Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tracey-kennedy |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Today’s Presenter
Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D.
Big Ideas in RTI Success
2010 RTI Virtual Conference
Sponsored by Pearson
July 26-30
Big Ideas in RTI Success
Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D.National-Louis University
3
More Information, Including Readings and Handouts Can be Found At...
http://markshinn.orgGo to Icon for Downloads for Professionals
Go to Folder entitled: Presentations and Handouts
Go to Folder entitled: Pearson Virtual RTI 2010
3
Sponsored by
4
• Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Serves as a Consultant for AIMSweb, which provides CBM assessment materials and organizes and report the information from 3 tiers, including RTI.
• Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Serves as a Consultant for Vmath, a remedial mathematics intervention from Voyager.
• Mark R. Shinn, Ph.D. Serves as a Consultant for Glencoe Publishing for their Jamestown Reading Navigator (JRN) product.
Disclosure
4
Sponsored by
5
Some People Think That RTI is An Evil Plot
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
5
Sponsored by
6
Why? RTI Myths
• RTI is an Just an Eligibility Process to Identify Students with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD)
• RTI is Just a Different Way to Identify the Same Students and Serve Them the Same Way
• RTI is Another Wait to Fail Approach with the Same Old Hooping Jumping for Teachers and Families and MORE WORK!
• We Can Improve Achievement Significantly If We Ask Teachers to “Invent” Their Own Interventions and Deliver Them is Short Daily Time Periods (e.g., 5-10 minutes), All With MORE MEETINGS
6
Sponsored by
7
RTI “Facts”
• RTI IS an SLD Eligibility Process BUT It Really is Building Coordinated, Multi-Tiered Early Intervening Services, Part of an Organized Effort to Provide All Students with
• High Quality Instruction Using Scientifically Based Practices for Prevention, And
• Early, Appropriately Intense Intervention for Those Who Need It
• Students Get The Services They Need As Soon As They Need Them-No Hoop Jumping
• The Goal is to Select and Use “Block Buster” PROGRAMS (Interventions) Using Powerful Intervention Packages That Are Scientifically Based
8
Where Do We Begin? Year 1 Blueprint
• Engage in Systematic Self Study, Starting with a DISTRICT Leadership Team, Then the Staff Development Plan
• Make Your Big Ideas Explicit!
• Figure Out What GOES!
• Build a Scientific and Coordinated Data System for (Universal) Screening and Progress Monitoring
• Figure Out How You’re Going to Build and Staff Organized Early Intervening Services (Tier 2)
• Know What the Priorities Are for Years 2-4
9
Build Your Foundation withSelf Study
Part A Teams and Teaming: Describe your existing Systems of
Supports, including Teams, and Team and Individual Professional
Roles and Functions
Part B Data Systems: Describe your existing Progress Monitoring
and Universal Screening Systems: Are they scientifically based?
•Part C Interventions: Describe your existing Academic and Behavior
Tools (Interventions): Are they scientifically based?
•Part D Your SLD Entitlement ProcessIdentify Assessment
Instructional Tools and Practices That Are NOT scientifically based
for Abandonment
9
Sponsored by
10
“BIG” RTI--An Entitlement Process for Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD)
“little” rti--A school improvement model designed to employ scientifically based instructional and behavioral interventions aligned with students’ needs, preventatively. and as early as possible
Big Idea #1: RTI is More Than SLD Entitlement
Gresham, F., Reschly, D., & Shinn, M. R. (2010). RTI as a driving force in educational improvement: Historical legal, research, and practice perspectives. In M. R. Shinn & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model, including RTI. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Walker, H. M., & Shinn, M. R. (2010). Systemic, evidence-based approaches for promoting positive student outcomes within an RTI framework: Moving from efficacy to effectiveness. In M. R. Shinn & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems in a three-tier model, including RTI. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
10
Sponsored by
11
Students Get the Services They Need...
As Soon As They Need Them!
Big Idea #2What’s In It For Students and
Families?
11
Sponsored by
12
No Failing in Tier 1 Before You Get Tier 2No Failing in Tier 2 Before
You Get Tier 3
13
Big Idea #3 Time to Revise the Model
Batsche, G. M., Elliott, J., Graden, J., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special
Education, Inc. 13
14
If We Don’t...The “Old Way” of Doing RTI
Find the Kid (1 at a Time)
Who?
Figure Out What to Do for the Kid
(1 at a Time)
What?
14
Sponsored by
15
The Result?
15
• Tiers Will Be a Stopping Place Until the Next Tier
• More Attention Will Be Directed Toward Moving the Student than Building and Delivering Research-Based, Intensive Interventions
• What the Student HAS Will Remain More Important that What We Are Doing About It
16
A Better Way of Thinking About 3 Tiers
CORE Meets the Needs of
MostA Cohesive System DESIGNED with All Students in Mind
16
Some Still Need MOST
Some Still Need MORE
17
“New Way”: Problem Solve for Groups!
