411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov Technical Advisory Committee MEETNG AGENDA The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Order, which suspends certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. TAC members will be teleconferencing into the TAC meeting. Members of the public who wish to listen to the TAC meeting may do so via the following teleconference call-in number and access code: Call-in number: 312-757-3121 Access code: 689-734-461 Link: https://www.gotomeet.me/scta-rcpa Instructions for Public Comment: Please submit any comments in writing to Seana Gause at [email protected]by 12:30pm on March 26 (please identify the agenda item related to your comment and indicate whether your comment should be read aloud or only submitted for the record). March 26, 2020 – 1:30 p.m. Sonoma County Transportation Authority Meeting to be held remotely via GotoMeeting. Information provided above. ACTION ITEMS 1. Introductions 2. Public Comment 3. Approval of Minutes, February 27, 2020* DISCUSSION/ACTION 4. SB-1 Local Partnership Program – Proposed Project Nomination: Hearn Avenue Interchange* 5. Measure M DISCUSSION 5.1 Measure Reauthorization Update: Draft Expenditure Plan** INFORMATION ITEMS 6. Measure M Invoicing/Obligation Status* 7. SB743/VMT Update* https://arcg.is/18mvGy 8. Regional Information Update 8.1 Inactive Federal Obligation Status*: project sponsors should be prepared to address status of inactive obligations at the meeting: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/projects/inactive-projects Currently Inactive: Petaluma, County of Sonoma, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit and Rohnert Park; County of Sonoma and Cloverdale pending 9. SCTA/RCPA DRAFT Board Agenda, April 13, 2020** 10. Other Business / Comments / Announcements 11. Adjourn *Materials attached. **Materials distributed separately 1
Transcript
411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov
Technical Advisory Committee
MEETNG AGENDA The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Order, which suspends certain requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. TAC members will be
teleconferencing into the TAC meeting. Members of the public who wish to listen to the TAC meeting may do so via the following teleconference call-in number and access code:
Instructions for Public Comment: Please submit any comments in writing to Seana Gause at [email protected] by 12:30pm on March 26 (please identify the agenda item related to your comment
and indicate whether your comment should be read aloud or only submitted for the record).
March 26, 2020 – 1:30 p.m. Sonoma County Transportation Authority
Meeting to be held remotely via GotoMeeting. Information provided above. ACTION ITEMS
1. Introductions
2. Public Comment
3. Approval of Minutes, February 27, 2020* DISCUSSION/ACTION
4. SB-1 Local Partnership Program – Proposed Project Nomination: Hearn Avenue Interchange*
6. Measure M Invoicing/Obligation Status* 7. SB743/VMT Update*
https://arcg.is/18mvGy
8. Regional Information Update
8.1 Inactive Federal Obligation Status*: project sponsors should be prepared to address status of inactive obligations at the meeting: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/projects/inactive-projects
Currently Inactive: Petaluma, County of Sonoma, Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit and Rohnert Park; County of Sonoma and Cloverdale pending
The next S C T A meeting will be held April 13th, 2020 The next TAC meeting will be held on April 23rd 2020
Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.scta.ca.gov
DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format, or that requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation.
SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Technical Advisory Committee after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 411 King St, Santa Rosa, during normal business hours.
TAC Voting member attendance – (6 Month rolling 2019) Jurisdiction September October Nov/Dec January February March
Cloverdale Public Works
Cotati Public Works
County of Sonoma DHS*
County of Sonoma PRMD*
County of Sonoma Regional Parks*
County of Sonoma TPW* (by phone)
Healdsburg Public Works
Petaluma Public Works & Transit
Rohnert Park Public Works (by phone)
Santa Rosa Public Works**
Santa Rosa Transit**
Sebastopol Public Works (by phone)
SMART
Sonoma County Transit*
Sonoma Public Works
Windsor Public Works
*One Vote between all **One Vote between all NB: No meeting held in July 2019
2
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES
Meeting Notes of February 27, 2020
ITEM
1. Introductions
Meeting called to order at 1:30p.m. by Chair Larry Zimmer.
Committee Members: Larry Zimmer, Chair, City of Healdsburg; Steve Urbanek, Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works; Craig Scott, City of Cotati; Jeff Stutsman, City of Petaluma; Nancy Adams, City of Santa Rosa; Henry Mikus, City of Sebastopol; Birittany Lobo, County of Sonoma – DHS; Vanessa Garrett, City of Rohnert Park; Eric Janzen, City of Cloverdale; Michelle Fajardo, City of Sonoma; Joanne Parker, SMART.
Gust: Steve Birdlebough, Sonoma County Transportation and Land Use Coalition.
Staff: Seana Gause; James Cameron; Chris Barney, Drew Nichols; Janet Spilman; Dana Turrey; Kiara Ryan.
2. Public Comment
N/A
3. Approval of Minutes, January 23, 2020 – ACTION
Approved as submitted.
4. TFCA/TDA3
4.1. TFCA FYE 2021 Call for Projects
Dana Turrey presented on this annual program and the FYE 2021 Call for Projects. This program is funded via a fee on vehicle registration.
The total funding this cycle is higher than in previous years due to a project that was cancelled.
Furthermore, this program also has a two-part distribution: one “off the top” portion that is
guaranteed for transit operators, and the second being a competitive portion for the jurisdictions.
The applications are due on March 9 and there are a variety types of projects that can be funding. These categories were described to the committee.
4.2. TDA3 Call for Projects
Daana Turrey announced the TDA3 Call for Projects. This is an annual program for bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The funding for this program is a distributed based on population. If the funding is not used in a particular year, it will be rolled over into future years. Furthermore, jurisdictions are able to request funding up to two years in advance for their allocation. Applications are due on March 16th.
Lastly, a resolution from the jurisdictions are required and are due on April 27th.
