Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 1
Technology Transfer & Integration
Known & Unknowns Impacting Business
Continuity
Sinduspharma/ANVISA/IPS Symposium, Brasilia, Brazil
June 25, 2012
Mike Yelvigi
Sr. Director, CMC Portfolio Management (Retd.)
Pfizer, Inc. New York
&
Michael ‘Mick’ Banks
Vice President, CMC Portfolio Management (Retd.)
Pfizer, Inc. New York
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
Current context-Why ?
Review of Technology Transfer & Integration concepts
Types of Technology Transfer & Integration Processes
Risks and Unknown Challenges
Examples of Successful Technology Transfers
The Future
Technology Transfer & Integration AGENDA
2
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
Current Issues facing Business
Continuity-Headline News !!
Inadequate Tech Transfer of Oral Contraceptive
Prompts FDA Warning Letter to Warner Chilcott
May 2nd, 2012
Doxil Drug Shortage at J&J-impacting cancer patients
FDA imports life saving drugs from Sun Pharma, India to fill shortages
Genzyme plant shut down –viral contamination
Major Pharma delays Phase 3 start of Oncology drug…….
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 4
Current Issues facing Business Continuity
Of the ~178 drug shortages in US~50% are due to CMC problems e.g. validation failure, sterility issues, lack of capacity, poor technology transfer…FDA
While QbD is recently introduced concept, we concurrently need to fix manufacturing processes to maintain business continuity
Technology Integration -not well understood across business-processes and regulatory processes !
Overall lost opportunity in billions & ineffective patient care !!!
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 5
Technology Transfer & Integration-The Impact
Effort for Technology Transfer and Integration underestimated
Drug shortages at extreme
Major compliance issues
Increased Costs
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
What is Pharmaceutical Technology
Transfer & Integration - Definition Technology Transfer
Systematic approach of conveying knowledge &
expertise, documentation, equipment & technology,
systems and processes between parties
A technology transfer will be successful if the
receiving unit can routinely reproduce the product,
process and/or method against a predefined set of
specifications, and to up to date standards and
regulations.
Technology Integration:
A systematic approach of harmonization of two or
more functional processes like R&D, Manufacturing,
Quality Systems, IT etc.
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 7
Technology Transfer &
Integration-Why is it important ?
Over the last two decades many mergers & acquisitions resulting in:
– Cost Reduction and business simplification
– Consolidation of facilities (R&D/Manufacturing)
– Harmonization of systems
– Increased CRO and CMO participation
– Increased licensing
– Increased Regulatory Scrutiny
– It is imperative that technology transfer meet both regulatory and market place dynamics to be competitive
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 8
Industry Consolidation 1980-2003
SKF Allegan Beckman
SKB Beecham
SKB
DPS
Sterling
GSK
Glaxo
Wellcome
GW
Affymax
B-M
Mead
Johnson Westwood
Dupont
BMS
Zimmer
BMS
Zimmer
Squibb
GlaxoSmithKline Bristol-Myers Squibb
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 9
Industry Consolidation 1980-2003
Ciba Geigy
C-G Sandoz
Food &
Beverage
Lek
Sygenta
Novartis
BASF
Generics
Novartis Pfizer
Pharmacia
AB
UpJohn
Monsanto
(Ag)
Pharmacia
Wyeth
Pfizer
G.D.
Searle
Monsanto
Monsanto
Sugen
W/L
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 10
Industry Consolidation 1980-2003
Marion
Merrell Richardson
Hoechst
Sanofi
Aventis
Centeon
Merrell
Dow
Roussel
Uclaf
Aventis
Behring
Institut
Merieux
Rhône-
Poulenc
Union
Carbide
Ag
Rorer Rhône-
Poulenc
Rorer
Animal
Nutrition
Crop
Sciences
-Bayer
Pasteur
Merieux
Connaught
Connaught
Hoechst
Marion
Roussel
Marion
Merrell
Dow
History Keeps Repeating !!
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 11
Marion
Merrell Richardson
Hoechst
Ave
ntis
Centeon
Merrell
Dow
Roussel
Uclaf
Aventis
Behring
Institut
Merieux
Rhône-
Poulenc
Union
Carbide
Ag
Rorer Rhône-
Poulenc
Rorer
Animal
Nutrition
Crop
Sciences
-Bayer
Pasteur
Merieux
Connaught
Connaug
ht
Hoe
chst
Mari
on
Rou
ssel
Marion
Merrell
Dow
Ciba Geigy
C-G Sandoz
Food &
Beverage
Lek
Sygenta
Novartis
BASF
Generics
B-M
Mead
Johnson Westwood
Dupont
BMS
Zimmer BMS
Zimmer
Squibb
SKF Allegan Beckman
SKB Beecham
SKB
DPS
Sterling
GSK
Glazo
Wellcome
GW
Affymax
SKF Allegan Beckman
SKB Beecham
SKB
DPS
Sterling
GSK
Glazo Wellcome
GW Affymax
Pharmacia
AB
UpJohn
Monsanto
(Ag)
Pharmacia
Wyeth
Pfizer
G.D.
