+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana

Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana

Date post: 26-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
225
REPORT In the matter of Okhla Enclave Plot Holder Welfare Association V/s Union of India and others in I.A. no. 8 & 9 in CWP no. 876/1996
Transcript

REPORT

In the matter of

Okhla Enclave Plot Holder Welfare Association

V/s

Union of India and others in I.A. no. 8 & 9 in CWP no. 876/1996

Before The Hon’ble Arbitrator Justice Sh. Vikramajit Sen, Supreme Court of India(Retd.)

In the matter of

I.A. NOS. 8 & 9 in Writ Petition (Civil) No(s). 876/1996

Okhla Enclave Plot Holder Welfare Association

Petitioner(s)

V/s

Union of India and others

Respondents(s)

With I.A No. 1 in I.A. No. 7, 8,11-12 in I.A.Nos. 8 and 9 and I.A. NO. 5 in I.A Nos. 11-12

And I.A. No. 5 in I.A. Nos. 11-12

And I.A. Nos……….. of 2015

And I.A. No. 171 in I.A. Nos., 8 and 9

in Writ Petition (C) no. 876 of 1996

Report of the committee constituted vide procedural order dated 16-08-2016 in compliance of orders dated

23-07-2016 and 13.7.2018 passed by Hon’ble Arbitrator Mr. Justice Sh. Vikramajit Sen, Former Judge of

Supreme Court in the matter of Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association and others Vs. Union of India

and others.

Hon’ble Arbitrator vide procedural order no. 20 dated 13-07-2018 directed the state to again give state level

advertisements inviting representation from all parties alongwith documents supporting their allotment in

General and EWS category by 13st, July 2018. The cutoff date for submitting application/claims was allowed 4

weeks from the date of advertisement. In compliance of direction, application/claims from general and EWS

plots were sought through public notice advertised on 4-08-2018 in Amar Ujala, Dainik Jagran (Hindi) &

Tribune(English). The last date for receipt of application was 3rd September but due to Saturday and Sunday

on 1st & 2nd September and 3rd September being gazetted holiday the application received upto 4th

September are considered by the committee. Also on 31st August since the matter was listed before the

Hon’ble Tribunal the application received on 31st were down marked on 4th only.

Also in compliance of direction a committee was constituted consisting the following :-

(i) Senior Town Planner, Faridabad (Chairman)

(ii) District Town Planner, Faridabad (Member)

(iii) Representative of Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad (Member)

(iv) Representative of the colonizer of Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd. (Member)

(v) Representative of the concerned Plot Holders Association.

Sh. N.S. Chauhan, Senior Town Planner, Faridabad, Sh. Sanjeev Mann District Town Planner, Faridabad,

Tehsildar Faridabad as representative of Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad, Sh. Ashok Aggarwal representative

of General Plot Holder Association, Sh. Sanjeev Uppal representative of Builder participated during the

scrutiny process.

The first meeting was held on 6-09-2018 regarding scrutiny of claims under general category and EWS

plots and it was decided that keeping in view the time limit fixed by the Hon’ble Arbitrator the scrutiny of

documents will be held 5 days a week to finish the task in time. The committee followed the same performa

as followed for scrutiny of NPNL category.

The term of reference for scrutiny of claims are adopted as per procedural order dated 31-08-2018. During

the scrutiny of documents it has been observed that in general category plots where Builder Buyer Agreement

has been executed, the rate for plot size more than 263 sqyd. had been fixed by developer at rate of 425 per

sqyd. The claimants who paid land cost at the rate of 425 with development charge at rate of 550 sqyd. are

kept in the list at annexure –I, whereas the claimants who paid part land cost /development charge are kept

in the list at annexure –II and no separate annexure who have paid only land cost/no development charge is

prepared. The claimants who could not produce any evidence/documents with regard to booking/ payment of

development charge before cut off date and got saledeed /conveyance deed executed from developer are kept

in annexure –III. In annexure –I, there are 52 claimants whereas in annexure-II there are only 16 claimants and

in annexure –III there are 402 claimants. The entry at serial no. 316 onwards may be decided since the

claimant company could not produced any original document/payment receipts with regard to booking of

plot and it is not clear whether company who invested with the developer got back its invested money at

the time of surrendering the original document. Multiple allotments and the plots which are sold more than

one person are highlighted in the list.

Under EWS category, plots were allotted through draw of lots for economically weaker section whose

family income was not more than 1500/- per month. In Durga Builder colony draw of such plot was held on

30-07-1994 (G block) and 18-11-1995 (H block) where 350 person were successful. Only 106 applicants applied

their claims for allotment under EWS category. The applicants claims who were successful candidates in draw

held in 1994 under chairmanship of DTP was checked with the list signed by the DTP and found in order

whereas for draw held in 1995 is based on a list supplied by developer to department in 2013. Claimant

name at serial no. 94 is not in the list of successful candidates.

ANNEXURE –I

GENERAL CATEGORY

Sr. No.

Name of Claimant

Address Details of plot no., area (sqyd.) rate/ phase / Block

Details of booking / land cost

Details of Development charge

Total amount paid /Details of Builder Buyer Agreement/Saledeed if any etc.

Findings /Remarks

1 Mr. Shreemali Agarwal S/o D.K Agarwal

82, Satish Park, Modinagar, Gaziabad-201204

114-C, Block-D, area 289.43 sqyd. @ 975, Phase -I

BBA executed on 15-02-1996 in favour of Shreemali Aggarwal for plot no. D-114C area 289.43 sqyd. On payment of Rs. 282194/-

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/development charge upto 15-02-1996.

Smt. Renu aggarwal appeared on behalf of her son . Sh. Bhasim executed saledeed on plot no. D-114 area 289.43 sqyd. Phase -I on payment 282194/- vide deed no. 8480 dated 10-10-1996.As per developer letter dated 24-08-1994 the same plot was allotted to claiment. BBA was executed on 15-02-1996 for same plot/area @975 on payment of 282194/-. The developer offered physical possesion vide letter dated 4-12-1996.

Claimant paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @425 per sqyd. And paid 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

2 Sh. D.C. Verma S/o Sh. H.L. Verma through GPA Sh.Guru Prasad S/o Sh. Rajender Prasad

RZ-31B, Vijay Enclave, South West Delhi-110045

1) 2715, Sec-II, 250 sqyd. @ 120 (1989) 2) 4896, Sec-IV, 250 sqyd, @ 120 (1991) 3) F-80(289.43 sqyd.) (1994)

Booked plot on 17-02-1989 and paid Rs. 27500/- as land cost upto 28-12-1991. Claimant also paid RS. 2500/- as tranfer fee.

Claimant paid 82250/- as development charge in year1992-1994. Claimant also paid Rs. 169944/- as land cost/ development charge in 1994-95.

Sh. D.C Verma booked plot no. 2715, sec-II, area 250 sqyd @ 120 on 10.03.1989 and also paid 2500/- as transfer fee Paid Rs. 27500/- as land cost upto 1991. As per receipt dated 15.10.1994, the plot no. further changted to 80, block-F, area 289.43 sqyd and the claiment paid additional land cost/development charge in year 1994-95 and also allotment letter was issued on 10.04.1994. BBA executed on 14.03.1996 for this plot/area @ 975 on payment of 282194/-.

Claimant paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @425 per sqyd. And paid 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

3 Sh. Alok Gupta S/o Sh. Kulbhushan Gupta

H-192, Ashok Vihar, PH-I, Delhi-110052

1)4142, Sec-I, 2)112, block D, 289.43 sqyd.

As per receipt, claimant paid Rs. 152880/- as land cost/ development from 24-12-1992 to 14-08-1995. As per the claimant few receipts are missing and produced the copy of FIR dated 9-12-2013 regarding

paid Rs. 152880/- as land cost/ development from 24-12-1992 to 14-08-1995.

Paid 152880/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. BBA executed in favour of Alok Gupta for plot 112 on 31-10-1995 area 289.43 sqyd @975 on payment 269280/- with a rebet of 10% i.e. 12914/-

Claimant paid Rs. 110094/ as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd . With a rebet of 10% i.e. 12914/- @425 per sqyd. and paid 159186/- as development charge

the lost of receipt of plot no. 112 , block D amount 116640/- land cost and developemnt change between 1992-1995.

@550 per sqyd.

4 Sh. Virender Kapoor S/o S.L. Kapoor

C-24, Second Floor, Old Double Storey, Lajpat Nagar-4, New Delhi-110024

11, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd. 2) 4407, Sec-IV, 250 sqyd. 3) 16/17, Sec-II,

Booked ploton 27-05-1992 and paid Rs. 42500/- as land cost upto 6-06-1992.

Claimant paid Rs. 264370/- as development charge from 30-06-1992 to 2-01-1996.

Paid Rs. 306870/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1996. BBA was executed on 6-02-1997 for plot no. 11 block I area 289.43 sqyd. @975 per sqyd. On payment of 282194/-

Paid Rs. 159187/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. and also paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per syd. For area 289.43 sqyd.

5 Smt. Meenu Chandra D/o Dr. Bhisham Chandra

149, Hansi Road, Bhiwani

A)3836, S-III/I, 250 sqyd.@120 per sqyd. B)63, block-D, PH-1, meausring 289.43 sqyd

Booked plot on 23-08-1987 and paid Rs.34732/- as land cost upto 1994.

Claimant paid 95222/- development charge upto 1994.

Paid Rs. 129954/- as land cost/ development charge uptp 1994. As per letter dated 20-12-1997 by developer an amount of 129954/- is reported paid against the total cost of 282194/- The remaining amount 152240/- is paid vide check no. 545289 and 762642 which shows that the claimant paid land cost/ development charge prior 1999. Sh. Moti Sagar vasisth appeared on behalf of claimant Late Smt. Darshna Chandra & Smt. Meenu Chandra booked plot no. 3823 & 3836, area 250 sqyd @ 120 on 23.08.1987. As per receipt dated 18.06.1994 plot no. changed to 63, block-D, PH-1, meausring 289.43 sqyd and th claiment paid 4732/- additional payment on amount of land cost & 12972/- as development charge in year 1994. BBA was exeucted on 22.09.1998 for plot no. 63, block-D, area 289.43 sqyd @ 975 on payment 282194/-. The claiment informed that except receipt produced he has copy

Paid Rs. 159187/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. and also paid Rs.123007/- as land cost @ 425 per syd. For area 289.43 sqyd.

of the rest of payment receipt.

6 Smt. Gogi Saroj Pal W/o Sh. Ved Nayar & Sh. Ved Nayar S/o Sh. H.C Nayar

B-180(GF), Captain Gaur Marg, Near Iskon Temple, east of Kailash-1, Sriniwaspuri, South Delhi-110065

A)B-232 C area 418.6 sqyd. B)70, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Paid RS. 26000 and 24000 as land cost for two plot as land cost during 1987-1991.

Paid RS. 65800+65800/- as development charge in year 1992-1994. Claimant also paid Rs.105094/- as additional land cost/ development charge.

Ms. Gogi Saroj Pal and Mr. ved Nayar booked two plot seprately. Plot no. b-232 C area 418.6 sqyd alloted jointly in name of Ms. Gogi saroj Pal and Sh. Ved Nayer as per developer letter dated 16-04-1994. BBA was executed on 23-01-1996 in favour of Smt. Gogi Saroj Pal and sh. Ved Nayar for plot no. 70 block D area 289.43 sqyd @975 on payment of 282194/- possession letter was issued on 25-04-1997. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. D-70 area 289.43 sqyd , phase-i on payment of 282,194/- vide deed no. 8481 dated 3-10-1996.

Paid Rs. 159187/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. and also paid Rs.123007/- as land cost @ 425 per syd. For area 289.43 sqyd.

7 Sh. Brij Mohan Lall S/o Sh. B.N Lall

GH-2/39-D, Ankur Apartment, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi-110063

A) 22, S-II, 250 sqyd. @90 per sqyd. (1992) B) 2554, 100 sqyd. (1993) C) 67, Block-I, PH-II, 289 sqyd.(1996)

Booked plot on 17-02-1992 and paid 22580/- as land cost on 23-06-1992 and also paid RS. 7500/- as transfer fee.

Claimant paid RS. 259694/- as development charge on 26-11-1996.

Paid Rs. 282234/- as land cost/ development charge. BBA was executed on 27-08-1996 for plot no. 67 block I area 289 sqyd and rate not mentioned on payment of Rs. 282194/-

Claimant paid Rs. 158950/- as development charge @ 550 per sqyd. And paid 123244/- as land cost fro plot size 289 sqyd @425 per sqyd.

8 Amita Sharma W/o Late Sh. Vijay Babu

118, Ashiana Greens, Ahinsa Khand-2, Indirapuram-201014 Gaziabad

a) 391, Sec-I, 250 sqyd. @ 110 B) 108, Block-D, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 03.12.1992 and paid Rs. 27700/- as land cost upto 11.12.1992 and also paid 7500/- as transfer fee.

Paid Rs. 82250/- as development charge in year 1993. Claimant also paid 137112/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 247062/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. The allotment letter for plot 89, Block-I, 289.43 sqyd., area was issued by developer 11.07.1994. As per BBA exeucted on 21.07.1995 for plot no. 108, block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd @ 975 per sqyd on total payment of 306562/-.

Claimant paid 159186/- as development charge @ 550 for plot size 289.43 sqyd. And apid 123008/- as land cost @ 425 per sqyd.

9 Sh. Sudhir Datta S/o Late Sh. V.P Datta & Mrs. Anita Datta W/o Sh.

D15/6, 2nd Floor, Presidency floors, ARDEE City, Sector-52,

a) 637, S-III/I, 252 sqyd, @ Rs. 120 per sqyd (1987) b) 89, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked Plot on 06-08-1987 and paid Rs 30240/- as land cost up to 1991.

Claimant paid Rs. 250954/- as land cost/development charge in year 1995-96.

Claimant paid 281194/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. As per receipt dt. 22-05-1996 plot no. change to 89, block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sq. yard. BBA was executed on 22-05-1996 for plot no. 89,

Claimant paid 159187/- as development charge @ 550 for plot size 289.43 sqyd. And apid

Sudhir Datta Gururgram. (1989) block-I, area 289.43 sqyd @ 975 on total payment of 2,82,194/-. Possession of the plot was taken over by the claimant on 03-08-1996. As per the copy of sale deed no. 1929 dt. 04-02-2008 (registry no. 24237) produce by claimant the sale deed of this plot has been exeucted in favour of Sh. Ram Avtar s/o Sh. Jagdish. A complaint has also been lodged by the claimant against this sale deed on 14-08-2008 in police station Sarai Khawaja. The claimant has also brought to sub registrar on 14-08-2008 for cancellation of sale deed.

123008/- as land cost @ 425 per sqyd.

10 Sh. Binod Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Radhey Shyam Gupta

495, Block-R U Pitam Pura, Delhi-110088

a) 1151, Block-B, Sec-III/I, 252 sqyd. @110 per sqyd. b) 4, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 30-11-1986 and paid Rs. 25850 Upto 1991.

Paid Rs.94750/- as development charges in year 1992 to 1995. Claimant also paid Rs. 124264/- as land cost/ development charge in year 1992-1995.

Paid Rs.244864/- as land cost / development charge. Sh. Binod Kumar Gupta booked plot no. 1151 sec-III/II area 252 sqyd @110 on 30-11-1986 and paid land cost/development charge upto 1995. As per receipt dt 20-12-1994 plot no. change to 4 , E area 289.43 sqyd and claiment paid additional land cost/developmment charge in year 1994-1995. BBA was executed on 22-11-1995 for plot no. 4 E area 289.43 sqyd @975 on payment of 246514. As per the schedule given in BBA rebet of 24676/- and 11004/- was given to the claimant by developer as per note on BBA mentioning zero balance.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 85678/- as land cost @425 per sqyd. after availing rebet of Rs. 24676/-

11 Smt. Raj Verma W/o Late Sh. C.P Verma

17, Gali No. 6, PH-I, Qutab Vihar, New Delhi-110071

A)1215, Sec-I, 250 sqyd.@110 per sqyd. B) 24 block I, phase-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Paid Rs. 27500/- on 29-01-1992 as land cost and also paid RS. 2500/- as transfer fee.

Paid 254470/- as developmnet charge in year 1992-1995.

Paid Rs.281970/-as land cost / development charge upto 1995. As per developer letter dt. 29-03-1996 plot no. 24 ,block - I phase II area 289 sqyd was allotted to claiment. Whereas possesion of plot was offered for plot no. 24, I area 289.43 sqyd. by builder

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs.

on 24-11-1996. BBA was executed on 5-06-1996 for plot no. 24, block I area 289.43 Sqyd. @975 on payment of 282194/-

123005/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

12 Smt. Navjeet Kaur W/o Sh. Parvinder Singh

C-2/47, DDA Flats, near Iskon Temple, East of Kailash, Sriniwaspuri, south Delhi-110065

a) 2948, Sec-I, 250 sqyd . @100/120/150 per sqyd. b) 110, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 22-01-1994 and paid Rs.58000/- as land cost upto 13-12-1994.

Claiamnt paid Rs. 99762/- as development charge in year 1994 -1995. Claimant also paid Rs. 121932/- as additional land cost/ development charge in 1995.

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1995. As per receipt dated 03.08.1995 plot no. Changed to 110, block-D, PH-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. BBA was exeucted on 22.08.1995 for plot no. 110 block D, ph-I area 289.43 sqyd. @ 975 on payment of 282194/-.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

13 Smt. Pushpal Uppal W/o Sh. S.S Uppal

B/22, Candituft Lane, Ashiana Gardens, PO Sonari, Jamshedpur, Purbi Singhbhum, Jharkhand-831011

a) 1927, Sec-III/I, 250 sqyd.@ 100/90 per sqyd. b) 6577, Sec-III/II, 250 sqyd. C) 16, Block-C, 502.32 sqyd. D) 115, Block-D, PH-I, 418.60sqyd.

Booked plot on 28-01-1994 and paid Rs. 69500/- as land cost upto 12-04-1994 and also paid Rs. 3000+2500 as transfer fee.

Claimant paid Rs. 164500/- as development charge in year 1994. Claimant also paid 238355/- as land cost/ development charge in 1994 -1995.

Paid Rs. 472355/- as land cost/ development upto 1995. Plot no. Changed to plot no. 16 block-C, area 502.32 sqyd as per receited dated 22.09.1994 and again to plot no. 115D, area 418 sqyd . BBA was exected on 25.09.1995 for plot no. 115C, block-D area 418.6 sqyd @ 975 on payment on 408135/- excluding 61220/- as cornor charges.

Claimant paid Rs. 230230/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 418.6 sqyd. and paid Rs. 177905/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

14 Sh. Ajinder Khurana W/o Sh. Kultar Singh Kumar

A-268, Shivalik Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.

a) 1834, Sec-I, 250 sqyd. @150 per sqyd. b) 1377, 1378, Sec-III/I, 250 sqyd. c) 208, Block-B, 418.60 sqyd. d) 40, Block-F, 502.32 sqyd. e) 131, Block-D, PH-I, 672.75 sqyd.

Booked plot on 14-02-1994 on payment of 37500/- as alnd cost and also paid RS. 8500/- as transfer fee.

Claimant paid Rs. 279650/- as development charge in year 1994 and also paid Rs. 338781 /- as land cost/ development charge in 1994-1995.

Paid Rs. 655931/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1995. Sh. B.S Mehta appeared on behalf of claiment. plot no. changed to 1834, Sec-I, area 250 sqyd 18.03.1994 and further to plot no. 3221, Sec-II, area 100 sqyd. As per receipt dated 22.09.1994 plot no. change to 340 block-F, area 502 sqyd and again to 131C, as per receipt dt. 14.09.1995 area 672.75 sqyd. BBA exeucted on 25.09.1995 for plot no. 131, cornor block-D, area 672.75 sqyd @ 975 on total payment of 655931/-.

Claimant paid Rs. 370012/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 672.75 sqyd. and paid Rs. 285919/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

15 Smt. Kawal Mehta W/o Sh. Kuljinder Singh Mehta

59-D, Bhai Randhir singh Nagar, Ludhiana

a) 2123, Sec-III/II, 100 sqyd. @180 per sqyd. b) 1540, Sec-III/II, 250 sqyd. c) 142, Block-B, 418.60 sqyd. d) 69, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 7-02-1994 on payment of 45000/- as land cost and also paid Rs. 8500/- as transfer fee,

Claimant paid Rs. 115150/- as development charge in year 1994. Claimant paid Rs. 122044/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1994-1995.

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. Sh. B.S Mehta apeared on behalf of claiment. As per receipt dated 23.08.1994 plot no. changed to 3123, Sec-III which was further changed to 142, block-B 418.6 sqyd as per receipt dated 22.09.1994. This plot no. was further chagned to 69 block-D, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. BBA was executed on 22-08-1995 for this plot @ 975 on payment of 282194/-

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

16 Sh. Bhagat Singh Negi S/o Sh. Inder Singh Negi

2954, Gali No. 1, Dharm Pura, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031

a) 47, Sec-II, 252 sqyd.@90 per sqyd. (1986) b) 2, Block-E, phase-I, 289.43 sqyd.(1994)

Booked plot on 31-10-1986 and paid Rs. 22680/- as land cost upto 16-03-1991.

Paid devlopment charges Rs. 82908/- in year 1991-1993. Claimant also paid Rs. 176597/- as aditional land cost/ development charges. Claimant also paid Rs. 28943/- as statutary fee.

Claimant paid Rs. 282185/- as land cost / development charge upto 1995.As per the receipt dt 8-8-1994 plot no. 2 block E area 289.43 sqyd was allotted . BBA for the plot no. 2 block E area 289.43 sqyd @975 was executed on 13-06-1996 on payment of 282194/- also possession letter was issued 12-08-1996.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

17 Sh. Affaque Ahmad Siddiqui S/o Sh. Mohammad Ahmad

C/o 30-D, Pocket-C, Siddhartha Extn., New Delhi- 110014

a) 2735, Sec-II, 250 sqyd. b) 42, phase -I Block-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 23-06-1993 on payment of 40000/- as land cost and also paid 7500/- as transfer fee.

Paid RS. 82250/- as development charge on 1-01-1994. Claimant also paid Rs. 159944/- as land cost/ development charge.

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1996. As per receipt dated 13-08-1994 plot no. changed to 42 block I area 289.43 sqyd.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. For plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

18 Sh. Abdul Jabbar Ansari S/o Ghulam Husain Ansari

30-D, Pocket-C, Siddharth Extn. New Delhi- 110014

a) 734, Sec-III/I, 100 sqyd.@100 per sqyd.(1987) b) 1286, Sec-I, 100 sqyd. (1991)

Booked plot on 23-02-1987 and paid Rs. 36000/- as land cost upto 1991. Claimant also paid Rs. 6000/- as transfer fee.

Paid Rs. 98700/- as development charge in year 1992-1993 and alos paid Rs. 187494/- as land

Paid Rs. 322194/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1996.As per receipt no. 12.10.1991 plot no. changed to 1286, sec-I, and further as per receipt dated 26.06.1993 changed to 2782, sec-II. As per

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. For plot size 289.43 sqyd.

c) 2782, Sec-II, 200sqyd. @130 per sqyd.(1993) D) 71 block I phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. (1996)

cost/ developemnt charge in year 1996.

receipt dated 21.03.1996 plot no. further changed to 71, block-I, PH-II, measuring 289.43 sqyd and th claiment also paid additional land cost of the development charge in year 1996.

and paid Rs.163008/- as land cost @563 per sqyd.

19 Smt. Urmila Sharma W/o Sh. Dinesh Sharma

390, Sector- 17, Faridabad, Haryana- 121002

a) 2711, area 250 sqyd. Sec-II, @ 120 b) 43, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Sh. A.S Parmar book plot no 07.07.1987 and paid 30000/- upto 1991 as land cost. The plot was transferred in favour of Smt. Urmila Sharma on payment of 25000/-.

Claimant paid Rs. 82250/- as development charge in year 1992-93 and also paid 136189/- as land cost/development charge in 1994 -1995. As per consolidated receipt dated 08.07.1997 in name of Smt. Urmila Sharma the total amount paid against plot no. 43, block-E is 282194/-.

Claimant paid 282194/- as land cost/development charge upto 1997 and also paid 28943/- as statutory fee. As per BBA executed by developer with Sh. A.S Parmar on 31.01.1996 for plot no. E-43, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. Tota amount 282194/- @ 975 per sqyd. the developer executed saledeed of this plot area 289.43 sqyd on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Urmila Sharma vide deed no. 4322 dated 13.07.2004.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. For plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs.123008/- as land cost @ 425 per sqyd.

20 Smt. Joginder Mehta W/o Sh. Bajinder Singh Mehta

G-61, Lajpat Nagar-3, Block-G, Lajpat Nagar, S.O, South Delhi-110024

75, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 18.02.1994 on payment of 45000/- and also paid Rs. 2500/- as transfer fee.

Paid 5000/- as development charge in year 1994 and as per copy of receipt dated 11.08.1995 Claimant paid 232194/- as development charge for the same plot.

Claimant paid 282194/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. BBA was executed on 07.09.1995 for plot no. 75, block-D, area 289.43 sqyd. @ 975 on payment of 282194/-.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. For plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

21 Sh. K.S Khurana S/o Jai Ram Singh

A-268, Shivalik Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.

a) 4004, Sec-III, 250 sqyd. b) 1559, area 100 sqyd. c) 209, Block-B, area 418.6 sqyd.

Booked plot on 14.06.1994 and paid 41000/-as land cost and paid 3500/- as transfer fee.

Paid 115150/- as development charge in year 1994 claimant also paid 313205/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Claimant paid 408135/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. BBA was executed on 28.09.1995 for plot no. 209, Block-B, area 418.6 sqyd. @ 975 on payment of 408135/- excluding 61220/- for corner charges.

Paid Rs. 230230/- as development charge @ 550 per sqyd. for plot size 418.60 sqyd. and paid Rs. 177905/- as land cost @ 425 per sqyd.

22 Sh. Bajinder Singh S/o Sh. G.S Mehta

G-61, Block-G, Lajpat Nagar-III, Delhi.

a) 666, Sec-III/I, 250 sqyd. b) 76, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 22.08.1995 on payment of 27500/-

Paid 250000/- as development charge in year 1995. Claimant also paid 47023/- as additional land cost/development charge.

Claimant paid 324523/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. As per receipt dated 16.09.1995 plot no. changed to 76, block-D, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd,. BBA was executed on 06.09.1995 for plot no. 76C block-D, area 289.43 sqyd @ 975 on total payment of 282194/- and 42329/- as corner charges.

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. for plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

23 Smt. Anjana Kak W/o Sh. Raj Kumar Kak

H.No. C-40, Omaxe Green Valley, Sector- 41-42, Faridabad, Haryana- 121003

D-79, Ph-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 8-10-1996 on payment of 284194/- Paid Rs. 15000/- as transfer on 7-10-1996.

Paid Rs. 284194/- as land cost/development charges.

Paid Rs.284194/- as land cost/development charges. BBA executed on 17-10-1996 for plot plot no.79 block D area 289.43 sqyd. @975 per sqyd. on payment of Rs. 284194/-

Claimant paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd. For plot size 289.43 sqyd. and paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd.

24 Sh. Pitamber Lal S/o Sh. Arjun Dass & Smt. Jyoti Rani W/o Sh. Pitamber Lal

140/14, Amrit Puri-B, Opp. ISKCON Temple, East of kailash, New Delhi- 65,

a) 310, S-II, 200 sqyd. @100 per sqyd. b) 48, Block-E, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

As per consolidated receipt dated 29-10-1992 cliamant paid Rs. 20000/- as land cost.

Claimant paid RS. 65800/- as development charge in year 1992-1993. Claimant also paid Rs. 238723/- as additiopnal land cost/ development charge in year 1994-1996.

Paid Rs. 324523/- - as land cost/development charge upto 1996. BBA was executed on 29-04-1996 for plot no. 48, block E, 289.43 sqyd @975 per sqyd on payment of Rs. 282194/- excluding Rs. 42329/- as corner charges. Developer executed saledeed of this plot on payment of 324523/- vide sale deed no. 8479 dated 10-10- 1996.

Paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd @425 per sqyd. And paid Rs. 159186/- as development charge 550 per sqyd.

25 Dr. Vipul Narain Roy S/o Late U.N Roy

Flat no. H-46, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi- 110076,

A-29, Ph-I,502 Sq. Yards

As per the registry dated 21-11-1997, deed no. 11564 developer executed saledeed of plot no. 29 block A area 502 sqyd. On payment of 490000/-

Paid 490000/- as land cost/ development charge on/upto 21-11-1997 as per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him which are misplaced.

Paid 490000/- as land cost/ development charge. BBA was executed on 8-11-1996 for plot no. 29 block A area 502 sqyd. @ 975 per sqyd. On payment of 490000/-

Paid Rs. 213350/- as land cost for plot size 502 sqyd. @425 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 276650/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

26 Sh. Sanjeev Kalia S/o Sh. Milkhi Ram

25 LIG Flats Madangir Opp. Khanpur, Bus Depot, New Delhi- 110062,

E-18, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

As per consolidated receipt dated 8-04-1996. Claimant paid 282185+9 as land cost/ development charge. As per claimant the original receipt were taken by the developer.

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/ developemnt charge upto 1996.

Paid Rs. 282194/- as land cost/ developemnt charge. BBA executed on 29-04-1996 for plot no 18 , block E area 289.43 sqyd. @975 per sqyd. On payment of Rs. 282194/-

claiamant paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd @ 425 per sqyd and paid RS. 159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

27 Sh. Manoj Prakash Jain S/o Late Sh. Jayanti P. Jain and Tarun Kumar Jain Mittal S/o Late Sh. J.P Mittal

K-187, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi - 110023,

(a) 3814 block -I , 252 sqyd @120 per sqyd. (b) E-21, Ph-I,279.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Tarun Kumar Mittal appeared on behalf of claimant. Sh. Manoj Prakash Jain booked plot no. 3814, sec-I, area 252 sqyd @ 120 on 30.03.1987 and paid Rs. 31000/- as land cost upto 1992.

claimant paid 82250/- as development charge in year 1992-94. The claimant paid 169944/- as land cost and develoment charge in year 1994-96.

Paid Rs.283194/- as land cost/ development charge. As per receipt dated 27.08.1994 plot no. chagned to 21, block-E, area 289.43 sqyd. BBA was exeucted on 13.02.1997 plot no. 21, block-E, area 279.43 sqyd @ 975 per sqyd. on total payment of 272445/-

Claiamnt paid Rs. 118758/- as land cost for plot size 279.43 sqyd @ 425 per sqyd and paid RS. 153687/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

28 Smt. Rittu Mittal W/o Sh. Rajender Mittal and Smt. Rekha Mittal W/o Sh. Jitender Mittal

1000, Sector- 19, Kheri Kalan, Faridabad

B-150, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

BBA executed on 24.02.1996 for Plot no. 150, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd @ 975 on payment of 408135/-. Developer executed sale of plot no. 150, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd on

Paid 408135/- as land cost/development charge.

Paid 408135/- as land cost/development charge.

Claimant paid 177905/- as land cost for plot size 418.60 sqyd. @ 425 and paid 230230/- as development charge @ 550 per sqyd.

payment of 408135/- in favour of Smt. Naz Mehmud W/o Tahir Mehmud vide deed no. 14479 dated07.09.1997. As per the claimant no payment receipt except BBA & sale deed. Smt. Naz through SPA Smt. Anita Garg executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ritu Mittal & Smt. Rekha Mittal on payment of 850000/- vide deed no. 22795 dated 17.01.2008.

29 Dr Shakeel Ahmad S/o Sh. Nihal Ahmad

B-27/305, Batla House, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi

J-117, Ph-II, 290 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 20.01.1993 on payment of 312620/- as land cost/development charge.

Paid 312620/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993.

BBA was executed on 20.01.1993 for plot no. J-117, Ph-II, 290 Sq. Yards. @ 1075 per sqyd on payment of 312620/-.

Paid 152250/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 290 sqyd. And paid 160370/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

30 Smt. Kulvinder Kaur W/o Sh. Parminder Kaur

265/09, Pooranpur, Pilibhit, Uttarpradesh

A-34, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 05.05.1992 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 502200/- as land cost/development charge in year 1992-95.

Paid 552200/- as land cost/development charge in year 1992-95.

BBA executed on 10.01.1995 for plot no. A-34, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards @ 1100 per sqyd on payment of 552200/-.

Paid 276100/- as land cost @ 550 per sqyd. for plot size 502 sqyd. And paid 276100/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

31 Sh. Sham Sunder S/o Sh. Ram Chander

599, Sector- 09, Panchkula, Haryana

J-139, Ph-II, 267 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 22.07.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 250375/- as land cost/development charge in

Paid 300375/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 07.02.1995 for plot no. J-139, 267 Sq. Yards @ 1125 per sqyd on payment of 300375/-.

Paid 153525/- as land cost @ 575 per sqyd. for plot size 267 sqyd. and paid 146850/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

year 1993-95.

32 Smt. Suman Goel W/o Sh. Devi Lal Goel

Anaj Mandi, Elenabad, Distt- Sirsa, Haryana

D-94, Ph-I, 289 Sq. yards

Booked plot on 09.09.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 07.02.1995 for plot no. D-94, Ph-I, 289 Sq. yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 .

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. and paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

33 Sh. Jaswant Singh S/o Sh. Gian Singh

WE-259, Sant Nagar, Sahibpura, New Delhi- 110018

I-04, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 04.05.1994 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 21.08.1995 for plot no. I-04, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 .

