The Village at Grand Traverse Phase 1
Stormwater Management Recommendations
December 22, 2011
Prepared for: Gourdie-Frasier, Inc. 123 West Front Street
Traverse City, Michigan 49684 (231) 946-6874
Prepared by: King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc.
40595 Koppernick Road Canton, Michigan 48187
(734) 354-0594
King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc. December 22, 2011 VGT Phase 1 – Stormwater Recommendations 2
INTRODUCTION King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc. was retained by Gourdie-Frasier, Inc. to provide recommendations on how wetland vegetation might be used to increase the ability of stormwater management basins to detain and treat stormwater as part of Phase 1 of The Village at Grand Traverse (VGT) development. Stormwater management is proposed to occur in two locations, with both locations consisting of a series of three tiered basin. One recognized approach to using wetland vegetation in stormwater management can be described as the best management practice (BMP) “constructed wetland use in nonpoint source control” as defined by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s Guidebook of Best Management Practices for Michigan Watersheds. A subset of this BMP is a pond/wetland system. Using the MDEQ’s Guidebook as a framework, we offer the following recommendations for the development of a pond/wetland system at VGT Phase 1. PROJECT GOALS Typical goals in pond/wetland systems are to develop a stand of vigorous wetland vegetation that slows stormwater flow through ponding and meandering flow pathways, provides opportunity for suspended solids to settle out of the stormwater, and uses vegetation growth to take up nutrients and soluble pollutants in the water. CONCEPTUAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS As shown in Figures 1-3, we recommend creating microtopograpraphic features that create a heterogeneous surface along the bottom of the first and second basins. The goal of creating these varying water depths is to establish differences in environmental conditions that can support a greater diversity of vegetation. The different elements are described as follows:
Plunge Pool. This pool dissipates energy and allows for initial settling of suspended
sediments. Under normal conditions (i.e. not during a storm event), this pool would have a minimum water depth of 3 feet.
Low Marsh Zone. Water depths of 3-9 inches under normal conditions.
High Marsh Zone. Water depths of 0-3 inches under normal conditions.
Pond. Water depths greater than 2 feet under normal conditions. The proposed design establishes a sinuous stormwater pathway in the first and second basins within the Low Marsh Zone. This pathway is a way to create a longer treatment train for runoff generated by first-flush and other lower-volume events (first-flush runoff is typically understood to contain a higher concentration of pollutants and therefore in need of maximum treatment). If runoff volumes are sufficient to fill both the first and second basins, the excess water will flow into the final “pond” basin. This pond will provide necessary storage volume in the system while also providing final treatment of any remaining suspended sediments. To aid in the establishment of plants in the first and second tier basins, we recommend spreading six inches of topsoil over the basins and then broadcasting a native wetland seed mix. A suggested planting mix is provided in Figure 4. Our goal is to provide a diverse assemblage of plants that are native to Michigan and recognized in the trade as capable of withstanding the hydrologic conditions anticipated in these basins. Although the proposed wetland plants can withstand inundation, excessive water depths for extended periods of time will reduce their vigor. It is also our understanding that the native soils are very impermeable, thereby making infiltration of stormwater not feasible. Therefore, we recommend placing some engineering constraints on the maximum depths and duration of flooding in the vegetated cells.
King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc. December 22, 2011 VGT Phase 1 – Stormwater Recommendations 3
We have represented those constraints as slow-release control structures and emergency spillways in the conceptual plans and have developed the planting schemes with a targeted maximum increase in water depth of 12 inches during storm events and a return to “normal” water levels within 72 hours. The proposed basin design also has the potential for the development of public access and educational programs. The berms that divide the individual basins in each series can be maintained as trails, which afford the public the opportunity to walk “into” the system and experience its component parts. Coupled with informational signage, it is possible to use this system as a demonstration that educates the public on how stormwater runoff can affect our natural environment and how BMPs such as this wetland/pond system seek to mitigate those impacts. The conceptual plans identifies possible trail alignments and educational sign locations. MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE RECOMENDATIONS Once constructed, the stormwater basins should be inspected annually and maintained as needed to ensure proper function. Typical inspections should include tasks such as:
Inspections for failures such as eroding banks or undermining of riprap;
An estimation of sediment accumulation in plunge pools and ponds;
An examination of plant establishment and vigor;
An examination of invasive plant species establishment such as purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), giant reed (Phragmites australis) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea); and
Inspection of the operation of any mechanical structures such as water control structures.
