SGSY NRLMDRDA as main implementation agency

Dedicated support organization from State to sub-district level to mobilize poor, and build and nurture their institutions

Community institutional architecture comprised of only SHGs

While SHGs remain the basic unit, higher order structures like SHG federations, producer organizations are planned for last mile service delivery and market access

Income generation focus of SHGs Scope to address multiple dimensions of poverty – assets, skills, incomes, consumption and risks (including food and health risks)

Economic activity focus on investment in common assets and activities

Economic activity focus for provision of support services and aggregation for access to markets

Convergence with social security and safety nets left unsaid

Convergence with other poverty reduction programs, social security schemes and safety nets particularly encouraged

SGSY vis-à-vis NRLMSGSY vis-à-vis NRLM

SGSY NRLMPredefined unit cost parameters Financing norms reflect entitlements based on

averages. States free to fix ceilings within overall framework

Subsidy linked bank credit a.Single time use of subsidy envisaged as it is linked to economic investmentb.limited doses of credit

Subsidy is a ‘resource in perpetuity’ and used as catalytic capital for leveraging bank finance. Engagement with banks all along the credit cycle with emphasis on repeat financeCo-invest in new developing new products and alternate service delivery mechanisms

Allocation based approach Demand based approach to achieve agreed outcomes in a ‘time bound manner’

Monitoring of physical and financial targets

Systematic monitoring of outcomes like-mobilization of all poor-quality of institutions-leverage of bank finance-Improvements in productivity and turnovers-coverage of social security and safety nets

SGSY vis-à-vis NRLM

All loan applications shall be disbursed by 31st December, 2011.

The district target to be distributed among the banks.

Only Group financing to be encouraged.

No grading to be done during the year

SHGs passed Grade-II test shall only be credit linked. Group application already sponsored during the year 2010-11 All SHGs belonging to disadvantaged groups(ST/ SC/ disabled etc)

should be preferred . Properly utilised the revolving fund for economic enhancement

SGSY STRATEGY FOR 2011-12

If Grade-II passed SHGs are not available then repeat financing to the vibrant SHGs following the norms.

Proper utilisation of the 1st dose of credit. Good repayment track record Groups adhering to the basic norms of SHG functioning such as

• Regular and proper financial transaction• Regular group meeting• Participation for decision making• Timely record keeping.

In exceptional cases , grading exercise may be conducted. Revolving funds to the newly formed SHGs can be extended to eligible ones.

Strategy TRIPTI covered blocksSHGs provided with pro poor inclusion fund should only be credit linked under

SGSY.DPM of TRIPTI will provide the list to the LDMs

• No need for grading test• No need to provide revolving fund under SGSY

SGSY STRATEGY FOR 2011-12

NRLM

Review of NRLM by Hon’ble CM on 11th Jan. 2011

NRLM- Odisha

Preparatory Meeting for Launching of NRLM 4th April 2011

Hon’ble CM Launching NRLM-Odisha18th April, 2011

Process Driven Intervention.

Enhancing and expanding existing livelihoods options.

Skill building for the job market.

Nurturing micro-enterprises.

Process Driven Intervention.

Enhancing and expanding existing livelihoods options.

Skill building for the job market.

Nurturing micro-enterprises.

11

APPROACH

Design of NRLM• Dedicated support organization for NRLM• Social mobilization of poor• Building institutional platforms for the poor• Developing pro-poor financial sector• Access to services and entitlements• Linking with markets• Gender empowerment

Sensitive Support Organization

NRLM -State Level Core Committee 29th March 2011

Strategy • External CRP for initial social mobilization• Staff exposure to best practices of IB, MF,

Livelihoods etc.• Formation and nurturing of federations• Entitlement to Federations• Social inclusion• Intensive Financial inclusion• Internal CRP strategy for horizontal coverage• Food security, social security• Livelihood enhancement

Expected Outcomes All poor and poorest are covered under SHGsAll SHGs switched over to panchasutrasAll SHGs are federated at Village levelAvailability of Trained social capitalCadre of para professionals functioning as sensitive

support systemSelf managed institutions of Poor at village,

cluster/block levelPoor HHs access multiple doses of investmentsCreation of sustainable livelihoodsEnhancement of HH level incomes

TRIPTI

• 10 Districts out of 30

• 38 Blocks

• 1020 GPs

• 8369 villages

• 12, 54, 607 Rural Families

• ST – 6.22%• SC – 20.19%

• Total Population : 56,24,689• [Source – Census 2001]

• Total SHG – 30, 000 (Approximately) [Source – Mission Shakti]

Project Coverage

PRINCIPLES OF IMPLEMENTATION

19

• TRIPTI will work with the women SHGs and their federations.

• It will work with poor and very poor based on the situational analysis.

• TRIPTI will work towards vulnerable, destitute and physically or

mentally challenged.

• SHGs and their federations will directly implement the Programme.

• Federations of SHGs at the GP level will directly receive funds from the

project.

• There will be no subsidy.

