Date post: | 21-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | winifred-cummings |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Role of the Statistician in the Evolving Preclinical Drug Safety
Environment
Steven Bailey Pfizer, Drug Safety R&D Statistics
Pfizer Internal Use
Preclinical Drug Safety testing • integral part of drug development for decades• Historically more emphasis on running studies
needed for regulatory approval
Recently scope of work in Drug Safety has been evolving
• Goal of identifying issues earlier
Introduction
2Pfizer Internal Use
Drug Safety getting involved in new areas
Interesting new areas of support
Openness to statistical support
To date, our response have been underwhelming- resource limitations
‘Conclusions’
3Pfizer Internal Use
Regulatory studies required for IND, NDA submissions
Toxicology
Reproductive Toxicology
Carcinogenicity
Genetic Toxicology
Safety Pharmacology
Juvenile Animal Toxicity
Generally standard study design
Standardized statistical methods
Challenges: generally basic from a statistical point of view
haven’t changed much over time
The past
4Pfizer Internal Use
In 2004 – ‘New Topics’
Session at the Midwest Biopharm Statistics Workshop
Title: Statistical Analysis of New Studies Required in Preclinical Safety Testing
Talks:• New methodologies for QT interval prolongation adjustments
in preclinical safety pharmacology studies• Design and analysis of CNS/FOB studies in preclinical safety
pharmacology testing• Design and analysis of juvenile animal toxicity studies in
support of pediatric drug products• Statistical aspects of auditory startle experiments in
behavioral toxicity studies
Pfizer Internal Use 5
Currently: 5/5000 compounds progress to clinical trials
1/5000 compounds become approved drugs
Average time for development to approval is 12 years
- MedicineNet.com
Avg. cost for R&D for each drug approved is $4 billion
- Forbes, 2012
Failure rate increasing, and development cost increasing over time
More conservative, safety conscious FDA
In preclinical Drug Safety, more types of testing required
Evolving Development Landscape
6Pfizer Internal Use
New development paradigms
Fail early
- Identify problems early so compounds killed early
Personalized medicine
Biopharmaceuticals
Creates new types of development activities,
and new opportunities for statistical support
Evolving Development Landscape
7Pfizer Internal Use
Quantitative Pathology- Imaging- Stereology- Comparison of Methods
Efficacy Model Development
Safety Biomarker Development and QualificationmiRNA biomarkers
New Areas of Support
8Pfizer Internal Use
(Automated) imaging data is increasingly used to assess pathology
– Less subjective
– Once processes is set up (staining, equipment learning), is less expensive.
– Process is time consuming, but equipment can be set and left to operate automatically
Quantitative Pathology - Imaging
9Pfizer Internal Use
Objective: Quantify nephrin expression by QIHC on sections of kidney
• Dosed animals vs. controls
• IHC for nephrin on sections of kidney using Ventana Discovery XT automated immuno-staining platform
• Nanozoomer slide scanner used to capture images
• PE Vectra image analysis software used to measure area in the region of interest (glomerular tuft) that is occupied by chromogen (IHC%)
Example: Quantitative Immunohistochemistry for Nephrin
10Pfizer Internal Use
QIHC: Nephrin Expression
%Glomerular Tuft Expressing Nephrin
Vehicle 22.5 mpk/cycle 50.0 mpk/cycle0
20
40
60
80
Nep
hri
n+ar
ea /
glo
m t
uft
are
a (%
)
Vehicle
1525F 400xA B
C D
1525F
50.0 mpk/cycle
4525F 400x
50.0 mpk/cycle
4027M 400x
4525F
4027M
Ben Wei, Yutian Zhan and Shawn O’Neil
Region of
interest (ROI)
Example Data
Quantitative Pathology - Imaging
12Pfizer Internal Use
sampleNephrin
IHC (µm²)Area of All Tufts (µm²)
Nephrin IHC Area %
1525 142482 306656 46.46
4027 135534 493650 27.46
4525 117349 306323 38.31
Pfizer Confidential │ 13
CD25 / FoxP3
Image Analysis Quantification of CD25+/FoxP3+
CD25 / FoxP3
Pseudocoloring via Nuance Multispectral Camera
CD25+/FoxP3+
FoxP3+
CD25+/FoxP3+
CD25+
Imaging technologies can be used to measure:
– Area
– Cell counts• Cell area • Cell nuclei
– Cells exhibiting specific markers
Quantitative Pathology - Imaging
14Pfizer Internal Use
Stereology – the study of 3 dimensional structures using two-dimensional cross sections
- volume- surface area- length- number
Techniques require a few 'representative' plane sections, then statistically extrapolate to three-dimensional object
Quantitative Pathology - Stereology
15Pfizer Internal Use
Very old field – can be traced back to the Buffon’s needle problem, posed by Geoges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon in 1777
Suppose we have a floor made of parallel strips of wood, each the same width, and we drop a needle onto the floor. What is
the probability that the needle will lie across a line between two strips?
