The Absorption of NIR Solar Radiation by Precipitation from Clouds
W.F.J. Evans,Trent University,Peterborough,Ontario K9J7B8
Email: [email protected]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSE. Puckrin,co-investigatorS. Cober for droplet distributions.H. Barker and CSA for field support.D. Travers for data analysisMSC and G. Isaac for providing AIRS aircraft flights and Mirabel siteEnbridge Consumers Gas for funding support. NSERC for matching IOR grant .
FTS BOMEM DA-8 at Mirabel
AIRS Convair 580 Aircraft
FTS Magna 550 on Aircraft
Ground Cloud Observations with Magna FTS
NIR Cloud Transmission Spectra
3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 100000.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
B
C
A
W avenum ber (cm -1)
Irrad
ianc
e (re
lativ
e un
its)
N ear-infrared spectra of the clear sky (curve A), of light overcast c loud (curve B) and of very heavy overcast c loud (curve C) obta ined on April 11 and 12, 1995 at Peterborough, O ntario.
clear
thick
thin
Cloud Spectrum Matches Transmission of 2 mm of Liquid Water
3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 00 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
Appa
rent
Tra
nsm
issi
on
B
C
A
W a ve n u m b e r (cm -1 )
C lo u d tra n sm iss io n sp e c tra fo r lig h t o ve rca s t c lo u d (cu rve A ) a n d ve ry h e a vy o ve rca s t c lo u d (cu rve B ). C u rve C re p re se n ts th e la b o ra to ry tra n sm iss io n sp e c tru m a ttr ib u te d to a 2 -m m p a th o f liq u id w a te r.
light
thick
water
Transmission of a Droplet Spray from a Hose Showing Liquid Water Absorption 5600 to 6600 cm-1
Le ft H and S ide C u rve from D e tec tion o f L iqu id W a te r20 o S ca tte ring /D irec t M easu rem en t
W a ve num b er (cm -1)4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Tran
smis
sion
-0 .2
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
1 .2
1 .4
0 .5 m m W ate r C e ll
S ca tte ring a t 20 o
= Water vapour bands
Transmission of a Droplet Spray from a Hose Showing Liquid Water Absorption below 8000 cm-1
H o s e T ra n s m is s io n C o m p a re d W ith 0 .5 m m W a te r C e ll
W a v e N u m b e r
4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Tran
smis
sion
0 .0
0 .2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
1 .2
W a v e N u m b e r v s C o l 7 T ra n s m is s io n o f .5 m m L W C
Tran
smis
sion
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Rad
ianc
e
Rain at 85o/ 65o
Rain at 85o/ 65o
M e a s u r e m e n t s 8 5 a n d 6 5 M i n u s I n t e r n a l S i g n a l
W a v e N u m b e r
4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Tran
smis
sion
- 5
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
W a v e n u m b e r ( c m - 1 )4 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rad
ianc
e (W
/m2 c
m-1
)
- 0 . 0 1
0 . 0 0
0 . 0 1
0 . 0 2
0 . 0 3
0 . 0 4
M e a s u r e m e n t o v e r c a s t c lo u d
M O D T R A N w i t h 2 m m d is t r ib u t io n
M O D T R A N w i t h 1 2 µ m d is t r ib u t io n
Rad
ianc
e Rain Spectrum at 85o & 65o
Precipitating Cloud vs Rain Radiance SpectraR
adia
nce(
W/c
m-1
-sr-m
2 )
Transmission Spectrum of Drizzling Fog showing Liquid Absorption Compared to .5 mm Water Cell
W avenum ber (cm -1)4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
Tran
smis
sion
0 .0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.5 m m W ater Cell
Drizzle in Fog ………
.
