Synthetic Studies of Benzoannulated Metaparacyclophanes
by
Cheung Siu-shing
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of
Master of philosophy in
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
1986
Thesis Committee
Dr. H. N. C. Wong, Chairman
Dr. T. L. Chan
Dr. C. N. Lam
Prof. R. H. Mitchell, External Examiner
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to express his sincere thanks to his
supervisor, Dr. H.N.C. Wong, for his invaluable advice, guidance
and encouragement during the course of research and the
preparation of this thesis.
He is also grateful to Mr. K.W. Kwong and Mr. C.W. Fung for
their assistance in measuring all the 250MHz proton nuclear
magnetic resonance spectra and mass spectra..:
Special thanks are given to the Croucher Foundation for the
award of a'studentship.
June 1986
Cheung Siu-shing
Chemistry Department
The Chinese University
of Hong Kong
CONTENTS
I LIST OF NOMENCLATURE
II ABSTRACT
III INTRODUCTION
IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 18
(A) SYNTHESIS OF 1 2-BENZO2, 2]METAPARACYCL0PHANE18
(B) 2-BENZO2,2]METAPARACYCLOPHAN- SYNTHESIS OF
1
9-ENE 33
(C) SYNTHESIS OF 1,2:9,10--DIBENZO2,2]METAPARA-
CYCLOPHANE BY CRAM'S REARRANGEMENT 39
(D) SPECTRAL CHARACTERISTICS OF [2,2]METAPARACYCLO-
PHANES 41
V CONCLUSION- 46
VI EXPERIMENTAL SECTION48
VII REFERENCES 59
VIII SPECTRA 62
4
5
I LIST OF NOMENCLATURE
Trivial: 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane
IUPAC: 10,ll-dihydro-12,15-etheno-5,9-metheno-benzocyclo-
tridecene
Trivial: 1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane
IUPAC: 9,10-dihydro-5,8:ll,14-dietheno-benzocyclododecene
(a)
Trivial: 1,2-benzo-10~bromo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane
IUPAC: ll-bromo-10,ll-dihydro-12,15-etheno-5,9-metheno-
benzocyclotridecene
(b)
Trivial: 1,2-benzo-9-bromo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane
IUPAC: 10-bromo-10,ll-dihydro-12,15--etheno-5,9-met:heno-
benzocyclotridecene
Trivial: 1,2-benzo- [2,2. ]metaparacyclophan-9-ene
IUPAC: 12,15-etheno-5,9-metheno-benzocyclotridecene
Trivial: 1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophan-9-ene
IUPAC: 5,8:11,14-dietheno-benzocyclododecene
Trivial: 9,9-dibromo-l,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane
IUPAC: 9,9-dibromo-9,10~dihydro-5,8:ll,14-dietheno-ben:
cyclododecene
Trivial:
IUPAC: 9,12-dihydro-9,12-endoxo-5,8:13,16-dietheno-dibenzo-
cyclododecene
Trivial: 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2]paracyclophane
IUPAC: 5,8:13,16-dietheno-dibenzocyclododecene
Trivial: 1,2:9,10--dibenzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane
IUPAC: 14,17-etheno-5,9-metheno-dibenzocyclotridecene
II ABSTRACT
The synthetic methods of [2,2jmetaparacyclophane (2) and its
derivatives were briefly reviewed. 3,4-Bis(bromomethy1)-
1,1':2',1-terpheny1 (2b) was prepared according to VBgtle's
procedures. The dibromide 25 was coupled by treatment with
phenyHithium to give 1,2-benzo~[2,2Jmetaparacyclophane (24) and'VY,
a dimer 52 in 30% and 12, respectively. As an alternative
synthetic approach, treatment of 1,2-benzo-[2,2Jparacyclophane
(32) with HC1-A1C1~-CH0C10 also led to 24 in 22.5 1 yield.
Bromination and subsequent dehydrobromination of 24 gave
1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophan-9-ene (30). However, treatment
of 1, 2-benzo-[ 2, 2] paracyclophan--9-ene (4) with HCl-AlCly CH2CI2
did not give the related 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophan-9-ene
(30) but instead, benzo[eJpyrene was produced in 6%.
Moreover, when 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2Jparacyclophane (35) was
subjected to HCI-AICI2-CH2CI2, a chlorinated [2,2jmetaparacyclo¬
phane 61 was probably produced. The NMR spectra of 24 and 30 have
been analyzed. The UV spectra of [2,2]metaparacyclophanes 24,rVj'
30, and 61 as well as the related [2,2]paracyclophanes 32, 34,
and 35 were recorded.
Ill INTRODUCTION
(A) General Introduction
The synthesis of [m,nJcyclophanes (1) by Professor Cram is
a landmark in the field of cyclophane chemistry. During the past
three decades, although much efforts have been made in this
field, including the preparation of different kinds of
cyclophanes and the study of their properties, many other
interesting features still remain for further investigation.
In this thesis, we will concentrate our attention on [2,2]
metaparacyclophane (2) and its derivatives. The other trivial
name used to describe compound 2 is [2,2](1,3)(1,4)cyclophane.
The numbering system for the nomenclature is illustrated in
Scheme I.
Scheme I
Due to the strain exerted by the short bridges, the two
benzene decks bend from their normal planar configuration. Thus,
the para-substituted ring would lead to a boat form and the meta-
substituted ring would bend to a distorted chair form. Moreover,
the electron clouds of the aromatic rings interact strongly with
each other due to the violation of the normal van der Waals
radius. As a result of ring deformation and closeness of the two
benzene decks, molecule 2 shows a large ring strain (23%
kcalmole). When compared with its symmetric isomers, namely,
[2,2]paracyclophane (3) and [2, 2]metacyclophane (4), it is less
strained than the former (31 kcalmole) but more strained than
the latter (13 kcalmole).
As a consequence of large ring strain and conformational
rigidity of the molecular framework, the geometries of molecule 2
and its derivatives differ from those of the closely related
symmetric [2,2]cyclophanes, 3 and 4. Moreover, in its
5 9-11conformation flipping', the substituent at the 8-position of
the meta-ring in the transition state will fall into the aromatic
Tr-electron cloud of the para-ring (Fig 1). Therefore, this class
of compound is stereochemically intriguing. On the other hand,
they provide a vehicle for the studies of transannular
interactions in cyclophanes.
Figure 1 Conformational flipping of [2,2]metaparacyclophane (2)
In order to investigate and to understand the chemical and
physical properties of these compounds, considerable efforts have
r| obeen put on the synthesis of these cyclophanes'. The following
text would give a brief review on the synthetic approaches which
are most commonly used.
(B) Synthesis of [2,2 ]Metaparacyclophane and its Derivatives
(i) Stevens rearrangement-Hofmann elimination approach
The essential characteristic of this approach involves a two
step sequence: a Stevens rearrangement followed by a Hofmann
11 13 1elimination''. It is an advantageous procedure for the
preparation of [2,2]metaparacyclophane-1,9-diene (10) as well as
other [2,2]metaparacyclophanes with substituents at specific
positions (Scheme II).
11 1 A-It was reported' that 1,3-bis(mercaptomethyl)benzene
(5) condensed with p-xylylene dibromide (6) to give 2,11-dithia-—
[3,3]metaparacyclophane (7). Stevens rearrangement of 7 was
accomplished by treatment with dimethoxycarbonium fluoroborate,
followed by potassium tert-butoxide. The products were isomers 8'X,
and 9 which were subjected to Hofmann elimination. Thus, 8 and 9
Scheme II
QUI SH
(5)rj
Br Br
(6)%
(7)
1) (CH 0) CH+BF,
t2) K0 Bu
S tevens
Re a r ran gemen t
HoCS sch3 h3cs
sc h3
(8) (9:o,
1) (ch3o)2ch+bf4
2) KOBu
Ho f maim
Elimination
ypt
(2) (10)XjXJ
were treated again with dimethoxycarbonium fluoroborate and
potassium tert-butoxide so that [2,2]metaparacyclophane-1,9-diene
(10) was obtained. The hydrogenation of 10 over Adams' catalyst
gave cyclophane 2.•u
The advantages of this approach are the ready availability
of starting materials and the simplicity in carrying out the
reaction steps. Moreover, this approach has also been applied to
prepare the 8-substituted derivatives of 2 and 10, namely, 11 andOAj% rbrV'
12 respectively, by using the corresponding 2-substituted-1,3-
bis(mercaptomethyl)benzene (13).0b
(1 la-d)rVXb%
SH X SH
(13a-d)WXf%
a) X=F
b) X=CN%
c) X=CH0
d) X=D
(ii) Bis(dithiane) Alkylat ion Approach
The application of 1,3-dithiane to the synthesis of
substituted carbonyl compounds was developed by Corey and
Seebach. Boekelheide and his co-workers' made use of this
so-called Umpolung reaction to prepare the parent cyclophane 2 asj
well as its diene 10. The synthetic procedure is shown in Scheme• 'b'b
III.
