Date post: | 19-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Personality Research
Research approach not always ‘objective’ content-based decision– Approaches historically associated w/
prominent theories & have been politicized– Different approaches hold different
assumptions about human nature & have different goals for personality research
Personality Research
Cronbach (1957), ‘Individual differences have been an annoyance…to the experimenter.’– What did he mean?
Correlational approach more appropriate for personality research?– Individual differences central (starts where experimental
leaves off)
Clinical & Experimental Attitudes
Clinical: Discovery of totality of person– Idiographic, individual, humanistic, speculative
Experimental: Control, general laws– Nomothetic, typical person, scientific, objective
Two opposing cultures
Clinical Approach
Intensive study of small n– Growth, development, change, pathology (L)
Psychology of the disordered personality Interpretation of ambiguous phenomenon
– Dreams, random thoughts, slips of tongue No standardized assessment & Hos untestable
» Projective tests, interviews, therapy» Poor reliability, validity
Experimental Approach
Systematic manipulation of Vs – Reject clinical, correlational as speculative
» Projective tests, Qaires
– Wundt, Pavlov, Watson, Skinner Process (T: isolate, manipulate causes of behavior)
Limited Vs & external validity
Correlational Approach
Emphasizes individual differences– Relies on introspection (Qaires)
– Assumes people accurately report behavior
– Strong tradition of measurement (Galton)
Correlational Approach
Structure & process– Dimensions of personality key (Spearman)– How dimensions interrelate & impact behavior
Self-Reports
Central to correlational approach & personality psychology– Controversy regarding their reliability and
validity– People may lie or distort self, not know or
remember past behaviors– Pros Cons
Activity 2: Self-Report
Describe the arguments for & against self-reports.
What variables impact the strength of self-other agreement (see Funder et al., 1995, p. 12-13)?
Does self-other agreement indicate the validity of self-reports? Explain.
PLEASE TURN THIS IN AT THE END OF CLASS!
Reaction Paper 1: Self-Reports
Should self-reports be used in personality psychology? Explain your position.
PLEASE TURN THIS IN AT THE END OF CLASS!