With the TDA funds, SCTA does the call for projects and approve the projects. SCTA then submits the projects to MTC for their management.
3
5. SB 743/VMT Update
Chris Barney updated the committee on the Travel Model validation and VMT. The travel model validation is complete and is updated to the base year of 2015. Initial results are looking good.
Looking at VMT in this detail is new and quality control and additional validations will be needed going forward.
Staff will be reviewing data from the Travel Behavior Study (mobile device data) with Fehr & Peers and do expect the numbers to change as work to capture the full length of trips is completed.
Furthermore, there was a request from the planners for a “Cheat sheet” providing a detailed description of each of the fields in the VMT summary sheet that has been provided.
Nancy Adams asked on the source of population data and if it is based within the city limits.
Mr. Barney responded it is based on the sphere of influence, and not within the city limits.
Mr. Barney further spoke on the VMT map and traffic analysis zones. Staff will be working on a FAQ describing these maps.
Regarding SB743 compliance, the final SB 743 White Paper is complete and has been sent out to planning and public works staff as a resource. Fehr & Peers and SCTA staff drafted the white paper. The white paper includes about 20 pages of narrative on SB 743, screening criteria, discuses VMT forecasts, and significant and adopted thresholds throughout California. Policy language from San Jose was attached as an example.
The committee further discussed VMT implementation the metrics poised to be used
6. Travel Behavior Study
Chris Barney updated the committee on the Travel Behavior Study (TBS). The final report is now complete and has been uploaded on the SCTA website. The report includes 200 pages of charts, tables, and informational data.
Mr. Barney provided a quick overview of the contents in this study.
Now that the TBS is complete, staff will be working on other model improvements and prioritizing looking at out of county/cross county trip lengths for VMT summaries.
Concurrently, Fehr & Peers are working on including weekends to the travel model, improving visitor and tourism travel, and will be enhancing winery/agricultural travel.
7. Long Range Planning
Janet Spilman updated the committee on the Long-Range Planning, Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP).
Ms. Spilman spoke on the process in the big picture. MTC puts out the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The RTP is also part of Plan Bay Area (PBA) with a horizon year of 30 years. The Plan is updated every four years and by having projects in the RTP makes them eligible for funding when available. If the project is not represented in the investment list, it will be hard to get into the TIP.
MTC have layered on metrics onto the projects they want to perform for all of the elements of PBA, including cost benefits and GHG reduction goals.
Furthermore, MTC will be analyzing large projects ($250 million or more) for air quality conformity.
Ms. Spilman encouraged the committee to make use of programmatic categories.
4
A list of projects that were submitted from a Call for Projects in the previous summer were provided to the committee. This list will be submitted to MTC and the projects received are represented in the two categories.
Nancy Adams asked how does this relate to the local measure and are the project lists talking to each other.
Seana Gause responded that SCTA asked jurisdictions to submit projects for the CTP and RTP that would help to inform the local measure.
Ms. Adams commented further regarding the Hearn Interchange project, updated thee funding number, specifically construction contract to $28 million.
Joanne Parker asked when will the RTP take effect.
Ms. Spilman responded in 2021.
Ms. Parker further commented on the SMART project listed must be in Plan and that SMART to Cloverdale has been submitted for the plans.
Steve Birdlebough commented on a portion of SMART’s right-of-way that is in Sonoma County from Blackpoint to Napa Junction and suspects within the next 30 years will likely be interests in developing the connection between SMART and Capitol Corridor.
The Sonoma County Transportation and Land Use Coalition has suggested this to be include in the planning process.
Ms. Parker responded that this is in the MTC’s planning venue, not in the countywide plan.
Larry Zimmer noted that council members may not fully understand programmatic categories and for the committee to help ensure their council members understand this category.
8. SB-1 Local Partnership Program
Seana Gause reminded the committee of the implementation schedule for both the formulaic and competitive programs.
Nancy Adams commented on the City of Santa Rosa SB-1 formulaic project that is under construction now.
9. Measure M
9.1. Measure M Invoicing/Obligation Status
This is a standard item on the agenda. Invoicing is required at minimum every six months.
9.2. Maintenance of Effort annual reporting
James Cameron spoke on the Maintenance of Effort (MOE). This MOE is ensuring jurisdictions are maintaining their commitment, not supplanting funds. All have submitted for FY 19.
Sonoma (city) and Windsor are the outliers that exceed the countywide MOE 2.8%.
In the past, the TAC has recommended to the SCTA Board of Directors to look at compliance as an aggregate.
9.3. Maintenance of Effort Policy Update
James Cameron presented in the policy updates to the Maintenance of Effort.
The concept here is to update the MOE currently implemented as report.
Policy 14 adopted by the SCTA Board of Director in 2011 and SB-1 has an MOE requirement built in using FY 2010, 2011, and 2012 as the base years.
The Citizen’s Advisory Committee expressed interest to see a more robust MOE when the economy is strong.
Mr. Cameron noted that comments from the previous meeting on this topic were incorporated into the updated MOE and made aware to the committee the proposed changes to the MOE.
5
Staff are asking the TAC to approve the policy as written, or for remaining comments.
Eric Janzen move for approval, Larry Zimmer seconded. The committee approved of the MOE policy changes.
9.4. Measure M Reauthorization Ad Hoc Update
James Cameron updated the committee on the local measure reauthorization. A handout illustrating an update to the strawman was provided; the only edit includes “Build pathways” to include bicycle pathways.
Mr. Cameron also updated the committee on the Measure M commitments. If approved by voters, the new measure would take effect April 1, 2021 and there will be existing contracts, agreements to be honored through 2025.
Joanne Parker commented on the 5% in Measure M allocated to SMART, expressing concern with an end date of Measure M in 2021 and SMART’s expectation of Measure M funding through 2024.
9.5. Measure M LSR/LBT Annual Allocation Estimates
Seana Gause included for the record. All jurisdictions have received these figures.