Scheme III
SH SH
OHC CHO
(14)V
(15)
1) nBuLi
(6)%
HgCl2
Me OH
rAj
NaBH,H
(16) Raney Ni
HO, (OH
TsCl
TsO ,OTs
(2)
(18) (19)KOtBu
(10)rWj
Alkylation of isophthalaldehyde bis(dithioacetal) (15) with
p-xylylene dibromide (6) gave the corresponding substituted
[2,2]metaparacyclophane 16. Compound 2 was obtained by
hydrodesulfurization of 16 with Raney nickel'. On the other
hand, 16 could be hydrolyzed with mercuric chloride in methanol
to give [2,2]metaparacyclophane-l,9-dione (17). Reduction of 17
with sodium borohydride led to a mixture of diastereoisomeric
alcohols 18 which was converted to the corresponding bis-tosylate
19. Compound 19 was treated with potassium tert-butoxide to
furnish the diene 10'.
The dithiane alkylation procedure is suitable for the
preparation of cyclophane derivatives bearing functionality on
the aliphatic bridges.
(iii) Pyrolysis of sulfone compounds
This approach' involves MCPBA oxidation of the 2,11-
dithia-[3,3]metaparacyclophane derivatives 22 which could be
prepared from the condensation of substituted 1,3—
bis(bromomethyl)benzene 20 and 1,4-bis(mercaptomethyl)benzene
(21). The corresponding bis(sulfone) 23, on pyrolysis at
approximately 500 C, would extrude sulfur dioxide to give the
desired products 11 directly (Scheme IV).
In view of the simplicity of the synthetic sequence and the
high yields of all steps, the aforementioned procedure is an
efficient method for the preparation of substituted
[2,2]metaparacyclophanes, such as llk-n.
Scheme IV
Y
Br X Br
(2 0 a- f)W 'X,
Hi
HS
(21)
Y
SX
s
(22a-f)rjfjrj 'Xy
MCPBA
Y
y
(lle-1)'Xy'XyXyVj
Y
SO,
X
SOo
(23a-f)'VXV, a.
u x Y
aOf
b
c
. dOj
e
n
eOy
f'j
ga,
h
i
J
Br
Me
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
no2
Br
OMe
COCHo
X
1) X=F, Y=H
m) X=F, Y=Br
n) X=F, Y=CH„
Y
(Ilk) (11 l-n)ry'Yj 'YJ
17Making use of the pyrolysis of sulfones, Vgtle has
synthesized 1,2-benzo-[2,2jmetaparacyclophane (24) which is the
first example of a benzoannulated [2, 2]metaparacyclophane. 3,4-
Bis(bromomethyl)-1,1':2',1-terphenyl (25) was treated withOAj
,Br
R
CH3CSNH2
s
(25)v.
(26)
H2°2
6nn °r.
(24)
so2
(27)Vb
thioacetamide to provide the cyclic sulfide 26. Oxidation of
with hydrogen peroxide led to sulfone 27, which on pyrolysis at
600°C under reduced pressure, was converted to 24.
(iv) Lewis Acid Catalyzed Rearrangement
The skeletal rearrangement of [2,2]paracyclophane Q) to
[ 2,2 ]me taparacyclophane (2) was first reported by Cram
Thus, treatment of 3 with hydrogen chloride saturated solution of
aluminium chloride in dichloromethane at -10 °C furnished 2 in
18b 20good yield. Moreover, the rearrangement is stereospecific'
A1C1
HCl
ch2CI2
-10 °C
(3)
and the evidence for the stereospecificity is provided by the
studies of the acid catalyzed rearrangement of optically pure
(+)-(S)-4-methy1-[2,2]paracyclophane (28) to optically pure(+)-
(S)-12-methyl[2,2]metaparacyclophane (29).
A1C13
HCl
CH2C12
-10 'c
(28)fj (29)
'w
Furthermore, the mechanism for the rearrangement was
qi 0 rbelieved' to follow the route which is shown in Scheme V.
Scheme V
(28)
++H
+-H
, H
AB
(29)fAj
-H+
H
C
19Release of strain appears to be one of the driving forces
for the rearrangement since product 2 is approximately 8
kcalmole less strained than 3. Another possible driving force is
perhaps due to the fact that meta-dialkylated benzenes are
stronger bases than para-dialkylated benzenes toward proton
'•a 21acids
(C) Aim of Project
In .order to study in details the possible electronic
interactions and charge-transfer character of [2,2]metaparacyclo-
phanes, we would like to synthesize the three benzo-[2,2]meta-
paracyclophanes 24, 30 and 31. Although compound 24 was first
(24)OA, m (31)
a, a,
1 7synthesized by VBgtle, we would like to modify VBgtle
2 2procedures by using Boekelheide's method, since Boekelheide
reported the preparation of 1, 2-benzo-[ 2, 2 ]paracyclophane (32), anrWf
isomer of 24, by coupling dibromide 33 directly with(Aj (jIJ
? ?
pheny Hi thium
Br
Br
(33)rXY
C.H-Li6 5
(32)rAj
Utilization of compound 24 as starting material, 30 and 31ry ryj OOj
would be prepared by bromination, dehydrobromination and trapping
a 22,23procedures'
As an alternative synthetic pathway, we would attempt to
18-20synthesize the target molecules by Cram's rearrangement,
using the corresponding benzo-[ 2, 2 ]paracyclophanes 32',Wi
3422)23 an( 3523 as startj_ng materials.
(34)rV»
(35)w
IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(A) Synthesis of 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24)
(24)
(i) By the VBgtle-Boekelheide method
(a) Synthesis of 3,4-bis(bromomethy1)-1,1':2',1-terpheny1 (25)
(25)
Compound 25 is the precursor for the synthesis of 24. It can
17 25 26be prepared according to the route'' outlined in scheme VI.
The first step of the synthetic sequence is the
2 6transformation of p-toluidine (36) to p-iodo-toluene (37) via
NH1) NaN02
HC1, -20°C
2) KI; i2
r. t.
(36) (37)
Scheme VI
NH_NaN02
H SO,, -20°C2 4
KI, I
r i. t.
(36)
I
(37)ryj
Cu20, 200°C
no2
'C02H
(38)
N°2
(39)
NH2NH2
Raney Ni80°C•
I
(41)
NaN02
HC1, 0°C
KI, I,r. t.
-nh2
(40)
1) n-BuLi, 0°C 3) DDQ
120C
0
(42)Aj
NBS
AIBN
CH2C12
hu
(43) (25)
,Br
.Br
a diazonium salt. Treatment of 36 with sodium nitrite in sulfuricAb
acid gave the diazonium salt which reacted with potassium iodide
to give 37 in 64%. Iodide 37 forms white crystals with m.p. 34-
35 °C. The NMR spectrum of 37 shows a singlet at 62.25 and a
multiplet at 66.80-7.60. The integration ratio of these signals
are three to four. They correlate to the methyl protons and the
phenyl protons of 37, respectively. Moreover, a base peak at meAAt
218 which corresponds to the molecular ion of 37 has been
recorded by mass spectrometry.
The preparation of 4-methy1-2'-nitro biphenyl (39) was notAA»
trivial. The method used by VBgtle involved a simple procedure of
heating mixture of 37, o-nitro-benzoic acid and quinoline to
155 °C, followed by addition of copper (I) oxide. On distillation,
an orange-red viscous liquid product of 39 was obtained in 63%Ab
yield. The distillate product was used for further reaction
without any other purification. However, no spectroscopic data of
2539 have been reported. Hence, the purity of 39 was not clear.
