TELL1 high rate tests@ Birmingham
Karim Massri University of Birmingham
CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN – 26/03/2012
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 2
Introduction Experimental setup
Special requirements for the random rate (RaR) tests RaR tests: components & TELL1 input Adjusting the setup to get regular rate (ReR) signals
Results ReR & RaR results with TDCB clock @ 40 MHz ReR & RaR results with TDCB clock @ 80 MHz
Conclusions
Outline
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 3
High rate tests motivation:
Current estimated rate on each PMT of the CEDAR ~ 5 MHz
Electronics inefficiency study needed to choose the most suitable number of PMTs
Particular remarks: TDCB v5 has been used (previously v2) Single channel study TDCB clock initially @ 40 MHz, then → 80 MHz
Introduction
Increasing the clock frequency means increasing the speed of the data reading from the TDCB buffer!
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 4
Experimental setup
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 5
Special requirements for RaR tests
on the source: Source of Poissonian-distributed pulses Source must work at high rates (~MHz) Frequency must be adjustable
on the data acquisition: The number of input pulses must be known All the pulses must be sent while TELL1 is acquiring
Experimental setup
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 6
RaR tests: components
Scaler: ORTEC 9744 channels
100% efficient up to 92 MHz
LEDPMT
Light filter
Coincidence
Black Box
TRIGGER
TELL1
preAmp +
NINO
NIM to TTLconverter
CAEN 16chLow Threshold discriminator
2ch pulse generator
Attenuator (31 db)
Experimental setup
Same setup of December
tests (with TDCB v2)
TDC board (v5)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 7
RaR tests: TELL1 input
Attenuator (31 db)
2ch pulse generator
To the LED: DC voltagewith adjustable amplitude
→ variable frequency!(from 0 up to 50 MHz!)
To the NIM modules:5µs long NIM pulse @100Hz
LEDPMT
Light filter
Coincidence
CAEN 16chLow Threshold discriminator
NIM to TTLconverter
Black Box
TRIGGER
TELL1
preAmp +
NINO
TELL1 time window = 20 µs
Current firmware can handle no more than 256 words per trigger!
Experimental setup
TDC board (v5)
Same setup of December
tests (with TDCB v2)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 8
Some more details about the input...
NINO input (after the preAmp):Amplitude ~ 120 mV
Width ~ 8 nsNB: the signal is extremely regular!
(attenuated NIM signal)
Experimental setup
RaR tests: TELL1 input
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 9
ReR tests: adjusting the RaR setup..
Scaler: ORTEC 9744 channels
100% efficient up to 92 MHz
LEDPMT
Light filter
Coincidence
Black Box
TRIGGER
TELL1
preAmp +
NINO
NIM to TTLconverter
CAEN 16chLow Threshold discriminator
2ch pulse generator
Attenuator (31 db)
Experimental setup
LED can't be used to generate ReRbecause it doesn't
respond with a regularlight pulse!
TDC board (v5)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 10
2ch pulse generator
To the Low Th Discriminator:Amplitude: 25 mV
Width ~5 nsvariable frequency (0200 MHz)
To the NIM modules:5µs long NIM pulse @100Hz
Attenuator (31 db)
LEDPMT
Light filter
Coincidence
CAEN 16chLow Threshold discriminator
NIM to TTLconverter
Black Box
TRIGGER
TELL1
preAmp +
NINO
TELL1 time window = 20 µs
Current firmware can handle no more than 256 words per trigger!
ReR tests: TELL1 inputExperimental setup
TDC board (v5)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 11
Upgrading @ 80 MHz..Experimental setup
Current TELL1 firmware version: v132 (from Pisa) Current TDCB firmware version: v5 (from Pisa)
TELL1 firmware @ 80 MHz: v136 (from S.Venditti) TDCB firmware @ 80 MHz: v6 (from S.Venditti)
TDCB firmware upgrade via JAM (thanks to B.Angelucci!)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 12
Data taking procedure
Set the frequency (RaR: adjusting the LED voltage) Enable the scaler, start TELL1 acquisition Turn on the trigger pulse from the generator Wait until a certain number of counts has been reached Turn off the trigger pulse Stop scaler, end TELL1 acquisition
17 + 24 (RaR + ReR) runs / clock frequency (40MHz or 80MHz)each one for a different frequency (~1MHz to ~15 MHz)
~20000 pulses have been sent to the TELL1 during each run
Experimental setup
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 13
Results
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 14
ReR tests @ 40MHz: inefficiency
Trailing lossesdue to extra leadings
TDCB v2 (December tests) VS
TDCB v5
TELL1 high rate tests
No more event losses @ ~ 5 MHz
Up to 11 MHzNO leading losses!
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 15
RaR tests: TELL1 output
NO leading losses up to 11 MHz→Fit with exponential for t>100ns → Mean frequency measured from slope
Leading-to-leading Δt distribution measured by the TELL1
TELL1 high rate tests
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 16
TELL1 high rate tests
RaR tests @ 40MHz: inefficiencyTDCB v2 (December tests)
VSTDCB v5
v5 looks slightly better!
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 17
ReR tests @ 80MHz: inefficiency
~ same inefficiencyat double rate!
TDCB v5 @ 40 MHzVS
TDCB v5 @ 80 MHz
TELL1 high rate tests
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 18
TELL1 high rate tests
RaR tests @ 80MHz: inefficiencyTDCB v5 @ 40 MHz
VSTDCB v5 @ 80 MHz
~ same inefficiencyat double rate!
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 19
`
TELL1 high rate tests
RaR tests @ 80MHz: inefficiencyTDCB v5 @ 40 MHz
VSTDCB v5 @ 80 MHz
4% @ 5MHz(instead of ~16%)
Karim Massri – CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN
26/03/2012 20
Conclusions
TDCB v5 has been set and is now working @ Bham
(thanks to B.Angelucci!) TDCB v2 <-> TDCB v5
TDCB v5 results slightly better (@ 40 MHz)
TDCB v5 @ 80 MHz (thanks to S.Venditti!)
wrt results @ 40 MHz ~ same inefficiency at double rate (as expected) for both ReR and RaR
TDCB clock @ 80 MHz looks really promising!