10. Regional Information Update – Discussion
10.1. Inactive Federal Obligation Status*
This is a standard item on the agenda. Any jurisdiction on the list is expected to expedite remediation to remove projects from the list.
MTC has requested information from each jurisdiction on their methodology and best practices to have these projects removed from the list.
Seana Gause requested information from Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works, Rohnert Park, and Petaluma.
10.2. Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) and Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10 Reminder and check in
Seana Gause recalled the previous discussion on whether to issue an RFP for consultant services for judications interested in participating, with SCTA issuing an RFP.
Ms. Gause commented further on a proposal for developing a working group.
A draft of the RFP was made available to the committee for their review and comments. Comments and a nomination for the working group are due March 13, as well as available dates for a potential conference call discussion of the working group.
The committee held a lengthy discussion on the contents of the RFP.
11. SCTA/RCPA DRAFT Board agenda, February 10, 2020
This is provided to the committee for their interest on related items to be presented to the SCTA Board of Directors.
Staff expect a robust discussion at the meeting on February 10th.
12. Other Business / Comments / Announcements – Discussion
Staff Report To: SCTA Technical Advisory Committee
From: Seana L. S. Gause, Senior – Programming and Projects
Item: SB-1 Local Partnership Program Competitive (LPP(C)) – Proposed Project Nomination: Hearn Avenue
Date: March 26, 2020
Issue:
Shall the TAC recommend the proposed project nomination for approval to the SCTA Board of Directors?
Background:
SCTA issued a call for projects for the Road Recovery and Accountability Act (SB-1) Local Partnership Competitive Program on February 3, 2020. The Local Partnership Program provides funding to regional transportation agencies in which voters have approved taxes dedicated solely to transportation improvements. The minimum program amount is $2 Million and the maximum is $25 Million. SCTA, as the taxing authority, is the eligible recipient of this funding program. The program requires a 1:1 match of local funds for the project in order to be eligible. It is a very competitive statewide program. Cycle 1 was over subscribed by almost three times the amount available.
SCTA received one application as a result of the call for projects. The City of Santa Rosa submitted an application for the Hearn Avenue Interchange project which is linked below.
The City of Santa Rosa requests $14 Million from the program for construction and construction support funding. The City has $3.45 existing programming for the Hearn Avenue Interchange Project in Measure M. The SCTA Board passed a resolution of support (SCTA2019-012) on September 9, 2019 to provide the additional matching funds to the Hearn Avenue Interchange Project from the Measure M Local Streets Projects Program should the project be successful in receiving Local Partnership Program funds.
This project has been reviewed by staff and meets the eligibility requirements of the program.
The California Transportation Commission staff will make recommendations for grant awards to projects in November 2020, and the Commission will approve projects in December. If successful the current schedule would open the new overpass at the end of 2023.
Policy Impacts:
None, it is within existing Policy for SCTA to nominate and submit projects in this program to leverage Measure M funds.
Staff recommends that the TAC recommend the proposed project nomination for approval to the SCTA Board of Directors.
8
Go Sonoma Act Better Transportation for All of Sonoma County
Draft Expenditure Plan CTP Based Recommendation
Sonoma County Transportation Authority - March 2020
3/25/2020 2:14 PM
I. EXPENDITURE PLAN SUMMARY New transportation investment is needed in our community. Without it, we will experience more traffic, increased greenhouse gas emissions and poorly maintained streets that leads to time away from our family and friends, bad air quality, increased costs for car maintenance and impacts to our climate. This plan benefits everyone who lives and works in Sonoma County. Through a public process we have developed a plan that shows how we will fix local streets, improve transportation corridors, increase bus transit service, and improve safety for cyclists, pedestrians and drivers. Without increasing the current tax rate, more than twice as much money will be dedicated to local roads, bus service and bike projects and cannot be taken away for other purposes. The new investment plan will include four programs in two categories:
A. Fix roads, fill potholes, improve traffic Smooth & maintained roads 38% Move traffic & improve safety 27%
B. Improve alternatives to cars, fight climate change Increase bus service, affordability, & first/last mile connections 23% Build bikeways & pathways 12%
The Go Sonoma Act will continue, for 20 years, the ¼-cent sales tax currently dedicated to transportation.
9
2
II. OUR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM VISION AND GOALS The Go Sonoma Act is needed now in order to meet our transportation vision and goals and ensure key projects can be planned and built without delays. Since most of the projects identified in Measure M have been completed or are under way, a continuation of a local and reliable source of funding now will result in more matching funds for new improvements coming on line sooner. VISION: Connecting people, places and goods as we transition our transportation network to zero-emissions by 2050. Our guiding principles are to improve safety, equity and quality of life. GOALS: Our transportation system should be:
1. Connected and Reliable: Deliver a seamless network that allows people to use a variety of transportation types easily, affordably and dependably.
2. Safe and Well Maintained: Provide safe and well-maintained transportation
infrastructure.
3. Community Oriented and Place-Based: Implement place-based transportation projects, tailored to urban, suburban and rural communities that will improve local mobility.
4. Zero Emissions: Provide zero-emission transportation opportunities that meet diverse community needs, improve health and enhance quality of life.
III. GO SONOMA ACT EXPENDITURE PLAN The Go Sonoma Act translates the SCTA goals into investments for specific programs in four program categories. Each program category will receive a percentage share of sales tax revenues, currently estimated at $26 million annually. The program allocates 1% of the revenue for administration and audits. BALLOT QUESTION: Without raising taxes, shall the Sonoma County Transportation Authority implement the Go Sonoma Act to repair potholes; reduce congestion; make biking and walking safer; expand local bus service; reduce greenhouse gas emissions; improve evacuation routes; and enhance transportation services for students and seniors by continuing, for 20 years, the current ¼-cent sales tax dedicated to transportation, providing approximately $26 million annually?