Typical maintenance should occur as warranted by the inspection results and may include such tasks as:
Removal of trash, debris, and excessive sediment deposits;
Mowing of access corridors;
Harvesting of wetland vegetation to promote plant growth and uptake of soluble nutrients and pollutants;
Controlling invasive species using best management practices; and
Reseeding areas of sparse vegetation. WATER QUALITY MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality has established water quality rules mandating that toxic substances shall not be present in the surface waters of the state at levels that are or may become injurious to the public health, safety, or welfare, plant and animal life, or the designated uses of the waters. Scientific studies suggest that pond/wetland systems such as the one proposed here are effective at reducing the contribution of pollutants from a developed site that may degrade natural systems such as wetlands and streams. Furthermore, stormwater detention systems in general function to reduce spikes in peak flow volume in receiving waters. However, the actual impact of any specific development on adjacent natural systems can only be determined through site specific monitoring. The receiving water for this site is Acme Creek. How stormwater from this development may affect the water quality of Acme Creek could be monitored by establishing a water testing program. Parameters that can be used to judge possible impacts include the composition of the aquatic macroinvertebrate population, dissolved oxygen concentration, water temperature,
King & MacGregor Environmental, Inc. December 22, 2011 VGT Phase 1 – Stormwater Recommendations 4
specific conductivity, pH, volatile organic compounds, total organic carbon, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids and E. coli, of which have testing methods established by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Possible changes to the flow regime in Acme Creek can be evaluated by installing and monitoring stream gauges that measure both velocity and water level. To facilitate such a program, we recommend establishing two fixed testing locations with one at the upstream point where the Acme Creek enters the property and one at the downstream point where Acme Creek leaves the property. A recommended monitoring and reporting schedule is as follows:
Monitoring & Reporting Frequency
Study Parameter Baseline Year 1 Years 2-4 Years 5+ Macroinvertebrates Prior
Dissolved Oxygen To Monthly Quarterly Spring/Fall
Water Temperature construction
Specific Conductivity
pH
Volatile Organic Compounds
Total Organic Carbon
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Water Velocity & Level
Maintenance Inspection Annually Annually Annually
A comparison of the upstream and downstream values over time can be used by interested parties to develop lessons learned from how this BMP was implemented at VGT Phase 1 and how its use might be improved for other projects in the future. REFERENCES Center for Watershed Protection, National Pollutant Removal Performance Database, version 3. 2007
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Guidebook of Best Management Practices for Michigan Watersheds. 1998 Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Bureau, Water Quality Standards.
Administrative Rules filed 200
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Field Operations Manual: Wadeable Streams Assessment. 2004
11+00
12+00
13+00
Pon
d
Low
Mar
sh(3
-6" w
ater
dep
th)
Hig
h M
arsh
(0-3
" wat
er d
epth
)
Slo
w re
leas
e w
ater
cont
rol s
truct
ure
Mic
ropo
ol
01
Concept Plan ~Western Basins
NO
RTHN
Plu
nge
Poo
l
40'
80'
0
1"=
40'
20'
Em
erge
ncy
over
flow
Pro
ject
Des
crip
tion
Sig
n
Gra
ssed
sw
ale
over
flow
Hab
itat
stru
ctur
e
22+
0023
+00
24+
0025
+00
26+
0027
+00
Pon
d
02
Concept Plan ~Eastern Basins
NO
RTHN
Ove
rall
Pro
ject
Des
crip
tion
Sig
n
Hig
h M
arsh
(0-3
" wat
erde
pth)
60'
120'
0
1"=
60'
30'
Mic
ropo
ol
Em
erge
ncy
over
flow
Slo
w re
leas
e w
ater
cont
rol s
truct
ure
Low
Mar
sh(3
-6" w
ater
dept
h)
Hik
ing
trail
Plu
nge
Poo
lP
roje
ct D
etai
l Sig
n
Gra
ssed
swal
eov
erflo
w
Hab
itat
Stru
ctur
e
03
Typical Section
NO
RTHN
Hig
h M
arsh
(0-3
" wat
erde
pth)
Mai
nten
ance
acc
ess
berm
Plu
nge
Poo
lP
ond
Low
Mar
sh(3
-9" w
ater
dept
h) Typi
cal C
ross
Sec
tion
04
Planting Scheme
NO
RTHN
SE
ED
MIX
:FO
RB
SS
PE
CIE
SC
OM
MO
N N
AM
ER
ATE
(PLS
OZ.
