Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
2 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Content
Context SDL (Strategy, Requirements & Assumptions) ANDROMAC On-going work
3 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Context (1/2) Andromac
ANDROMAC:Powerfull tool to optimise the descent trajectory profile of Philae
Inputs: gravity potential and outgassing environment ephemerides, comet geometry
Outputs: Determination of the descent trajectory: nominal case, Determination of the backup descent trajectories: FDIR cases, Robustness and Monte Carlo analysis of the trajectories.
4 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Context (2/2) Laboratories involved
Outgassing and dust production model :
Service d’Aéronomie, LESIA
Gravity potential model :
Groupe de Recherche en Géodésie Spatiale CNES/CNRS GRGS
Geometry / shape of the comet :
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille LAM
Mechanical stability of the Lander :
Max-Plank-Institut für Aeronomie
5 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Content
Context SDL
StrategyRequirementsAssumptions
ANDROMAC On-going work
6 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Strategy
Orbiter / Lander separation manœuvre Vmss
=> Modification of the Orbiter trajectory
(post delivery orbit)
7 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Strategy
ADS : active descent system
Two feasible strategies :Two feasible strategies :• passive (without ADS manouvre)• active (with ADS manouver)
8 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Requirements (1/2) Landing after 2 months of global mapping/close observation (2014)Landing after 2 months of global mapping/close observation (2014)
Distance to the Sun:Distance to the Sun:~ 3 UA (outgassing and electrical power)
Séparation Manœuvre Séparation Manœuvre Vmss :Vmss : module : [ 0.05 m/s ; 0.539 m/s ] : nominal case module : 0.17 m/s : backup case fixed orientation towards the Lander X axis (or -X Orbiter)
ADS Manœuvre ADS Manœuvre Vads :Vads : module : [ 0.05 m/s ; 1 m/s ] (hold-down thrust after touch down not included) fixed orientation towards the Lander -Z axis
Lander shall be in a rotational motion around its Z axis during the descent Lander shall be in a rotational motion around its Z axis during the descent phasephase
9 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Requirements (2/2)
Safe pre-delivery orbitSafe pre-delivery orbit : : no Sun eclipses visibility between Earth stations and Orbiter
Separation altitudeSeparation altitude :: maximum between 1 km and 1 comet radius
Distance betweenDistance between Vmss and Vmss and Vads :Vads : 100 m minimum
Maximal descent duration :Maximal descent duration : 3 hours
Maximum impact velocity :Maximum impact velocity : 1.2 m/s
post-delivery orbitpost-delivery orbit : : no impact trajectory for the orbiter … …..
10 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Assumptions (1/3) Nucleus shape Hubble Space Telescope Observations in March 2003:Hubble Space Telescope Observations in March 2003:
Construction of an overall 3D-model of the comet nucleus [Lamy 2007]
Main characteristics:Main characteristics: Nucleus volume equivalent to that of a 1.72 km1.72 km
radius sphere Presence of humpshumps (high radius) and hollowshollows (low
radius) Density ~ 370 Kg/m3 Albedo =0.04 Spin period of 12.6 hours and
no rotational state
11 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Assumptions (2/3) Forces
Gravitational Force The comet nucleus is homogeneous, i.e. constant density 370 Kg/m3 Gravitational acceleration: maximum value of 5.5e-4 m/s2 = 2.2529e+03 m3/s2
Outgassing Force presence of H2O and CO
gas production rate 1e+27 molecules/s regular and steady state
Dust pression Force neglected for the moment Studies on going
12 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Assumptions (3/3) constraints
Optimization criterion:Optimization criterion:modulus of impact velocity or descent duration
Main mission constraints:Main mission constraints: V impact 1.2 m/s1.2 m/s 30 mn descent duration 3 hours 1 km1 km release altitude 0.05 m/s Vmss 0.529 m/s 0.529 m/s (the updated value is 0.539 LID-B lv)(the updated value is 0.539 LID-B lv) 0.05 m/s Vads 1.0 m/s 1.0 m/s constrained direction of MSS maneuver (collinear to orbiter X-axis) constrained direction of ADS maneuver (collinear to Lander Z-axis) Lander Z-axis collinear to the local surface normal (landing site)
Control parameters:Control parameters: execution dates and magnitudes of MSS and ADS maneuvers orbital parameters of delivery orbit
13 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Content
Context SDL (Strategy, Requirements & Assumptions)
ANDROMAC On-going work
14 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
ANDROMAC (1/2)
Shape
Outgassing
Gravity field
Ephemerides
Landing siteOrbiter’s post-orbit
Final purpose
A) Inputs generation
B) Trajectories extrapolation
Undetermined calculus
C) Optimisation method
Best trajectory for each landing site
D) Robustness analysis
Feasibility of the landing site
E) Non-nominal scenariosBackup trajectories
15 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
ANDROMAC(2/2)
Conclusions :Conclusions : Descent trajectories computation: nominal and backup cases Optimal trajectories : duration, impact velocity... robustness of the solutions : Monte Carlo analysis Feasible solutions after the close observation phase
16 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
Content
Context SDL (Strategy, Requirements & Assumptions)
ANDROMAC On-going work
17 LSWT meeting, Venice, 30/03-01/04/2009
On-going work
NEXT MISSION ANALYSE Currently working on inputs consolidation Presentation foreseen for July’09 at next SWTM
ANDROMAC Improvements on-going
New models (shape, gravity and outgassing) More perturbations in the montecarlo analysis ( rotational
period, position and motion of pole axis) New constraints
Operational adaptation