+ All Categories
Home > Education > UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

Date post: 29-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: steve-blank
View: 45,066 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
32
Diagnostics Cohort Week 1 UCSF Lean LaunchPad For Life Sciences October 1, 2013 Todd Morrill 1
Transcript
Page 1: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

1

Diagnostics Cohort Week 1

UCSF Lean LaunchPad For Life SciencesOctober 1, 2013

Todd Morrill

Page 2: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

2

Cohort D-1: LLP-LSdx

• What are we talking about?

• What are we doing here?

• Who are we?

• Why bother?

Page 3: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

3

What is a diagnostic?

What we used to think:

Product which attempts to classify of an individual's condition into separate and distinct categories that allow medical decisions about treatment and prognosis to be made.

Page 4: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

4

What is a diagnostic?

What we used to think:

Product which attempts to classify of an individual's condition into separate and distinct categories that allow medical decisions about treatment and prognosis to be made.

Page 5: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

5

What is a diagnostic?

What we now think:

Product which attempts to classify of an individual's condition into separate and distinct categories that allow medical decisions about treatment and prognosis to be made.

Product, service, process, data setIndividual, group, population…Medical, nutritional, genetic, social…Decisions, information…Treatment, status, history, future, behavior…Prognosis, history, potential…

Page 6: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

6

What changed?

• Biology (knowledge and understanding of human and other bio/medical systems)

• Technology (PCR, mass spec, TEM, antibodies, PET)

• Population – Aging, richer

Page 7: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

7

What changed?

• Biology (knowledge and understanding of human and other bio/medical systems)

• Technology (PCR, mass spec, TEM, antibodies, PET)

• Population – Aging, richer, risk averse, and less pizza, dude

Page 8: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

8

What changed?

• Biology (knowledge and understanding of human and other bio/medical systems)

• Technology (PCR, mass spec, TEM, antibodies, PET)

• Population – Aging, richer, risk averse, and less pizza, dude

Page 9: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

9

And the industry is changing too

Page 10: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

10

So what…?So: Value Propositions are Complex

• Testing is more varied, complex and generally available than 20 years ago, for example:– Detection / Change (progression) / Stratification / Prediction /

Predilection– Lab, home brew, RUO, POC, consumer, pet, vet, food etc.– Sensitivity can exceed understanding of meaning– Odd value propositions in some markets: “Diagnosis” vs

“cleanliness” uses

• Medical, industrial, consumer, behavioral etc.• Tests vs Dx: stratification, status, content, etc.• In vivo vs. in vitro testing• Companion diagnostics, biomarker sets, genetic profiling

and unicorns

Page 11: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

11

So what…? So: Business Models are changing

• Roche• Siemens• Danaher• Abbott• ThermoFisher• Becton Dickinson• Johnson & Johnson• Alere• Sysmex• bioMerieux• Bio-Rad

• Idexx• Digene/Qiagen• Genomic Health• OraSure• Myriad Genetics• GE• Hologic• Complete Genomics• Illumina• Asuragen• Sequenom

Largest Dx Companies Smaller Dx Companies

PLATFORM EXECUTORS TECHNOLOGY INNOVATORS

Page 12: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

12

Executors

Large marketsRoutine analysesInternational scopeLarge distribution networksManufacturing excellenceEstablished platforms

Niche marketsComplex analysesFocused salesTechnology superiorityNovel platforms

?

EntrepreneurialAgileNicheInnovative……beyond technology

Technologists Innovators

Page 13: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

13

Who is Todd and why is he here?NSF National Program Faculty

• In vitro diagnostic tests (Bio-Rad Labs $1.3B Dx development, manufacturing, vendor)– Human, animal, food

• In vivo diagnostic discovery (Oxford GlycoSciences)• Biopharma discovery (Trellis, Lilly, Baxter, Pfizer)• Research tools (Novex, Bio-Rad, IO Informatics)• What’s fun?

– New technology discovery and development– Entrepreneurship: 3 startups

• NSF I-CorpsTM National Faculty. Instructor at Berkeley and UCSF .

Page 14: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

14

Steve mentioned this…

Page 15: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

15

Do Diagnostics fit into the BMC?(or how don’t they fit?)

Page 16: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

16

REGULATION

CLINICAL TRIALS

IP

REIMBURSEMENT

Page 17: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

17

REGULATION

CLINICAL TRIALS

IP

REIMBURSEMENT

Page 18: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

18

How we will fit DX into the BMC

REGULATION

CLINICAL TRIALS

IPREIMBURSEMENT

Page 19: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

19

How we will fit DX into the BMC

REGULATION

CLINICAL TRIALS

IPREIMBURSEMENT

Page 20: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

20

TAM / SAM / SOM

• Established tests – Use the current market size• Novel tests – Use current estimated need

• Population is IMPORTANT but money (revenue) is CRITICAL– Always state your markets in dollars– Use current markets, population, etc.– OK to note market growth if it is exceptional

Page 21: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

21

The importance of timing

“Ahead of his time”

Page 22: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

22

What we wish about healthcare

Page 23: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

23

What we have in healthcare: multisided markets

Page 24: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

24

What we have in healthcare: complex processes

Page 25: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

25

What we have in healthcare: regional differences

Page 26: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

26

Multisided markets pose special challenges…

• Hypothesize about your ecosystem• Hints to solving the ecosystem puzzle: where is the test is performed?

• Think reimbursement• Know your regulators

Value Propositions: One per Customer/ecosystem Segment• Who wants it. Who doesn’t want it?• Clinical Value vs Insurance Value vs Testing Lab Value vs…

Page 27: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

Diagnostics and Value Propositions

Comes from Technical Insight Comes from Market Insight

More sensitive

More Efficient

Faster Simpler

Lower cost

Better Bundling

Better Branding

Better Distribution

New test

New user

Page 28: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

Examples of Market Insight

Masses of people are more likely to micro-blog than blog

The non-symmetric relationships will allow companies and individuals to self-promote and will impact distribution

European car sharing sensibilities could be adopted in North America

People, particularly in urban environments, no longer wanted to own cars but wanted to have flexibility.

Page 29: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

Examples of Market Insight

Need vs Want

Page 30: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

30

Why the BMC matters …

1. Value proposition2. Customer segment3. Practice of medicine4. Reimbursement5. Regulatory clearance6. Clinical testing7. OUS markets

(Sure, it does what you want, but not how you wanted it to!)

Page 31: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

31

So for next week…

• Customer segments

Which includes (for us)

Reimbursement Regulation

Hypotheses, experiments, results

Page 32: UCSF Life Sciences Week 1 diagnostics

32

For next week

CLINICAL TRIALS

IP

REIM

BURS

EME

NT

ECOSYSTEM?

REGULA

TIO

N


Recommended