+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf ·...

Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf ·...

Date post: 07-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
C.H.1983/D:2 Statistics Committee Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature on the AtlanticContinental Shelf Trina A. 1I0smer University Computing Center University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 ABSTRACT Box-Jenkins Time Series techniques autoregressive, integrated, moving average water temperature data collected for the Continental Shelf, (Cape Hatteras, NC, to 1950 through 1980 by lunar month. are used to fit seasonal (ARIMA) time series models to Northeastern United States Cape Sable, NS) for the years , Ce For geographical as well as oceanographical reasons the area is subdivided into six major areas: Nova Scotia, Gulf of Maine East, Gulf of MaineWest, Georges Bank, Middle Atlantic, and Gulf Stream. Each major area is further split into a shallow area (water depth less the 150 meters) and a deep area (water depth greater than 150 meters). For each of the twelve regions, ARIMA models are developed. The process used to develop the ARIMA models as well as the parameter estimates, residual mean-squares and Q-statistics are given. Tho performance of the fitted models is displayed by plotting the observed and forecastcd temperature over time. ARIMA models are developed primarily for forecasting purposes. In this paper we are more interested in comparing the form and content of the various time series models in order to better und erstand the ocean dynamics. . For example, we find one basic ARIMA model that fi ts all the series but with variations on the necessary lag time parameters. ThiiJ variation supports existing hypotheses about theunderstanding of water movement in the particular areas.
Transcript
Page 1: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

C.H.1983/D:2Statistics Committee

Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperatureon the AtlanticContinental Shelf

Trina A. 1I0smerUniversity Computing CenterUniversity of Massachusetts

Amherst, MA 01003

ABSTRACT

Box-Jenkins Time Series techniquesautoregressive, integrated, moving averagewater temperature data collected for theContinental Shelf, (Cape Hatteras, NC, to1950 through 1980 by lunar month.

are used to fit seasonal(ARIMA) time series models toNortheastern United States

Cape Sable, NS) for the years

,Ce

For geographical as well as oceanographical reasons the area issubdivided into six major areas: Nova Scotia, Gulf of Maine East, Gulfof MaineWest, Georges Bank, Middle Atlantic, and Gulf Stream. Eachmajor area is further split into a shallow area (water depth less the150 meters) and a deep area (water depth greater than 150 meters). Foreach of the twelve regions, ARIMA models are developed. The processused to develop the ARIMA models as well as the parameter estimates,residual mean-squares and Q-statistics are given. Tho performance ofthe fitted models is displayed by plotting the observed and forecastcdtemperature over time.

ARIMA models are developed primarily for forecasting purposes. Inthis paper we are more interested in comparing the form and content ofthe various time series models in order to better und erstand the oceandynamics. . For example, we find one basic ARIMA model that fi ts all theseries but with variations on the necessary lag time parameters. ThiiJvariation supports existing hypotheses about theunderstanding of watermovement in the particular areas.

funk-haas
Neuer Stempel
Page 2: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

C.M.1983/D:2Statistics Committee

This paper not to be cited without prior reference to the author

Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperatureon the Atlantic Continental Shelf

by

Trina HosmerUniversity Computing CenterUniversity of Massachusetts

Amherst, MA 01003

Page 3: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

C.M.1983/D:2Statistics 'Committee

Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique de la' TemperatureMensuelle Moyenne sur la eSte Continentale Atlantique.

RESUME

Les techniques de s~rie chronologique Box-Jenkins sont utilisees pourajuster un modele ARI~~ aux temperatures d'eau enregistrees sur la cStecontinentale du nord-est des Etats-Unis (Cape Hatteras, NC, to Cape Sable,NS) par mois lunaire durant les annees de 1950 ~ 1980.

!'()lll- t!l'H COIll-d t!~ rati um, allHH.i Id eil l'.~ograp" i <tUCH qll' oecmli qlleH, LI

rcgion üst suht!ivisee en six: La Nouvelle Ecosse, liest du golfe du Maine,l'ouest dll Rolfe du Maine, Ceorge Rank, 1e Moyen Atlnntique ct 1e Culf St~cam.