10
3
A. Fix Roads, Fill Potholes, Improve Traffic – 65% SMOOTH & MAINTAINED ROADS Fixing potholes and making our roads smooth to drive and ride on is a central focus of the Go Sonoma Act. Approximately $9.9 million annually (or 38% of the sales tax revenue) will be used by cities and the County to fix existing roads and keep them well maintained. All projects will take into consideration bicycle and pedestrian needs, traffic calming, intelligent transportation system technology, construction methods that reduce emissions, and appropriate safety measures. These components of a road project are eligible for sales tax revenue. This program will help achieve the transportation system goals of: 1) Connected and Reliable, 2) Safe and Well Maintained, and 3) Community Oriented and Place Based. Funds for this program will be allocated by a 50% population/50% road mile formula and local governments must maintain their existing commitments of local funds for transportation purposes. Below is a chart that estimates how much each jurisdiction can anticipate receiving annually.
Jurisdiction Formula Estimated Annual Sales Tax Funding Population /
Road Mile Split Cloverdale 1.59% $157,393 Cotati 1.27% $125,580 Healdsburg 2.18% $215,865 Petaluma 9.78% $966,615 Rohnert Park 6.24% $616,221 Santa Rosa 28.15% $2,781,097 Sebastopol 1.28% $126,852 Sonoma 1.84% $181,829 Windsor 4.61% $455,837 County 43.04% $4,252,710 Total 100% $9,880,000
MOVE TRAFFIC & IMPROVE SAFETY In addition to fixing local roads, the Go Sonoma Act will provide approximately $7.0 million (or 27% of the sales tax revenue) for projects that get traffic moving and improve safety. Moving people and goods around Sonoma County means making changes to our roadway system, providing alternatives and using technology to ensure reliability and safety. Projects will compete for the funds in this program based on the following criteria:
• Improve the flow of traffic with operational projects such as interchange improvements, traffic signals, turn lanes, or roundabouts
11
4
• Use best practices for bikeway design on city streets including pedestrian improvements and transit elements on roadway projects in cities
• Show improvements to safety for travelers of all modes • Improve connections within and between communities • Target high traffic areas with right-sized solutions that have regional benefit • Maximize the movement of people and reduce travel time • Has clear local support through a resolution of the local governing Board • Be cost effective and leverage other grants above the required match when possible • Address resiliency • Are included in a local general plan and the SCTA’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan
All projects will require environmental review, engineering and matching funds before construction can begin. All projects will take into consideration bicycle and pedestrian needs, traffic calming, intelligent transportation system technology and system implementation, and appropriate safety measures. This program will help achieve the transportation system goals 1) Connected and Reliable, 2) Safe and Well Maintained, and 3) Community Oriented and Place Based Projects included in Moving Forward 2050, our Comprehensive Transportation Plan, is located here: <link to CTP Measure list of priority road projects>. B. Improve Alternatives to Cars , Fight Climate Change – 35%. INCREASE BUS SERVICE, AFFORDABILITY & CONNECTIONS FOR FIRST/LAST MILE Funding for local transit improvements in the Go Sonoma Act will expand and enhance local bus operations to provide a more reliable service that works for more people. This program includes maintenance of existing bus service, increased bus frequencies and extended hours of operations, and a community benefit program to provide free rides for students and seniors. Increased bus frequencies and extended hours of operations should be prioritized where routes make first and last mile connections to major bus transit hubs, schools and rail stations. Approximately $6 million (or 23% of sales tax revenue) annually is dedicated to this program. Of that amount, 3% annually is dedicated to community benefit programs that support first/last mile and commuter programs to be managed by SCTA. Below is a chart estimating how much each category and each Transit Agency can expect from the measure annually:
12
5
Operators Service Area
Population %
Service Continuity*
10%
Service Expansion
8%
Student / Senior Rides
up to 2%** Petaluma Transit 12.43% $323,248 $258,598 Reimbursement of
costs Santa Rosa CityBus 35.08% $912,019 $729,615 Reimbursement of
costs Sonoma County Transit
52.49% $1,364,733 $1,091,787 Reimbursement of costs
100.00% $2,600,000 $2,080,000 $520,000 *The 2004 Measure M Bus Service program is now considered exisiting service but will be continued in the new measure **Remainder, if any, to be distributed by population formula to Service Expansion This program will help achieve the transportation system goals 1) Connected and Reliable, 2) Safe and Well Maintained, 3) Community Oriented and Place Based, and 4) Zero Emissions BUILD BIKEWAYS AND PATHWAYS This program will better separate bikes from cars and make it easier to bike and walk. It includes building new infrastructure for bicycles and pedestrians that will increase overall safety, close critical gaps in existing routes, and promote the use of active transportation through community benefit programs to support safety education and encouragement like Safe Routes to School and Vision Zero. In addition, numerous local road improvement projects will include improved bicycle lanes striping and sidewalk improvements. Approximately $3.1 million (or 12% of sales tax revenue) annually is dedicated to this program and will be used for bicycle and/or pedestrian projects that compete based on the criteria below. Of the total annual amount, 1% is dedicated annually to community benefit programs that support safety education and encouragement.
