1
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
ORDER
R-2017-006, In re Suggested Amendments to Supreme Court Rules (Electronic Filing)
Advisory Committee on Rules Chair, Justice Robert Lynn, recently
received a suggestion to adopt the “Supplemental Rules of the Supreme
Court of New Hampshire For Electronically Filed Cases and Other Cases
Commenced on or after January 1, 2018” and to amend existing
Supreme Court Rules 1, 6, 12-D, 16, 17, 21, 22 and 26 to accommodate
electronic filing. Justice Lynn referred the suggestion directly to the
Court pursuant to New Hampshire Supreme Court Rule 51(f)(“Special
Cases”).
On or before October 23, 2017, members of the bench, bar,
legislature, executive branch or public may file with the clerk of the
supreme court comments on the suggested amendments. An original
and one copy of all comments shall be filed. Comments may also be
emailed to the court at:
To see the language of proposed new rules please see Appendix A
(attached). To see the language of the proposed amendments to existing
Supreme Court Rules, please see Appendices B through I (attached).
The current rules of the New Hampshire state courts are
2
available on the Internet at:
http://www.courts.state.nh.us/rules/index.htm
Date: September 21, 2017
ATTEST: _________________________________
Eileen Fox, Clerk Supreme Court of New Hampshire
3
APPENDIX A
The suggestion is to adopt the Supplemental Rules of the Supreme
Court of New Hampshire for Electronically Filed Cases and Other Cases
Commenced on or after January 1, 2018, as follows:
Supplemental Rules of the Supreme Court of New
Hampshire for Electronically Filed Cases and Other Cases
Commenced on or after January 1, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. General Provisions
1. Effective Date and Applicability of These Rules
2. Relationship to Other Rules
3. Definitions
4. Scope of Electronic Filing: General Provisions
5. Scope of Electronic Filing: Exceptions Based Upon
Party’s Status
6. Scope of Electronic Filing: Exceptions Based Upon Case
Type or Document Type
7. Official Court Record and Public Inspection
8. Registration Requirements
4
II. Filing Documents
9. Timing and Timeliness of Filings: General Provisions
10. Timing and Timeliness of Filings: Effect of Technical
Failure
11. Format of Filings
12. Paper Copies Not Required or Allowed
13. Signatures on Filings
14. Signatures on Court-Issued Electronic Documents
15. Notarized Signatures on Electronic Documents (Notarial
Acts)
16. Confidential Filings
III. Service of Documents
17. Formal Service of Process
18. Electronic Service of Documents
IV. Miscellaneous Provisions
19. Electronic Payment of Fees, and Refund of Fees Paid
Electronically
20. Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice
21. Certified or Attested Court Documents
5
Rule 1. Effective Date and Applicability of These Rules
These rules, which shall be known as the “Supplemental Rules of
the Supreme Court of New Hampshire for Electronically Filed Cases and
Other Cases Commenced on or after January 1, 2018,” govern the filing
of documents in supreme court cases commenced on or after January 1,
2018. These rules also govern the filing of documents in any supreme
court case commenced prior to January 1, 2018, that the supreme court
converts to an electronic case in accordance with Rule 4(c) of these rules.
In the interest of expediting a decision, or for other good cause shown,
the supreme court or a single justice thereof may suspend the
requirements or provisions of any of these rules in any instance on
application of a party or on the court’s or a single justice’s motion, and
may order proceedings in accordance with that direction.
These rules shall be cited as “Sup. Ct. 2018 Supp. R. ____.”
6
Rule 2. Relationship to Other Rules
To the extent that these supplemental rules conflict with the
existing Rules of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire (“Supreme
Court Rules”) as to such matters as the filing, format, or service of a
document, these rules supersede the Supreme Court Rules. In all
other respects, however, the Supreme Court Rules remain in full force
and effect, and these rules shall supplement them.
7
Rule 3. Definitions
(a) “Confidential” means a case record or portion of a case
record, such as a particular document, that shall be available to all
case parties and their attorneys, but shall not be available for public
inspection pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 12(1)(b).
(b) “Conventionally,” with respect to the filing of a document,
means the filing of the document with the court in paper or other non-
electronic format. With respect to serving a party with a copy of a filed
or court-issued document, “conventionally” means providing a copy of
the filed or court-issued document to that party personally or by first-
class mail in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 26.
(c) “Document” means any written matter issued by or filed with
the court, whether filed conventionally or electronically, including, but
not limited to, notices of appeal, petitions, appendices, motions,
objections, applications, notices, affidavits, briefs, memoranda of law,
orders, and opinions.
(d) “Ex parte” document means a document submitted to the
court for filing with the intention that the document shall be neither
served on nor available to one or more other case parties, including
their attorneys or nonlawyer representatives.
(e) “Registered e-filer” means a person, including a self-
represented party, a nonlawyer representative, or an attorney, who has
registered with the electronic filing system in order to submit
documents for filing with the court.
(f) “Electronic filing” means the process whereby a registered e-
filer electronically submits a document to the supreme court in
accordance with these rules to initiate a supreme court case or to file a
document in an existing supreme court case.
(g) “Electronic service address” of a party means the electronic
mail (e-mail) address at or through which the party shall receive
8
electronic service. Electronic service on a party represented by an
attorney shall be made on the attorney through the attorney’s
electronic service address. Electronic service on a party represented by
a nonlawyer representative shall be made on the nonlawyer
representative through the nonlawyer representative’s electronic
service address.
(h) “Electronic service,” with respect to an electronic filing by a
party, means the electronic filing system’s transmission of a
notification of that filing to the electronic service address of each party
who has consented to electronic service by registering as an e-filer.
The electronic filing system’s electronic notification will transmit a
party’s electronic filing to all registered e-filers in the case and contain
a hyperlink or other means for the registered e-filers to access the
document or documents that were filed electronically. “Electronic
service,” with respect to a document issued by the court, means the
court’s electronic transmission of a notification of the court-issued
document to the electronic service address of each party who has
consented to electronic service by registering as an e-filer. The
electronic notification will contain a hyperlink or other means for the
registered e-filers to access the court-issued document.
(i) “Electronic signature” is a signature, other than an inked
signature, as authorized by these rules.
(j) “Non-electronic signature” is an inked signature.
(k) “Supreme Court case” or “case,” in the context of a supreme
court proceeding governed by these rules, includes all of the following:
an appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7; an appeal pursuant to
Supreme Court Rule 7-B; an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme
Court Rule 8; an interlocutory transfer pursuant to Supreme Court
Rule 9; an appeal from an administrative agency pursuant to Supreme
Court Rule 10; a petition for original jurisdiction pursuant to Supreme
9
Court Rule 11; a certified question of law pursuant to Supreme Court
Rule 34; a request for an advisory opinion of the justices pursuant to
Part II, Article 74, of the New Hampshire Constitution; an attorney
discipline matter pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37; a judicial
discipline matter pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 40; a matter
involving administration or supervision of the New Hampshire Bar; and
a matter involving a proposed rule or rule amendment pursuant to
Supreme Court Rule 51.
10
Rule 4. Scope of Electronic Filing: General Provisions
(a) Except as otherwise provided by these rules or by order of the
supreme court, documents in cases commenced in the supreme court on
or after January 1, 2018, shall be submitted to the court for filing as
follows:
1. By Attorneys. Attorneys must submit all filings to the supreme
court through the court’s electronic filing system. This requirement
applies both to New Hampshire Bar members and to attorneys admitted
pro hac vice.
2. By Self-Represented Parties Who Filed Electronically in Trial
Court. Self-represented parties who were required to file electronically in
the trial court proceeding from which the appeal is taken must submit all
filings to the supreme court through the court’s electronic filing system.
A party who is self-represented in the supreme court, but who filed
electronically in the trial court proceeding below through an attorney or a
nonlawyer representative, must submit all filings to the supreme court
through the court’s electronic filing system.
3. By Self-Represented Parties Who Did Not File Electronically in
Trial Court. Self-represented parties who were not required to file
electronically in a trial court proceeding below have the option of: (1)
registering as an e-filer with the electronic filing system and submitting
documents to the supreme court electronically through the system; or (2)
filing documents conventionally. However, if a self-represented party
registers as an e-filer and electronically submits a document in a
supreme court case through the electronic filing system, the self-
represented party must electronically submit all subsequent filings in
that case through the electronic filing system.
4. By Nonlawyer Representatives. Nonlawyer representatives
must submit all filings to the supreme court through the court’s
electronic filing system to the same extent as self-represented parties. A
party who is represented in the supreme court by a nonlawyer
11
representative, but who filed electronically in the trial court proceeding
below through an attorney or as a self-represented party, must submit
all filings to the supreme court through the court’s electronic filing
system.
(b) When applicable pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the
requirement to submit documents through the electronic filing system
extends to nonconfidential documents in nonconfidential cases,
confidential documents in nonconfidential cases, and documents in
confidential cases, with the exception of the document types listed in
Rule 6 of these rules.
