+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going...

The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going...

Date post: 23-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Consortium for Verification Technology The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going forward Frank von Hippel, Senior Research Physicist and Professor of Public and International Affairs emeritus Program on Science and Global Security, Princeton University Consortium on Verification Technology Annual Meeting University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 29 November 2017
Transcript
Page 1: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

TheIranNuclearDeal:Whereweareandouroptionsgoingforward

FrankvonHippel,SeniorResearchPhysicistandProfessorofPublicandInternationalAffairsemeritus

ProgramonScienceandGlobalSecurity,PrincetonUniversityConsortiumonVerificationTechnologyAnnualMeeting

UniversityofMichigan,AnnArbor29November2017

Page 2: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Outline

• TheDeal

• ChangingU.S.policy

• Strengtheningthenonproliferationregime

2

Page 3: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Redlines

• IranwouldnotgiveupeitheritsenrichmentprogramoritsArakreactor.

• PresidentObama:Iranwouldhavetobeatleastayearawayfrommakingenoughhighlyenricheduraniumorseparatingenoughplutoniumtomakeabomb.

3

Page 4: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Arakreactordesign:40à20MWt,naturalU–>LEUfuel,8à1kgPu/yr productionspentfueltobeshippedtoRussia

4

Page 5: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Number of installed centrifuges: Iran escalates, pauses, the Deal*

 

   

 

Nov. 2003

Nov.2004

Nov. 2005

Nov.2006

Nov. 2007

Nov.2008

Nov. 2009

Nov.2010

Nov. 2011

Nov.2012

Nov. 2013

Nov.2014

JCPOA

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0

Centrifuges

Installed IR-1Operational IR-1Installed IR-2M

10 YEARS

Installed

Operating

IR-2Ms(~ 5 SWUs/yr)

10,000

20,000

2010 2015

Ahmadinejad Rouhani

G.W. Bush Obama

ArmsC

ontrolTo

day

*Bas

ed o

n IA

EA re

ports

Stuxnetcomputer virus

Restraint

2005

5

Trump

Page 6: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Iran’sstocksofLEU

 

 

Nov.2012

Nov. 2013

Nov.2014

June 2015

8,000 kg

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

a n t t p w s s

N T s d n

 

 

15 YEARS

UF6 gas

All forms ~ 1/5 of LEU feed to produce one bomb quantity of HEU.

Enough LEU feed to produce ~5 bomb quantities of 90% enriched uranium.

8,000 kg

300 kg

6

Page 7: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

VerificationIAEAhasissued9reports onIran’scompliancewiththeDealatitsdeclarednuclearsitesduring2016-17andhasreportednosignificantviolations.

Focusofthecritics,includingUSAmbassadortotheUN,NikkiHaley,hasbeenonthefactthattheIAEAhasnotbeeninspectingmilitarysitesinIrantoverify thatIranisnot:• Doingcomputermodelingofnucleardevices,• Workingonmulti-pointdetonationofexplosivesanddiagnostic

equipmentforsuchexplosions,or• Workingonexplosively-drivenneutrongenerators.IAEApositionisthatsuchinvestigationsrequirenewandcredibleindicationsofbannednuclearactivities.USdoesnotclaimtohavesuchevidence.

7

Page 8: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

ComplaintsabouttheDeal

• Durationlimited.Between2025-40,IranrevertstonormalstatusplusAdditionalProtocol,themaximumtransparencyrequiredofanormalcountry.

• Iran’sballisticmissileprogram.Sanctions butnolimitsagreed.• Iran’sactivitiesintheregion:Hamas(Gasa strip),Hezbollah

(Lebanon),Houthis(Yemen)…• Israel,SaudiArabiaandperhapsU.S.wouldpreferregimechange

inTeheran(weforgetthatthecurrentregimewasestablishedinreactiontoourregimechangein1953)

8

Page 9: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

IInn UU..SS..,, IIrraann DDeeaall iiss aann eexxeeccuuttiivvee aaggrreeeemmeenntt (not a treaty) with Iran, China, European Union, France, Germany, Russia and the UK

Accordingto,theIranAgreementReviewActof2015,ifthePresidentdoesnotcertifyevery90daysthatthesuspensionofU.S.nuclearsanctionsis“appropriateandproportional…tothemeasurestakenbyIran”and“vitaltothenationalsecurityinterestsoftheUnitedStates”CongresscantaketheU.S.outoftheDealbyamajorityvotewithin60days.Afterthat,actionbytheSenatewillbesubjecttothefilibusterrule(60%majorityrequired).

