+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke...

The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke...

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: marianna-merry
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
34
The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Transcript
Page 1: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on

Maternal-Child Health

Geeta K. Swamy, MD

Duke University Department of ObGyn

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Page 2: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Statistics

• 1996 – 2002, number of births after ART increased by 120% in the US

• In 2009, > 60,000 ART infants born in the US, accounting for 1% of all births

• ART conceptions account for 2 – 3% of all births in several European countries

Page 3: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

The Goals and Risks of ART• Goals of ART are to

• Optimize pregnancy rates• Produce healthy, genetically normal full-term

deliveries• Minimize the risk of multiple gestations

• The critical questions . . .• Are we doing harm when treating infertility

patients with ART?• Do the ART treatments per se cause adverse

outcomes?

Page 4: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

ICSI IVF

AssistedHatching

PGD

Ovarian Stimulation

Gamete Handling & Evaluation

Oocyte Collection Sperm Collection

Insemination

Zygote Identification

Micro-Manipulations

Embryo Growth

The Process of ART

Page 5: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Oocyte

Sperm Zygote Embryos Transfer

CBAVDOligospermia GENETICS Environment

Environment

AgeGENETICS

Ovarian Stimulation

Culture ConditionsMedia

Gas PhaseSystemDuration

Manipulations

Assisted HatchingBlastomere Bx

IVF

ICSI

Number & Qualityof Embryos

Possible Etiology of Adverse Outcomes

Page 6: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Parental risk factors for Adverse Outcomes

010203040506070

20-34 35-39 40-45

Aneuploidy

Implantation

Munne et al ’01,’04,‘06

Maternal Age (y)

Female

%

0

5

10

15

20

“0” 0-5 5-10 10-20 >20

Aneuploidy

Yoshida et al ’95

Sperm Concentration (x106/ml)

Male

%

Page 7: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Endometrial ReceptivityPlacentationMaternal HealthUterine EnvironmentGestational Order

Moore and Persaud. The developing human, clinically oriented embryology. 1998

Possible Etiology of Adverse Outcomes

Page 8: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Penetration into the ooplasm

Compression of the oocyte during initial penetration into the ooplasm

Stabilization prior to injection

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection(ICSI)

Page 9: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Grading of Embryos

• Based on cell number ~ rate of growth• Amount of fragmentation• Equal size of cells ~ efficiency of division• Does not correlate with health/ability of child

Zygote Day 3 Embryo Day 5 Embryo (Fertilized Egg) (Blastocyst)

Early Embryonic Development

Page 10: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Culture-Induced Effects: Day of Embryo Transfer

• Transfer after Day 5• Increased incidence of monozygotic twins (Behr et al ’00; Menezo et al ’02)

• Increased incidence of male neonates? (Menezo et al ’99; Kausche et al ‘01)

Egg

Ret

rieva

l

Days Post-Fertilization 1 2 3 4 50

Day of Embryo Transfer

Page 11: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Possible AdversePregnancy Outcomes

• Multi-fetal gestations• Spontaneous Abortion• Ectopic Pregnancy• Prematurity• Small-for-gestational-age• Preeclampsia• Placental abnormalities• Congenital anomalies• Genetic abnormalities

Page 12: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Multi-fetal Gestation – Fetal/Infant

SARTCORS Data Reporting System, 2007

• Spontaneous abortion• Perinatal mortality• Preterm birth/low birthweight• Fetal growth restriction• Placental abnormalities• Cord accidents – prolapse, vasa previa, entanglement• Hydramnios• Congenital malformations• Cerebral Palsy

Singletons 67.2%

Twins 28.4%

Triplets++ 4.4%

Page 13: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Multi-fetal gestation- Maternal• Hyperemesis gravidarum• Anemia• Gestational diabetes• Placenta previa• Placental abruption• Pregnancy related hypertension/preeclampsia• Cesarean delivery• Postpartum hemorrhage• Excess weight gain

Page 14: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Effectiveness of ART

• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

• Review of safety and effectiveness of interventions for ovulation induction, superovulation, & ART

• 5294 abstracts with review of 1210 full-text articles

• 478 articles included in final report

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 15: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Effectiveness of ART• Limitations

• Final number of randomized trials was small • Majority of randomized trials provided data only

on pregnancy rates, not live births or pregnancy outcomes

• Few studies were adequately powered to detect differences in pregnancy rates, live births, multiple gestations, or severe complications

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 16: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Effectiveness of ART

• Spontaneous abortion – equal incidence compared to spontaneous conception

• Ectopic pregnancy• more common after ART but related to maternal factors• removal of hydrosalpinges reduces ectopic risk

• Maternal serum screening• false positive results more likely in 2nd trimester • skewed maternal age distribution• adjustment for thresholds for invasive testing?• predictive of adverse pregnancy outcomes?

