+ All Categories
Home > Documents > USGS - Hydrogeologic Framework and …wa.water.usgs.gov › projects › chehalis ›...

USGS - Hydrogeologic Framework and …wa.water.usgs.gov › projects › chehalis ›...

Date post: 07-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydrogeologic Framework and Groundwater/Surface-Water Interactions of the Chehalis River Basin, Washington Andrew S. Gendaszek, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, Washington Introduction The Chehalis River has the largest drainage basin (fig. 1) of any river entirely contained within the state of Washington with a watershed of about 2,700 mi 2 and has diverse geology, land uses, and demands for water resources. Local citizens and governments of the Chehalis River basin have coordinated with Federal, state and tribal agencies through the Chehalis Basin Partnership to develop a long-term watershed management plan. The recognition of the interdependence of groundwater and surface-water resources of the Chehalis River basin and their complex interaction became the impetus for this study, the purpose of which is to describe the hydrogeologic framework and groundwater-surface water interactions of the basin. The basin-wide hydrogeologic framework was generalized by combining surficial geologic maps with more than 372 drillers’ lithostratigraphic logs. The framework consists of five hydrogeologic units that include aquifers within unconsolidated glacial and alluvial sediments separated by discontinuous confining units. These five units are bounded by a basal confining unit comprised of Tertiary bedrock. Generalized groundwater flow directions in the surficial aquifers were delineated from water-levels measured in wells between August and September 2009. Synoptic streamflows during August 2010 and water levels in wells during the 2010 water year were measured to characterize groundwater-surface water interactions in the Chehalis River basin. The streamflow mesurements revealed alternating gains and losses of streamflow, which became more pronounced on the Chehalis River downstream of its confluence with the Black River. Groundwater levels measured in wells fluctuated with changes in streamflow. These fluctuations were influenced by precipitation events in the upper Chehalis River basin and tidal effects from of the Pacific Ocean in the lower Chehalis River basin. GRAYS HARBOR GRAYS HARBOR PACIFIC KITSAP JEFFERSON MASON PIERCE THURSTON WAHKIAKUM LEWIS COWLITZ Cowlitz River Basin Deschutes River Basin KING Montesano Pe Ell Doty Hoquiam Aberdeen Chehalis Porter Centralia Grand Rochester Mound Bucoda Tenino W y n o o c h e e R ive r S at s o p R i v e r M i d d l e F or k W e s t F o r k E as t F o r k W i s h k a h R i v e r H u m p t u l i p s R i v e r W e st F o rk E as t F o r k B i g C r H o q u i a m R i v e r , E a s t F o r k W e s t F o r k S k o o k u m ch u c k R i v e r Ne w a u k u m R i v e r , N o rt h F o r k N e w a u k u m R i v e r , S o u t h Fo r k C l o q u a l l um C r C h eh a l i s R i v e r S o u t h F o r k C h e h a l i s R i v e r C he h a l i s R i v e r PACIFIC OCEAN Grays Harbor Willapa Bay 47° 30' 47° 46° 30' 123°30' 124° 122°30' 123° 0 20 MILES 5 10 15 0 10 20 KILOMETERS 5 15 Scat ter C r ee k B la c k Ri ve r C he ha lis River Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data, 1:100,000, 1985 Universal Transverse Mercator projection, Zone 10 North American Datum of 1983 Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation Olympic Mountains WASHINGTON Location of figure 4. Location of figure 5. Figure 1. Location of the Chehalis River basin, Washington. Groundwater/Surface-Water Interactions Surface-water bodies such as rivers and lakes can readily interact with groundwater and exchange appreciable quantities of water and solutes. This exchange, or seepage, provides both recharge of aquifers and maintenance of streamflows and has the potential to affect water quality of groundwater and surface water bodies. When the groundwater level in the underlying aquifer is higher than the river stage, an upward hydraulic gradient drives the movement of water from the groundwater to the river resulting in a gaining river. Conversely, a downward hydraulic gradient exists when the river elevation is higher than the groundwater level causing the river to lose water to the underlying aquifer. Well Monitoring Water levels in wells completed in the aquifers within several kilometers of the Chehalis River (fig. 2) fluctuated with the changes in river stage that were driven by precipitation events in the upper Chehalis River and tides within the lower Chehalis River. Wells completed in close proximity to the Chehalis River