Cllaque sub region Cl:>t U l:>on tour t!ivil:>ce en zonc a bas-font! (pro[ont!eurd'eau de moins de 150 metres) et en zone profonde (profondeur d'eau de plusde 150 metres). Pour chacune des douze subregions des mod~les ARIMA ont etedeveloppes. Le procede utilise pour developper les modelcs ARIMA de m~meque les estimations des paramitres, la moyenne des carres des residuels etles Q statistiques sont donnes. La performance de l'ajustement des modelesest presentee en tra~ant les graphiques des temperatures observees et projeteessur une echelle de temps.

Des modeles ARlMA sont developpes generalement pour permettre des pre­visions. Dans cet article nous sommes plus interesses a comparer 1a formeet 1e contenu des differents modeles de serie chronologique afin de mieuxcomprendre la dynamique des oceans. Nous avons trouve par exemple UI1 modlUeA~lMAde base qui s'ajuste a toutes les series etudiees mais avec des varia­tions quant aUK param~tres de decalage dans le temps. Cette variation supportedes hypotheses existantes sur 1a connaissance du mouvement d'eau dans ces ~sub regions particulieres.

Page 4: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

1. Introduction

Since the early 1900's, data items such as temperature, salinity,

phytoplankton and fi sh population have been collected from the waters of the

Northeastern Continental Shelf by the scientific cruises of the National

Marine Fisheries Service and its predessors. Bigelow(1927,1933) and Bigelow

nnd Scars(1935) were the first to fully discuss the oceanographic features

of temperature and salinity by month and season for this region. More

recently. atlases of long ter'm temperature means were drawn by Wal ford and

Wickland(1968), Golton and Stoddard(l972). Erneryand Uchupi (1972) have

drawn similar charts for surface salinity. Pawlowski and Wright(1978) have

prepared charts for Spring and Fall sea-surface temperature and salinity for

the years 1972-1977. From a statistical point of view these studies have

done little more than present the observed data in an organized fashion. No

attempt h3S been made to fit statistical models to the data. This paper

presents an approach to the time series statistical models to analyze the

water ternperature data. The advantage of this approach is that it allows an

extensive and complex set' of data to be characterized by a few parameters

without losing the essential oceanographic information in the data. These

models can be used to better understand the ocean dynamies. They can also

be used to compare and contrast various areas, determine short and long tenn

trends wi thin and between areas and forecast future observations.

The data have been collected over time and the Box and Jenkins time

series methods are used to develop statistical models. Section Ir describes

Page 5: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

2

how the 11 time series analyzed in this paper were formed. In Section !II,

we give a techl'1ical description of the Box and Jenkins teehnique. This

seetion eontains the teehnical details of model formulation and readers not

farniliar with the Box and Jenkins methods may want to skip to Seetion IV.

Seetion IV contains a discussion of the fitted models and the conclusions

are given in Section V.

H. Data Description

The ri<lta analyzed in this paper are the largest collection of water

temperature recordings from the Northeastern U.S. Continental She1f (west

of lJt1gitllde 60 degrees Wand north of 30 degrees 20 minutes N), to be

amassed and ana1yzed in one study. It eonsists of over one million water

ternperature recordings colleoted by the National Marine Fisheries

Service(NMFS) cruise ships and other sources beginning in 1908. Using a

bathythermograph, water temperatures were reeorded for 13 standard dp.pths:

0, 10,20,30,40,50,75,100,125,150,200,250,300 and 400 meters for over 200,000

~tations or loeations. Since the rnajority of data was colleeted post Wor1d

W:'lr II and time series anal ysi s requires comp1ete data throughout the year,

we chose to use only the data collected from 1950 through 1980.

From these data we created 11 series which consists of 13 month1y ~ean

water temperatures for each of the 31 years (1950-1980). For geographie as

weU as oceanographie reasons, th~ series were determined by dividing the

Northeastern U.S. Continental Shelf into six major areas: Nova

Page 6: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

3

Seotia(NSOT), Georges Bank(GBNK), Gulf of Maine East(GME), Gulf of Maine

Hest (GMW) , Middle Atlantie(MATL), and Gulf' Stream(GSTR). Refer to Figure 1

for exaet lati tude and longitude loeation of eaeh of the six major areas.

Eaeh major area was further divided into a shallow area (water depth less

than 150 meters) and a deep area (water depth greater than 150 meters); thus

rcsultinU in 12 series. fuwever, due to the faet that in the Gulf Stream

area there is so little water wi th depth less than 150 meters, the Gulf

Stream Shallow series was dropped from the analyses •

The 13 lunar months were determined by dividing the ealendar year into

28 day periods, with the exeeption of the last Month which eontains 29 days

and on leap ycar 30 day~. The monthly means for each year were then

computed by averaging a11 the temperature reeordings within that month for

that year for depths 0,10,20,30,40,50, 15,100,125 and 150 meters for a given

area. \~e have 31 years each with 13 months per year yielding a total of 403

data points per series.