Drizzle in fog
Sequence Showing Liquid Absorption at 9:45
W ater Sequence for Dec 7 1999
W avenum ber (cm -1)4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Inte
nsity
0
50
100
150
200
250
8:30 am9:45 am10:30 am
6500 drizzle featureNo drizzle
NIR Spectrum Showing Vapour,Liquid Water and Ice Absorptions
W a v e n u m b e r (c m -1 )6 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0
Tran
smis
sion
-0 .1
0 .0
0 .1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
0 .5
0 .6
liq u id w a te r tra n sm iss io nice tra n s m iss io nm e a s u re d c lo u d tra n sm iss io n (h e a vy c lo u d /lig h t c lo u d )
F ig u re 8 .4 : T h e tra n s m is s io n sp e c tru m o f h e a vy c lo u d m e a s u re d in th e n e a r in fra re d re g io n . A b so rp tio n b a n d s o f w a te r va p o u r, liq u id w a te r a n d ic e a re c le a rly e v id e n t in th e sp e c tru m , w h ic h w a s m e a su re d a t a re so lu tio n o f 1 6 cm -1.
w a te rva p o u r
w a te rva p o u r
w a te r va p o u rice
liq u idw a te r
Comparison of Aircraft with Ground Spectra Showing Ice and Liquid Water Absorption
MODTRAN4 Simulation of Strong Absorption
Wavenumber (cm-1)4000 6000 8000 10000
Rad
ianc
e (W
/m2 c
m-1
)
-0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Measurement overcast cloud
MODTRAN with 2 mm distribution
MODTRAN with 12 µm distribution
Total and NIR pyranometers measuring the ratio of NIR/ Visible shortwave
radiation
Change in Ratio of NIR/Visible Short Wave Radiation due to Absorption by Cloud
N IR /to ta l (% )0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 8 3 0 3 2 3 4 3 6 3 8 4 0 4 2 4 4
Num
ber o
f Occ
urre
nces
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0F ig u re 7
clou
dy s
ky M
odtra
n si
mul
atio
n
clea
r sky
Mod
tran
sim
ulat
ion
Droplet size distribution in rain
Estimate of path length of rain drops from rainfall rate
• Assume rainfall rate is 6 mm/hour• and there is enough liquid water to rain for 10 minutes • (from fall velocity of drops at 1 m/sec and 600 m cloud)• then there is about 1mm thickness of water • in large drops available for strong NIR absorption• multiply by path length factor of secant 60 0• gives 2 mm path length of liquid water
Estimate of absorption by 2 mm of liquid water in rain
• Rain rate gave 2mm path length of liquid water = l• Optical Depth = kx l = 10/cm x 0.2 cm = 2.0 OD• Transmission = e- OD = .135• Absorption = 1.0 - Transmission = .864• Energy abs = Absn x flux =.864 x 100W/m2 = 86 W/m2• Since NIR flux available for absorption = 100W/m2• (under thick cloud)
Combined satellite radar image of precipitating clouds
Abstraction of Absorbed Flux
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 150000.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
B
A
A
bsor
bed
Ene
rgy
( W
/ m
2 c
m -1
)
W avenumber (cm-1)A comparison of the energy absorbed primarily by liquid water in very heavy overcast cloud (curve A) and the modelled result of a liquid water in a 1 km thick stratus cloud at a resolution of 50 cm-1 (curve B). The spectrally integrated liquid water absorption was determ ined to be 80.0 W /m2 for the observed and 95.5 W /m2 for the modelled results [Davies et al., 1984].
Heavy overcast cloud
model
CONCLUSIONS a• Measurements of NIR spectra of cloudy skies indicate precipitation
strongly absorbs NIR radiation. This effect is not included in models.• Precipitation spectra matches absorption fingerprint of liquid water.• A measurement of garden hose spray shows droplets absorb like bulk
liquid water.• The measured radiance spectrum of rain shows strong NIR absorption• The absorption spectrum observed in transmission of drizzling fog ,
indicating absorption by drizzle in clouds.• The spectral signature of liquid water absorption observed in drizzle clouds
on the AIRS project.• Rain droplet distribution measurements indicate that precipitation contains
over 1 mm of liquid water. • Physics shows that 1 mm can absorb over 100W/m2 of NIR radiation. • Precipitation from clouds frequently includes Virga. • Absorption of NIR short wave by precipitation is a missing factor in GCMs,
regional climate models and forecast models. This strong NIR absorption is missing in current radiation schemes.
• Simulations are needed to test the impact of this error in models .