and its tributaries, notably well 14N/02W-07B02 (fig. 2A), fluctuated directly with river stage as measured at streamflow-gaging stations. The minimal delay in the peak of the well 14N/02W-07B02 hydrograph from the streamflow-gaging station in response to precipitation events was caused largely by the high hydrologic conductivities of the overlying sediments and lack of confining layers. The well 15N/04W-03R02 (fig. 2B) fluctuated with the streamflow hydrograph, but the amplitude of the fluctuations is lower because it is farther away from the Chehalis River and other streams. The stage of the Chehalis River is influenced by ocean tides downstream of the confluence of the Chehalis River with the Satsop River. Water levels of well 17N/07W- 08K02 (fig. 3) which is completed in the unit A (fig. 4) fluctuate closely with the stage measured at a nearby USGS streamflow-gaging station (12035100). These well hydrograph fluctuations are attenuated approximately 75 percent from stream hydrograph fluctuations. Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 149.0 151.0 153.0 155.0 157.0 159.0 161.0 163.0 PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES STREAM STAGE, IN FEET GROUNDWATER ELEVATION, IN FEET ABOVE NAVD88 A Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 80.0 83.0 86.0 89.0 92.0 95.0 98.0 101.0 PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES STREAM STAGE, IN FEET GROUNDWATER ELEVATION, IN FEET ABOVE NAVD88 B Well Stage Stream Stage Monthly Precipitation Well Stage Stream Stage Monthly Precipitation precipitation at Centralia, September 2009 September 2010 for wells 14N/02W-07B02 (A) and 15N/04W-03R02 (B). Figure 2. Continuous water levels in wells, stream stage at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gaging station 120227500, Chehalis River at Grand Mound, and total monthly 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AND STREAM STAGE, IN FEET ABOVE NAVD88 Well Stage Stream Stage APRIL 2010 Figure 3. Water levels in well 17N/07W-08K02 and stream stage at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 12035100, Chehalis River at Montesano, April 1 – April 11, 2010. Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1:100,000 Universal Transverse Mercator Projection Geology compiled from Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources (2005). 17N/07W-08K02 15N/04W-03R02 14N/02W-07B02 123°0'W 123°30'W 47°0'N SCALE 1:250,000 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 MILES 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 KILOMETERS A A’ B’ B 12035100 12027500 25 50 125 100 175 150 75 225 300 525 275 200 250 500 325 425 400 375 350 25 275 125 50 150 325 50 250 175 50 200 75 225 200 175 100 150 150 50 200 100 300 125 NAVD88 200 400 600 NAVD88 200 400 600 15N/03W-07J01 15N/03W-10D02P1 CHEHALIS RIVER 15N/03W-03A2P1 16N/03W-36J01 16N/02W-29L02P1 16N/02W-29G04 16N/02W-09N01 16N/02W-09F01 17N/02W-33K02 17N/02W-28J06 17N/02W-22F03 SECTION B-B’ SECTION BEND IN SCALE 1: 62,500 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION x20 A A’ ? ? ? 500 ! ! ! ! Explanation A B C D E BEDROCK BOUNDARY OF CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN TRACE OF HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION INVENTORIED WELL AND NO. UNIT AUG-SEPT 2009 WATER TABLE, IN FEET ABOVE NAVD88 USGS STREAMFLOW GAGING STATION Figure 4. Map and cross sections showing hydrogeologic units within Chehalis River basin, Washington. 1.6 6.5 4 5.4 0.6 0 -6.5 3.2 -2 6.9 7 4.7 -3.8 -0.6 13.1 9.6 17.8 6.7 1.5 1.8 -1.2 -41.9 -11.3 -4.6 0 13.1 46° 45" Explanation Seepage measurement Seepage reaches Gain/loss (ft 3 /s/mi) Loss: -41.9 - 0 0 Gain: 0 - 34.9 Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data, 1:100,000 Universal Transverse Mercator projection, Zone 10 North american Datum of 1983 0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES 0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS Black River Skookumchuck River Chehalis River Scatter Creek 34.9 Figure 5. Streamflow gains and losses, August 2010. August 2010 Seepage Run A series of streamflow measurements to identify gaining and losing reaches, termed a seepage run, were made during summer base flow conditions in August 2010 when streamflow was at its lowest, and the relative contribution of groundwater was at its annual maximum, and the contribution of precipitation was minimal. Synoptic discharge measurements were made at 41 locations and streamflow gains and losses were calculated for 28 reaches from August 17 to 19, 2010 (fig. 5). The seepage run reveals a pattern of alternating gains and losses of streamflow throughout the extent of the river system. Of the 28 reaches, 17 (61 percent) gained streamflow, 9 (32 percent) lost streamflow and 2 (7 percent) had no net gain or loss of streamflow (fig. 5). Gains and losses of streamflow were minimal upstream of the confluence of the Chehalis and Black Rivers, but became more dynamic downstream with gains and losses as much as 34.9 ft 3 /s/mi and -41.9 ft 3 /s/mi, respectively. Most streamflow gains and losses were small relative to the compounded error in streamflow measurements demonstrating the difficulty in measuring streamflow gains and losses. Ungaged diversions and return flows between streamflow measurements may cause an overestimation or underestimation of loses or gains, respectively. Hydrogeologic Units Five hydrogeologic units and bedrock were differentiated based on their lithologic and hydraulic characteristics (fig. 4). Unit A - Alluvium and Vashon Recessional Outwash (Aquifer) – The Unit A aquifer extends throughout the major river valleys and lowland prairies of the Chehalis River and its tributaries and comprises the most areally extensive surficial aquifer. This aquifer interacts readily with surficial water features sustaining summer streamflows and recharging during winter. This unit contains alluvial sediments of glacial and non-glacial origins with silt, sand, gravel, and coarse materials. Significant heterogeneity exists within this aquifer including the presence of local confining layers. Unit B - Vashon Till and Morainal Deposits (Confining Unit) – The B confining unit is distributed in the northern part of the Chehalis River basin and is comprised of unsorted and unstratified deposits with clay to boulder- sized particles although irregularly distributed layers of sand and gravel containing small amounts of groundwater occur locally. This unit was deposited during the last glacial advance at the southern margin of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet. Unit C - Vashon Advance Outwash (Aquifer) – Advance glacial outwash of Vashon age and pre-Vashon age outwash in hydrologic connection with each other form the C aquifer where they are confined by the B confining unit in the northern part of the Chehalis River basin. Unit D - Quaternary Alpine Glacial Outwash (Aquifer) – Alpine glacial outwash emanating from the Cascade and Olympic Mountains comprises the Unit D aquifer on the bedrock uplands of the Chehalis River basin. Several episodes of alpine glaciation have been documented since the early Pleistocene and their deposits consist of Cascade and Olympic-derived Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The top parts of these deposits have been extensively weathered into clay confining groundwater where this unit is saturated. Unit E - Pre-Vashon Glacial Drift (Aquifers and Confining Units) – The E unit is comprised of Pre-Vashon tills and outwash sequences deposited in the northern Chehalis River basin as far south as Centralia. Groundwater within the E unit occurs under confined conditions within the coarse grained outwash sequences. The outwash is separated from stratigraphically higher A and C aquifers by till layers. Multiple aquifers and confining units within the E unit may exist where they have not been eroded. Bedrock – The Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic bedrock forms the basal confining unit of the groundwater-flow system and is relatively impermeable in relation to the unconsolidated sediments stratigraphically above it. Bedrock locally yields water sufficient for domestic use through fracture flow. References Cited Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, 2005, Digital 1:100,000- scale geology of Washington State, version 1.0: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open-File Report 2005-3, accessed January 5, 2011, at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/Topics/GeosciencesData/Pages/gis_data. asp. For More Information: Andrew S. Gendaszek - [email protected] U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center 934 Broadway Suite 300, Tacoma, Washington 98402 http://wa.water.usgs.gov/ NAVD88 200 400 600 SCALE 1: 62,500 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION x20 B B’ NAVD88 200 400 600 SECTION SECTION BEND IN A-A’ 16N/03W-29L03P1 15N/03W-03A2P1 15N/03W-02R01P1 14N/02W-06C02 14N/02W-39R01 14N/02W-07B02 15N/03W-14E01 15N/03W-25L08 14N/02W-31P01 14N/02W-31C01 14N/02W-19H06 14N/02W-17N01 13N/02W-07Q02 13N/02W-06K01 15N/03W-24L01 16N/03W-33F05 ? CHEHALIS RIVER CHEHALIS RIVER BLACK RIVER CHEHALIS RIVER
Transcript
Page 1: USGS - Hydrogeologic Framework and …wa.water.usgs.gov › projects › chehalis › watac11-0615.pdfpurpose of which is to describe the hydrogeologic framework and groundwater-surface