Straightforwardly, we repeated the same procedure used by
25VBgtle. However, the result was not satisfactory. Firstly, the
yield was much lower than expected, for example, 20 g of 37 could
only produce 1 g of the orange-red product, therefore, the yield
I
(IVAi
no2
co2h
(38)
Cu20
quinoline200 °C
N02
(LL
(39)
of 39 was only approximately 5%. Secondly, spectraldata (NMRmvVb
and MS) reveal that the product is not pure and contains a
mixture of 39 and an unknown compound 44. The NMR spectrum
exhibits two singlets at 62.28 and 62.30 and a multiplet at
66.90-8.00 (Figure 2). According to the structure of 39, oneAJ
62.3C 62 .28
3 7~ 6 5 4 3 2-1 0
Figure 2 NMR spectrum of mixture of 4-methyl~2'-nitro biphenyl
(39) and 44
singlet for the methyl protons is expected. Furthermore, in
addition to a peak at me 213 for the molecular ion of 39, thereAJ
is a peak at me 229 (M+ of 39+ 16) in the mass spectrum.— fAj
However, compounds 39 and 44 could not be separated byrj OA,
chromatography.
In order to improve the efficiency of the reaction, various
conditions have been modified. These• included: reaction
temperature, purity of o-nitro-benzoic acid (38) and dryness of
apparatus. Despite various efforts had been tried, the same
result was obtained. Due to the fact, that 39 and 44 wererAj rj
inseparable, the mixture after chromatography was used for
further reaction without further purification. The mechanism for
the production of 44 is still unclear.
25The next stage of synthetic sequence is the reduction of
39 to 40. The mixture containing 39 and 44 was treated with
hydrazine hydrate and Raney nickel in ethanol. After reaction, a
crude colorless product was collected. Again, it was a mixture of
two components 40 and 45 which could not be separated by
. N02
C 441
NH2NH2
Rariey Ni
EtOH
80 °C
• NH2
fAro
fAS
chromatography. This result was confirmed by spectral data. The
NMR spectrum of the mixture of 40 and 45 shows two singlets at
62.28 and 62.30, a singlet at 63.65 and a multiplet at 66.60-7.40
(Figure 3). Moreover, two strong peaks at me. 183 and 199 have
62.30 62.28
87 8 54 3 2 1 o
Figure 3 NMR spectrum of mixture of 2-amino-4'-methy1 biphenyl
(40) and 45
been recorded in the mass spectrum. The former correlates to the
molecular ion of 40 and the latter with me 199 (M+ of 40+ 16)
may correlate to 45. Since 40 and 45 were inseparable, the
mixture containing them was used for the next step.
Mixture of 40 and 45 was treated with sodium nitrite
solution in hydrochloric acid to give a diazonium salt, which was
allowed to react with potassium iodide. Two compounds were
isolated by column chromatography.
,NH2
(40)
(45)
NaN02
HCl, 0 °C
KI I?
V t.
' I
( A1
(h(-
The less polar compound (TLC R:0.39; solvent, hexanes)
shows a base peak at me 294 in its mass spectrum and a singlet
at 62.35 and a multiplet at 66.80-8.10 in its NMR spectrum (NMR-
1). Therefore, this colorless oily liquid sample is expected to
be the required product, namely, 2-iodo-4'-methy 1 biphenyl (41).
The percentage yield of 41 was 39%.
The more polar compound 46. (TLC Rr:0.31; solvent, hexanes)
has a similar NMR spectrum (NMR-2) as 41 but the singlet of 46 is
recorded at 62.30 (0.05 ppm high field shift when compared with
41). The base peak in its mass spectrum appears at me 310 (M+ of
41+ 16).
By examination of its spectral data, compound 46 is
tentatively assigned to be 2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl ether (46).
(U6)
Thus, the mass spectrum of it shows peaks of its fragments at me_
183, 168 and 91 and the fragmentation pathway is given in scheme
VII. The tropylium ion, jrn91, is an evidence for the ether
structure since 4-methyl biphenyl compounds would not give this
fragment. Furthermore, compound 46 would have very similar NMR
Scheme VII
I
310
-I
91 -CH
'0
183
0
168
spectrum (NMR-2) as 41 (NMR-1). In addition, compound 4 shows
absorptions at 1021 cm 1239 cm 1469-1605 cm, 2928 cm
and 3072 cm' in its IR spectrum (IR-1). The first two
27absorptions correlate to the symmetric and asymmetric
stretching of C-O-C bond, respectively. The last three correlate
to the stretching of the CC bond in the aromatic rings, the C-H
bonds in the methyl group and the C-H bonds in the aromatic
rings, respectively.
Thus, the unknowns containing in the mixtures with 3$, and 40
could tentatively be assigned structures 44 and 45, accordingly.OA; Ai
This assignment is supported by their NMR and MS data although
more vigorous confirmation is still required.
0
(44)
-nh2
'0
(45)
3,4-Dimethy 1-1,11:2' ,1-terpheny1 (43) could be prepared by
17
a three step-one pot reaction starting from 2-iodo-4'-methyl
biphenyl (41). Lithiation of 41 with n-butyl lithium produced 47
which reacted with 3-methy1-2-cyclohexen-1-one (42) to giveIAJ
alcohol 48 after quenching with sulfuric acid. The dehydration of
48 and aromatization of diene 49 was carried out• simultaneously
by stirring the mixture with sulfuric acid for a few days.
Although the diene 49 could be air oxidized to compound 43 on
stirring. The aromatization process was better carried out by
treatment with DDQ. The overall yield of the reaction was 26%.
Compound 43 is a colorless viscous liquid which shows a base peak
I
(41)
nBuLi, 0 °C
Li
(47)
1)
O
(42)
2) H?SO
HO
(49)(48)
1) air oxidized
2) DDQ
(43)IAj
at me 258 in its mass spectrum. Two singlets of the methyl
protons at 62.25 and 82.30 and a multiplet of the three phenyl
ring protons at 67.00-7.50 can be found in its NMR spectrum.
1Bromination of 43 was accomplished by reaction with two
equivalent of NBS in dichloromethane under irradiation with a
NBS
AIBN
ch2ci2
hv
(43s)
(25)
Br
Br
Br
(50) (51)
Br
200 W sunlamp. Compound 25 and the monobromides 50 and 51 wereOY 'VYf rjj
17isolated in 90% and 7% yields, respectively. Bromination of
the monobromides and 51 with one equivalent of NBS also led
Br
(50) rsn
Br
NBS
AIBN
CH2C12
hv
Br
„ Br
(25)
to 25 in 70% yield. The mass spectrum of 25 shows a pattern of'W 'W,
1:2:1 at _me 414, 416, 418 which gives concrete evidence of a
dibromide. 'The NMR spectrum of 25 exhibits two singlets at 54.-25rVj
and 64.-38 which correlate to the two sets of methylene protons. A
multiplet at 66.90-7.30 correlates to the phenyl-ring protons.
(b) Coupling of 3,4-bis(bromomethy1)-1,1':2',1-terphenyl (25)
with phenyllithium
It has been reported recently that compound 24 has been
synthesized. However, this route consisted of three steps
Br
Br
(25)
CH3CSNH2
s
(26)
H2°2
600 °C
(24)
so„
which started from compound 25 and included a pyrolysis process
at 600 °C under reduced pressure. On the other hand, the
22procedure used by Boekelheide to effect the coupling of
V 4
dibromide 33 to 1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane (32) with
phenyllithium was essentially- a one step reaction. We,
therefore, have chosen to adopt the second synthetic method.
'Br
Br
C.H Li6 5
Et20
(33) (32)
22When dibromide 25 was subiected to reaction with 1.5
2 8equivalent of pheny Hi thium in ether, the result of the
reaction was not satisfactory. 30% of the starting material 25rj
could be recovered, therefore, the yield of 24 was approximately
10% based on reacted 25. Moreover, a dimer 52 was obtained inrjr
17% yield.
Br
Br
(25)
C,H Li6 5
E tO
(52)
In order to improve the reaction, excess of phenyHithium
was used so that the reaction could be driven to completion.
Furthermore, highly diluted condition was applied in order to
avoid the dimerization of 25. As a result, these modifications
not only increased remarkably the yield of the cyclophane 24 to
30% but also diminished the production of the dimer to 12%.