One requirement for the time series techniques used in this paper is

• that the series be complete with no rnissing data. However, none of tha 11

series met this criteria for numerous reasons: bad weather, mechanical

failures,reducert nurn')er of cruises during the Christmas Holidays, or lirnit8d

budget. Each series has at most 10% missing with the exception of Gulf

Maine East, Gulf Maine West Shallow and Deep which have approximately 15%

missing. Before the full analysis W3S performed a forecasting technique was

used to replace each missing value with apredicted value to cornplete each

series. The longest stretch of contiguous years wi th no missing data was

Page 7: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

4

used from each series to fit a model. Values were then forecasted using the

fitted model for the missing data points. The effect of using a time series

model to forecast missing val ues will be to bias the analysi s in favor of

the model. However, for most series less than 10% of the data were missing

so this effect should be negligible.

ur. Time Series Methods

The time series methods of Box and Jenkins were used to fit seasonal

autoregressive, integrated, moving average(ARIMA) models to the 11 water

temperature series. The general form for a p-th order autoregressive , d-th

order iritegrated, q-th order moving average and seasonal P-th order

autoregressive, D-th order integrated, Q-th order moving average model with

s observations per season, also referred to as a (p,d,q)x(P,D,Q) ARIMA

model is

where

and

r (BsP ) S 2s sPP l-rlB -r2B - ••• -rpB

8 (B) 2 PP

1-8I B-82B - .•• -8pB

A (BsQ) s 2s sQQ I-AlB -A2B - ... -AQB

ep (B) 2 qq l-epIB-ep2B - •.• -epqB

d DV Yt Yt-Yt - d Vs Yt Yt-Ytt- SD

BYt Yt - l Bm= Yt - mYt

monthly water temperature

2zero mean white noise with variance 0 a

Page 8: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

5

° The identification and selection of the appropriate time series models

for each of the 11 series was accomplished following the methods of Box and

Jenkins (1970, Chapters 6,9). The generation of the autocorrelations,

parOtial-autocorrelations and parameter estimates was performed by the

BMDP2T(1981) computer program.

Box and Jenkins technique for determing the appropriate time series

•model is a three step procedure: (1) identification- use of the data and any

information on how the series was formed to suggest an appropriate model,

(2) estimation of the parameters using a non-linear least squares algorithm.

(3) diagnostic checking- examination of the fitted model in its relation to

The first step in identification is to determine if the data is

the data to determine model inadequacies and how to improve the fit.

autocorrelations Which have been computed from the data for lags of

we ex amine thestationari ty,forcheckTo

the data displays an affinity to a mean value).

If the data is stationary the computed autocorrelations should

(i .e.

technique.

1.2••••• K•

stationary

Stationarity is a necessary property in order to perform the Box and Jenkins

modeling

• die out gradually as the lags increase. If the data is not stationary, by

differencing the data an dappropriate number of times (V =y - Y )d we cant t-

achieve stationarity. If the data is seasonal, like the water temperature

data. then we will have to consider a seasonal di fferencing (VD= y -y ) ast t-D

weIl. Table I gives the typical sampie autocorrelations for the water

temperature series (y ) for (1) no differencing (y =y ) (2)differenced witht t t

respect to lunar month only (Vd=~ ;y =y ) (3)differenced with respect tot t t-l

Page 9: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

6

year only (VD=~ ;y =y ) (4)differenced with respect to lunar month andt t t-l3

year . (vd=lvD=ly ;y =y +y -y ). From Table I, we can see thet t t-l t-l3 t-l4

autocorrelations for Yt are large and fail to die out. With the simple

difference (Vd=l), the autocorrelations die out butthere remains a high

autocorrelation at seasonal lags. With the simple differencing with respect

~l .to seasonality (V), the autocorrelations are first persistently positive

and then persistently negative. By contrast the differencing with respect

d=l D=lto month and year (V V ) reduces the autocorrelations throughout. Since

this pattern was typical with all the series, they were all differenced

mcnthly as weIl as yearly to obtain stationarity.