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 17: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Preterm Birth - Singletons

• 11 studies• IVF/ICSI 70 to 150% increase in delivery < 37 wks• 4 systematic reviews consistently found an increased

risk of preterm birth among singletons following IVF

ReferenceOdds Ratio

95% CI

McGovern et al, Fertil Steril. 2004 1.98 1.89 – 2.08

Jackson et al, Obstet Gynecol 2004 1.95 1.73 – 2.20

Helmerhorst et al, BMJ. 2004 2.04 1.80 – 2.37

MacDonald et al, J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005 1.93 1.36 – 2.20

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 18: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Preterm Birth - Singletons

• ~ 2-fold increased risk after ART• inadequate data to differentiate between

indicated vs. spontaneous preterm birth• Etiology unclear

• Implantation• Progesterone• Subclinical infection

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 19: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Preterm Birth - Twins

• Increased risk preterm birth but relative increase is substantially lower than that for singletons

• Helmerhorst et al, BMJ 2004• OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02–1.13] for delivery < 37 weeks• OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.78–1.15] for delivery < 32 weeks

• Etiology• Higher proportion of spontaneous twins born prematurely• ART twinning may confer “healthier” embryos healthier

pregnancy

• Small increase in relative risk substantially impacts absolute number or attributable risk

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 20: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

SGA - Singletons

• 3 systematic reviews all found significantly increased risks of small-for-gestational-age (SGA)

• Etiology• Implantation/placentation• ART treatments• Maternal/embryonic factors

ReferenceOdds Ratio

95% CI

MacDonald et al, J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005 1.59 1.20, 2.11

Jackson et al, Obstet Gynecol 2004 1.60 1.25, 2.04

Helmerhorst et al, BMJ 2004 1.40 1.15, 1.71

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 21: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Preeclampsia

• 9 studies• Consistently increased risk after ART as shown in

several studies• Meta-analysis by Jackson et al, Obstet Gynecol 2004

• OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.95• Adjustment for confounders, e.g. maternal age, parity

• Etiology• Maternal risk factors, e.g. obesity, PCOS/insulin

resistance/metabolic syndrome• Implantation

AHRQ Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 167, May 2008Myers, McCrory, Mills, Price, Swamy, Tantibhedhyangkul, Wu, Matchar

Page 22: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Perinatal outcomes - singletons after IVF

• Meta-analysis of 15 studies of 12,283 IVF and 1.9 million spontaneously conceived singletons

Outcome # Studies OR (95% CI)

Spontaneous preterm birth 5 2.1 (1.7, 2.7)

Gestational diabetes 4 2.0 (1.4, 3.0)

Preeclampsia 8 1.6 (1.2, 2.0)

Placenta previa 6 2.9 (1.5, 5.4)

Vaginal bleeding 7 2.5 (1.9, 3.3)

Perinatal mortality 8 2.2 (1.6, 3.0)

Jackson RA, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103:551-63.

Page 23: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Perinatal outcomes - singletons after IVF

• Labor & Delivery Outcomes

Outcome # Studies OR (95% CI)

Labor induction 7 1.2 (1.0, 1.3)

Cesarean – elective 7 1.9 (1.5, 2.5)

Cesarean – emergent 7 1.5 (1.1, 2.0)

NICU admission 5 1.6 (1.3, 2.0)

Neonatal death 7 2.0 (1.2, 3.4)

Jackson RA, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103:551-63.

