+ All Categories
Home > Documents > UPDATE: Aircraft-Derived Atmospheric Observation Data · FPAW Fall 2018 ADO Update-2 MDM 18 October...

UPDATE: Aircraft-Derived Atmospheric Observation Data · FPAW Fall 2018 ADO Update-2 MDM 18 October...

Date post: 01-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Michael McPartland FPAW Fall Meeting 18 October 2018 UPDATE: Aircraft-Derived Atmospheric Observation Data DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.
Transcript
  • Michael McPartland

    FPAW Fall Meeting

    18 October 2018

    UPDATE:Aircraft-Derived Atmospheric

    Observation Data

    DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 2MDM 18 October 2018

    This material is based upon work supported by the Federal AviationAdministration under Air Force Contract No. FA8702-15-D-0001. Anyopinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the Federal Aviation Administration.

    © 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Delivered to the U.S. Government with Unlimited Rights, as definedin DFARS Part 252.227-7013 or 7014 (Feb 2014). Notwithstanding anycopyright notice, U.S. Government rights in this work are defined byDFARS 252.227-7013 or DFARS 252.227-7014 as detailed above. Useof this work other than as specifically authorized by the U.S.Government may violate any copyrights that exist in this work.

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 3MDM 18 October 2018

    Outline

    • Review of Summer FPAW Presentation

    • Initial Comparison of MDCRS and EHS ADO Wind Estimates

    • FAA Radars and Candidate Site Modifications

    • Summary

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 4MDM 18 October 2018

    • Aircraft measurements can be used for atmospheric observations

    • Meteorological Data Collection & Reporting System (MDCRS) is current airborne source

    • Mode S Enhanced Surveillance (EHS)widely available now

    Aircraft-Derived Observations

    Air referencedvector

    Wind vector

    ADS-B = Automated Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 5MDM 18 October 2018

    Observation Source

    HorizontalCoverage

    Vertical Range

    Update Period Latency Comment

    ASOS 900 sites many at airports Surface only20 mins/

    1 min 100 kft 12 hours < 2 hrsUsed primarily for forecast input data

    MDCRSLimited fleet

    coverage (~20%current US fleet)

    Ground to typical cruise

    altitudes

    1 min ascent/ descent

    7 mins cruise

    17 minsAverage

    Range(7 60+ mins)

    Used primarily for forecast input data

    Mode S EHSGrowing fleet

    coverage (>50% current US fleet)

    Ground to typical cruise

    altitudes4.8-12 secs Seconds

    Useful for forecast & real-time operations

    ADS-B Wx Out(future)

    None now, could be meaningful %

    in future

    Ground to typical cruise

    altitudes~10 secs Seconds

    Specifications not planned until at

    least 2019

    Observation System ComparisonsAv

    aila

    ble

    Airc

    raft-

    Der

    ived

    O

    bser

    vatio

    ns

    ASOS = Airport Surface Observation SystemMDCRS = Meteorological Data Collection & Reporting System

    Mode S EHS = Mode S Enhanced Surveillance

    Aircraft-derived observations via Mode S EHS can be generated today without modifications to aircraft

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 6MDM 18 October 2018

    Current System Characterization

    • MDCRS: North American, 11 airlines reporting• E-AMDAR: Europe, 14 airlines reporting

    Ground stations

    Air data computer

    Inertial reference

    unit

    GPS

    Clock

    ACARS Meteorological Community

    Airlines

    Typical Data• Winds• Temp

    • RH%• EDR

    E-AMDAR = European Aircraft Meteorological Data RelayACARS = Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System

    RH = Relative Humidity EDR = Eddy Dissipation Rate

    ARINC

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 7MDM 18 October 2018

    Mode S EHS BasedObservation System

    Aircraft collects data from its own sources:

    GPS and on-board sensors

    Mode S EHS enables interrogation of specific aircraft

    registers to extract or derive aircraft winds and temperature

    Air referencedvector

    Wind vector

    Register Content Comment

    0x50• Ground speed• True air speed• Roll angle• Track angle

    Used to estimate• Wind speed• Wind direction• Temperature

    0x60• Mag heading• Mach• Altitude rate

    0x44 • Wind speed/dir• TemperatureAbout 5% of EHS

    A/C populate4.8 or 12 secs update rate

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 8MDM 18 October 2018

    • FAA Mode S radars do not currently interrogate relevant registers*– Could do so with reasonable adaptations