Once the appropriate differencing has been decided, then we examine the

autocerrelations and partial-autocorrelations to indicate the possible

chocies of order for p,P,q,Q for autoregressive, seasonal autoregressive and

mcving average, seasonal moving average operators. In general, for a

nonseasonal model, if the autocorrelations tail off to zero after lag p and

the partial-autocorrelations. truncate after lag p, then we have an

truncate after lag q and the partial-autocorrelations tail off after lag q,

autoregressive model of order p. Conversely, if' the autocorrelations

•then we have a moving average model of order q. If both autocorrelations

and partial-autocorrelations tail off, then we have a mixed process. The

autocorrelation and partial-autocorrelation structure for seasonal models is

ccmpletely analagous to that of ncnseasonal models except we only examine

lags S,25 and so forth. That is, if the autocorrelations appear to truncate

after lag s or 2s and the partial- autocorrelations at seasonal lags s,2s,

and 3s appear to tail off towards zero, then a seasonal moving average

operator of order 1 or 2 should be included in the model.

Page 10: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

TABtE I

Autccorrelations for No Di fferencing. Monthly. Seasonaland both Monthly and Seasonal

AUTOCORRELATIONS Vd=O VD=O

1- 12 .56 .37 .15 -.12 -.30 -.43 -.45 -.35 -.18 .04 .28 .42ST. E. ~05 .06 .07 .07 .07 .07 .08 .09 .09 .09 .09 .09

13- 24 .50 .45 .26 .06 -.16 -.36 -.46 -.43 -.33 -.16 .04 .26ST. E. .10 .10 • 11 • 11 • 11 • 11 • 11 .12 .12 .12 .12 .12

25- 36 .43 .46 .41 .27 -.02 -.21 -.38 -.48 -.48 -.38 -.19 .03ST.E. .12 .13 .13 .14 .14 .14 .14 .14 .14 .15 .15 .15

• AUTOCORRELATIONS vd=1 vo=O .

7

1- 12ST.E.

13- 24ST.E.

25- 36ST.E.

-.29 .03 .06 -.11 -.04 -.14 -.13 -.09 -.05 -.02 .11 .07.05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06

.15 .14 .03 .01 -.01 -.13 -.14 -.09 -.07 -.04 -.02 -.06

.06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06

.16 .08 .10 .17 -.11 -.03 -.08 -.10 -.12 -.09 -.04 -.01

.06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .07 .07 .07 .07

AUTOCORRELATIONS f=O iJ=1

1- 12ST. E.

13- 24ST.E.

25- 36ST. E.

.22 .18 .19 .08 .14 .05 -.04 -.08 -.07 -.10 -.06 -.13

.05 .05 .05 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 ~06 .06 .06

-.45 -.06 -.11 -.02 .03 -.06 .01 .09 .08 .05 .02 -.04.06 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07

.03 -.09 -.10 -.02 -.19 -.12 -.06 -.10 -.10 -.12 -.12 -.04

.07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07

AUTOCORRELATIONS Vd= 1 VD= 1

1- 12 -.47 -.04 .08 -.10 .09 0.0 -.03 -.03 .03 -.05 .07 .17ST.E. .05 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06 .06

13- 24ST.E.

25- 36ST. E.

-.46 .28 -.09 .03 .08 -.09 -.01 .06 .01 .01 .01 -.08.06 .07 .07 .07 .07 .07 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08

.12 -.07 -.05 .15 -.14 -.01 .07 -.03 .02 -.02 -.05 .02

.08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08 .08

J

Page 11: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

8

Again examining the autocorrelations in Table I which have been

differenced both monthly and year1y, spikes ceeur at lags 1,13 and the on1y

nonzero autocorrelations are at lags 1,12,13,14. Also the autocorrelations

truncate at lags 13 and 26. The corresponding partial-autocorrelaticns

given in Table II, generally tail off at lags 1,2,3,4 and at lags 13,26.

This suggests a moving average model of order q=1,Q=1 or (0,1,1)x(0,1,n •

Since these autocorrelations are typical of most of the water temperature

series, a moving average of order q=1,Q=1 was first fit to the series. Then

depending on the results of diagnostic checking (to be explained next} ,

various parameters may have been added to improve the fit.