Quantitative Pathology - Stereology
16Pfizer Internal Use
Image Created By: Wolfram MathWorld
In the past – heavily reliant on assumptionsModel basedAssumptions regarding structure (shape and
homogeneity) of the 3-dimensional object
‘New’ stereology – “Design-Based Stereology”- assumption and model-free- unbiased - also called ‘Assumption free stereology’
Quantitative Pathology - Stereology
17Pfizer Internal Use
Example – Count of neurons in ganglia
Estimated Total Count = # counted x 1/SSF x 1/TSF x 1/ASF= 178 x 1/0.05 x 1/0.739 x 1/0.025= 178 x 1082= 192,596
SSF = 24/480 (0.05)1 21 41 61 81 101 121
Sections 1-20(360 µm)
18 µm thickness
8 µm Dissector height (fixed)(1 µm guard zones)
TSF = 8/10.8251 (0.739)
Avg thickness = 10.8251 µm
ASF = 0.025 (2.5%)
6 5
6 7
Total # neurons counted: 178
Nerves - Neurons within ganglia count, volume
Kidney - measurement of glomeruli in kidney volume, number - measurement of mesangial matrix within glomeruli volume, percent of tissue
Lungs - Alveoli volume, surface area
Stereology - Uses
19Pfizer Internal Use
Sampling plan - Define reference space - Design a ‘systematic-random’ sampling plan
- removes subjective choices and options- independent of properties of the tissue- efficient, unbiased- Multiple layers of sampling - Variation in each layer- Sampling plan dependent on precision needed
Model assumptions – introduce bias - modeling of the geometry of the structures - popular in materials science-simple geometry
Replication of results impossible due to sampling plans
Stereology - Issues
20Pfizer Internal Use
Appropriate definition of reference space Appropriate sampling strategies
Quantification of variability - method variability - biological variability
Appropriate endpoint - not always correct - stereology example: percentage mesangial matrix/glomeruli vs. total area mesangial matrix
Imaging and Stereology – Statistical Issues
21Pfizer Internal Use
Sample size/power calculations
Reproducibility - method (staining, sampling, observer effect, etc.)
Appropriate statistical methodology nested models repeated measures parametric or nonparametric approaches unequal variance
Imaging and Stereology – Statistical Issues
22Pfizer Internal Use
- Factor of imaging, stereology, and histopathology is cost
- Example (imaging): Comparison of Cri Vectra vs. Stereologer in measuring glomerular area
- Example (imaging vs. histopathology): histopathological scoring for severity of spinal cord demyelination and quantitative image analysis for myelin content
Quantitative Pathology – Comparison of Methods
23Pfizer Internal Use
Pfizer Confidential │ 24
0 20 40 60 80 1000
1
2
3
4
5
Cervical Spinal Cord
LFB/PAS QIHC - Cervical
His
top
ath
olo
gy:
dem
yle
inati
on
sco
re
p<0.05
0 20 40 60 80 1000
1
2
3
4
5
Thoracic Spinal Cord
LFB/PAS QIHC - Thoracic
p<0.0001
0 20 40 60 80 1000
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lumbar Spinal Cord
LFB/PAS QIHC - Lumbar
p<0.0001
Quantitative Pathology – Comparison of Methodsl
*Statistical analysis: Linear regression .
There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between histopathological scoring for severity of spinal cord demyelination and quantitative image analysis for myelin content based on Luxol
Fast Blue histochemical staining at all levels of spinal cord evaluated (p<0.05).
Now:- Regression / p-value / R2
- Correlation
Better:- Bland Altman
- Lin L, Hedayat A, Wu W, (2012), Statistical Tools for Measuring Agreement, Springer
- Hshieh and Ng, Assessing agreement: a graphical approach, poster presentation at 2015 JSM
- Simulations – do the two methods arrive at the same conclusion?