THEN Find the Kid(s) Thru
Triage
Who?
Find the PROGRAM
(What GROUPS of Kids Need)
What?
17
18
No Wimpy Interventions
• Intervene EARLY and POWERFULLY
• Reduce the GAP Early to Focus on Future Learning Rather than Constantly Catching Up
18
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
19
Big Idea #4 RTI is a Renewed Commitment to SUPPORT Teachers
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.Better Tools
Better Training
More Support
19
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.
20www.rti4success.org
Big Idea #5: Use “PROVEN” Assessments Reviewed by the USDE/OSEP National RTI Center
20
21
The Gold Standard for Students for Reading Frequent Progress Monitoring
Sponsored by
22
Design Feature
Big Idea #6: Planned Abandonment
If You Add Something In
You Must Drop Something Out!
22
Sponsored by
23
Sample Items “Planned Abandonment” List
Routine Use of Diagnostic Tests for Every Student
Use of Screening Tests for Annual Progress Monitoring
Referral Forms--Especially Long Ones That Ask Silly Questions
23
Sponsored by
24
Most Schools Have Resources to Build Tier 2
But...Too Many Remedial Programs with Different
- Entry Criterion-Curricula/Interventions, -Assessment and Progress Monitoring Systems
General Education
ELL
Title1
Specialists
RR
Special Education
Big Idea #7: Make Tier 2 Coordinated
Sponsored by
25
Coordinated and Powerful Tier 2 Interventions
• Use Universal Screening to Identify Tier 2 Candidates
• Use a Focused and Scientifically Based Curriculum with an Emphasis on Explicit Teacher-Led Instruction with Explicit Language Support
• Use the Same Scientifically Based Progress Monitoring System
26
Coordinated Data Systems Using Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM)
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Benchmark Using CBM 3x Per Year for Universal Screening AND Progress Monitoring-AND Program Evaluation
Strategic Monitoring of At Risk Students 1x per Month, or 2x per Month or Weekly
26
Frequent Monitoring 1x or 2x per Week
27
We Know the Elementary Path
1. Begin with a Comprehensive Self Study
2. Make a Commitment to Improve General Education Instruction
3. Build Your Data System using Curriculum-Based Measurement As Your Progress Monitoring and Universal Screening Tool
4. Commit to Effective Behavior Support School-wide, but also Classroom and Tier 2 and Tier 3
5. Ensure Tier 3 Interventions are Maximally Powerful (and Worth It) with Scientifically Based Progress Monitoring (e.g., CBM)
6. Build Coordinated Scientifically Based Tier 2 Remedial Reading and Behavior Programs
7. Make Reading Volume a Priority for All Students to Encourage Wide Reading
8. Shift Related Services Roles to Minimal Testing and Maximum Consultation and Coaching Support
28
1. Make a Commitment to Improve General Education Content Teaching Skills a Continuous Staff Development Target-Ensure Access to
• Good Syllabi;
• High Quality Grading;
• Big Ideas Focus;
• Embedded Strategic Instruction Model (SIM) in Pedagogy;
• Strategies to Increase Engagement;
1. Common Assessments for Formative Assessment and Potential Screening
2. Develop Your Special Education Mission Statement (Intensive Basic Skill Interventions OR Content Class Support with SIM)
3. Ensure Tier 3 SE Basic Skill Interventions are Maximally Powerful (and Worth It) with Scientifically Based Progress Monitoring (e.g., CBM)
4. Institute Effective Behavior Support School-wide, but also Classroom and Individual Behavior Support Plans
5. Build Effective Scientifically Based Tier 2 Remedial Basic Skill Interventions At Least at Grade 6 and 9 and Behavior Programs
6. Make Reading Volume a Priority for All Students to Encourage Wide Reading
7. Use CBM (Maze) As Your Universal Screener for Basic Skills
8. Shift Related Services Roles to Minimal Testing and Maximum Consultation and Coaching Support
We Know the Secondary Path
29
Myths-Facts
29
Myth Fact
RTI is about Identifying SLD RTI is Building a Coordinated Services System for All Kids Using Evidenced Based Tools
RTI is About Wait to Fail and Hoop Jumping, Moving Kids Through Tiers
RTI is Using Screening to Triage Kids into Powerful Programs of Appropriate Intensity
RTI is About More Testing, More Meetings, More Inventing, and MORE WORK for Everyone
RTI is About Investing in Better Tools, Better Training, and More Support
RTI is Reactive--Find the Kid(s), THEN Figure Out What to Deliver
RTI is Proactive--Find the Programs to Meet Kids’ Needs, THEN Figure Out Who Gets Them