Moreover, all dibromide 25 could be consumed.rVY
Dimer 52 forms white crystals with m.p. 103-105 °C which
should contain two isomers 53 and 54. Dimer 52 shows a base peakOA fj AA
(53) (54)
at me 512 in its mass spectrum. A multiplet at 6 2.80-3.10
correlates to the ethylene protons and a multiplet at 56.40-7.50
correlates to the six phenyl rings protons are recorded in its
NMR spectrum (NMR-4).
On the other hand, 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24)V
forms colorless needles with m.p. 115-118 °C after
recrystallization from carbon tetrachloride. The base peak in
its mass spectrum appears at me_ 256 which is the molecular ion
17of 24. It has a complicated NMR spectrum (NMR-3) which contains
'VU
a set of multiplets at. 5 2.20-3.30, a singlet at 6 5.43, a set of
multiplets at 56.11-6.22, a set of multiplets at 66.80-7.17 and a
multiplet at o 7.28-7.77. The first set of multiplets correlates»
to the ethylene bridge protons and due to the rigidity of the
molecular framework and different magnetic environment of each
proton, the four protons are nonequivalent and show an ABCD
system (Figure 4). From figure 4, the coupling constants can be
calculated to be Jaq=6«5Hz, JA(.= 11.8Hz, Jg=5.7Hz,
JDn=11.8Hz, and J«n=11.8Hz. From the structure of 24 and the
magnitude of the coupling constants, the position of the protons
JAB 0
Jac=11.8H:
jad=.5HZ
BC=
JBD=11.8Hs
Jcd=11.8H5
ic
v
•~igUre NMR sPectrum of the ethylene birdge protons of 24 and
its analysis
on the ethylene bridge are tentatively assigned as shown in
figure 4. The singlet which appears at 65.43 correlates to the
proton at the 8-position. The high field shift of this aromatic
proton could be explained by the fact that it falls into the
upfxeld region of the para-substituted benzene deck
The second set of multiplets at 66.11-6.22 correlates to two
of the four protons on the para-substituted benzene ring and they
are indicated as protons A and B in figure 5. The high field
shift of these aromatic protons is due to the distortion of the
benzene deck which shows some olefinic character and the effect
of the upfield region of the meta-substituted benzene deck.
Protons A and B can be analyzed and the results afford coupling
constants Jg=8Hz, J=JgY=l• 5Hz, and JaY=BX= at,sorPton
of protons X and Y are obscured by the other aromatic protons
which appear at 6 7.28-7.77. The third set of multiplets at
66.80-7.17 corresponds to the three protons on the meta-
substituted benzene deck (figure 5). It shows an ABC system with
coupling constants ,g=Jg ,,=7.5Hz and t,=0. Therefore,
proton B' is a triplet while the other two are doublets. The
B'
A'. C'
A B
JA 'b' Jb' C'• 5 H z
JA'C'~°
JAB=8Hz
JAX=JBY=1 5Hz
JAY=JBX=0
HR
H .He
Hb
Hx Hy
7.0 6.0
Figure 5 NMR spectrum at 6 6.11-7.17 of 24 and its analysis
complexity of the fourth set of multiplet at 6 7.28-7.77 makes it
difficult to be analyzed and it represents the signals of the
other protons, i.e. X and Y, on the para-substituted benzene ring
and the protons on the ortho-substituted benzene ring.
(iiy By Cram's rearrangement method
When crystals of 1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane (32)' was
added to a hydrogen chloride gas saturated dichloromethane
solution containing aluminium chloride, a red solution was
generated. After stirring at -10 C for 2 hrs, 32 was recovered in
45% and the desired product 24 was obtained in 22.5% yield. The
aici3
HCl
ch2ci2
-10 °C
(32) (24)
product 24 exhibits NMR spectrum (NMR-5) with the same
characteristic signals which have been described previously.
Moreover, a base peak at me 254 was recorded in its mass
spectrum.
(B) Synthesis of 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophan-9-ene (30)
(i) By bromination, dehydrobromination procedure
The synthetic route towards 30 was shown in scheme VIII.
However, the bromination of compound 24 was not as trivial as the
bromination of 3,4-dimethy1-1,1':2',1-terpheny1 (43) which
Scheme VIII
NBS
AIBN
CH2C12
hv
(24)
Br
(55)
KoSu
THF
r. t.
(30)
has been previously discussed. Treatment of 24 with NBS and AIBN
under irradiation for 12 hrs resulted in the isolation of a
slightly yellowish oil as well as the starting material 24 inOA,
nearly equal amount after chromatography. The NMR spectrum (NMR-
6) of this oil is too complicated to be analyzed and signals
appear throughout the spectrum from 62.30 to 6 8.00. The mass
spectrum of it gives peaks at ne 334, 336, 412, 414, 416,
492, 494, 496 and 498 which represent the molecular ions of 55fAj
and polybrominated products. However, chromatographic studies
revealed that they were inseparable but compound 55 was believedOA
to be one of the major components in the oil. Moreover, the exact
position of the bromine moiety in the monobrominated product 55
cannot be determined due to the complexity of the NMR spectrum.
In order to reduce the amount of the undesired
polybrominated products, the reaction was not allowed to go to
completion. The oily mixture containing compound 55 was subjected
to dehvdrobromination without additional purification.
22Treatment of crude 55 with potassium tert-butoxide
smoothly gave the required product 30 in 13% yield. It forms
white crystals which melt at 89-90 °C (without recrystallization).
The base peak in its mass spectrum appears at _me 254 which
represents the molecular ion of 3£h In its NMR spectrum (NMR-7),
K0 tBu
BrTHF r. t.
(55)rAj
(30)
a singlet at 64.79 for the proton at the 8-position and a
multiplet at 66.72-7.77 for the olefinic and aromatic protons are
observed. The multiplet is tentatively analyzed in figure 6.
The analysis of the spectrum can be divided into four parts.
Firstly, two doublets at 66.72 and 67.22 are assigned to the two
olefinic protons and they show an AX system with coupling
constant J=10.3Hz. Secondly, the sub-multiplet at 6 6.85-7.15
corresponds to the three protons on the meta-substituted benzene
ring. It shows an ABC system with coupling constants
A' B 1 =B' C' an A'C,== Therefore, proton B' is a triplet
while the other two are doublets. Thirdly, the sub-multiplet at
67.38-7.77 correlates to the proton on the ortho-substituted
1
2
3
4;
A, D
B C
I
B
A'. C
sH,
u
u_
u
H
H
Hr
H H
8I
7
Figure—6 NMR spectrum at 56.72-7.77 of 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metapara-
cyclophan-9-ene (30) and its analysis
benzo-group. It is an ABCD system with coupling constants
JAB=JBC= CD,i=' Jg!ijQii=JiiQii= l. 7Hz and Jmqm=0. The low
field shift of protons A and DM is due to the proximity to the
two benzene decks.
Finally, the singlet at 66.95 can be attributed to the four
protons on the para-substituted benzene ring. The appearance of
this singlet, not a multiplet for these protons, might be due to
the reasons that the meta-substituted benzene ring flips rapidly
29or it sits perpendicularly on the para-substituted benzene deck
so that similar environment could be produced by the benzene and
the olefinic moiety. Moreover, the distortion of this benzene
deck to have olefinic character results in the high field shift
of these aromatic protons.
(ii) By Cram's rearrangement method
0 0 o o
When 1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophan-9-ene (34)' was sub-
1 9
jected to HCl-AlCl-CFC at -10°C, an intensely red solution
was obtained. After working up, the desired product 30 would not
be isolated but instead, benzo[e]pyrene (56) was produced in 6%A«A.
A1C13
HCl•
CH2C12
-10'C
(34)
(56)
yield as 2 the only isolable product. Compound 56 forms goldenAj
needles with m.p. 172-175 °C( lita m.p. 178-179 °C). In its mass
spectrum, a base peak at nije 252 is observed and in its NMR
spectrum (NMR-8), sets of multiplets appear at 6 7.77-8. 92 arid it
is analyzed as figure 7. The spectroscopic data are in full
30a- cagreement with the literature value
(m)7.77
(m)o.90
(d)8.92
(s)8.06
(d)8.20;
(t) 8.05
Figure 7 H chemical shift (6) values for benzo[e]pyrene (56)
The production of benzo[e]pyrene (56) might follow the route'Xj'Xj
outlined in scheme IX. The two para-substituted benzene rings in
34 rearrange to meta-substituted benzene rings stepwisely, via
Scheme IX
aici3
HC1
ch2ci2
-10 'C
(34)
A1C13
HC1
CH2C12
-10 'C
trans annular
dehydrogenation
(56) (57)
30, to 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metacyclophan-9-ene (57) in the presence
31
of Lewis acid. Transannular dehydrogenation of 5j7 would lead to
56. The possible driving forces of the rearrangement appear to be
the gain in aromatic stabilization through the production of
compound 56 and the release of strain of the cyclophanes.r s.
