Date post: | 03-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | elisah-mugwagwa |
View: | 174 times |
Download: | 0 times |
I. Predictions
II. Climate change-security nexusI. Human security
II. National security
III. International security
IV. Ecological security
III. Climate change-foreign policy nexusI. State practices
II. Water wars
III. Climate change refugees
IV. Are ‘climate wars’ justified?
V. Conclusions and recommendations
Climate Change (CC) & International Security
UNSC debates 2007, 2011, UNGA, 2009; UNEP, 2007;UNDP, 2007
EU, US, UK, Aus, Rus, Fin and Ger.
Climate change ‘will fuel more conflicts for decades [Obama, 2009]:
ARE ‘CLIMATE WARS’ PREDICTIONS JUSTIFIED, IN LIGHT OF FOREIGN POLICY PRACTICE?
WHAT WILL HAPPEN
Temps. will rise 1.8 - 4o Celsius by the end of the century, if not mitigated [ IPCC, 2007]
IMPACTSRising sea levels, floods, storms, violent and volatile weather, famine, water shortages [e.g. IPCC, 2007; The Economist, 2010]
Uproot millions of people [TheEconomist, 2013]
Fuel conflicts for decades [Obama, 2009]
Chaos and violence [Paskal, TheEconomist, 2010]
Threats to sovereignty and territorialintegrity [e.g. MacDonald, 2013]
Threats to human, national, internationaland ecological security
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, for example,
provides a summary of how climate change may affect human rights
conferred by different conventions:
undermine human security by reducing access to, and the quality of natural resources that are important to sustain livelihoods (Barnet & Adger, 2007)
threats to human life and dignity; and threats to the security of individuals and communities
[MacDonald, 2013]
challenge state responsibility for providing security to its population
[ibid]
global inequality and poverty to build individual and community preparedness and resilience [Brown &McLeman, 2009]
According to MacDonald, 2013:
present a serious threat to the security and prosperity of nation states.
The preservation of national sovereignty and territorial boundaries from
internal and external threat is paramount
The national security establishment must anticipate such threats to
territorial integrity and secure national interests (Brzoska M, 2010)
focuses on internationalism as a response to CC, and the need for global cooperation.
The point of reference is the international
community
lead to resources scarcity & environmental degradation which will exacerbate social and political tensions, conflicts and security problems at the international arena
response to international security threats include transition to low carbon economies, and technology diffusion, expertise and resources to developing countries to enhance their adaptive capacities
e.g. Secretary General Moon ; UNEP; UNDP (2007); UNSC
(2007, 2011); UNGA (2009)
IPCC (2007)
there is need to re-establish the
relationship between people and the
natural environment.
Life on Earth is profoundly affected by
the planet’s climate.
Animals, plants, and other living beings
around the globe are moving, some,
adapting, and, in some cases, dying as
a direct or indirect result of
environmental shifts .
to re-orient societal patterns and
behaviour: to rebalance the relationship
between people and their natural
environment, both man-made and
natural.
CC is not only global, but also multidimensional, invisible, unpredictable and international [Drexhage et al., 2007]
Military Tool
Political Tool
Terrorism
Development tool
an issue for preventive diplomacy
conduct of foreign policy must involve anticipating threshold moments when latent conflicts may erupt and translate into violence
impact of climate change is projected to be more pronounced on two main issues: water and climate refugees [MacDonald, 2013]
‘water wars’ prediction :countries will wage war to safeguard their access to water
resources, especially if there is water scarcity, competitive use and the countries are
enemies due to a wider conflict [Allam, 2003]
water is scarce , in constant high demand, straddles political boundaries, its
availability fluctuates in space and time, it has no substitute [Wolf, 1998]
Middle East region has 5% of the world’s population, but only one percent of the
world’s renewable water resources.
About 60 percent of the available freshwater is in transboundary basins.
River Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates river valleys are the main sources of water in the
Middle East(SIWI, 2010).
Despite depleted water resources and growing water demand pushed by population
growth, international relations over water have, if anything, become less tense since
1970 [Allan, 2002]
Many authors predict that the impact of CC in the near future will
become overwhelming & calls for international law practitioners &
states to formulate policies to deal with CC induced refugees
especially in fragile states
HOW HAS THE CONDUCT OF FOREIGN POLICY DEALT WITH WATER AND
CLIMATE REFUGEE ISSUES? ARE ‘CLIMATE WARS’ JUSTIFIED?
‘Water Wars’
Cooperation
Preventive diplomacy
‘sticky’ legal framework on
international water law
Climate Change Refugees:
[Goodwin-Gill. 1996]:
one must have crossed an international
border;
one must be fleeing persecution;
persecution must be for reasons of race,
religion, nationality, membership of a
particular social group or political
opinion; and
one must be unable or unwilling to the
protection of the country of origin or to
return there.
Complementary Protection
AU & Cartagena Declaration in Latin
America : refugee status can be
granted to people fleeing from ‘events
seriously disturbing the public order’ e.g. Congolese fleeing the eruption of Mount Nyiragongo in January 2002 sought refuge in Rwanda
Trail Smelter Arbitration: United States v
Canada
‘Water Wars’ are not justified
Climate refugees can be managed under current state practices
The assumptions of CC wars are rhetoric - not grounded in reality
Climate refugees not covered under current refugee law however,
complimentary protection and humanitarian considerations ensure that
there is protection
Strengthen refugee law to give explicit protection to CC refugees
Work citedAlam, U. Z. (2002), Questioning the water wars rationale: a case study of the Indus Waters Treaty. The Geographical Journal, 168:
341–353
Aljazeera, 2012 ‘Risk of Water Wars Rises with scarcity’ Web. 26 Aug. 2012. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/06/2011622193147231653.html
Allan, J.A. Hydro-Peace in the Middle East: Why no Water Wars? A Case Study of the Jordan River Basin. SAIS Review vol. XXII no. 2 (Summer–Fall 2002)
Biermann, F. & Boas, I. 2009. Preparing for a warmer world: Towards a Global Governance to Protect Climate Change Refugees. Global Environmental Politics.10 (1). pp. 60-88.
‘‘Climate Wars,’’ The Economist, July 8, 2010.
Dyer, G. ‘Climate Wars,’ (Toronto: Random House, 2008);
Goodarzi J. “Water Tensions in the Middle East” Webster Security Forum Conference. 8 February 2013
McAdam, J. 2011. Climate Change Displacement and International Law: Complementary Protection Standards. Legal and Protection Policy Research Series. Division of International Protection. UNHCR
McDonald M. Discourses of Climate Security. Political Geography Vol. 33, pp. 42-51, 2013
Moon, B. A climate Culprit in Darfur: Washington Post, 16th June 2007.
UNEP. Sudan: Post-conflict Environmental Assessment. Nairobi: UNEP.
UNDP. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. New York. Palgrave
UNGA. Climate Change and its possible security implications: Report of the Secretary General. New York: UNGA.
Tertrais, B. “The Climate Wars Myth,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, Summer 2011, pp. 17–29.