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological Survey

Hydrogeologic Framework and Groundwater/Surface-Water Interactions of the Chehalis River Basin, Washington Andrew S. Gendaszek, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, Washington

IntroductionThe Chehalis River has the largest drainage basin (fig. 1) of any river entirely contained within the state of Washington with a watershed of about 2,700 mi2 and has diverse geology, land uses, and demands for water resources. Local citizens and governments of the Chehalis River basin have coordinated with Federal, state and tribal agencies through the Chehalis Basin Partnership to develop a long-term watershed management plan. The recognition of the interdependence of groundwater and surface-water resources of the Chehalis River basin and their complex interaction became the impetus for this study, the purpose of which is to describe the hydrogeologic framework and groundwater-surface water interactions of the basin. The basin-wide hydrogeologic framework was generalized by combining surficial geologic maps with more than 372 drillers’ lithostratigraphic logs. The framework consists of five hydrogeologic units that include aquifers within unconsolidated glacial

and alluvial sediments separated by discontinuous confining units. These five units are bounded by a basal confining unit comprised of Tertiary bedrock. Generalized groundwater flow directions in the surficial aquifers were delineated from water-levels measured in wells between August and September 2009. Synoptic streamflows during August 2010 and water levels in wells during the 2010 water year were measured to characterize groundwater-surface water interactions in the Chehalis River basin. The streamflow mesurements revealed alternating gains and losses of streamflow, which became more pronounced on the Chehalis River downstream of its confluence with the Black River. Groundwater levels measured in wells fluctuated with changes in streamflow. These fluctuations were influenced by precipitation events in the upper Chehalis River basin and tidal effects from of the Pacific Ocean in the lower Chehalis River basin.

GRAYS HARBOR

GRAYS HARBOR

PACIFIC

KITSAP

JEFFERSON

MASON

PIERCE

THURSTON

WAHKIAKUM

LEWIS

COWLITZ

Cowlitz River Basin

Deschutes River Basin

KING

Montesano

Pe Ell

Doty

Hoquiam

Aberdeen

Chehalis

Porter

Centralia

Grand

Rochester

MoundBucoda

Tenino

Wyn

ooch

ee

R i

ver

Sats

op

Riv

er

M

iddl

e F

ork

Wes

t

Fo

rk

E ast

Fork

Wis

hk

ah

Riv

er

Hum

ptuli

ps

Riv

er

Wes

t

Fork

East

For

k

BigCr

Hoq

uiam R

iver

, East

For

k

Wes

t F

ork

Sk

ooku

mchuck River

Newaukum Riv

er,

North Fork

Newaukum R

iver,

South Fork

Cloq

uallu

m C

r

Chehalis River

South

For

k C

heha

lis

R i

ver

Che

halis

Riv

er

PAC

IFIC

OC

EAN

GraysHarbor

WillapaBay

47° 30'

47°

46° 30'

123°30' 124° 122°30' 123°

0 20 MILES 5 10 15

0 10 20 KILOMETERS 5 15

Scatter Creek

Bla

ck

Rive

r

Chehalis River

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data, 1:100,000, 1985Universal Transverse Mercator projection, Zone 10North American Datum of 1983

ConfederatedTribes of theChehalisReservation

Olympic Mountains

WASHINGTON

Location of �gure 4.

Location of �gure 5.

Figure 1. Location of the Chehalis River basin, Washington.