(c) Cases commenced in the supreme court prior to January 1,
2018, are not subject to these supplemental rules and are not available
for electronic filing, absent a specific court order to the contrary. Filings
in such cases must be submitted conventionally to the court in
accordance with the Supreme Court Rules. However, a party may file a
written motion with the court to request to convert such a non-electronic
case to an electronic-filing case. If the court grants the motion, or
decides on its own motion to convert the case to an electronic-filing case,
the case will thereafter be governed by these rules. Following such an
order for conversion of the non-electronic case to an electronic-filing
case, the parties must ensure that filings submitted after the conversion
date comply with all provisions of these rules.
(d) Unless the court has specifically ordered otherwise in advance,
faxing documents to the court or e-mailing documents to the court
outside of the electronic filing system does not constitute “filing” in any
supreme court case, regardless of the case’s date of commencement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in a Supreme Court Rule 7-B appeal, the
minor may file documents in accordance with any of the filing methods
permitted by Rule 7-B.
12
Rule 5. Scope of Electronic Filing: Exceptions Based Upon Party’s
Status
A party who is otherwise required to file electronically in a supreme
court case may be excused from the requirement of electronic filing in
the following circumstances:
(a) The supreme court may fully excuse a party from electronic
filing in a case if the court finds that: (1) a party is protected by law from
disclosing certain identifying or contact information, and electronic filing
would defeat or undermine that protection; or (2) extraordinary
circumstances exist that would render electronic filing such a hardship
that the party would be denied access to the court. A party requesting to
be fully excused from the requirement of electronic filing shall
conventionally file a motion with the court setting forth the reasons for
the request. The motion should be filed with the party’s first filing in the
case, and the party’s first filing may be conventionally filed subject to the
court’s ruling on the motion. If the motion is granted, the party who is
fully excused from the requirement of electronic filing shall file
documents conventionally, shall serve documents conventionally on
other parties, and shall be served documents conventionally by other
parties.
(b) Self-represented individuals over whom guardianship is
sought or ordered, and self-represented individuals for whom involuntary
admission or commitment is sought or ordered, are exempt from the
requirement of electronic filing and need not file a motion to be excused.
(c) A self-represented incarcerated party who notifies the court
in writing of his or her incarceration is exempt from the requirement of
electronic filing until such time as that party is no longer incarcerated. A
self-represented incarcerated party need not file a motion to be excused.
(d) In the interest of expediting a decision, or for other good
cause shown, the supreme court may permit, on its own motion or the
motion of a party, a limited exception to the requirement of electronic
13
filing by allowing a party who is not otherwise excused pursuant to this
rule to initiate a case conventionally or to file a document in an existing
case conventionally.
14
Rule 6. Scope of Electronic Filing: Exceptions Based Upon Case
Type or Document Type
(a) A supreme court case concerning a proposed rule or rule
amendment pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 51 shall be opened by
the supreme court, and not initiated by an interested person through
the electronic filing system. However, all filings subsequent to the
court’s case initiation shall be governed by these rules.
(b) Any material for filing in a case that cannot reasonably be
submitted through the electronic filing system as a .doc, .docx. or .pdf
document, such as physical exhibits, demonstrative evidence, and
video or audio recordings, must be conventionally filed.
(c) A document that is submitted for in camera review shall not
be submitted through the electronic filing system. The document must
be conventionally filed.
(d) An ex parte document shall not be submitted through the
electronic filing system. The document must be conventionally filed,
and the title of the document must state that the document is filed ex
parte.
(e) A document submitted in a confidential case by a person who
is not a party or counsel in the case shall not be submitted through the
electronic filing system. The document must be conventionally
submitted, following which a determination will be made as to whether
to docket the document and to allow the person to file in the case.
(f) A Financial Affidavit & Application for Court Appointed
Counsel or a Financial Affidavit & Application for Transcripts at State
Expense shall not be submitted through the electronic filing system.
The document must be conventionally filed.
(g) A motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 21B to withdraw a
criminal appeal shall not be submitted through the electronic filing
system. The document must be conventionally filed.
15
(h) An Attorney’s Statement of counsel fees and expenses under
Supreme Court Rules 47 or 48, or a Guardian ad Litem’s Statement of
fees and expenses under Supreme Court Rule 48-A, shall not be
submitted through the electronic filing system. The document must be
conventionally filed.
(i) The certified copy of the record in a municipal land-use
appeal or in an appeal from an administrative agency may be
conventionally filed.
(j) A trial court’s record or a portion thereof that is ordered to be
transmitted pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 14(2) may be
conventionally filed.
(k) A Supreme Court Rule 9 interlocutory transfer statement
may be conventionally filed by the trial court or administrative agency.
(l) A certified question pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 34 may
be conventionally filed by the Supreme Court of the United States, by a
court of appeals of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, or
by a United States district court.
(m) A mediator’s Appellate Mediation Report may be
conventionally filed.
16
Rule 7. Official Court Record and Public Inspection
For a supreme court case governed by these rules, the official
court record of docket entries and documents, whether filed
electronically or conventionally, shall be the electronic case file
maintained by the clerk of court. Accordingly, the clerk in such a case
will scan or otherwise reproduce a conventionally filed document into
an electronic document for entry in the court’s electronic case file,
unless the nature of the conventionally filed document (such as a
physical exhibit) makes it technologically infeasible to do so. The clerk
need not maintain or retain any conventionally filed document after the
clerk scans or otherwise reproduces that document into an electronic
document for entry in the court’s electronic case file. If the nature of a
conventionally filed document makes it technologically infeasible to
scan or otherwise reproduce the document into an electronic document
for entry in the court’s electronic case file, the document as
conventionally filed shall be part of the court’s official record and shall
be maintained in its conventionally filed format.
In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 12(1)(a), the public will
be able to inspect nonconfidential cases governed by these rules and
nonconfidential documents in such cases through electronic viewing
access at the clerk’s office during regular business hours, except that a
nonconfidential document that is maintained in its conventionally filed
format shall be made available for inspection in its conventionally filed
format. Following issuance of the mandate or the close of the supreme
court case, however, any documents that were conventionally filed by
the trial court or administrative agency, including records transmitted
pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 10(3) and 14(2), may be returned by
the clerk to the trial court or administrative agency.
17
Rule 8. Registration Requirements
(a) Registration. To initiate a supreme court case or to file a
document through the court’s electronic filing system, a person must
first become a registered e-filer by completing an online registration
and accepting the conditions of electronic filing, including those set
forth in the “Responsibilities of Registered E-Filer” section of this rule.
(b) Responsibilities of Registered E-Filer.
(1) A registered e-filer is responsible for all documents that are
filed via the registered e-filer’s username and password. A registered
e-filer shall not knowingly cause or permit the registered e-filer’s log-
in information to be used by any other person; provided, however,
that an attorney may permit the attorney’s log-in information to be
used by attorneys and nonlawyer assistants over whom the attorney
exercises supervisory responsibilities in compliance with the New
Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct.
(2) Any electronic filing, or downloading or viewing of an
electronic filing, made by use of a username and password shall be
deemed to have been made with the authorization of the person
registered to use the log-in information.
(3) If a person’s log-in information is misappropriated,
misused or compromised in any way, the person registered to use that
log-in information must promptly notify the clerk.
(4) For good cause shown, the court may issue an order
prohibiting a registered e-filer from filing electronically in a particular
case or in all cases.
(5) A registered e-filer must maintain an electronic service
address during the pendency of the case at which the registered e-
filer consents to receive and agrees to accept through the electronic
filing system copies of electronically filed documents, as well as
notices and orders issued electronically by the court. Whenever
18
notice or service to a registered e-filer is required, notice or service to
the electronic service address of record in the electronic filing system
shall satisfy the requirement and shall be deemed binding on the
registered e-filer and on any party that the registered e-filer
represents in the case.
(6) A registered e-filer must maintain accurate contact
information in the court’s electronic filing system. This obligation is
separate from, and in addition to, a party’s obligation under Supreme
Court Rule 26(9) and a New Hampshire Bar member’s obligation
under Supreme Court Rule 42E to provide accurate and up-to-date
contact information.
(7) If a registered e-filer is no longer a participant in any pending
supreme court case and does not wish to remain active in the
electronic filing system, the registered e-filer should deactivate his or
her registration status in the system.
19
Rule 9. Timing and Timeliness of Filings: General Provisions
(a) Availability of Electronic Filing System
Electronic submission of a document may be made any day of
the week, including weekends and holidays, and at any time of day
that the electronic filing system is available. The expansive availability
of the electronic filing system shall not affect the provisions for
computation and extension of time set forth by statute or by Supreme
Court Rule 27.
(b) Timing of Electronic Filings
When a document is submitted through the electronic filing
system, the electronic filing system shall issue a confirmation notice to
the filer that the submission has been received. Following receipt of
the submission, the clerk shall review the submitted document to
determine whether the document should be docketed. If the clerk
dockets the document, the electronic filing system shall issue a notice
to the filer that the submission has been so docketed, and the
document shall be deemed to have been filed on the date that the
electronic submission was received, unless that date is a Saturday,
Sunday, legal holiday, or other day that the clerk’s office is closed, in
which case the document shall be deemed to have been filed on the
next day that the clerk’s office is open for business. If the clerk rejects
the submitted document for docketing purposes, the electronic filing
system shall issue a notice to the filer that the submission has been so
rejected, and the document shall be deemed not to have been filed.