• Demonstrate the potential to shift from cars to active transportation measured by a reduction in vehicle miles traveled
• Use best practices for bikeway design, considering appropriate facilities that maximize use and safety
• Implement safety improvement priorities identified through Vision Zero, a plan to prevent all road deaths and serious injuries
• Design for all ages and abilities This program will help achieve the transportation system goals 1) Connected and Reliable, 2) Safe and Well Maintained, 3) Community Oriented and Place Based, and 4) Zero Emissions
13
6
IV. OVERSIGHT AND ADMINISTRATION The implementation of the Go Sonoma Act will be the responsibility of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority. The SCTA is composed of twelve elected officials; a representative from each of the nine cities in Sonoma County and three members of the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. The SCTA will be responsible for developing and updating a strategic plan to guide allocation decisions. The SCTA will develop the initial strategic plan by December 31, 2023 and prepare and update it at least every five years during the term of the plan. The Citizens Advisory Committee established under the Ordinance No. 1 that created the SCTA will serve as an independent oversight body that will advise the SCTA on the administration of the Go Sonoma Act and report to the public via annual audits of the Act and annual reports on progress. The SCTA will work closely and cooperatively with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on programming state and federal grants to match funding from the Go Sonoma Act for programs and projects. These partnerships will help to maximize the state and federal funds that can be leveraged with a local source of funds and to deliver projects in a timely manner. V. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES The Go Sonoma Act will begin on April 1, 2025 and will end on March 31, 2045. Environmental reporting, review and approval procedures as provided for under the National Environmental Policy Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, or other applicable laws will be adhered to as a prerequisite to the implementation of any project. Use of the retail transactions and use tax under this Transportation Expenditure Plan will be subject to the following restrictions:
1. The tax proceeds must be spent for the purposes of funding the transportation
programs and projects as allowed in the Go Sonoma Act and may not be used for other purposes.
2. In accordance with California Public Utilities Code Section 131100, the tax proceeds
will be used to supplement, and may not be used to replace, existing local property tax or other local revenues used for transportation purposes.
3. The tax proceeds will be expended in Sonoma County. 4. The SCTA is charged with a fiduciary duty in administering the tax proceeds in
accordance with the applicable laws and this Go Sonoma Act. Receipt of tax
14
7
proceeds may be subject to appropriate terms and conditions as determined by the SCTA in its reasonable discretion, including, but not limited to, the right to require recipients to execute funding agreements and the right to audit recipients’ use of the tax proceeds.
Actual tax proceeds may be higher or lower than estimated in this Go Sonoma Act. The Go Sonoma Act expenditure plan is based on the percentage distributions to each Program Category and the dollar values included are estimates only. Actual tax proceeds will be programmed annually in accordance with the percentage distributions in the Go Sonoma Act expenditure plan. The Sonoma County Transportation Authority will prepare a Strategic Plan prior to December 31, 2023, for review by the SCTA Board and the CAC. It will identify funding prioritization criteria consistent with the goals and objectives of the 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the Go Sonoma Act for Sonoma County expenditure plan. The Strategic Plan will include general procedures for project sponsors to initiate a project and identify an implementation schedule and the programming of funds based on successful calls for projects. The Strategic Plan will include the evaluation criteria for prioritization of projects and will include the evaluation criteria for reallocation of tax proceeds that become available pursuant to Section V-F and V-G below. The Strategic Plan will be updated at least every five years during the life of the Go Sonoma Act. The SCTA is authorized to bond for the purposes of advancing the commencement of or expediting the delivery of transportation programs or projects. The SCTA may issue limited tax bonds, from time to time, to finance any program or project in the Go Sonoma Act as allowed by applicable law and as approved by the SCTA, and the maximum bonded indebtedness shall not exceed the 20 year amount of proceeds of this retail transactions and use tax, estimated to be $850 million in 2020 dollars. Such bonds will be payable solely from the proceeds of the retail transactions and use tax and may be issued any time before expiration of the tax.
15
scta.ca.gov
CTP: Proposed Measure ProjectsMarch 2020
1Revised 3/25/202016
scta.ca.gov
Proposed Measure Project Cost Totals by Sponsor
2Revised 3/24/2020
$- $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900
Cost ($M)
Smooth and maintained roads Move traffic and improve safety Build bikeways and pathways17
scta.ca.gov
Proposed Measure Project Cost Totals by Sponsor – Transit Only
3Revised 3/25/2020
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Petaluma Transit Santa Rosa CityBus SCTA Sonoma County Transit
Cost ($M)
18
scta.ca.gov
Proposed Measure Project Cost Totals by Sponsor
4Revised 3/25/2020