Searle
Monsanto
Monsanto
Sugen
Technology Transfers &
Integrations:Wide Scope !
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 13
Product Life Cycle & Tech.Transfer
Technology Transfer
Technology Transfer
Pre-Clinical Development
Phase I Phase II Phase III Scale-up through Launch
Post-Approval
New Entity, IND Application
Phase II Phase III Scale-up through Launch
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 14
Types of Technology Transfers &
integrations
Internal (Intra-company)
Process Development to Clinical Production
Process Development to QC (Quality Control)
Clinical production to Commercial production
(site to site)
External
Client to CMO (Contract Manufacturing
Organization)
Third party to CMO
CMO to Client or another contractor
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 15
Types of Technology Transfers & Integrations
Types of Transfers
– Scale-up
R&D to Process Development
Process Development to Production
– Within site
– Site to Site
Within Region
Within Country
Country to Country
– Company to Company (M&A)
Phase of development
Third Party
Licensing
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 16
Facility
Pharmaceutical Technology
Transfer & Integration Scope
DRUG
PRODUCT
Manufacturing
Process
Training
Equipment
Packaging
Systems
Analytical
Methods
Raw Materials
Quality Systems
Drug Substance
Computers
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 17
Technology Transfer-Current Status
There is no uniformity in technology transfer process across industry
Technology transfer criteria better understood in other industries -Auto, Diagnostics where it is easier to measure success
Larger companies have their own systems, guidelines and SOPs
No regulatory guidelines in general on technology transfer
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 18
Technology Transfer- The Old Way
Phase III Scale-up through Launch
Post-Approval Pre-Clinical
Development Phase I Phase II
R&D Manufacturing
•Unreliable
•Costly
•Wasteful
•Limited Information Exchange
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
Prod.
Process
Understandin
g
Systematic TTI
approach
People
Expertise SUCCESS
Technology Transfer & Integration:
“An equation For Success”
•Strong
Leadership
•Trust & Respect
•Partnership
•Mutual
recognition of
Expertise &
experience
•Joint ownership
and authority
Guidelines:
ISPE
-WHO
Guideline 2011
Japan guideline
Comprehensive
Business
Process Tools
Training
-
ICH-Q8,
ICHQ9
ICHQ10
QbD
PAT
Modeling
Reproducible
Manufacturing
& Release
Continuous
Supply Chain
Continuous
Improvement
Sustained
Regulatory
compliance
Reduced Cost 19
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 20 20
THREE MAJOR BUILDING BLOCKS
Governance
Process
Guiding Principles
Detailed interdependent flowchart of
decisions, documents and physical
deliverables that constitute the
Tech.Transfer process
Structural environment in which
Tech.Transfer process operates
• Dedicated cross-functional -
development team with sub teams
(API, DP) responsible for carrying out
development process
• Single governance team ,
Foundation upon which Master Tech.
Transfer Strategy is built
• Defines Strategy (Master Plan)
• Lays out agreed-upon development
strategies
• Defines roles and responsibilities
1
2
3
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 21
Technology Transfer: Ideal Process
Phase III Scale-up through Launch
Post-Approval Pre-Clinical
Development Phase I Phase II
R&D Manufacturing
•Shared Ownership
•Shared technology
•Shared Responsibility
•More reliable
•Much less cost
•Better compliance
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 22
Technology Transfer & Integration
Pitfalls
-Corporate level
-R&D Level
-Pharmaceutical Science level
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 23
Challenges in Mergers & Acquisitions
Complex process (Business, Regulatory,
Operations, R&D)
Initial focus on financial & timelines
Underestimation of downstream activity
(e.g. Manufacturing transfers-
Integration, R&D process Integration)
Managing third party alliance and
continuity
Many unknowns
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 24
Challenges for R&D integration
Huge Merger task- Global centers involved,
personnel, budget (several billon $)
Project goals/deadlines (NDA ,IND, Launch
dates)
Managing Clinical study continuity- supply
complexity
Capacity and skill sets (existing organizational
design constructs)
Expectation is exquisite business continuity !!!!!