(C) Synthesis of 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2jmetaparacyclophane (31) by
Cram's rearrangement method
The starting material, 1, 2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2jmetaparacyclo-
phane (35), for the rearrangement can be prepared'
according to scheme X.
Scheme X
1) KoSu
THF'Br
Bi-
CSS)
2)
0
(59)
0
(60)
TiCl.4
LAH
NEt3
THF
(35)
1 9
When compound 35 was treated with HCl-AlCl-CtCl at
-10 °C, it gradually changed to yellow in color on stirring. After
working up, apart from the recovery of 7.5% of the starting
material 35, trace amount of a white solid (0.1 mg) with m.p.rVj
208-210°C was obtained as the only isolable product. From its
spectral data, it may possibly be chlorinated compound 61. Its
A1C1
HC1
ch2CI2
-10 °c
(35)
-CI
mass spectrum shows an 1:3 pattern at me 340 (M++2) and 338 (M+,
base peak) which gives evidence for a monochlorinated compound.
Further evidence is the appearance of peaks at me 303 (M+-C1)
and 302 (M+-HC1). Since the amount of 61 obtained was very small,'W,
it could only produce a weak NMR spectrum (NMR-9), which exhibits
two singlets at 6 5.17 and 6 6.42, and multiplets at 6 6.56-6.84,
and 67.20-7.72. The appearance of a singlet at 65.17 may probably
be an evidence for having a skeleton of a [2,2]metaparacyclophane
since the singlet at this region would correspond to the proton
at the 8-position and it is a characteristic of NMR spectra of
[2,2]metaparacyclophane family. The multiplets at 66.56-6.84
corresponds to the protons on the para-substituted benzene ring
and the meta-substituted benzene ring. The presence of a singlet
at 66.42 might indicate that the chloride atom is on the para
substituted benzene ring. The last multiplet correlates to the
(61)
protons on the two ortho-substituted benzene rings. Due to the
weaknesses of the signals, these peaks cannot be confidently
assigned and thus the exact position of the chlorine atom in
molecule 61 is not completely clear. Furthermore, the molecular
formula of 61 can be further confirmed by high resolution massOA,
spectrum. Due to the fact that compound 35 can be prepared only
in extremely small quantity, our effort in the synthesis and
unequivocal characterization of 61 is seriously hampered.OAj
(D) Spectral characteristics of [2,2]metaparacyclophanes
(i) NMR spectra
Due to the rigidity of the molecular framework and the
specific orientation of the benzene decks, each member in the
class of [2,2]metaparacyclophanes shows its NMR spectrum with
specific feature. The signals exhibit by the protons at 8-
positions (inner proton) are especially interesting because they
fall into the upfield region of the opposite para-substituted
benzene deck. Thus, they show unusual high field shift despite
the fact that they are aromatic protons.
32It has been reported that the signals of the inner protons
of compound 2 and 10 in their NMR spectra appear at 6 5.24 and
64.29, respectively. It seems that shorter bridge distance of the
65.24
f H
(2)
'H
(10)
64.29
two C=C bonds has a overwhelming effect than the widening of the
bridging carbon angle from 109 (sp) to 120 (sp). Hence, the
inner proton in 10 penetrates farther into the u-cavity than doesOA,
the one in 2 and thus the former is more shielded.
When compounds 24, 61 and 30 are compared, the following
observation is obtained. The signals of the inner protons in 24,
61 and 30, respectivelv, exhibit at 65.43, 65.17 and 64.79 in
65.43r H
(24)
' H
(61)
• CI 65.17
64.79f H
(30)
their NMR spectra. The compound with bridges having highest bond
order in this benzoannulated series gives the most shieldedV
i
inner proton, i.e., at 64.79 of compound 30.
(ii) UV spectra
The UV spectra of [2,2]cyclophanes are quite different from
those of simple alkyl benzenes and the main characteristic of the
spectra of the former is that there are usually absorption bands
at longer wavelength (when compared with simple alkyl benzenes).
These longer wavelength absorption bands have been termed the
cyclophane bands''. The position and the intensity of these
bands depend on the mean distance between the two benzene decks
and the deformation of the benzene rings.
The UV spectra of benzoannulated [2,2jmetaparacyclophanes
24, 30 and 61 as well as related [2,2]paracyclophanes 32, 34 and
35 have been recorded and they are represented in a scale of
log£ vs wavelength (nm) in figures 8, 9 and 10.
(24) (32)
(30) (34)
(61)
-CI
(35)
(220,4.65)
-(206.3.794
e
r
]
OJ
too
1—I
.(270.3. 18)
(300,2.24)
(311,2.13;
9nn 250 300 35C 400
(24)-
(32)
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 8 UV spectra of 24 and 32
•m'7.4. 77)
•(260,3.95)
(207,4.34
(266 ,3.42)] (339,2.86)
(310,2.49]
4
3
2
1
u
or-H
300 250 300 350 400
(30)
(34)
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 9 UV spectra of 30 and 34
-(222,4.74)
(266,3.60)
(235,3.25;(295.2.43
L
r
r
1
U)
fcCo
r~I
200 250 300 350 400
-CI
(35)
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 10 UV spectra of 61 and 35
V Conclusion
1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24) was synthesized both
179995. 19
by VBgtle-Boekelheide method'' and Cram s rearrangement
and 1,2-benzo~[2,2]metaparacyclophan-9-ene($£) was synthesized
22by the method of bromination and dehydrobromination of 24.
However, the third compound of our target molecules, namely,
1,2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (31) still eludesrVj
preparation. Nevertheless, its chlorinated derivative 61 was
19produced by the Cram's rearrangement. Due to the fact that the
starting material 35 for the rearrangement can only beW|
synthesized in small amount, the yield of the rearrangemnt is
very low and the manipulation of the reaction condition is not
easy, therefore, this reaction is not recommended for preparation
of large quantity of 61.
On tne other hand, we might prepare the 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-
[2,2]metaparacyclophane (31) starting from 30 according to scheme
XI. Bromination of 30 might give the dibromide 62.
Dehydrobromination of 62 with potassium ter t--butoxide might giveIAj
an intermediate acetylene 63 which might be trapped with furan to
form epoxide 64. Deoxygenation of 64 might lead to 31.
Scheme XI
Br2
(30)r r(62)
Br
Br
KOtBu
0
0
(64)
TiCl,4
LiAlH,4
NEt3
THF
(63)A A
(31)AiA.
48
VI EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
General
JolvenLs usea were redistilled or purified and dried by
standard methods. All evaporation of solvents of organic solution
were carried out by a rotatory evaporator in conjunction with a
water aspirator.
Proton NMR spectra were recorded on a Jeol C-60HL (60MHz)
spectrometer or on a Bruker Cryopec WM250 (250MHz) spectrometer.
Deuterated chloroform was used as solvent and 6 (ppm) was
measured from TMS which serves as an internal reference. Mass
spectra were recorded on a VG Micromass 7070E spectrometer. UV
spectra were-recorded on a Varian Superscan 3 using ethanol as
solvent. IR spectrum was recorded on a Perkin-Elmer PE-283
spectrometer.
Merck silica gel-60 F254 precoated on aluminium sheets were
used for TLC studies and Merck silica gel (70-230 mesh) was used
for column chromatography. Melting points were measured with hot-
stage microscope and were uncorrected.