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. And paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

34 Sh. Virender Kumar S/o Sh. Sakaldeep Prasad

921/1, Gali no. 4, Shiv Colony, Vill. Palla, Faridabad

I-28, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 19.11.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 25.08.1995 for plot no. I-28, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 .

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. nd paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

35 Sh. Gurmeet Singh S/o Sh. Charan Singh

0-9, Mahavir Nagar, New Delhi- 110018

D-72, Ph-I, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 10.02.1994 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

BBA executed on 04.02.1995 for plot no. D-72, Ph-I, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 .

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. And paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

36 Sh. Brijpal Chhokar S/o Sh. Kabaz Singh

5/67, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi- 110017

K-14, Ph-II, 502 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 22.01.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 502200/- as land

Paid 552200/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 02.05.1995 for plot no. K-14, Ph-II, 502 Sq. Yards on payment of 552200/-@ 1100 per sqyd.

Paid 276100/- as land cost @ 550 per sqyd. for plot size 502 sqyd. and paid 276100/- as development charge

cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

@ 550/- per sqyd.

37 Smt. Geeta Pal W/o Sh. Omkar Pal

L-1, 7/377, Sangam Vihar, New Delhi

J-142, Ph-II, 287 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 15.11.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 272875/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

Paid 322875/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 04.02.1995 for plot no. J-142, Ph-II, 287 Sq. Yards on payment of 322875/- @ 1125 per sqyd..

Paid 165025/- as land cost @ 575 per sqyd. for plot size 287 sqyd. and paid 157850/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

38 Smt. Kamla Rani W/o Late Sh. Devi Dayal

T-510/E-6, Hill Marg, Baljeet Nagar, Patel Nagar, New Delhi- 110008

J-127, Ph-II, 293 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 30.03.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 279625/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 329625/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 28.03.1995 for plot no. J-127, Ph-II, 293 Sq. Yards on payment of 329625/- @ 1125 per sqyd.

Paid 168475/- as land cost @ 575 per sqyd. for plot size 287 sqyd. and paid 161650/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

39 Smt. Anita Lal W/o Sh. Vikas Lal

H.No. 260, Masjid Moth, New Delhi- 110049

D-92, Ph-I, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 20.12.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 29.03.1995 for plot no. D-92, Ph-I, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 per sqyd.

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. and paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

40 Sh. Surinder Singh S/o Sh. Charan Singh

133, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi

A-27, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 05.05.1992 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 502200/- as land cost/development charge in year 1992-95.

Paid 552200/- as land cost/development charge in year 1992-95.

BBA executed on 10.01.1995 for plot no. A-27, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards on payment of 552200/-@ 1100 per sqyd.

Paid 276100/- as land cost @ 550 per sqyd. for plot size 502 sqyd. and paid 276100/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

41 Smt. Poonam Taneja W/o Sh. Vikram Taneja

G-1/9, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi

I-86, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 30.03.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-

BBA executed on 28.03.1995 for plot no. I-86, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 per sqyd.

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. For plot size 289 sqyd. And paid 158950/- as

260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

95. development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

42 Smt. Uma Devi Mourya W/o Sh. Rajender Kumar

320, Gali no. 4, Guru Ram Das Nagar, Delhi- 92

I-05, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 14.02.1994 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1994-95.

BBA executed on 02.03.1995 for plot no. I-05, Ph-II, 289 Sq. Yards on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 per sqyd.

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. And paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

43 Sh. B.D Ceylony S/o Sh. Velyati Ram

4/40, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi- 110005

B-135, Ph-I, 418 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 04.03.1993 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 420250/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

Paid 470250/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 06.04.1995 for plot no. B-135, Ph-I, 418 Sq. Yards on payment of 470250/- @ 1125 per sqyd.

Paid 240350/- as land cost @ 575 per sqyd. for plot size 418 sqyd. and paid 229900/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

44 Sh. Hardayal Singh S/o Sh. Balwant Singh

34-35, Begumpur, P.O Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-110017

D-62, PH-I, 289 sqyd.

Booked plot on 29.12.1992 on payment of 50000/- as land cost/development charge and also paid 260675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

Paid 310675/- as land cost/development charge in year 1993-95.

BBA executed on 11.11.1994 for plot no. D-62, PH-I, 289 sqyd. on payment of 310675/- @ 1075 per sqyd.

Paid 151525/- as land cost @ 525 per sqyd. for plot size 289 sqyd. and paid 158950/- as development charge @ 550/- per sqyd.

45 Sh. Rakesh Gupta S/o Sh. Bhaya Ram Gupta

H.No. B-6/77, Safdar Jung Enclave, New Delhi- 110029

a) 6683, S-III, 250 sqyd. @120 per sqyd. b)I-86, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Claimant booked plot on 1-12-1987 area 250 sqyd @120 per sqyd. And paid Rs. 31250/- upto 15-02-1990

Paid Rs. 135069/- as development charge during 1992-1995. Claiamnt also paid RS. 115875/- as additional land cost/ development charge in 1996.

Paid Rs. 282194/-plot no. changed to 86 block I area 289.43 sqyd. as per receipt dated 28-05-1996. BBA was executed on 10-06-1996 for plot no. 86 block I areA 289.43 sqyd @975 per sqyd. on payment of Rs.282194/-

Claimant paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd @425 per sqyd. And paid Rs. 159187/- as development charges @550 per sq.yd.

46 Sh. Ram Mehar H.No. B-6/77, a)6884, S-III, 250 Claimant booked plot on 1- Paid Rs. 82250/- as Paid Rs. 284694/-plot no. changed to 87 Claimant paid Rs.

Gupta S/o Sh. Bhaya Ram Gupta

Safdar Jung Enclave, New Delhi- 110029

sqyd.@120 per sqyd. b)I-87, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

12-1987 area 250 sqyd @120 per sqyd. And paid Rs. 32500/- upto 15-02-1990

development charge during 1992-1993. Claiamnt also paid RS. 16944/- as additional land cost/ development charge in 1996.

block I area 289.43 sqyd. as per receipt dated 28-05-1996. BBA was executed on 10-06-1996 for plot no. 87 block I arae 289.43 sqyd @975 per sqyd. on payment of Rs.282194/-

123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd @425 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 159187/- as development charges @550 per sq.yd.

47 Sh. Sanjay Aggarwal S/o Sh. Chunnumal and Sh. Pawan Garg S/o Sh. Raghunath Garg

1339/37, Faridabad and 1109/19, Faridabad

D-73, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

As per BBA executed on 27-12-1995 with Sh. Kulbhushan Khosla plot no. 73 block D area 289.43 sqyd. was allotted @975 per sqyd. On payment of 282194/- with rebet of 28925/- (253269/-)

The claimant paid Rs. 253269/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1996 as per saledeed dated 22-04-1996

BBA executed on 27-12-1995 with Sh. Kulbhushan Khosla plot no. 73 block D area 289.43 sqyd. was allotted @975 per sqyd. On payment of 282194/- with rebet of 28925/- Developer executed sale deed of plot no. D-73, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. in favour of Sh. Kulbhushan Khosla on payment of Rs.253269/- vide deed no. 9955 dated 22-04-1996 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sanjay Aggarwal S/o Sh. Chunnumal and Sh. Pawan Garg S/o Sh. Raghunath Garg on payment of Rs. 1071000/- vide deed no. 6638 dated 16-06-2008.

Claiamant paid Rs.94083/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @425 per sqyd after availing rebet of Rs. 28925 and paid Rs.159186/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

48 Sh. Alok B Mathur and Sh. Atul B Mathur

B-2/95, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi-29

18, Block B, phase-I, area 502.32 sqyd.

As per receipts dated 21-09-1995 claimant paid Rs. 272762/- as land cost/development charge.

paid Rs. 272762/- as land cost/development chargeupto 1995.

BBA was executed on 26-07-1996 for plot no. 18 block B area 502.32 sqyd @975 per sqyd. on payment of Rs.489762/-

Claimant paid Rs. 213486/- as land cost @425 per sqyd. for plot size 502.32 sqyd. and paid Rs. 276276/- as development charge @550 per sqyd.

49 Sh. Vikas Mangla S/o Sh. Ram Ashrey Mangla

226/6, ward no. 23, Kanungo Mohalla, Palwal

3, block A, 502.32 sqyd, phase-I

As per BBA dated 15-06-1996 plot no. 3 block A area 502.32 sqyd. Was allotted @975 on payment

Paid Rs. 490000/- as land cost/development charge as per BBA

Paid Rs. 490000/- as land cost/development charge. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 3, Block-A, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 490000 /- in favour of Smt.

Claimant paid Rs. 213486 /- as land cost for plot size 502.32 sqyd.@425 per

of 490000/- dated 15-06-1996 Seema D/o Sh. Sethi Lal and Smt. Asha Grover W/o L.K. Grover vide deed no. 11222 dated 17-11-1997 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ranwati W/o Ram Krishan on payment of 350000/- vide deed no. 21983 dated 8-01-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sh. Vikas Mangla S/o Sh. Ram Ashrey Mangla on payment of RS. 800000/- vide deed no. 12643 dated 3-12-2010

sqyd. And paid RS. 276514 @550 persqyd.

50 Sh. Nawang Topgyal S/o Mengu

H.no.27, block -II, New Aruna Nagar Majnu Ka Tila, Civil Lines S.O. North Delhi, Delhi-110054

(A) Plot No. 3478, Sec-IV, 250 sqyd @ 120 per sqyd. (B) 12, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd.

Claimant paid 30000/- as land cost on 12.05.1994 and also paid 7500/- as trasfer fee

Claimant paid 281775/- as development charge in year 1994-95.

Paid 311775/-as land cost/development charge. BBA was exeucted on 24.01.1996 on payment of 282194/- for Plot no. 12, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd @ 975 per sqyd.

Paid land cost 123008/- for plot size 289.43 sqyd @425 er sqyd. and paid development charge 159186/- @ 550 sqyd.

51 Smt. Kasturi Dutta W/o Sh. Ashish Dutta

H.No. 182, National Media Center, Gurgaon, Distt- Gurgaon

a) 1287, Sec-III, Part-I, 256 sqyd. @ 100 b) F-78, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards (94)

Booked plot on 30.11.1986 and paid 73200/- as land cost upto 1994.

Paid 12500/- as development charge in 1992 and also paid 138398/- as additional land cost/development charge in 1994.

Paid 224098/- as land cost/development charge upto 1994. BBA executed on 26.08.1996 for Plot No. F-78, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards @ 975 on payment of 282194/- which includes a rebate of 36346/-

Paid 159187/- as development charge for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @ 550 per sqyd. and also paid 86662/- as land cost @ 425 per sqyd. after excluding rebate of 36346/-.

52 Sh. Ram Dularay S/o Sukh Ram

19/90, Trilok Puri, Delhi- 91

a) 13, PH-II, 250 sqyd. @ 170 per sqyd. b) 67, Block-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards C) I-14, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 31.03.1998 and paid 32650/- as land cost upto 1993.

Paid 27250/- as development charge in 1994 and also paid 120194/- as additional land cost/development charge in 1995.

Paid 180094/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. BBA executed on 18.06.1996 for Plot No. I-14, 289.43 Sq. Yards @ 975 on payment of 282194/-.

Paid 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @ 425 per sqyd. and also paid 159186/- as development charge @ 550 per sqyd.

ANNEXURE –II

Sr. No.

Name of Claimant

Address Details of plot no., area (sqyd.) rate/ phase / Block

Details of booking / land cost

Details of Development charge

Total amount paid /Details of Builder Buyer Agreement/Saledeed if any etc.

Findings /Remarks

1 Smt. Renu Malhotra D/o Sh. G.D Chaudhary

557, Block-C, New Friends Colony, Sriniwaspuri East of Kailash, PH-I, South Delhi-110065

1) 1154, Block-III/I/B, 250 sqyd. @130 (1987) 2) 76, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 31-01-1987 on payment of Rs. 3000/- and paid Rs. 32500/- as land cost up to 15-03-1991.

Paid Rs. 82250/-between 09-07-1992 to 30-01-1993 as development charge and also paid Rs. 58422/-as land cost/ development charge for Plot no-76 Block-D, Phase-I,289.43 sqyd.

Renu Malhotra booked plot area 250 sqyd @130 per sqyd. on 31-1-1987 . Plot no. Plot no. was m,ention as 1154 in receipt dt. 15-05-1987.land cost was paid between 1987 in 1991/1994 and 95222 as develop chargeds between 1992-1994. plot no. D-76, Block D ph-I area 289.03 syd. mention in receipt 30-06-1994 onward. Total amount was paid 173,172/-

Claimant paid RS. 37626/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @130 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 135546/- as part development charge.

2 Sh. Rajinder Kumar S/o Sh. Remal Dass

E-1st/222, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi-110024

3526, 3527, 3528,(100 sqyd each) Sec-III/I, 300 sqyd.(1990)@150 per sqyd.

Booked plot on 16-01-1988 and paid Rs. 45000/- upto 04-06-1990.

Paid Rs. 80000/- as development charge in year 1995.

Paid Rs. 125000/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1995.

Claimant paid RS. 45000/- as land cost for plot size 300 sqyd. @150 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 80000/- as part development charge.

3 Smt. Balwinder Kaur Duggal W/o Sh. Ravinder Singh Duggal

H.No. 176, 3rd Floor, Sandesh Vihar, Pitampura, New Delhi- 110034

A)3309, area 252 sqyd @150 per sqyd. B)F- 86, Ph-I, area 263.12 sqyd.

Booked plot on 14-11-1987 and paid Rs. 36700/- as land cost.

Paid Rs. 82250/- as Development charges in year 1992-1993. Claimant also paid Rs. 119824/- as land cost/ development charge in 1994 -1996.

Paid Rs. 238774/- as land cost/ developmnet charge. Sh. Harpal Puri appeared on behalf of claiment S/o Lt. Sh. Harjeet Singh Puri, produced the copy of death certificate . BBA was executed on 17-11-1994 in favour of Sh. Harjeet Singh Puri for the plot no. 86 , F area 220 sqmeter. @975 after payment

Claimant paid Rs. 111826/- as land cost @425 per sqyd. and paid part development charge . For plot size 263.12 sqyd.

of Rs. 239574/- Developer executed the sale ded in favour of Sh. Harjeet singh for the plot no. F-86, phase -I area 263.12 sqyd on payment of Rs. 239584/- vide sale deed dated 4079 dated 2-07-1996. claiment has also produced builder letter dt 11-03-2000 for handing over the possession of the same plot/ area . As per receipt dt 17-11-1994 polt no changet to 86 block F arae 263.12 sqyd. Sh. Harpal Singh Puri S/o Lt. Sh. Harjeet Singh Puri executed transfer deed in favour of Smt. Balwinder Kumar Duggal W/o Sh. Ravinder Duggal vide deed no. 5264 dt. 30-07-2018.

4 Lt. C P.C. Gulariya S/o Sh. T.R. Gularita through GPA Sh. Sanjay Goyal S/o Sh. Moti Ram

1)C-5/175, Yamuna Vihar , Delhi, 2) Village Datoli, PO Lanj Tehsil & District Kangra (HP) 176026

E-20. Ph-I, 289.43 sqyd. Booked plot on 23-12-1994 on payment of Rs. 245893/-

Paid Rs. 245893/- as land cost/ development charge.

Paid Rs. 245893/- as land cost/ development charge also paid Rs. Rs. 27945/- as statutary fee on 27-03-1999. BBA executed on 6-02-1995 for plot no. 20 block E area 289.43 sqyd. @975 per sqyd. on payment of Rs. 245893/- Developer executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 238686/- in favour of Sh. P.C. Gulariya Vide deed no. 12798 dt. 19-03-1996.

Claimant paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost @425 per sqyd. and paid part development charge for plot size 289.43 sqyd.

5 Sh. Baijnath Singh S/o Sh. Mahawal Singh

H.No. F-182AA, Ground Floor, Near Sethi Dharamsala,

a) 4849, 100/250 sqyd. @110 per sqyd. B)D-71, Ph-1,289.43 Sq.

Claimant paid Rs. 27500/- as land cost on 10-09-1992 and Rs. 7500 as transfer fee on

Paid 82225/- as development charge in year 1993.

Paid Rs. 279532/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. BBA was executed on 11-

Paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @425

mangal Bazar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi,

Yards 10-09-1992. Claiament paid 119885/- as additional land cost/ development charge in year 1994-95.

05-1995 for plot no. 71 block D area 289.43 sqyd @975 on payment of 249610/- Saledeed of plot no. 71 block -D,area 289.43 sqyd. was executed by developer on payment of Rs. 249610/- vide deed no. 2973 dated 10-06-1996.

per sqyd and paid Rs. 156524/- as part development charge.

6 Late Sh. G.D Pehwal S/o Sh. Madhav Lal Pehwal

B-64, Akash Ganga Aptts, Plot no. 17, Sector-6, Dwarka, Delhi- 110075,

a) 3880, S-I, 200 sqyd. @90 per sqyd. B)114, Block-K, Ph-II,324.71 Sq. Yards.

Booked plot on 1-6-1993 on payment of 17500/- and also paid 6000/- as transfer fee.

Paid 88800 /- as development charge in year 1993-1995.

Paid Rs. 106300/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. As per photocopies of receipt representative of claimant informed that original receipt are misplaced. Developer executed the saledeed of the plot no.114 block A area 324.71 sqyd. On payment of 176400/- vide deed no. 26205 dated 26-02-2008.

Paid Rs. 29224/- as land cost @90 per sqyd. for plot size 324.71 sqyd and paid Rs.147176/- as part development charge.

7 Smt. Suchitra Dua W/o Sh. R.K. Dua

M-32, Block -M, Jalvayu Vihar, Sector -25. Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh-201301

a) 2288, S-III/I , 200 sqyd.@120 per sqyd. b) 56, block I area 430.2 sqyd. Phase-II

Booked plot on 17-11-1993 on payment of 24000/- as land cost and also paid RS. 6000/- as transfer fee.

Paid Rs. 65000/- as development charge on 11-11-1995.

Paid Rs. 89000/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995. As per developer letter dated 17-12-1994 plot upto 263 sqyd was allotted @975 per sqyd. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 56, block I area 430.2 sqyd. Phase-II on payment 297630/- vide deed no. 26342 dt. 26-02-2008.

Paid Rs. 182835/- as land cost @425 per sqyd. for plot size 430.2 sqyd and paid Rs.114795- as part development charge.

8 Sh. Gian Chand Gupta S/o Late Sh. Daulat Ram

H.No. 286, Secor- 8, Panchkula- 134109,

3386/3387, Sector-1,200 + 200(400) Sq Yards@180 per sqyd.

Booked plot on 9-04-1988 on payment of Rs. 4000/- and also paid Rs. 32400/- as land cost on 23-05-1989. As per developer letter dated 21-12-

Claimant paid Rs. 52500/- as development charge in 1993.

Paid Rs. 142900/- as land cost/ development charge.

Claimant paid Rs. 72000/- as land cost for plot size 400 sqyd. @ 180 per sqyd. and paid

1993 claimant has deposited full cost of these two residential plots. Claimant also enclosed receipt of one more plot i.e. 3555, 250 sqyd. Claimant has deposited 54000/- as land cost for this plot also and informed that thedeveloper had considered one plot only against three plots after direction from DTCP, Haryana dated 15-01-2009.

70900/- as part development charges.

9 Sh. Gitam Singh Solanki & Sh. Kuber Singh Solanki Ss/o Late Sh. Ganga Ram Solanki

H.No. 2262, Sector- 28, HBC, Faridabad,

(a) 1276, 252 sqyd @100 per sqyd. (b)E-22, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Booked plot on 11-12-1986 and paid Rs. 25500/- as land cost upto 1991.

Paid Rs. 82250/- as developement charge upto 1994 and also paid RS.140875/-as land cost/ development charge upto 1996 .

Paid RS. 248625/- as land cost/ developemnt charge. As per claimant BBA not executed.

Paid Rs. 123008/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd. @425 per sqyd. and paid Rs125617/- as part development charge.

10 Smt. Sushma Gupta W/o Sh. Parmod Gupta (original allottee Sh. Om Prakash Chotani)

H.No. 632, Sector- 21A, Faridabad,

(a) 2323, S-IV,100 sqyd.@150 per sqyd. (b)102, type-B, 107.6 sqyd, (c) A-51, Ph-I,406.64 Sq. Yards

Claimant paid Rs. 15000/- as land cost in year 1992 against plot no. 2323 area 100 sqyd. Claimant also paid Rs. 3000 as transfer fee on 29-02-1992

Paid Rs. 59900/- as development charges in year 1992-1996. As per application of Sh. Om Prakash dated 25-10-1999 addressed to DTCP, Haryana he had send a demand draft no. 676716 dated 25-10-1999 of amount Rs. 24260/-

Paid Rs.99160/- as land cost/development charge. Plot no. changed to 102 area 107.6 sqyd. as per receipt dated 23-01-1996. Developer executed sale deed on plot no. 51, block A, Ph-I area 406.64 sqyd. on payment of 284648/- in favour of Sh. Om Prakash Chotani vide deed no. 5936 dated21-07-2010 which shows that who further executed saledeed on payment of RS. 1200000/- in favour of Smt.Sushma Gupta W/o Sh.

Claimant paid Rs. 172822/- as land cost for plot size 406.64 sqyd. @425 per sqyd. and paid Rs.111826/- as part development charge.

Parmod Gupta vide deed no. 15197 dated 20-01-2011.

11 Smt. P. Rajeswari W/o Sh. Sesha Sai Prasad Palaparthy

Flat no. 401, H.No. 6-1-69/1, GKR Mansion, Saifabad, Hyderabad-500004, Telangana

(a) 211, block B, sector -II area 252 sqyd @90 per sqyd. (b) E-15, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Claimant booked plot on 31-10-1986 and paid 22680/- upto 23-12-1988.

Paid Rs.82908/- as development charge in year 1992-1993. Claimant also paid RS. 16521/- as land cost/ development charge in year 1994.

Paid Rs. 122109/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1994.

Claimant paid Rs. 26049/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd . @90 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 96060/- as part development charge.

12 Sh. P. Mohan krishna S/o Sh. P.M Sarma

Flat no. 306, Varun Sargam Villa, Somajiguda, Hyderabad- 500082

(a) 212,block B, Sector-II, 252 Sqyd @90 per sqyd. (b)E-7, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Claimant booked plot on 31-10-1986 and paid 22680/- upto 23-12-1988.

Paid Rs.82908/- as development charge in year 1992-1993. Claimant also paid RS. 16521/- as land cost/ development charge in year 1994.

Paid Rs. 122109/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1994.

Claimant paid Rs. 26049/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd . @90 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 96060/- as part development charge.

13 Dr. V.M.P Rao S/o Late Sh. Dr. V.V.R Sarma

H.No. 3-11-116/19, Sri Sai Gardens, Near TV Studio, Ramanthapur, Hyderabad-500013

(a) 213, block B, Sector-II, 252 Sqyd @90 per sqyd. (b) E-49, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Claimant booked plot on 31-10-1986 and paid 22680/- upto 23-12-1988.

Paid Rs.82908/- as development charge in year 1992-1993. Claimant also paid RS. 16521/- as land cost/ development charge in year 1994.

Paid Rs. 122109/- as land cost/ development charge upto 1994.

Claimant paid Rs. 26049/- as land cost for plot size 289.43 sqyd . @90 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 96060/- as part development charge.

14 Smt. Kalawati Rana W/o Ranjeet Singh Rana

Flat no. 81, Panchdeep Apartments, Block-D, Vikas Puri, New Delhi- 110018

2043/44, Sec-II, 200x2 =400 sqyd.@120 per sqyd.

claimant booked plot on 29-06-1989 on payment of 3862/- for plot size 400 sqyd. and also paid Rs. 48000/- and Rs. 1275/- as land cost in 1992-96.

Claimant paid 235677/- as development charge during 1992-1996.

Paid 288814/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. As per receipt dated 2-03-1996 plot no. changed to 89 area 150.69 sqyd. and as per letter dated 21-08-1995 one more plot i.e. K-1 area 239.20 sqyd. was offered. As per claimant she did not gave any consent for change of plot.

Claimant paid Rs. 68814 /- as land cost for plot size 400 sqyd.@172 per sqyd. and paid Rs. 220000@550 per sqyd. Keeping in view BBA executed in all general category plots

wherein land cost has been charged @425 per sqyd the claimant paid 170000/- as land cost @425 per sqyd and paid 118814/- as part development charge.

15 Smt. Usha Singh W/o Sh. Lt. Gaj Raj Singh

Plot no. 22, Pocket-2, 3rd Floor, Jasola Vihar, New Delhi- 110025,

a) 114, area 200 sqyd, Ph-II @80 per sqyd. b) 3047, area 200 sqyd. c)B-107, Ph-I,468.83 Sq. Yards

Sh. Ajay Anand booked plot on 5-09-1991 and paid Rs. 16000/- as land cost. Claimant also produced photo copy of payment made by Sh. Rajbir Singh and Smt. Santosh who paid RS. 24000/- as land cost in 1994. There is no refreence with regard to transfer of plot in favour of the claimant but as per the claimant at the time of registration, developer hand over these payment receipt to her while making one plot.

Paid Rs.195684/- as development charge in year 1997. As per photo copy of receipt Sh. Rajbir Singh and Smt. Santosh paid 224000/- as development charge in year 1997.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-107, ph-I area 468.83 sqyd. On payment of Rs. 281290/- in favour of Smt. Usha Singh and Smt. Nirmala Thakur vide deed no. 3004 dated 9-06-2004.

Paid Rs. 199253/- as land cost for plot size 468.83 sqyd @425 per sqyd. and paid part development charge.

16 Sh. Babu Lal S/o Sh. Harikishan

W2 49 80 Yards, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi- 18

a). 628-31 S-II, 400 sqyd, @ Rs. 90 per sqyd(1986).

Booked plot on dated 31-10-1986 and paid Rs. 36000/- as land cost upto 1991.

Paid development charge Rs.7000/- in 1992 .

Paid Rs. 43000/- as land cost/development charge upto 1992. Sh. Babu lal booked plot area 400 sqyd @90 per sqyd , block B sec-II on 31-10-1986 and also paid 1000/- as transfer cost.

Claimant paid part land cost/ development charge for plot size 400 sqyd.

ANNEXURE –III

Sr. No.

Name of Claimant Address Details of plot no., area (sqyd.) rate/ phase / Block

Details of booking / land cost Details of Development charge

Total amount paid /Details of Builder Buyer Agreement/Saledeed if any etc.

Findings /Remarks

1 Sh. Ashok Bhagwandas Vazirani S/o Sh. Bhagwandas Vazirani & Sh. Narain Pitamberdas Kaku S/o Pitamberdas Kaku

Opp. I.I.P.S. 501, Aastha 1, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, T.F Deonar S.O, T.F Donar Mumbai Maharashtra - 400088

65, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer exeucted saledeed on plot no. 65, block D area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of Rs. 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ashok B Vazirani and Sh. Narain P Kaku vide deed no. 11277 dated 26-10-2005.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

2 Mrs. Khushboo Khandelwal D/o Sh. S.S Khandelwal

395/14, Faridabad.

100-A, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 100-A, block-D, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-I, on payment of 173658/- vide deed no. 3061 dated 31.05.2005. Physical possession of plot was taken over by claiment.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

3 Smt. Babita Goel W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar Goel

809, Sector-37, Faridabad

100-C, Block-D, PH-I, 281.80 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 100-C, block-D, area 281.80 sqyd, PH-I, on payment of 169080/- vide deed no. 3059 dated 31.05.2005. Physical possession of plot was taken over by claiment.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

4 Mrs. Sunita Rani W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Mrs. Sulochna Devi W/o Sh. Girish Pal & Mrs.

RZ-553, Gali No. 21, Tugalkabad Extension, New Delhi-110019

77, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

As per the document produce saledeed of plot no.77, Block I , 289.43 sqyd., ph-II was executed on payment 188130/- vide registry no. 26440 dated 26-02-2008 in favour of

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale

Kanta Garg W/o Sh. Naresh Kumar through Sh. Pawan Kr.

Smt. Shakhlesh W/o Sh.Ranbir , who further executed saledeed in favour of Sunita Rani , Smt. Sulochna and Smt. kanta garg vide saleded no. 3226 dated 08-05-2008 on payment of RS. 1073000/-

receipt with him. deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

5 Smt. Kamaljeet Kaur Mokha W/o Sh. G.P.S Mokha & Smt. Sarveen Kaur Duggal W/o Sh. Kuldeep Singh Duggal

J-5, Gangaram Vatika Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110018

87, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 87, block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-II, on payement of 188130/- vide deed no. 26377 dated dated 26.02.2008 in favour of Smt. Saraswati, who further exeucted sale deed in favour of Smt. kamaljeet kaur & Smt. Surveen Kaur on payment of 250000/- vide deed no. 4310 dated 20.05.2008.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

6 Smt. Sarveen Kaur Duggal W/o Sh. Kuldeep Singh Duggal

J-5, Gangaram Vatika Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110018

226, Block-B, PH-I, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 226, block-B, area 418.6 sqyd, PH-I, on payement of 251160/- vide deed no. 1515 dated 05-05-2005 in favour of Smt. Surveen Kaur.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

7 Smt. Santosh Kumari Jain W/o Late Sh. A.P Jain

18, Near Duggal Narshing Home Mukesh Colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad.

81, Block-F, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 81 block F area 289.43 sqyd. in favour of Smt. Santosh Kumari Jain W/o Late Sh. A.P Jain vide deed no. 1159 dated 27-04-2004.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

8 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash -

31, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 31, Block I, area 289.43, PH-

No separate details available

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi

1, Greater Kailash, South Delhi - 110048

II, on payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23104 dated 22.01.2008 in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi S/o Sh. Laxmi Narayan Rastogi

except the amount recorded in sale deed.

receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

9 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi & Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

110, Block-D, area 289.43 sqyd., PH-I .

Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 110, Block-D, area 289.43, PH-I, on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Sushila Rastogi & Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi vide deed no. 12327 dated 14.11.2005.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

10 Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi & Sh. Sameer Rastogi S/o Sh. Santosh Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

49, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 49, Block-E, area 289.43, PH-I, on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Sushila Rastogi & Sh. Sameer Rastogi S/o Sh. Santosh Rastogi vide deed no. 10200 dated 13.10.2005.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

11 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

32, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 32, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-II, on payemnt of 168288/- vide deed no. 15704 dated 24.03.2005 in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

12 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

28, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 28, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-II, on payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23102 dated 22.01.2008 in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

13 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

1, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 1, Block-E, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-I, on payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 10000 dated 20.08.2007 in favour of Sh. Y.K Bansal who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi on payment of 434145/- vide deed no. 14166 dated 16.10.2007.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

14 Sh. Santosh Rastogi & Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

108, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 108, Block-D, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-I, on payement of 173658/- vide deed no. 10199 dated 13.10.2005 in favour of Smt. Sushila Rastogi & Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

15 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

30, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 30, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-I, on payement of 188130/- vide deed no. 23105 dated 22.01.2008 in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of

Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

16 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi through Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

29, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 29, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-II, on payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23103 dated 22.01.2008 in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

17 Sh. Sachin Rastogi S/o Sh. S.K Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048

6, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 6, Block-I, area 289.43 sqyd, PH-II, on payment of 125000/- vide deed no. 25447 dated 15.02.2008 in favour of Sh. Sachin Rastogi S/o Santosh Kumar Rastogi

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

18 Smt. Rashmi Garg W/o Sh. Mohan Lal

1437, Sector-7E, Faridabad

66, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 66 , Block-D, 289.42 sqyd ph-I on payment of RS.. 173658/- in favour of Sh. Pardeep Batra S/o Sh. R.L. Batra vide saledeed no. 2229/21-05-2004 who further through GPA Smt. Nisha Gupta vide document no. 523/ 21-02-2006/ SPA Sh. Mahender Kr. And Sh. Raj Kr. Vide document no. 23 /8-10-2007 executed sale deed of plot no. 66, D in favour of Smt. Rashmi Garg W/o Mohan Lal on payment of 300000/- 9348/17-07-2008 .

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

19 Smt. Rama Wadhwa W/o Sh. J.K Wadhwa

WZ-214, 3rd Floor, Street No. 14, Block-G, Hari Nagar, Janakpuri, B-1, S.O. West Delhi-110058

22, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer exeucted sale deed in favour of Smt. Rama Wadhwa for plot no. 22, block-I, area 289.43 sqyd Ph-II, on payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 11553 dated 10.09.2007.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

20 Smt. Santosh Kumari Jain W/o Sh. A.P Jain

18, Near Duggal Nursing Home Mukesh Colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad.

91, Block-F, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 91 block F area 289.43 sqyd. in favour of Smt. Santosh Kumari Jain W/o Late Sh. A.P Jain vide deed no. 1158 dated 27-04-2004.

No separate details available except the amount recorded in sale deed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except sale deed. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt with him.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

21 Lt. Smt. Anita Devi W/o Sh. Harish Chand Gaur through Sh. Lal Krishan Gaur

1/7733, Gali No. 1, East Gorakh Park, Shahdara, East Delhi-110032

34, Block-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed on payment of RS. 125000/- vide deed no. 25479 dated 15-02-2008 in favour of Sh. Vikas Goel S/o Sh. Narinder Goel who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Anita Devi on payment of 290000/- vide deed no. 10067 dated 25-07-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

22 Smt. Nirmal Garg W/o Vinod Garg

40/20, 2nd Floor, Chittaranjan Park, South Delhi-110019

64, Block-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed on payment of RS.125000/- vide deed no. 25478 dated 15-02-2008 in favour of Sh. Brijesh Kumar Gupta who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Nirmal Garg vide deed no. 3525 dated 12-05-2008.

