18
To:
Name: Date: 06/17/20
Title:
Company: Cert. Level: Level 3
Address: Cert. No.:
City: Cert. Date:
State:
Zip:
Phone: Cell:
Fax: e-mail:
For: Project:
County:
Routes:
Material to be produced at: Plant:
Location:
Is this a New Job Mix Formula:
Yes x No
Name: Name:
Cert. Level: Location:
Cert. No.: Initial Cert. Date:
Cert. Date: Last ReCert. Date:
Last ReCert.:
Old Design: Yes No x
1) This design has been previously approved as JMF #
Calibration #
2) This design has not been approved, but was submitted
QC program submitted for this year? Yes X No
GB2004
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
RAP Management
Columbus, OH
4647 East 5th Ave.
-
Ohio
Columbus
613-313-5048
most recently for project #
43219
Level 2 individual Other Design Individual
Cert. No.:
**Reminder** A copy of this design must be submitted to the DET
for approval on Project #
RAP Management
4647 E Fifth Ave
Last ReCert.:
Name:
Cert. Level:
Cert. Date:
Ryan Smith
2
John Gentil
Quality Control Manager
Submitted by
RAP Mangement LLC
Level 2 laboratory
Asphalt Materials Section
Ohio Department Of Transportation
Columbus, Ohio 43223-1928
1600 West Broad Street
Office of Materials Management
Testing Laboratory
Producer Mix Type
Project Usage; (1= Surface; 2= Interm.)
Spec 441 Year 2020 Traffic Designation:
( "1" if Heavy ; "2" if Light )
Sieve % Pass Low High
2" (50.8) 100 100 100
1-1/2" (38.1) 100 100 100
1" (25.4) 100 100 100
3/4" (19) 100 100 100
1/2" (12.7) 100 100 100
3/8" (9.5) 94 90 100
#4 (4.75) 54 45 57
#8 (2.36) 33 30 45
#16 (1.18) 24 17 35
#30 (0.6) 17 12 25 0.9 OK
#50 (0.3) 11 5 18 -1 OK
#100 (0.15) 7 2 10 88.2 OK
#200 (0.075) 5.0
NOTES:
% Size ODOT Gsb
40 OH8 2.593
% Size ODOT Gsb
% % AC Gse
60 5.06 2.676
*If RAP taken from State route, enter State route and project.
If other recycled material, or RAP taken from non-State route, enter size, type Blend Gsb = 2.642
and source/location of fine and coarse aggregate, and source of information.
(e) (m)
GB2004
Mixing Temperature
Max. Theoretical @ Optimum
PG Grade by Proposal
% Virgin Binder
Virgin Binder Grade
Binder Supplier
Polymer Type (SBR -or- SBS)
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
AT OPTIMUM AC CONTENT:
For Official Use Only
Limestone
Type Producer/Location Code
% Binder Content @ Opt. Air Voids
Rap 55/45
VMA
Calibration #JMF
Resubmit Rc'd: UnitWtAir Voids
Stability 2 Points Above and Below Opt.?
Date Approved
Flow Opt. At Median Air Voids?
RAP Management
Maximum Theo.
ODOT SPEC. BAND
Original Rc'd:
Coarse aggregate
Shelly-Columbus, OH
PG 64-22
2.7
315 F
290 F
Loaded Wheel Test Results
Type I
Surface
Medium
% Binder Content @ Max. Stability
Line Item Reference Number(s)
Composition
Limestone
*RAP
50 - 30 Ratio
Optimum % Asphalt Content=5.7 % TOTAL BINDER(2.7 % Virgin BINDER GRADE PG 64-
22+ 2.9 % RAP AC) Plus Cargill Anova 1815 rejuv. @ 0.10% (wt. of mix)
2.430
Producer/Location Code
Fine aggregate
TSR Ratio
Compaction Temperature
F/A Ratio
PG 58-28
% Binder Content @ Max. Unit Weight
Type
RAP
Source
4502-01
Type
5.7
DATE : 6/15/2020 Project : 0 Mix Type: JMF# : 0
Limestone 0 0 0 0 0 RAP
OH8 0 0 0 0 0
% USED % USED % USED % USED % USED % USED % USED40.0 60.0 ACCUM. TARGET
% % Medium - Traffic
Sieve % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING % PASSING PASS. PASS.
