FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON OFFICE OF July 27, 2015 THE CHAIRMAN The Honorable Yvette D. Clarke U.S. House of Representatives 2351 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congresswoman Clarke: Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views on this very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future. The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radio broadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcement matters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to those parties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100 pirate radio enforcement actions. As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirate investigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnight and on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordinatibn with local law enforcement officials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficulties in the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in 30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based on existing resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to public safety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters, including pirate radio.1 Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirate operators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quickly replaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resume broadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do not deter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures and obtain cheap replacement equipment online. Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved by enforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outside stakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy and enforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the Emergency Alert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Transcript
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Yvette D. ClarkeU.S. House of Representatives2351 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congresswoman Clarke:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordinatibn with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.1
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Yvette D. Clarke
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
er
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMM ISSION
WASHINGTON'WMIS0'
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Chris CollinsU.S. House of Representatives1117 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Collins:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Chris Collins
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Im W eeler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMANJuly 27, 2015
The Honorable Joseph CrowleyU.S. House of Representatives1436 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Crowley:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio. 1
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Joseph Crowley
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Tom Wheeler
((() FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Dan DonovanU.S. House of Representatives1725 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 205 15-3211
Dear Congressman Donovan:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Dan Donovan
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
eeler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Eliot L. EngelU.S. House of Representatives2161 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Engel:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Eliot L. Engel
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
er
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Chris GibsonU.S. House of Representatives1708 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Gibson:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Chris Gibson
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely
eeler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Richard HannaU.S. House of Representatives319 Cannon House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Hanna:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Richard Hanna
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely, /
ee1eT
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Brian HigginsU.S. House of Representatives2459 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Higgins:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Brian Higgins
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
eler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OFTHE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Steve IsraelU.S. House of Representatives2457 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Israel:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Steve Israel
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
om Wheeler
(i1) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Hakeem JeffriesU.S. House of Representatives1339 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Jeffries:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Hakeem Jeffries
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely
heeler
,-\((1) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable John KatkoU.S. House of Representatives1123 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Katko:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable John Katko
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Teeie'
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASH INGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Peter T. KingU.S. House of Representatives339 Cannon House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman King:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same maimer as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Peter T. King
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
cerel/
Tom Wheeler
r) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF
THE CHAIRMAN July 27, 2015
The Honorable Leonard LanceU.S. House of Representatives133 Cannon House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Lance:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Leonard Lance
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
om Wheeler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Nita M. LoweyU.S. House of Representatives2365 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congresswoman Lowey:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Nita M. Lowey
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Wheeler
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Carolyn B. MaloneyU.S. House of Representatives2308 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congresswoman Maloney:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.'
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Carolyn B. Maloney
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
FEDERAL COMMUNICATiONS CoMMissioN
WASHINGTON
OFFICE OF July 27, 2015THE CHAIRMAN
The Honorable Sean Patrick MaloneyU.S. House of Representatives1529 Longworth House Office BuildingWashington, D.C. 20515
Dear Congressman Maloney:
Thank you for your letter regarding pirate radio. I appreciate you sharing your views onthis very important issue and I look forward to working with you in the future.
The FCC is committed to enforcement of the rules prohibiting unlicensed radiobroadcasting. We approach the pirate radio issue in the same manner as other enforcementmatters, by focusing on the most egregious violators and those that provide support to thoseparties. This fiscal year, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau (EB) has issued more than 100pirate radio enforcement actions.
As you may know, pirate radio investigations are resource intensive -- a typical pirateinvestigation requires many hours of work by multiple EB field agents, often working overnightand on weekends in neighborhoods that require close coordination with local law enforcementofficials to ensure staff safety. The time and expense of these cases present particular difficultiesin the current flat budget environment, where the Commission's staffing is at its lowest point in30 years and overtime is less available. Accordingly, we must prioritize our work based onexisting resources and the harm to the public. Thus, matters posing an imminent threat to publicsafety or directly harming large numbers of consumers must take precedence over other matters,including pirate radio.1
Moreover, pirate radio presents persistent enforcement issues. Although some pirateoperators cease operations after receiving an initial warning letter, they are often quicklyreplaced by other pirates. Many other pirate operators may ignore the warning or resumebroadcasting from another location. Even monetary penalties and equipment seizures do notdeter the most aggressive pirate operators, who simply refuse to pay the FCC forfeitures andobtain cheap replacement equipment online.
Given these facts, it is clear that the pirate radio problem cannot be solved byenforcement alone. Therefore, I have created an inter-bureau task force to work with outsidestakeholders, including the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), to develop policy andenforcement options to address the issue. Indeed, on June 29, 2015, this group held a Pirate
While it is theoretically possible that pirate radio interference could prevent listeners from hearing the EmergencyAlert System (EAS) signal from licensed broadcasters, we are unaware of any complaints alleging such interference.
Page 2-The Honorable Sean Patrick Maloney
Radio Roundtable with NAB and other broadcaster representatives. Some of the ideas discussedincluded:
• Revision of the Communications Act to provide for "aiding and abetting" liability forlandlords and other parties that provide material support to pirate operators;
• Identification of trade associations and law enforcement entities to educate landlords,advertisers and others about the unlawful nature of pirate operations and develop bestpractices;
• Release of a policy statement/enforcement advisory that could be shared with thesegroups and help channel state, local, and federal resources on pirates; and
• Additional FCC, state, and local enforcement options for reducing pirate activities.
The roundtable was a good first step but much more needs to be done. I appreciate yourinterest in this matter and look forward to working with you and other stakeholders on innovativesolutions to the pirate radio problem. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
