Date post: | 30-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | camilla-lewis |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The FERC Review Process
and The Importance of Safe Pipeline and LNG
Terminal Operation
NASFM Annual Meeting- July 8, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FERC
2
Who is FERC?
• Independent Regulatory Commission
• Five members– Appointed by the President– Confirmed by the Senate
FERC
3
Natural gas – a critical sourceNatural gas – a critical source of energy and raw material of energy and raw material
• Vital to the US Economy• ¼ of U.S. energy requirements• environmental fuel of Choice and regulation• provides about 19% of electric generation• residential customers --60 million in 2001• U.S. industries- over 40% of all primary
energy • Industrial consumption, up by almost 48%
from 1986 to 2001. Increase continues…..• Production U.S. lower-48 and non-Arctic
Canada flat to declining,• LNG and Arctic gas will become the major
supply source, providing 20-25% of U.S. demand by 2025.
• And lastly……..
FERC
4
Over 90 percent of the 185 GW of new Over 90 percent of the 185 GW of new electric generation since June 2001 is electric generation since June 2001 is
natural gasnatural gas
Source: Derived from Platts POWERmap
FERC
5
Safety?– How Important?
• Essential• Prevention is Possible• Compliance
– Design Standards & Review– No Dig Rules– Testing and Repair Rules
• Inspection
28
CONSTRUCTEDA. Everett, MA : 1.035 Bcfd (Tractebel - DOMAC)B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion - Cove Point LNG)C. Elba Island, GA : 0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG)D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG)E. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate
Energy)APPROVED BY FERC1. Lake Charles, LA: 1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy)3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express)*4. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel)*5. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev.)6. Sabine, LA : 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG)7. Elba Island, GA: 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG)8. Corpus Christi, TX: 2.6 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG)9. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil)10. Fall River, MA : 0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG)11. Sabine, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass - ExxonMobil)APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD12. Port Pelican: 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)13. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing - Shell)CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS14. St. John, NB : 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil)15. Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG - Anadarko)MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS16. Altamira, Tamulipas : 0.7 Bcfd, (Shell/Total/Mitsui)17. Baja California, MX : 1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra & Shell)18. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)PROPOSED TO FERC19. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy
Solutions)20. Logan Township, NJ : 1.2 Bcfd (Crown Landing LNG - BP)21. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (Seafarer - El Paso/FPL )22. Corpus Christi, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental Energy
Ventures)23. Port Arthur, TX: 1.5 Bcfd (Sempra)24. Cove Point, MD : 0.8 Bcfd (Dominion)25. LI Sound, NY: 1.0 Bcfd (Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell)26. Pascagoula, MS: 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy LLC)27. Bradwood, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star LNG - Northern Star Natural
Gas LLC)28. Pascagoula, MS: 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing - ChevronTexaco)29. Cameron, LA: 3.3 Bcfd (Creole Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG)30. Port Lavaca, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG Partners)31. Freeport, TX: 2.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion)PROPOSED TO MARAD/COAST GUARD33. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton)33. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy)34. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Main Pass McMoRan Exp.)35. Gulf of Mexico: 1.0 Bcfd (Compass Port - ConocoPhillips)36. Gulf of Mexico: 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing - ExxonMobil)37. Gulf of Mexico: 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon Port Clean Energy Terminal -
ConocoPhillips)38. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG - Tractebel)39. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.8 Bcfd (Northeast Gateway - Excelerate
Energy)
Existing and Proposed North American LNG
Terminals
As of June 30, 2005
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
A
3 421
3219
34
33
13
23
B
1
24
3522
US Jurisdiction
FERC US Coast Guard* US pipeline approved; LNG terminal pending in Bahamas
26
102520
29
7C
2D1123
36
3712
5,31
9
6
3827
E
14
16
15
1718
30
39
8
POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS40. Coos Bay, OR: 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy Projects Development)41. Somerset, MA: 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG)42. California - Offshore: 0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)43. Pleasant Point, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC)44. St. Helens, OR: 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC)45. Galveston, TX: 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island - BP)46. Philadelphia, PA: 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom Energy Center - PGW)47. Astoria, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Skipanon LNG - Calpine)POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS48. Quebec City, QC : 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz Met/Gaz de France)49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC: 0.5 Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada)50. Kitimat, BC: 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG)51. Prince Rupert, BC: 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac Terminals)52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic Petrochemicals)POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS53. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol)54. Puerto Libertad, MX: 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific LNG)55. Offshore Gulf, MX: 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado - Tidelands)56. Manzanillo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd 57. Topolobampo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd
Potential North AmericanLNG Terminals
As of June 30, 2005
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
43
42
40
US Jurisdiction
FERC US Coast Guard
41
46
45
4447
55
4849
5150
52
53
54
56
57
FERC
8
LNG Review Process
Notice of Application
Interventions/ Protests
Notice of Intent
Scoping Meeting / Site Visit
Data Requests, Analysis & Agency Coordination
Issue DEIS
Public Meeting / Comments
Issue FEIS
Authorization / Denial
Safety & Engineering
Cryogenic Design &Safety Review
Technical Conference
Waterway Suitability Assessment
Waterway Suitability Report
USCG Letter of Recommendation(issued independently)
FERC
9
Pre-Filing Process –Increased Public
Involvement More interactive NEPA/permitting process, no
shortcuts Earlier, more direct interaction between FERC,
other agencies, landowners Time savings realized only if we are working
together with stakeholders FERC/Agency staff are advocates of the
Process, not the Project! Goal of “no surprises”
FERC
10
Timelines: Traditional vs.
Pre-Filing ProcessAnnounce
OpenSeason
AnnounceOpen
Season
Develop
StudyCorrido
r
DevelopStudy
Corridor
Approve PF
Request, Conduct Scoping
Conduct
Scoping
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Review DraftResource Reports& Prepare DEIS
IssueDraftEIS
IssueDraftEIS
FileAt
FERC
IssueOrder
IssueOrder
FileAt
FERC
Prepare ResourceReports
Prepare ResourceReports
IssueFinalEIS
IssueFinalEIS
Traditional - Applicant
Traditional - FERC
NEPA Pre-Filing - Applicant
NEPA Pre-Filing - FERC
ApplicationComplete
(months)
FERC
11
Opportunities for Public Involvement
The FERC Process: Issue Notice of the
Application Project Sponsor
Sends Landowner Notification Package
Issue Notice of Intent to Prepare the NEPA Document (i.e., scoping)
Hold Scoping Meetings
Public Input: File an Intervention;
register for e-subscription
Contact the project sponsor w/questions, concerns; contact FERC
Send letters expressing concerns about environmental impact
Attend scoping meetings
FERC
12
Opportunities for Public Involvement
The FERC Process: Issue Notice of
Availability of the DEIS
Hold Public Meetings on DEIS
Issue a Commission Order
Public Input: File comments on
the adequacy of DEIS
Attend public meetings to give comments on DEIS
Interveners can file a request for Rehearing of a Commission Order
FERC
13
Interagency Agreements
Agreement for Environmental Review of Natural Gas Facilities
Signed May 2002 Signed by 10 Federal agencies with
jurisdiction or expertise Establishes FERC as lead agency for
environmental review Ensures early participation and cooperation Work with schedule set by FERC
FERC
14
Interagency Agreements
Agreement for LNG Safety and Security
Signed January 2004 by FERC, USCG, DOT
Defines roles and responsibilities
Establishes FERC as lead for environmental
review
Stresses coordination, seamless review
Coordination continues from initial review
through construction and operation
Includes terminal facilities and ships
FERC
15
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Onshore Facility Safety
Compliance with 49 CFR Part 193 and NFPA 59A
Cryogenic Design and Technical Review – Report 13
Exclusion Zones – Thermal Radiation and Flammable Vapor
Seismic design review
FERC
18
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Cryogenic Design Review
Process Flow and Material Balance Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams LNG Storage Tank Design Hazard Detection and Emergency
Shutdown Systems Hazard Control – Fire Water, Dry Chemical, High Expansion Foam Technical Conference
FERC
19
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Marine Traffic and Vessel Safety
Compliance with 33 CFR Part 127
Letter of Intent to initiate U.S. Coast Guard Letter of Recommendation
June 2005 NVIC Marine Safety Analysis
– Thermal Radiation and Flammable Vapor Hazards
Vessel Traffic Congestion
FERC
20
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Spill rates from cargo tank holes
Spread of unconfined pool on water
Vapor generation from spills on water
Thermal radiation from fires
Flammable vapor dispersion
ABSG Report – Models for CalculatingSite-Specific Hazards
FERC
21
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Accidental breach scenario conclusions: Groundings and low speed collisions - no
cargo spill High speed collisions - 0.5 to 1.5 m2 cargo
tank hole
Intentional breach scenario conclusions: Cargo tanks holes range from 2 to 12 m2 Nominal tank hole size of 5 – 7 m2
Sandia Report –Cargo Tank Breach
Analysis
FERC
22
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Zone 1 - significant impacts to public safety / property within 500 meters (1,640 feet) due to thermal hazards from a fire.