(c) Timing of Conventional Filings
A document that is filed conventionally in a case subject to these
rules shall be governed by Supreme Court Rule 26(1) with respect to
the timing of the filing.
20
(d) Timeliness of Filings
A document that is electronically submitted through the court’s
electronic filing system and docketed by the clerk shall be deemed
timely if it is filed at or before 11:59:59 p.m. on the date that the filing
is due. A document that is filed conventionally in a case subject to
these rules shall be deemed timely if it is filed, as measured by
Supreme Court Rule 26(1), on or before the date that the filing is due.
21
Rule 10. Timing and Timeliness of Filings: Effect of Technical
Failure
(a) Under these rules, a “technical failure” is deemed to have
occurred when the electronic filing system cannot receive filings
continuously or intermittently over the course of any period of time
greater than one hour after 12:30 p.m. on a given day, excepting such
periods resulting from scheduled system maintenance for which public
notice was provided. A filer shall immediately report a technical failure
by calling the clerk’s office at (603) 271-2646.
(b) A filer who encounters a technical failure may conventionally
file the document, provided that the document is accompanied by a
motion for relief from technical failure that attests to the filer’s
unsuccessful attempts to timely submit the document through the
electronic filing system.
(c) If a filer misses a filing due date as a result of a technical
failure, the filer may electronically or conventionally file the document
on the first day on which the clerk’s office is open for business
following the missed due date. The document shall be accompanied by
a motion for relief from technical failure that attests to the filer’s
unsuccessful attempts to timely submit the document through the
electronic filing system. If the motion is granted, a document so filed
shall be deemed to have been submitted and received on the day that
the technical failure prevented the filer’s submission.
(d) A technical problem with the filer’s computer or systems,
including but not limited to a telephone line problem, a problem with
the filer’s internet service, or a problem with the filer’s hardware or
software, does not constitute a “technical failure” under these rules
and will not excuse an untimely filing, unless the court orders
otherwise. In such a circumstance, the filer may file the document
conventionally, along with a motion explaining how the filer’s technical
22
problem prevented an electronic submission of the document through
the electronic filing system.
23
Rule 11. Format of Filings
(a) Naming of Filings and Documents. So far as possible, a
party initiating a case electronically should identify the correct case
category, case type, and case subtype from the available selections in
the electronic filing system, and a party filing a document electronically
should identify the correct filing type and filing subtype from the
available selections in the electronic filing system. Upon review, the
clerk may, when necessary and appropriate, modify a filer’s selections
to comply with the court’s standards for case classification and
document classification, but the clerk shall not reject any submission
merely because the filer’s selections do not comply with the court’s
classification standards.
(b) Formatting and Page Limits. An electronically filed document
must comply with the formatting and word-limit requirements for
conventionally filed documents as set forth in the Supreme Court
Rules, except that colored-cover, binding, and related requirements
shall not apply to electronically filed documents.
(c) Acceptable Formats for Electronically Filed Documents. A
document that is submitted through the electronic filing system must
be in one of the following formats only: .doc; .docx; or .pdf. The
electronic filing system is not capable of accepting documents or other
material in any other format. A document that is submitted in .doc or
.docx format will be converted to .pdf text searchable format by the
electronic filing system. So far as possible, the filer shall submit a
document that has been converted or is convertible to .pdf text
searchable format, unless the filer possesses only a paper copy of the
document, in which case a scanned .pdf that is not text searchable
may be submitted. A scanned document shall conform with a
standard of no less than 200 and no more than 300 dots per inch. A
filer shall not electronically submit a document that contains tracking
24
tags, embedded systems commands, password protections, access
restrictions or other security features, special tags or dynamic features.
(d) Size Limits on Documents for Electronic Submission. No
individual document exceeding 25 megabytes, either in converted or
scanned .pdf format, shall be submitted through the electronic filing
system. Any document exceeding 25 megabytes must be divided into
separate documents of less than 25 megabytes.
(e) Filer’s Requirement to Retain Scanned Document. With the
exception of paper documents that were filed in the trial court or
administrative agency from which the appeal is taken, any paper
document that is converted by the filer to .pdf format through a
scanner and then filed using the electronic filing system must be
retained by the filer until the issuance of the mandate or the close of
the case. Upon request of the court or any party, the filer must make
the paper document available for inspection.
(f) Hyperlinks. Hyperlinks and other electronic navigational aids
may be included – and are encouraged – in an electronically filed
document as an aid to the court. Each hyperlink must contain a text
reference to the target of the link. Although hyperlinks may be
included in a document as an aid to the court, the material referred to
by a hyperlink is not considered part of the official record unless it is
already part of the record in the case or unless it is material of which
the court may take judicial notice. Hyperlinks may be used by a filer
to provide an electronic link to other portions of the same document or
to other portions of the court’s case file. Hyperlinks to cited authority
may not replace standard citation format for constitutional citations,
statutes, cases, rules or other similarly cited materials.
(g) Manner of Submitting Conventional Filings. Because a
document that is conventionally filed in a supreme court case
commenced on or after January 1, 2018, will be scanned or otherwise
25
reproduced by the clerk into an electronic document for entry in the
court’s electronic case file, the filer of the document must ensure that
the document is printed only on the front side of each page, is logically
organized and separate from other documents, and is submitted to the
court with no tabs, durable bindings, or difficult-to-remove fasteners
that would interfere with the clerk’s ability to scan or otherwise
reproduce the document. If a timely filed document does not conform
to this rule or is not clearly legible, the clerk may require the filer to
resubmit the document, but the document shall not thereby be deemed
untimely.
26
Rule 12. Paper Copies Not Required or Allowed
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the Supreme
Court Rules, a filer who submits a document electronically or
conventionally in a case governed by these rules need not and shall not
file any paper copies of the document with the court, unless otherwise
ordered to do so.
27
Rule 13. Signatures on Filings
(a) Original Electronic Document Deemed Signed.
The electronic submission of a document by a registered e-filer
shall be considered a signed original if:
(1) The document is electronically signed by the registered e-
filer in either one of the following ways:
(A) the typed symbol /s/ followed by the typed name of the
registered e-filer submitting the document (example: /s/
John Smith); or
(B) a graphic representation of the filer’s actual signature;
and
(2) Unless the document is a court form, the document
including the electronic signature also includes the following
information:
(A) name (in addition to name typed as part of electronic
signature in section (1));
(B) address;
(C) telephone number (if available);
(D) e-mail address;
(E) law firm (for attorneys only); and
(F) bar identification number (for attorneys only).
(b) When Multiple Signatures on Electronic Document Are Required.
(1) When multiple signatures are required on a document that is
submitted electronically, each person named as a signer of the
document shall either:
(A) sign in one of the ways a filer signs documents
described in (a)(1) above; or
(B) authorize the filer to sign the document on his or her
behalf. The filer shall represent having obtained approval
28
to sign for another signer named in the document as
follows:
Typed symbol /s/ followed by the typed name of the
other signer, followed by, “Signed by [filer’s name] with permission of [other signer’s name.]”
Example: /s/ Jennifer Jones, signed by John Smith
with permission of Jennifer Jones.
(2) The electronic signature of each named signer shall be
accompanied by the same information required to accompany the
filer’s electronic signature described above in (a)(2). However, when a
document is signed with permission of another named signer, the
filer’s information shall accompany only the filer’s own signature.
(3) Notwithstanding the above, the court, in its discretion, may
require a graphic representation of any filer’s actual signature.
(c) Effect of Electronic Signature.
An electronic signature meeting the requirements described
above in (a)(1) and (2) shall be considered the functional equivalent to a
non-electronic signature produced on paper.
(d) Challenge to Authenticity of Signature on Electronic Document.
Any party to a case may challenge the authenticity of the
signature on an electronically filed document by filing an objection
within 10 days after discovery that the signature is not authentic,
provided that the objection is filed prior to issuance of the mandate or
the close of the supreme court case. After issuance of the mandate or
the close of the supreme court case, a party seeking to challenge the
authenticity of the signature on an electronically filed document may
pursue appropriate relief through any otherwise available procedures.
29
(e) Signature on Conventional Filings.
A document that is conventionally filed must contain the original
non-electronic signature of each party submitting the document, along
with the information described above in (a)(2).
30
Rule 14. Signatures on Court-Issued Electronic Documents
(a) Justice’s Signature. If an electronic document requires a justice’s
signature, the document shall be deemed signed if it bears one of the
following:
(1) the typed symbol /s/ followed by the typed name of the
justice (example: /s/ John Smith); or
(2) a graphic representation of the justice’s signature.
