Date post: | 07-Feb-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | phungthien |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2015/2/15
1
Effect of intensity of heavy rainfall on infiltration of rainwater into slope through numerical simulations
Yohei USUKI Osaka University, Osaka, JapanKazuhiro ODA Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Keigo KOIZUMI Osaka University, Osaka, JapanKyohei UMEMURA Osaka University, Osaka, JapanTakayuki ONISHI Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
The 14th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Method and Advances in Geomechanics
September 24, 2014
○
Contents
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
4. Analysis results
1. Introduction
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
Background 1/4 [Climate in Japan]
Slope disasters happen every year In Japan
TyphoonRainy season
L
It rains frequently over the entire area
Background 2/4 [Infiltration of rainwater into slope]
Bedrock
Surface runoff
InfiltrationIt’s a key component for slope disastersthat amount of rainwater infiltrate into slope
2015/2/15
2
Background 3/4 [Two factors of rainfall]
Bedrock
Intensity DurationRainfall
Long spell of rain
Background 4/4 [Typical heavy rainfall]
High intensityShort duration
Middle intensityLong duration
Time
Inte
nsity
Typical heavy rainfall
Inte
nsity
Time
Localized torrential rain
Purpose
Consideration of effect of rainfall intensity on infiltration of rainwater
Purpose
Plain slope modelChange : Soil types only
Localized torrential rainLong spell of rain
Slope
Rainfall
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
2015/2/15
3
Numerical method for analysis
Analytical code : Hydrus–2D
reproduce water behavior in unsaturated soils
th
hCxhK
xp
jij
i
)(
Richards’ Equation
h :Total head
ph :Pressure head
)(hC :Specific moisturecapacity
ijK :Hydraulic conductivity
: gradient of water characteristic curve
Water characteristic curve
Van Genuchten model
nm /11
eS :Effective saturation
:Water content
s :Saturated water content
r :Residual water content :Material parameter
m :Suctionn :Material parameter
k :Hydraulic conductivity
sk :Saturated hydraulicconductivity
l :Material parameter
2/1 })1(1{ mme
les SSkk
)/( rsreS
Water characteristic curve
Hydraulic conductivity
mnm
})(1{
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
Analytical model 1/7 [ Model slope ]
Rainfall
Free drainage
Impermeable
Unit : m
1.0
1.9
7.9
1.5
4.0
1.6
40.0°
An experiment withfull-scale model
at Tsukuba in Japan
2015/2/15
4
Analytical model 2/7 [ Model slope ]
1.0
1.9
7.9
1.5
4.0
1.6
40.0°
0.3m each
Observation points(output VWC)
Rainfall
Free drainage
Impermeable
Unit : m
Analytical model 3/7 [ Model slope ]
Soil condition : Homogeneous
Initial condition (VWC) : θ 0.15
ChangeSoil type
Fix
Rainfall
Free drainage
Impermeable
Unit : m
1.0
1.9
7.9
1.5
4.0
1.6
40.0°
Analytical model 4/7 [ Localized torrential rain ]
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Localized torrential rain
Max :119(mm/h)
Observed in Kumamoto on July 12 (2012)
Total :456(mm)
3 4 5 9 10
Analytical model 5/7 [ Long spell of rain ]
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 6 12 18 24 30 36
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Long spell of rain
Max :42(mm/h)
Observed in Shiga on September 16 (2013)
Total :502(mm)
2015/2/15
5
Analytical model 6/7 [ Analytical cases ]
SandSandy LoamLoamSandy Silt ClaySilty Clay Loam
Soil Types
Permeability
High
Low
Parameters are predicted bybasic soil data
/Case-S 0.05 0.43 0.15 2.68 8.25 10 0.5Case-SL 0.07 0.41 0.08 1.89 1.23 10 0.5Case-L 0.08 0.43 0.04 1.56 2.89 10 0.5Case-SSC 0.07 0.40 0.02 1.36 1.20 10 0.5Case-SCL 0.09 0.43 0.01 1.52 1.94 10 0.5
Analytical model 7/7 [ Water characteristic curve]
/Case-S 0.05 0.43 0.15 2.68 8.25 10 0.5Case-SL 0.07 0.41 0.08 1.89 1.23 10 0.5Case-L 0.08 0.43 0.04 1.56 2.89 10 0.5Case-SSC 0.07 0.40 0.02 1.36 1.20 10 0.5Case-SCL 0.09 0.43 0.01 1.52 1.94 10 0.5
0.01 0.1 1 10 100Suction (m)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0Volu
me
wat
er c
onte
nt
Case-SCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
2015/2/15
6
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Amount of rainfall
Rainfall
Amount of rainfall (Localized torrential rain)
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Amount of infiltrated rainwater
RainfallCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Amount of infiltrated rainwater in each four Cases
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Amount of surface runoff
RainfallCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Surface runoff in Case-SL
Rainfall – Infiltrated rainwater = Surface runoff
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Four cases and Localized torrential rain
RainfallCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Much Surface runoff occur (Localized torrential rain)
Surface runoff in Case-SL
2015/2/15
7
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36Time (h)
Four cases and Long spell of rain
RainfallCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Rainfall Intensity Surface runoff
Little surface runoff
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36Time (h)
To reveal the reason surface runoff occur
RainfallCase-SLCase-LCase-SSCCase-SCL
Distribution of volume water content in Case-L
At the time surface runoff start
Distribution of volume water content in Case-L
0.43
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Case-L
0.429
Local saturated area is observed at the surface of slope
The reason surface runoff occur
Hortnian surface runoff
Infiltration capacity Rainfall intensity<
Local saturated area
Infiltration of rainwater
Bring surface runoff
Intercept
2015/2/15
8
Maximum infiltrated rainwater
Max infiltrated rainwater (mm/h) /
Case-SL ‐ 44.2Case-L 10.5 10.4Case-SSC 4.5 4.3Case-SCL 0.9 0.7
120100
80604020
00 6 12 18 24 30 36
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Max infiltrated rainwater (mm/h)
Infiltration capacity
Time (h)
Maximum infiltrated rainwater
Max infiltrated rainwater (mm/h) /
Case-SL ‐ 44.2Case-L 10.5 10.4Case-SSC 4.5 4.3Case-SCL 0.9 0.7
120100
80604020
00 6 12 18 24 30 36
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Max infiltrated rainwater (mm/h)
Infiltration capacity
Time (h)
Amount of rainfall that infiltrate into slope
almost can be predicted by Ks (mm/h)
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
5. Conclusion
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36Time (h)
Case-S + Long spell of rain
RainfallCase-S
Little surface runoff occur in Case-S (Long spell of rain)
2015/2/15
9
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Case-S + Localized torrential rain
RainfallCase-S
Surface runoff occur (Localized torrential rain)
Case-S + Localized torrential rain
Infiltration Capacity Rainfall intensity>
Not Hortonian surface runoff
Ks = 297(mm/h)
Max : 119(mm/h)
Change of VWC with time at each depth
Case-S + Localized torrential rain120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
0 1 2 6 7 8 113 4 5 9 10
Change of VWC with time at each depth
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
Unsaturated
Case-S + Localized torrential rain120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
0 1 2 6 7 8 113 4 5 9 10
2015/2/15
10
Case-S + Localized torrential rain120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
0 1 2 6 7 8 113 4 5 9 10
Change of VWC with time at each depth
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
UnsaturatedSaturated
θ Case-S + Localized torrential rain120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
0 1 2 6 7 8 113 4 5 9 10
Change of VWC with time at each depth
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
Saturated
θ
From Bottom to Surface
The reason surface runoff occur in Case-S
The slope is completely saturatedfrom bottom to surface
Rainfall can’t infiltrate into slope more than drainage discharge
There are two types of surface runoff
Case-S + Localized torrential rain
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Numerical method for analysis
3. Analytical model
Four Cases (except for Case-S)
Case-S
4. Analysis results
5. Conclusion
2015/2/15
11
Conclusion
1. Hortnian surface runoff occurs when rainfall intensity exceeds infiltration capacity
2. It can be predicted that amount of rainwater infiltrate into the slope by saturated hydraulic
conductivity of the slope soil
3. Surface runoff sometimes occur due to saturation of the entire area of slope
Considered the effect of rainfall Intensity on Infiltration of rainwater through numerical simulations
Acknowledgement
This study was found byGrant-in Aid for Scientific Research (24510254),
for which I wish to express my gratitude here.