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 25
Challenges for R&D integration
Different philosophies & organizational construct
Managing R&D Support Systems of two merged
companies:
GMP & Non GMP Documentation systems, IT
systems, LIMS merger, SOP systems
R&D Report Migrations (Thousands of Reports-
need good retrieval system-ease of access)
Change Control systems between two companies
(different global sites)
Managing HR harmonization of personnel
Pharmaceutical Sciences: Some Challenges
Legacy Products-significant technical Challenges, may not
support US FDA Stage 1 process validation requirements
Lack of background information for de-risking the process,
e.g. API , in-process details
Limited process knowledge
Process understanding to minimize Program Risk and to
implement effective control strategy
Complexity of product manufacture, registration time lines
in different global zones
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 26
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
27 27
How to Achieve Effective
Technology integrations:
Senior level Strong leadership
Defined Frame work (clear timelines,
costs, objectives and boundaries)
Comprehensive Plans at all levels
Crisp Communication & Decision
making
Routine follow up on progress and
completion of action
Successful R&D Center Mergers between two
large Pharma companies:
More than 150 projects evaluated from Phase 0-
Phase 3 in less than 1.5 Years
Effective transfers completed for ~80 projects from
Ph1-Ph3 on turn key basis in less than 1.2 Years
Effective merger of vast documentation and Quality
systems (Parallel and Establish mode)-including
merger of IT, Regulatory, cGMP training
Achieved redefined R & D footprint
Secured business continuity-project & regulatory
milestones, clinical trial supplies & time lines
Slim and effective team managements with Roles
and Responsibility defined from top to execution
level Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 28
How was the R&D Integration successful?
Various Teams from Corporate to individual Project
Team levels
Facility-Equipment Team (Engineering)
People Team (Human Resource Management)
Knowledge Management team (Implicit & Explicit
KM)
Key Transfer Tools-Professional Business Process
Tools , Harmonized Templates across all activities
Members from both organizations
Transparent & Effective communication at all levels
Drug Product Transfer (Lead 1-1.5 Years)
API Transfers (Lead 1-3 Years)
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 29
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 30
Portfolio: Overall Transition Plan
-
2011 2012
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
3 months
3 months
3 months
4 months
4 months
Key
Milestones
Waves
Data Exchange in place
Wave 5-15
Wave 4-14
Wave 3-5
Wave 2-20
Wave 1-10
Pre-Data Exchange
Data exchange
available for IT solution
Pending IT solution
by 3/31; if not met,
Wave 2 will resemble
Wave 1
Transfer of
operational roles
& responsibilities
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 31 31
Project Transfer team
Single team per project,
multi-discipline
membership, executes
specific asset activities
and assures coordination
of program across departments
Team
Lead
ARD API
DP
API
DP
Reg
Supply
Sourcing
DP
Clinical
What about Technology Transfer of
Products from R&D to
Manufacturing ?
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 33
Technology Transfer of products
from R&D to Manufacturing
R&D Manufacturing
•Shared Ownership
•Shared technology
•Shared Responsibility
•More reliable
•Much less cost
•Better compliance
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 34 34
GUIDING PRINCIPLES & GENERAL STRATEGIES
• A single Development Plan is
jointly developed for each project
• This document will cover the full
development activities for the
project.
• This plan will evolve through the
course of development & transfer
• The plan reviewed and endorsed
by the team.
• Major changes (timeline,
resources, level of risk) to the
baseline plan will be reviewed
with the team.
Guiding Principle
Ownership and Deliverables
Roles & Responsibilities
• Regulatory
• Technology
• Capital Investment
• Manufacture of Supplies in Mfg.
facilities
Strategies and Activities
• Launch
• Teams and timing
• Materials supply
• Site selection & technology
transfer
• Licensing opportunities
• Right First Time
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 35 35
Qualification
An Example of Team Formations:
Design Phase
Pharma Delivery
Team
Core
Line Management
Sub-teams kick-off
-Define Sub-Teams
-Kick Off, as
needed
Dev Plan
Assigne Members
as Line Managers
Initiate Mfg
Site
Decision(1)
Sub-Team
members selected
Provide sourcing
info for Site
Selection
Sub-Teams
R to D
transition
Input to Plan
Submit Plan
Endorse Dev
Plan(2)
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 36 36
NEXT STEPS ARE TO EXECUTE AGAINST
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Execute Dev Plan
Qualification
Review and endorse
Milestone Docs )
Involved as necessary according team
Engagement Rules
Execute and Update
Dev. plans, if necessary
Ensure cross line alignment,
milestones, endorse
changes to plans, aid issue
resolution
Pharma Delivery
Team
Core Line
Management
Sub-teams
EXECUTE VALIDATION PROTOCOL AND
MANUFACTURE LAUNCH BATCHES
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 37 37
Validation protocol
for commercial
supplies*
Endorse validation
strategy
Involved as
necessary
Validation
Produce
validation
batches
Assume full
manufacturing
responsibility
Post-launch
Transition of Core
and Sub Team
leadership to Prod.
Compile Post-
launch lessons
learned
Review post-
launch lessons
learned
Pharma Delivery
Team
Core
Line Management
Sub-Teams
Mfg.