Groundwater/Surface-Water Interactions Surface-water bodies such as rivers and lakes can readily interact with groundwater and exchange appreciable quantities of water and solutes. This exchange, or seepage, provides both recharge of aquifers and maintenance of streamflows and has the potential to affect water quality of groundwater and surface water bodies. When the groundwater level in the underlying aquifer is higher

than the river stage, an upward hydraulic gradient drives the movement of water from the groundwater to the river resulting in a gaining river. Conversely, a downward hydraulic gradient exists when the river elevation is higher than the groundwater level causing the river to lose water to the underlying aquifer.

Well MonitoringWater levels in wells completed in the aquifers within several kilometers of the Chehalis River (fig. 2) fluctuated with the changes in river stage that were driven by precipitation events in the upper Chehalis River and tides within the lower Chehalis River. Wells completed in close proximity to the Chehalis River and its tributaries, notably well 14N/02W-07B02 (fig. 2A), fluctuated directly with river stage as measured at streamflow-gaging stations. The minimal delay in the peak of the well 14N/02W-07B02 hydrograph from the streamflow-gaging station in response to precipitation events was caused largely by the high hydrologic conductivities of the overlying sediments and lack of confining

layers. The well 15N/04W-03R02 (fig. 2B) fluctuated with the streamflow hydrograph, but the amplitude of the fluctuations is lower because it is farther away from the Chehalis River and other streams. The stage of the Chehalis River is influenced by ocean tides downstream of the confluence of the Chehalis River with the Satsop River. Water levels of well 17N/07W-08K02 (fig. 3) which is completed in the unit A (fig. 4) fluctuate closely with the stage measured at a nearby USGS streamflow-gaging station (12035100). These well hydrograph fluctuations are attenuated approximately 75 percent from stream hydrograph fluctuations.

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

149.0

151.0

153.0

155.0

157.0

159.0

161.0

163.0

PREC

IPIT

ATIO

N, I

N IN

CHES

STRE

AM S

TAGE

, IN

FEE

T

GRO

UN

DWAT

ER E

LEVA

TIO

N,

IN F

EET

ABO

VE N

AVD8

8

A

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

80.0

83.0

86.0

89.0

92.0

95.0

98.0

101.0

PREC

IPIT

ATIO

N, I

N IN

CHES

STRE

AM S

TAGE

, IN

FEE

T

GRO

UN

DWAT

ER E

LEVA

TIO

N,

IN F

EET

ABO

VE N

AVD8

8

BWell Stage

Stream Stage

Monthly Precipitation

Well Stage

Stream Stage

Monthly Precipitation

precipitation at Centralia, September 2009 – September 2010 for wells 14N/02W-07B02 (A) and 15N/04W-03R02 (B).Figure 2. Continuous water levels in wells, stream stage at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow gaging station 120227500, Chehalis River at Grand Mound, and total monthly

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2 4 6 8 10

GRO

UN

DWAT

ER E

LEVA

TIO

N A

ND

STRE

AMST

AGE,

IN F

EET

ABO

VE N

AVD8

8 Well Stage

Stream Stage

APRIL 2010

Figure 3. Water levels in well 17N/07W-08K02 and stream stage at U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging station 12035100, Chehalis River at Montesano, April 1 – April 11, 2010.

Base from U.S. Geological Survey digital data, 1:100,000Universal Transverse Mercator ProjectionGeology compiled from Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources (2005).

17N/07W-08K02

15N/04W-03R02

14N/02W-07B02

123°0'W123°30'W

47°0'N

SCALE 1:250,0000 2 4 6 8 101 MILES

0 2 4 6 8 101 KILOMETERS

A

A’

B’

B

12035100

12027500

25

50

125

100

175

150

75

225

300 52527

520

0

250

500

325

425400

375

350

25

275

125

50

150

325

50

25017

5

50200

7522520

0

175

100

150

15050

200

100 300

125

NAVD88

200

400

600

NAVD88

200

400

600

15N

/03W

-07J

01

15N

/03W

-10D

02P1

CHEH

ALI

S RI

VER

15N

/03W

-03A

2P1

16N

/03W

-36J

01

16N

/02W

-29L

02P1

16N

/02W

-29G

04

16N

/02W

-09N

01

16N

/02W

-09F

01

17N

/02W

-33K

02

17N

/02W

-28J

06

17N

/02W

-22F

03

SEC

TIO

NB-

B’

SEC

TIO

NBE

ND

IN

SCALE 1: 62,500 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION x20

A A’

??