(b) Clerk’s Signature. If an electronic document requires the clerk’s
signature, the document shall be deemed signed if it bears one of the
following:
(1) the typed symbol /s/ followed by the typed name of the
clerk (example /s/ John Smith); or
(2) a graphic representation of the clerk’s signature.
Official Comment
This rule does not itself create any requirement that orders,
opinions or other documents contain a signature of the clerk or a
justice.
31
Rule 15. Notarized Signatures on Electronic Documents (Notarial
Acts)
(a) A notarial act associated with an electronically filed
document must conform to the requirements of notarial acts and
signatures provided in RSA chapter 456-B and RSA chapter 294-E.
(b) The signature of a person who executed an electronically filed
document and the signature of a person who performed a notarial act
related to such a document must be presented by:
(1) The typed symbol /s/ followed by the typed name of the
signer(s) (example: /s/ John Smith); or
(2) The graphic representation of each signer’s actual
signature.
(c) Any party to a case may challenge the authenticity of the
signature of a person who performed a notarial act on a document filed
electronically in that case by filing an objection within 10 days after
discovery that the signature is not authentic, provided that the
objection is filed prior to issuance of the mandate or the close of the
supreme court case. After issuance of the mandate or the close of the
supreme court case, a party seeking to challenge the authenticity of
the signature of a person who performed a notarial act on a document
filed electronically may pursue appropriate relief through any otherwise
available procedures.
Official Comment
For requirements of notarial acts and signatures on electronic
documents, see, especially, RSA 456-B:7 and RSA 294-E:2, VIII, RSA
294-E:9, and RSA 294-E:11.
32
Rule 16. Confidential Filings
The electronic filing of a case or document does not affect the
confidential status to which the case or document may otherwise be
entitled under applicable law, including Supreme Court Rule 12.
(a) Filing a Document that is Partially Confidential in a
Nonconfidential Case. This provision applies in a nonconfidential case
to the filing of a document a portion of which contains material that
has been determined to be confidential by the trial court,
administrative agency, other tribunal, or the supreme court. A party
who files a document that is partially confidential must: (1) notify the
court, at the time of filing and in a conspicuous manner, that the
document contains confidential material, and identify the specific basis
for confidentiality; (2) file the document with the confidential material;
and (3) file a redacted version of the document, from which the
confidential material has been removed. To comply with this
requirement when a party is filing the document electronically, the
party must: (1) notify the court of the document’s status as confidential
by designating the document as confidential in the electronic filing
system and by indicating in the electronic filing system the basis for
the document’s confidentiality, because doing so will prevent the
document from being available for public inspection; and (2) file the
redacted version of the document without designating it as confidential
in the electronic filing system, so that the redacted version is available
for public inspection.
(b) Filing a Confidential Document in a Nonconfidential Case.
This provision applies in a nonconfidential case to the filing of a
document that has been determined to be confidential in its entirety by
the trial court, administrative agency, other tribunal, or the supreme
court. A party who files a document that is confidential in its entirety
must notify the court, at the time of filing and in a conspicuous
33
manner, that the document is confidential, along with the specific
basis for confidentiality. If the party is filing that document
electronically, the party must notify the court of the document’s status
as confidential by designating the document as confidential in the
electronic filing system and indicating in the electronic filing system
the basis for the document’s confidentiality, because doing so will
prevent the document from being available for public inspection.
(c) Filings in a Confidential Case. This provision applies to a
case that has been determined to be confidential in its entirety by the
trial court, administrative agency, other tribunal, or the supreme court.
A party who initiates a confidential case must indicate in a
conspicuous manner on the notice of appeal form or in the appeal
document or other case-initiating document that the entire case is
confidential, along with the specific basis for confidentiality. If the case
is initiated electronically, the filer shall not designate the case-initiating
filing or document as confidential in the electronic filing system
because doing so will defeat the ability of parties to view the case-
initiating filing or document through the case-view functionality of the
electronic filing system. Similarly, a party who electronically files a
subsequent document in a confidential case shall not designate the
filing or the document as confidential in the electronic filing system
because doing so will defeat the ability of parties to view that particular
filing or document through the case-view functionality of the electronic
filing system. If a filing or document is electronically designated by a
party as confidential in contravention of this provision, the clerk may
remove the designation, but the clerk’s removal of the designation shall
not thereby alter the confidential status of the case, filing or document.
(d) Confidential Filings When There Has Been No Prior
Determination of Confidentiality. As set forth in Supreme Court Rule
12(2)(b), a party or other person with standing who seeks to have the
34
case record or a portion of the case record, such as a particular
document, determined to be confidential by the supreme court must
file a motion to seal. In addition to the procedure set forth in Rule
12(2)(b), if the party who seeks a determination of confidentiality is
electronically filing the case or document for which the confidentiality
determination is sought, the party must: (1) file the motion to seal
electronically, but not designate the motion itself as confidential in the
electronic filing system; (2) designate the filing or document for which
confidentiality is sought as confidential in the electronic filing system;
and (3) indicate in the electronic filing system the basis for
confidentiality. The party’s designation of a filing or document as
confidential in the electronic filing system neither establishes
confidentiality nor takes the place of a motion to seal as required by
Supreme Court Rule 12(2)(b). Upon filing of the motion to seal, the
case record or the portion of the case record which is the subject of the
motion shall be kept confidential pending a ruling on the motion. If
the motion to seal is denied, the clerk shall remove the confidential
designation of the filing or document in the electronic filing system.
(e) Court Action When Confidentiality is Required. The failure of
a party filing electronically to comply with the provisions of this rule, or
the failure of a party or other person with standing to request that a
case record or a portion of a case record be confidential, shall not
preclude the court from determining on its own motion that a statute,
administrative or court rule, or other compelling interest requires that
a case record or a portion of a case record be kept confidential.
However, the responsibility for properly designating and identifying
confidential material in accordance with this rule rests solely with the
parties and their attorneys. It is not the responsibility of the court or
the clerk to review each document to ensure that confidential material
has been properly designated and identified as confidential.
35
(f) Documents Submitted Ex Parte or for In Camera Review. The
procedures set forth in this Rule 16 do not apply to documents
submitted ex parte or to documents submitted for in camera review.
As set forth in Rule 6 of these rules, such documents must be
conventionally filed.
36
Rule 17. Formal Service of Process
A document that requires personal service or other formal service
of process on a party to confer jurisdiction over that party as a matter
of law shall not be served electronically, unless the court authorizes
electronic service in the case. If electronic service is not authorized,
the document must be served in the manner required by applicable
law.
37
Rule 18. Electronic Service of Documents
(a) Effect of Electronic Service. Electronic service, as defined in
these rules, satisfies the requirement in Supreme Court Rule 26(2) that
a filer provide to all other parties a copy of each filing at or before the
time of filing. In addition, whenever notice to a party is required,
notice to the electronic service address of the party shall be deemed
notice to, and binding on, the party.
(b) Acceptance of Electronic Service by Registered E-Filers;
Conventional Service Required to Other Parties.
(1) Registration as an e-filer in the electronic filing system
shall constitute consent to acceptance of electronic service of
court documents and documents filed by other registered e-filers
in the case. Except as otherwise provided by these rules or by
court order, no other form of delivery to a registered e-filer by a
registered e-filer is permitted as valid service. When a registered
e-filer submits a document to the court through the electronic
filing system, and one or more other parties to the case or their
representatives have registered as e-filers, the filing party must
cause electronic service through the filing system to be made on
each other registered e-filer by so designating at the time of the
filing party’s submission. If an e-filer uses the electronic filing
system’s “Exclude from eService” functionality to circumvent this
requirement, the clerk may reject the filing.
(2) A party who is not required to file electronically, whether
by exemption or otherwise, shall be conventionally served by
providing him or her, at the time of filing, with a paper copy of
each document filed. See Supreme Court Rule 26(2) and (3)(a).
A party who is not required to file electronically, whether by
exemption or otherwise, shall conventionally serve each of his or
her filings by providing, at the time of filing, a paper copy of each
38
filing to the other parties in the case. See Supreme Court Rule
26(2) and (3)(a). It is the responsibility of the party filing a
document to provide a copy of the filing to other parties in
accordance with this provision and (b)(1), above. With respect to
a court-issued document, the clerk’s office will conventionally
serve the document on each party who is not required to file
electronically, whether by exemption or otherwise.
(3) A party who is presumptively required by these rules to
file electronically, but who has not yet registered as an e-filer,
must be conventionally served in accordance with (b)(2), above;
provided, however, that in a case when all parties are
represented by lawyers and a stipulation for e-mail service was
filed in the trial court or administrative agency in compliance
with applicable rules of that tribunal, see, e.g., Superior Court
Rule 3(b); District Division Rule 1.3-A(B), the “appeal document”
(as defined by Supreme Court Rule 3) shall be served in
accordance with the stipulation, and such service shall be
deemed valid conventional service. A party who is presumptively
required by these rules to file electronically, but who has not yet
registered as an e-filer and who has requested an exemption
from the requirement of electronic filing, must conventionally
serve each of his or her filings to other parties in the case in
accordance with (b)(2), above. It is the responsibility of the party
filing a document to provide a copy of the filing to other parties
in accordance with this provision and (b)(1), above. With respect
to a court-issued document, the clerk’s office will conventionally
serve the document on each party who has not yet registered as
an e-filer.