2" (50.8)100.0 100.0 100.0 100
100-
100
1-1/2" (38.1)100.0 100.0 100.0 100
100-
100
1" (25.4)100.0 100.0 100.0 100
100-
100
3/4" (19)100.0 100.0 100.0 100
100-
100
1/2" (12.7)100.0 100.0 100.0 100
100-
100
3/8" (9.5)89.0 97.0 93.8 94
90-
100
#4 (4.75)22.0 75.5 54.1 54
45-
57
#8 (2.36)6.0 51.0 33.0 33
30-
45
#16 (1.18)3.0 38.3 24.2 24
17-
35
#30 (0.6)2.0 26.3 16.6 17
12-
25
#50 (0.3)2.0 17.0 11.0 11
5-
18
#100 (0.15)1.0 10.8 6.9 7
2-
10
#200 (0.075)1.1 7.6 5.0 5.0 -
GB2004
DESIGN LIMITS
Type I
Surface
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
AGGREGATE BLEND SHEET
0 0
Shelly
Company
CLS
0 Rap 55/45
PROJECT : 0 ANALYSIS DATE : 17-Mar-20
RAP SOURCE : Rap 55/45 MIX TYPE : Type I
METRIC U.S. SAMPLE #1 SAMPLE #2 SAMPLE #4 COMBINED
SIEVE SIEVE % P % P % P COMPOSITION
50.8 2" 100 100 100 100.0
38.1 1 1/2" 100 100 100 100.0
25.4 1" 100 100 100 100.0
19 3/4" 100 100 100 100.0
12.5 1/2" 100 100 100 100.0
9.5 3/8" 96 96 97 97.0
4.75 #4 75 76 76 75.5
2.36 #8 50 51 52 51.0
1.18 #16 38 36 40 38.3
0.6 #30 27 24 27 26.3
0.3 #50 19 15 17 17.0
0.15 #100 12 10 11 10.8
0.07 #200 8.7 7.2 8.1 7.55
BITUMEN 5.08 5.01 5.1 5.06
COMPOSITION :
GB2004
51
39
27
17
10
6.2
5.06
Limestone
COMMENTS :
100
100
100
100
99
75
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
RAP ANALYSIS
Columbus, OH
SAMPLE #3
% P
100
JMF # : 0
Type I Surface Medium DATE : 6/17/2020
GB2004
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
SPECIFICATION :
PROJECT ID : 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
PE
RC
EN
T P
AS
SIN
G
SIEVE SIZES
0.45 POWER GRADATION CHART
JMF BLEND
LOWER SPEC. LIMIT
UPPER SPEC. LIMIT
200 100 50 30 16 #8 #4 3/8"
1/2" 3/4"1" 1 1/2" 2"
Optimum PG Content = 5.7 % (x)
Sieve % Passing
2" 100 % RAP used in Blend = 60 % (y)
1 1/2" 100
1" 100 Avg. AC% in RAP = 5.06 % (z)
3/4" 100
1/2" 100
3/8" 97 Calculate Blending Index = (x-(z*(y/100)))/x
#4 76
#8 51 Calculate Blending Index = 46.7
#16 38
#30 26
#50 17
#100 11 Based on above chart it will be necessary to use : PG 58-28
#200 7.6
RAP source (Proj. where Recycled matl. was originally placed) :
Stockpile location : Technician :
RAP Tested at : No. of Samples : 4
% Binder content in RAP : 5.08 5.01 5.06 5.1 RAP Test date : 03/17/20
RAP Binder Sp. Gr. = 1.043 RAP Gse = 2.676 RAP Binder Visc. (pas-sec) = 12,600
GB2004
RAP Management-Columbus
RAP Management-Columbus
Josh Baldwin
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
Use P
G 5
8-2
8U
se P
G 6
4-2
2 -
or-
64-2
8
RAP Gradation
Rap 55/45
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
BIN
DE
R V
ISC
OS
ITY
'
BLENDING INDEX
RAP BLENDING
Pb BINDER CONTENT % 5.5 5.5
A DRY WT. OF MIX Gms 1555.6 1557.3
A* SSD DRY WT. OF MIX 1556.7 1558.3
B CONT. & MIX & WATER 2397.7 2399.5
C CONT. & WATER (CONST) 1479.8 1479.8
D MIX WT. WATER (B-C) 917.9 919.7
E A-D (IF SSD THEN A*-D) 638.8 638.6 AVG F Gse= 2.643
F A/E 2.435 2.439 2.437
Pmm TOTAL MIXTURE % 100 100 100 100 100 100