9

Page 10: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

PresidentTrump’spositionOn13October2017,hedeclaredthatthesuspensionofU.S.nuclear-relatedsanctionswasnot“appropriatedandproportionate”tothemeasurestakenbyIran:

“IamdirectingmyadministrationtoworkcloselywithCongressandouralliestoaddressthedeal’smanyseriousflawssothattheIranianregimecanneverthreatentheworldwithnuclearweapons.Theseincludethedeal’ssunsetclausesthat,injustafewyears,willeliminatekeyrestrictionsonIran’snuclearprogram…

“intheeventwearenotabletoreachasolutionworkingwithCongressandourallies,thentheagreementwillbeterminated.Itisundercontinuousreview,andourparticipationcanbecancelledbyme,asPresident,atanytime.”

10

Page 11: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

TheresponseofU.S.partnersintheDeal

"TheIraniannationhasnotandwillneverbowtoanyforeignpressure,”-- PresidentofIran

“Preservingthe[Irannucleardeal]isinoursharednationalsecurityinterest.”-- PresidentofFrance,ChancellorofGermany,PMofUK,

reopeningnegotiations“isanonstarterandtryingtogetitisadeadend.”-- France’sAmbassador

“noregionalissuethatwehavewithIranthatwouldnotbeevenmoredifficulttohandleifIranpossessednuclearweapons.”–EUAmb.

“Wealreadyhaveonepotentialnuclearcrisis.Wedefinitelydonotneedtogointoasecondone.”– EUForeignMinister

“Ifit’snotbroke,don’tfixit."– RussianDeputyForeignMinister“thisdealisimportanttoensuringtheinternationalnuclearnonproliferationregimeandregionalpeaceandstability”– ChinaFM

11

Page 12: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

NotjustanIranproblem• Anynationalenrichmentorreprocessing(plutonium-separation)programisapotentialnuclear-weaponproliferationproblem.

• Wetrustsomecountries(Germany,Netherlands,Japan)butnotmostothers.[JapanhasenoughseparatedPufor1000nuclearweapons.]

• WehavehadconfrontationsoverArgentina,Brazil,India,Japan,Pakistan,SouthAfrica,SouthKoreanenrichmentand/orreprocessingprogramsin1970s.N.Koreastartingin1990s.Iran,S.Koreatoday.

• FortheU.S.,the“goldstandard”foranon-weaponstateisforittohavenoenrichmentandnoreprocessingcapacity.Sofar,onlytheUnitedArabEmirateshavecommitted–conditionally– tothisstandard.

• Agenericsolutionisneeded.

12

Page 13: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Reprocessingnoteconomic.Whynotbanit?

13

Reprocessing in countries with power

reactors

U.S. has opposed spread of reprocessing since 1974, when India used Atoms-for- Peace reprocessing to obtain plutonium for weapons.

Fortunately, Iran is not interested in reprocessing.

Page 14: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Multinationalize enrichment?

14

URENCO (Germany, Netherlands, UK)Large nationalSmall national (not enough for 1 GWe)

220

<1

<1

<1

<13560

150

Civilian Enrichment

Capacity measured in

1 GWe LWR units

Page 15: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

Verificationbenefitsofmulti-nationalization

Urenco hasfocusedonlyonassuringbestpracticesareshared.

Initialthoughtsonhowtobuildinmoremulti-nationaltransparency• Control-room/maintenancepersonnelofmixednationalities.• Personnelinvolvedincentrifugemanufactureandinstallationfrom

othercountrieswithcentrifuge-designexpertise.• Sensitivitiesaboutindustrialintelligenceonoperationsshouldbe

balancedwithneed(asinIran)forinternationalconfidencethatnoundeclaredmaterialisbeingenriched.

• RegionalverificationorganizationssuchasEuratom andABACCalsohaveconfidence-buildingbenefits.

15

Page 16: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Where we are and our options going ...cvt.engin.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/173/... · In U.S., Iran Deal is an executive agreement (not a treaty) with

Consortium for Verification Technology

LinkageofnonproliferationtodisarmamentIncreasingly,however,keynon-weaponstatesaredemandingthattheweapon-statesmovefurtheronnucleardisarmament(CTBT,FMCT,de-alerting,nofirstuse,deepercuts...)beforetheywillundertakefurthernonproliferationcommitments

• Argentina,Brazil unwillingtosignuptoAdditionalProtocol(AP).• Egypt unwillingtoratifyCWC,BWCuntilIsraeldoes• Iran unwillingtoacceptpermanentrestrictionsbeyondAP• SouthAfricaunwillingtoeliminateitslegacystockofHEUfromits

dismantlednuclearweapons.• TreatyonProhibitionofNuclearWeaponsvotedforinJulyby122

non-weaponstates.Weneedpoliticalaswellastechnicaladvances.

16


Recommended