0100200300400500600700800
Cost ($M)
Smooth and maintained roads Move traffic and improve safety
Build bikeways and pathways Increase bus service
19
scta.ca.gov
CTP Priority Project Needs for New Measure through 2045 ($M)
5Revised 3/25/2020
$1,314.3
$942.9
$427.5
$455.0 Smooth and maintained roads (42%)
Move traffic and improve safety (30%)
Build bikeways and pathways (14%)
Increase bus service (14%)
Note: 14% for “increase bus service” excludes 2004 Measure M levels of commitment20
scta.ca.gov
CTP Priority Project Needs for New Measure through 2045 ($M)Adjusted to carry forward Measure M 10% for service continuity
6Revised 3/25/2020
38%
27%
12%
23%Smooth and maintained roads (38%)
Move traffic and improve safety (27%)
Build bikeways and pathways (12%)
Increase Bus Service (23%)
21
scta.ca.gov
Cloverdale
7Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
$11.6
$98.0
$1.6 Cost by Project Type ($M)
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $11.6 2024-2044Highway 116 Cotati Corridor Improvements $15.0 1 2025La Plaza Reunification $15.0 5 2030Old Redwood Hwy rehab - Plaza to Gravenstein Hwy $8.0 3 2022US 101/Highway 116 North Bound On-Ramp Improvements $10.0 8 2035US 101/Railroad Avenue Improvements. $40.0 2 2030US 101/West Sierra Avenue South Bound Off-Ramp Improvements $10.0 6 2035West Cotati Avenue Sidewalks $1.6 7 TBD
Total $111.2
23
scta.ca.gov
Healdsburg
9Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
$34.5
$32.2
$12.8
Cost by Project Type ($M)
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $34.5 2024-2044Dry Creek Move traffic and improve safetys $6.0 1 TBDGrove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation - Complete Streets $2.5 9 TBDHealdsburg Avenue Complete Street Improvement Powell to N CityLim $9.5 2 TBDHealdsburg Avenue-Mill Street Improvements $2.0 6 TBDHealdsburg Plaza Streetscape Rehabilitation $2.2 4 TBDUS-101 Central Healdsburg Offramp Improvements (Roundabout) $10.0 5 TBDADA Upgrades $8.0 8 AnnualFoss Creek Pathway Class II $1.3 10 TBDFoss Creek Segments 9 & 10 $3.5 7 TBD
Total $79.6
24
scta.ca.gov
Petaluma
10Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
$243.6 $217.0
$22.9
Cost by Project Type ($M)
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $243.6 2024-2044Caulfield Lane Reconstruction $4.0 10 2028D Street Reconstruction $4.0 6 2028East Washington Street Reconstruction $8.0 8 2035Petaluma Crosstown Connector and Rainier Interchange $115.0 1 TBDSouthern Crossing at Caulfield Lane $72.0 3 TBDTraffic Signals ITS Upgrades $10.0 5 2030Washington Street Bridge Seismic Retrofit $4.0 2 2021Class 2 bicycle lane segments citywide $0.9 9 TBDLynch Creek Trail Rehabilitation $7.0 4 2035Petaluma River Trail $15.0 7 2025
Total $483.5
25
scta.ca.gov
Rohnert Park
11Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
$63.9 $44.1
$17.9
Cost by Project Type ($M)
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $63.9 2024-2044Central Rohnert Park PDA – Commercial Connector Street Completion $5.7 3 2022-2025Central Rohnert Park PDA - Rohnert Park Expressway Slip Streets $3.6 2 2022-25Citywide Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Implementation $5.7 9 2025Redwood Drive Bridge Replacement at Hinebaugh Creek $10.0 8 2030Southwest Boulevard Corridor Improvements $2.2 4 2025State Farm Drive Overcrossing $17.0 1 2035Central Rohnert Park PDA Complete Streets Improvements $6.0 10 2025Enhanced Bike/Pedestrian Crossings at NWP Railroad $2.0 5 2022Highway 101 Bicycle/Pedestrian Crossing $7.0 6 2035Trail to Crane Creek Regional Park $2.9 7 2020
Total $125.9
26
scta.ca.gov
Santa Rosa
12Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
$308.6 $251.5
$74.5
Cost by Project Type ($M)
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $308.6 2024-2044Chanate Road - Resiliency Corridor $12.5 7 2040Downtown Connectivity to Support Housing Density Intensification $25.0 1 2025Fulton Road Interchange @ Hwy 12 - Phase 2 $50.0 8 2040Hwy 101 Corridor Interchange Improvements $98.0 3 2022Southeast Santa Rosa Multi Modal Resiliency Corridor Enhancement - Road $66.0 6 2030-2045Citywide Bikeways and pathways Projects 1st Phase - Plan Update $6.0 9 2035Climate Adaptation Technology Innovation Transport Initiatives $6.5 2 2025East West Bikeways and pathways Connections $24.0 4 2022Southeast Greenway Multi Use Path and Crossings $20.0 5 2040Southeast Santa Rosa Multi Modal Resiliency Corridor Enhancement - Bike/Ped $18.0 6 2030-2045
Total $634.6
27
scta.ca.gov
Sebastopol
13Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $21.3 2024-2044Bodega Corridor Project $5.0 1 2021-2024Pavement Rehabilitation Program $5.0 2 2024-2028Alternate West Route to Sebastopol $5.0 4 2030West Sebastopol Active Transport Plan $8.3 3 2025
Total $44.6
$21.3
$10.0
$13.3
Cost by Project Type ($M)
28
scta.ca.gov
Sonoma
14Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $23.9 2024-2044Intersection Improvements at SR12 Broadway and SR12 West Napa St. $6.0 5 2024Intersection Improvements at SR12 Sonoma Highway and West Napa St $3.0 4 2023Intersection Improvements at West Spain St. and Fifth St. West $2.0 2 2021Safety Improvements at Fifth St. West $3.0 1 2020Broadway (SR12) Streetscape Enhancements and Traffic Circulation $6.0 3 2022
Total $43.9
$23.9 $14.0
$6.0
Cost by Project Type ($M)
29
scta.ca.gov
Sonoma County
15Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $575.3 2024-20448th Street East Corridor Improvements 2: Napa Rd. to Napa St. $4.0 3 20248th Street East Corridor Improvements 3: Hwy 121 @ 8th St East $4.0 3 2024Airport Boulevard Widening Ordiance Road and Aviation Boulevard $50.0 2 TBDArnold/Madrone Intersection Improvements $2.0 5 TBDMirabel Road Corridor Improvements 3: River Rd @ Mirabel $3.6 1 2026Mirabel Road Corridor Improvements 4: Hwy 116 at Mirabel Rd $24.2 1 2026Railroad Ave Improvements $4.0 4 TBDRiver Road Widening - Fulton to Old Redwood Hwy $7.0 8 TBDTodd Road Reconstruction $30.0 7 TBD8th Street East Corridor Improvements 1: Sonoma/Schellville Trail $7.0 3 2024Bodega Bay Trail $7.7 6 2021Mirabel Road Corridor Improvements 1: West County Trail Extension $3.0 1 2026Mirabel Road Corridor Improvements 2: River Rd. to Hwy 116 $12.1 1 2026Russian River Trail $27.0 9 2030Sonoma Valley Trail (aka Central Sonoma Valley Trail) $26.0 10 2025
Total $787.0
$575.3
$128.9
$82.9
Cost by Project Type ($M)
30
scta.ca.gov
Windsor
16Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSmooth and maintained roads $1.0 2024-2044Arata Lane Interchange Phase 2B NB On-ramp (CIP FY 2016-2017) $4.0 2 2023-2024Jaguar Way Roadway (CIP 2015-2016) $9.0 3 2024-2025Shiloh Road Interchange Reconstruction $45.0 5 2028-2029US 101 Overcrossing of Arata Lane $18.0 6 2030-2035Downtown Ped & Bike Crossing of US 101 Phase 1 - Underpass Widen $7.0 1 2027-2029Downtown Ped & Bike Crossing of US 101 Phase 2 - Overcrossing $16.6 4 2029-2031
Total $100.6
$1.0
$76.0
$23.6
Cost by Project Type ($M)
31
scta.ca.gov
Petaluma Transit
17Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeFare Free Program $9.7 3 2024-2044Ongoing Bus Stop Improvements $6.7 4 2024-2044Service expansion $37.4 2 2024-2044Transit Fleet & Facility Electrification (transitioning toward zero emissions fleet by 2029) $11.9 1 2024-2044Transit Innovation Projects $9.9 5 2024-2044
Total $75.6
32
scta.ca.gov
Santa Rosa CityBus
18Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeEnhanced Core Network and Rapid Bus (operating) $148.9 2 2024-2044Enhanced Core Network Part 1 of 3 (capital)--Fleet Expansion (transitioning toward zero emissions fleet by 2029) $13.7 4 2024-2044Enhanced Core Network Part 2 of 3 (capital)--Facility Expansion $15.0 4 2024-2029Enhanced Core Network Part 3 of 3 (capital)--Rapid Bus planning, engineering, and infrastructure $11.6 4 2023-2027Systemwide Fare-free Transit and Paratransit $50.0 3 2024-2044Transit Fleet Electrification (transitioning toward zero emissions fleet by 2029) $20.0 1 2024-2044
Total $259.2
33
scta.ca.gov
SMART
19Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSMART Pathway $40.0 4 2022
Total $40.0
34
scta.ca.gov
Sonoma County Transit
20Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeSCT Countywide Bus Stop Improvements $1.7 5 2024-2044SCT Expanded Core Intercity Routes $25.9 2 2024-2044SCT Expanded Local Transit Services $16.4 3 2024-2044SCT Fleet Replacement & Electric Charging Infrastructure (transitioning toward zero emissions fleet by 2029) $27.2 1 2024-2044SCT Local Route Fare-Free Program $8.5 4 2024-2044
Total $79.7
35
scta.ca.gov
RCPA
21Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeRural EV Charger Network $5.9 NA TBDCountywide Bikeways and pathways Signage Program $0.5 NA 2021GreenTRIP Sonoma County $0.5 NA TBD
Total $6.9
$5.9
$0.5 $0.5
Cost by Project Type ($M)
36
scta.ca.gov
SCTA
22Revised 3/24/2020
Project TypeSmooth and maintained roadsMove traffic and improve safetyBuild bikeways and pathwaysIncrease bus service
Project Name Project Cost ($M) Measure M Priority Project TimeframeHighways 116 and 121 Intersection Improvements $22.0 NA 2019Landscaping - Highway 101 HOV Corridor $18.0 NA 2015-2030Countywide Expansion of Micromobility and first/last mile $90.0 NA 2021Safe Routes to School $26.0 NA ongoingTransportation Management $40.0 NA 2021
Total $196.0
$40.0
$116.0
$40.0
Cost by Project Type ($M)
37
Sonoma County Transportation AuthorityMeasure M Appropriation/Invoice Status Report
FY 19/20
Project Sponsor Project NameMeasure M Program
Prior Apprp Balance
19/20 Programmed
19/20 Amount Apprp
Appropriation Date
Last Invoice Date
Balance Remaining Notes
Santa Rosa Hearn Avenue (Phase 3) LSP $595,514 $0 $0 7/10/17 12/17/19 $580,762 R/WSanta Rosa Hearn Avenue (Phase 3) LSP $1,155,502 $0 $0 7/10/17 12/17/19 $1,001,172 PSE Santa Rosa Fulton Road Impvrovements LSP $379,860 $0 $0 9/11/17 12/17/19 $28,787 PSESanta Rosa Fulton Road Impvrovements LSP $24,928 $0 $0 9/11/17 12/17/19 $28,787 R/W SUP Sonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping LSP $20,499 $0 $0 3/27/17 2/20/20 $13,561 CON SUPSonoma County Airport Blvd Landscaping LSP $333,583 $0 $0 3/27/17 2/20/20 $320,659 CON CAPSanta Rosa Santa Rosa Creek Trail Bike/Ped $45,267 $110,000 $0 6/11/18 12/17/19 $44,625 Not prog'd, bal not approp'd in 18/19Rohnert Park Access Across 101 Bike/Ped $247,011 $0 $0 6/11/2018 2/11/2020 $245,790Sonoma Co Reg Parks Central Sonoma Valley Trail Bike/Ped $20,000 $0 $0 7/9/2018 10/14/2019 $0Sonoma Co Reg Parks Bodega Bay Trail Bike/Ped $0 $350,000 $0 Not prog'd, not approp'd in 18/19; push100 prog'd to 20/21Sonoma Co Reg Parks Sonoma Schellville Trail Bike/Ped $0 $200,000 $0 $100 prog'd, $100 not approp'd in 18/19Sonoma County TPW Arnold Drive Bike Lanes Bike/Ped $0 $250,000 $0 12/9/2019 2/20/2020 $92,720 Was 1st Invoice final?Healdsburg Foss Creek Trail Bike/Ped $0 $1,840,000 $0 $1,062 not prog'd, not appop'd in 18/19SCBC BTW (SCBC) Bike/Ped $0 $13,000 $0 $0 Appropriation request on 4/13 SCTA agendaSMART NWPRR Bike/Ped $414,896 $0 $0 7/10/19 $140,868 PSE
$2,763,000 $0 $2,497,730 total remaining
Project approaching 6 months
Projects that are past 6 months for invoicing or appropriation $524,004 Bike Ped Remaining
OR projects that are programmed for 19/20 that have not been
appropriated after 6 mos. $1,973,726 LSP Remaining
38
Sonoma County Travel Model Vehicle Miles Traveled Summary Key – Column Descriptions:
1. Jurisdiction – Sonoma County Jurisdiction, The Sonoma County Travel Model summarizes jurisdiction using Sphere of Influence in order to avoid fluctuations and shifts in estimates over time due to annexations.
