+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

Date post: 06-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: tumi-mothusi
View: 231 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 21

Transcript
  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    1/21

    Unit 2.8:

    Competition policy /Regulation

    (Chapter 10 pg.322 - 332 & Smit)

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    2/21

    Define competition policy

    Legislation passed for the stated purposeof controlling monopoly power and

    preserving and promoting competition• Do you think we need competition policy? – Why or why not?

    • SA: Competition Act no. 89 of 1998 – Highly concentrated markets!

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    3/21

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    4/21

    Figure 3.1, pg. 3

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    5/21

    Arguments against monopoly

    (dominant firms)1. Allocative efficient:

    – Pareto efficiency (P =MC)

    – Perfect competition: P =MC.

    • Consumer surplusmax

    – Monopoly: P > MC

    • Reduces consumerand producer surplus

    • Deadweight loss =allocative inefficient

    – Fig. 3.2

    2. Redistribution:

    – Monopoly gainsPmPcO3O1 atexpense of consumer

    • Consumer pays higher

    prices for fewer goods

    – Unfair or sociallyunacceptabledistribution of incomeand wealth.

    – Fig. 3.2

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    6/21

    Figure 3.2, pg. 5

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    7/21

    Continue…3. Production efficiency:

    – Production efficiency:firm produces atminimum ATC.

    – Achieved underperfect competition

    • Why?

    – Monopoly maximizesprofit – not efficiency!!

    – Fig. 3.3, pg. 7

    4. Rent seeking:• Monopolies more

    profitable than perfectcompetition

    • Incentive to attempt tocreate monopoly – activity called rentseeking.

    • Options: – buy or create new

    monopoly right. – Lobbing

    – Influence political process.

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    8/21

    Fig. 3.3, pg. 7

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    9/21

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    10/21

    Fig. 10.25: Does a monopolysuppress innovation?

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    11/21

    Arguments in favour of monopolies1. Economies of scale & scope :

    – Large scales ≈ produce at the lower ATC

    – Increasing number of different goodsproduced.• Spread cost over a range of products to lower

    cost per unit.

    – Figure 3.4

    • Pm < Pc and Qm > Qc

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    12/21

    Fig. 3.4, pg. 12

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    13/21

    Continue…2. Incentive to innovate:

    – Innovation (research) is very expensive – dominantfirms can finance – Large firms are important in speeding the process of

    diffusion of technological advances.

    – Why can’t competitive firms innovate?

    3. Dominant firms can compete in internationalmarkets.

    – Small firms do not have the ability to competeagainst large international firms.

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    14/21

    Misconception of monopolies• Charge ANY PRICE = constrained by

    demand .

    • Guarantees LR and SR economic profit:demand can fall drastically

    • Always has absolute economic powerand always abuses this power: mustalways consider potential competitionand foreign companies .

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    15/21

    Regulation of natural monopolies• Natural monopoly: one firm can supply the entire output demanded

    at a lower cost than 2 or more firms can. – Occur because of economies of scale

    • Exhibit 2 & 3, pg. 284 & 285

    – Q1 = inefficient allocation of resources – Q2 = resource allocate efficiency exits – 2 options:

    • Exiting firm can increase production to Q2 = will minimize

    total cost• New firm can enter the market and produce Q3 (difference

    between Q2 and Q1) = will not minimize total cost. – Natural monopolies can charge monopoly price

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    16/21

    Fig. 10.22: Natural monopoly

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    17/21

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    18/21

    Continue…2. Profit regulation

    – Monopoly earn zero economic profit – Charge P = ATC (P2 and Q2)

    • Called average cost pricing . – Problem: no incentive to lower cost

    3. Output regulation – Mandate quantity of output that monopoly must

    produce. – Assume Q3 – where P3 > ATC – Problem:

    • Earn even higher economic profit by lowering costs• No direct competition & is protected from competitors.

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    19/21

    Fig 10.23: Cross subsidizing toincrease output

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    20/21

    Regulation (cont)3.Exclusive Contracting for a natural

    monopoly- Contract to the lowest cost firm4.Enforcment of Competition policy5.Laissez-faire policy towards natural

    monopoly – Fig. 10.24

  • 8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf

    21/21

    Fig. 10.24: Efficiency loss of a single price

    monopoly and 2 price monopoly


Recommended