P-Iodo-toluene (37 26)
Water (1950 ml) was allowed to mix with 2-toluidine (36)
(150 g 1.4 moles), and then concentrated sulfuric acid (1170 g)
was added. The mixture was cooled to -20'C (.acetone-dry ice
bath). A solution of sodium nitrite (102 g 1.47 moles) in water
(600 ml) was added. Keeping at -20'C, the-resulting mixture was
added in portions to a solution of potassium iodide (392 g 2.36
moles) and iodine (40 g 0.16 moles) in water (400 ml). After the
temperature was allowed gradually to rise to room temperature,
the mixture was warmed to 40 C and kept at this temperature with
stirring for 5 hrs. It was shaken with sodium thiosulfate
solution (0.6 N; 3x300 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with
chloroform (3x300 ml). The combined chloroform solution was
washed with sodium thiosulfate solution (0.6 N; 3x200 ml). It was
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated
and the residue was distilled under reduced pressure (70C 0.3-
0.5 mmHg) to give the crude product. Crystallization from ethanol
led to white crystals 37 (196 g; 64%): m.p. 34-35 C; b.p. 70 C
0.3-0.5 mmHg; 1H NMR, 6 2.25 (s, 3H, -CH3), 6.80-7.60 (m, 4H,
Ar-H); MS, me 218 (M+), 91 (M+-l).
4-methy1-2'-nitro biphenyl (39) and 4-methy1-2'-nitro biphenyl
ether (44)
To a stirring solution of p-iodo-toluene (37) (80 g; 0.37
moles) and o-nitro-benzoic acid (38) (102 g; 0.61 moles) in
quinoline (194 ml) at 155 °C was added rapidly copper (I) oxide
(29.1 g; 0.20 moles). After the violent reaction proceeded for 30
mins at 190-200 C, it was allowed to cooled to room temperature.
Ether (400 ml) was added to dilute the reaction mixture. The
precipitate formed was filtered. The ethereal solution was washed
with hydrochloric acid (2 N; 2x200 ml) and water (2x200 ml). It
was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. Quinoline was removed
and the orange-red crude product was distilled (110-140 'C 0.3-
0.5 mmHg) under reduced pressure. The distillate obtained was
chromatographed on silica gel (solvent, hexanesethy1 acetate:
251) and the orange-red fraction containing 4-methy1-2'-nitro
biphenyl (39) and 4-methy 1-2'-nitro biphenyl ether (4,4) (TLC
R:0.30-0.38; solvent,hexanesethyl acetate: 91) was collected
(4.7 g). It was used for further reaction without further
purification: b.p. 110-140 'C0. 3-0. 5 mmHg; NMR, 62.28, 2.30
(2s, 3H, -CH3), 6.90-8.00 (m, 8H, Ar-H); MS, me_ 229 (M+ of 44),
213 (M+ of 39).
252-Amino-4'-methyl biphenyl (40) and 2-amino-4'-methyl biphenyl
ether (45)
A spatula of Raney nickel was added to a solution of the
mixture of 4-methy1-2'-nitro biphenyl (39) and 4-methyl-2'-nitro
biphenyl ether (44) (1 g) in ethanol (8 ml). It was heated to
70C. Hydrazine hydrate (80%; 1 ml) was slowly added. After all
the nitrogen was evolved, an additional spatula of Raney nickel
was added. The mixture was stirred under reflux at 83'C for 3.5
hrs. It was cooled and filtered. The residue was washed with
chloroform. The organic and aqueous layers of the filtrate were
separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with chloroform
(3x30 ml). The combined organic solution was dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated and the
residue was chromatographed on silica gel (solvent, hexanesethyl
acetate: 251) to give a mixture of 2-amino-4'-methy1 biphenyl
(4$,) aRd 2-amino-4' -methyl biphenyl ether (45) (TLC R:0.15-0.23;
solvent, hexanes.ethyl acetate: 91) (0.64 g). It was used for
further reaction without additional purification: H NMR, 62.28,
2.30 (2s, 3H, -CH,), 3.65 (s, 2H, -NH2), 6.60-7.40 (m, 8H,
Ar-H); MS, me 183 (M+ of 45), 199 (M+ of 40).
2-Iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl (41) and 2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl
ether (46)
A mixture (6.2 g) containing 2-amino-4'-methyl biphenyl (40)
and 2-amino-4'-methyl biphenyl ether (45) was added to a mixture
of water (83 ml) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (9.5 ml). The
resulting mixture was stirred and cooled to 0 C. A cooled
solution (0C) of sodium nitrite (2.5 g; 0.036 moles) in water (6
ml) was added. To the resulting diazonium salt was added a
solution of potassium iodide (11 g; 0.066 moles) and iodine (0.23
g; 0.91 mmoles) in water (21 ml). The reaction mixture was
heated to 35'C. Chloroform (50 ml) was added. The organic layer
was separated and washed with sodium thiosulfate solution (0.6 N;
50 ml) and sodium hydroxide solution (5%; 50 ml) and water (50
ml). It was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was
evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel to
give 2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl (41) (2.4 g): H NMR (NMR-1),
62.35 (s, 3H, -CH3), 6.80-8.10 (m, 8H, Ar-H); MS, me 294 (M+),
167 (M+-l), 152 (M+-I-CH3) and 2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl ether
(46) (6.0 g): 1H NMR (NMR-2), 62.30 (s, 3H, -CH,), 6.70-8.00 (m,
8H, Ar-H); MS, me 310 (M+), 183 (M+-l), 168 (M+-I-CH3), 91
(CyHy); IR, 1021 cm (symmetric stretching of C-O-C), 1239 cm
(asymmetric stretching of C-O-C), 1469-1605 cm (stretching of
C-C), 2928 and 3072 cm (stretching of C-H); exact mass: calc'd
for C13H11I0 309.9856 found 309.9860.
3,4-Dimethy1-1,1':2',1-terphenyl (43)
A solution of 2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl (41) (0.9396 g; 3.2rVj
mmoles) in absolute ether (6 ml) was added slowly to a solution
of n-butyllithium (1.7 M in hexane; 2.2 ml, 3.74 mmoles) in ether
(3 ml) under nitrogen at O'C. It was stirred for 0.5 hr. Then, at
the same temperature, a solution of 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-l-one
() (0.3758 g; 3.42 mmoles) in ether (4 ml) was added. The
mixture was stirred under reflux for 3 hrs and sulfuric acid (2
M; 40 ml) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 3 days
and was extracted with ether (3x60 ml). The ethereal solution was
washed with sodium bicarbonate solution (5%; 60 ml), water (60
ml) and was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was
evaporated to give a residue, to which DDQ (0.6018 g; 2.65
mmoles) and toluene (12 ml) were added. The mixture was stirred
under reflux for 5 hrs. The insoluble components were filtered
and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was chromatographed
on silica gel (solvent, hexanes) to give compound 43 (0.2143 g;
26%): 1H NMR, 62.25, 2.30 (2s, 6H, -CH,), 7.00-7.50 (m, 12H,.
Ar-H); MS, me 258 (M+), 243 (M+-CH3), 228 (M+-2CH3).
3,4-Bis(bromomethy1)-1,1':2',1-terphenyl (25)f,
AIBN (small amount) was added to a stirring mixture of 3,4'1-
dimethyl-1,12',ln-terphenyl (43) (0.2143 g; 0.831 mmoles) andAj
NBS (0.3089 g; 1.74 mmoles) in absolute dichloromethane (10 ml).
The mixture was irradiated with a sunlamp (200 W) for 16 hrs. The
solvent was removed and the residue was chromatographed on
silica gel to give the dibrominated product 25 (0.3075 g; 90%)
as an oil: ~H NMR, 64.25 (s, 2H, CH2-), 4.38 (s, 2H,
6.90-7.36 (m, 12H, Ar-H); MS, me 418 (M++4), 416 (M++2), 414
(M+), 337 (M+-Br+2), 335 (M+-Br) and the monobrominated
compounds 50 and 51 (0.0197 g; 7%): H NMR, 6 2.25-2.30 (2s, 3H,rf rbrb
-CH3), 4.50 (s, 2H, -CH2-), 6.85-7.50 (m, 12H, Ar-H); MS, nj_e
338 (M++2), 336 (M+), 257 (M+-Br).
2 2l,2-Benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24)
rAJ
3,4M-Bis(bromomethyl)-1,1':2',1M-terpheny1 (25) (0.1260 g;
0.304 mmoles) in dry ether (30 ml) was added slowly to a solution
of phenyHithium (0.6 N; 4.6 ml, 2.76 mmoles) in dry ether (12
ml). It was stirred for 22 hrs. Then,diluted sulfuric acid (1 M;
40 ml) was added. The aqueous layer was extracted with ether
(3x30 ml). The combined ethereal solution was dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated. The
residue was chromatographed on silica gel (solvent,
hexanesbenzene: 91) to afford 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane
(24) (23.1 mg; 30%) which was recrystallized from benzene: m.p.