2. Total VMT – Total VMT produced by and attracted to each jurisdiction. NOTE ON TOTAL VMT - The recommendation/standard proposed by the RTAC for SB 375 compliance and GHG estimation recommended assigning 50% of VMT for trips entering or leaving a jurisdiction or study area to the trip origin and destination to avoid double counting of VMT. OPR’s recommendation for SB 743 compliance is to count 100% of all VMT in order to avoid skewing results favorably for projects near jurisdictional boundaries. The travel model is able to estimate VMT based on trips produced by and attracted to each jurisdiction. Based on OPR guidance total VMT has been calculated by including both VMT for productions and attractions (TOT_VMT_P + TOT_VMT_A). This leads to VMT being double counted in this total VMT estimate.
3. Residential VMT (All home-based) - Production end home-based VMT – Estimate represents all VMT generated or produced by homes/residences in each jurisdiction. Includes HBW (work), HBS (school), and HBO (other) trip purposes. OPR guidance recommends this as the metric for measuring residential development impacts.
4. Employment VMT (commute only) - Attraction end home-based work VMT - Estimate represents commute/work VMT generated or attracted to destinations or workplace locations/job locations in each jurisdiction. OPR guidance recommends this metric for measuring VMT impacts for office projects.
5. Total Population – Population estimate for each TAZ. Calculated using a persons/HH conversion. Adjusted made using ABAG population estimates.
6. Total Employment – Employment estimate for each TAZ. Calculated using employee/SQFT or other conversion. Adjusted made based on ABAG employment estimates.
7. VMT/Service Population – Total VMT/Service Population (population + employment) – This is an efficiency metric that Fehr & Peers has recommended as a possible option for project analysis and measuring thresholds.
8. Residential VMT/Capita – Residential VMT/Total Population -> All home based VMT generated or produced at each jurisdiction divided by total population providing Residential VMT/capita or an efficiency metric for residential VMT. OPR guidance recommends this efficiency metric for measuring residential development impacts.
9. Employment VMT/Worker – Employment VMT (commute)/Total Employment -> All commute VMT attracted to each jurisdiction, simulating work related travel generated by that jurisdiction. Represents work VMT/workers or an efficiency metric for work VMT at worksite or employment location. OPR guidance recommends this efficiency metric for measuring office project VMT impacts.
*Note: Service Population = Population + Employment
Generated 3‐10‐2020
Sonoma County Travel Model 2015 Estimates ‐ Total VMT and VMT Efficiency Estimates
40
Inactive ObligationsLocal, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects
Updated on 03/16/2020 Projects > $50k
Project Number
Status Agency Action Required State Project No
Project Prefix
District County Agency RTPA MPO Project Description
Latest Date Earliest Authorization Date
Latest Payment Date Last Action Date Program Codes Total Cost Amount
Obligations Amount
Expenditure Amount
Unexpended Balance
6411010 Inactive Invoice under review by Caltrans. Monitor 0418000334ATPSB1L 4 SON Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit Distr Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan TraIN PETALUMA: 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 Z003 $2,075,675.00 $400,000.00 $0.00 $400,000.005920118 Inactive Invoice overdue. Contact DLAE. 0400020427BRLO 4 SON Sonoma County Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan TraCHALK HILL RD01/10/2019 04/10/2012 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 L11E $531,180.00 $531,180.00 $160,345.44 $370,834.565022054 Inactive Final invoice under review by Caltrans. Mo0413000163HSIPL 4 SON Petaluma Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan TraLAKEVILLE HWY04/25/2018 11/27/2013 04/25/2018 04/25/2018 ZS30 $302,677.00 $272,400.00 $84,600.00 $187,800.005920138 Future Invoice ASAP to avoid inactivity. 0413000106BRLO 4 SON Sonoma County Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan TraLAMBERT BRID05/02/2019 02/01/2013 05/02/2019 05/02/2019 M233 $1,068,750.00 $1,068,750.00 $821,795.80 $246,954.205039023 Future Invoice ASAP to avoid inactivity. 0414000356STPL 4 SON Cloverdale Metropolitan Transportation Commission Metropolitan TraCLOVERDALE A06/12/2019 06/12/2019 06/12/2019 Z240 $331,739.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
1of241
Inactive ObligationsLocal, State Administered/Locally Funded and Rail Projects
Updated on 03/16/2020 Projects < $50kProject Number
Status Agency Action Required State Project No Project Prefix District County Agency RTPA MPO Project Description Latest Date Earliest Authorization Date
Latest Payment Date
Last Action Date
Program Codes Total Cost Amount Obligations Amount
Expenditure Amount
Unexpended Balance
5379021 Inactive Invoice returned to agency. Contact DLAE0415000181L CML 4 SON Rohnert Park Metropolitan Transportation C Metropolitan Transportation CommissioIN ROHNERT PARK: COMMERCE & COP 08/14/2018 06/24/2016 08/14/2018 08/14/2018 Z003 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 $459,688.25 $40,311.755022050 Inactive No funds remaining to invoice. 0400020947L-0 BHLS 4 SON Petaluma Metropolitan Transportation C Metropolitan Transportation CommissioWASHINGTON STREET BRIDGE OVER P08/30/2018 04/05/2011 08/30/2018 08/30/2018 Q120 $250,000.00 $221,325.00 $221,249.07 $75.93
![Fehr Bros Garage Door Catalog[1]](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/543ca277b1af9f5f378b466c/fehr-bros-garage-door-catalog1.jpg)