(c) Certificate of Service. A party filing a document, whether
electronically or conventionally, must include a statement in the
39
document in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 26(7) certifying that
a copy of the document is being timely provided to all other parties in
the case. Unless the document is a court form, the certification in the
document must identify the name of each party receiving a copy of the
document through the electronic filing system’s electronic service and
the name of each party receiving a paper copy of the document through
conventional service.
(d) Court-Issued Documents. The clerk’s office will electronically
serve any court-issued document to all registered e-filers in the case.
Electronic service by the clerk’s office constitutes service or notice of
the document. In accordance with (b)(2) and (b)(3), above, the clerk’s
office will conventionally serve a court-issued document to each party
who is not a registered e-filer.
(e) No-Contact Orders. Absent a court order to the contrary, a
party who is subject to a no-contact order and who is a registered e-
filer may use the electronic filing system’s electronic service to provide
a copy of a filed document to the opposing party if the opposing party
or the opposing party’s counsel or nonlawyer representative is a
registered e-filer.
40
Rule 19. Electronic Payment of Fees, and Refund of Fees Paid
Electronically
A registered e-filer shall make payment of any fees that are due
to the court through the electronic filing system’s payment processor,
unless the registered e-filer has either filed a motion to waive the fee or
indicated in the electronic filing system that the fee will be paid at the
court. If the amount listed as due for a filing or transaction in the
electronic filing system is insufficient to cover the actual amount of the
applicable fee or surcharge imposed by RSA 490:26-a, II, the clerk may
order the filer to pay the remaining amount.
The clerk may refund an electronic or other payment when no
payment was required, when the payment was duplicative of a previous
payment, or when the amount paid exceeds the actual amount owed
for the filing or transaction.
41
Rule 20. Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice
A motion for the appearance pro hac vice of an attorney who is
not a member of the Bar of this State (“Nonmember Attorney”) must be
electronically filed by a registered e-filer who is an active member in
good standing of the Bar of this State (“In-State Attorney”) and who will
be associated with the Nonmember Attorney in accordance with
Supreme Court Rule 33(1). The nonrefundable application fee must be
paid through the electronic filing system’s payment processor, unless
the registered e-filer has either filed a motion to waive the fee or
indicated in the electronic filing system that the fee will be paid at the
court or was previously paid in a consolidated or related matter. See
Supreme Court Rule 33(5). Due to technical features of the electronic
filing system, the In-State Attorney must file a separate motion for each
Nonmember Attorney whose admission pro hac vice is sought, and may
not request the admission of multiple Nonmember Attorneys in one
motion.
42
Rule 21. Certified or Attested Court Documents
When a statute, court rule or administrative order requires a
document to be certified or attested to by means of a supreme court
seal or otherwise, such a document shall be considered properly
attested to or certified when:
(a) the document, with statutory attestation language and
bearing an electronic certification stamp approved by the supreme
court as meeting the requirements for attestation, is electronically
transmitted directly from the clerk to the registered e-filer or any
other person or entity; or
(b) the paper document is issued by the clerk bearing the
physical seal of the court or other evidence of attestation.
43
APPENDIX B
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 1 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]):
RULE 1 OFFICIAL PUBLICATION AND NOTIFICATION OF RULES
The Supreme Court of New Hampshire, pursuant to its
constitutional, statutory, and common law powers, N.H. CONST. pt. II,
art. 73-a; RSA 490:4; Boody v. Watson, 64 N.H. 162 (1886), promulgates the following rules of practice and procedure.
[For cases commenced in the supreme court on or after
January 1, 2018, the following rules are supplemented by – and, as
to certain matters such as the filing, format or service of a document, may be superseded by – the Supplemental Rules of the
Supreme Court of New Hampshire for Electronically Filed Cases and Other Cases Commenced on or after January 1, 2018. Those supplemental rules alter these rules in several ways, including, but
not limited to, as follows: (1) notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in these rules, a filer who submits a document
electronically or conventionally in a case governed by the supplemental rules need not and shall not file any paper copies of the document with the court, unless otherwise ordered to do so; (2)
a document that is filed electronically in a case governed by the supplemental rules must comply with the formatting and word-limit requirements set forth in these rules, but not with the colored-
cover, binding, and related requirements of these rules; and (3) a document that is filed conventionally (non-electronically) in a case
governed by the supplemental rules must comply with the formatting and word-limit requirements set forth in these rules, but the filer of the document must ensure that the document is printed
only on the front side of each page, is logically organized and separate from other documents, and is submitted to the court with no tabs, durable bindings, or difficult-to-remove fasteners that
would interfere with the clerk’s ability to scan or otherwise reproduce the document into an electronic document for entry in
the court’s electronic case file.]
Publication in New Hampshire Bar News will constitute official
publication and notification of any changes in rules regulating practice in the New Hampshire courts or governing membership in the New
Hampshire Bar Association or standing as a member of the New Hampshire Bar, as well as of any other Supreme Court orders of general application.
44
Rules of the supreme court and all other New Hampshire courts
shall be available in the offices of all clerks of court and shall also be printed by a commercial publisher and made available for purchase by
attorneys, law libraries and the public. Further information as to obtaining copies of the New Hampshire Bar News or binders of Court Rules may be obtained from the New Hampshire Bar Association or the
Supreme Court’s Clerk’s office.
In the interest of expediting a decision, or for other good cause
shown, the supreme court or a single justice thereof may suspend the requirements or provisions of any of these rules in any instance on
application of a party or on the court's or a single justice’s motion, and may order proceedings in accordance with that direction.
References in court rules to the district court shall be deemed to include the circuit court – district division; references to the probate
court shall be deemed to include the circuit court – probate division; and references to the judicial branch family division shall be deemed to include the circuit court – family division.
45
APPENDIX C
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 6 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 6 FORM OF CASES AND APPENDICES
(1) Filings of cases and appendices [shall be made through the court’s electronic filing system, unless either the case is exempt or
the party filing the case is exempt or otherwise not required to file electronically in accordance with the Supplemental Rules of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire for Electronically Filed Cases and
Other Cases Commenced on or after January 1, 2018.
(2) If either the case is exempt or the party filing the case is exempt or otherwise not required to file electronically, the filing of the case and any appendix may be submitted to the court
conventionally (non-electronically) in accordance with Rule 26 and] may be prepared using a printing, duplicating or copying process capable of producing a clear letter quality black image on white paper, but shall
not include ordinary carbon copies. [Unless submitted through the court’s electronic filing system, each filing of a case shall be upon
good quality, nonclinging paper 8 ½ by 11 inches in size.] If timely filings do not conform to this rule or are not clearly legible, the clerk of the court may require that new copies be substituted, but the filings
shall not thereby be deemed untimely.
(2) Each filing of a case in a mandatory appeal shall be upon good
quality, nonclinging paper 8 ½ by 11 inches in size, but the mandatory notice of appeal need not be in pamphlet form, need not have covers, and
need not be bound along the left margin.
Each filing of a case and appendix in any case other than a
mandatory appeal shall be in pamphlet form upon good quality, nonclinging paper 8 ½ by 11 inches in size, with front and back covers of
durable quality. Each shall have a minimum margin of one inch on all sides the binding side and shall be firmly bound along the left margin. Any metal or plastic spines, fasteners, or staples shall be flush with the
covers and shall be covered by tape. The covers shall be flush with the pages of the case. The court will not accept any other method of binding unless prior approval has been obtained from the clerk of the supreme
court.
46
(3) The front cover of the filing of a case and of the appendix, if the appendix is separately produced, shall contain: (1) The name of this
court; (2) The docket number, after one has been assigned; (3) The title of the case; (4) The nature of the proceeding in this court, e.g., appeal by
petition; and (5) The names and addresses of counsel for the party filing the case. See form in appendix to these rules.
(4) Whenever the pertinent text of constitutions, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, insurance policies, contracts or other
documents is to be set forth in an appendix, it need not be typewritten, but may be produced by an easily readable duplicating or dry copying process.
(5) Each request for findings of fact and rulings of law set forth in a
notice of appeal or appendix shall indicate on the margin whether they have been “granted,” “denied” or “not ruled upon” by the master or the court.
47
APPENDIX D
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 12-D as follows
(new material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 12-D SUMMARY PROCEDURES ON APPEAL
(1) Selection of Cases.
(a) By order of the court, consistent with the criteria set out at paragraph (5) below, any case may be set for oral argument before a panel of three justices (3JX panel).
(b) Any party may request or consent that a case be set for oral
argument before a 3JX panel. The court will consider and act upon such request, based upon criteria set out at paragraph (5) below.
(c) The court may direct that the matter be submitted on briefs, without oral argument, to a 3JX panel. See Rule 18(1).