Ps AGG CONTENT % 95.0 94.5 94.0 93.5 0.0 0.0
Pb BINDER CONTENT % 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 0.0 0.0
Gb APP. SP. GR. Binder (CONST) 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.041 1.041
Gse EFF. SP. GR. AGG. (CONST) 2.643 2.643 2.643 2.643 2.643 2.643
G (Ps/Gse) 35.941 35.752 35.563 35.374 0.000 0.000
H (Pb/Gb) 4.803 5.283 5.764 6.244 0.000 0.000
I (G+H) 40.745 41.036 41.327 41.618 0.000 0.000
Gmm (Pmm/I) Max Sp Gr 2.454 2.437 2.420 2.403 0.000 0.000
Pb BINDER CONTENT % 5.1 5.1 Avg = 5.06
A DRY WT. OF MIX Gms 1501.6 1503.6
A* SSD DRY WT. OF MIX 1502.5 1504.7
B CONT. & MIX & WATER 2377.4 2377.9 1.043
C CONT. & WATER (CONST) 1480.0 1480.0
D MIX WT. WATER (B-C) 897.4 897.9 Visc. of RAP Binder = 12,600
E (A-D); IF SSD THEN (A*-D) 605.1 606.8F A/E 2.482 2.478 Avg = 2.480
2.676
Coarse Agg % Of Blend Size Dry Blk SG
Shelly-Columbus, OH 40 OH8 2.593
0 0 0 1.000
0 0 0 1.000Fine Aggregate
0 0 0 1.000
0 0 0 1.000
0 0 0 1.000
Other
RAP (Gse) 60 2.676
CALCULATE Gsb: Gsb = Ps/((CA%/Gca)+(FA%/Gfa)+(RAP%/GseRAP)) = 2.642
Ps AGG. CONTENT % 95.0 94.5 94.0 93.5 0.0
Gsb BULK SP GR AGG (CONST) 2.642 2.642 2.642 2.642 2.642
Gmb AVG. BULK SP GR MIX 2.326 2.341 2.362 2.381
J (Gmb/Gsb)*Ps 83.6 83.7 84.0 84.3 #VALUE!
VMA (100 - J) 16.4 16.3 16.0 15.7 #VALUE!GB2004
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
** RICE DETERMINATION OF MAX SPECIFIC GRAVITY **
PART 1
*Determine RAP Gravity By Rice
Method; Show Part 1 Below for
test run on RAP
CALCULATE Gse =
(PMM-Pb)/((Pmm/F)-(Pb/Gb))
PART 1 (RAP)
PART 2
** VMA CALCULATIONS **
CALCULATE Gse: Gse = (Pmm-Pb)/((Pmm/F)-(Pb/Gb)) =
RAP Binder Spec. Gr. =
JMF #Mix
Type :Type I Medium
Design
Blows:50 290 F
A B C D R E F G H I J K L M N O P Q
A 5.0 2.6 1208.9 1211.1 691.1 520.0 2.325 3,159 3,159 10.3
B 5.0 2.6 1207.5 1210.1 691.3 518.8 2.327 3,155 3,155 10.7
C 5.0 2.6 1207.5 1210.5 691.0 519.5 2.324 3,165 3,165 11.0
2.326 2.454 11.2 5.2 68.0 16.4 145.1 2324 3,160 10.7
A 5.5 2.6 1209.3 1211.6 694.4 517.2 2.338 2,956 2,956 12.3
B 5.5 2.6 1207.3 1209.1 693.8 515.3 2.343 3,021 3,021 12.2
C 5.5 2.6 1208.2 1209.9 693.7 516.2 2.341 3,158 3,158 11.4
2.341 2.437 12.4 4.0 75.7 16.3 146.1 2339 3,045 11.9
A 6.0 2.6 1203.1 1204.0 695.0 509.0 2.364 2,908 2,908 13.2
B 6.0 2.6 1203.0 1204.0 694.7 509.3 2.362 2,915 2,915 13.2
C 6.0 2.6 1206.2 1207.4 696.5 510.9 2.361 2,923 2,923 13.8
2.362 2.420 13.6 2.4 85.1 16.0 147.4 2361 2,915 13.4
A 6.5 2.6 1193.6 1194.2 693.2 501.0 2.382 2,755 2,865 16.8
B 6.5 2.6 1202.8 1203.6 698.7 504.9 2.382 2,750 2,860 17.1
C 6.5 2.6 1199.4 1200.3 696.0 504.3 2.378 2,749 2,859 17.0
2.381 2.403 14.9 0.9 94.2 15.7 148.6 2380 2,861 17.0
A 0.0
B 0.0 0.0
C 0.0
A
B
C
GB2004
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN DATA
%
Binder
by
Volume
(L-J)/L Gx62.4 100-
100(G/H)(BxG)/ Gb
In Water
Compaction
Temperature
Mx16.02
VMA
Unit Wt
kg/m3
Voids (Percent)Unit Wt
lb/ft3Gmm
0
Total
MixFilledIn Air SSD
Sample
No.