    • Lincoln MODSEF has been adapted to interrogate aircraft within range (60 nmi radius)

    Lincoln Mode S EHSAircraft-Derived Observation Evaluation

    MIT/LL Mode S Experimental Facility (MODSEF) 60 NM range

    4.8s update rate

    *FAA’s Fremont Valley BI6 radar at Edward’s AFB, whichfeeds High Desert TRACON (E10), conducts EHS interrogations

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 9MDM 18 October 2018

    Comparison of MDCRS & Mode S EHS Observations Around KBED/KBOS

    Mode S EHS9809 observations

    MDCRS120 observations

    Nov 1, 20172-3:00 PM EST

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    0

    Age at 3 PM EST(minutes)

    >80x increase in atmospheric observations with Mode S EHS vs MDCRS in this case

    43

    42Latit

    ude

    (deg

    rees

    )

    Longitude (degrees) Longitude (degrees)

    Latit

    ude

    (deg

    rees

    )

    0

    -10

    -20

    -30

    -40

    -50

    -60

    43

    42

    -72 -71 -70 -72 -71 -70

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 10MDM 18 October 2018

    Mode S EHS (n=200986)

    MDCRS (n=6465)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    Num

    ber o

    f Obs

    erva

    tions

    Mode S EHS (n=200986)

    MDCRS (n=6465)

    Comparison of MDCRS & Mode S EHS Observations Around KBED/KBOS

    Nov 1, 2017Observations across 24 hours

    Significantly increased time and altitude coverage with Mode S EHS

    (x10

    000)

    Pres

    sure

    Alti

    tude

    (kft)

    Number of Observations (✕10,000) Local Hour of Day0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 5 10 15 20

    Mode S EHS (n=200986)MDCRS (n=6465)

    Mode S EHS (n=200986)MDCRS (n=6465)

    Num

    ber o

    f Obs

    erva

    tions

    (✕10

    ,000

    )0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    00

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 11MDM 18 October 2018

    MDCRS & MODSEFObservations Around KBED/KBOS

    Magenta points in figures are RAP model grid points initialized from observation data

    Opportunity for forecast models to assimilate higher quantities of more recent data

    Mode S EHSMDCRS 0

    -10

    -20

    -30

    -40

    -50

    -60

    RAP = Rapid Refresh forecast model

    Age at 3 PM EST(minutes)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 12MDM 18 October 2018

    Observation From MODSEF &Tech Center Radars

    Snapshot ~Noon EST18 June, 2018

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 13MDM 18 October 2018

    GAMode S Only

    16%

    AirlineMode S Only

    15%

    GA EHS22%

    Airline EHS32%

    AirlineMDCRS + EHS

    14%

    Airline MDCRS Only1% All Observed Aircraft

    Observed Mode S Equipage (UPDATED)

    MDCRSToday

    EHS ADOsToday EHS ADOs

    Tomorrow?

    • Elwood, NJ radar• 1 week sampling window• Sep 24-30, 2018• 10498 unique A/C observed*

    * Observed aircraft with Mode A and Mode C transponders not included in count

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 14MDM 18 October 2018

    Outline

    • Review of Summer FPAW Presentation

    • Initial Comparison of MDCRS and EHS ADO Wind Estimates

    • FAA Radars and Candidate Site Modifications

    • Summary

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 15MDM 18 October 2018

    • Outstanding question from Summer FPAW Mtg:How do EHS ADO wind estimates compare to MDCRS’?

