15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst1 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
ProfessorPoul Erik Morthorst
Risø DTU
Photos:
DONGEnergy A/S
The Economicsof
Wind Power
Status and Perspectives
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst2 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
The main parameters governing wind powereconomics include the following:
•Investment costs, including auxiliarycosts for foundation, gridconnection,and so on.
•Operation and maintenance costs•Electricity production / average wind
speed•Turbine lifetime•Discount rate
The main Socioeconomic Parameters
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst3 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Investment(1000 €/MW)
Share(%)
Turbine (ex works) 928 75.6Foundation 80 6.5Electric installation 18 1.5Gridconnection 109 8.9Control systems 4 0.3Consultancy 15 1.2Land 48 3.9Financial costs 15 1.2Road 11 0.9Total 1227 100
Investments in a 1 MW turbine
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst4 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Turbine Investment Cost in differentCountries
2006
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Italy UK
Netherlan
ds
Portug
a l
Germany
Japan
Greec
eSpa
in
Canada
Denmark US
Norway
1000
€/M
W
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst5 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Development of Turbine Size in differentCountries
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
kW
GermanySpainDenmarkUSAUKIndia
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst6 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Operation and Maintenance
•O&M costs: Approx. 1.5c€/kWh
O&M components
•Insurance•Regular maintenance•Repair•Spare parts•Administration
Insurance13%
Service andspare parts
26%Miscellaneous
17%Power from the
grid5%
Administration21%
Land rent18%
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst7 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Operation and Maintenance
•O&M costs: Approx. 1.5c€/kWh
O&M components
•Insurance•Regular maintenance•Repair•Spare parts•Administration
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19År i produktion
Kr/k
Wh
55 kW
150 kW
225 kW
300 kW
500 kW
600 kW
660 kW
750 kW
Years inOperation
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst8 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Cash flow for Wind Power plant
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst9 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Cash flow for Wind Power plant
1520% of total costs
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst10 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Cash flow for Wind Power plant
NPC = I/(1+i)0 + C1/(1+i)1 + C2/(1+i)2 + …+ C20/(1+i)20
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst11 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Cash flow for Wind Power plant
NPV = I/(1+i)0 + C1/(1+i)1 + C2/(1+i)2 + …+ C20/(1+i)20
Average cost over the lifetime = Levellised cost (PMT)
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst12 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Calculation of Unit Cost
Number of full load hours:
The number of hours theturbine has to run atmaximum capacity toproduce the total annualproduction
0
500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
4.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Fullloadhours
Year
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst13 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Calculation of Unit Cost
Number of full load hours:
The number of hours theturbine has to run atmaximum capacity toproduce the total annualproduction
0
500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
3.000
3.500
4.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Fullloadhours
Year
Unit cost = Levellised costs / Average Annual Production
= c€/kWh (approx. 67 c€/kWh)
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst14 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Production costs
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst15 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Importance of discount rate
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst16 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
SocioEconomics vs. Business EconomicsBasic conditions
SocioEconomics BusinessEconomics
Prices Real terms(no inflation)
Nominal prices(including inflation)
Discount rate Socio determinedReal terms(6% p.a. in Denmark)
Market determinedNominal termsIncluding riskpremium
Revenues Normally only costs Payment schedulesimportant
Conditions Excluding taxes etc. Including taxes,depreciation rulesetc.
Lifetime Technical lifetime(20 years)
Economic lifetime(< 20 years)
Typically 58% p.a.
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst17 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
A real SocioEconomic analysis alsoincludes…
SocioEconomics BusinessEconomics
Adjustmentfactor
Investment issubstitutingalternative use
Not considered
Externalities Issues not included inprices and costs
Not considered
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst18 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Development of Unit Cost
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1985 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2001 2004 2006
c€/k
Wh Coastal site
Inland site
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst19 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Increase in Turbine Price in differentCountries
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Denmark
Greece
Netherlands US
Portug
alI ta
lyJap
an
Norway
Spain UK
German
y
Canada
20062004
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst20 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Experience Curve for Wind Power Unit Cost
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1985 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2001 2004 2006 2010 2015
c€/k
Wh
Coastal area
Inland site
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst21 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Experience Curve for Wind Power Unit Cost
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1985 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2001 2004 2006 2010 2015
c€/k
Wh
Coastal area
Inland site
Learning rate of 10% estimated:
•Each time global capacitydoubles unit cost is expectedlydecreased by 10%
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst22 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Wind Power Unit Cost by 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1985 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2001 2004 2006 2010 2015
c€/k
Wh
Coastal area
Inland site
Global Capacity:
•Doubled in three years time 4.3 –5.0 c€/kWh•Doubled in five years time 4.8 –5.5 c€/kWh
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst23 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Wind Power compared to ConventionalPlants
Displaced or partly displaced cost components:
•Fuel costs
•Cost of CO2emissions (as given by theEuropean Trading System for CO2, ETS)
•Operation and maintenance costs
•Capital cost, including planning and site work
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst24 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Wind Power Compared to Natural Gas PowerPlant –changing fuel costs
0102030405060708090
100
Natural gas(40$/bbl)
Natural gas(60$/bbl)
Natural gas(120$/bbl)
WindPower
coastal site
WindPower
inland site
€/MWh
Regulation costs
CO2 25€/t
Basic
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst25 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Wind Power Compared to Coal Fired PowerPlant –changing costs of CO2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
€/MWh
Regulation costs
CO2
Basic
15/3/2009Poul Erik Morthorst26 Risø DTU, Technical University of Denmark
Conclusions
•Wind Power Economics are fairly simple with only afew important parameters
–The annual windgenerated power production is tantamount
•Operation and Maintenance Costs are gettingincreasingly important
–Improved reliability of turbine and fewer service visits
•Wind power has experienced a learning rate of 10%p.a.
–Disrupted in 2004 by a price increase of more than 20%
•Increasing fuel prices needed to make wind powereconomic competitive to conventional plants
–The European Emission Trading scheme on CO2 will not do thejob alone