TAsLE Ir

Partial Autocorrelaticn for both Monthly and Seasonal Di fferencing

PARTIAL AUTOCORRELATIONS vd=1 ~=1

1- 12 -.41 -.34 -.15 -.20 -.01ST.E. .05 .05 .05 .05 .05

-.01.05

0.0 -.01 -.04 -.11 -.03.05 .05 .05 .05 .05

.21

.05

13- 24 -.30 -. 14 -.23 -. 11 -.01 -.03 -.10 -.04 -.01 .03 .02 -.03ST.E. .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05

25- 36 .30 -.11 -.09 -.04 -.01 -.11 -.04 -.08 .01 .02 -.03 -.05ST. E. .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05 .05

Page 12: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

The third step, diagnostic checking, and ways to improve the fit, are

performed by examining (1) whether the parameter estimates are significantly

different trom zero (2)the residual mean square error trom the fitted model

(3)the autocorrelations of the residuals (4)portmanteau lack of fit test and

(5)parsimony. The parameter estimates are considered to be significantly

different from zero if

z = estimated parameter < 1.96

•s.e. of parameter

If z is greater than 1.96, then this is an indication that the corresponding

term should be included in the model. However if a z ratio trom a parameter

estimate is less than 1.96, then one.may consider dropping that term from

the. model. The residual mean square error should be as low as possible.

The autocorrelations of the residuals should become close to a white noise

process. All residual autocorrelations should be less than 2 times their

standard error. In fact, recognizable patterns in the estimated residual

autocorrelation could suggest an appropriate modification in the model. The

portmllnteau lack of fit test says for K autocorrelations, if the fitted

model is appropriate,

K -ZQ = nE r where r is residual autocorrelation at lag k

k-l k

is approximately di stributed as Chi-Square Cl) wi th K-p-q-P-Q degrees of

freedom where n=N-d-D. If the model is inadequate then Q will be inflated.

Therefore, the test of hypothesis of model adequacy may be made by referring

an observed value of Q. to table of percentage points of XZ • In general we

prefer to have as few estimated parameters as possible in the final model.

In other words. we wish to have a parsimonious model.

J

Page 13: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

10

. Generally , for each water temperature series, the model wi th the

smallest value of Q with no significant residual autocorrelations was chosen

for the final model. Ir there were 2 or more models for the same series

with small and approximately equal values of Q, the one withthe smallest

residual mean square error was chosen. If these were about the same, the

most parsimonious model was chosen.

IV. Discussion ofthe Fitted Models

Of the 11 water temperature series, 6 were fitted with models which

yielded values of Q that had probablities of occurrence greater than .50,

two series had probabilities greater than .25 and the remaining three series.

had probabilites greater than .10. Since none of these models yielded Q

values with probabilites which were significant (p-value less than .05), the

models presented in Table 111 represent the data quite welle A further

indicaticn of the adequacy of the fitted model was to plot the forecasted

values and the' observed values for the last 4 years of data. The series

Gulf Haine West Shallow and Middle Atlantic Shallow, were chosen to be

plotted since their respective models have generated Q values which have the

highest and lowest associated probabilities. As we can see from the plots

in Figure 2, we have a close likeness between observed and forecasted.

All the fitted models are -parsimonious. At most 4 parameters have been

estimated. Six cf the series: NSOTD, GMES, GMED, GMWD, GBNKD, and GSTRD are

fit with the same model, a simple moving average of order 1 and 13. We also

Page 14: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

11

note from Table III that the 2 parameter estimates for the 6 series are very

similar. This seems a reasonable result since these 6 series are all the

deep water areas with the exception of GMES and would therefore have less

coastal and bottom effect complicating the model. Since GMES is directly

influenced by the inflow from the very deep waters of the Northeast Channel,

we can understand why this would have a model similar to the other deep

water areas. The only deep series that was not fit with a simple moving

average of order 1 and 13 is MATLD. The MATLD area i srenowned for i ts deep

water cold pockets which have a tremendous effect on the surrounding water

~ temperatures thus requiring a more complicated model.

In order to relate to a simple moving average model of order 1 and 13

where the data has been differenced monthly and yearly, we give the

prediction equation:

In other words, i f we wi sh to predict the monthlyI

mean temperature for

•September 83, we would take the temperature for August 83 plus the

difference in temperature between September 82 and August 82,plus parameter

estimates times residual for August 83 minus the difference in residual

between September 82 and August 82. It simply states for the deep water

areas, there is both a monthly and seasonal relationship for past

observations as weIl as past residuals. Although this is not a new

discovery, we have been able to statistically portray the massive amounts of

data for these areas into a very simple statistical model which has

unlimited potential for future uses.