    • Analyzed 8 days of data of MDCRS aircraft arriving at KPHL– US registered A/C contributing to MDCRS were compared

    • Compared each MDCRS report to geographically closest EHS ADO– Compared valid reports only (specified by roll flags, etc.)– Comparisons performed if both source had estimated wind speed of

    5 knots or greater– EHS ADO were unfiltered

    • I.e., no smoothing

    MDCRS vs ADOs from EHS Data

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 16MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    Nxxxxx 2018-01-17 0625 UTC

    77° W 76

    ° W 75

    ° W 74

    ° W 73

    ° W

    38° N

    39° N

    40° N

    41° N

    Max Wind Speed = 113.3 kts

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

    MDCRS

    EHS ADO

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 17MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    Nxxxxx 2018-01-17 0625 UTC

    Max Wind Speed = 50 kts

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

    MDCRS

    EHS ADO

    Nxxxxx 2018-01-17 0625 UTC

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 18MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    EHS ADO

    Wind Speed (kt)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    MD

    CR

    S

    Win

    d Sp

    eed

    (kt)

    Speed: Nxxxxx 2018-01-17 0625

    R-squared = 1.00

    0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360

    EHS ADOWind From Direction (deg)

    0

    45

    90

    135

    180

    225

    270

    315

    360

    MD

    CR

    SW

    ind

    From

    Dire

    ctio

    n (d

    eg)

    From Direction: Nxxxxx 2018-01-17 0625

    R-squared = 0.87

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 19MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    Nyyyyy 2018-01-17 0452 UTC

    77° W 76

    ° W 75

    ° W 74

    ° W 73

    ° W

    38° N

    39° N

    40° N

    41° N

    Max Wind Speed = 133.9 kts

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

    MDCRS

    EHS ADO

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 20MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    Nyyyyy 2018-01-17 0452 UTC

    Max Wind Speed = 75 kts

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

    MDCRS

    EHS ADO

    Nyyyyy 2018-01-17 0425 UTC

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 21MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    EHS ADO

    Wind Speed (kt)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    MD

    CR

    S

    Win

    d Sp

    eed

    (kt)

    Speed: Nyyyyy 2018-01-17 0452

    R-squared = 1.00

    0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360

    EHS ADOWind From Direction (deg)

    0

    45

    90

    135

    180

    225

    270

    315

    360

    MD

    CR

    SW

    ind

    From

    Dire

    ctio

    n (d

    eg)

    From Direction: Nyyyyy 2018-01-17 0452

    R-squared = 0.98

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 22MDM 18 October 2018

    Visual ComparisonMDCRS & EHS ADO Winds

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

    EHS ADO

    Wind Speed (kt)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    MD

    CR

    S

    Win

    d Sp

    eed

    (kt)

    Speed: all PHL 2018-01-17

    R-squared = 1.00

    0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360

    EHS ADOWind From Direction (deg)

    0

    45

    90

    135

    180

    225

    270

    315

    360

    MD

    CR

    SW

    ind

    From

    Dire

    ctio

    n (d

    eg)

    Dir: all PHL 2018-01-17

    R-squared = 0.97

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    altit

    ude

    (100

    0 ft)

    24 Hr Period, 24 Unique Aircraft, Num Samples = 761

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 23MDM 18 October 2018

    • 170 Sorties• 8 full days; Jan (x3), July (x2), August (x3)• Num Samples = 5387

    • For reference– ASOS Accuracy: +/- 2 kt, +/- 3 deg– TAMDAR Accuracy: +/- 4 to 6 kt Vector RMS

    Table of Results

    RMSDifference

    2.8 (2.6) 2.0 (1.9) 5.6 (5.5)

    MDCRS to EHS ADOsVector (kt) Speed (kt) Direction (deg)

    Wind Estimate Comparisons

    ( ) = Standard Deviation

    Sheet1

    Local Hour24-Sep25-Sep26-Sep27-Sep28-Sep29-Sep30-Sep

    00330143

    11197970

    2224636465734

    3225663564857

    40156223

    52133323

    64153444

    760122214177

    81111615151013

    91011412121412

    101021815151312

    114214127128

    121144431

    1360461063

    141922025343015

    153304138292918

    16162133346

    177432332

    180131531

    191322120

    200111314

    21603332323531

    22144643425338

    23012326302121

    Number of NOAA Reported MDCRS flights in/out of KMEM (local time)

    24-Sep01220246111010416193316701061025-Sep31221110112210202413104126-Sep394656535121614181444204113332133462327-Sep07366363322151215124625383212132432628-Sep19465623414151215741034293351332423029-Sep47574822417101413123630294332135532130-Sep3034573347131212813151862104313821Local Hour01234567891011121314151617181920212223

    Sheet2

    Wind Estimate Comparisons

    MDCRS to EHS ADOs

    Vector (kt)Speed (kt)Direction (deg)