115-118'C (lit17 m.p. 118-119 'C); 1H NMR (NMR-3), «2.20-3.30 (m,
4H, -(Ct-j ABCD system, AB=' Jq=11.8Hz, Jb=6.5Hz,
Jbc=5.7Hz, Jbd=11.8Hz and JCD= 11.8Hz), 5.43 (s, 1H, Ar-H),
6.11-6.22 (m, 4H, Ar-H, AB system, JAB=8Hz, Jx=JBy=l•5Hz and
Jay=BX=' 6.80-7.17 (m) 3H, Ar-H, ABC system, b=JBq=7•5Hz and
Jac=0) 7.28-7.77 (m, 6H, Ar-H); UV (figure 8), nmlog e,
2063.79, 2902.52, 3002.24; MS me 256 (M+).; exact mass: calc'dV.
for 2qHb 256.1252, found 256.1228. Dimer 52 was also separated
(9.4 g; 12%): m.p. 103-105 °C (without recrystallization); H NMR
(NMR-4), 6 2.80-3.10 (m, 8H, -(CH2)2-), 6.40-7.50 (m, 24H, Ar-H);
MS me 512 (M+); exact mass: calc'd for C4qH32 512.2504, found
512.2497.
1 Q
Lewis acid promoted rearrangement of 1,2-benzo-[2,2]-
paracyclophane (32)'
A suspension of aluminium chloride (125 mg; 0.0938 mmoles)
in dichloromethane (2 ml) was saturated with hydrogen, chloride
gas (from cylinder, Merck) at 0'C. The resulting solution was
cooled to -10'C (acetone-dry ice bath). To this solution, 1,2-
benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane (32) (4 mg; 0.0156 mmoles) was added
and the mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 2 hrs.
The solution was poured into ice and water (5 ml) and was
extracted with chloroform (2x10 ml). The organic layer was washed
successively with hydrochloric acid (2 N; 10 ml) and saturated
sodium bicarbonate solution (10 ml). The organic solution was
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed.
The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (solvent, hexanes)
to furnish the starting material '32 (1.8 mg; 45%) and 1,2-benzo-
[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24) (0.9 mg; 22.5%). The physical and
spectroscopic data of 32 and 24 are identical with authenticrVl OOi
samples.
1,2-benzo-9-bromo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane and
1 71,2benzo-10bromo[2,2]metaparacyclophane mixture (55)
A A.
AIBN (small amount) was added to a mixture of 1,2-benzo-
[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24) (39.8 mg; 0.155 mmoles), NBS (73.4fj
mg; 0.412 mmoles) in dry dichloromethane (5 ml). The mixture was
irradiated with a sunlamp (200 W) for 12 hrs. The solvent was
evaporated and carbon tetrachloride (5 ml) was added. The
succinimide was filtered and the solvent of the filtrate was
removed. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel (solvent,
hexanesbenzene: 91) to afford the starting material 24OA,
(13.6 mg; 34.2%), the isomeric mixture 55 .and some
polybrominated products (TLC RiO.34, solvent, hexanesbenzene:
91) (14.8 mg): 1HNMR (NMR-6), 5 2.30-8.00 (m); MS me 496, 494,
492 (M+ of tribrominated product), _me_ 416, 414, 412 (M+ of
dibrominated product), me 336, 334 (M+ of 55).
? 91,2-Benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophan-9-ene (30)TY
A solution of potassium tert-butoxide (0.6136 g; 5.473
mmoles) in THF (5 ml) was added dropwisely to a solution of a
crude brominated cyclophanes 55 (18 mg) in THF (3 ml). TherVj
mixture was stirred for 18 hrs.Diluted hydrochloric acid (2 N; 20
ml) was added. The resulting solution was extracted with
dichloromethane (3x30 ml) and the organic extract was dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated and the
residue was chromatographed on silica gel (solvent,
hexanesbenzene: 91) to give 1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophan-
9-ene (30) (2.3 mg; 13%): m.p. 89-90'C; 1H NMR (NMR-7), 64.79
(s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.72, 7.22 (2d, 2H, olefinic H, AX system,
J=10.3Kz), 6.85-7.15 (m, 3H, Ar-H, ABC system, Jg=Jg,= 7. 5Hz,
JAc=°), 6.95 (s, 4H, Ar-H), 7.38-7.77 (m, 4H, Ar-H, ABCD
s y s t sm j AB~~BC~CD~• 4-H z? BD~AC~ AD~~ (figurG
nmlog e', 2074.34, 2603.95, 339,2.86; MS me_ 254 (M+); exact
mass: calc'd for 2014 254.1095 found 254.1099.
1 Q
Lewis acid promoted rearrangement of 1,2-benzo-[2,2Jparacyclo-
phan-9-ene (34)'
A suspension of aluminium chloride (9.6 mg; 0.29 mmoles) in
dry dichloromethane (2 ml) was saturated with hydrogen chloride
gas (from cylinder; Merck) at 0°C. It was cooled to -10 °C
(acetone-dry ice bath). To this solution was added a solution of
1,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophan-9-ene (34) (9.6 mg; 0.0378 mmoles)
in dichloromethane (0.5 ml). The mixture was stirred at the same
temperature for 2 hrs. It was then added to ice and water mixture
(10 ml). The organic phase was washed successively with diluted
hydrochloric acid (2 N; 20 ml), sodium bicarbonate solution (5%;
20 ml) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was
evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel
(solvent, hexanesbenzene: 91) to yield benzo[e]pyrene (56)j
(0.6 mg; 6.3%): m.p. 172.5°G (recrystallized from benzene)
(lit33a m.p. 178-179'C); 1H NMR (NMR-8), 67.77, 8.90 (m, 4H,
Ar-H, 22 system)j 8.05 (t, 2H, Ar-H), 8.06 (s, 2H, Ar-H),
8.20 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 8.92 (d, 2H, Ar-H); MS _me 252 (M+); exact
mass: calc'd for 2012 252.0939 found 252.0942.
9,12-dihydro-9,12-endoxo-5,8:13,16-dietheno-dibenzo-
cyclododecene (59)'
Freshly distilled furan (5 ml; 68.75 mmoles) was added to a
suspension of potassium t_er_t-butoxide (1.0313 g; 9.199 mmoles) in
THF (4 ml) at room temperature. To this stirring mixture, a
solution of 9,9-dibromo-l,2-benzo-[2,2]paracyclophane (58)'
(37 mg; 0.0898 mmoles) in THF (3 ml) was added dropwisely. The
mixture was stirred for 22 hrs. Diluted hydrochloric acid (2 N; 30
ml) was added. The resulting solution was extracted with ether
(3x30 ml) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent
was evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on silica gel
(solvent, benzene) to give the required product 59 (2.4 mg; 8.4
%): m.p. 205-207 'C (without recrys tallization); H NMR, 65.82 (s,
2H, methine-H), 6.12-6.70 (m, 8H, Ar-H, ABCD system), 7.40-7.59
(m, 4H, Ar-H, AA'BB' system), 7.49 (s, 2H, olefinic H); MS _m_e
320 (M+) and 9,10-dihydro-5,8:11,14-diethenobenzocyclododecene-9-
one (7.6 mg; 31.3%): m.p. 229-232 'C (without
recrystallization); H NMR, 63.88 (s, 2H, -CH2-), 6.63-6.75 (m,
8H, Ar-H), 7.44-7.67 (m, 4H, Ar-H); MS me 270 (M+), 242 (M+-
CO).