Page 15: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

12

The remaining 5 series N30TS. GMWS. GBNKS, MATLS. and MATLD cou1d not

l)e fit with just the simple moving average of order 1 and 13 but required

other terms as well. Although. these additional terms are smal1er in size

th~n the terms of order 1 and 13, they are statistically signlficant. Since

these waters are primari1y coasta1 waters with the exception of

HATLD(reasons explained previously), we wou1d expect a more cornplex model to

be necessary since fresh water inflow, tides and land temperatures are

having rrJOre impact on the water temperatures. For exarnple, GHHS and HATLS

both required a moving average parameter of order 5 as weIl as and 13.

Thus not on1y is the previous months residual important but the previous 5

months residual as w~ll. This 5 month lag parameter cou1d represent the

re1atlol1s1üp between the winter water temperatures and the su'mner water

temperatures. In other words. the co1der the waters in the winter, the

colder the waters in the summer and vice versa. Also G~~S 1s the on1y

series that required an autoregressive term as wel1 as rnoving average terms.

This merlns thCit the model requires not only parameter estimates times past

residual but a parameter estimate times past observations, making the past

observations even more important. From Table III, we see we have similar

deviations for GBNKS, MATLS and MATLD series. Whether these slight

deviations, a1though statistica1ly significant, are oceanographica11y

significant must be investigated further.

V. Conclusion

Box and Jenkins time series mode1ing techniques have been app1ied to 11

series created from w~ter temperature recordings from the Northeastern

Continental Shelf. Six of the series were fit with a very simple Box and

Page 16: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

13

Jenkins model, a moving average of order 1 and 13. The other 5 series were

fit with the same model and additional lag parameters depending upon the

series. How these additional parameters relate to the basic understanding

of water movement in each of the respective series remains to be seen.

However, i t does appear that the Box and Jenkins models are able to

distinguish a relatively stable body of water from a more complex body of

water. All the shallow series which are primarily coastal waters, thus

being more affected by fresh water inflow, tides and land currents required

the more complicated Box and Jenkins model •

It seems reasonable from the way each of the series was created that

only general findings and broad conclusions could be made from this

exercise. The data used to create each of the series involved averaging

together data values from hundreds of square miles and from surface

temperatures down to 150 meters. Consequently, we have averaged out minor

disturbances and site specific phenomenon. In conclusion, it appears that

the Box and Jenkins time series technique is a reasonable approach to model

the water temperature data. However, in order to obtain more specific

information about water movement, we need to create the series for much

smaller areas and for several depth zones.

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge Dr. Robert Edwards (Northeast Fisheries, U.S.)

who motivated this research. He not only obtained the data and decided how

the series should be formulated but also supplied the necessary oceanograph­

ic background to perform the analysis.

I wou1d also 1ike to acknow1edge the continuing assistance Bob Gonter

has given to this project in writing programs to manipulate the data.

Page 17: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

TABLE III

"Best" Fitting ARIMA Models for Time Series of Water Temperaturefor Northeastern Continental Shelf, 1950-1980

P- Resid. MA AR

Model Q- value Mean COEF's COEF's

Series (p.d.g)x(P .P.Q) ~ .LU Square Lag~ Lag Z Lag .J Lag~ Lag 2 Lag ~ Lag II Lag ~

NSOTD (0,1,1) (0,1,1) 22 >.50 8.29 .7874 .7782

GMES (0,1,1) (0,1,1) 21 >.50 1.13 .7884 .7160

GMEP (0,1,1) (0,1,1) 21 >.50 1.07 .7430 .7984

GMWD (0,1,1) (0,1,1) 17 >.75 .89 .8789 .8215

GBNKD (0,1,1) (0,1,1 ) 23 >.50 4.31 .7540 .8384

GSTRD (0,1,1) (0,1,1) 27 >.25 4.61 .7545 .7736

NSOTS (0,1,2) (0,1,1) 30 >.10 1.36 .4875 .1872 .7577

GMWS (1,1,2) (0,1,1) 16 >.75 1.32 .8961 .1664 .9601 .2228

GBNKS (0,1,2) (0,1,1) 30 >.10 2.33 .7196 .1028 .7165

MATLS (0,1,3) (0,1,1) 31 >.10 3.31 .6011 .1480 -.1769 .5809

MATLD (0,1,3) (0,1,1) 23 >.25 2.66 .6595 .1577 .1554 .7680

(1) Pegrees of freedom -27-p-q-P-Q

......~

Page 18: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

LlO ";

11 '.-

b

\'Z.