(d) Except as noted in this rule, the procedure for cases
assigned to a 3JX panel shall be the same as otherwise provided in these
rules. Any motions made in a case assigned to a 3JX panel shall be acted upon by the panel. The panel may, in its discretion, refer any such motion to the full court for resolution.
(2) Disposition after Argument Before Three Justices; Additional
Briefing, etc.
(a) Any case which has been heard by a 3JX panel shall be
decided by unanimous order of the three justices. If the panel cannot reach a unanimous decision, it shall direct that the case be decided by the full court. The panel may order that a case be decided by the full
court in such other circumstances as it deems appropriate. The panel may, prior to determining that a unanimous decision cannot be reached,
require additional briefing. If decision by the full court is ordered, the court may issue an additional order setting forth matters to be reargued or rebriefed.
(b) Unless the court orders otherwise, whenever a 3JX panel
directs after oral argument that a case be decided by the full court, no further oral argument shall be held and the members of the court who
48
were not on the 3JX panel shall listen to the recording of the 3JX oral argument before deciding the case.
(3) Non-precedential Status of Orders. An order issued by a 3JX
panel shall have no precedential value, but it may, nevertheless, be cited or referenced in pleadings or rulings in any court in this state, so long as it is identified as a non-precedential order. Such non-precedential orders
may be cited and shall be controlling with respect to issues of claim preclusion, law of the case and similar issues involving the parties or facts of the case in which the order was issued. All citations to non-
precedential orders shall identify the court, docket number and date.
(4) [Repealed.]
(5) Criteria for Selection of Cases for 3JX Panel. Cases suitable for
oral argument before a 3JX panel include, but are not limited to:
(a) appeals involving claims of error in the application of settled law;
(b) appeals claiming an unsustainable exercise of discretion where the law governing that discretion is settled;
(c) appeals claiming insufficient evidence or a result against the weight of the evidence.
(6) Briefing, Argument, etc.
(a) In all cases selected for oral argument before a 3JX panel, briefs shall be limited to [9,500 words] 35 pages, exclusive of the table of contents, tables of citations and any addendum containing pertinent
texts of constitutions, statutes, rules, regulations and other such matters. Reply briefs shall be limited to [3,000 words] 10 pages.
(b) Oral argument will be limited to five minutes per side. In
the event of multiple parties on the same side, the court may determine,
either upon its own motion or upon motion of a party, an appropriate amount of time for oral argument.
(7) Motion for Rehearing or Reconsideration. Motions for
rehearing or reconsideration of any order assigning a case to a three-
justice panel or of any order issued by a three-justice panel shall be governed by Rule 22.
49
APPENDIX E
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 16 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 16 BRIEFS
(1) Briefs may be prepared using a printing, duplicating or copying process capable of producing a clear letter quality black image on white
paper, but shall not include ordinary carbon copies. If briefs timely filed do not conform to this rule or are not clearly legible, the clerk of the supreme court may require that new copies be substituted, but the filing
shall not thereby be deemed untimely.
Each brief shall be in pamphlet form upon good quality, nonclinging paper 8 ½ by 11 inches in size, with front and back covers of durable quality. Each brief shall have a minimum margin of one [and
one-half (1½)] inch on [all sides] the binding side and shall be firmly bound at the left margin. Any metal or plastic spines, fasteners or staples shall be flush with the covers and shall be covered by tape. The
covers shall be flush with the pages of the case. See also Rule 26(5).
If briefs are produced by commercial printing or duplicating firms, or, if produced otherwise and the covers to be described are available, the cover of the brief of the appealing party should be blue; that of the
opposing party, red; that of an intervenor or amicus curiae, green; and that of any reply brief, including the answering brief in accordance with
Rule 16(8), gray. The cover of the appendix, if separately printed, should be white.
The court will not accept any other method of binding unless prior approval has been obtained from the clerk of the supreme court.
(2) The front covers of the briefs and of appendices, if the appendices are separately produced, shall contain: (a) the name of this
court and the docket number of the case; (b) the title of the case; (c) the nature of the proceeding in this court, e.g., appeal by petition pursuant
to RSA 541: 6, and the name of the court or agency below; (d) the title of the document, e.g., brief for plaintiff; (e) the names, addresses and New Hampshire Bar identification numbers of counsel representing the party
on whose behalf the document is filed; and (f) the name of counsel who is to argue the case. See form in appendix.
50
(3) So far as possible, the brief of the moving party on the merits shall contain in the order here indicated:
(a) A table of contents, with page references, and a table of cases
listed alphabetically, a table of statutes and other authorities, with references to the pages of the briefs where they are cited.
(b) The questions presented for review, expressed in terms and circumstances of the case but without unnecessary detail. While the statement of a question need not be worded exactly as it was in the
appeal document, the question presented shall be the same as the question previously set forth in the appeal document. The statement of a
question presented will be deemed to include every subsidiary question fairly comprised therein. The moving party may argue in his brief any question of law not listed in his appeal document, but only if the
supreme court has granted a motion to add such question, and he has presented a record that is sufficient for the supreme court to decide the
questions presented. Motions to add a question may be filed only by a party who filed an appeal document (including a party who filed a cross-appeal), and shall be filed at least 20 days prior to the due date of the
moving party's brief. After each statement of a question presented, counsel shall make
specific reference to the volume and page of the transcript where the issue was raised and where an objection was made, or to the pleading
which raised the issue. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be cause for the court to disregard or strike the brief in whole or in part, and opposing counsel may so move within ten days of the filing of a brief
not in compliance with this rule.
(c) The constitutional provisions, statutes, ordinances, rules, or
regulations involved in the case, setting them out verbatim, and giving their citation. If the provisions involved are lengthy, their citation alone
will suffice at that point, and their pertinent text shall be set forth in an appendix.
(d) A concise statement of the case and a statement of facts material to the consideration of the questions presented, with
appropriate references to the appendix or to the record.
(e) A summary of argument, suitably paragraphed, which should
be a succinct, but accurate and clear, condensation of the argument made in the body of the brief. It should not be a mere repetition of the headings under which the argument is arranged.
51
(f) The argument, exhibiting clearly the points of fact and of law being presented, citing the authorities relied upon.
(g) A conclusion, specifying the relief to which the party believes
himself entitled.
(h) A statement that the party waives oral argument or that the
party requests oral argument. A party requesting oral argument may designate whether the party requests oral argument before a 3JX panel or the full court, and may set forth reasons why the party believes oral
argument is necessary or will be helpful to the court in deciding the case. If a party requests oral argument before the full court, and if the party
believes that more than 15 minutes to a side will be necessary for oral argument, the party may set forth why the party believes that good cause exists for granting additional time. The party shall designate the lawyer
to be heard if there are two or more lawyers on the party’s side.
(i) A copy of the decision(s) below that are being appealed or reviewed. If the appealed decision is in writing, a copy of that decision shall be included with the brief, and shall not be included in a separate
appendix. The appealing party shall, immediately before the signature line on the brief, certify either that the appealed decision is in writing and is appended to the brief, or that the appealed decision was not in
writing and therefore is not appended to the brief. Any brief not conforming with this rule may be rejected.
(4)(a) The brief of the opposing party shall conform to the foregoing
requirements, except that no statement of the case need be made beyond
what may be deemed necessary in correcting any inaccuracy or omission in the statement of the other side, and except that subsections (b), (c), and (h) of subsection (3) need not be included unless the opposing party
is dissatisfied with their presentation by the other side.
(b) Instead of a brief, the opposing party in a mandatory appeal may file a memorandum of law not to exceed [4,000 words] 15 pages in length. A memorandum of law need not comply with the requirements
for a brief set forth in this rule, including the requirements that briefs be bound in pamphlet form and have covers. A memorandum of law,
however, shall contain: (i) the argument, exhibiting clearly the points of fact and of law being presented, citing the authorities relied upon; and (ii) a conclusion, specifying the relief to which the party believes himself
entitled. A party who files a memorandum of law shall be deemed to have consented to the waiver of oral argument.
(5) Reply briefs shall conform to such parts of this rule as are applicable to the briefs of an opposing party, but need not contain a
52
summary of argument, regardless of their length, if appropriately divided by topical headings.
(6) Briefs and memoranda of law must be compact, logically
arranged with proper headings, concise and free from burdensome, irrelevant, and immaterial matter. Briefs and memoranda of law not complying with this section may be disregarded and stricken by the
supreme court.
(7) Unless specially ordered otherwise, the original and 8 copies of
the opening brief shall be filed with the clerk of the supreme court, in addition, 2 copies with counsel for each party separately represented, 2
copies with each [self-represented] pro se party, and like distribution shall be made of the opposing brief, opposing memorandum of law, or any other brief, all within the times specified in the applicable scheduling
order.
The party filing the opening brief may similarly file, and make like distribution of, a reply brief, which shall be filed by the earlier of 20 days following the submission of the opposing brief or opposing memorandum
of law, or 10 days before the date of oral argument. A reply brief may be filed after the expiration of the applicable time period only by leave of court. Responses to a reply brief shall not ordinarily be allowed. No
response to a reply brief may be filed except by permission of the court received in advance.