OBJECTIVES

20

PROJECT COMPONENTS

21

Process of Implementation

22

STRUCTURE OF COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS

Member Member Member Member Member

MISSION SHAKTI GROUP (MSG)

MISSION SHAKTI G.P. FEDERATION (MS-GPF)

MISSION SHAKTI G.P. FEDERATION (MS-GPF)

MISSION SHAKTI BLOCK FEDERATION (MS-BF)

MISSION SHAKTI CLUSTER FORUM (MS-CF)

MISSION SHAKTI CLUSTER FORUM (MS-CF)

5- 20 MSGs(1 to 2 Villages)

5- 20 MSGs(1 to 2 Villages)

10-20 Members(5-20 in case of

vulnerable Groups)

Representatives of Member CFs

Representatives of Member CFs

Representatives of Member GPFs

One Woman From each HH

SHAKTI SAHAYIKA(Community Resource

Person)

SHAKTI SAHAYIKA(Community Resource

Person)

Placement linked Skill Development Training Placement linked Skill Development Training ofof

Rural Youth Rural Youth

• Aim to bring the working age population of the state to the

economic mainstream, and to harness the demographic dividend

• The basic objective is to equip rural youths with marketable skills

to enhance their capacity to secure employment in the organised

sectorSTRATEGY

• Selected youths will be trained by identified training institutions to

provide necessary technical and soft skills

• After training, they will also be provided required assistance for

placement

Objective & Strategy

Bird’s eye view of Project– 26 Projects [Including 5 new projects

sanctioned recently by MoRD]• 24 Multi-state Projects • 01 State project

– Implemented by 21 PIAs [Project Implementing Agencies] covering 25 trades

– Coordinated by • NIRD• NABCONS • IGNOU• ORMAS

– ORMAS has been declared as Nodal Agency for Monitoring and Coordination of the project by the State Government.

Center verification by ORMAS team at JITM, CIT Jatni

Workshop on the program for BDOs, CE-DSMS, PIAs

Initiatives taken so far

Review meeting with PIAs & CE-DSMSs

Formation and functioning of Skill development cell

Holding review meetings with PIAs

Physical monitoring the placement of trained youths

by ORMAS

Developing Web based online application and MIS

Sensitization of Chief Executives of DSMS, BDOs

and Asst. computer programmers

State level and District Level Counseling camp for

selection of right aspirants

Chief Secretary reviews the programme

The program is named as “Mo Dakhyata”

Planned to train and place 60,000 unemployed rural

youth

Priority to LWE affected districts

Convergence with State Employment Mission

Planned to up-scale the counseling camps at District

level and counsel around 60,000 rural youth covering

all blocks through District level Counseling Camps

during May-Aug 2011

Present Strategy

Status of District level counseling campsDistrict Dates for counseling

campstatus District Dates for counseling

campStatus

Kalahandi 2nd - 7th May, 2011 Completed Baragarh 4th – 9th July 2011 Proposed

Khurda 2nd - 6th May, 2011 Completed Nyagarh 4th - 7th July 2011 Proposed

Deogarh 18th - 20th May 2011 Completed Angul 15th -17th July 2011 Proposed

Puri 1st - 6th June 2011 Completed Jjpur 12th -16th July 2011 Proposed

Keonjhar 24th - 30thJune 2011 Completed Sonepur 12th -13th July 2011 Proposed

Kendrapara 21st - 26th May 2011 Completed Dhenkanal 18th - 21st July 2011 Proposed

Nuapada 16th -17th May, 2011 Completed Baleswar 18th – 21st July 2011 Proposed

Sambalpur 18th -22nd May, 2011 Completed Rayagada 23rd-25th July 2011 Proposed

Sundargarh 9th - 15th June,2011 Completed Koraput 23rd-25th July 2011 Proposed

Bhadrak 23rd -26th May, 2011 Completed Cuttack 27th-29th July 2011 Proposed

Mayurbhanj 27th - 7th June, 2011 Completed Gajapati To be conformed

Balangir 16th - 23rd June 2011 Completed Malkanagiri To be conformed

Jagatsingpur 17th -20th June 2011 Completed Nabarangpur To be conformed

Kandhamal 28th June - 3rd July 2011 Completed Jharsuguda To be conformed

Ganjam 6th -13 June 2011 Completed Boudh To be conformed

Results of District level counseling camps

Dist Wise Report Target Tagged % of Achievement

BHADRAK 1400 577 41.21BALANGIR 2800 1719 61.39DEOGARH 600 349 58.17GANJAM 4400 3526 80.14JAGATSINGHAPUR 1600 1187 74.19KALAHANDI 2600 1184 45.54KANDHAMAL 2400 1009 40.00KENDRAPARA 2600 1308 50.31KENDUJHAR 2600 1322 50.85KHORDHA 2000 768 38.40MAYURBHANJ 5200 2387 45.90NUAPADA 1000 503 50.30PURI 2200 1264 57.45SAMBALPUR 1800 881 48.94SUNDARGARH 3400 2076 61.06

• Many college going students are coming to

counseling camp which shows improper counseling

& screening at block level.

• Around 30-40% applicants are coming with a mind

set for training not for job.

• The trade list provided are not followed up properly

as a result of which candidates are demanding un-

listed trades.

• Late “online apply” at block level, mostly at the last

moment.

Issues

• At times poor internet facility, Logistics facility at

district counseling camps

• In many places CE-DSMS taking all responsibility to

manage the camp

• In few places wrong/dummy photos uploaded by

CP/ACPs to generate TOKEN in place of candidates

photo.

• MG NREGA Job card numbers are not captured

• Less Female candidates are participating

Issues

Thank you