Quantitative Pathology – Comparison of Methods
25Pfizer Internal Use
Example: Mouse Collagen Induced Arthritis Model• Collagen Induced Arthritis (CIA) model used to test
efficacy of new therapeutics– Arthritis induced using monoclonal antibodies – Used to simulate rheumatoid arthritis – Compound administered, joints examined
pathologically for inflammation– Compound screening completed in a short time
• Through the use of historical data characterization and simulations, were able to determine that only lost 2% in power (98% power to 96%) despite reducing the
number of pathology slides read by 50%.
Efficacy Model Development
26Pfizer Internal Use
• Develop Safety Biomarkers so we can:
- Screen compounds faster at less cost- Less compound needed- Fewer animals- Faster
- Possibly go into clinical trials by closely monitoring compounds that have side effects
Safety Biomarker Development
27Pfizer Internal Use
‘Standard’ Development Paradigm
– Study with 2 groups – control and treated Treated @ dose expected to cause 100% response
– Treated group is dosed with an article that is known to cause effect (eg, kidney damage)
– Perform simple statistics (eg, t-test) on every parameter of potential interest
Safety Biomarker Development
28Pfizer Internal Use
Issues
– Correlation does not imply causality
– Need biomarkers specific to injury under study, but may find biomarkers indicative of non-specific injury
– No ability to develop biomarkers that depend on combinations of parameters
– How to choose among set of candidates with significant p-values
– How to handle transient effects
Safety Biomarker Development
29Pfizer Internal Use
Statistical Issues
– Should be comparing affected vs. non-affected animals, not dosage groups
– Design: prefer additional dosage groups where only a percentage of animals respond
– Sample size / lack of reproducibility
Safety Biomarker Development
30Pfizer Internal Use
Statistical tools
- Predictive modeling
- Classification and Regression Trees (CART)
- Random Forest
- Logistic Regression/Linear Discriminant Analysis
- Allow models using multiple parameters
- Allow ranking of models
Reference: Johnson, Kjell and Kuhn, Max, (2013), Applied Predictive Modeling, Springer.
Safety Biomarker Development
31Pfizer Internal Use
microRNAs (miRNAs)
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding, single-stranded, short
( 22-nucleotide) regulatory RNAs ∼
Estimated 1000 miRNA genes in human; ~1% of human ∼genome
Wide range of expression: Few to 100,000 copies per cell miRNA are highly conserved and often tissue specific
Landgraf et al., Cell, 2007
miRNA research trends
The growing awareness of the
importance of miRNAs has generated intense
activity in the biomedical research
community.
Vergoulis T et al. 20111
miRNAs in human body fluids (blood, urine, saliva, feces) are non-invasive markers for disease. miRNA expression patterns are tissue specific miRNA expression can easily be detected miRNAs are conserved across multiple species miRNAs may be used to localize the site of injury miRNAs may reliably track progression of injury/recovery
NormalizationNeeded to account for sample preparation
and other technical artifacts
Missing Values
High percentage of missing values. Missing values can be due to:
1.Technical issues - missing at random2.Value greater than machine sensitivity3.Value unreliable (greater than a threshold,
eg 32, that the scientist sets) – not missing at random
MultiplicityDepends on experiment. Cards we use have
384 wells. For screening, we generally collect data on 384 or 768 miRNAs.
Issues with analysis of miRNAs
Normalization
1.Quantile normalization2.LOESS normalization3.MiR-Adaptive normalization (Zhao and Zhu, Poster at
Joint Statistical Meetings, 2015)
Missing Values
1.Many miRNAs have no analysis due to prevalence of missing values (eg, in a recent investigation, only 110 of 384 miRNAs had at least 3 observations per group.
2.Technical issues are missing at random; can be ignored3.Values greater than machine sensitivity or with
unreliable values are not missing at random. Currently are being ignored and only captured in biological interpretation through scan of missing values pattern.
MultiplicityWhat are appropriate adjustment procedures. Use of False Discovery Rate adjustment prevalent.
Statistical Techniques
Willingness to do ‘Business Development’
Interest in learning subject area(s)- Can be extremely time-consuming
Ability to think ‘outside the box’- Not just about statistics
STRONG consulting skills- ability to work with scientists without overwhelming them
Resources – i.e., time
To Get Involved - What’s Needed
36Pfizer Internal Use
Investigative PathologyShawn O’Neil Yutian Zhan
PathologyScott SchellingTim LabrancheBruce Homer
Safety BiomarkersShashi RamaiahRounak Nassirpour
StatisticsDavid Potter
Acknowlegements
37Pfizer Internal Use