+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Team JADS 1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS Sean McNary John Yoshimura ENGR 5 - Lab 5.

Team JADS 1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS Sean McNary John Yoshimura ENGR 5 - Lab 5.

Date post: 22-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
24
Team JADS 1 The PFADS Competition Team JADS Sean McNary John Yoshimura ENGR 5 - Lab 5
Transcript

Team JADS 1

The PFADS Competition

Team JADS

Sean McNary

John Yoshimura

ENGR 5 - Lab 5

Team JADS 2

Outline

Problem Definition Design Process Design Process continued Results and Discussion Suggested Improvements Conclusions Acknowledgements

Team JADS 3

Introduction/Background

Problem: Design PFADS for UNICEF Parabolic Food Aid Delivery System

PFADS must deliver Food Aid Package to target location

Team JADS 4

Introduction/Background

PYTHON-INFESTED JUNGLE BOUNDARY

4 in

4 ft 8 ft

STARTLINE

FAP TARGET SPOT

6 ft 2 in

3.5 ft

10 ft 10 ft

Team JADS 5

Constraints

PFADS: Weight < 10 lbs. Length < 18 in. Width < 18 in. Height < 18 in. Cost < $20.00 Built using no pre-constructed materials

Team JADS 6

Criteria

Hit target 10 feet away and maximize accuracy

Go over 6’ 2’’ high wall Device launches when trigger hits barrier Complete device must remain behind

barrier Minimize Weight (< 10 lbs.) Minimize Volume (< 18’’x18’’x18’’)

Team JADS 7

Project Objectives

Design and construct a PFADS using the design process.

Practice Teamwork

Create and Give a Formal Presentation

Team JADS 8

Preliminary IdeasPreliminary Ideas

Catapult Modified Catapult

Rat Trap Sling-Shot

Team JADS 9

Refinement

Pros Simple Release

Mechanism Weight of Launcher

Cons Accuracy of launch Low release angle FAP launch distance Total Volume of Device

Catapult

Team JADS 10

Refinement

Pros Large, Stable Base Smaller Launch Arm Simple Trigger Weight of Launcher

Cons FAP Launch Distance Launch Accuracy Launcher Volume

Modified Catapult

Team JADS 11

Refinement

Pros Launcher Volume Launcher Weight

Cons FAP Launch Distance Launch Accuracy Incorporating Rat Trap

in Launcher Low Launch Angle

Rat Trap

Team JADS 12

Refinement

Pros FAP Launch Distance Launch Accuracy

Cons Launcher Volume Launcher Weight

Sling-shot

Team JADS 13

Decision/Implementation Designs 1-3 have similar launch mechanisms

Steep launch angle reduces power of catapult Sling shot needed improvement to guide

FAP through sling shot (Frame with Rails). Sling Shot

selected to be

constructed.

Team JADS 14

Construction and Testing

First Design: Weight: 9 lbs. Height: 17.5 inches

Testing: FAP launched over wall PFADS flipped over wall

Problems: High center of gravity Rolled down ramp fast

Team JADS 15

Construction and Testing

Solutions To prevent PFADS flipping over wall:

Reduced Volume and Weight of PFADS to lower center of gravity

Added brace with foam paddingRemoved wheels & added skis to reduce

speed

Team JADS 16

Final Mechanism (Side View)

Total Weight: 7 lbs. Key Features:

PVC frame with rails to guide FAP

Metal rod unhooks gate latch to release FAP

Skis to slide down ramp Foam Bumper Adjustable Launch

Angle

Team JADS 17

Results/DiscussionFAP launched straight and landed on

target, but rolled away.Trial Distances: 4’ and 3.25’

First FOM- 92.26 Second FOM- 101.63

Final Figure of Merit: 96.94Finished 4th

Team JADS 18

Results/Discussion

AdvantagesLaunched FAP over wall consistentlyPFADS remained behind ramp barrier

DisadvantagesWeight and VolumeFAP hit target but rolled away

Team JADS 19

Suggested Improvements

Use Lighter Materials Construct frame using lighter material such as

aluminum

Improve Launch Angle Mechanism Don’t use nails

Team JADS 20

Conclusions

Key Criteria and Constraints Launch FAP over 6’2” wall to target with

accuracy PFADS Mechanism

Weight < 10 lbs. Volume < 18” x 18” x 18” Use No Pre-constructed Materials

Team JADS 21

Conclusions

Final Design Used Sling-shot

mechanism to launch FAP Lighter and smaller than

original design Trigger: Metal rod pushed

gate hook off an eye bolt PFADS remained behind

barrier Launched FAP over wall

consistently

Team JADS 22

Conclusions

Mechanism Performance Successfully Launched During Both Trials

4’ and 3.25’ Finished in 4th Place

Total FOM- 96.94 FAP was expected to hit and stop on target FAP actually hit target but rolled away

Team JADS 23

Conclusions

ImprovementsReduce weight and size of PFADS Improve Launch Angle Mechanism Improve accuracy by preventing FAP

from rolling away from target

Team JADS 24

Acknowledgements

Team JADS would like to thank the following individuals for their time and help:

Professor Saviz Professor Schultz Bob Pollard Adrian the Machinist ENGR 5 Introduction to Engineering

Course Manual


Recommended