Page 24: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Perinatal outcomes - singletons

• Compared with non-assisted singleton pregnancies, ART singleton pregnancies have significantly worse outcomes for:

• Antenatal

• Perinatal

• Neonatal

• Most odds ratios are >2

• All but one of these ART-related adverse outcomes for singletons are not evident for twins

Page 25: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Congenital anomalies after ART

• 30-40% increased risk of major malformations among infants born after ART

• In studies with sufficient size and data to allow controlling for potential confounders, risks decrease

• Hansen et al. meta-analysis pooled OR estimates

Group Odds Ratio 95% CI

Singletons 1.31 1.17, 1.46

IVF-only 1.94 1.50, 2.50

ICSI-only 1.28 1.14, 1.43

Hansen M, et al. Human Reproduction 2005; 20(2): 328-38)

Page 26: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Genetic Risk: ICSI vs. Control

• 1586 ICSI fetuses karyotyped via invasive prenatal testing with 3% abnormal

Van Steirteghem et al ’02 Hum Reprod Update;8:111-6

* Significantly different from expected population levels

Abnormality N % 95% CI Population levels, %

Non-inherited 25 1.6* 1.02, 2.32 0.45, 0.87

Sex chromosome 10 0.6* 0.30, 1.16 0.19, 0.27

Autosomal 15 0.9 0.52, 1.56 0.26, 0.60

Inherited 22 1.4* 0.87, 2.09 0.47, 0.22

TOTAL 47 3.0 2.19, 3.92 0.92

Page 27: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Angelman’s Syndrome (ch 15)• Rare subtype estimated at 1/300,000• 3 isolated cases reported among ICSI births• 1 case had a fertile father• All had epigenetic defect with loss of

methylation of maternal allele

Imprinting Defects after ART

Page 28: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Beckwith-Weidemann’s Syndrome (ch 11)• Baseline risk of 1/15,000• 3 registry studies found incidences of 3/65,

6/143 and 6/149• RR estimate increase ~ 4 to 6-fold• All cases due to imprinting defect

Imprinting Defects after ART

• Clinical evidence is suggestive but not sufficient to conclude that ART techniques may increase frequencies

Page 29: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

Neuro-Developmental Outcomes

• Increased risk of cerebral palsy after ART is related to the increased risk of preterm birth

• Stromberg et al, Lancet 2002• Cerebral palsy (overall OR 3.7, 2.8 in singletons)• Developmental delay (OR 4.0)

• Hvidtjorn et al, Pediatrics 2006• Prematurity and multi-fetal gestation are individually

independent risk factors for CP• After adjustment for both, prematurity remains as a

strong independent risk factor

Page 30: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Insufficient to define ART success as establishment of pregnancy or achieving a live birth

• Emphasis should be on healthy term infants

• Counseling should be non-directive, provided well in advance of any invasive procedures, in a relaxed and unrushed environment

Reddy, et al, Obstet Gynecol, 109 (4), Apr 2007

Page 31: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Couples should be informed of treatment risks and pregnancy rates as well as risks of adverse pregnancy/birth outcomes for which well-documented outcome data exist • Multi-fetal gestation & number of embryos transferred• Preterm birth, SGA, preeclampsia• Congenital anomalies• Genetic abnormalities (parental risk factors, prenatal

diagnosis)

Reddy, et al, Obstet Gynecol, 109 (4), Apr 2007

Page 32: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Meta-analyses reveal worse perinatal outcomes for ART singletons

• Conversely, IVF twins seem to be no higher risk than spontaneous twins

• The etiology for these adverse outcomes in singletons is unknown but may be related to• Infertility per se• Ovarian stimulation: hormone milieu? placentation? • Lab technology

Summary

Page 33: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Slightly higher risk of major malformations in ART babies (3.5% vs. 2.5%), some related to maternal age, infertility and parental disease

• Psycho-motor development is normal, neuro-developmental outcome influenced by neonatal problems

• Increased incidence of very rare disorders remains possible (etiology unknown, but may be lab-related)

• Patients should be counseled about potential risks, their possible etiologies and our current knowledge base

Summary

Page 34: The Impact of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Maternal-Child Health Geeta K. Swamy, MD Duke University Department of ObGyn Division of Maternal-Fetal.

• Etiologies of many of the adverse outcomes

• Need to identify infertility in the general population (appropriate comparison groups)

• Teasing out infertility versus treatment-related issues (e.g. ART for tubal ligation versus disease-related)

• Linkage of lab technologies with gestational complications, birth, infant and child health outcomes: • Culture media• ICSI, AH, PGD• Prolonged embryo culture• Frozen versus fresh transfers

Future research directions. . .


Recommended