Zone 2 – transition to less severe thermal hazard levels to public safety / property - 500 to 1,600 meters.
Zone 3 - lower public health and safety impacts beyond 1,600 meters (5,250 feet).
Large, unignited LNG vapor cloud unlikely, but could extend to 2,500 meters (8,200 feet).
Sandia Report –General Hazard
Analysis
FERC
23
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Cargo hole sizes/scenarios - Sandia Report
Site-specific hazard calculations - ABSG
Report
Risk-based management options - Sandia
Report
Application of ABSG and Sandia Reports to LNG
Project Review
FERC
24
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
LNG Release and Spread
Hole Area 0.8 meters2 5 meters2 7 meters2 12 meters2
Hole Diameter 1.0 meter 2.5 meters 3.0 meters 3.9 meters
Spill Time 94 minutes 15 minutes 10.6 minutes 6.1 minutes
Pool Fire Calculations
Maximum Pool Radius
340 feet 817 feet 935 feet 1,103 feet
Fire Duration 94 minutes 15 minutes 10.8 minutes 6.5 minutes
Distance to:
1,600 BTU/ft2-hr 2,200 feet 4,340 feet 4,810 feet 5,476 feet
3,000 BTU/ft2-hr 1,710 feet 3,330 feet 3,701 feet 4,206 feet
10,000 BTU/ft2-hr 1,040 feet 1,970 feet 2,174 feet 2,459 feet
Site-Specific HazardCalculations
FERC
25
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
NVIC (June 14, 2005)
Waterway Suitability Assessment (WSA)
Validation of WSA through Port Committees
(i.e. – Area Maritime Security Committee)
Waterway Suitability Report for DEIS
Security Resource Requirements for DEIS
Letter of Recommendation follows FEIS
FERC
26
Company files monthly progress reports during construction.
Review of final design and changes by FERC.
Clearances for design/construction changes by Director of OEP.
Site inspections by FERC during major construction activity.
Authorization to commence service from Director of OEP.