1,2:9,10-Dibenzo-[2,2]paracyclophane (35)
THF (5 ml) was added to titanium tetrachloride (0.1 ml;
0.855 mmoles) under nitrogen. Then, lithium aluminium hydride (20
mg; 0.530 mmoles) was added, which was followed by triethylamine
(34.8 mg; 0.348 mmoles) in THF (0.5 ml). The mixture was refluxed
for 0.5 hr. Then, 9 ,12-dihydro-9,12-enaoxo-5,8:13,16-dietheno-
dibenzocyclododecene (59) (2.4 mg; 0.0075 mmoles) in THF (2 ml)
was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2
hrs and at 60 'C for 15 mins. Saturated potassium carbonate
solution (30 ml) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred
for 3 hrs. It was extracted with dichloromethane C3x30 ml). -The
extracts were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent
was evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel
(solvent, benzene) to furnish 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-[2,2]
paracyclophane (3,5) (2.2 mg; 93.4%): m.p. 260-265 C (without
recrystallizatiori); ''H NMR, 66.65 (s, 8H, Ar-H), 7.44-7.69 (m,
8H, Ar-H); MS me 304 (M+).
19Lewis acid promoted rearrangement of 1,2:9,10-dibenzo-
[ 2, 2 ]paracyclophane (35)
A suspension of aluminium chloride (1.3 mg; 0.098 mmoles) in
dichloromethane (1 ml) was saturated with hydrogen chloride gas
(from cylinder; Merck) at O'C. It was cooled to -10'C (acetone-
dry ice bath). To this solution, a solution of 35 (4 mg; 0.0132
mmoles) in dichloromethane (0.5 ml) was added and the resulting
mixture was stirred for 3 hrs at the same temperature. The
solution was poured into ice and water mixture (5 ml) and the
organic phase was washed with diluted hydrochloric acid (2 N; 15
ml) and sodium bicarbonate solution (5%; 15 ml). The organic
layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent
was evaporated. The residue was chromatographed on silica gel
(solvent, hexanesbenzene: 91) -to give a chlorinated product 61
(0.1 mg): m.p. 208-210 'C (without recrystallizatiori); h NMR
(NMR-9), S 5.17 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.42 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 6.61-6.84 (m,
7H, Ar-H), 7.20-7.77 (m, 8H, Ar-H); UV (figure 10), nmlog c,
2353.25, 2952.43; MS me 340 (M++2), 338 (M+), 303 (M+-C1), 302
(M+-HC1); exact mass: calc'd for 3415! 338.0862 found
338.0857.
VII REFERENCES
1. Cram,D.J.; Steinberg,H. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1951, 73, 5691-5704.
2. Cyclophanes; Keehn,P.M.; Rosenfeld,S.M., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York, 1983; vol 1 and 2.
3. Topics in Current Chemistry; VBgtle,F.,Ed.: Springer-Verlag:
Berlin, 1983; vol 113.
4. Topics in Current Chemistry; VBgtle,F.;Ed.; Springer-Verlag:
Berlin, 1983; vol 115.
5. Cram,D.J.; Cram,J.M. Acc.Chem.Res. 1971, 4, 204-213.
6. Boekelheide,V. In Topics in Current Chemistry; VBgtle,F.,
Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1983; vol 113, pp87-143.
7. Shieh,C.F.; McNally,D.; Boyd,R.H. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 3653-
3665.
8. Boyd,R.H. Tetrahedron 1966, 22, 119-122.
9. a) Hefelfinger,D.T.; Cram,D.J. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1971, 93, 4767-
4772.
b) Hefelfinger,D.T.; Cram,D.J. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1970, 92, 1073-
1074.
c) Akabori,S.; Hayaski,S.; Nawa,M.; Shiomi,K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1969, 3727-3728.
10. Sherrod, S. A.; da Costa, R.L.; Barnes,R.A.; Beokelheide, V.
J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1974, 96, 1565-1577.
11. Boekelheide,V.; Anderson,P.H.; Hylton,T.A. J.Am.Chem.Soc.
1974, 96, 1558-1564.
12. VBgtle,F.; Neumann,P. Synthesis 1973, 85-103.
13. Boekelheide,V.; Anderson,P.H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 1207-
1208.
14. Boekelheide,V.; Tsai,C.H. J.Org.Chem. 1973, 38, 3931-3934.
15. Seebach.D.; Jones ,N.R.; Corey,E.J. J.Org.Chem. 1968, 33, 300-
305.
16. Hylton.T.; Boekelheide,V. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1968, 90, 6887-6888.
17. Wittek,H.; V8gtle,F. Chem.Ber. 1982, 115, 1363-1366.
18. a) Cram,D.J.; Helgeson,R.C.; Lock,D.; Singer,L.A. J.Am.Chem.
Soc. 1966, 88, 1324-1325.
b) Delton,M.H.; Gilman,R.E.; Cram,D.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971,
93, 2329-2330.
19. Hefelfinger,D.T.; Cram,D.J. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1971, 93, 4754
4766.
20. Gilman,R.E.: Delton,M.M.; Cram,D.J. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1972, 94,
2478-2482.
21. McCaulay,D.A.; Lien,A.P. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1952, 74, 6246-6250.
22. Jacobson,N.: Beokelheide,V. Angew.Chem.,Int.Ed.Engl. 1978
17,46-47.
23. Chan,C.W.; Wong,H.N.C. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1985, 107, 4790-4791.
24. Chan,C.W. Undergraduate Thesis, The Chinese University of
Hong Kong, 1985.
25. Hammerschmidt,E.; VUgtle,F. Chem.Ber. 1979, 112, 1785-1790.
26. Lucas,H.J.; Kennedy,E.R. Org.Syn.Coll.Vol. 1943, 2, 351-352.
27. Avran,M.; Mateescu,G. Infrared Spectroscopy; Wiley
Interscience: New York, 1972; p283.
28. Evans,J.C.W.; Allen,C.F.H. Org.Syn.Coll.Vol. 1943, 2, 517-
518.
29. a) Haenel ,M-.W.; Lintner,B.; Benn,R.; Ruf ihska, A.'; Schroth,G.;
Krllger,C.; Hirsch,S.; Irngartinger ,H.;. Schweitzer ,D.
Chem.Ber. 1985, 118, 4884-4906.
b) Boekelheide,V.; Galuszko,K.; Szeto,K.S. J. Am.Chem.Soc.
1974, 96, 1578-1581.
30. a) Cook,J.W.; Hewett,C.L. J.Chem.Soc. 1933, 398-405.
b) Barfield,H.; Grant,D.M.; Ikenberry,D. J.Am.Chem.Soc. 1975,rjrjrj
97_, 6956-6961.
c) Mitchell,R.H.; Yan,J.S.H.; Dingle,T.W. J.Am.Chem.Soc.
1982, 104, 2551-2559.
31. a) Nishiyama,K.; Hata,K.; Sato,T. Tetrahedron 1975, 31, 239-
244.
b) Sato,T.; Akabori,S.; Muto,S.; Hata,K. Tetrahedron 1968,
24, 5557-5567.
32. Mitchell,R.H. In Cyclophanes; Keehn,P.H.; Rosenfeld,S.M.3
Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1983; vol 1, pp241-310.
VIII SPECTRA
NMR-1
NMR-2
NMR-3
NMR-4
NMR-5
NMR-6
NMR-7
NMR-8
NMR-9
IR-1
2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl (41)
2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl ether (46)
1,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24)
dimer 52
Cram's rearrangement product-
l,2-benzo-[2,2]metaparacyclophane (24)
dibromide mixture 55
l,2-benzo-[_2,2 J me taparacyclophan-9 -ene (30;
Cram's rearrangement product-
benzo[e]pyrene (56)
Cram's rearrangement product-
chlorinated compound 61
2-iodo-4'-methyl biphenyl ether (46)
• NMR-1
.1
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
--NMR—2--::
'I
'0
e 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 nnm
NMR-3
chci
39
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
NMR-4
CHC13
3.3 3.0 2.7
8 7 6
CHC13
10 9 8 7 6 54 32 1 0
NMR-5
CHC13
8'- 7 6
£ 2
CHC1
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
NMR-6Br
i r iJ t rrrf, 0 o l r y
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 U
CHC13
NMR-7
chci3
8 7
''''' V 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
NMR-8
CHC1
9
r
8
r f
7
CHC10
TrT 1 1' r~~R~r~r~~l' T'' 6-1' 5 r'' r~~4~~r~~1' Q'
NMR-9
CI1C1
•CI
7.0 6.0 5.1
4.0 5.0 MICROMETERSi
6.0 7.0 8.0 P n 10 12 14 ie
IR-1
I
0
3000 2500 2000 1800 1600 1400 WAVENUMBER (CM'1) 1000 800