Date post: | 06-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tumi-mothusi |
View: | 231 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 21
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
1/21
Unit 2.8:
Competition policy /Regulation
(Chapter 10 pg.322 - 332 & Smit)
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
2/21
Define competition policy
Legislation passed for the stated purposeof controlling monopoly power and
preserving and promoting competition• Do you think we need competition policy? – Why or why not?
• SA: Competition Act no. 89 of 1998 – Highly concentrated markets!
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
3/21
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
4/21
Figure 3.1, pg. 3
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
5/21
Arguments against monopoly
(dominant firms)1. Allocative efficient:
– Pareto efficiency (P =MC)
– Perfect competition: P =MC.
• Consumer surplusmax
– Monopoly: P > MC
• Reduces consumerand producer surplus
• Deadweight loss =allocative inefficient
– Fig. 3.2
2. Redistribution:
– Monopoly gainsPmPcO3O1 atexpense of consumer
• Consumer pays higher
prices for fewer goods
– Unfair or sociallyunacceptabledistribution of incomeand wealth.
– Fig. 3.2
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
6/21
Figure 3.2, pg. 5
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
7/21
Continue…3. Production efficiency:
– Production efficiency:firm produces atminimum ATC.
– Achieved underperfect competition
• Why?
– Monopoly maximizesprofit – not efficiency!!
– Fig. 3.3, pg. 7
4. Rent seeking:• Monopolies more
profitable than perfectcompetition
• Incentive to attempt tocreate monopoly – activity called rentseeking.
• Options: – buy or create new
monopoly right. – Lobbing
– Influence political process.
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
8/21
Fig. 3.3, pg. 7
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
9/21
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
10/21
Fig. 10.25: Does a monopolysuppress innovation?
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
11/21
Arguments in favour of monopolies1. Economies of scale & scope :
– Large scales ≈ produce at the lower ATC
– Increasing number of different goodsproduced.• Spread cost over a range of products to lower
cost per unit.
– Figure 3.4
• Pm < Pc and Qm > Qc
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
12/21
Fig. 3.4, pg. 12
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
13/21
Continue…2. Incentive to innovate:
– Innovation (research) is very expensive – dominantfirms can finance – Large firms are important in speeding the process of
diffusion of technological advances.
– Why can’t competitive firms innovate?
3. Dominant firms can compete in internationalmarkets.
– Small firms do not have the ability to competeagainst large international firms.
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
14/21
Misconception of monopolies• Charge ANY PRICE = constrained by
demand .
• Guarantees LR and SR economic profit:demand can fall drastically
• Always has absolute economic powerand always abuses this power: mustalways consider potential competitionand foreign companies .
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
15/21
Regulation of natural monopolies• Natural monopoly: one firm can supply the entire output demanded
at a lower cost than 2 or more firms can. – Occur because of economies of scale
• Exhibit 2 & 3, pg. 284 & 285
– Q1 = inefficient allocation of resources – Q2 = resource allocate efficiency exits – 2 options:
• Exiting firm can increase production to Q2 = will minimize
total cost• New firm can enter the market and produce Q3 (difference
between Q2 and Q1) = will not minimize total cost. – Natural monopolies can charge monopoly price
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
16/21
Fig. 10.22: Natural monopoly
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
17/21
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
18/21
Continue…2. Profit regulation
– Monopoly earn zero economic profit – Charge P = ATC (P2 and Q2)
• Called average cost pricing . – Problem: no incentive to lower cost
3. Output regulation – Mandate quantity of output that monopoly must
produce. – Assume Q3 – where P3 > ATC – Problem:
• Earn even higher economic profit by lowering costs• No direct competition & is protected from competitors.
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
19/21
Fig 10.23: Cross subsidizing toincrease output
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
20/21
Regulation (cont)3.Exclusive Contracting for a natural
monopoly- Contract to the lowest cost firm4.Enforcment of Competition policy5.Laissez-faire policy towards natural
monopoly – Fig. 10.24
8/17/2019 Unit 2.8 2016 students.pdf
21/21
Fig. 10.24: Efficiency loss of a single price
monopoly and 2 price monopoly