Binder
%
Thick-
ness
inches
Weight (g)
Average of 5.5% Binder Specimens
Average of 6.0% Binder Specimens
Average of 6.5% Binder Specimens
Flow
0.01"
OxCorr.
Stability
ChartConverte
d
Average of 5.0% Binder Specimens
Vol.
Cc
(R-E) (D/F)
Gmb
GB2004
MARSHALL DESIGN GRAPHS
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8
% A
IR V
OID
S
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8% V
MA
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
144.0
145.0
146.0
147.0
148.0
149.0
150.0
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8
UN
IT W
EIG
HT
, (P
CF
)
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
9.010.011.012.013.014.015.016.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.0
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8
FL
OW
(0
.01
")
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8
ST
AB
ILIT
Y
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
50
60
70
80
90
100
4.8 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8
% V
OID
S F
ILL
ED
% BINDER BY WEIGHT OF MIX
PROJECT:
SAMPLE ID
DIAMETER (mm.) 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0 150.0
THICKNESS (mm.) 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0
DRY WT IN AIR (gm.) 2370.7 2390.6 2375.0 2361.5 2362.1 2368.3
SSD WEIGHT (gm.) 2381.6 2417.5 2383.0 2378.5 2382.0 2389.8
WT IN WATER (gm.) 1334.8 1363.5 1334.9 1337.3 1339.5 1344.7
VOLUME (cc.) 1046.8 1054.0 1048.1 1041.2 1042.5 1045.1
BULK SP GR 2.265 2.268 2.266 2.268 2.266 2.266
MAX SP GR 2.430 2.430 2.430 2.430 2.430 2.430
% AIR VOIDS 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.7
VOL AIR VOIDS (cc.) 71.2 70.2 70.8 69.4 70.5 70.5
LOAD (lb.) 2,100 2,200 2,050
SSD WEIGHT (gm.) 2413.4 2440.2 2417.5
WT IN WATER (gm.) 1348.0 1370.3 1353.0
VOLUME (cc.) 1065.4 1069.9 1064.5
VOL ABS WATER (cc.) 42.7 49.6 42.5
% SATURATION 59.9 70.6 60.1
% SWELL 1.78 1.51 1.56
THICKNESS (mm.) 62.0 62.0 62.0
SSD WEIGHT (gm.) 2417.4 2447.3 2423.1
WT IN WATER (gm.) 1353.0 1377.1 1359.5
VOLUME (cc.) 1064.4 1070.2 1063.6
VOL ABS WATER (cc.) 46.7 56.7 48.1
% SATURATION 65.6 80.7 68.0
% SWELL 1.68 1.54 1.48
LOAD (lb.) 1,900 1,850 1,850 AVG.