Thank you for your kind attention
Background 3/6 [Factors of infiltration of rainwater]
Intensity Duration
Rainfall
Angle of slopeSoil type
Thickness ofsurface layer…
Slope
2015/2/15
12
Angle of slopeSoil type
Thickness ofsurface layer…
Slope
Background 4/6 [Rainfall]
Intensity Duration
Rainfall
Background 6/6 [Slope]
Angle of slopeSoil type
Thickness ofsurface layer…
Slope
There are so many key factors that these effects on infiltration of rainwater can’t
be considered at the same time
About observation points
Indicate how water conditioninside of slope is in each time
Change of VWCwith time at each depth
output VWC at the point
Consider the reason surface runoffoccur in Case-S
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
Change of VWC with time at each depth
Case-S + Localized torrential rain Saturated
From Bottom to Surface
2015/2/15
13
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-S + Long rain Case-SL + Long rain120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 0 6 12 18 24 30 36
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
VWC changes in small step with rainfall intensity in Case-S
0.300.250.200.150.100.050.00
0.350.400.45
The way of expansion of Saturated area is different
Background 1/5 [Land Use in Japan]
Slope disasters happen every year In Japan
Slope failure ・ Debris flow ・ Landslide...
Mountains66.7%
Agriculture12.1%
Curtilage5.0% Almost occupied
by mountains
A lot of slopes
Land Use in Japan
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-SL + Guerilla rainstorm
From Surface to Bottom
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-SL + Long rain
From Surface to Bottom
2015/2/15
14
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-SL + Long rain
VWCs From Surface to 0.6m depth become Saturated at almost same time
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-SSaturated area expands
from Bottom to Surface
Case-SLSaturated area expands
from Surface to BottomCase-SThe way of expansion of Saturated area
is the converse
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-SL
Case-SSaturated area expands
from Bottom to Surface
Case-SLSaturated area expands
from Surface to Bottom
The way of expansion of Saturated areais the converse
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Amount of infiltrated rainwater 1/4
RainfallCase-S
Amount of infiltrated rainwater in Case-S
2015/2/15
15
Amount of infiltrated rainwater 5/7
Hortnian Surface Runoff
Infiltration Capacity Intensity of Rainfallvs
Deep red shows θ
Distribution of VWC(when Surface runoff start)
Local Saturated area
Infiltration of rainwater
Generates Surface runoff
Decrease
Like Guerilla Rainstorm
< 120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
Amount of infiltrated rainwater 1/4
RainfallCase-S
Rainfall – Infiltrated rainwater = Surface runoff
Purpose 1/2
The relationship between Rainfall and Slope disasters
Key Point
For Example
High Intensity Rainfall : Intensity > Infiltration
Debris flow
Focus
Infiltration of Rainwater into slope
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 1 2 6 7 8 11
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
3 4 5 9 10Time (h)
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-S + Guerilla rainstorm
All VWCs become constant value
2015/2/15
16
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
The characteristic of seepage flow /
Case-S + Long rain
Shallow surface area isn’t saturatedBut : Inside has much moisture
One dimension seepage flow 1/2
Seepage flow direction= Gravity direction
Homogeneous soil
The characteristic of Seepage flowIn Case-S and Case-SL
Amount of infiltrated rainwater 7/7
Max Infiltrated rainwater (mm/h) /
Case-S - 297.0Case-SL 44.2 44.2Case-L 10.5 10.4Case-SSC 4.5 4.3Case-SCL 0.9 0.7
120100
80604020
00 6 12 18 24 30 36
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Max Infiltrated rainwater (mm/h)
Focus
Case-S Case-SL
The Cases that rainwater infiltrate plenty into the slope
Next discussion : Seepage flow in the slope
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Rai
nfal
l (m
m/h
)
Time (h)
Volu
me
Wat
er C
onte
nt
Surface -0.3m -0.9m-0.6m
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.35
0.40
0.45
One dimension seepage flow 1/
Case-S + Long spell of rain
Surface isn’t saturated