No seprate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of

Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

23 Smt. Kamla Gupta W/o Sh. Lajpat Rai Gupta

165, Deepali Enclave, Saraswati Vihar, Pitampura, North West Delhi-110034

63, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer exeuted saledeed in favour of Smt. Madhu for plot no. i-63 ph-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs. 188130/- vide deed no. 26360 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. kamla gupta on payment of Rs. 290000/- vide deed no. 3526 dated 12-05-2008.

No seprate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

24 Sh. Rishi Behaki S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand through Sh. Hawa Singh

RZ-22/A, Block-E, Prem Nagar, Najafgarh, South West, Delhi-110043

25, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed on payment of Rs.188130 vide deed no. 11552 dated 10-09-2007 in favour of Sh. Rishi Behaki S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand who further executed agreement in favour of Sh. Hawa Singh.

No seprate detail available except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

25 Sh. Jagdish Kumar S/o Sh. Atma Ram

J-1/221, DDA Flats, Kalkaji, Ali South Delhi-110019

15, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 15, block I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs.173658/- vide deed no. 2745 dated 26-05-2005 in favour of Sh. Jagdish Gill ( Surname type wrongly in registry)

No separate detail available except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

26 Smt. Henna Vij D/o Lov Kumar Vij

1243, Sector-14, Faridabad

73, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 73 block I area 289.43 sqyd. Ph-II on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Yoginder Kr. S/o Rajinder Kr. Vide deed no. 26335/26-02-2008

No separate detail available except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning

who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Kumari Henna Vij D/o L.K. Vij on 4,00,000/- vide deed no. 1579 /16-04-2008.

have any payment receipt.

that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

27 Sh. Shankar Chatterjee S/o Sh. P.N Chatterjee

2231, Housing Board Colony, Sector-28, Faridabad

53, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-53 area 289.43 sqyd. Ph-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Shankar chatarjee S/o B.M. Chatarjee vide deed no. 1221/ 28-04-2005.Possession of this plot was taken over by claimant (date not mentioned.)

No separate detail available except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

28 Sh. Shripati Pandey S/o Sh. Shivpujan Pandey & Sh. Srikant Pandey S/o Sh. Shripati Pandey

206, Ashoka Enclave-I, Sector-34, Faridabad

81, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 81 block D area 289.43 sqyd. Ph-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Shripati Pandey S/o Sh. Shivpujan Pandey & Sh. Srikant Pandey S/o Sh. Shripati Pandey vide deed no. 5887/ 27-07-2005.

No separate detail available except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fraudulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

29 Sh. Pawan Gupta S/o Jagan Nath

553/21, Gali No. 21, Tughlakabad, Extb, Delhi-110019

106, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 106 block D area 289.43 sqyd. Ph-I on payment of Rs.173658/- in favour of Smt. Chavi Jain vide deed no. 799 dated 20-04-2005 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Raj Rani Sharma on payment of Rs. 10,71000/- vide deed no. 7443 dated 17-07-2007 who furtehr executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Pawan Kumar and sh. Anil Kumar on payment of 10,71000/- vide deed no.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

24732 dated 12-02-2008.

30 Ms.Tushara Pillai D/o Sh. Gopalakrishnan PC

507, New Delhi Apartments, Vasundhara Enclave, Delhi-110096

69, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 69 block D area 289.43 sqyd. ph-I on amount of 173658/- in favour of Ms. Tusara pille vide deed no. 10201 dated 13-10-2005.Physical posession of plot was offered to claiment in November 2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

31 Sh. Dinesh Sareen S/o D.K Sareen

2144, Housing Board Colony, Near Opp. Geeta Nursing home, Sector-28, Faridabad

86, Block-D, PH-I, 289.40 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 86 block D area 289.40 sqyd. ph-I on amount of 173640/- in favour of Sh. Dinesh Sareen S/o Sh. D.K. Sareen vide deed no. 14785 dated 11-03-2005.Physical posession of plot was offered to claiment in March 2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

32 Smt. Bimla Devi W/o Sh. Dinesh Kumar

339/1, Ward no. 7, Narwana Distt. Jind (HR)

58, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 58 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 125000/- in favour of Sh. Dheeraj Mangla S/o Sh. Raj Kumar Mangla vide deed no. 25659 dated 18-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of the plot in favour of Smt. Bimla Devi W/o Sh. Dinesh Kumar on payment of Rs. 275000/- vide deed no. 1169 dated 22-04-2009.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed sale deed fradulently while mentioning that the sale deed has been executed in compliance of Supreme Court order dated 23.11.2000

33 Smt. Angoori Devi W/o Sh. Jagdish Rai

B-37, Jawahar Park, Khanpur, Devli Road, New Delhi-110062

76, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 76 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Mamta W/o Sh. Kawar Pal vide deed no. 26337 dated 26-02-2008 who further

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

executed saledeed of the plot in favour of Smt. Angoori Devi W/o Sh. Jagdish Rai on payment of Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 5287 dated 2-06-2008.

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

34 Sh. Pankaj Buttan S/o Sh. Gyan Chand Buttan

A-51, Pink Apartment, Paschim Vihar, West Delhi-110063

38, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 38 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 188129/- in favour of Sh. Pankaj Buttan S/o Sh. Gyan Chand Buttan vide deed no. 15564 dated 05-11-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

35 Smt. Chandni Hans W/o Sh. Puneet Kumar

2280, 2nd Floor, Raja Park, Shakur Basti, Delhi.

57, Block-I, PH-II, 282.80 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 57 block I area 282.80 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 183820/- in favour of Smt. Chandni Hans vide deed no. 26343 dated 22-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

36 Sh. Rajesh Malhotra S/o V.K Malhotra

B-13, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, Defence Colony, Delhi-110048

24, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 24 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Rajesh Malhotra S/o V.K Malhotra vide deed no. 23838 dated 29-01-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

37 Sh. Rajesh Malhotra S/o V.K Malhotra

B-13, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash Enclave-II, Defence Colony, Delhi-110048

20, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed for plot no. 20 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on amount of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Rajesh Malhotra S/o V.K Malhotra vide deed no. 23842

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

dated 29-01-2008. have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

38 Smt. Bhupender Kaur W/o Sh. Sher Singh

J/116, Sector-10-D, DLF, Faridabad.

84, Block-F, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 84 block F area 289.43 sqyd. ph-I on amount of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Vinay Jain vide deed no. 3364 dated 6-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kamlesh Goel on payment of 1071000/- vide deed no. 7498 dated 18-07-2007 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Bhupender Kaur W/o Sh. Sher Singh vide deed no. 25381 dated 15-02-2008 on payment of 1135500/-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

39 Sh. Asit Kumar Jash S/o Fanindra Nath Jash

A-25, City APT, Vasundhara Enclave, Delhi- 96

85, Block-D, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 85 block D area 289.43 sqyd. ph-I on amount of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Asit Kumar Jash S/o Fanindra Nath Jash vide deed no. 6065 dated 1-08-2005. Physical possession was offered to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

40 Sh. Pankaj Chaudhary S/o Ganga Singh & Smt. Santosh Chabbra W/o Sh. Narender Kumar

1256, Sector- 28, Faridabad

80, Block-D, PH-I, 289.4 sqyd.

Developer exeucted sale deed of plot no. D-80, area 289.4 sqyd, PH-I, on payment of 173640/- in favour ofSh. Pankaj Chaudhary S/o Ganga Singh & Smt. Santosh Chabbra W/o Sh. Narender Kumar vide deed no. 14783 dated 11.03.2005, physical possession of plot was taken over on 28.03.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

41 Smt. Rachna W/o 1256, Sector- 28, 21, Block-E, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Sh. Pankaj Chaudhary & Smt. Santosh W/o Narender Kumar

Faridabad PH-I, 289.60 sqyd.

plot no. 21 block-E, Ph-I area 289.6 sqyd. PH-I on amount of 173660/- in favour of Smt. Ashu Arora vide deed no. 53970 dated 18.07.2005 who further executed saledeed of the plot in favour of Sh. Ajay Sharma & Smt. Priyanka Sharma on payment of Rs. 232000/- vide deed no. 1116 dated 30.04.2007, who through GPA further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Neelam Garg W/o Sh. Pawan on payment of 350000/- vide deed no. 7293 dated 24.06.2008. Smt. Neelam Garg further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rachna W/o Sh. Pankaj Chaudhary & Smt. Santosh W/o Narender Kumar on payment of 500000/- vide deed no. 8335 dated 10.09.2010. Possession was handed over on 18.05.2007.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

42 Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. S.C Dhupra

H.No. 486, Sector- 8, Faridabad

116 Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 116 Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd. on amount of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Amit Pujara S/o Sh. Suraj Prakash Pujara vide deed no. 5162 dated 13.07.2005 whothrough GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. S.C Dhupra on payment of 1318350/- vide deed no. 1049 dated 27.04.2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

43 Sh. Mukesh Chand Arora S/o Sh. K.L

5786/7, Jawahar Nagar, New

42, Block-D, Ph-I, 418.6

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 42, Block-D, PH-I area 418.6

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Arora Chandrawal, Delhi-7

sqyd. sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Chand Arora S/o K.L Arora vide deed no. 2028 dated 21.05.2004.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt. Physical possession of plot was taken over by claimant.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

44 Ms. Varsha Khanna D/o K.R Malhotra

1, Adarsh Nagar, Rishikesh- 249201, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

69, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd.

Paid 188130/- as land cost/development charge on 30.04.2001.

Paid 188130/- as land cost/development charge on 30.04.2001.

Claimant produced payment receipt except dated 30.04.2001. Development executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Ms. Versha Khanna D/o K.R Malhotra of plot no. 69, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. On payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23837 dated 29.01.2008. Physical possession of plot was taken over by the claimant .

Sale deed executed and payment made after cut off date . The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

45 Sh. V.N Khanna S/o Sh. P.L Khanna

01, Adarsh Nagar, Rishikesh- 249201, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

66, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 30.04.2001 on payment of 188130/-

Paid 188130/- as land cost/development charge on 30.04.2001.

Claimant produced payment receipt except dated 30.04.2001. Developer executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. V.N Khanna S/o Sh. P.L Khanna of plot no. 66, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. On payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23839

Sale deed executed and payment made after cut off date . The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

dated 29.01.2008. Physical possession of plot was taken over by the claimant

46 Sh. V.N Khanna S/o Sh. P.L Khanna

01, Adarsh Nagar, Rishikesh- 249201, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

67, Block-I, Ph-II,289.43 sqyd.

Booked plot on 30.04.2001 on payment of 188130/-

Paid 188130/- as land cost/development charge on 30.04.2001.

Claimant produced payment receipt except dated 30.04.2001. Development executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Versha Khanna D/o K.R Malhotra of plot no. 67, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. On payment of 188130/- vide deed no. 23840 dated 29.01.2008. Physical possession of plot was taken over by the claimant

Sale deed executed after cut off date . The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

47 Sh. Ashish Gupta S/o Sh. V.K. Gupta

H.No. 34, Sector- 18A, Faridabad- 121002

49, Block-C, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd.

Developer through GPA Sh. Raj Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Swroop through GPA documents no. 4 dated 3-05-2001 of plot no. C-46,47,48,49 measuring 502x4 sqyd. executed saledeed of plot no. 49, Block-C, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd. on amount of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Hukum Chand S/o Puran Chand Goyal vide deed no. 16037 dated 12.01.2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Ashish Gupta S/o V.K Gupta on payment of 600000/- vide deed no. 5593 dated 20.06.2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

48 Sh. Kirpal Dutt Bhatt S/o Sh. Ganga Dutt Bhatt

1/25, Ground Floor, Park- Elite Floors, Sector- 84, Faridabad

109, Block-D, Ph-I, 289 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 109, Block-D, Ph-I, 289 sqyd. on amount of 173400/- in favour of Sh. Kirpal Dutt Bhatt S/o Sh. Ganga Dutt Bhatt vide deed no. 363 dated 08.04.2004.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

49 Sh. Gaurav Dhawan S/o Sh. K.L Dhawan

1322, Sector- 17, Khaeri Kalan, Haryana, 121002

14, Block-E, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 14, Block-E, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Vijay Singh Chauhan S/o Sh. Diggaj Singh Chauhan vide deed no. 6535 dated 09.08.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Amar Singh S/o Ram Singh on payment of 868000/- vide deed no. 18631 dated 22.02.2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ritu A Pahwa Dhawan W/o Sh. Gaurav Dhawan & Sh. Gaurav Dhawan on payment of 1071000/- vide deed no. 27000 dated 04.03.2008. Physical possession handed over by developer.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

50 Sh. Anuj Jain S/o Sh. R.C Jain through GPA Sh.Arun Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Jai Kishan

H.No. 897, Sector-9, Faridabad.

104C, Block-D, Ph-I, 297.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 104C, Block-D, Ph-I 297.32 sqyd. on payment of 178392/- in favour of Sh. Anuj Jain S/o Sh. R.C Jain vide deed no. 15280 dated 18.03.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

51 Sh. Vijay Pal S/o Sh. Man Singh

Village- Bhensrawali, Tehsil-Dayalpur, Distt- Faridabad

78, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 78, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Vijay Pal S/o Sh. Man Singh vide deed no. 26200 dated 26.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

52 Sh. Vijay Pal S/o Sh. Man Singh

Village- Bhensrawali, Tehsil-Dayalpur, Distt- Faridabad

13, Block-F, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 13, Block-F, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Vijay Pal S/o Sh. Man Singh vide deed no. 3075 dated 31.05.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt. Developer hand over possession of plot.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

53 Sh. J.C. Sharma S/o Sh. A.L. Sharma

H.No. A- 1509, Green Field Colony, Faridabad, Haryana

I-53, Ph-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 53 block I area 289.43 sqyd. ph-II on payment of Rs. 183820/- in favour of Sh. Asim Sethi S/o Sh. Gurubaksh lal vide deed no. 26353 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Mayank Aggarwal S/o Sh. Naresh Aggarwal on payment of Rs. 400000/- vide deed no. 708 dated 8-04-2008 who further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Jagdish Chand Sharma S/o Sh. A.L. Sharma on payment of l Rs. 600000/- vide deed no. 5952 dt. 23-08-2013.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

54 Sh. J.C. Sharma S/o Sh. A.L. Sharma

H.No. A- 1509, Green Field

D-104, 297.32 sqyd. Ph-I

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 104 block D area 297.32

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Colony, Faridabad, Haryana

sqyd. ph-I on payment of Rs. 178392/- in favour of Sh. J.C. SharmA S/o A.L. Sharma vide deed no. 15972 dt. 18-03-2005.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

55 Sh. Naresh Kumar Garg S/o Late Sh. O.P Garg and others

H.No. D-277, Nirman Vihar, Delhi- 92

25, Block-A, Ph-I,502 sqyd.

Developer through GPA Sh. Dharmender ( for plot no. A-22, 23, 24,25, 26, 27, 28) measuring 502x7 executed saledeed of plot no. 25 (& 26) Block-A, area 502x2 sqyd. on amount of 301250/- for each plot ( 602500 /2 ) in favour of Smt. Anju Devi W/o Sh. Satish Kumar vide deed no.9837 dated 17-08-2007 who further executed saledeed of plot no. 25, block A in favour of Sh. Manish Aggarwal S/o Lt. Sh. Raj Kishan Aggarwal and Sh. Naresh Kumar Garg S/o Lt. Sh. Om Prakash Garg, Sh. Rakesh Gupta S/o Lt. Sh. Bhagwan Das Gupta and Sh. Raj Kumar s/o Sh. Ram Swroop on amount of Rs. 1858500/- vide deed no. 434 dated 4-04-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

56 Sh. Gaurav Goel S/o Late Sh. R.P Goel

H.No. 299, Ward no. 7, Baniya Wada, Balabgarh, Faridabad, Haryana

89, Block-F, Ph-I, 289.43 sqyd

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 89, Block-F, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Gauvav Goel S/o Late Sh. R.P. Goel vide deed no.12318 dated 14.11.2005. possession handed over by developer on 20-11-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

57 Smt. Santosh H.No. 156, Sector- 84, Block-I, Ph- Developer executed saledeed of plot No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Wadhwa W/o Sh. Harish Chandera Wadhwa

9, Faridabad, Haryana

II,289.43 sqyd. no. 84, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Usha Jain W/o Sh. Ramesh Chand vide deed no. 2312 dt. 22-01-2008 who further executed saleded of thios plot in favour of Smt. Santosh Wadhwa W/o Sh. Harish Chander on payment 250000/- vide deed no. 7784 dt 30-06-2008.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

58 Sh. Geet Wadhwa S/o Sh. Harish Chandra Wadhwa

H.No. 156, Sector- 9, Faridabad, Haryana

88, Block-I, Ph-II,289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 88, Block-I, Ph-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Sushila D/o Sh. B.P. Gupta vide deed no. 24224 dt. 04-02-2008 who further executed saleded of this plot in favour of Sh. Geet Wadhwa S/o Sh. Harish Chander on payment 250000/- vide deed no. 4359 dt 21-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

59 Sh. Harish Wadhwa S/o Late Sh. Mangal Sen Wadhwa

H.No. 156 Sector- 9, Faridabad, Haryana

145, Block-B, Ph-I,418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 145, Block-B, Ph-I, area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Harish Chander S/o Late Sh. Mangal Sen Wadhwa vide deed no. 1228 dt 28-04-2005. Phycical possesion was taken over on 29-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

60 Smt. Santosh Wadhwa W/o Sh. Harish Chandera Wadhwa

H.No. 156, Sector- 9, Faridabad, Haryana

148, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 148, Block-B, Ph-I, area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Santosh Wadhwa W/o Sh. Harish Chander vide deed no. 801 dt 20-04-2005. Phycical

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

possesion was taken over on 21-04-2005.

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

61 Sh. Rajender Mangla S/o Sh. Late Sh. Ramesh Chand Mangla & Sh. Mahender Pratap S/o Late Sh. Ramesh Chand Mangla

H.No. 2164, Sector- 28, Faridabad, Haryana

130, Block-D, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 130, Block-D, area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Rajender Mangla & Sh. Mahender Pratap S/o Late Sh. Ramesh Chand Mangla vide deed no. 2749 dt 26-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

62 Smt.Kamla Devi Mittal W/o Sh. Shyam Lal Mittal

H.No. 63, Ram Vihar, Vikas Marg Extension, Delhi -110092

34, Block-A, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 34, Block-A, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Smt.Kamla Devi Mittal W/o Sh. Shyam Lal Mittal vide deed no. 3041 dt 31-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

63 Sh. Mukesh Mittal S/o Sh. Shyam Lal Mittal

H.No. 63, Ram Vihar, Vikas Marg Extension, Delhi -110092

13, Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 13, Block-B, Ph-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Shyam Lal Mittal vide deed no. 3876 dt 14-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

64 Sh. Narendera Kumar Malra S/o Sh. R.D Malra

H.no.793, Sec-14, Faridabad

7, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 7, Block-I, ph-II,area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Narendera Kumar Malra S/o Sh. R.D Malra vide deed no.9167 dt 09-08-2007.Physical possession was taken over on 3-08-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

65 Sh. Rameshwar Dass Malra S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram Malra

H.no.793, Sec-14, Faridabad

198, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 198, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Rameshwar Dass Malra S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram Malra vide deed no.186 dt 06-04-2005.Physical possession was taken over on 7-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

66 Sh. Anubhav Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Bishan Swaroop Goyal

Flat no. 19, Sweet Home Apartment, Sector- 14, Rohini, Delhi,

B-12, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 12, block B, Ph-1 area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Anubhav Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Bishan Swaroop Goyal vide deed no. 3878 dated 14-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

67 Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jawala Prasad & Sh. Vishal S/o Sh. N.K. Ananad through GPA Sh. Deepak Kumar Mangla S/o Sh. Mahinder Pratap Mangla & Smt. Pushpa Mangla W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar Mangla

(i)239, sector -37 , Faridabad (ii) RZ -115/15, Tuglakabad Extension, New Delhi

B-11, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 11, block B, Ph-1 area 502.32 sqyd. On payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jawala Prasad & Sh. Vishal S/o Sh. N.K. Anand vide deed no. 4243 dated 21-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

68 Smt. Neelam Gupta W/o Sh. Ravinder Gupta through Sh. Rishi Mohan S/o Sh. Madan Mohan

789, sector -14, Faridabad.

I-48, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 48, block I, Ph-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Dinesh S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan vide deed no. 26365 dated 26-02-2008 who further

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

executed saledeed of same plot in favour of Smt. Neelam Gupta W/o Sh. Ravinder Gupta on paymen tof Rs. 231544/- vide deed no. 15662 dated 3-10-2008 who further executed registered GPA in favour of Sh. Rishi Mohan S/o Sh. Madan Mohan.

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

69 Ms. Nidhi Chaudary D/o Sh. S.K. Chaudary through SPA Sh. Madan Mohan S/o Sh. Sewa Ram

499, Sector -7D, Faridabad

I-55, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yard

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 55, block I, Ph-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Kumari Nidhi Chaudary D/o Sh. S.K. Chaudary vide deed no. 26339 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed registered GPA in favour of Sh. Ayush Goyal S/o Sh. Mukesh Goyal who further executed registred SPA in favour of Dr. Madan Mohan S/o Sh. Sewa Ram.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

70 Mansi Khanna Alias Mansi Bhatia D/o Sh. Vishan Narain Khanna

Plot no. 1319, Sector- 15, Faridabad- 121007,

K-112, Ph-II,329.92 Sq. Yards

Claimant paid Rs. 213862/- as land cost/ development charge vide receipt dated 30-04-2001 i.e. after cut-off date.

Claimant paid Rs. 213862/- as land cost/ development charge in 2001.

Paid RS. 213862/- in 2001 as land cost/ development charge. Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 112, block K, Ph-II area 329.92 sqyd. on payment of 213862/- in favour of Mansi Khanna vide deed no. 26341 dated 22-02-2008.

Sale deed executed and payment made after cut off date . The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

71 Sh. Dayanand S/o Sh. Sada Nand

F-12, L.I.C Colony, Dilshaad Garden, Delhi- 110095,

232, Block-B, Ph-I,299 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 232, Block-B, Phase-I area 299 sqyd. on payment of 179400/ - in favour of Sh. Dayanand S/o Sh. Sada

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Nand vide deed no. 6358 dt 23-12-2003. Possession of plot is handed over on 8-02-2004.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

72 Smt. Sonika Jindal W/o Sh. Sandeep Jindal & Smt. Sarla Jindal W/o Sh. Parmod Jindal

H.No. 342, Sector-22, Mujesar, Palwal,

2, Block-F, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 2, block F, Ph-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs.173658 /- in favour of Gaurav Mittal S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad vide deed no. 3562 dated 8-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Sarla Jindal &Smt. Sonika Jindal on payment of Rs. 300000/- vide deed no. 17357 dated 6-02-2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

73 Sh. Gaurav Bajaj S/o Sh. Joginder Paul Bajaj

A- 301, Amarpali Platinum, Sector- 119, Noida- 201301, 289.43 Sq. Yards

E-5, Block-E, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 5, block E, Ph-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs.173760/- in favour of Sh. Atul Bhardwaj & Smt. Nidhi Bhardwaj vide deed no. 7561 dated 31.08.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Sh. Gaurav Bajaj on payment of Rs. 10,70,891/- vide deed no. 22743 dated 16.01.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

74 Sh. Thakar Dass Mendiratta S/o Sh. Jiwan Dass Mendiratta & Sunita Tewatia W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar Tewatia

H.No. 314, Sector- 9, Faridabad, Haryana & H.No. 902, Sector- 09, Karnal, Haryana,

B-149, Ph-I,418.6 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 149, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Thakar Dass Mendiratta S/o Sh. Jiwan Dass Mendiratta & Sunita Tewatia W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar Tewatia vide deed no.15696 dt 24-03-2005.Physical possession was taken over on 29-03-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

75 Sh. Zile Singh H.No. 986, Sector- B-199, Ph- Developer executed saledeed of plot No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Dahiya S/o Late Sh. Subhram Dahiya

15, Faridabad I,418.60 Sq. Yards

no. 199, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Zile Singh Dahiya S/o Late Sh. Subhram Dahiya vide deed no.1922 dt 12-05-2005.Physical possession was taken over on 16-05-2005.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

76 Sh. Mohit Goel S/o Sh. Hukam Chand through GPA Smt. Sushma Mahajan and Smt. Shashi Mahajan

A-1/ 253, Janakpuri, New Delhi, Janakpuri, B-1, West Delhi- 110058,

B-117, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 117, Block-B, ph-I,area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Mohit Goel S/o Sh. Hukam Chand vide deed no.5158 dt 13-07-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

77 Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi S/o Sh. Laxmi Narayan Rastogi

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash 1, Greater Kailash S.O, South Delhi - 110048,

F-19, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 19, Block-F, ph-I,area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi S/o Sh. Laxmi Narayan Rastogi vide deed no.3357 dt 06-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

78 Sh. Kapil Bhatia S/o Sh. R.C Bhatia

64, 65 Mukesh colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad

D-39, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 39, Block-D, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Kapil Bhatia S/o Sh. R.C Bhatia vide deed no. 794 dt . 20-04-2005. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

79 Smt. Veena Goyal W/o Sh. Naresh Goyal

H.No. 350, Sector- 55, Faridabad ,

F-5, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 5, Block-F, ph-I,area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

favour of Smt. Rita Aggarwal W/o Sh. Keshav Aggarwal vide deed no. 3046 dt 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Veena Goyal W/o Sh. Naresh Goyal vide deed no. 12938 dated 24-11-2005 on payment of Rs. 201000/-

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

80 Smt. Priyanka Jain W/o Sh. Narender Jain

H.No. C-60, Shakti Nagar Extension, New Delhi,

39, Block-I, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 39, Block-I, ph-II,area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188129/- in favour of Sh. Jagdish Chand vide deed no. 15562 dt 5-11-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Priyanka Jain W/o Sh. Narender Jain vide deed no. 6041 dated 26-08-2013 on payment of Rs. 43,42,500/-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

81 Sh. Rajinder Jain S/o Sh. Puran Lal Jain

197, Ward No. 33, Jain Gali, Baniya Wara, Ballabgarh,

B-103, Ph-I,468.83 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 103, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Rajinder Jain S/o Sh. Puran Lal Jain vide deed no. 802 dt . 20-04-2005. Developer further executed saledeed of this plot in claimant name vide adding 50.23 sqyd area making it to 468.83 sqyd. vide deed no. 3073 dated 31-05-2005 Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

82 Sh. Dharmender Jain S/o Sh. Badlu Ram Jain

242, Mukesh Colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad,

D-116, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 116, Block-D, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Dharmender Jain S/o

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Sh. Badlu Ram Jain vide deed no. 804 dt 20-04-2005. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

83 Smt. Indu Jain W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar Jain

245, Mukesh Colony, Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad, 418.60 Sq. Yards

B-101, Ph-I,468.83 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 101, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Indu Jain W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar Jain vide deed no.14774 dt 11-03-2005. Developer further executed saledeed of additional area 50.15 sqyd. on payment of 30090/- making the size of plot to 468.83 sq.yd. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

84 Sh. Sandeep Jain S/o Sh. Satender Kumar Jain

H.No. 115, J-Block, Sector- 10, Faridabad, 418.60 Sq. Yards

D- 40, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 40, Block-D, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Sandeep Jain S/o Sh. Satender Kumar Jainvide deed no.1223 dt 28-04-2005. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

85 Sh. Arun Kumar Jain S/o Devinder Kumar Jain

H.No. 109, Ward no. 7, Baniya Wara, Ballabgarh, Faridabad

B- 252, Ph-I,502.20 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 252, Block-B, ph-I,area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301416/- in favour of Sh. Arun Kumar Jain S/o Devinder Kumar Jain vide deed no.14775 dt 11-03-2005. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

86 Sh. Arun Kumar Jain S/o Devinder Kumar

H.No. 109, Ward no. 7, Baniya

B- 102, Ph-I,468.83 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 102, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Jain Wara, Ballabgarh, Faridabad

Yards sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Arun Kumar Jain S/o Devinder Kumar Jain vide deed no.803 dt 20-04-2005. Developer further executed saledeed of additional area 50.23 sqyd. on payment of 30128/- making the size of plot to 468.83sq.yd. vide deed no. 3068 dated 31-05-2005 .Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

87 Smt. Neelam Handa W/o Late Sh. Rajender Handa

H.No. 521, Sector- 19, Faridabad, Haryana,

253, Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 253, Block-B, ph-I,area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Aditya Gupta S/o Sh. Sudeep Kumar Gupta vide deed no. 3874 dt 14-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Neelam Handa on payment of RS. 450000/- vide deed no. 18612 dated 7-12-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

88 Sh. Rakesh Gupta S/o Sh. S.R Aggarwal

Ramalya, J-115, Sector- 10, DLF, Faridabad,

194, Block-B, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 194, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Girdhari Sharma S/o Sh. Shish Ram vide deed no.1230 dt 28-04-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Rakesh Gupta S/o Sh. S.R Aggarwal on payment of 800000/- vide deed no. 24506 dated 7-02-2008. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant on 29-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

89 Sh. Rakesh Gupta Ramalya, J-115, 82, Block-D, Developer executed saledeed of plot No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

S/o Sh. S.R Aggarwal

Sector- 10, DLF, faridabad,

Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

no. 82, Block-D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Rakesh Gupta S/o Sh. S.R Aggarwal vide deed no. 11274 dated 26-10-2005. Physical possession was handed over to the claimant on 27-10-2005.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

90 Sh. Arvind Oberoi S/o Sh. J.K Oberoi

110, Mukherjee Park, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi,

104E, Block-D. Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 104E, Block-D, Phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/ - in favour of Sh. Arvind Oberoi S/o Sh. J.K Oberoi and Smt. Vimal Prabha W/o Sh. J.K. Oberoi vide deed no. 15702 dt 24-03-2005 . Possession of plot is handed over on 29-03-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

91 Sh. Madan Lal Goyal and Sh. Manohar Lal Goyal through GPA Sh. Dharamvir S/o Late Sh. Shiv Charan Dass

Ward No. 9, Near Old Civil Hospital, VPO Punhana, Distt- Mewat,

E-3, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 3, Block-E, Phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/ - in favour of Sh. Keshav Dayal S/o Sh. Rameshwar Dayal vide deed no. 13078 dt 25-11-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kamla Devi W/o Sh. Sant Lal on payment of RS. 3,00,000/- vide deed no. 18547 dated 21-02-2006 Reliquisdeed was executed in favour of Sh. Madan Lal Goyal, Sh. Manohar Lal Goyal S/o Sh. Sant Lal vide deed no. 3664 dated 27-06-2013.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

92 Sh. Vinod Kumar Rawat S/o Sh. G.L Rawat

H.No. 143, Gujar Dairy, Gautam Nagar, New Delhi-

B-222, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 222, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

110049, favour of Sh. Vinod Kumar Rawat S/o Sh. G.L Rawat vide deed no. 1702 dt 17-05-2004 Physical possession was handed over to the claimant.

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

93 Sh. Ayush Aggarwal S/o sh. Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal

S-201, GK-1, New Delhi- 48,

I- 51, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 51, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 188130 /- in favour of Smt. Kavita Sethi W/o Sh.Ashim Sethi vide deed no. 26358 dated 22-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Ayush Aggarwal S/o sh. Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal on payment of Rs. 400000/- vide deedno. 709 dated 8-04-2008 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

94 Smt. Veena Bhasin W/o Sh. Rajiv Bhasin

1054, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

11, Block-F, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 11, Block-F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Smt. Veena Bhasin W/o Sh. Rajiv Bhasin vide deed no. 3054 dated 31-05-2005. Phycisal possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

95 Sh. Jagdish Gupta S/o Late Sh. Hansraj Gupta

1105, Sector- 14, Faridabad, Haryana,

B-8, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 8, Block-B, ph-I,area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 363000/- in favour of Sh. Suresh Aggarwal S/o Sh. Ratan Lal vide deed no.4221 dt 21-02-2005 who further executed saledeed of plot in favour of Smt. Nirmla Gotyal W/o Sh. Purshotam Dass Goyal on payment of 500000/- vide deed no. 6362 dated 14-07-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

2006 who further executed salded of this plot in favour ofSh. Jagdish Gupta S/o Late Sh. Hansraj Gupta Rs. 650000/- vide deed no. 2658 dated 30-04-2008.