/AC
.)Ac
orus
cal
amus
Sw
eet Flag
2.2
Alism
a pl
anta
go-a
quat
ica
Mud Plantain
1.1
Alliu
m c
ernu
umN
odding O
nion
2.2
Anem
one
cana
dens
isCanada Anem
one
0.5
Ange
lica
atro
purp
urea
Angelica
8.0
Ascl
epia
s inc
arna
taSw
am
p M
ilkw
eed
6.0
Aste
r nov
ae-a
nglia
eN
ew
England Aster
2.0
Aste
r um
bella
tus
Flat-topped Aster
0.5
Bolto
nia
aste
roid
esFalse Aster
0.5
Eupa
toriu
m m
acul
atum
Joe Pye W
eed
1.0
Eupa
toriu
m p
erfo
liatu
mBoneset
1.0
Gent
iana
and
rew
siiBottle G
entain
0.6
Hele
nium
aut
umna
leSneezew
eed
1.1
Helio
psis
helia
ntho
ides
Early Sunflow
er
1.1
Iris v
irgin
ica
shre
vei
Southern Blue Flag
4.4
Lobe
lia c
ardi
nalis
Cardinal Flow
er
1.0
Lobe
lia si
phili
tica
Great Blue Lobelia
2.0
Lyco
pus a
mer
ican
usW
ater H
orehound
2.0
Lysim
achi
a qu
adrif
lora
Prairie Loosestrife
0.5
Pycn
anth
emum
virg
inia
num
Mountain M
int
1.1
Rudb
ecki
a hi
rta
Black-eyed Susan
2.2
Solid
ago
ridde
llii
Riddell's G
oldenrod
1.1
Thal
ictr
um d
asyc
arpu
mPurple M
eadow
Rue
3.3
Verb
ena
hast
ata
Blue Vervain
2.0
Vern
onia
fasc
icul
ata
Com
mon Ironw
eed
2.2
Vero
nica
stru
m v
irgin
icum
Culver's Root
0.5
Zizia
aur
eaG
olden Alexanders
4.0
GR
AM
INO
IDS
SP
EC
IES
CO
MM
ON
NA
ME
RA
TE (P
LS O
Z./A
C.)
Andr
opog
on g
arar
dii
Big Bluestem
13.1
Brom
us c
iliat
usFringed Brom
e7.
8Ca
lam
agro
stis
cana
dens
isBlue Joint G
rass
0.5
Care
x be
bbii
Bebb's O
val Sedge
2.2
Care
x co
mos
aBristly Sedge
2.2
Care
x hy
ster
icin
aPorcupine Sedge
2.2
Care
x lu
pulin
aCom
mon H
op Sedge
2.2
Care
x st
ipat
aCom
mon Fox Sedge
2.2
Elym
us c
anad
ensis
Canada W
ild Rye
7.8
Elym
us v
irgin
icus
Virginia W
ild Rye
7.8
Glyc
eria
gra
ndis
Reed M
anna G
rass
2.2
Junc
us c
anad
ensis
Canada Rush
0.5
Pani
cum
virg
atum
Sw
itch G
rass
2.2
Scirp
us a
trov
irens
Dark-green Bulrush
1.1
Scirp
us c
yper
inus
Wool G
rass
0.6
Scirp
us v
alid
usG
reat Bulrush
1.1
Sorg
astr
um n
utan
sIndian G
rass
14.4
Spar
tina
pect
inat
aCord G
rass
2.2
TRE
ES
& S
HR
UB
S:
SP
EC
IES
CO
MM
ON
NA
ME
Ace
r rub
rum
Red
Map
leA
cer s
acch
arum
Sug
ar M
aple
Cel
tis o
ccid
enta
lisH
ackb
erry
Pla
tanu
s oc
cide
ntal
isS
ycam
ore
Pin
us s
trobu
sW
hite
Pin
eA
mel
anch
ier l
aevi
sS
ervi
cebe
rry
Aro
nia
prun
ifolia
Cho
kebe
rry
Cor
nus
stol
onife
raR
ed T
wig
Dog
woo
dP
hyso
carp
us o
pulif
oliu
sN
ineb
ark
Sam
bucu
s ca
nade
nsis
Am
eric
an E
lder
SA
ND
MO
UN
DS
:
WH
OLE
TR
EE
S:
Who
le tr
ees
to b
e in
stal
led
horiz
onta
lly. T
rees
sha
ll be
a m
inim
um o
f 20
feet
long
and
12
inch
es in
dia
met
er a
t bre
ast h
eigh
t (db
h). D
o no
t trim
dow
n fin
e st
ruct
ure
of li
mbs
. At l
east
50%
of e
ntire
stru
ctur
e sh
all e
xten
d 6
inch
es a
bove
pro
ject
ed h
igh
wat
er le
vel.
San
d pi
led
a m
inim
um o
f 18
inch
es in
dep
th a
nd p
lace
d so
that
they
are
sur
roun
ded
by a
min
imum
of 3
0 fe
et o
f wat
er m
easu
ring
at le
ast 1
8 in
ches
in d
epth
. The
san
d m
ound
sha
llha
ve a
t lea
st a
200
squ
are
foot
are
a th
at is
18
inch
es a
bove
the
proj
ecte
d no
rmal
wat
er le
vel.
HA
BIT
AT
STR
UC
TUR
ES
: