+ All Categories
Home > Documents > “The Great Crow Fallacy”

“The Great Crow Fallacy”

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: alaina
View: 32 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
“The Great Crow Fallacy”. A reader response to a chapter from unSpun By: Brad Saunders and Cole Rosenbaum. It’s Clinically Proven!!!. This presentation is clinically proven to raise grades on tests in AP Lang. Take notes!. Overview. The Article Connection to 1984 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
A READER RESPONSE TO A CHAPTER FROM UNSPUN BY: BRAD SAUNDERS AND COLE ROSENBAUM “The Great Crow Fallacy”
Transcript
Page 1: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

A READER RESPONSE TO A CHAPTER FROM UNSPUN

BY: BRAD SAUNDERS AND COLE ROSENBAUM

“The Great Crow Fallacy”

Page 2: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

It’s Clinically Proven!!!

This presentation is clinically proven to raise grades on tests in AP Lang. Take notes!

Page 3: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Overview

The ArticleConnection to 1984Connection to Weasel WordsContemporary ExamplesMLA Citation

Page 4: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article

Story ≠ Data Don’t confuse anecdotes with data

Anecdote: a usually short narrative of an interesting, amusing, or biographical incident (Marriam-Webster)

Crows Want repeated results through experimentation

Page 5: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Perspectives don’t always show the whole picture Personal experiences are very narrow Impact of media and government

What you’re not told can be more important

Page 6: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Emotions can cloud an argument. Dramatic stories yield attention Football players and fertilizer

Page 7: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Some studies are more accurate than others. Who stands behind the information? Does the source have motivation? What data collecting methods were used? Age of data? Any assumptions? Any guesswork? Want “convergent evidence”

Page 8: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Repetition ≠ Truth Groups repeat ideas, especially involving fear Causes people to believe claim is true Crippling death tax bills

Only 1.17% of estates taxed

Page 9: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

A huge claim requires huge evidence. Groups exaggerate data to make extraordinary claims In order for extraordinary claims to have substance,

must be proportionally supported

Page 10: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

The myth of “Clinically Proven” Replicated results needed Quality of the test Cold-Eeze

Page 11: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Expertise is non-transferable. Just because you’re a doctor on TV does not make you

knowledgeable in the field of medicine Analyze what background endorsers actually have

Page 12: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

The Article (cont.)

Appeals to popularity Why…

“top-selling” “number one” “preferred over…”

Large marketing budget, supply…

Page 13: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Connection to 1984

Don’t always see whole picture Party limits what citizens of Oceania see Leads to incorrect conclusions Example from unSpun

Gulf War and smart bombs

Page 14: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Seeing vs. Believing

Page 15: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Connection to 1984 (cont.)

Use of dramatic stories Constant drama and triumph of wars Keeps citizens caught up in commotion and keeps

them enthusiastic

Page 16: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Connection to 1984 (cont.)

Saying it doesn’t make it true Repetition throughout Oceania

Big Brother War is Peace Freedom is Slavery Ignorance is Strenght

Page 17: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Connection to Weasel Words

Main Ideas Groups with motivation will manipulate evidence Claims/evidence are falsified lead audience to draw

conclusions As the audience, we must analyze sources A world without analyzing sources is Oceania

Page 18: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Contemporary Example #1

President Obama’s State of the Union speech Number of Americans currently working

Obama: 2 million Americans currently have jobs

Obama’s Economic Advisers: 1.5 million CBO: between 800,000 and 2.4 million IHS: 1.25 million Macroeconomic Advisers: 1.1 million Moody’s economy.com: 1.6 million

Page 19: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Contemporary Example #1 (cont.)

Bringing down health care deficit Obama claimed CBO could bring deficit down to $1

trillion over the next 20 years CBO reported that it could be as little as half of Obama’s

number for the same 20 A very rough estimate: CBO generally projects for a 10

year max Projected deficit

Obama claimed a $3 trillion deficit when he took office + a total deficit of $8 trillion in 10 years

CBO projected a deficit of $1.2 trillion by the end of the year + a total deficit of $3.1 trillion in 10 years

Page 20: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Contemporary Examples (cont.)

John Kerry’s exaggerated cost of the Iraq War. Kerry claimed the cost to be above $200 billion CBO: cost of the military operations alone was $93.7

billion OMB: military operations + rebuilding Iraq +

supporting coalitions = $119 billion Kerry’s estimate included cost of the next year +

protecting U.S. cities + operations in Afghanistan Not mentioned in his speech

Page 21: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

Wrap Up

Studies aren’t always accurateSources aren’t always honest

TOP SELLING

PREFERRED OVER…

CLINICALLY

TESTED

Page 22: “The Great Crow Fallacy”

MLA Citation

Eschholz, Paul, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. “Weasel Words: The Art of Saying Nothing at All.”

Language Awareness. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2005. 442-452. Print. Excerpt from

Doublespeak. By William Lutz. N.p.: n.p., n.d.

Jackson, Brooks, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. “The Great Crow Fallacy.” Unspun: Finding Facts in a World

of Disinformation. Illus. Signe Wilkinson. New York: Random , 2007. 105-125. Print.

"Kerry Exaggerates Cost of War in Iraq." FactCheck.org. Ed. Lori Robertson. Anneberg Political Fact Check.

Web. 09 Feb. 2010. <http://www.factcheck.org/kerry_exaggerates_cost_of_war_in_iraq.html>.

"Obama's State of the Union Address." FactCheck.org. Ed. Lori Robertson. Anneberg Political Fact Check.

Web. 09 Feb. 2010. <http://factcheck.org/2010/01/obamas-state-of-the-union-address/>.

Orwell, George. 1984. New York: Signet Classics, 1977. Print.


Recommended