96 Sh. Manish Jain S/o Sh. Rajender Jain

H.No. A15, Near Sapphire International School, Sector-70, Noida,

B-104, Ph-I,468.83Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 104, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Sh. Manish Jain S/o Sh. Rajender Jain vide deed no. 1226 dated 28-04-2005. Developer re-executed saledeed of this plot again while adding 50.23 sqyd. (total 468.83 sqyd. ) on additional payment of Rs. 30138/- vide deed no. 3069 dated 31-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

97 Smt. Sharda W/o Sh. Radhey Shayam

Village- Fatehpur Billoch, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad,

I-35, Ph-II,432.08 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 35, Block-I, ph-II,area 432.08 sqyd. on payment of 280852/- in favour of Smt. Sharda W/o Sh. Radhey Shayam vide deed no.26338 dt 26-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

98 Sh. R.P Gupta S/o Sh. Ram Chander & R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj Joshi

Vill- H.no. 386 , Sector -14 Gurgaon, Haryana & H.No. S-70, Ist Floor, G.K-1, New Delhi,

E-214, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 214, Block-E, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards. on payment of 326508/- in favour of Sh. R.P Gupta S/o Sh. Ram Chander & R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj Joshi vide deed no. 1158 dated 30-04-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

99 Sh. R.P Gupta S/o Sh. Ram Chander &

Vill- H.no. 386 , Sector -14

E-07, Ph-I,289.43 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 07, Block-E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj Joshi

Gurgaon, Haryana & H.No. S-70, Ist Floor, G.K-1, New Delhi,

Yards Yards. on payment of 173760/- in favour of Smt. Jyoti Kumar W/o V. Kumar vide deed no. 5885 dated 25-07-2005 who further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. R.P Gupta S/o Sh. Ram Chander & R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj Joshi vide deed no. 4644 dated 12-06-2007 on payment of 231544/-

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

100 Ms. Renu Joshi D/o Sh. Ved Prakash & Ms. Pushpa Gupta D/o Sh. Jagannath Prasad

S-70, 1st Floor, GK-1, New Delhi & Vill- Wazirpur, Gurgaon, Haryana,

F-9, Ph-I, 289.2 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 9, Block-F, Ph-I, 289.2 Sq. Yards. on payment of 174000/- in favour of Renu Joshi D/o Sh. Ved Prakash & Pushpa Gupta D/o Sh. Jagannath Prasad vide deed no. 184 dated06-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

101 Sh. R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj

H.No. S-70, 1st Floor, GK-1, New Delhi-

I-14, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 14, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 188129/- in favour of Sh. R.K Joshi S/o Sh. Mul Raj vide deed no. 17932 dated 29-12-2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

102 Smt. Renu Joshi W/o R.K Joshi

H.No. S-70, 1st Floor, GK-1, New Delhi-

B-240, Ph-I,418.6 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 240, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards. on payment of251160/- in favour of Smt. Savitri Malra W/o Sh. Rameshwar Dass Malra vide deed no. 3184 dt 1-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Renu Joshi W/o on payment of 293020/- vide deed no.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

575 dated 13-04 -2006.

103 Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. B.N Chaudhary & Sh. Baljit Singh Bhatia S/o Sh. D.S Bhatia

H.No. 241, Sector-09, Faridabad & H.No. 255, Sector-15, Escorts Nagar, Faridabad

B-250, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 250, Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd. on amount of 301392/- in favour of Smt. Alka Rani W/o Sh. Sanjay Kumar vide deed no. 3179 dated 01.06.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. B.N Chaudhary & Sh. Baljit Singh Bhatia S/o Sh. D.S Bhatia on payment of 351624/- vide deed no.13835 dated 12-12-2005. Physical possession handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

104 Smt. Rikki Chaudhary W/o Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary

H.No. 241, Sector- 09, Faridabad,

D-88, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 88, Block-D, Ph-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on amount of 173658/- in favour of Sh. HEmant Kumar & Sh. Deepak Kumar S/o Sh. Jagannath vide deed no. 14777 dated 11.03.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rikki Chaudhary W/o Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary on payment of 2,02,600/- vide deed no.12382 dated 16-11-2005. Physical possession handed offered to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

105 Smt. Rikki Chaudhary W/o Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary

H.No. 241, Sector- 09, Faridabad,

B-139, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. yards

Developer through GPA 03.05.2001 through Sh. Atma Ram Panchal executed sale of plot no. B-139, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards in favour of Smt. Rikki Chaudhary W/o Sh. Sudhir Chaudhary on payment of 251160/- vide deed no. 16033 dated

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court

12.01.2006. order dated 23-11-2000.

106 Smt. Manju Jain W/o Sh. Parveen Jain through SPA Sh. Subhash Chand Madan S/o Sh. Lakhmi Chand Madan

H.No. 294, Sector- 09, Faridabad,

B-124, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 124, Block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Keshav Kumar S/o Sh. Mahesh Chand and Sh. Yogesh Chand S/o Sh. Madan lal vide deed no. 2752 dated 26.05.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of SLH Estate Pvt. LTd. through Sh. Mayank Aggarwal on payment of 350000/- vide deed no.12010 dated 09-11-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Manju Jain W/o Sh. Parveen Jain vide deed no. 17303 dated 3-02-2006 on payment of Rs. 5,00,000/-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

107 Smt. Ruchi Madan W/o Sh. Vikas Madan

H.No. 294, Sector- 09, Faridabad,

E-28, Ph-I,279.43Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 28, Block-E, Ph-I, 279.43 sqyd. on payment of 181630/- in favour of Sh. Vinit Kumar Batuta S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar vide deed no. 10082 dated 21.08.2007 who through SPA Smt. Gita Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ruchi Madan W/o Sh. Vikas Madan on payment of 1040,000/- vide deed no. 16080 dated 07-10-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

108 Sh. Dharam Pal S/o Sh. Het Ram

H.No. 118, Ashoka Enclave-1, Sector- 34, Faridabad,

D-98, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 98, Block-D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Dr. Dharam Pal S/o Sh. Het

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Ramvide vide deed no. 16108 dated 31-03-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

109 Smt. Priyanka Sharma W/o Sh. Ajay Sharma

H.No. 1429, Sector- 16, Faridabad,

I-85, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 85, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Bharo Singh S/o Sh. Umrao Singh vide deed no. 23113 dated 21-01-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Priyanka Sharma W/o Sh. Ajay Sharma on payment of Rs. 250000/- vide deed no. 5496 dated 04-06-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

110 Smt. Priyanka Sharma W/o Sh. Ajay Sharma

H.No. 1429, Sector- 16, Faridabad,

I-45, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 45, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Ankit Upadhay S/o Sh. Umesh Kumar vide deed no. 26376 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Priyanka Sharma W/o Sh. Ajay Sharma on payment of Rs. 1071000/- vide deed no. 5373 dated 02-06-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

111 Smt. Sudha Gautam W/o Sh. Kalicharan Gautam

H.No. 1429, Sector- 16, Faridabad,

I-21, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 21, Block-I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 125000/- in favour of Sh. Surinder S/o Sh. Rajbir vide deed no. 25469 dated 15-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sudha Gautam W/o Sh.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

Kalicharan Gautam on payment of Rs. 290000/- vide deed no. 3782 dated 14-05-2008.

112 Maneesha Khanna W/o Sh. Rajat Khanna & Karuna Prakash D/o S.K Prakash

C-66, Sec-14, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, U.P-201301,

D-100, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 100, Block-D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Maneesha Khanna W/o Sh. Rajat Khanna & Karuna Prakash D/o S.K Prakash vide deed no. 10196 dated 13-10-2005

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

113 Maneesha Khanna W/o Sh. Rajat Khanna & Karuna Prakash D/o S.K Prakash

C-66, Sec-14, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Noida, U.P-201301,

D-72, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 72, Block-D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Maneesha Khanna W/o Sh. Rajat Khanna & Karuna Prakash D/o S.K Prakash vide deed no. 7554 dated 13-08-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

114 Smt. Sunita Garg & Smt. Renuka Garg

C1-126/1, Nalagarh Ka Majra Near Kumar Steels Ambala road Jagadhri-135003 (ii) 133/2, Vishnu Garden Block B Bilaspur by pass road Jagadhri-135003

216, block E, area 502.32 sqyd. Phase-I

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 216 block E area 502.32 sqyd. On payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Raghubar Dayal S/o Sh. Mangal Singh vide saledeed no. 6064 dated 1-08-2005. Late Sh. Raghubar Dayal through executed will in favour of Smt. Uma Garg who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Saraswati Sharma vide ded no. 24249 dated 4-02-2008 on payment of 500000/- who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Sunita Garg

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

& Smt. Renuka Garg on payment of 1858584/- vide deed no. 667 dated 13-04-2010.

115 Smt. Parul Mittal W/o Mr. Nipun Mittal

1814, Civil Lines, Jagadhri-135003

52 block E, area 289.43 sqyd phase-I

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 52 block E area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Bramhdev Singh S/o Sh. Mahant Singh vide deed no. 16113 dated 31-03-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Parul Mittal on payment of 1070000/- vide deed no. 21066 dated 19-03-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

116 Smt. Anju Devi W/o Sh. Satish Kumar through SPA Sh. Sanjeev Chhabra S/o Late Sh. Ved Prakash

1366, Sector- 19, Faridabad

26, Block-A, (Ph-I)502 sqyd.

Developer through GPA Sh. Dharmender ( for plot no. A-22, 23, 24,25, 26, 27, 28) executed saledeed of plot no. 26 (&25) Block-A, area 502 x2 sqyd. on amount of 301250/- each plot (602500 /2) in favour of Smt. Anju Devi W/o Sh. Satish Kumar vide deed no.9837 dated 17-08-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

117 Sh. Mukesh Goyal S/o Sh. G.N. Goyal through SPA Sh. Rajiv Gupta S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan Gupta

F-1, Kailash Colony, Ground Floor, New Delhi- 48,

B-114, Phase-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 114 block B Phase-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Goyal S/o Sh. G.N. Goyal vide saledeed no. 3051 dated 31-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

118 Smt. Sunita Gupta W/o Sh. Rajiv Gupta

F-1, Kailash Colony, New Delhi- 48,

B-16, Ph-I,502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 16 block B, Phase-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Jitender

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Goyal S/o Hukam Chand vide saledeed no. 2741 dated 26-05-2005 who further executed saleded of this plot on payment of Rs. 1860000/- in favour of Smt. Sunita Gupta W/o Sh. Rajiv Gupta vide deed no. 2320 dated 12-05-2010.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

119 Sh. Sunil Kumar & Ravinder Kumar S/o Sh. Chhankanda Ram Uppal

H.No. 492/31, Faridabad,

I-19, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 19 block I, Phase-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Sunil Kumar & Ravinder Kumar S/o Sh. Chhankanda Ram Uppal vide saledeed no. 5406 dated 18-07-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

120 Smt. Meera Singla W/o Dr. Sant Kumar Singla

C-12A, 3rd Floor, Green Park Mains, New Delhi- 110017,

B-242, Ph-I,605 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 242 block B area 605 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 363000/- in favour of Sh. Suresh Aggarwal S/o Sh. Rattan Lal vide deed no. 15699 dated 24-03-2005 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Neelam Madan W.o Sh. Satyadev Madan on payment of Rs.968000 /- vide deed no. 18473 dated 20-02-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Meera Singla W/o Dr. Sant Kumar Singla on payment Rs. 2800000/- vide deed no. 13906 dated 27-12-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

121 Smt Sunita Tondon W/o Sh. Nalin Kumar Tondon

H.No. 38, Pacca Kot, Kashipur, Uttarakhand,

18, Block-I, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 18 block I area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-II on payment of 173658/- in

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

favour of Smt. Meera Puri W/o Sh. Baleshwar Puri vide deed no. 2744 dated 26-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Sh. Sanjay Kumar S/o Sh. Om vir Singh on payment of Rs.1015000/- vide deed no. 8117 dated 14-08-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt Sunita Tondon W/o Sh. Nalin Kumar Tondon on payment Rs. 750000/- vide deed no. 8147 dated 21-08-2009.

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

122 Lt. Smt. Shyama D/o Sh. Ratish Mohan Pathak

H.No. 153, Power House Colony, Palla No. 03, Faridabad,

D-95, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 95,block D area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Shyama D/o Sh. Ratish Mohan Pathak vide deed no. 14778 dated 11-03-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

123 Sh. Sumit Sheoran S/o Sh. Ishwar Pal Singh

Vill & PO- Rori, Modinagar, Distt- Gaziabad, Uttarpradesh

I-11, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 11,block I area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-II on payment of 125000/- in favour of Smt. Anita W/o Sh Umesh vide deed no. 25482 dated 15-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sumit Sheoran S/o Sh. Ishwar Pal Singh on payment of Rs. 220000/- vide deed no. 4830 dated 27-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

124 Smt. Neelam Sheoran W/o Sh. Sumit Sheoran

Vill & PO- Rori, Modinagar, Distt- Gaziabad,

I-205, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 205,block I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

Uttarpradesh favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jawala Prasad vide deed no. 3052 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour ofSmt. Neelam Sheoran W/o Sh. Sumit Sheoran on payment of Rs. 351624/- vide deed no. 12387 dated 16-11-2005.

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

125 Smt. Shweta Jain W/o Sh. Akshay Kumar Jain

H.No. J-115, Sector-10, DLF, Faridabad,

F-92, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 92, block F area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Meenakshi D/o Sh. J.K. Dua vide deed no. 3058 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Shweta Jain W/o Sh. Akshay Kumar Jain on payment of Rs. 250000/- vide deed no.11196 dated 08-08-2008. Physical possession handed to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

126 Smt. Manju Jain W/o Sh. S.K Jain and Smt. Mohini Gupta W/o Sh. N.K. Gupta

J-115, Sector-10, Faridabad- 121006,

B-256, Ph-I,301.39 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 256, block B area 301.39 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 180834/- in favour of Sh. R.K. Bhalla S/o Sh. S.L. Bhalla vide deed no. 5548 dated 30-06-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Manju Jain W/o Sh. S.K Jain and Smt. Mohini Gupta W/o Sh. N.K. Gupta on payment of Rs. 300000/- vide deed no.4308 dated 20-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

127 Sh. Sumit Sheoran Vill & PO- Rori, 131, block-D, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

S/o Sh. Ishwar Pal Singh

Modinagar, Distt- Gaziabad, Uttarpradesh

675.32 sqyd., phase-I

plot no. 131,block D area 675.32 sqyd. on payment of 405192/- in favour of Sh. Sumit Sheoran vide deed no. 13063 dated 25-11-2005.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

128 Sh. Abhay Lamba & Sh. Sumit Sheoran S/o Sh. Ishwar Pal Singh

Vill & PO- Rori, Modinagar, Distt- Gaziabad, Uttarpradesh

89, block -I , 289.43 sqyd. Phase-II

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 89,block I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs. 188130/- in favour ogf Sh. Ram Avtar S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad vide deed no. 24237 dated 4-02-2008, who further executed saledeed on payment of Rs.219000/- in favour of Sh. Sumit Sheoran and Sh. Abhay Lamba vide deed no.4621 dated 26-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

129 Smt. Meera Singla W/o Dr. Sant Kumar Singla and Smt. Beena chaudary D/o Sh. K.P. Singh

C-12A, 3rd Floor, Green Park Mains, New Delhi- 110017,

61 , block I, 289.43 sqyd., Phase-II

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 61 ,block I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 125000/- in favour of Sabehul Hassain s/o Narul Hassain vide deed no. 25657 dated 18-02-2008 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Meera Singla W/o Dr. Sant Kumar Singla and Smt. Beena chaudary D/o Sh. K.P. Singh on paymen tof 1500000/- vide saledeed no. 2397 dated 17-05-2011.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

130 Smt. Rajni Chaudhary & Smt. Nidhi Singla W/o Sh. Manik Singla

233, Naval Technical Officers Appartments , Plot no. 3A, Sector- 22,

I-13, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 13 ,block I area 289.43 sqyd., phase-II on payment of 188129 /- in favour of Sh. R.P. Gupta S/o Sh. R.C. Gupta vide deed no.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 & C-12A, Second Floor, Green Park Main, New Delhi- 110016,

17930 dated 29-12-2006 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rajni Chaudhary & Smt. Nidhi Singla W/o Sh. Manik Singla on paymentof 1200000/- vide saledeed no. 2055 dated 10-05-2011.

have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

131 Smt. Madhvi Dhingra W/o Sh. Hemant Dhingra and Sh. Hemant Dhinga S/o Sh. Ravinder Nath

13 Pusa Road, Delhi,

F-4, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 4,block F area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Madhvi Dhingra W/o sh. Hemant Dhingra and Sh. Hemant Dhinga S/o Sh. Ravinder Nath vide deed no. 8992 dated 22-09-2005. Physical possession handed to claimant on 28-02-2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

132 Sh. Nitin Gupta S/o Sh. Satish Gupta

H.No. 529, ward no. 09, Jagdish Colony, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad,

E-17, Ph-I,279.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 17,block E area 279.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 167658/- in favour of Sh. Nitin Gupta S/o Sh. Satish Gupta vide deed no. 6072 dated 01-08-2005. Possession handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

133 Sh. Bhupesh Taneja S/o Sh. Hari Om and Sh. Rajeev Arora S/o Sh. Govind Ram

J-274, Saket, New Delhi -

D-99, Ph-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 99,block D area 289.43 sqyd. Phase-I on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Bhupesh Taneja S/o Sh. Hari Om and Sh. Rajeev Arora S/o Sh. Govind Ram vide deed no. 8483 dated 12-09-2005. Physical possession over on 26-09-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

134 Smt. Raj Rani W/o E-138, Saket, New B-119, PH-I, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Sh. Govind Ram Delhi- 17, 502.32 Sq. yards.

plot no. B-119, PH-I, 502.32 Sq. yard. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Vivek Kumar S/o Sh. Radhey Shyam vide deed no. 3556 dated 08.06.2005 who further executed sale deed in favour of Smt. Raj Rani W/o Sh. Govind Ram on payment of 401856/- vide deed no. 10698 dated 20.10.2005.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

135 Sh. Umesh Kumar S/o Sh. Prem Chand through GPA Sh. Abhinav Kalra S/o Sh. J.K Kalra & Abhineet Kalra S/o Sh. J.K Kalra

389, Ground Floor, Sector- 44-A, Chandigarh.

I-8, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-08, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards. on payment of 125000/- in favour of Sh. Umesh Kumar S/o Sh. Prem Chand vide deed no. 25449 dated 15.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

136 Smt. Santosh kalra W/o Sh. JK Kalra

H.No. 389, Sector- 44-A, Chandigarh,

F-6, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-6, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ajay Gupta & Sh. Manoj Gupta vide deed o. 3055 dated 31.05.2005 who through GPA executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Santosh kalra W/o Sh. JK Kalra on payment of 300000/- vide deed no. 25666 dated 19.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

137 Sh. Rohit Nagpal & Sh. Puneet Nagpal S/o Sh. Subhash Chand Nagpal

1510, Sector-43B, Chandigarh.

120, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 120, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Rohit Nagpal & Sh. Puneet Nagpal S/o Sh. Subhash Chand Nagpal vide deed no. 6539 dated 09.08.2005. Physical

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court

handed over on 05.08.2005. order dated 23-11-2000.

138 Smt. Bala Garg W/o Sh. Anil Garg

H.No. 638, Sector- 37, Faridabad, Haryana-

B-132, Ph-I, 418 Sq. yards

Developer through GPA Sh.Anil Kumar S/o sh. Rohtash Garg executed saledeed of plot no. 132, Block-B, PH-I, area 418 sqyd. on payment of 250800/- in favour of Smt. Bala Garg W/o Sh. Anil Garg vide deed no. 9976 dated 20-08-2007(saledeed for two plots)

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

139 Smt. Bala Garg W/o Sh. Anil Garg

H.No. 638, Sector- 37, Faridabad, Haryana-

B-133, Ph-I, 418 Sq. yards

Developer through GPA Sh.Anil Kumar S/o sh. Rohtash Garg executed saledeed of plot no. 133, Block-B, PH-I, area 418 sqyd. on payment of 250800/- in favour of Smt. Bala Garg W/o Sh. Anil Garg vide deed no. 9976 dated 20-08-2007(saledeed for two plots)

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

140 Sh. Keshav Kumar S/o Late Sh. Mahesh Chand

H.No. 452, Sector- 37, Faridabad- 121003,

E-42, Ph-I,289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 42, Block-E, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Keshav Kumar S/o Late Sh. Mahesh Chand vide deed no. 1705 dated 12-05-2004. Physical handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

141 Smt. Durga Devi Dangwal W/o Sh. Puran Singh Dangwal

Vill No. 11, Omaxe Green Valley, suraj Kund Road, Sector- 41-42, Faridabad,

B-106, Ph-I,468.83 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 106, Block-B, PH-I, area 468.83 sqyd. on payment of 281298/- in favour of Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Jai Krishan Gupta vide deed no. 4244 dated 21-06-2005 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Suditi Garg and Smt. Shipra Goyal on

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

payment of Rs. 1735000/- vide deed no. 21309 dated 23-03-2010 who further executed sale deed in favour of Smt. Durga Devi Dangwal W/o Sh. Puran Singh Dangwal on payment of Rs. 2200000/- vide deed no. 27815 dated 29-03-2013.

142 Smt. Madhu Aggarwal W/o Sh. Rakesh Aggarwal

H.No. 200, Gagan Vihar Vihar, New Delhi,

I-47, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 47, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 125000 /- in favour of Sh. Rakesh Kumar S/o Sh. Fale Ram vide deed no. 25480 dated 15-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Madhu Aggarwal W/o Sh. Rakesh Aggarwal on payment of Rs. 290000/- vide deed no. 4182 dated 19-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

143 Sh. Devraj Jindal S/o Chadhti Ram Jindal and Sh. Niranjan Lal

P-29, Vijay Vihar, Near Jain Mandir, Uttam Nagar, West Delhi- 110059,

D-117, Ph-I,418.60 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 117, Block-D, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Devraj Jindal S/o Chadhti Ram Jindal vide and Sh. Niranjan Lal deed no. 15279 dated 18-03-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

144 Smt. Raj Bala Aggarwal W/o Sh. Suresh Aggarwal through GPA Smt. Sarika Goel W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar

Flat no. 20-B, Pocket-A-14, Kalkaji Extn. New Delhi- Ali, South Delhi- 110019,

B-100, Ph-I,468.83 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 100, Block-B, PH-I, area 468.83 sqyd. on payment of 281298/- in favour of Smt. Raj Bala Aggarwal W/o Sh. Suresh Aggarwal vide deed no. 2233 dated 21-05-2004.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

145 Sh. Vikas Mendiratta S/o Late Sh. Goverdhan Dass Mediratta

H.No. 572, Sector- 9, Faridabad,

I-68, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 68, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130 /- in favour of Sh. Vikas Mendiratta S/o Late Sh. Goverdhan Dass Mediratta vide deed no. 26210 dated 26-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

146 Sh. Arun Sahi S/o Sh. PPS Sahi and Smt. Sudha Sahi W/o Sh. Arun Sahi

H.No. 1254, Sector- 17, Faridabad,

I-9, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 9, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Imram Khan S/o Sh. Javed Khan vide deed no. 13932 dated 13-12-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Arun Sahi S/o Sh. PPS Sahi and Smt. Sudha Sahi W/o Sh. Arun Sahi on paymen tof RS. 1157200/- vide deed no. 13815 dated 24-12-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

147 Smt. Swaran Narang W/o Sh. Yash Narang

H.No. 206, Sector- 09, Faridabad

B-195, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 195, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Smt. Swaran Narang W/o Sh. Yash Narang vide deed no. 2402 dated 19-05-2005. Physical possession was taken over on 26-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

148 Smt. Deepila Narang W/o Gaurav Narang

H.No. 122, Sector- 11B, Faridabad

I-43, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 43, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188129/- in favour of Sh. Suresh Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ganga Ram vide deed no. 9171 dated 9-08-2007

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Ms.Deepila D/o Sh. Baljeet Singh on payment of Rs. 232000/- vide deed no. 15274 dated 25-09-2008.

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

149 Smt. Deepa Narang W/o Sh. Manav Narang

H.No. 206, Sector- 09, Faridabad

I-86, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 86, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Rajbir vide deed no. 26372 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed on payment of 232000/- in favour of Ms.. Deepa Kharbanda D/o Sh. Ram Kharbanda vide deed no. 14831 dated 18-09-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

150 Smt. Nidhi Jain W/o Sh. Amit Jain

H.No. 131, Sector- 10, Panchkula (Haryana)

B-146, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 146, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Smt. Nidhi Jain W/o Sh. Amit Jain vide deed no. 185 dated 06-04-2005. Physical possession was taken over on 07-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

151 Sh. Ankur Singh S/o Sh. Multan Singh

H.No. 670, Sector-8, Urban Estate, Karnal, Haryana.

I-16, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 16, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Sunil Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Babu deed no. 3063 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed on payment of 202601/- in favour of Sh. Ankur Singh S/o Sh. Multan Singh vide deed no. 7644 dated 23-07-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

2007.

152 Smt. Kanta Devi W/o Sh. Multan Singh

H.No. 670, Sector-8, Urban Estate, Karnal, Haryana.

I-59, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 59, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 125000/- in favour of Sh. Sumit Mittal S/o Sh. Vinod Mittal deed no. 25654 dated 18-02-2008 who further executed saledeed on payment of 300000/- in favour of Smt. Kiran Sharma W/o Sh. Virender Sharma vide deed no. 5688 dated 5-06-2008 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kanta Devi W/o Sh. Multan Singh on payment of Rs. 990000/- vide deed no. 15886 dated 2-01-2012.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

153 Sh. Mukesh Kumar Johri S/o Sh. Panna Lal Johri and Sh. Atul Garg S/o Sh. Shiv Kumar

Flat no. 158A, Ankur Apartment, Block-GH-2, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi- 110063

E-202, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 202, block E, Ph-1 area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 300000/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Kumar Johri S/o Sh. Panna Lal Johri and Sh. Atul Garg S/o Sh. Shiv Kumar vide deed no. 3561 dated 08-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

154 Sh. Amit Garg S/o Sh. Rajeshwar Prasad and Sh. Anuj Garg S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand

H.No. 47, Ward No. 8, Baniya Wada, Ballabgarh,

D-41, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 41, Block-D, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Sh. Amit Garg S/o Sh. Rajeshwar Prasad and Sh. Anuj Garg S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand vide deed no. 1232 dated 28-04-2005. Physical possession was taken over on 26-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

155 Sh. K.P Lamba S/o H.No. 855, Sector- I-12, Ph-II, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Sh. J.S Lamba 15, Faridabad 289.43 Sq. Yards

plot no. 12, Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 125000 /- in favour of Sh. Sachin S/o Sh. Dhan Prakash Gupta vide deed no. 25481 dated 15-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 246000/- in favour of Sh. K.P Lamba S/o Sh. J.S Lamba vide deed no. 2825 dated 11-07-2008.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

156 Sh. Mukesh Goyal S/o Sh. G.N Goyal

H.No. 688, Sector- 37, faridabad

E-204, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 204, block E, Ph-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301398/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Goyal S/o Sh. G.N Goyal vide deed no. 3050 dated 31-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

157 Sh. Vineet Singhal S/o Sh. Satish Singhal

Anaj Mandi, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana

B-19, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 19, block B, Ph-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour ofSh. Vineet Singhal S/o Sh. Satish Singhal vide deed no. 3355 dated 06-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

158 Smt. Abha Jain W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain

4/2387, Gali no. 10, Bihari Colony, (Shahdara), Delhi- 32

F-79, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 79, Block-F, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Amar nath Taneja S/o Sh. Ram Chand and Sh. Ghanshyam vide deed no. 3057 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot on

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

payment of 250000/- in favour ofSmt. Abha Jain W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain vide deed no. 9791 dated 23-07-2008.

159 Sh. Mukesh Kumar Kashyap S/o Sh. Kishori Lal

E1/7, Punjab University, Sector-25, Chandigarh, U.T

F-95, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 95, Block-F, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Kumar Kashyap S/o Sh. Kishori Lal vide deed no. 798 dated 20-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

160 Sh. Abhiroop Sood through Sh. Virender Kumar S/o Sh. Gopal Dass

625, Sector- 29, Faridabad

F-21, Ph-I, 358.65 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 21, Block-F, PH-I, area 358.65 sqyd. on payment of 215190 /- in favour of Sh. Abhiroop Sood S/o Sh. Pawan Kumar vide deed no. 3883 dated 14-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

161 Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana

Lal katra, Haldiyon ka rasta, Johari Bazar, jaipur, Rajasthan-

B-223, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 223, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Sh. Satish Narayan S/o Sh. Raj Narayan vide deed no. 14773 dated 11-03-2005, who further executed saledeed through GPA for the same plot in favour of Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana on payment of Rs. 1936025/- vide deed no. 7122 dated 16-08-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

162 Smt. Deepa Surana W/o Sh Kevendra

S-313, Greater Kailash Part-2,

B-115, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 115, Block-B, PH-I, area

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Surana South Delhi- 110048

Yards 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Sh. Amit Pujara S/o Sh. Suraj Prakash Pujara vide deed no. 5161 dated 13-07-2005, who further executed saledeed through GPA of the same plot in favour of Smt. Deepa Surana W/o Sh Kevendra Surana on payment of RS. 2328000/- vide deed no. 11017 dated 4-11-2010.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

163 Sh. Pradeep Singal S/o Sh. Motiram Singal

C-20, Preet Vihar, Delhi- 110092

B-229, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 229, Block-B, ph-I,area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Gaurav Pujara S/o Sh. Suraj Prakash vide deed no.3475 dt 7-06-2005 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Pradeep Singal S/o Sh. Motiram Singal on payment of RS. 1339500/- vide deed no. 11043 dated 30-08-2007 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

164 Sh. Ashish Singhal S/o Sh. Gopal Singhal

201/5, Singhal Building, Sadar Bazar, Delhi Kent, Delhi

F-93, , 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 93, Block-F, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/o Sh. Tej Pal and Sh. Ajay Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. R.C. Gupta vide deed no. 1236 dated 28-04-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Sh. Ashish Singhal S/o sh. Gopal Singhal on paymen tof Rs. 1339000/- vide deed no. 5982 dated 21-07-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

165 Ms. Shilpa Jain D/o H.No. N-5, Near. I-60, Ph-II, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Sh. Narender Kumar Jain

B.S.E.S Office, West Jyoti Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi- 110094

289.43 Sq. Yards

plot no. 60, Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 125000 /- in favour of Sh. Kamrul Hasain S/o Nurul Hassain vide deed no. 25658 dated 18-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Ms. Shilpa Jain D/o Sh. Narender Kumar Jain on payment of Rs. 400000/- vide deed no.3757 dated 13-05-2008.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

166 Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain

H.No. N-5, Near B.S.E.S Office, West Jyoti Nagar, Shahdara, North West, Delhi- 110094

1 block I , Ph-II, 400 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 1, Block-I, phase-II area 400 sqyd. on payment of 248148 /- in favour of Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain vide deed no. 1925 dated 12-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

167 Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain

H.No. N-5, Near B.S.E.S Office, West Jyoti Nagar, Shahdara, North West, Delhi- 110094

2 block I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 2, Block-I, phase-II area 400 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain vide deed no. 1923 dated 12-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

168 Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain

H.No. N-5, Near B.S.E.S Office, West Jyoti Nagar, Shahdara, North West, Delhi- 110094

3, block I Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 3, Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Narender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Ferumal Jain vide deed no. 1924 dated 12-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

169 Sh. Sandeep Kumar Singh S/o Sh. Anand Prakash Singh through SPA Sh. Dinesh Garg S/o Sh. R.P Garg

958/19, Faridabad E-71A, Ph-I, 284.16 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 71A, Block-E, phase-I area 284.16 sqyd. on payment of 170496/- in favour of Sh. Sandeep Kumar S/o Sh. Anand Prakash Singh vide deed no. 16022 dated 12-01-2006 . Physical possession was handed over on January 2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

170 Smt. Sushila Rastogi and Sh. Santosh Rastogi through GPA Sh. Hukum Chand Goel S/o Sh. Puran Chand Goyal

H.No. 42, Aggarwal Gali, Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad, Haryana- 121003

D-112, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 112, Block-D, phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Sushila Rastogi and Sh. Santosh Rastogi vide deed no. 12328 dated 14-11-2005 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

171 Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta and Sh. Chander Prakash

617/2, Ahirwada, Old Faridabad and 2528, sector-16, Faridabad

F-88, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 88, Block-F, phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Rakesh Kapoor S/o Sh. M.L Kapoor vide deed no. 3044 dated 31-05-2005 who through GPA Sh. Arvind Kumar/SPA Sh. Gian Chand further excuted saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Chander Prakash S/o Sh. Jagdish Kumar and Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta vide deed no. 3109 dated 6-05-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

172 Sh. Tarun Singla S/o Sh. R.S. Singla through GPA Sh. Chander Prakash Goyal S/o Sh.

2528, Sector- 16, Fardabad,

B-130, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 130, Block-B, phase-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Tarun Singla S/o Sh. R.S. Singla vide deed

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

Jagdish Chand Goyal

no. 3557 dated 8-06-2005. Physical possession handed over to claimant.

have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

173 Smt. Mithlesh Aggarwal W/o Sh. B.L. Aggarwal through GPA Sh. Dinesh Garg S/o Sh. R.P Garg

958/19, Faridabad B-9, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 9, Block-B, phase-I area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Smt. Rajni Gupta W/o Sh. Ravi Gupta vide deed no. 4242 dated 21-06-2005 who through GPA Sh. Pawan Garg executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Mithlesh Aggarwal W/o Sh. B.L. Aggarwal on payment of Rs. 325000/- vide deed no. 34048 dated 31-01-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

174 Smt. Sunita Jain W/o Sh. Narender Jain

D-70, West, Jyoti Nagar, Delhi-94

2, block E, Ph-I area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 2, Block-E, phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188129 /- in favour of Smt. Sunita Jain W/o Sh. Narender Jain vide deed no. 158128 dated 15-02-2007 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

175 Smt. Rachna Mittal W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal

774, Sector- 19, Faridabad

I-70, Ph-II, 403.85 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 70, Block-I, phase-II area 403.85 sqyd. on payment of 262502/- in favour of Sh. Ashim Sethi S/o Sh. Guru Baksh vide deed no. 26347 dated 25-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rachna Mittal W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal on payment of Rs. 1600000/- vide deed no. 2768 dated 16-05-2012.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

176 Sh.B.D.S Chauhan S/o Sh. Arya Vir Singh Chauhan

D-7/15(S.F), Exclusive Floors, Near Lancers International School, DLF City Phase-5, Galleria DLF-IV, Gurgaon

52, Block-I, phase-II, area 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 52, Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130 /- in favour of Sh.B.D.S Chauhan S/o Sh. Arya Vir Singh Chauhan vide deed no. 23115 dated 22-01-2008.Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

177 Smt. Guddi W/o Sh. Ved Pal

1/F-11, gali no. 1, Block-F, Moldband Extention, Badarpur, New Delhi- 110044

I-44, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

As per photo copy of documents, developer executed saledeed of plot no. 44 , Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Reshma W/o Sh. Ram Lubhaya vide deed no. 23110 dated 22-01-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Guddi W/o Sh. Ved Pal on payment 4341500/- vide deed no. 6570 dated 5-09-2013.As per claimant the original documents are submitted to Finance Company against loan.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

178 Smt. Gunjan Gupta W/o Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta

D-902, New Friends Colony, New Delhi- 110025

B-140, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer through Sh. Atma Ram Panchal S/o Sh. Chander Bhan executed saledeed of plot no. 140, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Sh. Radhey Shram S/o Sh. Brij Lal vide deed no. 16031 dated 12-01-2006 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Suman W/o Sh. Balram etc. on payment of Rs.700000/- vide deed no. 4156 dated 16-06-2006 who further

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Gunjan Gupta W/o Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta on payment of Rs. 1548820/- vide deed no. 9734 dated 14-08-2007.

