Escal & Fees 53.3% $333,738Subtotal "Option 4" $959,888 $38.33


ORB Architects, Inc


9/12/2008

Page 4-10


40/43

SECTION 5 CONCEPT LAYOUT PLAN


41/43


42/43




The other room would have a durable wood floor that could accommodate dance, yoga, martial arts as well aslarger community meetings. Adjacent to and accessible from both spaces is a catering style kitchen.

A significant portion of the building space and cost is associated with the aquatic features entered through aChanging Room area that included Mens, Womens and Family Changing areas. This facility will have a largeLeisure Pool with a zero-depth entry, tots area, spray features & play equipment, a lazy river and two lap lanes. Awater slide, as mentioned, is accessed from inside but is an exterior feature for the building. Finally, within thenatatoriums enclosed space is also a hot tub. The Lap Pool is located adjacent to the Leisure Pool outside. Thisarea could be enclosed If budget allows, or as a future phase of the facility. The current outdoor arrangementallows for the Leisure Pool to spill out to the outdoor deck area on warm sunny days.


43/43




Date post:	30-May-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	southwhidbey
View:	214 times
Download:	0 times

SWPRD Report-Draft 080912

Documents