DRY STRENGTH (psi) AVG. 92.8 97.2 90.5 93.5
WET STRENGTH (psi) 83.9 81.7 81.7 82.45
TSR (%) 88.2
VISUAL STRIPPING:
GB2004
Medium
None
SATURATED
CONDITIONED
MARSHALL MIX DESIGN
TENSILE STRENGTH RATIO (TSR)
MATERIAL TYPE:
CONDITIONED SAMPLES CONTROL SAMPLES
Type I0
Performance Test Data
Lab Mix Plant Mix Specification
Continuous Binder Grading PG 77.3-24.1 PG 76.5-24.8 ≥ PG 64-22
IDEAL CT 171.8 168.2 > 50
Hamburg 3.4mm 4.8mm < 12.5mm
JMF Binder Composition
Virgin Binder 2.70%
RAP Binder 2.90%
Anova 1815 0.10%
Total Binder 5.70%
Continuous Binder Grading
The sample was subjected to the following testing: • % Asphalt Content (%AC) by Extraction, in accordance with AASHTO T164. • Wet sieve analysis of the extracted aggregate, in accordance with AASHTO T30. • Recovery of the extracted asphalt binder, in accordance with ASTM D5444. • Determination of the continuous grading of the extracted, recovered
asphalt binder. The aging protocol as recommended in the Appendix
Section of AASHTO M323 was followed. The binder testing performed
was as follows:
o DSR testing, in accordance with AASHTO T315. o PAV aging in accordance with AASHTO R28. o Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) testing, in accordance with AASHTO
T313. o Determination of the binder continuous grading, in accordance with ASTM
D7643. The results are as follows:
Continuous Binder Grading
LAB DESIGN MIX
Continuous Binder Grading: PG 77.3-24.1
Continuous Binder Grading
Plant Produced MIX
Continuous Binder Grading: PG 76.6-24.8
IDEAL-CT LAB PRODUCED MIX
CT Index: 171.8
ICT Test Report
Lab Mix
Type-1 60%
COC20045
Test 1-1 Test 2-1 Test 3-1
TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 °F
DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 mm
THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 mm
WORK FRACTURE 61.3 WORK FRACTURE 100.2 WORK FRACTURE 79.32 Joules
CT INDEX 171.94 CT INDEX 147.04 CT INDEX 181.39
ERRORS None ERRORS None ERRORS None
Test 4-1 Test 5-1 Test CT AVG
TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 °F
DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 mm
THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 mm
WORK FRACTURE 33.04 WORK FRACTURE 70.89 WORK FRACTURE 89.36 Joules
CT INDEX 164.58 CT INDEX 193.81 CT INDEX 171.8
ERRORS None ERRORS None ERRORS None
564
584
602
622
642
662
680
699
719
739
759
778
796
817
835
858
878
896
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1
25
49 73 97
12
1
14
5
16
9
19
3
21
7
24
1
26
5
28
9
31
3
33
7
36
1
38
5
40
9
43
3
45
7
48
1
50
5
52
9
55
3
57
7
60
1
62
5
64
9
67
3
69
7
72
1
74
5
76
9
79
3
Lab Mix ICT
CT#1 CT#2 CT#3 CT#4 CT#5 CT AVG
IDEAL-CT PLANT PRODUCED MIX
CT Index: 168.2
ICT Test Report
COC#1 2020
Type-1 60%
COC20045
Test 1-1 Test 2-1 Test 3-1
TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 °F
DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 mm
THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 mm
WORK FRACTURE 68.3 WORK FRACTURE 65.5 WORK FRACTURE 70.02 Joules
CT INDEX 165.3 CT INDEX 163.2 CT INDEX 177.98
ERRORS None ERRORS None ERRORS None
Test 4-1 Test 5-1 Test 6-1
TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 TEMPERATURE 77 °F
DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 DIAMETER 150 mm
THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 THICKNESS 62 mm
WORK FRACTURE 71.6 WORK FRACTURE 70.4 WORK FRACTURE 67.2 Joules
CT INDEX 171.1 CT INDEX 168.3 CT INDEX 163.1
ERRORS None ERRORS None ERRORS None
Test CT AVG
TEMPERATURE 77 °F
DIAMETER 150 mm
THICKNESS 68.8 mm
WORK FRACTURE 68.7 Joules
CT INDEX 168.2
ERRORS None
833
859
880
900
922
942
964
983
1006
1027
1045
1063
1083
1103
1122
1139
1157
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
1
25 49 73 97
121
145
169
193
21
7
24
1
26
5
28
9
31
3
337
361
385
409
433
457
481
50
5
52
9
55
3
57
7
60
1
625
649
673
697
721
745
769
79
3
Average ICT
Test 1-1 Test 2-2 Test 3-1 Test 4-1 Test 5-1 Test 6-1 CT AVG
Hamburg Wheel-Track Test - AASHTO T-324
LAB DESIGN MIX
10,000 Cycles Rut Dept: 4.1mm
Hamburg Wheel-Track Test - AASHTO T-324
PLANT PRODUCED MIX
10,000 Cycles Rut Dept: 4.8mm