179 Sh. Raman Malik S/o Sh. O.P. Malik

H.No. 1306, Sector- 33C, Chandiagrh,

I-10, Ph-II,289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 10 block I Phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of173640/- in favour of Sh. Raman Malik S/o Sh. O.P. Malik vide saledeed no. 17931 dated 29-12-2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

180 Sh. Satpal Singh S/o Sh. Baldan Singh through SPA Sh. Manmohan Ram Goswani S/o Late Hajari Lal

H.No. 180, Ground Floor, Ashoka Enclave, Part-I, Power House Road, Near Kanishka Tower, Sector- 34, Faridabad, Amarnagar, Haryana- 121003

B-14, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 14, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Sh. Satpal Singh S/o Sh. Baldan Singh vide deed no. 2763 dated 26-05-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

181 Smt. Rajeshwari Gupta W/o Sh. Ramavtar Gupta and Shikha Gupta W/o Sh. Manoj Gupta

H.No. 128, Sector- 17, Faridabad

B-17, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 17, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Jawala Prasad vide deed no. 2762 dated 26-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Rajeshwari Gupta W/o Sh. Ramavtar Gupta and Shikha Gupta W/o Sh. Manoj Gupta on payment of Rs. 350000/- vide deed

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

no.21864 dated 7-01-2008 . Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

182 Ms Nirmal D/o Late Sh. Shiv Chand

411/29, Faridabad K-58, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 58, Block-K, PH-II, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 326508 /- in favour of Sh. Vinod Kumar Batuta S/o Sh. amar Nath Batuta vide deed no. 26356 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saleded of this plot in favour Nirmal D/o Late Sh. Shiv Chand on payment of Rs. 450000/- vide deed no.12787 dated 27-07-2008 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

183 Sh. Ashok Arora S/o Sh. Kishore Chand Arora through GPA Sh. Chander Prakash Goyal S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand Goyal

2528, Sector-16, Faridabad

D-94, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 94, Block-D, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Ashok Arora S/o Sh. Kishore Chand Arora vide deed no. 15988 dated 12-01-2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

184 Smt. Seema W/o Sh. Bhupesh through SPA Ms. Shikha Garg D/o Sh. Pawan Garg

1109/19, Faridabad

F-15, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 15, Block-F, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. R.K. Bhalla S/o Sh. Shyam Lal Bhalla vide deed no. 5892 dated 27-07-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Smt. Seema W/o Sh. Bhupesh on payment of RS. 290000/- vide deed no. 14051 dated 15-12-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

185 Sh. Vipin Kumar S/o Late Sh. Radhey Shyam

B-41, Ashoka Enclave, Part-II, Faridabad

B-118, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 118, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Vipin Kumar S/o Late Sh. Radhey Shyam vide deed no. 5159 dated 13-07-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

186 Sh. Keshav Kumar S/o Sh. Mahesh Chand through Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Nain Singh

Block-H, Nain Singh Apartment , Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad

D-67, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 67, Block-D, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Keshav Kumar S/o Sh. Mahesh Chand vide deed no. 2230 dated 04-05-2004.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

187 Smt. Usha Nain W/o Sh. Ishwar Singh through GPA M/s Cross Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. Through its Director Sh. Navneet Jain S/o Sh. P.P Jain etc….

A-8/114, Swapan Kunj, Kalkaji, New Delhi- 19

E-19, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 19, Block-E, PH-I, area 279.43 sqyd. on payment of 181630/- in favour of Sh. Satyapal Singh S/o Sh. Baldan Singh vide deed no. 9880 dated 17-08-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Usha Nain W/o Sh. Ishwar Singh on payment of 700000/- vide deed o. 15281 dated 31-10-2007 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

188 Sh. Devender Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad

H.No. D2, Jhariya Market, Opp Shiv Mandir, Sarai Khawaja, Amarnagar, Faridabad

B-137, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developerthrough GPA Sh. Atma Ram S/o Sh. Chander Bhan executed saledeed of plot no. 137, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160 /- in favour of Sh. Devender Kumar S/o Mahaveer Prasad vide deed no. 16029 dated

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court

12-01-2006. order dated 23-11-2000.

189 Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar

Vill- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal (Palwal), Haryana

E-47, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 47, Block-E, PH-I, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Vijay pal S/o Medal Singh vide deed no. 5464 dated 13-07--2005 who further executed saleded of this plot in favour of Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar on payment of Rs. 300000/- vide deed no.8478 dated 30-07-2007 . Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

190 Sh. Zile Singh S/o Sh. Nathi Singh

H.No. 263, Sector- 8, Faridabad

B-202, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 202, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 100000/- in favour of Sh. Ajay Gupta S/o Sh. Satya Prakash vide deed no. 1222 dated 28-04-2005 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Gulshan Pahwa S/o G.D. Pahwa Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 168 dated 5-04-2007 who through GPA further executed saledeed of this plot in favour Sh. Zile Singh S/o Sh. Nathi Singh on payment of Rs. 1940000/- vide deed no. 24277 dtaed 14-02-2013 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

191 Smt. Pinki W/o Sh. Krishan Kumar

Vill & PO- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal

B-122, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 122, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Smt. Shakuntla Devi W/o Sh. Kalash Khandelwa vide deed no. 2759 dated 26-05-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

2005 who through GPA Sh. Rajiv executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Pinki W/o Sh. Krishan Kumar Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 1714 dated 14-05-2013 .

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

192 Smt. Lokesh Singhla W/o Sh. Tarun Singhla

H.No. B-41, Ashoka Enclave Part-II, Faridabad

B-131, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 131 block B, Phase-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Smt. Lokesh Singhla W/o Sh. Tarun Singhla vide deed no. 2740 dated 26-05-2005. Physical possession was handed over by claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

193 Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Suraj and Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Devi Lal

H.No. 224, Sector- 10, Faridabad and Village- Adampur, Distt- Hisar

B-230, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 230 block B, Phase-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Suraj and Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Devi Lal vide deed no. 3473 dated 7-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

194 Smt. Sudesh Rani W/o Sh. Roshan Lal through GPA Sh. Parveen Kumar S/o Late Sh. Mool Chand

H.No. 210, Sector- 16A, Faridabad

K-111, Ph-II, 340.86 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 111 block K, Phase-II, area 340.86 sqyd. on payment of Rs. 221560/- in favour of Smt. udesh Rani W/o Sh. Roshan Lal vide deed no. 26355 dated 22-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

195 Sh. Amar Singh S/o Ram Singh through GPA Sh. Sunil Kumar S/o Sh. Anil Kumar

H.No. 239, Sector- 37, Faridabad

B-235, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 235, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Chuni Lal Garg S/o Sh. Kanhiya lal vide deed

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

no. 3060 dated 31-05-2005 who through GPA Sh. Sunil Kumar further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Amar Singh S/o Ram Singh Rs. 1256000/- vide deed no. 18890 dated 27.02.2006 .

have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

196 Sh. Amar Singh S/o Ram Singh through GPA Sh. Sunil Kumar S/o Sh. Anil Kumar

H.No. 239, Sector- 37, Faridabad

236, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 236, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Lila Gupta W/o Sh. Satya Prakash Gutpa vide deed no. 2755 dated 26-05-2005 who through GPA Sh. Sunil Kumar executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Amar Singh S/o Ram Singh on payment of Rs. 1100000/- vide deed no. 91 dated 05.04.2006 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

197 Smt. Rajeshwari Gupta W/o Sh. Ramavtar Gupta and Smt. Shika Gupta W/o Sh. Manoj Kumar

128, Sector- 17, Faridabad

B-105, Ph-I, 468.83 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-105, Ph-I, 468.83 Sq. Yards. on payment of 281300/- in favour of Sh. Nareder Kumar Jain & Sh. Vijender Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Badlu Ram Jain vide deed no. 1518 dated 05-05-2005 who furthr executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rajeshwari Gupta W/o Sh. Ramavtar Gupta and Smt. Shika Gupta W/o Sh. Manoj Kumar on payment of 375064/- vide deed no. 1027 dated 27.04.2007. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

198 Sh. Gaurav Bajaj S/o Joginder Pal

H.No. 240, Sector- 37, faridabad

B-144, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-144, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

through GPA Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jwala Prasad

Yards Yards. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Gaurav Bajaj S/o Joginder Pal vide deed no. 15275 dated 13.03.2005.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

199 Sh. K.P Lamba S/o Sh. Gajat Singh & Smt. Kusum Mittal W/o Sh. D.P Mittal through GPA Sh. Rajesh Mittal S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Mittal

Gali tambaku Wali, Sarai Khawaja, faridabad- 121003

B-147, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-147, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards. on payment of 251160/- in favour ofSh. K.P Lamba S/o Sh. Gajat Singh & Smt. Kusum Mittal W/o Sh. D.P Mittal vide deed no. 188 dated 06-04-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 07.04.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

200 Sh. Ekansh Anand S/o Sh. Sheel Kumar

H.No. 181, Sector- 31, Faridabad

F-90, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-90, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ekansh Anand S/o Sh. Sheel Kumar vide deed no. 3052 dated 31-05-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 07.04.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

201 Sh. Naresh Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Moolchand Mittal

H.No. 1, Gali- Aggarwal, Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad

B-129, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 129, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 310392/- in favour of Sh. Naresh Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Moolchand Mittal vide deed no. 2748 dated 26-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

202 Smt. Madhu Goyal W/o Sh. Subhash Goyal & Smt. Pooja

H.No.1051, Sector-19, Faridabad, Kheri

B-151, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-151, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

Mittal Kalan, Haryana-121002

Sh. Om Prakash Verma S/o Sh. Siya Ram vide deed no. 3459 dated 21-06-2004 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Smt. Kusum Lata Gupta & Smt. Bharti Aggarwal on payment of Rs. 1255800/-/- vide deed no. 10263 dated 14.10.2005 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Madhu Goyal & Smt. Pooja Mittal on payment of 900000/- vide deed no. 22167 dated 10.01.2008. Physical handed over to claimant.

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

203 Sh. Keshav Gupta S/o Sh. Arun Gupta and Rama Gupta W/o Sh. Arun Gupta

H.No. 591, Sector-19, Kheri Kalan (113), Faridabad, Haryana-121002

E-13, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 13, block E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Uma vide deed no. 7560 dated 31.08.2005 who through SPA Mahender Kumar executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rama Gupta W/o Sh. Arun Kumar & Sh. Keshav Gupta S/o Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta on payment of 2500000/- vide deed no. 12328 dated 22.08.2008. Physical possession handed over to claimant on 09.01.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

204 Sh. Amit Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Ram Swaroop Goyal

Vidya Niwas, Malroad, Karnal

B-138, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA 03.05.2001 through Sh. Atma Ram Panchal executed sale of plot no. B-138, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Amit Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Ram Swaroop Goyal on paymen of

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

251160/- vide deed no. 16034 dated 12.01.2006.

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

205 Smt. Ravi Priya W/o Sh. Satyaveer through GPA Sh. Gyan Singh S/o Sh. Adal Singh

Village- Sihi, Sector- 8, Faridabad

B-113, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale of plot no. 113, block-B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Ravi Gupta S/o Sh. Jagdish Gupta on payment of 310192/- vide deed no. 3049 dated 31.05.2005 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ravi Priya W/o Sh. Satyaveer on payment of 400000/- vide deed no. 25878 dated 20.02.2008. Physical possession handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

206 Sh. Zile Singh S/o Late Sh. Nathi Singh

H.No. 263, Sector- 8, Faridabad

A-30, Ph-I, 624 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale of plot no. 30, block A, Ph-I, 624 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Zile Singh S/o Late Sh. Nathi Singh on payment of 374400/- vide deed no. 8989 dated 22.09.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

207 Smt. Madhu Gupta W/o Sh. Jai Prakash and Smt. Usha Aggarwal W/o Sh. Sunil through SPA Sh. Harsh Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Kishan

Village- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Palwal, Haryana

E-213, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 213, block E, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Umesh Kumar S/o Sh. Premchand vide deed no. 3064 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Madhu Gupta W/o Sh. Jai Prakash and Smt. Usha Aggarwal W/o Sh. Sunil on paymentof Rs. 351624/- vide deed no. 13166 dated 28.11.2005 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

208 Smt. Shakuntala H.No. 394, Sector- D-75, Ph-I, Developer executed sale of plot no. No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Gupta W/o Late Sh. Shiv Narain Gupta

16A, Faridabad, 121002, Haryana

289.43 Sq. Yards

75, block-D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Shiv Narain Gupta S/o Sh. Vishamber Dayal Gupta on payment of 173658/- vide deed no. 12322 dated 14.11.2005. Physical possession handed over to claimant.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

209 Sh. Deepak S/o Sh. Subhash Chand

Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad

E-217, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-217, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Deepak S/o Sh. Subhash Chand vide deed no. 797 dated 20.04.2005. Physical possession handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

210 Sh. Jitender Goyal S/o Sh. Hukum Chander Goyal

H.No. 42, Aggarwal Gali, Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad

227, PH-I, Block-B, 418.60 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.227, PH-I, Block-B, 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Jitender Goyal S/o Sh. Hukum Chander Goyal vide deed no. 3559 dated 08.06.2005. Physical possession handed over to the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

211 Smt. Neelam Goel W/o Sh. Mukesh Goel

H.No. C-29, F/F, C-Block, East of Kailash, South Delhi-110065

I-75, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-75, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Neelam Goel W/o Sh. Mukesh Goel vide deed no. 23117 dated 22.01.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

212 Smt. Rachna Mittal W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal

774, Sector- 19, Faridabad

F-43A, Ph-II, 562.12 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-43A, Ph-II, 562.12 Sq. Yards on payment of 337272/- in favour of Sh.

No separate detail availble except the

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer

Suraj Prakash Gupta S/o Sh. S.P Gupta vide deed no. 13934 dated 13.12.2005 who further exeucted sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rachna Mittal W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal on payment of 560000/- vide deed no. 9021 dated 07.08.2007. Physical possession of plot taken over by claimant.

amount recorded in saledeed.

saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

213 Smt. Rekha Jindal W/o Sh. Rajkumar

A-74, C.R Park, New Delhi

E-211, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-211, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Pradeep Kumar S/o Sh. Kailash Naryana vide deed no. 795 dated 20.04.2005. who further exeucted sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Shyamwati W/o Sh. Dharma singh on payment of 10,00000/- vide deed no. 20574 dated 27.03.2006. who further exexuted sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Shiv Kumar Uppal S/o Sh. Desh Raj on payment of 800000/- vide deed no. 17450 dated 29.11.2007 who further exexuted sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rekha Jindal W/o Sh. Rajkumar and Smt. Poonam Goyal W/o Sh. Rajender Prasad Goyal on payment of 1100000/- vide deed no. 5340 dated 03.06.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

214 Sh. Suresh Chand Gupta S/o Shri Chand Gupta through GPA Sh. R.P

H.No. 568, Sector- 16/A, Faridabad

D-113-A, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 113-A, block D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Suresh Chand Gupta

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Gupta S/o Sh. Bhajan Lal

S/o Shri Chand Gupta vide deed no. 15277 dated 18.03.2005.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

215 Smt. Rekha Gupta W/o Sh. R.P Gupta

H.No. 568, Sector-16/A, Faridabad

K-38, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. K-38, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 326508/- in favour of Smt. Rekha Gupta W/o Sh. R.P Gupta vide deed no. 25416 dated 15.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

216 Smt. Mitali Jhuria W/o Sh. Rahul Jhuria

Flat No. 615, Keshav Kunj , Ramanreti, Near- Escon Mandir, Vrindavan-281121

B-255, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.255, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi S/o Sh. Laxmi Narayan Rastogi vide deed no. 4236 dated 21-06-2005, who further through GPA Sh. Chander Parkash executed saledeed of this plot on payment of 650000/- in favour of Smt. Mitali Jhuria W/o Sh. Rahul Jhuria vide deed no. 6444 dated 13-06-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

217 Smt. Sandhya Jain W/o Sh. Vinay Kumar Jain

H.No. 106, Savita Vihar, Delhi- 110092, Delhi- 110092

B-110, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.110, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Smt. Sandhya Jain W/o Sh. Vinay Kumar Jain vide deed no.5609 dated 21-07-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

218 Sh. Chander Prakash Goyal S/o

H.No. 2528, Sector- 16,

B-3, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.3, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Sh. Jagdish Chand Goyal

Faridabad. Yards Yards on payment of 301339/- in favour of Sh. Satya Prakash Gupta S/o Sh. Mohan Lal vide deed no. 3880 dated 14-06-2005 who through SPA Sh. Kushlesh Kumar executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs.700000/- in favour of Sh. Chander Prakash Goyal S/o Sh. Jagdish Chand Goyal vide deed no. 5396 dated2-06-2008.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

219 Smt. Veena Setia W/o Sh. Rajinder Kumar Setia through GPA Sh. Sanjay Gupta S/o Sh. D.R Gupta

H.No. 12, Aggarwal Colony, Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad

F-20, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.20, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Sachin Kumar S/o Sh. Dhan Prakash vide deed no. 6528 dated 09-08-2005, who further through GPA Sh. Ajay Arora executed saledeed of this plot on payment of 650000/- in favour of Sh. Harish Kumar Chawla S/o Sh. R.N. Chawla vide deed no. 17130 dated 01-02-2006 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Veena Setia W/o Sh. Rajinder Kumar Setia on payment of RS. 750000/- vide deed no. 10327 dated 14-09-2006 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

220 Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh through Rameshwar Dass Malra S/o Late

H.No. 793, Sector- 14, Faridabad

I-50, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.50, block I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Anshu Pahwa W/o Sh. Amit Pahwa vide deed no.23116 dated 22-01-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot on

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court

Sh. Sadhu Ram Malra

payment of RS. 2400000/- in favour of Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh vide deed no. 27577 dated 28-03-2013 . Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

order dated 23-11-2000.

221 Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh through Rameshwar Dass Malra S/o Late Sh. Sadhu Ram Malra

H.No. 793, Sector- 14, Faridabad

E-4, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.4, block E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173668/- in favour of Smt. Munni Devi W/o Sh. V.P. Gaur vide deed no.15998 dated 12-01-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of RS. 580000/- in favour of Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh vide deed no. 732 dated 15-04-2010 . Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

222 Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh through Rameshwar Dass Malra S/o Late Sh. Sadhu Ram Malra

H.No. 793, Sector- 14, Faridabad

I-46, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.46, block I, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 125000/- in favour of Tanushree Chatarjee W/o Sh. Devashish vide deed no.126209 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of RS. 180000/- in favour of Sh. Gurjeet Singh Dhillon S/o Sh. Atar Singh and Smt. Dipali W/o Sh. Gurjeet Singh vide deed no. 3073 dated 6-05-2008 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

223 Smt. Meenu Garg H.No. 637, Sector- E-23, Ph-I, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

W/o sh. sandeep Garg through GPA Sh. Girish Gupta S/o Sh. R.P Gupta

28, Faridabad 279.43 Sq. Yards

plot no.23, block E, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 167658/- in favour of Smt. Munni Devi W/o V.P. Gaur and smt. Raj rani W/o Sh. Baldev vide deed no. 15276 dated 18-03-2006 who further through GPA sh. Anurag Gupta and Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta executed saledeed of this plot on payment of 420000 /- in favour of Smt. Meenu Garg W/o Sh. sandeep Garg vide deed no. 29195 dated28-03-2008. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

224 Smt. Nirmla Devi W/o Sh. Bihari lal through GPA Sh. Rahul Aggarwal S/o Sh. Suresh Aggarwal

H.No. 395, Sector- 37, Amarnagar, Faridabad, Haryana- 121003

A-1, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA of plot no. A-1, 4, 31,32,33 area 502X2 sqyd in favour of Sh. Jagbir S/o Sh. Badri Prasad executed saledeed of plot no.1, block A, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards on payment of 301500/- in favour of Smt. Nirmla Devi W/o Sh. Bihari lal vide deed no.9834 dated 17-08-2007 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

225 Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sindwani S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Sindwani

H.No. 160, Near Community Centre, Sector-15, Faridabad

C-48, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA of plot no. C-46, 47, 48, 49 area 502X4 sqyd Sh. Raj Kumar executed saledeed of plot no.48 , block C, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301393/- in favour of Smt. Rani Devi W/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan and Smt. Sunita Arora W/o Sh. Jagdish vide deed no.16035 dated 12-01-2006 who further executed saledeed of thsi plot on payment of Rs. 600000/- in favour

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

of Sh.Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sindwani S/o Sh. Hari Kishan Sindwani vide deed no. 8966 dated 6-08-2007 .

226 Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar Gupta

617/2, Ahirwada, Old Faridabad, Halabad

B-111, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.111 block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Smt. Madhu chadda W/o sh. Rajesh Chadda vide deed no. 3047 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of400000 /- in favour of Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar Gupta vide deed no. 28182 dated 17-03-2008. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 30-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

227 Smt. Manisha Mittal W/o Sh. Ajay Mittal

H.No. 918, Sector- 7C, Faridabad

E-50, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.50, block E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Rambir Singh S/o Sh. Harprasad and Singh Dinesh Verma S/o Om Prakash vide deed no. 15697 dated 24-03-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of 500000 /- in favour of Smt. Manisha Mittal W/o Sh. Ajay Mittal vide deed no. 14428 dated 15-09-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

228 Sh. Gopal Krishan S/o Sh. Ram Lal through GPA Smt. Rajrani W/o Sh. Baldev Raj

H.No. M-109, Hanuman Mandir Lado Sarai, South Delhi- 110030

E-12, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.12, block E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Gopal Krishan S/o Sh. Ram Lal vide deed no. 5409 dated 18-07-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

229 Sh. Rahul Singh Yadav S/o Dr. R.L Yadav and Sh. Ashish Manchanda S/o Sh. Prakash Lal Manchanda

C-39, B.E.L Officers Colony, Chandra Nagar, Gaziabad, UP-201001 & 16/4, Old Rajender Nagar, New Delhi- 110060

D-100, Ph-I , 281.80 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.100, block D, Ph-I, 281.8Sq. Yards on payment of 169080 /- in favour of Sh. Mohan Jain S/o Sh. Veer sain vide deed no. 3182 dated1-06-2005, who through GPA Smt. Vandana Bhatia executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Rahul Singh Yadav S/o Dr. R.L Yadav and Sh. Ashish Manchanda S/o Sh. Prakash Lal Manchanda on payment of Rs. 500000/- vide deed no. 10467 dated 24-08-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

230 Sh. Dharamvir Garg S/o Sh. Pyare Lal

71A, Kanun Goyan, PS Jewar , Tehsil Jewar, Distt. Gautam Buddha Nagar -203135

209, Block-E, Ph-I,418.60 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 209, Block-E, Ph-I, 418.60 sqyd. on amount of 251160/- in favour of Anita Rani D/o Sh. Jagwat Sawoop vide deed no. 15698 dated 24.03.2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of V. Kumar S/o P Dayal on payment of 293020/- vide deed no. 8453 dated 13-09-2005, who further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Nariender Kumar S/o Sh. Rameshwar dass on payment of RS. 418600/- vide deed no. 12450 dated 26-09-2007, who further executed saledeed in favour Sh. Dharamvir Garg S/o Sh. Pyare Lal on payment of Rs. 1550000/- vide deed no. 17676 dated 27-10-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

231 M/s Gir Estate Pvt. H.No. C-20, Preet A-23, Ph-I, 502 Developer through GPA Sh. No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

ltd. through Sh. Pradeep Singal S/o Sh. Motiram Singal

Vihar, Delhi- 110092

Sq. Yards Dharmender ( for plot no. A-22, 23, 24,25, 26, 27, 28) executed saledeed of plot no. 23, Phase-I, Block-A, area 502 sqyd. on amount of 301500/- in favour of Smt. Asha Goyal W/o Rajiv Goyal and Smt. Rajni goyal W/o Sudarshan vide deed no.9836 dated 17-08-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of M/s Gir Estate Pvt. ltd. through Sh. Pradeep Singal S/o Sh. Motiram Singal on payment of Rs. 3524000/- vide deed no. 21038 dated 26-03-2012.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

232 Sh. Vinit Batuta S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar through GPA Sh. Parveen Kumar S/o Late Sh. Mool Chand

H.No. 210, Sector-16a, Near St. Peter School, Faridabad.

K-109, Ph-II, 448.50 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.109, block K, Ph-II, 448.50 Sq. Yards on payment of 291525/- in favour of Sh. Vinit Batuta S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar vide deed no. 26357 dated 22-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

233 Sh. Roshan Lal S/o Sh. Budda mal through GPA Sh. Praveen Kumar S/o Sh. Mool Chand

H.No. 210, Sector-16a, Near St. Peter School, Faridabad.

K-61, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.61, block K, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 326508/- in favour ofSh. Roshan Lal S/o Sh. Budda mal vide deed no. 26348 dated 26-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

234 Smt. Sheela Devi S/o Sh. Girraj Prasad Mangla

527/ Sector- 22, Faridabad

E-46, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.46, block E, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Suresh Agagrwal S/o

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Sh. Ratan Lal Aggarwal vide deed no. 3070 dated 31-05-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. sachidanand Pandey S/o Sh. Prabhu nath Pandey on paymen tof Rs. 210000/- vide deed no. 4690 dated 1-07-2005 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Sheela Devi S/o Sh. Girraj Prasad Mangla on payment of Rs.250000/- vide deed no. 10862 dated 30-08-2007.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

235 Smt. Suchika Babuta W/o Sh. Vinit Babuta through GPA Sh. Sh. Vinod Mittal S/o Sh. Ram Avtar Mittal

774, Sector- 19, Faridabad

K-110, Ph-II, 390.20 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.110 block K, Ph-II, 390.20 Sq. Yards on payment of 253630/- in favour ofSmt. Suchika Babuta W/o Sh. Vinit Babuta vide deed no. 2635 dated 22-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

236 Sh. Sirajudin S/o Balla Ahmad, Ishak and quyub through GPA Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Ramavtar

H.No. 774, Sector- 19, Faridabad.

D-115, Ph-I, 320.67 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.115, block D, Ph-I, 320.67 Sq. Yards on payment of 192402 /- in favour of Sirajudin & Ishak and quyub vide deed no. 11275 dated 26-10-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

237 Smt. Anita Gupta W/o Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta

H.No. 545, Sector- 21-C, Faridabad, Haryana

F-3, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.3, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Suman Jain W/o Sh. Raj Kumar and Smt. Sushma Jain W/o Sh. Surender Jain vide deed no.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in

20910 dated 30-03-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Anita Gupta W/o Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta on paymen tof Rs. 1071000/- vide deed no. 26046 dated 25-02-2008 .

receipt. compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

238 Smt. Seema Singh D/o Sh. Rajpal through GPA Sh. Ravidutt Sharma S/o Late Sh. Gurudutt Sharma and Sh. Vasudev Dutt S/o Sh. Moti Lal

Vill- Jaajru, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad, Haryana

D-96, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.96, block D, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Seema Singh D/o Sh. Rajpal vide deed no. 15271 dated 18-03-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

239 Sh. Surender Kumar Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary

H.No. 776, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

B-2, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.2 block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Dk Moga S/o Sh. Tirath Ram Moha and Sh. Charanjeet S/o Sh. Dulat Ram vide deed no.3356 dated 06-06-2005 who through SPA Sh. Dinesh Garg further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Surender Kumar Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary on payment of Rs. 510000/- 17976 dt. 3-11-2008. physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

240 Smt. Ritu Chaudhary W/o Sh. Naresh Chaudhary

H.No. 776, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

B-238, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.238 block B, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Ritu Chaudhary W/o Sh. Naresh Chaudhary vide deed

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

no.3359 dated 06-06-2005. have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

241 Sh. Sushil Bansal S/o Sh.S.D Bansal through GPA Sh. Sheel Kumar Anand S/o Late Sh. Paras Ram

H.No. 181, Sector- 31, Faridabad

E-44, Ph-I, 289.43Sq. Yards(232.98 sqyd +56.45 sqyd.)

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.44 block E, Ph-I, 232.98 Sq. Yards on payment of 139788/- in favour of Sh. Sushil Bansal S/o Sh.S.D Bansal vide deed no.5402 dated 18-07-2005. Developer executed saledeed of same plot vide adding 56.45 sqyd. area making total area 289.43 sqyd. in name of Sh. Sushil Basal S/o Sh.S.D Bansal on additional payment of Rs. 33870/- vide deed no. 6549 dated 9-08-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

242 Smt. Sunita Rani W/o Sh. Devender Goel and Smt. Rekha Garg W/o Sh. P.L Garg through SPA Sh. Rajiv Goel S/o Sh. Kasturi Lal Goel

81A/41, Paschimi Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi

E-29, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.29 block E, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 166658/- in favour of Smt. Sunita Rani W/o Sh. Devender Goel and Smt. Rekha Garg W/o Sh. P.L Garg vide deed no.15270 dated 18-03-2005.Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

243 Sh. S.K Chaudhary S/o Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

B-22, Ph-I, 560.92 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.22 block B, Ph-I, 560.92 sq. Yards on payment of 336552/- in favour of Sh. S.K Chaudhary S/o Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary vide deed no.3181 dated 01-06-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

244 Sh. Bimal Lakhotiya S/o Sh. P.C.

H.No. 776, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

B-244, Ph-I, 605 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.244 block B, Ph-I, 605 Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Lakhotiya through GPA Smt. Ritu Chaudhary W/o Sh. Naresh Chaudhary

Yards on payment of 363000/- in favour of Sh. Bimal Lakhotiya S/o Sh. P.C. Lakhotiya vide deed no.3062 dated 31-05-2005.Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

245 Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

K-35, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.35 block K, Ph-II, 502.32 sq. Yards on payment of 326508/- in favour of Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary vide deed no.26203 dated 26-02-2008. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

246 Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

K-36, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.36 block K, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 326508/- in favour of Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary vide deed no.26204 dated 26-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

247 Sh. Naresh Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary

H.No. D-252, Sector- 11D, Faridabad

B-234, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.234 block B, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Naresh Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary vide deed no.3043 dated 31-05-2005.Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

248 Smt. Kunti Devi W/o Sh. Ramniwas Bansal

Bansal Bhawan, Palla, Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad

F-18, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.18 block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

S/o Sh. Laxmi Narayan Rastogi vide deed no.3354 dated 6-06-2005 who through SPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kunti Devi W/o Sh. Ramniwas Bansal vide 7248 dated 10-10-2016 on payment of Rs. 1995000/-

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

249 Smt. Rashmi Sharma W/o Sh. Vinod Sharma

22, Sector -21 A, Faridabad

B-18, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.18, block B, Ph-I, 502.32Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh.Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jwala Prasad vide deed no. 5407 dated 18-07-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rashmi Sharma W/o Sh. Vinod Sharmaon payment of Rs. 502320/- vide deed no. 17374 dated 6-02-2006 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

250 Sh. Manu Rakhra S/o Sh.V.D. Rakhra through GPA Sh. Jitender Garg S/o Sh. Mohan Lal

08, Ashoka Enclave Main, Faridabad

B-112, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.112, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Manu Rakhra S/o Sh.V.D. Rakhra vide deed no. 2753 dated 26-05-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

251 Smt. Seema Goel W/o Sh. Ved Prakash Goel And Smt. Nirmal Mangla W/o Sh. Ram Avtar Mangla

H.No. 124, Ward No. 7, Taoru, Distt- Nuh

D-38, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.38, block D, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Seema Goel W/o Sh. Ved Prakash Goel and Smt. Nirmal Mangla W/o Sh. Ram Avtar Mangla vide deed no. 13068 dated 25-11-2005. .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

252 Sh. Ram Vilas S/o Sh. Trilok Chand through GPA Sh. Mayank Mittal S/o Late Sh. Girraj

H.No. 8, Ashoka Enclave Main, Faridabad

F-10, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.10, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ram Vilas S/o Sh. Trilok Chand vide deed no. 2754 dated 26-05-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

253 Smt. Bimla Devi W/o Late Sh. N.C Mittal

H.No. 21/3, Gali no. 03, Garhi Amritpuri-B, East of Kailash, New Delhi- 64

I-72, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.72, block I, Ph-II, 289.43Sq. Yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Najir Hussain S/o Sh. Jamir Ali vide deed no. 26336 dated 26-02-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Bimla Devi W/o Late Sh. N.C Mittal on payment of Rs. 300000/- vide deed no. 12655 dated 26-08-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

254 Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana

Haldiyo Ka Rasta Johari Bazar, Jaipur City, Rajasthan- 302003

F-23, Ph-I, 358.65 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 23, Block-F, PH-I, area 358.65 sqyd. on payment of 215190 /- in favour of Sh. Gopal Krishan S/o Sh.. K.C. Pilie vide deed no. 4241 dated 21-06-2005, who through GPA executed saledeed of the same plot in favour of Smt.Anita Devi W/o Sh. Harish Chand on payment of RS. 359000/- vide deed no. 10066 dated 25-07-2008 who further through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana on payment of Rs. 1660000/- vide deed no. 7437

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

dated 23-08-2010.