CTD Filed
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 38
How to measure success ?
•Ability of “receiving unit” to manufacture and
release product on a reproducible manner
•Absence of regulatory issues
•Continuous supply chain
•No failures
•Ability to meet cost of goods
TOOLS & TEMPLATES
Technology Transfer & Integration
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 39
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks
Product Robustness Index
Product
Robustness
Measures
Descriptions Calculation
Stability Is the following product stability available:
–6 months accelerated product stability data predictive of 24 months expiry/shelf life in the intended commercial packages (bottle/blister)
Yes/No
Dosage Uniformity Definition in process
Goal is to develop a statistical confidence interval to include in the definition
Yes/No
Risk Assessment Has a risk assessment been completed and broadly agreed (by key stakeholders – Technology, R&D, Quality) as per ICH guidelines?
Yes/No
Critical Quality Attributes of Product
Critical Quality Attributes have been identified and assessed at gate, including:
Yes/No
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 41 41
Clinical Supplies Risk Assessment
Project Description /
Business Case
Develop and imbed a
detailed Clinical Supplies
Risk Assessment
processes for program/
protocol clinical supplies
success proactively.
Interface with Clinical and
Dev. Ops colleagues to
align risk assessments across the
R&D organization with regards to
Clinical Supplies to identify and
establish mitigation plans and
improve overall quality.
Project Scope / Objectives
Develop a Clinical Supplies Risk
Assessment Guideline and process to
be utilized during the planning and
upfront initiation of a program phase
or an individual protocol.
Risk assessment Ensure alignment
across various teams (CAPA 1, and
establish communication plan to
ensure all stakeholders are aware of
status, progress, and plan.
areas should include everything from up front
planning in the protocol as well as compliance
issues with the sites.
Project team
XYZ
ABC
DEF(Sponsors)
Project Deliverables
High Level Timeline
Risks /
Assumptions
1.Quality is the
responsibility of all
2.Alignment of
interdepartmental
objectives and initiatives
3.Internal organizational
alignment to support
development of best
model
4.Senior leadership will
need to be vocal advocates to
help drive a successful program.
CLINICAL SUPPLIES RISK ASSESSMENT J F M A M J J A S O N D
Current state review/Stakeholders Defined
Solicit Input on Content from Stakeholders
x
Develop an ongoing Monitoring Plan
Implement/Roll-out to Supply Chain
st Pilot)
Develop a detailed Clinical
Supplies Risk Assessment
Guideline document as an
appendix in CT-02 as well
as tools that will be useful
during the Risk Management
Process
Develop an implementation
plan for communicating and
al roll-out
Develop a monitoring plan for
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 42
Site Transfer
Gantt chart example:
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 43 43
Knowledge Transfer Templates
Project Name (if assigned)
Name: CureAll
Project Number (give XX number and any others
that have been used in the past)
XX-abcdefgh / ABC-123 / Sol-abcdef
Instructions for Using The Project Knowledge
Management Template: Column Definitions
Information Category: Most project information can be categorized using the descriptions contained within the PhTx PS Project
Transfer Checklist. This column indexes the descriptions.
Information Category Description: The PhTx PS Project Transfer Checklist descriptions.
Applicable to Project?: Yes/No If no, please enter rationale. For example, project has not reached this stage of development, no
licensing partners or not an on-going project activity. Suggest using "No, R" for the rationale of project has not reached this stage of
development even if the program is in Development.
Report Name: Enter the name of the type of report represented by the document. For example, Dosage Form Nomination or
Analytical Test Report. For technical reports with no formal name, use a generic descriptor such as "technical report".
Technology Transfer & Integration : the Future ?
The Pharmaceutical Industry will continue to
experience mergers, acquisitions, interactions with
many external CRO & CMOs work and internal
changes
Increased use of CMO and CRO ( business
partnership model)
(Continued) Increased emphasis on reducing cost ,
reducing timelines whilst maintaining quality
standards and achieving regulatory compliance
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 44
Technology Transfer & Integration : the Future
Increased attention to Tech Transfer &
Integrations by regulators and policy
makers in all geographical areas
Business continuity issues and lost
opportunities will likely to occur
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 45
What is needed now and in the future ? Critical focus on technology transfer and integration
exercises to avoid business continuity problems.
Well defined technology transfer and integration
policies
Further development and application of scientific
tools and processes
Further enhancement of roles, responsibilities and
processes for CMO and CRO interactions (business
partnership model)
Refinement and wider application of successful
technology transfer and integration best practices
Training to fill existing gaps and provision of
contemporary processes and templates.
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 46
Copyright 2012- Yelvigi & Banks 47 47
Mike Yelvigi
Center for Pharmaceutical Integration LLC.
&
Michael ‘Mick’ Banks
Banks Consulting Group