Whenever a party desires to present late authorities, newly enacted
legislation, or other intervening matters that were not available in time to
have been included in his brief, he may similarly file, and make like distribution of, such new matters up to and including the day of oral argument, or by leave of the supreme court thereafter.
The court shall not consider any brief or memorandum of law after
a case has been argued or submitted, unless the court has granted to the party offering to file the brief or memorandum of law special leave to do so in advance.
(8) If a cross-appeal is filed, the clerk shall determine which party
shall be deemed the moving party for the purposes of this rule, unless the parties agree and so notify the court. The brief of the opposing party shall contain the issues and argument involved in his appeal as well as
the answer to the brief of the moving party. The moving party may file an answering brief within the time specified in the scheduling order.
53
(9) All references in a brief or memorandum of law to the appendix or to the record must be accompanied by the appropriate page number. [See Rule 17.]
(10) The party filing a brief or memorandum of law shall conclude the pleading with a certification that the party has hand-delivered or has sent by first class mail two copies of the pleading to the other counsel in
the case.
The name of the party filing the brief or memorandum of law and
the name of the lawyer representing the party shall appear in type at the conclusion of the pleading, and the lawyer shall sign the pleading.
Names of persons not members of the bar or not parties shall not appear on the notice of appeal, the brief, the memorandum of law, or in the appendix unless they have complied with Rule 33 and received prior
written approval of the court. See Rule 33(2).
If an attorney provided limited representation to an otherwise unrepresented party by drafting a brief or memorandum of law to be filed by such party in a proceeding in which the attorney is not entering any
appearance or otherwise appearing in the case in the supreme court, the attorney is not required to disclose the attorney’s name on such pleading
to be used by that party; any pleading drafted by such limited representation attorney, however, must conspicuously contain the statement “This pleading was prepared with the assistance of a New
Hampshire attorney.” The unrepresented party must comply with this required disclosure.
(11) Each brief and memorandum of law shall consist of standard sized typewriter characters or size [13] 12 font produced on one side of
each leaf only. The [lines of] text shall be [spaced at a setting of 1.2] double spaced. [The text shall be left-aligned only. The pages of the brief shall be sequentially numbered, beginning with the cover page as page 1 and using only Arabic numerals for page numbers (e.g., 1,
2, 3), including for the table of contents and table of authorities. The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the
cover page.]
Except by permission of the court received in advance, no reply brief (or response thereto) shall exceed [3,000 words] 10 pages, and, except in a case with a cross-appeal, no other brief shall exceed [9,500
words] 35 pages, exclusive of pages containing the table of contents, tables of citations, and any addendum containing pertinent texts of
constitutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and other such matters. If a cross-appeal is filed, the opening brief and answering brief of the moving party shall not exceed [9,500 words] 35 pages, and the opposing brief of
54
the cross-appellant shall not exceed [14,000 words] 50 pages, exclusive of pages containing the table of contents, tables of citations, and any
addendum containing pertinent texts of constitutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and other such matters. The cross-appellant may file a
reply brief, which shall not exceed [3,000 words] 10 pages.
(12) Failure of the appealing party to file a brief shall constitute a
waiver of the appeal and the case shall be dismissed.
55
APPENDIX F
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 17 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]):
RULE 17 APPENDIX TO BRIEF
(1) The court will not ordinarily review any part of the record that
has not been provided to it in an appendix or transmitted to it. See Rule
13(3).
If there is to be an appendix of relevant documents or pleadings, the parties are encouraged to agree on its contents as an addendum to the moving party's brief or as a separate submission, if voluminous. If
the moving party's appendix is not deemed to be sufficient, the opposing party may prepare and file an appendix of such additional parts of the
record as an addendum to his brief or memorandum of law or, if voluminous, as a separate submission.
(2) The original and 8 copies of an appendix meeting the requirements of Rule 6(2) shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the
supreme court and its pages shall be sequentially numbered[, beginning with the cover page as page 1 and using only Arabic numerals for page numbers (e.g., 1, 2, 3), including for the table of contents. The
page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the cover page.]. The cover of the appendix should be white.
(3) The cost of producing the appendix shall be taxed as costs in the case, but if either party shall cause matter to be included in the
appendix unnecessarily, such as the full text of decisions of this court or irrelevant pleadings, the supreme court may impose the cost of producing such parts on that party, even though he may be the
prevailing party.
(4) At the beginning of the appendix there shall be inserted a table
of contents with references to the page of the appendix at which each item listed in the table of contents begins. When matter contained in the
transcript of proceedings is set out in the appendix, the page of the transcript at which such matter may be found shall be indicated in brackets immediately before the matter that is set out. Omissions in the
text of papers or of the transcript must be indicated by asterisks. Immaterial formal matters, e.g., captions, subscriptions,
acknowledgments, shall be omitted.
56
[(5) To facilitate reading multi-volume appendices in electronic form:
(a) Each volume of the appendix shall be designated by a
Roman numeral on the cover and shall be separately paginated, beginning with the cover page as page 1. All subsequent pages shall be numbered consecutively, including the table of contents, with
Arabic numerals only. Page numbering shall not continue across multiple volumes. For example, a brief with a two-volume appendix would cite to both the particular appendix volume and its page
number as “Apx. I at 117” and “Apx. II at 24.”
(b) The first volume of the appendix shall include a complete table of contents referencing all volumes of the appendix, and each individual volume shall include a table of contents for that volume.]
57
APPENDIX G
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 21 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 21 MOTIONS, BRIEF MEMORANDA, AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME
(1) Motions relating to substance shall be entered upon the filing with the clerk of the supreme court of the original and 7 copies of the
motion and a signed statement by counsel that a copy of the motion and notice of the filing have been mailed first class or delivered to opposing counsel. See Rule 26. Motions shall be upon good quality, nonclinging
paper 8 ½ by 11 inches in size. They shall consist of standard size typewriter characters or size [13] 12 font produced on one side of each
leaf only. The [lines of] text shall be [spaced at a setting of 1.2.] double spaced and they [The text shall be left-aligned only. Motions shall have sequentially numbered pages[, beginning with the first or cover
page as page 1 and using only Arabic numerals for page numbers (e.g., 1, 2, 3), including for any table of contents. The page number
may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page].
(2) Every motion to the court shall state with particularity the
grounds on which it is based and the order or relief sought. A memorandum of law, affidavits, or other papers in support of the motion may be filed with it.
(3) The original and 7 copies of objections to a motion relating to
substance may be filed within 10 days from the date the motion has been filed in the clerk's office. The grounds of objections shall be stated with particularity. A memorandum of law, affidavits, or other papers in
support of the objections may be filed with the objections.
(3-A) No reply to an objection may be filed without permission of
the court received in advance. A motion for permission to file a reply must be filed within 10 days from the date the objection has been filed in
the clerk's office; provided, however, that the court may act upon a motion prior to the expiration of said ten-day period. Any reply to an objection filed without prior permission of the court shall not be
considered by the court.
(4) Oral argument will not be heard on any motion, except at the invitation of the court.
58
(5) If a motion does not relate to substance, but relates solely to scheduling or procedure, an original and one copy shall be filed with the
clerk of the supreme court, with copies to opposing counsel. See Rule 26. All motions relating solely to scheduling or procedure shall state
whether opposing counsel consents.
(6) No motion to extend time to file an appeal document will be
accepted unless accompanied by the required entry fee. See also Rule 5(1). No motion for late entry of an appeal document will be accepted
unless accompanied by the appeal document and the required entry fee and unless the appeal document conforms to applicable rules. Motions to extend time to file an appeal document and motions for late entry of
an appeal document are not favored and shall be granted only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances. No court or agency other than
the supreme court may extend the time to file an appeal document in the supreme court or permit late entry of an appeal document in the supreme court.
(6-A). Extensions of time to file briefs.
(a) Unless the scheduling order states otherwise, any party may obtain an automatic extension of no more than fifteen days within
which to file briefs (or memoranda of law) by filing an original and one copy of an assented-to notice of automatic extension of time. The notice shall affirmatively state that all parties assent to the extension, and the
notice MUST set forth the new dates upon which all briefs (or memoranda of law) for all parties shall be due, including the date for
reply briefs. No such date shall be extended by more than fifteen days. Upon the filing of the notice, the new briefing schedule set forth therein shall become effective without further order of the court.
(b) A maximum of two assented-to notices of automatic
extension of time may be filed by the parties collectively. Thereafter, no
additional extension of time will be granted by the court absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
(c) Extensions of time of more than fifteen days, or
extensions when all parties do not consent, may be requested only by
motion to the court. Extensions of more than fifteen days are not favored.
(7) A single justice may rule on all non-dispositive motions and
may issue any non-dispositive order. A single justice may rule upon
requests to withdraw or dismiss an appeal filed by the appellant, may dismiss an appeal pursuant to Rule 5(4), Rule 15(2) or Rule 16(12); and
59
may dismiss an appeal without prejudice upon procedural grounds. Any order of a single justice shall state which justice so ruled.