255 Smt. Meenu Garg W/o Sh. Sandeep Garg

B-2585, Dabua NIT, Faridabad

F-22, Ph-I, 358.65 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 22, Block-F, PH-I, area 358.65 sqyd. on payment of 215190 /- in favour of Sh. N.K.Goyal S/o P.C Goyal vide deed no. 3881 dated 14-06-2005, who further executed saledeed of the this plot in favour of Smt. Meenu Garg W/o Sh. Sandeep Garg on paymen tof 275000/- vide deed no. 4009 dated 15-05-2008. physical possession was taken over by claimanton 25-07-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

256 Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana

Lal katra, Haldiyon ka rasta, Johari Bazar, jaipur, Rajasthan-

A-50, Ph-I, 563.55 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 50, Block-A, PH-I, area 563.55 sqyd. on payment of 394485 /- in favour of Sh. P.M. Pant S/o Sh. Govind Ram vide deed no. 5935 dated 21-07-2010, who through GPA executed saledeed of the same plot in favour of Sh. Vimal Chand Surana S/o Sh. Rajmal Surana on payment of RS. 2610000/- vide deed no. 7140 dated 16-08-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

257 Sh. Gaurav Pujara s/o Sh. Suraj Prakash Pujara through SPA Sh. Nitin Mangla and Neeraj

H.No. 420, sector- 16, Faridabad, Haryana

B-10, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 10, Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Sh. Gaurav Pujara s/o Sh. Suraj Prakash Pujara vide deed no. 4237 dated 21-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

258 Smt. Rita Sindwani H.No. 188, Sector- C-47, Ph-I, Developer through GPA Sh. Raj No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

W/o Sh. Brijesh Kumar Sindwani

15, Faridabad 502.32 Sq. Yards

Kumar of plot no. C-46, 47, 48, 49 area 502X4 sqyd executed saledeed of plot no.47 , block C, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301200/- in favour of Smt. Anuradha Single W/o sh. Sandeep Single vide deed no.16030 dated 12-01-2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 400000/- in favour of Smt. Rita Sindwani W/o Sh. Brijesh Kumar Sindwani vide deed no. 12912 dated 27-09-2007.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

259 sh. Avdesh Kumar s/o Mahavir Prasad through GPA Smt. Rajbala W/o Sh. Shiv Charan

H.No. 84, Village Palla, Faridabad

I-80, Ph-II, 335.50 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 80, Block-I, PH-II, area 335.50 sqyd. on payment of 218075 /- in favour of sh. Avdesh Kumar s/o Mahavir Prasad vide deed no. 2634 dated 22-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

260 Sh. Hukum Chand Goel S/o Sh. Puran Chand Goel

H.No. 42, Aggarwal Gali, Sarai Khawaja, Amarnagar, Faridabad

D-38A, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 38A, Block-D, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Balbir Singh S/o Sh. Suraj Bhan vide deed no. 6548 dated 09-08-2005 who further through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Hukum Chand Goel S/o Sh. Puran Chand Goel on payment of Rs. 1500000/- vide deed no. 26265 dated 15-03-2013.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

261 Sh. Rohtash Deshwal S/o Sh.

B-197, Additional Township, NTPC

D-63, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.63, block D, Ph-I, 289.43Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Kehari Singh Badarpur, BTPS, South Delhi- 110044

Yards Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Rohtash Deshwal S/o Sh. Kehari Singh vide deed no. 16018 dated 12-01-2006.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

262 Smt. Rachna Kataria W/o Sh. Sunil Kumar Kataria and Smt. Rohan Nara W/o R.S. Nara

H.No. 2475, Sector- 16, Faridabad

B-200, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.200, block B, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 251150 /- in favour of Sh. vinod Malik S/o JC Malik vide deed no. 800 dated 20-04-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rachna Kataria W/o Sh. Sunil Kumar Kataria and Smt. Rohan Nara W/o R.S. Nara on payment of Rs. 293020/- vide deed no. 14493 dated 23-12-2005. Physical possession was taken over by claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

263 Smt. Bala W/o Sh. Jahan Singh

Vill- Sihi, Sector- 08, Faridabad

I-65, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.65 Block-I, PH-II, area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188130/- in favour of Smt. Bala W/o Sh. Jahan Singh vide deed no. 25189 dated 15-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

264 Smt. Shashi W/o Sh. Sher Singh

Vill-Sihi, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad

B-135, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

As per photo copy of GPA developer through GPA Sh. Anil Kumar of plot no. B-132,133,134,135 &136 executed saledeed of plot no. 135, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Shashi W/o Sh. Sher Singh and

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court

Smt. Suman W/o Sh. Balram Malik vide deed no. 10181 dated 22-08-2007

order dated 23-11-2000.

265 Smt. Kamlesh W/o Avdesh Kumar through GPA Smt. Sadhna Gupta W/o Sh. B.L Gupta

H.No. 1128, Sector- 37, Faridabad

I-81, Ph-II, 338.75 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 81, Block-I, phase-II area 338.75 sqyd. on payment of 220188 /- in favour of Smt. Kamlesh W/o Avdesh Kumar vide deed no. 26346 dated 26-02-2008 .

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

266 Sh.Amit Bhatia S/o Sh. R.K. Bhatia and Smt. Tripta Bhatia W/o R.k. Bhatia through Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Deshraj

Vill- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal

B-212, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.212 Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh.Amit Bhatia S/o Sh. R.K. Bhatia and Smt. Tripta Bhatia W/o R.k. Bhatia vide deed no. 6547 dated 09-08-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

267 Sh. Umesh Kathuria S/o Sh. Chaman lal an dSmt. Seema Malik W/o Sh. Gyan Singh

Vill- Sihi, Sector- 08, Faridabad

B-201, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.201 Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Chabar mal chaudary S/o Sh. Hema Ram chaudary vide deed no. 1224 dated 28-04-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Saraswati Sharma D/o Sh. Harish Chand on payment 425000/- vide deed no. 6345 dated 29-06-2007 who through GPA executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Umesh Kathuria S/o Sh. Chaman lal and mt. Seema Malik W/o Sh. Gyan

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

Singh on payment of Rs. 1937000/- vide deed no. 6836 dated 6-08-2010.

268 Sh. Ajay Malik S/o Sh. Ram Ji lal through Sh. Gyan Singh S/o Sh. Adal Singh

Village- Sihi, Sector- 08, Faridabad

A-24, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA Sh. Dharmender executed saledeed of plot no.24 Block-A, PH-I, area 502 sqyd. on payment of 301500/- in favour of Sh. Ajay Malik S/o Sh. Ram Ji lal vide deed no. 9835 dated 17-08-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

269 Smt. Mahima Gupta W/o Sh. Jai Kishan and Sh. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Trilok Chand

366, Sector- 37, Faridabad

B-4, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.4, block B, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Smt. Mahima Gupta W/o Sh. Jai Kishan and Sh. Naresh Kumar S/o Sh. Trilok Chand vide deed no. 3884 dated 14-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

270 Sh. Davinder Singh S/o Sh. Harinder Singh

H.No. 120/259 A , 2nd Floor, Lajpat Nagar, Hans Nagar, Kanpur

E-8, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. E-8, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards. In favour of Sh. Davinder Singh S/o Sh. Harinder Singh on payment of Rs.173658/- vide deed no. 6242 dated 9-08-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

271 Sh. Gautam Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Ram Kumar Mittal

126, Urban Estate-02, Hisar

B-143, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 143, Block-B, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Gautam Kumar Mittal S/o Sh. Ram Kumar Mittal vide deed no. 189 dated 06-04-2005. Possession handed over on 7-04-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

272 Sh. Naresh Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary

H.No. 776, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

B-1, Ph-I, 560.92 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. B-1, Ph-I, 560.92 Sq. Yards. in favour of Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary S/o Sh. Kotu ram Chaudary on payment of Rs.336552/- vide deed no. 3178 dated 1-06-2005. His son Sh. Naresh Chaudary is now owner of plot as per will no. 887 dated 28-01-2011.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

273 Sh. Amit Chaudhary S/o Sh. M.K Chaudhary

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

K-37, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 37, Block-K, PH-II, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 125000/- in favour of Sh. Amit Chaudhary S/o Sh. M.K Chaudhary vide deed no. 25461 dated 15-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

274 Sh. Naresh Mittal S/o Late Sh. Jagdish Chand Mittal and sh. sandeep chaudary S/o Sh. S.P. chaudary

H.No. M-150, Greater Kailash-2, New Delhi

E-206, Ph-I, 460.46 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. E-206, Ph-I, 460.46 sq. Yards. in favour of Sh. Jitender Goel S/o Sh. Hukan Chand Goel on payment of Rs.276276/- vide deed no. 2751 dated 26-05-2005 who through GPA further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Naresh Mittal S/o Late Sh. Jagdish Chand Mittal and sh. sandeep chaudary S/o Sh. S.P. chaudary on payment of 1841840/- vide deed no. 3371 dated 1-06-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

275 Sh. Satish Chander S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Dass and Smt. Vimla Devi W/o sh. Rattan

H.No. 1716, Sector- 09, Faridabad, Haryana

B-127, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. B-127, Ph-I, area 502.32 sq. Yards. in favour of Smt. Shashi Kumar W/o Sh. Vijay Kumar on

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Lal payment of Rs.301392/- vide deed no. 3558 dated 8-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Satish Chander S/o Sh. Ghanshyam Dass and Smt. Vimla Devi W/o Sh. Rattan Lal on payment of 600000/- vide deed no. 10187 dated 22-08-2007.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

276 Smt. Shashi Gupta W/o Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta

H.No. 1031, Sector- 19, Faridabad

E- 201, Ph-I, 629.91 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. E-201, Ph-I, 629.91 sq. Yards. in favour of Smt. Shashi Gupta W/o Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta on payment of Rs.377946 /- vide deed no. 3560 dated 08-06-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

277 Smt. Sangeeta Gupta W/o Sh. Deepak Kumar Gupta & Smt. Nidhi Gupta W/o Sh. Dinesh Gupta

H.No. 1031, Sector- 19, Faridabad

E- 215, Ph-I, 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed sale deed on plot no. E-215, Ph-I, 502.32 sq. Yards. in favour of Sh. Mohit KumarS/o Sh. Manish Kumar on payment of RS. 326560/- vide deed no. 9994 dated 20-08-2007 who through GPA executed saledeed of same plot in favour of Smt. Sangeeta Gupta W/o Sh. Deepak Kumar Gupta & Smt. Nidhi Gupta W/o Sh. Dinesh Gupta on payment of Rs. 700000 /- vide deed no. 25383 dated 15-02-2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

278 Sh. Sanjay Dhar S/o Late Sh. B.L Dhar

7/8, Kalkaji, Nehru Enclave, New Delhi- 19

B-5, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.5 Block-B, PH-I, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Rajiv Bhasim S/o Sh. Om prakash vide deed no. 4253

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

dated 21-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sanjay Dhar S/o Late Sh. B.L Dhar on paymen tof RS. 600000/- vide deed no. 25395 dated 15-02-2008 .

have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

279 Sh. Sawarmal Agagrwal S/o Sh. Chagan Lal through GPA Sh. Rajesh Mittal S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad Mittal

Gal- tambaku Wali, Sarai Khawaja, faridabad- 121003

A-22, Ph-I, 502 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA Sh. Dharmender executed saledeed of plot no.22 Block-A, PH-I, area 502 sqyd. on payment of 301200/- in favour of Sh. Sawarmal Agagrwal S/o Sh. Chagan Lal vide deed no. 5781 dated 25-06-2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

280 Sh. Jitender Kumar Wadhwa S/o Sh R.K Wadhwa

WZ-214, 3rd Floor, Street No. 14, Block-G, Hari Nagar, Janakpuri, B-1, S.O. West Delhi-110058

23, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 23, Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Jitender Kumar Wadhwa S/o Sh Ram Krishan Wadhwa vide deed no. 462 dated 11-04-2007.Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

281 Smt. Ranjana Singh D/o Sh. C.P Singh

Village-Murena, Distt. Aligharh, UP

37, Block-I, PH-II, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 37, Block-I, phase-II area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 188129 /- in favour of Smt. Ranjana Singh D/o Sh. C.P Singh vide deed no. 20641 dated 9-03-2007. As per note on the copy of paper the original papers are in CBI Court.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

282 Sh. Diwakar Malhotra S/o Sh. A.S Malhotra

H.No. 408, Sector- 37, Faridabad

D-97, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 97, Block-D, phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658 /- in favour of Sh. Diwakar Malhotra

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

S/o Sh. A.S Malhotra vide deed no. 16109 dated 31-03-2005. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

283 Sh. Amit Jain S/o Late Sh. Lakhmi Chand Jainand Sh. Jagan Dagar S/o sh. Sukhram Dagar

H.No. 544, Gali No. 2, Jain Colony, Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad,

B-6, ,502.32 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 6, Block-B, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 301392 /- in favour of Sh. Abhiroop Singh S/o Pawan vide deed no. 3882 dated 14-06-2005 who further executed saledeed on this plot in favour of Sh. Sh. Amit Jain S/o Late Sh. Lakhmi Chand Jain and Sh. Jagan Dagar S/o sh. Sukhram Dagar onpayment of Rs. 950000/- vide deed no. 25644 dated 18-02-2008. Physical possession was handed over to claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

284 Sh. Amit Mangla & Sh. Sunil Mangla Ss/o Sh. Ram Avtar Mangla

329, Sec-37, Faridabad.

45, Block-E, PH-I, 289.43 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 45, Block-E, ph-I,area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Amit Mangla & Sh. Sunil Mangla Ss/o Sh. Ram Avtar Mangla vide deed no. 13071 dt . 25-11-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

285 Anish Ahmed S/o Sh. Kamrudin through GPA Sh. Jitender Aggarwal

871, Sector -19 Faridabad

210, block E, phase-I, 418.63 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 210, Block-E, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 326508 /- in favour of Anish Ahmed S/o Sh. Kamrudin vide deed no. 9993 dated 20-08-2007. Developer also executed correction deed where in the size of plot no. change to 418.63 sqyd. as per deed no. 13006 dated 1-10-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

2007.

286 Sh. Rajiv Bhasin S/o Late Sh. O.P Bhasin

1054, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

I-27, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

As per certified documents developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-27, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Rajiv Bhasin S/o Late Sh. O.P Bhasin vide deed no. 23107 dated 22.01.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

287 Sh. Rajiv Bhasin S/o Late Sh. O.P Bhasin

1054, Sector- 19, Faridabad, 121.09 Sq. yards

I-26, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-26, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Rajiv Bhasin S/o Late Sh. O.P Bhasin vide deed no. 23108 dated 22.01.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

288 Sh. Devender Kukerti S/o Sh. Satya Prakash through GPA Sh. Devender Kumar S/o Late Sh. Parmal

Villl- Basantpur, Tehsil & Distt- Faridabad,

I-36A, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-36A, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards on payment of 188500/- in favour of SSh. Devender Kukerti S/o Sh. Satya Prakash vide deed no. 10509 dated 24.07.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

289 Smt. Dayawati W/o Sh. Suresh Sharma

H.No. 26/2, Palla No. 1, Near Shiv Electronic, Sehatpur Road, Amarnagar, Faridabad

I-17, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-17, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Manoj Kumar S/o Sh. Moolchand vide deed no. 5156 dated 13.07.2005. Who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Dayawati W/o Sh. Suresh Sharma on payment of 1015000/-

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produce any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

vide deed no. 8238 dated 17.08.2016.

290 Sh. S.C Gupta S/o Sh. Chand Gupta

201, Near Nirankari Bhawan, Sector- 21C, Faridabad,Haryan,

F-80, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.F-80, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. S.C Gupta S/o Sh. Chnad Gupta vide deed no. 13935 dated 13.12.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

291 Sh. S.P Chopra S/o Late Sh. S.L Chopra

H.No. 198, Sector- 16A, Faridabad

D-92A, Ph-I, 363.89 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. D-92A, Ph-I, 363.89 Sq. Yards on payment of 218334/- in favour of Smt Sushma Chaudhary W/o Sh. Jhabarmal vide deed no. 15284 dated 18.02.2005. Who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. S.P Chopra S/o Late Sh. S.L Chopra on apyment of 365000/- vide deed no. 6421 dated 02.07.2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

292 Smt. Kiran Sharma W/o Sh.Virender Sharma

H.No. 4, Guru Dayal Enclave, Aluwaliya Colony, Jamalpur, Ludhiyana.

59, Block-K, PH-II, area 502.32 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 59, Block-K, PH-II, area 502.32 sqyd. on payment of 326508/- in favour of Smt. Usha Babuta W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar vide deed no. 26350 dated 22.02.2008. Who futher executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kiran Sharma W/o Sh.Virender Sharma on payment of 400000/- vide deed no. 12788 dated 27.08.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

293 Smt. Archana Mittal W/o Sh. Nareh

E-17, Block-B-1, Extn, Mohan

B-197, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-197, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards Sq.

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Mittal Corporative Induatrial Estate, Badarpur, New Delhi,

Yards Sq. Yards Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of Ms. Nistha Jain D/o Sh. R.C Jain vide deed no. 15701 dated 24.03.2005. Who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour Jay Ambe Comodity Pvt. through Smt. Archana Mittal W/o Sh. Nareh Mittal on payment of 1255800/- vide deed no. 21188 dated 22.03.2010. Physical possession hand over to the claimant on 05.04.2005.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

294 Shri Prakash Sharma and Sh. Deepak Sharma Ss/o Sh. Thakur Lal Sharma

H.No. 217, Kaveri Apartment, Sector- 21D, Faridabad

F-8, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-8, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Vinay Jain S/o Sh. Veer Sain vide deed no.3183 dt 01.06.2005. Who futher executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Alka Sangal W/o Sh. Manoj & Smt. Pooja Sangal D/o B.L Sangal on payment of 1071000/- vide deed no. 7500 dated 18.07.2007 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Shri Prakash Sharma and Sh. Deepak Sharma Ss/o Sh. Thakur Lal Sharma on payment of 10,00000/- vide deed no. 13220 dated 01.09.2008. Physical possession was taken over by the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

295 Sh. Ishwar Singh Nain S/o Sh. Late Sh. Molu Ram

H.No. 28, Urban Estate 2, Hissar (125001)

I-71, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-71, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards on payment of 188130/- in favour of Sh. Ishwar Singh Nain S/o Sh. Late Sh. Molu Ram vide deed no. 25214

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the

dated 15.02.2008. have any payment receipt.

saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

296 Sh. Raaja Jindal S/o Sh. K.K Gupta

H.No 28, Sector- 15, Faridabad

210, Block-B, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no.210, Block-B, 418.6 sqyd. Yards on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Ram Avtar S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad vide deed no.6534 dt 09.08.2005. Who futher executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Rahul Batra S/o Sh. Vinod Batra on payment of 292740/- vide deed no. 8451 dated 13.02.2005 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of M/s Solution Buildcon through its Sh. Dharambir Jain on payment of 450000- vide deed no. 9246 dated 09.08.2007. who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Raaja Jindal S/o Sh. K.K Gupta on payment of 750000/- vide deed no. 17485 dated 30.11.2007. Physical possession was taken over by the claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

297 Smt. Shakuntla Singh W/o Late Sh. Rameshwar Singh

H.No. 1834, Sector- 16, Faridabad, Haryana

241, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 241, Block-B, Ph-I, 418.6 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Smt. Shakuntla Singh W/o Late Sh. Rameshwar Singh vide deed no. 1616 dt 07.05.2004. Physical possession was taken over by the claimant on 01.06.2004.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

298 Smt. Nirmal W/o S.K Bukkal through GPA

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

E-11, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-11, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yard. on

No separate detail availble

Claimant did not produced any payment

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of

Ms. Nidhi Chaudhary D/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary

Yards payment of 188129/- in favour of Smt. Nirmal W/o S.K Bukkal vide deed no. 11551 dt 10.09.2007.

except the amount recorded in saledeed.

receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

299 Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary

H.No. 499, Sector- 7B, Faridabad

E-26, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-26, Ph-I, 279.43 Sq. Yard on payment of 181629/- in favour of Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary vide deed no. 9909 dt 17.08.2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

300 Smt. Monika Goyal W/o sh. Vinod Kumar Goyal & Smt. Monika Gupta W/o Sh. Manish Kumar Gupta

H.No. 249, Sector- 09, Faridabad & 1105, Sec-14, Faridabad

K-39, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. K-39, Ph-II, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of Rs. 326508/- in favour of Smt. Monika Goyal W/o sh. Vinod Kumar Goyal & Smt. Monika Gupta W/o Sh. Manish Kumar Gupta vide deed no. 25448 dated 15.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

301 Smt. Daya Mangla W/o Sh. Ramraj Mangla

176, Sector- 7A, Faridabad

I-62, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. I-62, Ph-II, 289.43 Sq. yards on payment of 125000/- in favour of Smt. Daya Mangla W/o Sh. Ramraj Mangla vide deed no. 25660 dt 18.02.2008.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

302 Sh. Ravinder Gupta S/o Late Sh. Kewal Krishan & Sh. Mool Chand S/o Bhajan

H.No. 660, Sector- 14, Faridabad, Haryana

F-94, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-94, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ravinder Gupta S/o Late Sh.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently

Lal Kewal Krishan & Sh. Mool Chand S/o Bhajan Lal vide saledeed no. 13075 dated 25.11.2005. Physical possession given to the applicant on 25.11.2005.

in saledeed. claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

303 Smt. Neelam Gupta W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar Gupta & Smt. Premlata W/o Sh. Jawahar Singh

H.No. 660, Sector- 14, Faridabad

E-207, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-207, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards on payment of 125580/- in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Jawala Prashad vide saledeed no. 2760 dated 26.05.2005 who further exeuted sale deed in favour of Smt. Neelam Gupta W/o Sh. Ravinder Kumar Gupta & Smt. Premlata W/o Sh. Jawahar Singh on payment of 293020/- vide deed no. 13310 dated 30.11.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

304 Sh. Ajay Kumar HUF through its Karta Ajay Kumar S/o Late Sh. Kailash Mittal

H.No. 918, Near Dayanand Vishwa Vidyala, Sector- 7C, Faridabad

E-25, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-25, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Ajay Kumar HUF through its Karta Ajay Kumar S/o Late Sh. Kailash Mittal vide saledeed no. 9237 dated 28.09.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000

305 Sh. Madhur Jain S/o Sh. Surendra Kumar Jain

402, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

B-196, Ph-I, 418.60 sqyd.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-196, Ph-I, 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 251160/- in favour of Sh. Madhur Jain S/o Sh. Surendra Kumar Jain vide saledeed no. 1519 dated 05.05.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

306 Sh. Jitender Kumar H.No. 42, B-108, Ph-I, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Goyal S/o sh. Hukum Chand Goyal

Aggarwal Gali, Sarai Khawaja, Faridabad.

502.32 Sq. Yards

plot no. B-108, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301352/- in favour of Sh. Jitender Kumar Goyal S/o sh. Hukum Chand Goyal vide saledeed no. 355 dated 08.06.2005.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000

307 Smt. Maya Devi W/o Sher Singh (Sh. Atma Ram GPA holder from Sh. R.K Nanda)

H.No. A-568, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi- 110076

B-141, Ph-I, 299 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-141, Ph-I, 299 Sq. Yards on payment of 179400/- in favour of Smt. Maya Devi W/o Sher Singh vide saledeed no. 16032 dated 12.01.2006.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

308 Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Shankar through GPA Ms. Mahima Chaudhary D/o Sh. Suresh Kumar

D-41, Kavi Nagar, Gaziabad

B-123, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. B-123, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards on payment of 301392/- in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Hari Shankar vide saledeed no. 3048 dated 31.05.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

309 Smt. Sarla Jindal W/o Sh. Pramod Jindal & Smt. Sonika Jindal W/o Sh. Sandeep Jindal through SPA Sh. Sanjay Maheshwari S/o Sh. Vishwanath Prasad

E-27, Dayal Bagh, Near Charmwood Village, Surajkund Road, Faridabad-121009

F-2, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. F-2, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Sh. Gaurav Mittal S/o Sh. Jagdish Prashad vide saledeed no. 3562 dated 08.06.2005 who furthe executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sarla Jindal W/o Sh. Pramod Jindal & Smt. Sonika Jindal W/o Sh. Sandeep Jindal on payment of 300000/- vide deed no. 17357

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

dated 06.02.2006.

310 Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. B.K Sihag and Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Suraj

H.No. 2768, F.F Sector- 16, Faridabad & 224, Sector- 10, Faridabad

B-134, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer through GPA Sh. Anil Kumar executed saledeed of plot no. B-134, PH-I, area 418.60 sqyd. on payment of 250800/- in favour of Smt. Bala Garg W/o Sh. Anil Garg on apyment of 251160/- vide deed no. 10180 dated 22-08-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. B.K Sihag and Smt. Anita W/o Sh. Suraj on payment of 700000/- vide deed no. 14845 dated 25.10.2007.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

311 Smt. Veena Bhalla W/o Sh. Randhir Kumar Bhalla

D-128, East of Kailash, Sriniwaspuri, S.O, South Delhi-110065

E-15, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. E-15, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards on payment of 173658/- in favour of Smt. Veena Bhalla W/o Sh. Randhir Kumar Bhalla vide saledeed no. 5893 dated 22.07.2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

312 Smt. Madhu Kumar W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar through GPA Smt. Anita Gupta W/o Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta

H.No. 545, Sector- 21-C, Faridabad

B-208, Ph-I, 418.60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 208 block B area 418.60 sqyd. ph-I on payment of Rs. 251160/- in favour of Smt. Sudhir Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Kishan Chand Gupta vide deed no. 1234 dated 28-04-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Amar Singh S/o Sh. Ram Singh on payment of RS. 500000/- vide deed no. 18891 dated 27-02-2006 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Madhu Kumar W/o Sh.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

Rakesh Kumar on payment of l Rs. 1550500/- vide deed no. 27329 dt. 10-03-2008. Physical possesion was handed over on 29-04-2005.

313 Smt. Mamta W/o Sh. Shiv Kumar

6/33, Jhankar Gali, Old Faridabad,

D-62, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 62 block D area 289.43 sqyd. ph-I on payment of Rs. 173658/- in favour of Sh. Sachin Kumar s/o Sh. Dhan Prakash vide deed no. 6524 dated 09-08-2005. who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Mamta W/o Sh. Shiv Kumar on payment of RS. 300000/- vide deed no. 10761 dated 21-10-2005.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

314 Smt. Kanchan Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta and Smt. Shallu Gupta W/o Sh. Arun Gupta

B-4/142, Paschim Vihar, Delhi

B-7, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 7 block B area 502.32 sqyd. ph-I on payment of Rs. 150696/- in favour of Smt. Poonam Jain W/o Sh. Ganesh Jain vide deed no. 4239 dated 21-06-2005 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Santosh Aggarwal W/o Sh. Satish Kumar Aggarwal on payment of RS. 300000/- vide deed no. 6725 dated 21-07-2006 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Kanchan Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta and Smt. Shallu Gupta W/o Sh. Arun Gupta on payment of l Rs. 500000/- vide deed no. 864 dated9-04-2008. Physical possession was taken over by claimant.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

Direct sale deed after cut off date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

315 Smt. Madhu 871/19, D-89, Phase-I, Developer executed saledeed of No separate Claimant did not Direct sale deed after cut off

Singhal W/o Sh. Devender Singhal through GPA Sh. Ashok Aggarwal

Faridabad. 289.43 sqyd. plot no. 89 block D, phase-I area 289.43 sqyd. on payment of Rs. 173658/- in favour of Smt. Santosh Sharma W/o Sh. RAvinder Kumar Sharma vide deed no. 15700 dated24-03-2005. who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Madhu Singhal W/o Sh. Devender Singhal on payment of Rs. 1013100/- vide deed no. 6328 dated 29-06-2007.

detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed.

produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he dose not have any payment receipt.

date without any proof of receipt. The developer executed saledeed fraudulently while mentioning that the saledeed is being executed in compliance of Supreme court order dated 23-11-2000.

316 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-2, B-2, 3,4,5,6, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 2, 3,4,5,6 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot. Claimant produced a copy of letter dated 15-09-2009 and as per enclosure of this letter M/s Hindusthan Comemrcial Investment Trust Ltd. has paid 140358000/- - as investment in

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

land as per balance sheet as on 31-03-2007.

317 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-3, B-2, 3,4,5,6, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 2, 3,4,5,6 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

318 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-4, B-2, 3,4,5,6, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 2, 3,4,5,6 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X5 had been allotted

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company

@1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

319 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-5, B-2, 3,4,5,6, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 2, 3,4,5,6 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

320 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-6, B-2, 3,4,5,6, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any

builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 2, 3,4,5,6 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

321 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-7 B-7,8,9,10,11, Ph-I, (502.32x5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 7,8,9,10,11 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X 5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

322 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-8 B-7,8,9,10,11, Ph-I, (502.32x5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the

executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 7,8,9,10,11 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X 5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

323 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-9 B-7,8,9,10,11, Ph-I, (502.32x5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

324 Hindustan APT. No. 2-B, 28, B-10 Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on No payment No payment receipt The claimant informed that

Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-7,8,9,10,11, Ph-I, (502.32x5)

behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 7,8,9,10,11 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X 5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. Claimant also produced a copy of certificate from Charter Accountant dated 15-09-2009 wherein 140356000/- has been as fixed assets schedule land which includes land at okhla enclave phase-I Faridabad but no specific amount with regard to booking of plot is given. Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18

receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

regarding booking of plot/development charge.

original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

325 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-11 B-7,8,9,10,11, Ph-I, (502.32x5)

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. 7,8,9,10,11 block B, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. X 5 had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

326 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-12 B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this

12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

327 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-13 B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

328 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-14 B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the

have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

329 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-16 B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

330 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi-

B-17 B-12,13,14,16,17,

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer

No payment receipt regarding booking of

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder

Ltd. 110001 Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-12,13,14,16,17, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

plot/development charge.

charge. but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

331 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-19 B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no.B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company

against the plot.

332 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-20 B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no.B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

333 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-106 B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no.B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment

each plot. Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

334 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-109 B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no.B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company

against the plot.

335 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-110 B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no.B-19, 20, 106, 109, 110, Ph-I, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

336 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-111, B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment

each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

337 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-112, B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

from BBA with regard to this plot.

338 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-113, B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

339 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-114, B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment

each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

340 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-115, B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-111, 112, 113, 114, 115 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

341 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-127, B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from

dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

342 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-128, B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

343 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-129, B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or

Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

344 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-130, B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

345 Hindustan Commercial

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road,

B-131, B-127, 128,

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced

No payment receipt regarding

No payment receipt regarding booking of

The claimant informed that original BBA has been

Investment Trust Ltd.

New Delhi- 110001

129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-127, 128, 129, 130, 131 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

booking of plot/development charge.

plot/development charge.

returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

346 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-116, B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide

plot. the claims of the company against the plot.