Oversight of Construction
FERC
27
Reporting Requirements: Semi-annual reports of plant activities,
maintenance, and problems Immediate notification of serious accidents
Operating Inspections: Inspect condition of all major plant
equipment Review plant operations; maintenance Review changes in design; operations; safety
systems Inspect security measures Update Cryogenic Design and Inspection
Manual
Monitoring Operations
FERC
28
Opportunities For Fire Officials
• Public Notices/Meetings• Cryogenic Design Reviews• NVIC• Emergency Response Plans• LNG Pilot Program• Pre-Filing Consultations• _______________________
FERC
29
28
CONSTRUCTEDA. Everett, MA : 1.035 Bcfd (Tractebel - DOMAC)B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion - Cove Point LNG)C. Elba Island, GA : 0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG)D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG)E. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate
Energy)APPROVED BY FERC1. Lake Charles, LA: 1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy)3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express)*4. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel)*5. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev.)6. Sabine, LA : 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG)7. Elba Island, GA: 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG)8. Corpus Christi, TX: 2.6 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG)9. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil)10. Fall River, MA : 0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG)11. Sabine, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass - ExxonMobil)APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD12. Port Pelican: 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)13. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing - Shell)CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS14. St. John, NB : 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil)15. Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG - Anadarko)MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS16. Altamira, Tamulipas : 0.7 Bcfd, (Shell/Total/Mitsui)17. Baja California, MX : 1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra & Shell)18. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)PROPOSED TO FERC19. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy
Solutions)20. Logan Township, NJ : 1.2 Bcfd (Crown Landing LNG - BP)21. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (Seafarer - El Paso/FPL )22. Corpus Christi, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental Energy
Ventures)23. Port Arthur, TX: 1.5 Bcfd (Sempra)24. Cove Point, MD : 0.8 Bcfd (Dominion)25. LI Sound, NY: 1.0 Bcfd (Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell)26. Pascagoula, MS: 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy LLC)27. Bradwood, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star LNG - Northern Star Natural
Gas LLC)28. Pascagoula, MS: 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing - ChevronTexaco)29. Cameron, LA: 3.3 Bcfd (Creole Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG)30. Port Lavaca, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG Partners)31. Freeport, TX: 2.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion)PROPOSED TO MARAD/COAST GUARD32. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton)33. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy)34. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Main Pass McMoRan Exp.)35. Gulf of Mexico: 1.0 Bcfd (Compass Port - ConocoPhillips)36. Gulf of Mexico: 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing - ExxonMobil)37. Gulf of Mexico: 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon Port Clean Energy Terminal -
ConocoPhillips)38. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG - Tractebel)39. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.8 Bcfd (Northeast Gateway - Excelerate
Energy)
Existing and Proposed North American LNG
Terminals
As of July 1, 2005
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
A
3 421
3219
34
33
13
23
B
1
24
35
US Jurisdiction
FERC US Coast Guard* US pipeline approved; LNG terminal pending in Bahamas
26
102520
29
7C
2D1123
36
3712
5,31
9
6
3827
E
14
16
15
1718
39
822
30
FERC
30
POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS40. Coos Bay, OR: 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy Projects Development)41. Somerset, MA: 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG)42. California - Offshore: 0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco)43. Pleasant Point, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC)44. St. Helens, OR: 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC)45. Galveston, TX: 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island - BP)46. Philadelphia, PA: 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom Energy Center - PGW)47. Astoria, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Skipanon LNG - Calpine)POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS48. Quebec City, QC : 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz Met/Gaz de France)49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC: 0.5 Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada)50. Kitimat, BC: 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG)51. Prince Rupert, BC: 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac Terminals)52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic Petrochemicals)POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS53. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol)54. Puerto Libertad, MX: 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific LNG)55. Offshore Gulf, MX: 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado - Tidelands)56. Manzanillo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd 57. Topolobampo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd
Potential North AmericanLNG Terminals
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
43
42
40
US Jurisdiction
FERC US Coast Guard
41
46
45
4447
55
4849
5150
52
53
54
56
57
As of July 1, 2005
FERC
31
LNG Onshore Project Status -
Approved Projects*
* Status as of July 1, 2005
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
Applications Approved: Status of Construction
• Trunkline, Lake Charles Expansion (CP02-60) #1 Underway, Service 4th Q ’05
• Sempra, Cameron LNG (CP02-374) #2 Underway, Amendment
Authorized
• AES, Ocean Express Pipeline (CP02-90) #3 Amendment Authorized
• Tractebel, Calypso Pipeline (CP01-409) #4 Pending
• Freeport LNG (CP03-75) #5 Construction Clearance Authorized
FERC
32
Applications Approved: Status of Construction
• Cheniere LNG - Sabine, LA (CP04-47) #6 Authorized
• Southern LNG – Elba Island (CP02-380) #7 Underway
• Cheniere, Corpus Christi (CP04-37) #8 Pending
• Vista Del Sol, Corpus Christi (CP04-395) #9 Pending
• Weaver’s Cove Energy, Fall River (CP04-36) #10 Pending
• Exxon Mobil, Golden Pass (CP04-386) #11 Pending
LNG Onshore Project Status -
Approved Projects*
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
* Status as of July 1, 2005
FERC
33
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
As of July 1, 2005
Rejected LNG Onshore Projects
Applications Rejected:
• Keyspan, Providence (CP04-223)
FERC
34
Onshore LNG Project Status*
Pre-Filing:
• Broadwater, LI Sound (PF05-04) #25
• Gulf Energy, Pascagoula (PF05-05) #26
• Casotte Landing, Pascagoula (PF05-09) #28
• Creole Trail, Cameron (PF05-08) #29
• Northern Star, Bradwood (PF05-10) #27
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
* Status as of July 1, 2005
FERC
35
Applications Filed:
• Working on DEIS
- Sound Energy Solutions, Long Beach (PF03-6,
CP04-58) #19
- Sempra, Port Arthur (PF04-11, CP05-83) #23
- Calhoun LNG, Port Lavaca (CP05-91) #30
- Dominion, Cove Point (PF04-15, CP05-130) #24
- Freeport Expansion (CP05-361) #31
Onshore LNG Project Status*
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
* Status as of July 1, 2005
FERC
36
Applications Filed:
• Working on FEIS
– BP, Crown Landing (PF04-2, CP04-411) #20
– Ingleside/Occidental, Corpus Christi (CP05-11)
#22
Onshore LNG Project Status*
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
* Status as of July 1, 2005
FERC
37
Filed at FERC :
• El Paso, Seafarer (PF04-08, CP05-25) #21
• Excelerate Energy, Northeast Gateway (CP05-383) #39
Applications Filed:
• Working on DEIS with USCG
• Freeport-McMoran, Main Pass (CP04-68) #34
Working ON FEIS with USCG
• Conoco Phillips, Compass Port (CP04-114) #35
• Exxon Mobil, Pearl Crossing (CP04-374) #36
LNG Project Status -Associated Pipelines*
FERC
Office of Energy Projects
* Status as of July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
38
Pleasant Point, ME (43)
Everett, MA (A)
Offshore Boston - Neptune (38)
Fall River, MA (10)
Somerset, MA (41)
Legend:
Existing Terminal
Approved Terminal
Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing
Proposed Terminal: Filed
Working on DEIS
Working on FEIS
Potential Terminal
North East LNG Terminals
July 1, 2005
Offshore Boston - Excelerate (39)
Providence, RI Rejected
Office of Energy Projects
39
Legend:
Existing Terminal
Approved Terminal
Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing
Proposed Terminal: Filed
Working on DEIS
Working on FEIS
Potential TerminalCove Point, MD (B/24)
Logan Township, NJ (20)
Mid-Atlantic LNG Terminals
Long Island Sound, NY (25)
Philadelphia, PA (46)
July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
40
South East LNG Terminals
Elba Island, GA (C/7)
Bahamas (3/4/21)
Legend:
Existing Terminal
Approved Terminal
Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing
Proposed Terminal: Filed
Working on DEIS
Working on FEIS
Potential Terminal
(Pipelines only)
July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
41
Corpus Christi, TX (8)
Lake Charles, LA (D/1)
Port Pelican (12)
Pearl Crossing (36)
Freeport, TX (5/31)
Golden Pass (11)
Port Lavaca, TX (30)
Port Arthur (23)
Sabine Pass, LA (6)
Gulf Coast LNG Terminals
Freeport McMoran (34)
Hackberry (2)
Gulf Landing (13)
Compass Port (35)
Legend:
Existing Terminal
Approved Terminal
Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing
Proposed Terminal: Filed
Working on DEIS
Working on FEIS
Potential Terminal
Galveston, TX (45)
Pascagoula, MS (26/28)
Cameron (29)
BeaconPort (37)
Gulf Gateway (E)Vista Del Sol (9) Ingleside LNG (22)
July 1, 2005
Office of Energy Projects
42
Long Beach, CA (19)California Offshore (32/33/42)
Southwest LNG Terminals
Chevron Texaco (42)
BHP Billiton (32)
Crystal Energy (33)
Legend:
Existing Terminal
Approved Terminal
Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing
Proposed Terminal: Filed
Working on DEIS
Working on FEIS
Potential Terminal
July 1, 2005