(8) The clerk of the supreme court may rule on all motions relating
to scheduling except for motions for expedited consideration, motions to extend time to file an appeal document, and motions for late entry of an appeal document. The clerk may issue briefing and other scheduling
orders. The clerk may issue orders requiring parties to file necessary documents with the court or to cure technical defects in filings, including orders requiring parties to refile a notice of appeal on the proper form.
The clerk may grant or refer to the court dispositive motions to which all parties consent, and non-dispositive motions to which no objection is
filed or all parties consent except for motions to extend time to file an appeal document and motions for late entry of an appeal document. With respect to other motions filed between the issuance of the
scheduling order pursuant to Rule 12-B and the date of oral argument or submission of the case on the briefs, the clerk may refer such motions to
the court or issue an order to the effect that no ruling will be made on the motion prior to oral argument or submission of the case on the briefs, but that the parties may address the motion during their allotted
oral argument time if oral argument is held. In mandatory appeals, the clerk may issue orders accepting the case. Any order of the clerk shall state that it is issued pursuant to this rule.
(9) Any motion to reconsider an order issued by a single justice or
the clerk shall be filed within ten days from the date of the issuance of the order. A motion to reconsider an order issued by a single justice shall be referred to the court for decision. A motion to reconsider an
order issued by the clerk shall be referred to a single justice or to the court for decision.
(10) Whenever the court issues an order requiring or permitting a party to file a brief memorandum, the brief memorandum shall be
entered upon the filing with the clerk of the supreme court of the original and 7 copies of the brief memorandum and a signed statement by counsel that a copy of the brief memorandum and notice of the filing
have been mailed first class or delivered to opposing counsel. See Rule 26. Brief memoranda shall be upon good quality, nonclinging paper 8 ½
by 11 inches in size. They shall consist of standard size typewriter characters or size [13] 12 font produced on one side of each leaf only. The [lines of] text shall be [spaced at a setting of 1.2.] double spaced
and they [The text shall be left-aligned only. Brief memoranda] shall have sequentially numbered pages[, beginning with the first or
cover page as page 1 and using only Arabic numerals for page numbers (e.g., 1, 2, 3), including for any table of contents. The page
number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page].
60
(11) Any order or decision by the court disposing of the case on the
merits shall be deemed to be a denial of any pending non-dispositive motion.
61
APPENDIX H
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 22 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 22 MOTION FOR REHEARING OR RECONSIDERATION
(1) A motion for rehearing or reconsideration shall be entered upon the filing with the clerk of the supreme court of the original and 7 copies
of the motion and a certificate by counsel that a copy of the motion and notice of the filing have been mailed first class or delivered to opposing counsel and to the clerk of the court or agency from which the appeal or
transfer was taken, and (in the case of an appeal from an administrative agency) to the attorney general.
(2) Any motion for rehearing or reconsideration shall be filed within
10 days from the date of the opinion or dismissal or summary decision in
matters in which an opinion is not issued. The motion shall state with particularity the points of law or fact that in the professional judgment of the movant the court has overlooked or misapprehended and shall
contain such argument in support of the motion as the movant desires to present, but the motion shall not exceed [3,000 words] 10 pages. Oral
argument in support of the motion shall not be permitted, except at the invitation of the court.
(3) No answer to a motion for rehearing or reconsideration shall be required unless requested by the court, but any answer or objection must be filed within 10 days from the date the motion was filed.
(3-A) If an answer/objection to a motion for rehearing or
reconsideration is filed, no reply to the answer/objection may be filed without permission of the court received in advance. A motion for permission to file a reply must be filed within 10 days from the date the
answer/objection has been filed in the clerk’s office; provided, however, that the court may act upon a motion for rehearing or reconsideration
prior to the expiration of said ten-day period. Any reply to an answer/objection filed without prior permission of the court shall not be considered by the court.
(4) If a motion for rehearing or reconsideration is granted, the court
may make a final disposition of the case without reargument or may
restore it to the calendar for reargument or resubmission or make such other orders as are deemed appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
62
(5) Consecutive motions for rehearing or reconsideration shall not be considered or acted upon by the court.
63
APPENDIX I
The suggestion is to amend Supreme Court Rule 26 as follows (new
material is in [bold and brackets]; deleted material is in
strikethrough format):
RULE 26 FILING AND SERVICE
(1) Papers required or permitted to be filed in this court shall be filed with the clerk of this court and shall be upon good quality,
nonclinging paper 8 1/2 by 11 inches in size. With the exception of documents attached to a filing [or submitted on a court form], the type used in all filings shall consist of standard size typewriter characters or
size [13] 12 font. Filing may be accomplished by first class mail addressed to the clerk of this court, but filing shall not be timely unless
the papers are received by the clerk within the time fixed by rule or law. Filings postmarked at least 2 days prior to the time fixed by rule or law shall be deemed timely.
If the clerk’s office provides a drop box for the filing of documents, the contents of the drop box shall be removed by the clerk’s office at the
start of business each day that the court is open for business. The following rules shall determine the date of filing for documents filed via
the drop box: (a) Any person filing a document or documents via the drop box
shall indicate the date and time of filing on the document or documents or on the envelope containing the document or documents, and the document shall be considered to have been filed on the date indicated,
except if the date indicated is a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or other day upon which the clerk's office is closed, the document shall be
considered to have been filed on the next day that the court is open for business. If a document or documents deposited in the drop box does not include both a date and time of filing, the document will be deemed
to have been filed on the date that the document or documents are removed from the drop box.
(b) The court is NOT responsible for any documents placed in the drop box which are lost, stolen, misplaced, or destroyed. A party
may contact the court during business hours to verify that a document placed in the drop box has been received by the clerk's office.
(2) Copies of all [documents] papers filed by any party shall, at or before the time of filing, be served by a party or person acting for him on
64
all other parties to the case. Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on counsel. Copies of motions to extend time to file an
appeal document, appeal documents, and motions for rehearing or reconsideration shall be filed with the clerk of the court or agency from
which the appeal or transfer is taken, and (in the case of an appeal from an administrative agency) with the attorney general, as specified in rules 5, 21, or 22.
(3) (a) Service may be personal or by first class mail. Personal
service includes delivery of the copy to a secretary or other responsible
person at the office of counsel. Service by first class mail is complete on mailing.
(b) In any case when all parties are represented by lawyers, all
parties’ counsel may agree that pleadings filed and communications
addressed to the court may be furnished to all other counsel by email. An agreement may be filed with the court by stipulation. Such
agreement shall list the email address(es) at which counsel agrees to be served. The email header shall include the caption of the case and its docket number. Pleadings and communications furnished in accordance
with this rule shall be attached to the email in .PDF file format. Documents so furnished may have on their signature lines a copy of counsel's signature, a facsimile thereof, “/s/ [counsel's name]” as used in
the federal ECF system, or similar notation indicating the document was signed.
(4) In the case of any notice of appeal or transfer filed in this court,
counsel for the filing party shall include with the filing a statement
certifying that every issue specifically raised (a) has been presented to the court below and (b) has been properly preserved for appellate review by a contemporaneous objection or, where appropriate, by a properly filed
pleading. Failure of counsel to comply with this requirement will result in the assessment of costs and attorney’s fees by the court and may also
result in the rejection of the notice of appeal as to that issue.
(4-A) When an attorney provides limited representation to an
otherwise unrepresented party by drafting a document to be filed by such party with the supreme court in a proceeding in which the attorney is not
entering any appearance or otherwise appearing in the case in the supreme court, the attorney is not required to disclose the attorney’s name on such pleading to be used by that party; any pleading drafted by
such limited representation attorney, however, must conspicuously contain the statement “This pleading was prepared with the assistance of a New Hampshire attorney.” The unrepresented party must comply with
this required disclosure.
65
(5) Notices of appeal and all other [documents] papers required or permitted to be filed in this court shall have sequentially numbered
pages[, beginning with the first or cover page as page 1 and using only Arabic numerals for page numbers (e.g., 1, 2, 3), including for
any table of contents. The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page].
(6) Notices of appeal and all other papers required or permitted to be filed in this court shall be duplicated on non-clinging paper. Clinging paper shall include any duplication done by a wet-process machine or
any electrostatic duplicating method which creates static electricity between the pages.
(7) All [documents] papers presented for filing shall contain a
statement of compliance with sections (2), (3), and (4). [If a document presented for filing is subject to a word limitation, see, e.g., Rule
16(11) and Rule 22(2), the document shall contain a statement of
compliance with the word limitation and a certification identifying the number of words in the document.]
(8) All filings and correspondence, except the initial filing of the appeal document, shall contain the supreme court's docket number.
(9) All changes of mail address shall be filed with the clerk. Whenever notice to a party is required, notice to the last mail address on
file shall be deemed notice to, and binding on, the party.
(10) Any pleading filed by counsel who is a member of the New
Hampshire Bar shall include counsel's New Hampshire Bar identification number.