347 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-117, B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

348 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-118, B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company

sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

349 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-119, B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

350 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-121, B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any

builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-116, 117, 118, 119, 121 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

351 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-122, B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

352 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-123, B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the

executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

353 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-124, B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

354 Hindustan APT. No. 2-B, 28, B-125, Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on No payment No payment receipt The claimant informed that

Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

regarding booking of plot/development charge.

original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

355 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-126, B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-122, 123, 124, 125, 126 (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the

apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

356 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-245, B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

357 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-246, B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5)

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the

Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

358 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-247, B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

359 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-250, B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the

have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

360 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-251, B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-245, 246, 247, 250, 251, (502.32 x 5) Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

361 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-253, B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5),

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether

Ph-I promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

charge. investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

362 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-254, B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

363 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-255, B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

364 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-258, B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original

does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

365 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

B-259, B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 1-07-1996 five plots no. B-253, 254, 255, 258, 259 (502.32 x 5), Ph-I had been allotted @1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- for each plot. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

366 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

E-201, Ph-I, 418.44 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. E-201,

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this

block E, phase-I, measuring 418.44 sqyd. had been allotted @ 2295 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 960320/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

367 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

E-202, Ph-I, 418.44 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. E-202, block E, phase-I, measuring 418.44 sqyd. had been allotted @ 2295 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 960320/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original

of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

368 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

E-203, Ph-I, 418.44 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. E-203, block E, phase-I, measuring 418.44 sqyd. had been allotted @ 2295 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 960320/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

369 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

E-204, Ph-I, 418.44 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. E-204, block E, phase-I, measuring 418.44 sqyd. had been allotted @ 2295 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 960320/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

370 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

E-205, Ph-I, 418.44 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. E-205, block E, phase-I, measuring 418.44 sqyd. had been allotted @ 2295 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 960320/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

371 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

F-15, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. F-15, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

372 Hindustan APT. No. 2-B, 28, F-17, Ph-I, Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on No payment No payment receipt The claimant informed that

Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

289.43 Sq. Yards

behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. F-17, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

regarding booking of plot/development charge.

original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

373 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

2, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the

executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. F-02, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

374 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

5, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any

builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 5, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

375 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

6, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 6, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company

payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

376 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

7, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 7, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide

informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

the claims of the company against the plot.

377 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

10, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 10, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

378 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

11, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 11, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

& 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

379 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

14, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 14, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

plot.

380 Hindustan Commercial Investment Trust Ltd.

APT. No. 2-B, 28, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi- 110001

18, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 18, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . Claimant also produced a photo copy of letter seems dated 5th December -1995 wherein the Durga Builder has informed the said company that 7135000/- has been received through cheque no. 068725 dated 5-12-1995 against the total price 7695900/- for 15 plots i.e. E-201, 202, 203, 204, 205 mearing 412.44 sqyd @2295 per sqyd. and 10 plots numbering F 2, 5,6,7,10,11,14,15,17 & 18 measuring 289.43 sqyd. @1000 per sqyd. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from BBA with regard to this plot.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

381 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

19, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer

No payment receipt regarding booking of

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder

Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 19, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

plot/development charge.

charge. but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

382 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

77, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 77, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the

had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

383 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

82, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 82, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

384 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

84, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 84, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

385 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

85, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the

executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 85, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

386 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

87, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 87, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- .

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment

As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

387 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

88, block, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 88, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

388 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

90, block F, Ph-I, 289.43 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 90, block F, phase-I, measuring 289.43 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 289430/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

389 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

229, block B, Ph-I, 416.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the

have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 229, block B, phase-I, measuring 416.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

390 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

234, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 234, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the

of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

391 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

230, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 230, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

392 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

231, block -B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 231, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

393 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

232, block -B Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any

builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 232, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

394 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

233, block -B Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 233, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company

paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

against the plot.

395 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

235, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 235, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

396 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New

236, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq.

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced

No payment receipt regarding

No payment receipt regarding booking of

The claimant informed that original BBA has been

Delhi- 110001 Yards photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 236, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

booking of plot/development charge.

plot/development charge.

returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

397 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

237, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 237, block

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this

B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

398 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

238, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 238, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

399 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

239, block B, Ph-I, 418.6 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 239, block B, phase-I, measuring 418.6 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 418600/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

400 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

206, block E, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether

promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 206, block E, phase-I, measuring 502.38 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

charge. investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

401 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

208, block E, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 208, block E, phase-I, measuring 502.38 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company

sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

402 M/s Class Sales Pvt. Ltd.

2B/28 Feroze Shah Road, New Delhi- 110001

207, block E, Ph-I, 502.32 Sq. Yards

Sh. Rakesh Goyal appeared on behalf of company. He produced photo copy of Builder Buyer Agreement where signature of promoters is different then the BBA executed in case of other plots. Claiment informed that he does not have original BBA since the same have been taken back by the builder. Through this agreement dated 8-12-1995 plot no. 207, block E, phase-I, measuring 502.32 sqyd. had been allotted @ 1000 per sqyd.on payment of Rs. 502320/- . As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot. As per claimant M/s Class slae Pvt. Ltd. paid 10000000/- to developer through cheque dated 25-11-1994 and 19-12-1994 and informed that he does not have any reference

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

No payment receipt regarding booking of plot/development charge.

The claimant informed that original BBA has been returned back to the builder but it is not clear whether investment made with the developer is refunded back or not after surrending the original documents. As per the claimant he does not have any communication apart from copy of BBA with regard to this plot . The committee is of the view that since the company neither have any payment receipt nor any original documents therefore the Hon'ble Arbitrator may decide the claims of the company against the plot.

with regard to payment made against booking of plots with Durga Builder.

ANNEXURE –IV

EWS CATEGORY

Sr. No.

Name of Claimant Address Details of plot no., area (sqyd.) Block No.

Details of booking and payment Total amount paid/Saledeed if any etc.

Remarks

1 Late Smt. Meena Kumari W/o Sh. Vijay Kumar

260, Near Bhero Mandir, Mundka, West Delhi-110041

292, Block-H, area 60 sqyd. Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 30.12.1994 and 4800/- as per receipt dated 12.12.1995. Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free

Paid 5400/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 01.07.1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

security against maintenance on 12.12.1995.

2 Sh. Naveen Kumar S/o Sh. Mahavir Prasad

1/5728-G, Gali No. 16, Near Balbir Nagar (Near Balbir Nagar Chowk), Delhi-110032

351, Block-H, area 60 sqyd. Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 30.12.1994 and 4800/- as per receipt dated 12.12.1995. Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 12.12.1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 30.11.1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

3 Bhagwati Bhatt W/o Sh. K.D Bhatt (Original allottee Sh. Dayanand S/o Sh. Chnaderpal)

L1/25, Ground Floor, Park- Elite Floors, Sector- 84, Faridabad

43, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD dated 30.08.1993 and 3480/- as land cost during 1994-96. Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 12.12.1995.

Paid 5980/- as land cost Developer exeucted registry of plot no. 43, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Dayanand S/o Sh. Chnaderpal vide deed no. 1432 dated 28.04.2010 and physical possession handed over to the claimant Sh. Dayanand S/o Sh. Chnaderpal. Exeucted sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ranjana Gupta W/o Sh. Sanjay Kumar on payment of 200000/- vide deed no. 5861 dated 20.07.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Bhagwati Bhatt W/o K.D Bhatt on payment of 420000/- vide deed no. 6087 dated 05.08.2011.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

4 Sh. Sonbir Singh S/o Sh. Fagnu Singh

Super Seals India Pvt. Ltd. Mathura Road, Faridabad- 121003

37, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 17.08.1993 and 3480/- in year 1994-96. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 24.11.1994.

Paid 5400/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 01.07.1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

5 Sh. Dheeraj Upadhyay S/o Late Sh. Dharampal

1827, Sector- 04, Gurgaon

258, Block-G, 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 05.10.1993 and paid 3480/- in year 1994-96. The

Paid 5980/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

Sharma Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 04.10.1994.

developer letter dated 01.07.1997. draw held in 1994.

6 Smt. Shelly Jain W/o Sh. Anuj Jain (Resale originally from Sh. Mukesh Kumar)

897, Sector- 09, Faridabad, Haryana- 121006

8, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 03.09.1993 by Sh. Mukesh Kumar and also paid 2000/- as land cost in year 1994. As per developer letter claimant also paid 1000/- vide DD dated 20.10.1994. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security for making maintenance on 03.10.1994.

Paid Rs. 5500/- as land cost .Developer executed sale deed of plot no. 08, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. On payment of 39000/- in favour of Sh. Mukesh Kumar S/o Sh. Raj Kumar Mangla vide deed no. 23832 dated 29.01.2008 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Meera Devi W/o Sh. B.S Puri on payment of 111000/- vide deed no. 24222 dated 04.02.2008 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Suman Gupta W/o Sh. Ashok Gupta on payment of 235000/- vide deed no. 28693 dated 25.03.2008, who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Shelly Jain W/o Sh. Anuj Jain on payment of 265000/- vide deed no. 23155 dated 29.01.2013.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

7 Sh. Naveen S/o Late Sh. S.K Talwar

Flat no. 2678, Sector- 55, HBC, Ballabgarh, Faridabad

301, Block-G, Ph-I, area 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 06.10.1993 and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security for making maintenance on 03.10.1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 01.07.1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

8 Sh. Veena Gupta W/o Sh. Yogesh through GPA Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta

34, Village-Bikaner, Rewari-123401

332, Block-H, Ph-II, area 60 sqyd (EWS)

Paid 4800/- as land cost on 12.12.1995 and also paid 300/-, security charges against maintenance services. As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 the

Paid 4800/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 01.07.1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

balance amount is to be paid at the time of possession as demanded. The claimant executed GPA in favour Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta at Noida vide document no. 92 dated 18.05.2010 and also executed will in favour of Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Jai Kishan Gupta vide registration no. 943 dated 18.05.2010.

9 Sh. Deepak Kalra through GPA Sh. Ravider Malkani

H.No. 1263, Sec-19, Faridabad

259, Block-H, Ph-II, area 60 sqyd. (EWS)

Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated30.12.1994 and also paid 4800/- as land cost on 15.12.1995. The Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security for making maintenance on15.12.1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost and rest of the amount is to be deposited at the time of possession as per developer letter dated 01.07.1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

10 Smt. Laxmi Devi Bhatt W/o Sh. R.D Bhatt (original allottee Sh. Ram Kala S/o Yashochan)

Flat no. 702, Victoria Tower, Omaxe Heights, Sector- 86, Faridabad, Haryana- 121002

G-235, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 01.09.1993 by Sh. Ram Kala and also paid 2000/- as land cost in year 1994. claimant also paid 1000/- vide DD dated 22.12.1994. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 07.10.1994.

Paid Rs. 5500/- as land cost. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 235 block G area 60 sqyd phase-I in favour of Sh. Ram Kala S/o yashochan on payment of Rs. 5980/- vide deed no. 3681 dated 12-05-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Kamrul Hassan on payment of Rs. 225000/- vide saledeed no. 3813 dt. 14-05-2008, who further through GPA executed saledeed of the plot in favour of Smt. Laxmi Devi Bhatt W/o R D Bhatt on payment of 420000/- vide saledeed no. 12488 dt. 9-11-2011.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

11 Smt. Sunita through GPA Meera Devi W/o Sh. Surjan Singh

13/120 Near Jain Mandir, Bahadurgarh, Rohtak

321, Block-H,60 sqyd. Paid 4800/- as land cost on 15-12-1995 by Smt. Sunita. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 15.12.1995.

Smt. Sunita paid 4800/- as land cost and as developer letter dt. 30-11-1995 the balance amount has to be deposited at the time of

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

possession as demanded.

12 Sh. Kheem Singh S/o Sh. Mohan Singh

H.No. 2004, Gali no. 74, Near Bal Kalyan School, Parvatiya Colony, faridabad

326, Block-G, 60 sqyd. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 10.09.1993 by Sh.Kheem Singh and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1995. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 01.02.1995.

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession. Physical posession of plot was taken over by claimant on 20-07-1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

13 Sh. Lokesh Goyal S/o Sh. Brij Mohan

H.no. 420, Sector- 15A, Distt- Hisar

26, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 07.09.1993 by Sh.Lokesh Goyal and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 27.08.1994.

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession. Physical posession of plot was taken over by claimant on 16-10-1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

14 Sh. Sanjay Mehra through Sh. Sunil Mehra

42, Sadar Apartment, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I (Extn), Delhi- 110091

H-233, 60 sqyd. Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 26.12.1994 by Sh. Sanjay Mehra and also paid 4800/- as land cost in year 1995. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

15 Sh. Virender Malra S/o Sh. R.D Malra(original allottee Sh. Dharam Vir S/o Sh. Ram Kumar)

H.No. 793, Sector- 14, Faridabad, Haryana,

G-237, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Developer executed saledeed on plot no. 237, block G, Ph-1 area 60 sqyd. on payment of 39000/- in favour of Sh. Dharam Vir S/o Sh. Ram Kumar vide deed no. 20378 dated 18-12-2007. Sh. Dharam vir executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Tanu Shree Chatargee on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 21692 dated 26-03-2010 who further exected saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Virender Malra S/o Sh. R.D Malra on payment of Rs. 60000/- vide deed no. 1237 dated 26-04-2010.

No separate detail availble except the amount recorded in saledeed. Claimant did not produced any payment receipt except the saledeed. As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt. The saledeed was executed mentioning direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

16 Smt. Shashi Singh W/o Sh. Hemraj

H.No. Q-205, South City- 1,

H-295, Ph-II, 60 sqyd. The receipt of amount paid at the time of submission of application by Smt.

Paid Rs.4800/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be

As per list of successful candidates signed by

Singh Gurugram Distt. Gurugram (Haryana)

Shashi Singh is not available with the applicant but as per letter dated 31-11-1995 by developer it is mentioned that you got EWS plot in draw held on 18-11-1995 and also paid 4800/- as land cost in year 1995. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 15-12-1995.

deposited at the time of posession. developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

17 Sh. Swarn Singh S/o Sh. Balbir Singh

H.No. 90, Sector -P.L.A, Hissar, 125001

155, Block-G,50 Sq. mts. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 03.09.1993 by Sh. Swarn Singh and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 019.11.1994.

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

18 Ms. Seema Sharma D/o Sh. Ram Babu Sharma

H.No. 99, Sector- 18, Faridabad,

23, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 Sq. mts.

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 03.09.1993 by Seema Sharma and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 19.07.1995

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1994. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

19 Sh. Anand Kumar S/o Sh. Paras Ram

A-202, Navrattan Apartments, Plot no. 7A, Sector- 23, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110077,

315, Block-G, Ph-I,50 Sq. meter

Claimant informed that all payment receipt accept one are lost. As per the developer letter dated 2-07-1996 the claimant was to deposit the balace amount 480/- against cost of plot. Claimant deposited the balance amount of 480 vide receipt dt. 19-08-1996.

Paid Rs. 480/- as per receipt dated 19-08-1996 as balance amount as per developer letter.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

20 Mohd. Taiyab S/o Sh. Abdul Hakim

689/13, Ekta Vihar, Mithapur Extension, Badarpur, Delhi- 110044,

248, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 Sq. meter

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 04.10.1993 by Mohd. Taiyab and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

19.07.1995

21 Mohd. Tahir S/o Late Sh. Abdul Hakim

689/13, Ekta Vihar, Mithapur Extension, Badarpur, Delhi- 110044,

259, Block-G, Ph-I,50 Sq. meter

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 04.10.1993 by Mohd. Tahir and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 19.07.1995

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

22 Sh. Ramesh Kumar through GPA Sh. Gopal Gora S/o Sh. R.C Gora

H.No. 658, Sector- 46, Faridabad,

394, Block-H, Ph-II, 50 sq. meter.

Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 290.12.1994 by Ramesh Kumar and also paid 4800/- as land cost on 15-12-1995 . The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 15-12-1995.

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

23 Sh. Manoj Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Lal

H.no. 7, Gali no. 3, Saraswati Vihar, kalaka Road, Rewari Haryana- 123401,

305, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 Sq. meter

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 06.03.1993 by Sh. Manoj Kumar and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 07-10-1994.

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

24 Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Jain S/o Sh. Gian Chand Jain

6295, Chhipatwara, Rewari, Haryana-123401,

318, Block-G, Ph-I,50 Sq. meter

Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 04.09.1993 by Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Jain and also paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 18-01-1995

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

25 Smt. Shirly Prakash W/o IDI Kala Prakash

H.No. 2813, Ph-IV, DLF City, Gurgaon- 122009,

297, Block-H,50 Sq. meter As per the claimant he does not have receipt of 600/- paid with the application but as per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 he had been asked to deposit Rs. 4800/- as being a sucessful allottee in the draw held on 18-09-1995. Claimant also paid 4800/- as land cost on 12-12-1995.

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 12-12-1995.

26 Sh. I. Prakash S/o Sh. IDI Kala

H.No. 2813, Ph-IV, DLF City, Gurgaon- 122009,

252, Block-H,50 Sq. meter As per the claimant he does not have receipt of 600/- paid with the application but as per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 he had been asked to deposit Rs. 4800/- as being a sucessful allottee in the draw held on 18-09-1995. Claiamant also paid 4800/- as land cost on 08-12-1995. The Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 08-12-1995.

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

27 Smt. Rekha Sharma W/o Sh. Vijay Kumar

H.No. 483/1, Bhim Garh Khedi, Part-II, Gurgaon, Near Railway Road,

359, Bock-H,50 Sq. mts. As per the claimant he does not have receipt of 600/- paid with the application but as per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 he had been asked to deposit Rs. 4800/- as being a sucessful allottee in the draw held on 18-09-1995. Claiamant also paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995. The Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

28 Sh. Om Prakash S/o Sh. Molhad

Village & PO & Tehsil Wazirabad, Sector- 52, Gurgaon, Haryana,

H- 354, 50 Sq. mts. Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 21.12.1994 by Sh. Om prakash and also paid 4800/- as land cost in 1995. The Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 8-12-1995

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

29 Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Late Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi(Original Allottee Sh. Ranjit

38, Kailash Kunj, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi- 110048,

G-21, Ph-I,50 Sq. mts. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 05-09-1993 by Sh. Ranjit Singh and also paid 3480/- in year 1994-1996. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against

Paid Rs. 5980/- as land cost. Developer executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Ranjit Singh on payment of Rs. 6000/- vide deed no. 9168 dated 9-08-

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Singh) maintenance on 13-12-1994. 2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. kavita pandey on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 9826 dated 17-08-2007 who further executed deed in favour of Vimmy Jha on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 2009 dated 14-12-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sushila Rastogi W/o Late Sh. Santosh Kumar Rastogi on 300000/- vide deed no. 6914 dated 10-08-2010. Paid Rs.6000/- as land cost upto 1996. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

30 Ms. Tanvi D/o Sh. Pawan Singh(original allottee Sh. Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Swroop)

H.No. 41/41, West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi, 60 Sq. Yards

249, Block-G, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 249, Block-G, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Ram Swroop on payment of Rs. 39000/- vide deed no. 23831 dated 29-01-2008 who further executed saleded of this plot in favour of Ms. Tanvi D/o Sh. Pawan Singla on payment of Rs. 222000/- vide deed no. 28486 dated 20-03-2008.

As per the claimant receipt of any payment made by first allottee is not with her. In saledeed there is not mentioned about draw of EWS plots.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

31 Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg(original allottee Smt. Anita Yadav W/o Sh. Dharamvir Yadav)

H.No. 958, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

G-11, Ph-I,50 Sq.mts. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD dated 27-08-1993 and 2000/- as land costin 1994.

Paid 4500/- as land cost upto 1994. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 11, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Smt. Anita Yadav W/o Sh. Dharamvir Yadav vide deed no. 878 dated 19.04.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour ofSmt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Dinesh Garg on payment of RS. 277500 vide deed no. 1052 dated 21.04.2010.

32 Narinder Kaur D/o Late Sh. Sukhdev Singh

Village Morthala P.O Kaulapur, Tehsil Thanesar, Distt- Kurukshetra, Haryana,

H-405, Ph-II,50 Sq. mts. Paid 600/- at the time of submission of application vide DD no. 010812 dated 24.12.1994 by Smt. Narinder Kaur and also paid 4800/- as land cost on 14-12-1995. The Claimant also paid 300/- as interest free security against maintenance on 14-12-1995

Paid Rs.5400/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

33 Sh. Gaurav Gupta S/o Sh. Subhash Gupta (original allottee Sh. Narinder Kumar)

H.No. 251, Kailash Hill, New Delhi -65,

G-313, Ph-I,50 Sq. mts. Sh. Narinder Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD no. 811911 dated 4-09-1993 and also paid Rs. 3000/- in year 1994 also paid Rs. 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 31-10-1994.possession taken over on 31-07-1996.

Paid Rs.5500/- as land cost upto 1995. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession. Developer executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Nariender Kumar of this plot on payment of 5980/- vide deed no. 5944 dated 21-07-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sh. Gaurav Gupta S/o Sh. Subhash Gupta on payment of Rs. 277500/- vide deed no. 6487 dated 2-08-2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

34 Sh. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg(original allottee Sh. Balbir Singh)

H.No. 958, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

G-105, Ph-I,60 Sq. yards. Sh. Balbir Singh paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 456039 dated 24--08-1993 and 3000/- as land cost in 1994. Claimant also paid Rs. 310/- as interest free security against maintenance.

Paid Rs. 5500/- as land cost. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 105, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Balbir Singh S/o Sh. Thawra vide deed no. 2660 dated 26.05.2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Dheeraj Mangla S/o Raj kumar mangla on payment 225000/- vide ded no. 5358 dated 2-06-2008 who further executed saledeed in favour

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

of Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg on payment of RS. 233500 vide deed no. 19553 dated 25.11.2008.

35 Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg (original allottee Sh. Shrawan Singh)

H.No. 958, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

G-31, Ph-I,60 Sq. yards. Sh. Shrawan Singh paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 404588 dated 03-09-1993 and 2480/- as land cost in 1994-1996.

Paid Rs.4980/- as land cost. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 31, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yd. mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Shrawan Singh vide deed no. 2832 dated 24.05.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg on payment 277500/- vide ded no. 3505 dated 3-06-2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

36 Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Dinesh Garg(original Allottee Sh. Ashok Kumar Nikuse)

H.No. 958, Sector- 19, Faridabad,

G-47, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Ashok Kumar paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 184094 dated 07-09-1993 and 3480/- as land cost in 1994-1997.

Paid Rs. 5980/- as land cost.Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 31, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yd. mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh.Sh. Ashok Kumar Nikuse vide deed no. 9175 dated 09.08.2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Dinesh Sharma S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan 222000/- vide ded no. 11378 dated 6-09-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot through GPA in favour Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Sh. Dinesh Garg on payment of 125000/- vide deed no. 2782 dated 1-05-2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

37 Smt. Rajni Garg W/o Sh. Umesh Garg(Original

H.No. 2384, Sector- 16, Faridabad,

G-64, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Sh. Ram Chander paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no.

Paid Rs. 5980/- as land cost.Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 31, Block-G, Ph-I, 60

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

allottee Sh. Ram Chander Bagria)

249456 dated 03-09-1993 and paid Rs. 3480/- as land cost in 1994-1996.

sq.yd. mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Ram Chander Bagria vide deed no. 2834 dated 24.05.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rajni Garg W/o Sh. Umesh Garg on payment of 277500/- vide deed no. 3504 dated 3-06-2010.

draw held in 1994.

38 Smt. Sangh Mitra W/o Sh. Nand Lal

H-101, Sidharth Bhawan, Ashok Vihar, Ph-I, Delhi-52,

G-41, ph-I, 50 Sq. mts. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-41 was allotted to the claimant. Smt. Sangh Mitra Paid 3000/- in year 1994 also paid RS. 480/- in 1996. Also paid Rs. 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 12-10-1994. Physical possession of plot was taken over on 4-10-1996. As per registry dated 10-03-1997 claimant paid Rs. 5980/- as land cost.

Paid Rs.3480/- as land cost. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. G-41 area 50 sqmts. Ph-I on payment of 5980/- vide deed no. 15968 dated 10-03-1997.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

39 Smt. Sudha Gautam W/o Sh. Kalicharan Gautam(original allottee Sh. Sanjay Kumar Gupta)

H.No. 1429, Sector- 16, Faridabad,

G-238, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards As per claimant she does not received payment receipt from the original allottee.

Developer executed saledeed of plot no. 238, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards. on payment of 39000/- in favour of Sh. Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. Dwarka Dass vide deed no. 20376 dated 18-12-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Tanu Shree W/o Devashesh on payment of Rs. 222000/- vide deed no. 21262 dated 28-12-2007 who further executed saledeed of thsi plot in favaour of Smt. Sudha Gautam W/o Sh. Kalicharan Gautam on payment of Rs. 240000/- vide deed no. 27032 dated 20-03-2009.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

40 Sh. Hukam Chand S/o Sh. Lala Ram through GPA Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Deshraj

H.NO. 2, type -1 , Jal Vihar , Lajpat Nagar & Village- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal, Haryana,

G-15, Ph-I,50 Sq. mts. Sh. Hukam Chand paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 172369 dated 28-08-1993 and paid 3000/- as land cost in 1994 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance.

Paid 5500/- as land cost upto 1994. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 15, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Hukam Chand S/o Sh. Lala Ram vide deed no. 1437 dated 28.04.2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

41 Smt. Sundari W/o Sh. Vijender Singh(original allottee Sh. Jitender Kumar S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram)

Vill- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal,

G-60, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Sh. Jitender Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 16848 dated 03-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 60, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Jitender Kumar S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram vide deed no. 7617 dated 27.08.2010 who furtehr executed saledeedof this plot in favour of Smt. Neelam Garg on payment of 200000/- vide deed no. 8307 dated 10-09-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sundari W/o Sh. Vijender Singh on payment of Rs. 720000/- vide deed no. 26477 dated 19-03-2013.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

42 Smt. Maya W/o Kishan Singh(original allottee Sh. Ajay S/o Sh. Bishan Goyal)

Village- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal,

G-22, Ph-I, 50- sqmts. Sh. Ajay paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 356692 dated 07-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 320/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 28-07-1996.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 22, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Sh. Ajay S/o Sh.Bishan Goyal vide deed no. 1434 dated 28.04.2010 who through GPA further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Ms. Komal Sorut D/o Sh. Zile Singh on payment of RS. 720000/- vide

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

deed no.24246 dated 14-02-2013 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Maya W/o Kishan Singh on payment of Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 3844 dated 19-07-2017.

43 Smt. Meena Chaudhary W/o Sh. Pradeep Chaudhary(original Allottee Smt.Madhu Chauhan )

Village- Banchari, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt- Faridabad,

G-20, Ph-I,50 Sq. mts. Smt. Madhu Chauhan paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 882046 dated 06-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 21-07-1996.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 20, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Smt. Madhu Chauhan W/o Sh. Shish Pal Chauhan vide deed no. 1433 dated 28.04.2010 who through GPA further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Ms. Komal Sorut D/o Sh. Zile Singh on payment of RS. 720000/- vide deed no.24173 dated 13-02-2013 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Meena chaudary W/o Sh. Pradeep chaudary on payment of Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 3767 dated 13-07-2017.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

44 Smt. Mithlesh W/o Sh. Meharchand ( original allottee Sh. Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Kanhiya Lal)

Village- Banchari, Tehsil- Hodal, Distt- Palwal, Haryana,

G-234, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards As per claimant she does not received payment receipt from the original allottee.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 234, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Surinder Kumar S/o Sh. Kanhiya Lal vide deed no. 890 dated 19-04.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Mahesh Gupta S/o Sh. Trilok chand Gupta on payment of 277500/- vide deed no. 2653 dated

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

18-05-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kajal Goyal W/o sh. Umesh Kumar on payment of Rs. 280000/- vide deed no. 6472 dated 30-07-2010 who further execuited saledeed in favour of Smt. Pinky W/o Sh. Kishan Kumar on payment of Rs. 720000/- vide deed no. 26479 dated 19-03-2013 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Mithlesh W/o Sh. Meharchand on paymen tof Rs. 800000/- vide deed no. 3750 dated 12-07-2015.

45 Smt. Dharamwati W/o Sh. Chanderpal(original allottee Sh. Kishan Kumar S/o Sh. Amarnath)

Village- Prithla, Distt- Palwal,

G-10, Ph-1, 60 Sq. Yards Claimant produced photo copy of receipt of amount RS. 1000 and 480/- dated 20-10-1994 and 1-08-1996. As per photo copy of receipt also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1996. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 15-12-2008.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 10, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Kishan Kumar S/o Sh. Amarnath Vide deed no. 2548 dated 17.05.2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Surinder Tyagi S/o Sh. Rajbir Singh on payment RS. 277500/- vide deed no.3506 dated 3-06-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Kamlesh Gupta W/o Sh. Ajay Gupta on payment of Rs. 277500/- vide deed no. 7027 dated 13-08-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. meena W./o Sh.Davinder kumar on payment of

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

RS,. 420000/- vide deed no. 1742 dt 3-05-2011 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Dharamwati W/o Sh. Chanderpal on paymen tof RS. 720000/- vide deed no. 26468 dated 19-03-2013.

46 Sh. D.K Bhatia through Smt. Veena Bhatia

H.No. 1177, Sector- 28, Faridabad, Haryana-121008,

H-223, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. D.K. Bhatia paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 918041 dated 27-12-1994 and also paid 4800/- as land cost in 1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

Claimant paid RS. 5400/- as land cost and as per the allotment letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-223 was allotted as per draw dated 18-11-1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

47 Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Basant Kumar (original allottee Sh. Ram Bhoj)

Vill- Ram Sara Tal, Tehsil- Rajgarh, Distt- Churu, Rajasthan

G-310, Ph-I,50 Sq. mts. Sh. Ram Bhoj paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 16894 dated 06-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 17-10-1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 310, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Ram Bhoj S/o Sh. Bago ram vide deed no. 1435 dated 28.04.2010 who further executed saledeed through GPA of this plot in favour of Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Basant Kumar on payment of 720000/- vide deed no. 24175 dated 13-02-2013

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

48 Smt. Shalini Devi W/o Sh. Chander Prakash(original Allottee Sh. Dal Chand)

2528/16, Faridabad,

G-108, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Sh. Dal Chand paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD dated 07-09-1993 and as per photo copy of receipt paid 3480/- in year 1994-1997. The Claimant also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 12-

Paid Rs.5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. G-108 in favour of Sh. Dal Chand S/o Sh. Har bhajan on payment of Rs. 6000/- vide deed no. 5927dated

As per list of successful candidates provided by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

12-1994. 21-07-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Mahesh S/o Sh. Trilok Chand on payment of Rs. 140000/- vide deed no.6022 dated 22-07-2010 who further executed deed in favour of Smt. Shalini Devi W/o Sh. Chander Prakash on payment of 277500/- vide deed no. 12876 dated 07-12-2010.

49 Sh. Ravindra Nath S/o Sh. Kushi Ram

C/o B.R Chawla Advocate, Guru Nanak Colony, Pehowa, Distt- Kurukshetra,

H-335, 60 Sq. yards Sh. Ravindra Nath paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 938148 dated 26-12-1994 and paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

50 Sh. Chand Krishan S/o Sh. Barkat Ram

Qr. No. 118, Road no. 4, Andrews Ganj, New Delhi- 110049,

H-195, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Chand Krishan paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 227907 dated 14-12-1994 and paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

51 Sh. Sushil Kumar S/o Sh. Gurubaksh Lal

H.No. 1371, Sector- 12, R.K Puram, New Delhi, 60 Sq. Yards

H-418, 60 Sq.yards. Sh. Sushil Kumar paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no.227908 dated 14-12-1994 and paid 4800/- as land cost on 15-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 15-12-1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

52 Smt. Rashmi Devi W/o Anil Kumar(original

H.No.240, Sector-37, Faridabad,

G-106, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Sh. Khushi Ram, paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 160, Block-G, Ph-I, 60

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

allottee Sh. Khushi Ram S/o Sh. Tapan Ram)

292213 dated 28-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995

sq.yard on payment of 5980 /- in favour of Sh. Khushi Ram vide deed no. 10511 dated 03-07-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Trishla Devi W/o Sh. JAi Prakash on payment of 222000/- vide deed no.10611 dated 01-08-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour ofSmt. Rashmi Devi W/o Anil Kumar on payment of Rs. 233500/- vide deed no. 16557 dated 13-10-2008.

draw held in 1994.

53 Smt. Madhu Mittal W/o Sh. Naresh Mittal(original Allotte Dhalu Ram)

H.No.1, Gali Aggarwal Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad,

G-17, Ph-I, 50 Sq. mts. Sh. Dhalu Ram paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 41849 dated 04-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 17, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard on payment of 5980 /- in favour of Sh. Dhalu Ram S/o Sh. Gela Ram vide deed no. 10512 dated 31-07-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Nirmla Devi W/o Sh. Rahey Shyam on payment of 222000/- vide deed no.10610 dated 01-08-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Madhu Mittal W/o Sh. Naresh Mittal on payment of Rs. 233500/- vide deed no. 16558 dated 13-10-2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

54 Sh. Raj Kumar through GPA Khushboo Khandelwal D/o

H.No. 395, Sector-14, Faridabad, Haryana,

G-330, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards Sh. Raj Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 000445 dated 06-09-1993 and paid

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 330, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard on payment of 5980 /- in

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Sh. Shyamsunder Khandelwa

3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 16-09-1994

favour of Sh. Raj Kumar S/o Sh. Mange Ram vide deed no. 4602 dated 26-05-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Bala Garg w/o Sh. Anil Garg on payment of 222000/- vide deed no.7848 dated 30-06-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt.Sangeeta Gangwar W/o Sh. Chhabi nath Singh on payment of Rs. 222000/- vide deed no. 13122 dated 01-09-2008 who further given GPA to Khushboo Khandelwal D/o Sh. Shyamsunder Khandelwal vide GPA dated 23-03-2011 alongwith agreement to sell dated 23-03-2011 on payment of Rs. 700000/-

55 Sh. Suresh B Gupta S/o Sh. Bishamber Gupta through Sh. Arun Kumar Gupta S/o Late Sh. Jai Kishan Gupta

(i) F-26/1112 , sector -7 Rohini, Delhi-85 (ii)H.No. 94A, Arjun Nagar, New Delhi- 110029,

H-407, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards As per photocopy of receipt Sh. Suresh B Gupta paid Rs. 4800/- on 7-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance vide DD no.420585 dated 07-12-1995. No receipt of booking amount is available with the applicant. As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 claimant was infomred regarding allotment of plot no. H-407 through the draw held on 18-11-1995.