1

Col .tob

FIGURE 1

Map Locating the 6 Major Areas11. '1\

'II-~=r-~---D-I-+--"'~~-I---J--I-4--t--+--II~~.

.f•..- • • ..• • • ··~ • • ..• _·······..-··..·-· - - - - _-- ,....................... ...-co -:r -'Ir ..• :~ #, -. " ,'. ...,".......,

'.",

"

"

.1',

'I'

!

~. ----------

Page 19: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

FORECASTED AND OBSERVED FOR GMWS

'" 20.0r-l

W -1B.00

~C> 16.0I-ZW0 14.0

Z

W 12.0

A0:::::>~ 10.0

.0::W0.. 8.02wI-

0::6.0

W

~ 4.03:

1977I

1978I

1979I

1980

~ FORECASTED--E'r- OBSERVED

JAN. 1977 - DEC. 1980

FIGURE 2a

Page 20: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

FORECASTED AND OBSERVED FOR MATLS

"r-l20.0 I

I

W 18.01 ~ FORECASTED0

'fl .-0-- OBSERVED4:Cl:: ' .

<p~'j, .

L? 16.0 G~ "i=

, , , lI>, , , ,Z

, ,~' I, , , I

W,

~ : "tb \,0 14.0

,~

I,

~, I

I I,, , ,

Z,

I,

• , \I • , •

l, , ,

12.0 , , I

W ~, I

Cl:: Q,

I

:::>, ,• I

t-, ,

10.0 , ,« • ,I

Cl:: •,,

W I • I. I ,0... \ I ~

,2 B.O

V• tp,

W • ,•i-I

~ ,6.0 I 'oJ!>

Cl:: II

LU 1: ·~, ,'0

4.0 ' ,3 "0

I

2.0 -1 j I I1977 1978 1979 1980

JAN. 1977 OEC. 1980

FIGURE 2b

e el ~~~~.:.=..:..._=_~~~~~~~~~~__~~~~

Page 21: Time Series Models of Mean Monthly Temperature University … Doccuments/1983/D/1983_D2.pdf · 2014-01-29 · C.M.1983/D:2 Statistics 'Committee Des Mod~les type Serie Chronologique

18

References or Literature Cited

Bige1ow, H. B. 1927. Physica1 Oceanography of the Gu1f of Maine. Bu11.U. S. Bur. Fish 40(2):511-1027.

Bige1ow, H. B. 1933. Studies of the Waters on the Continental Shelf,Cape Cod to Chesapeake Bay. I. The cyc1e of temperature. Pap. Phys.Oceanogr. and Met. 4(1). 135 pp.

Bige1ow, H. B., ·and M. Sears. 1935. Studies of the Waters on the Con­tinental Shelf, Cape Cod to Chesapeake Bay. 11. Pap. Phys.Oceanogr. and Met. 94 pp.

Box, G. and Jenkins, G. 1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting andContro1, Ho1den-Day, San Francisco.

Colton, J. B., and R. R. Stoddard. 1972. Average Monthly Seawater Tem­peratures, Nova Scotia to Lang Is1and, 1940-1959. Amer. Geogr.Soc. Sero Atlas Mar. Envir. Folio 21. 2pp.

McCleary, R. and Hay, R. 1980. Applied Time Series Analysis for theSocial Science, Sage Publications, Beverly Hi1ls.

Nelson, C., 1973. Applied Time Series Analysis for Managerial Fore­casting, Holden-Day, San Francisco.

O'Donovan, T. M. 1983. Short Term Forecasting, An Introduction to theBox-Jenkins Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Pawlowski, R. J. and Wright, W. R. 1978. Spring and Fall Sea-SurfaceTemperature and Salinity on the Northeastern Continental Shelf;Cape Hatteras to Cape·Sab1e, 1972-1978.

Walford, L. A. , and R. I. Wick1and. 1968. Monthly Sea TemperatureStructure from the Florida Keys to Cape Cod.Amer. Geogr. Soc.Sero Atlas Mar. Envir. Folio 15. 2pp.


Recommended