    RMSDifference2.8(2.6)2.0(1.9)5.6(5.5)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 24MDM 18 October 2018

    Outline

    • Review of Summer FPAW Presentation

    • Initial Comparison of MDCRS and EHS ADO Wind Estimates

    • FAA Radars and Candidate Site Modifications

    • Summary

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 25MDM 18 October 2018

    Existing Secondary Surveillance Radars

    TypeMonted on

    Primary RadarSecondary Radar Only

    Simplest EHS Adaptation

    MSSR 65 0 0 -BI-5 48 1 0 -

    MODE S 133 4 1 Sidecar PCBI-6 101 32 1 Config file edit

    CountsCan Interrogate

    Mode S Registers

    FAA Beacon Interrogators

    Typically 60 nmirange ASR

    Typically 240 nmi range ARSR

    MIT/LLMODSEF

    Tech Centerradar

    Sheet1

    FAA Beacon Interrogators

    Counts

    TypeMonted on Primary RadarSecondary Radar OnlyCan Interrogate Mode S RegistersSimplest EHS Adaptation

    MSSR6500-

    BI-54810-

    MODE S13341Sidecar PC

    BI-6101321Config file edit

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 26MDM 18 October 2018

    Lower 48 & Caribbean BI-6 Radars

    = 240 nmi radius, w/ primary = 60 nmi radius, SSR only = 240 nmi radius, SSR only

    BI-6 Secondary Surveillance Radars (N = 122)

    120 ° W 110 ° W

    100° W 90

    ° W 80

    ° W 70

    ° W

    60° W

    20 ° N

    30 ° N

    40 ° N

    50 ° N

    BI-6 Secondary Surveillance Radars(N= 122)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 27MDM 18 October 2018

    Changes to BI-6 to Enable EHS

    • From Tech Center BI-6 radar Config file– These lines were added:

    • Outstanding question: Are there ready means to move interrogated data off-site?

    ; *** Enhanced Surveillance ***PS309OFF ; Disable Surv. Only Mode (i.e. Enhanced Surveillance Enabled)IAL 0 = G 40 3 4IAL 1 = G 50 1 5IAL 2 = G 60 1 5

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 28MDM 18 October 2018

    • EHS ADO & MDCRS Wind Estimates are very similar

    • Leveraging aircraft-derived operations holds significant promise for improving weather forecasting and real-time operations

    • Mode S EHS is a currently-available technology enabling immediate access to aircraft-derived observations

    Summary

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 29MDM 18 October 2018

    Backup

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 30MDM 18 October 2018

    Lower 48 Mode S Beacon Interrogators

    = 240 nmi radius, w/ primary = 60 nmi radius, w/ primary = Unknown range, SSR only

    120 ° W 110 ° W 100

    ° W 90

    ° W 80

    ° W 70

    ° W

    20 ° N

    30 ° N

    40 ° N

    50 ° N

    Mode S Secondary Surveillance Radars(N= 138)

  • FPAW Fall 2018ADO Update- 31MDM 18 October 2018

    Fremont Valley, CA, Elwood, NJ, Lexington, MA Mode S EHS Radars

    Snapshot 3PM EST18 June, 2018

    UPDATE:�Aircraft-Derived Atmospheric �Observation DataSlide Number 2OutlineAircraft-Derived Observations Observation System ComparisonsCurrent System CharacterizationMode S EHS Based�Observation SystemLincoln Mode S EHS�Aircraft-Derived Observation EvaluationComparison of MDCRS & Mode S EHS Observations Around KBED/KBOSComparison of MDCRS & Mode S EHS Observations Around KBED/KBOSMDCRS & MODSEF�Observations Around KBED/KBOSObservation From MODSEF &�Tech Center RadarsObserved Mode S Equipage (UPDATED)OutlineMDCRS vs ADOs from EHS DataVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsVisual Comparison�MDCRS & EHS ADO WindsTable of ResultsOutlineExisting Secondary Surveillance RadarsLower 48 & Caribbean BI-6 RadarsChanges to BI-6 to Enable EHSSummaryBackupLower 48 Mode S Beacon InterrogatorsFremont Valley, CA, Elwood, NJ, Lexington, MA Mode S EHS Radars


Recommended