Paid 4800/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

56 Smt. Naveen Rani W/o sh. Satish Garg(Original Allottee Sh. D.C. Taneja)

Ward no. 6, Patram Nagar, Distt- Nakhana, Jind, Haryana,

G-29, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards As per photocopy of receipt Sh. D.C. Taneja paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 814807 dated 17-08-1993 and paid 3080/- as land cost in year

Paid 5580/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 29, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. on payment of 39000/- in

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-05-1995.

favour of Sh. D.C. Taneja S/o Sh. Hari Chand Taneja vide deed no. 8205 dated 26.07.2007( the photo copy of deed and receipt has been submitted by the applicant and told that the original deed and receipts have been misplaced, so he has also lodged the FIR dated 09-08-2017 in this regard) who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Narender Singh S/o Sh. Kalash Singh on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 12207 dated 24-09-2007, who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Ram Avtar S/o Sh. Jagdish Prasad on payment of RS. 222000/- vide deed no. 22411 dated 11-01-2008, who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Mr. Mayank Mittal S/o Sh. Giriraj Mittal on payment of Rs. 234000/- vide deed no. 93 dated 1-04-2008, who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Naveen Rani W/o sh. Satish Garg on payment of Rs. 222000/- vide deed no. 1158 dated 21-04-2009.

57 Sh. Narender Aggarwal S/o sh. Om Prakash(original allottee Smt.

1546, Greenfield Colony, Faridabad,

G-32, Ph-I,59.8 Sq. Yards Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 32, Block-G, Ph-I, 59.8 sqyd on payment of 5500 /- in favour of Smt. Murti Devi W/o Kanshi Ram vide deed no. 15989 dated 12-01-2006 who further executed

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 32, Block-G, Ph-I, 59.8 sqyd on payment of 5500 /- in favour of Smt. Murti Devi W/o Kanshi Ram vide deed no. 15989 dated 12-01-

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Murti Devi W/o Kanshi Ram)

saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Narender Aggarwal S/o sh. Om Prakash on payment of 240000/- vide deed no.4316 dated 20-05-2008.

2006 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Narender Aggarwal S/o sh. Om Prakash on payment of 240000/- vide deed no.4316 dated 20-05-2008.

58 Smt. Veena Kumari W/o Sh. Devender Kumar( Original Allottee Sh. Umrao Singh)

H.No. 1177, Sector- 28, Faridabad, Haryana-121008,

G-30, Ph-I,60 Sq. Yards As per photo copy of letter dated 8-08-1994 developer informed Sh. Umrao Singh regarding allotment of plot no. G-30 alloted through draw held on 30-07-1996. As per photo copy of receipt Sh. Umrao Singh paid Rs.3480/- as land cost in year 1994 -1996 and also paid Rs. 310 as intrest free Security for maintenance on 20-08-1994. Claimant also produced copy of FIR lodged by Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Umaro singh dated 10-08-2007 regarding lost of receipts. Claimant also produced copy of Death Certificate of Sh. Umrao Singh dated 10-04-2002

Developer executed saleded on plot no. 30 block J area 60 sqyd on paymen tof 6000/- in favour of Sh. Umrao Singh S/o Sh. Chander Bhan vide deed no. 8903 dated 22-09-2010 . Sh. Umrao Singh was expired on 20-11-1995 but as per registry dated 6-05-2011 Sh. Umrao executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Veena Kumari W/o Sh. Devender Singh on payment of Rs. 420000/- vide deed no. 1938 dated 6-05-2011 but from perusal of record Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Lt. Sh. Umrao Singh received the payment from the claimant.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

59 Sh. Dalip Chawla through GPA Mahesh Goyal S/o Sh. Trilok Chand Goyal

Kashba Kandhla, Distt- Shamli, U.P

G-53, Ph-II, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Dalip Chawla paid Rs. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 3014 dated 07-09-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 2-11-1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

60 Ms. Komal Sorout D/o Sh. Zile Singh(original allottee Sh. Parveen Kumar)

H.No. 263, Sector- 8, Faridabad

G-48, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Parveen Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 391826 dated 06-09-1993. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no.

Developer executed saleded on plot no. 48 block G area 60 sqyd on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Parveen kumar vide deed no.9170 dated 09-08-2007 who further

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

G-48 was allotted through darw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3000/- as land cost in year 1994 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 04-10-1994.

executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 222000/- in favour of Smt. archna Gupta W/o Sh. BHupesh Gupta vide deed no. 9824 dated 17-08-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Santosh Gupta W/o Sh. Sudhir Gupta on paymen tof 222000/- vide deed no. 23467 dated 24-01-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Suman Bansal W/o Latit Kumar bansal on payment of Rs. 240000/- vide deed no. 6195 dated 17-07-2009who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Ms. Komal Sorout D/o Sh. Zile Singh on payment of Rs. 900000/- vide deed no. 2583 dated 28-05-2018.

61 Ms. Komal Sorout D/o Sh. Zile Singh(original allottee Smt. Devindri)

H.No. 263, Sector- 8, Faridabad

G-251, Ph-I, 60 Sq. yards Smt. Devindre paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 966687 dated 4-10-1993. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-251 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 2000/- as land cost in year 1994-1995 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 12-01-1995.

Developer executed saleded on plot no. 251 block G, phase-I area 60 sqyd on payment of 6000/- in favour of Smt. Divendri D/o Sh. Shyam Sunder vide deed no.5943 dated 21-07-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 277500/- in favour Ms. Komal Sorout D/o Sh. Zile Singh Sorout vide deed no. 6255 dated 26-07-2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

62 Sh. Ram Kumar through GPA Sh. Atul Kumar S/o Sh.

IIIrd A, 152, Nehru Nagar, Gaziabad

G-244, Ph-I, 62 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 addressed to Sh. Ram Kumar plot 244 , block G was allotted through draw of

Paid Rs. 3480 /- as land cost in year 1994-1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

Sunil Kumar Gupta lots held on 30-07-1994 . Claimant paid RS. 3480 /- as land cost in year 1994-1996.

draw held in 1994.

63 Sh. Sanjeev Kumar through GPA Sh. Sachin Gupta S/o Sh. D.P Gupta

B-214, Lohia Nagar, Gazaiabad

G-300, Ph-I, 62 Sq. Yards Sh. Sanjeev Kumar paid Rs. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 9609 dated 22-09-1993 as per developer letter dated 8-08-1993 plot no. G-300 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid Rs. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 11-07-1996.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

64 Smt. Rajwanti W/o Sh. Ratti Ram(original allottee Sh. Ved Prakash)

Vill- Ghugher, Tehsil & Dsitt- Palwal

G-42, Ph-I, 60 Sq. yards Sh. Ved Prakash paid Rs. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 112186 dated 27-08-1993 and paid 3480/- as land cost in yera 1994-1996also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 14-02-1995. Phycisal possession handed on 16-08-1996. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-42 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 .

Developer executed saleded on plot no. 42 block G, phase-I area 60 sqyd on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Ved praksh S/o Ram narain vide deed no.25235 dated 15-02-2008 who through GPA further executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 720000/- in favour Smt. Pinky W/o Sh. KIshan Kuma vide deed no. 24172 dated 13-02-2013 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rajwanti W/o Sh. Ratti Ram on payment of Rs. 800000/- vide ded no. 3792 dtaed 14-07-2017.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

65 Smt. Raj Rani Sharma W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma(original allottee Sh. Kishan lal S/o Dunger

K.H 145A, Kavinagar, Gaziabad, U.P

G-154, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Kishan lal paid Rs. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 217279 dated 30-08-1993.As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-154 was allotted through draw of lots

Developer executed saleded on plot no. 154 block G, phase-I area 60 sqyd on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Kishan lal S/o Dunger Singh vide deed no.892 dated 19-04-2010 who further

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Singh ) held on 30-07-1994 . Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 07-10-1994. Phycisal possession handed on 21-07-1996.

executed saledeed of this plot on payment of Rs. 278000/- in favour Smt. Raj Rani Sharma W/o Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma vide deed no. 1322 dated 26-04-2010.

66 Smt. Meenu through Shurbhi

11,Chinar Appartment sector -9, Rohini Delhi 85

H-232, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 31-11-1995 plot no. H-232 was allotted through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995 . Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 11-12-1995 also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 11-12-1995.

Paid 4800/- as land cost upto 1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

67 Smt. Malti Devi W/o Sh. Narender Singh(original Allottee Sh. Satish Kumar)

H.No. J-118/22, Saurabh Vihar, Badarpur, New Delhi- 110044

G-327, Ph-I, 60 Sq. yards Sh. Satish Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 725816 dated 25-08-1993. As per developer letetr dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-327 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 21-07-1996.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 327, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Satish Kumar S/o Sh. Kanti Lal Vide deed no. 3682 dated 12-05-2008 who through GPA Sh. Narender Singh executed further saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Malti Devi W/o Sh. Narender Singh on payment RS. 222000/- vide deed no.4434 dated 22-05-2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

68 Sh. Surender Kumar through GPA Sh. Narender Singh S/o Sh. Kailash Singh

H.No. J-118/22, Saurabh Vihar, Badarpur, New Delhi- 110044

H-197, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-197 was allotted through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995 Claimant paid 4820/- as land cost on 15-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 15-12-1995.

Paid Rs.4820/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

69 Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Dinesh Garg(original

958/19, Faridabad G-304, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Nabha Kumar Samanta paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 304, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard. on payment of 39000/- in

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

Allottee Nabha Kumar Samanta)

DD no. 599953 dated 03-09-1993 .As per developer letetr dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-304 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid Rs. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 14-07-1996.

favour of Sh. Nabha Kumar Samanta S/o Satkari Samanta Vide deed no. 20381 dated 18-12-2007 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Dinesh Sharma S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan Sharma on payment RS. 222000/- vide deed no.1510 dated 24-04-2009 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. R.C. Jain S/o Kabul chand Jain on payment of 100000/- vide deed no. 715 dated 15-04-2010 who further excuted sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Geeta Garg W/o Dinesh Garg on paymen tof 277500/- vide deed no. 12877 dated 7-12-2010 .

draw held in 1994.

70 Sh. Manoj Jain through Smt. Anita Gupta W/o Sh. Arun Gupta

H.No. 94A, Arjun Nagar, New Delhi- 110029

H-219, Ph-II, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-219 was allotted through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 14-12-1995 and also paid Rs. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

Paid Rs.4800/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

71 Smt. Lokesh Singhla D/o Sh. Ramesh Chand(original Allottee Ms. Sudha D/o sh. Karan Singh)

H.No. B-41, Ashoka Enclave Part-II, Faridabad

G-239, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 2-07-1996 allottee had been asked to paid the balance Rs. 480 towards the cost of plot. As per claimant he does not have any payment receipt except this letter.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 239, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Ms. Sudha D/o Sh. Karan Singh Vide deed no. 10514 dated 29-07-2008 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Pushpa Devi W/o Sh. Ramesh chand on payment Rs. 222000/- vide deed no.18626 dated 11-11-

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

2008. The plot was transferred in favour of Smt.Lokesh Singla D/o Sh. Ramesh chand vide transferred deed no. 6965 dated 27-08-2014.

72 Sh. Mani Ram S/o Sh. Ram Swroop through GPA Sh. Sumit Mittal S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar Mittal

H.No. 774, Sector- 19, Faridabad.

G-262, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Mani Ram paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 319939 dated 06-10-1993. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-262 was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994. Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 3-10-1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 262, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyard. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Sh. Mani Ram S/o Sh. Ram Swroop vide deed no. 2503 dated 17.05.2010

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

73 Smt. Shalu Gopalka W/o Sh. Sanjay Gopalka (original allottee Mrs. Sushma)

197, Groud Floor, Block-A, Sainik Colony, Near D.A.V Public School, Sector- 49, Faridabad

G-9, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Mrs. Sushma paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 249999 dated 07-09-1993. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-9, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost/development charge upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 9, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyard. on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Mani Ram S/o Mrs. Sushma Gupta W/o H.B Gupta vide deed no. 2829 dated 24.05.2010 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Shalu Gopalka W/o Sh. Sanjay Gopalka on payment of 2,77,500/- vide deed no. 5107 dated 02.07.2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

74 Sh. Vimal Gupta S/o Sh. Ramprakash Gupta(original allottee Smt.

2353/16, Faridabad

G-257, Ph-I, 59.89 Sq. Yards Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. G-257, Ph-I, 59.89 Sq. Yards on payment of 35880/- in favour of Smt. Promila Rani W/o Sh. Subhash Dagar vide deed no. 7566 dated 31.08.2005.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. G-257, Ph-I, 59.89 Sq. Yards on payment of 35880/- in favour of Smt. Promila Rani W/o Sh. Subhash Dagar vide deed no.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Promila Rani ) 7566 dated 31.08.2005 who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Rajbala W/o Sh. Satbir on payment of 60000/- vide deed no. 12452 dated 26.09.2007. who further executed of this plot in favoar of Smt. Rashmi Arora W/o Sh. Sunil Arora on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 22047 dated 09.01.2008. who further executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Vimal Gupta S/o Sh. Ramprakash Gupta on payment of 234000/- vide deed no. 92 dated 01.04.2008.

75 Sh. Vikram Singh S/o Umed Singh through GPA Sh. Vijay Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Goyal

H.No. 445, Sector- 13, HUDA, Dabara Chowk, Hisar

H-249, 50 Sqmt. Sh. Vikram Singh S/o Umed Singh paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 219508 dated 23.12.1994. As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 Plot no. H-249, 50 Sqmt. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 15.12.1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994.

Paid 5400/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

76 Sh. Vijay Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Goyal

H.No. 445, Sector- 13, HUDA, Dabara Chowk, Hisar

H-401, 50 Sqmt. Sh. Vijay Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Goyal paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 219507 dated 24.12.1994. As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 Plot no. H-401, 50 sqmt. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995. Claimant paid

Paid 5400/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

4800/- as land cost on 15.12.1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

77 Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Rati Ram through GPA Sh. Vijay Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Goyal

H.No. 445, Sector- 13, HUDA, Dabara Chowk, Hisar

G-14, Ph-I, 50 sqmt. Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Rati Ram paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 718614 dated 01.09.1993. As per developer letter dated 08.08.1994 Plot no. G-14, PH-I, 50 sqmt. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 20.07.1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994-96.

Paid 4980/- as land cost/development charge upto 1994-96.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

78 Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Om Prakash through GPA Sh. Vijay Kumar Goyal S/o Sh. Om Prakash Goyal

H.No. 445, Sector- 13, HUDA, Dabara Chowk, Hisar

H-286, 50 Sqmt. Sh. Krishan Kumar S/o Sh. Om Prakash paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 506257 dated 31.12.1994. As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 Plot no. H-286, 50 sqmt. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 19.12.1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

79 Smt.Mamta Sharma W/o Late Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma

H.No. C-654, JVTS Garden, Chhattarpur, New Delhi- 110074

H-281, 60 Sq. Yards Smt.Mamta Sharma W/o Late Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 228026 dated 29.12.1994. As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 Plot no. H-281, 60 sqyd. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 18.12.1995 and

Paid 5400/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

80 Sh. Janardan Pokhriyal S/o U.R Pokhriyal

D-10A, Brij Vihar, Chander Nagar, Gaziabad, Uttaradesh 201011

H-413, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 30.11.1995 Plot no. H-413, 60 sqyd. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 16.12.1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

Paid 4800/- as land cost/development charge upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

81 Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Umrao Singh throgh SPA Smt. Trishla Devi W/o Sh. Jaiprakash

H.No. 1339, Sector- 37, Faridabad

G-46, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Umraw Singh paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 95550 dated 06.09.1993. As per developer letter dated 08.08.1994 Plot no. G-46, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994-96.

Paid 5980/- as land cost/development charge upto 1994-96. Developer exeucted sale deed of plot no. G-46, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Anil Kumar S/o Umrao Singh on payment of 4980/- vide deed no. 10513 dated 10.07.2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

82 Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Gupta (original allottee Sh. Ravinder Bansal S/o Late Sh. Girdhar Mal Bansal)

617/2, Ahir wara old Faridabad

G-158, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Developer exeucted sale deed of plot no. G-158, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards in favour of Sh. Ravinder Bansal S/o Sh. Late Sh. Girdhar Mal Bansal on payment of 39000/- vide deed no. 20379 dated 18.12.2007. As per claimant he does not have payment receipts.

Paid 39000/- as land cost/development charge as per registry dated 18.12.2007 Sh. Ravinder Bansal S/o Sh. Late Sh. Girdhar Mal Bansal exeucted further sale deed of this plot in favour of Sh. Dinesh Sharma S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 21096 dated 27.12.2000, who furhter executed sale deed of this plot in favour of Smt. Usha Gupta W/o Sh. Rajesh Kumar on payment of 222000/- vide deed no. 23446

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

dated 24.01.2008.

83 Sh. Deepak Matta S/o Sh. Shyam Lal Matta and Sh. Sushil Kumar jain S/o Sh. M.R Jain (original allottee Smt. loungshri )

1091/44, DDA Flats Kalka Ji, New Delhi- 110049

G-325, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dated 08.08.1994 Plot no. G-325, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-97 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994.

Original booking receipt is misplaced as per claimant. Developer exeucted sale deed of plot no. G-325, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards in favour of Smt. loungshri W/o Sh. Dharamvir on payment of 39000/- vide deed no. 23830 dated 29-01-2008, who through GPA Sh. Dayanand executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Deepak Matta S/o Sh. Shyam Lal Matta and Sh. Sushil Kumar jain S/o Sh. M.R Jain on payment of 230000/- vide deed no. 286 dated 3-04-2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

84 Sh. JP Deshwal S/o Sh. Sultan Singh

H.No. 2435, H.B.C, Sector- 01, Rohtak

H-258, 50 Sq. Meter Sh. J.P. Deshwal paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 677635 dated 30-12-1994. As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-258 , 50 Sq. meter was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995. As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

85 Smt. Mahli W/o Sh. Sukhdev Singh through GPA Sh. Dilip Singh S/o Sh. Sukhdev

Village & Post- Baliyana, Rohtak

H-257, Ph-II, 60 Sq. Yards Smt. Mahli paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 677643 dated 30-12-1994. As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-257 , 50 Sq. meter was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995. As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-12- 1995.

86 Sh. Surender Kumar S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram

H.No. 2445, H.B.C, Sector- 01, Rohtak

H-298, 50 Sq. Meter Sh. Surender Kumar paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 677645 dated 31-12-1994. As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-298 , 50 Sq. meter was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995. As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

87 Sh. Krishan lal S/o Sh. Gyani Ram

Vill & Post- Laahli, Rohtak

H-305, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Krishan Lal paid RS. 600/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 677647 dated 30-12-1994. As per developer letter dated 30-11-1995 plot no. H-305 , 50 Sq. meter was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 18-11-1995. Claimant paid 4800/- as land cost on 13-12-1995 and also paid RS. 300/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 13-12-1995.

Paid 5400/- as land cost upto 1995. As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

88 Smt. Karuna Madan W/o Sh. Anil Madan through SPA Sh. Sumit Mittal S/o Sh. Vinod Mittal

774, Sector- 19, Faridabad

G-261, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Developer executed saledeed of plot no. G-261 , ph-I , 60 sqyd. In favour of Smt. Karuna Madan W/o Sh. Anil Madan on payment of Rs. 5980/- vide deed no. 879 dated 19-04-2010.

As per the claimant he does not have any payment receipt/allotment letter.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

89 Sh. Naresh Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary( original allottee

H.No. 776, Sector- 21C, Faridabad

G-316, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sh. Naveen Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration of EWS plot vide DD no. 032884 dated 02.09.1993. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 Plot no.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer executed saledeed of plot no. G-316 , Ph-I, 60 sqyd on payment of Rs. 6000/- in favour of Sh. Naveen Kumar S/o Sh. Nand Lal

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Sh. Naveen Kumar S/o Sh. Nand LaL)

G-316 , 50 sqmt. was allotted to the claimant through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994. Claimant paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in year 1994.

vide deed no. 5922 dated 21-07-2010, who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sh. Naresh Chaudhary S/o Late Sh. Vidya Sagar Chaudhary on payment of RS. 277500/- vide deed no. 6296 dated 27-07-2010 . Physical possession was handed over to claimant on 30-07-1996.

90 Smt. Kamlesh Sharma W/o Gyan Prakash Sharma

H.No. 11, Ward No. 8, Moh. Bardi Para, Old Faridabad.

G-52, 50 Sq. Mtr. Paid 2500/- at the time of submission of application vide DD no. 374642 dated 20-08-1993 by Smt. Kamlesh Sharma. As per developer letter dated 8-08-1994 plot no. G-52 was allotted through draw of lots dated 30-04-1994. Cliamant paid 3000/- in year 1994. and also paid 310/- as interest free security against maintenance on 06-12-1994.

Paid Rs.5500/- as land cost upto 1994. The balance amount is to be deposited at the time of posession.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

91 Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar ( Smt. Mitlesh Kumari original allottee)

Village-Banchari, Tehsil-Hodal, Dist. Palwal.

236, Block-G, PH-I, 50 sqyd. Smt.Mitlesh Kumari paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 477914 dated 07-09-1993 . As per developer letter dt 8-08-94 plot no. G-236 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in 1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 236, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 5980/- in favour of Smt.Mitlesh Kumari W/o Sh. Bharat Singh vide deed no. 8920 dated 22.09.2010 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Sunita W/o Sh. Ashok Kumar on payment of 277500/- vide deed no.10995 dated 04-11-2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

92 Smt. Babli W/o Sh. Harsh Kumar(original allottee Smt.

Village-Banchari, Tehsil-Hodal, Dist. Palwal.

312, Block-G, PH-I, 60 sqyd. Smt. Shashi Basra paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 61438 dated 04-08-1993 . As per

Paid 4500/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 312, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sq.mts. on payment of 6000/- in

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Shashi Basra) developer letter dt 8-08-94 plot no. G-312 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 2000/- as land cost in year 1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in 1996.

favour of Smt. Shashi Basra W/o Sh. Ashok Basra vide deed no. 95919 dated 21-08-2010 who further GPA executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Babli W/o Sh. Harsh Kumar on payment of 200000/- vide deed no.7309 dated 19-08-2010.

93 Smt. Sudha Aggarwal W/o Sh. B.L Aggarwal (original allottee Sh. Shiv Prasad S/o Sh. Kishan Chaudary )

BL-1FL 6C, 5J.B.S, Halden Avenue Dhapa S.O Dhapa South Twenty Four Pregnants, West Bangal

G-231, Ph-I, 60 Sq. yard. As per claimant he does not have payment receipt

Paid 6000/- as land cost as per saledeed dated 28-04-2010. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 231, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard on payment of 6000/- in favour of Sh. Shiv Prasad S/o Sh. Kishan Chaudary vide deed no. 1448 dated 28-04-2010 who further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Mahesh Gupta S/o Sh. Trilok chand on payment of 277500/- vide deed no.1685 dated 30-04-2010 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. Sudha Aggarwal W/o Sh. B.L Aggarwal on payment of RS. 277500/- vide deed no./ 6473 dated 30-07-2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

94 Smt. Renu Goyal W/o Lalit Goyal (original Allottee Smt.Deepa Thakur W/o Sh. Roop Chand)

2169, Sector- 16, Faridabad

G-71, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per claimant he does not have payment receipt

Paid 39000/- as land cost as per saledeed dated 18-12-2007 Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 71, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sq.yard on payment of 39000/- in favour of Smt.Deepa Thakur W/o Sh. Roop Chand vide deed no. 20375 dated 18-12-2007 who

Name/plot no. Is not in the list of sucessful candidates in draw held on 30-07-1994 for G block. The applicant could not produced any document with regard to booking of plot. In

further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Vinay Sharma S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan on payment of 222000/- vide deed no.21291 dated 28-12-2007 who further executed Smt. Renu Goyal W/o Lalit Goyal saledeed of this plot in favour of on payment of RS. 222000/- vide deed no. 23444 dated 24-01-2008.

case of 5% quota of allotment with the developer, the allotment of plot is done through draw.

95 Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary (Original Allottee Vipin Kumar S/o sh. Kundan Lal)

776, Sector-21C Faridabad

G-303, Ph-I, 60 Sqyd. Sh. Vipin Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration on 5-09-1993. As per developer letter dt 8-08-1994 plot no. G-303 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in 1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 303, Block-G, Ph-I, 60 sqyd. on payment of 5980 /- in favour of Vipin Kumar S/o sh. Kundan Lal vide deed no. 10508 dated 31-07-2008 who further executed saledeed in favour of Sunita D/o Sh. Kishan Chand on payment of 222000/- vide deed no 11077 dated 08-08-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Naresh Chaudhary W/o Sh. S.K Chaudhary on payment of RS. 720000/- vide deed no. 27127 dated 25-03-2013.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

96 Smt. Ritu Jindal W/o Sh. Surender Kumar (original allottee Shish Pal Sing S/o Sh. Nihal Singh

H.No. 613, Sector- 37, Tehsil & Distt- faridabad, Haryana

G-69, Ph-I, 50 Sq.mts. As per developer letter dt 8-08-1994 plot no. G-69 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-1996 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance in 1996.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 69, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sqmts. on payment of 5980 /- in favour of Shish Pal Singh S/o Sh. Nihal Singh vide deed no. 15975 dated 10-03-1997 who through SPA executed saledeed on this plot in favour of

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

Sh. J.C Sharma S/o Sh. K.C. Sharma on payment of 263000/- vide deed no 4897 dated 7-07-2005 who further executed saledeed of this pot in favour of Smt. Trishla Devi W/o Jai Prakash on payment of RS. 275000/- vide deed nop. 29382 dated 31-03-2008 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Ritu Jindal W/o Sh. Surender Kumar on payment of Rs. 300000/- vide deed no. 21134 dated 16-12-2008.

97 Smt. Jyoti Singla W/o Sh. Harish Kumar (original allottee Sh. Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Brij Lal)

A-68, Jharia Market, Palla No. 2, Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad

G-332, Ph-I, 60 Sq. yards Sh. Ashok Kumar paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide dd no. 168 on 7-09-1993 and also paid Rs. 3480/-as land cost in year 1994-1996. As per developer letter dt 8-08-1994 plot no. G-332 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and also paid RS. 310/- as intrest free Security for maintenance on 27-12-1996.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 332, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sqmts. on payment of Rs. 5980 /- in favour of Ashok Kumar S/o Sh. Brij Lal vide deed no. 15970 dated 10-03-1997 who through SPA further executed saledeed in favour of Pervesh Kumar S/o Bhishan Swroop on payment of 8000/- vide deed no 2033 dated 10-05-1997 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Jyoti Singla W/o Sh. Harish Kumar on payment of RS. 222000/- vide deed no. 15340 dated 26-09-2008.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

98 Sh. Inderpal Singh Alagh S/o Late Sh. Rajinder Singh Alagh(original

H.No. 27, Road no. 19, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi

254, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sqmts.

Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. 254, Block-G, Ph-I, 50 sqmts. . on payment of 5980 /- in favour of Sh. Mohan Singh S/o Sh. Jait Singh vide deed

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

allottee Sh. Mohan Singh S/o Sh. Jait Singh )

no. 15971 dated 10-03-1997 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Sh. BIshan Singh Rawat S/o Sh. Khem Singh on payment of 7500/- vide deed no 5129 dated 02-07-1997 who further executed saledeed of this plot in favour of Smt. Sudha Rani on payment of RS. 48000/- vide deed nop. 4642 dated 12-06-2007 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Garg W/o Sh. Sandeep Garg on payment of Rs. 222000/- vide deed no. 2587 dated 30-04-2008 who further executed saledeed in favour of Rajinder Singh Alagh on payment on 220000/- vide saledeed 9718 dated22-07-2008. As per reliqusedeed no. 1303 dated 24-04-2012 sh. Inderpal Singh Alagh is owner of the plot.

99 Sh. Sanjay Kumar s/o Sh. Hansraj

Village- Mindkola, Tehsil- Hathin, Distt- Palwal, Haryana

28, Block-G,50 sqmts. As per receipt produced by claimant Rs. 3000/- as land cost paid in year 1994-1995. Claimant also produced Counter file of Bank Slip of amount RS. 5120/- dated 14-12-1995 payable to durga Builder but he informed that he does not have any payment receipt from developer.

Paid 8100/- as land cost upto 1996.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

100 Sh. Surender Singh Bisht S/o Sh. S.S Bisht through GPA Sh. Rakesh Jindal S/o Sh. Sukhdev Jindal (original allotee Smt. Lalita Kumari)

A-162, Vill- Katwaria Sarai, Hauz Khas, South West Delhi- 110016

G-2, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Smt. Lalita Kumari D/o Sh. Gyan Chand paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 283867 dated 04.09.1993 . As per developer letter dt 8-08-94 plot no. G-2 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3000/- as land cost in year 1994.

Paid 5500/- as land cost upto 1994. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. G-02, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards on payment of 6000/- in favour of Ms. Lalita Kumari D/o Sh. Gyan Chand vide deed no. 887 dated 19.04-2010 who further executed saledeed in favour of Sh. Surender Kumar Bisht on payment of

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

227500/- vide deed no. 1981 dated 06.05.2010.

101 Sh. Narpal Singh S/o Sh. Nityanand

Vill & PO- Musepur, Tehsil & Distt- Rewari, Haryana,

G-333, 50 Sq. Yards Sh. Narpal Singh S/o Sh. Nityanand paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 112188 dated 27.08.1993 . As per developer letter dt 8-08-94 plot no. G-333 was allotted through draw of lots held on 30-07-1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 claimant also paid 310 towards scrutiny fee maintenance charge.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1994-96. No sale deed of this plot executed.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

102 Sh. Hari Om Tiwari S/o Sh. K.S Tiwari

H.No. 565, Sector- 05, R.K Puram, New Delhi- 110022,

293, Block-H, 60 sqyd. As per developer letter dt 31.11.1995 plot no. 293, Block-H, 60 sqyd. was allotted through draw of lots held on 18.11.1995 and paid 4800/- as land cost in year 1995 and also paid 300/- as scrutiny free maintenance charge.

Paid 4800/- as land cost upto 1995.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.

103 Smt. Archana Mittal W/o Sh. Nareh Mittal ( original allottee Sh. Somnath )

E-17, Block-B-1, Extn, Mohan Corporative Induatrial Estate, Badarpur, New Delhi,

G-104, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sq. Yards

As per developer letter dt 08.08.1994 plot no. G-104, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sq. Yards was allotted through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 and also paid 310/- as scrutiny free maintenance charge in year 1994.

Paid 3480/- as land cost upto 1994-96 as per the claimant booking receipt is not available or is misplaced. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. G-104, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards Sq. Yards on payment of Rs. 6000 /- in favour of Sh. Somnath S/o Sh. Hardayal vide deed no. 7616 dated 27.08.2010 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Archana Mittal W/o Sh. Nareh Mittal on payment of 240000/- vide deed no 7623 dated 27.08.2010.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

104 Smt. Seema W/o Sh. Gyan Singh (original allottee

Village- Sihi, Sector- 08, Tehsil- Ballabgarh, Distt-

G-54, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per developer letter dt 08.08.1994 plot no. G-54, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards was allotted through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994

Paid 3480/- as land cost upto 1994-96 as per the claimant booking receipt is not available or

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS

Sh. Surender Singh)

Faridababd, and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 and also paid 310/- as scrutiny free maintenance charge in year 1994.

is misplaced. Developer exeucted saledeed of plot no. G-54, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards on payment of Rs. 6000 /- in favour of Sh. Surender Singh S/o Sh. Pokhar Dass vide deed no. 5923 dated 21.07.2010 who further executed saledeed in favour of Smt. Seema W/o Sh. Gyan Singh on payment of 277500/- vide deed no 6477 dated 23.07.2010.

draw held in 1994.

105 Sh. Parshotam Dass S/o Sh. Mangal Ram through his Son Sh. Dayanand

Vill & PO. Rahara, Tehsil. Assandh, Distt- Karnal (Haryana)

G-59, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards As per photocopy of documents Sh. Parshotam Dass paid RS. 2500/- at the time of submission of application/registration vide DD no. 122948 dated 06.09.1993 As per developer letter dt 08.08.1994 plot no. G-59, Ph-I, 60 Sq. Yards was allotted through draw of lots held on 30.07.1994 and paid 3480/- as land cost in year 1994-96 and also paid 310/- as scrutiny free maintenance charge in year 1994.

Paid 5980/- as land cost upto 1994-96. As per the claimant original booking receipt is with his uncle in whose name GPA was executed which has been now cancelled vide document no. 40 dated 30.08.2018 at Asand, Distt. Karnal. No saledeed executed.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1994.

106 Smt. Dharmo Devi W/o Sh. Dilip Singh through Sh. Krishan S/o Sh. Dilip Singh

Vill & Post- Baliyana, Rohtak

H-289, Ph-II, 60 sqyd. Claimant produced photocopy of cheque dated 12.12.1995 amounting 300/- & 4800/- payable to Durga Builder Pvt. Ltd. and is supported with receipt of the same amount by the developer for Plot No. H-289, Ph-II, 60 sqyd.

Claimant also produced copy of complaint regarding missing of documents dated 20.11.2018.No saledeed executed.

As per list of successful candidates signed by developer for the EWS draw held in 1995.


Recommended