?

500

!

!

!

!!

Explanation

A

B

C

D

E

BEDROCK!

BOUNDARY OF CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN

TRACE OF HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION

INVENTORIED WELL AND NO.

UNIT

AUG-SEPT 2009 WATER TABLE, IN FEET ABOVE NAVD88USGS STREAMFLOW GAGING STATION

Figure 4. Map and cross sections showing hydrogeologic units within Chehalis River basin, Washington.

1.6

6.54 5.4

0.6

0

-6.5

3.2

-2

6.9

74.7

-3.8

-0.6

13.1

9.6

17.8

6.7

1.51.8

-1.2-41.9

-11.

3

-4.6

0

13.1

123°0'123°15'

46°45"

ExplanationSeepage measurement

Seepage reachesGain/loss (ft3/s/mi)

Loss: -41.9 - 0

0

Gain: 0 - 34.9

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data, 1:100,000Universal Transverse Mercator projection,Zone 10 North american Datum of 1983

0 1 2 3 4 5 MILES

0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS

Black River

SkookumchuckRiver

Chehalis River

Scatter Creek34.9

Figure 5. Streamflow gains and losses, August 2010.

August 2010 Seepage RunA series of streamflow measurements to identify gaining and losing reaches, termed a seepage run, were made during summer base flow conditions in August 2010 when streamflow was at its lowest, and the relative contribution of groundwater was at its annual maximum, and the contribution of precipitation was minimal. Synoptic discharge measurements were made at 41 locations and streamflow gains and losses were calculated for 28 reaches from August 17 to 19, 2010 (fig. 5). The seepage run reveals a pattern of alternating gains and losses of streamflow throughout the extent of the river system. Of the 28 reaches, 17 (61 percent) gained streamflow, 9 (32 percent) lost streamflow and 2 (7 percent) had no net gain or loss of streamflow (fig. 5). Gains and losses of streamflow were minimal upstream of the confluence of the Chehalis and Black Rivers, but became more dynamic downstream with gains and losses as much as 34.9 ft3/s/mi and -41.9 ft3/s/mi, respectively. Most streamflow gains and losses were small relative to the compounded error in streamflow measurements demonstrating the difficulty in measuring streamflow gains and losses. Ungaged diversions and return flows between streamflow measurements may cause an overestimation or underestimation of loses or gains, respectively.

Hydrogeologic UnitsFive hydrogeologic units and bedrock were differentiated based on their lithologic and hydraulic characteristics (fig. 4).

Unit A - Alluvium and Vashon Recessional Outwash (Aquifer) – The Unit A aquifer extends throughout the major river valleys and lowland prairies of the Chehalis River and its tributaries and comprises the most areally extensive surficial aquifer. This aquifer interacts readily with surficial water features sustaining summer streamflows and recharging during winter. This unit contains alluvial sediments of glacial and non-glacial origins with silt, sand, gravel, and coarse materials. Significant heterogeneity exists within this aquifer including the presence of local confining layers.

Unit B - Vashon Till and Morainal Deposits (Confining Unit) – The B confining unit is distributed in the northern part of the Chehalis River basin and is comprised of unsorted and unstratified deposits with clay to boulder-sized particles although irregularly distributed layers of sand and gravel containing small amounts of groundwater occur locally. This unit was deposited during the last glacial advance at the southern margin of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet.

Unit C - Vashon Advance Outwash (Aquifer) – Advance glacial outwash of Vashon age and pre-Vashon age outwash in hydrologic connection with each other form the C aquifer where they are confined by the B confining unit in the northern part of the Chehalis River basin.

Unit D - Quaternary Alpine Glacial Outwash (Aquifer) – Alpine glacial outwash emanating from the Cascade and Olympic Mountains comprises the Unit D aquifer on the bedrock uplands of the Chehalis River basin. Several episodes of alpine glaciation have been documented since the early Pleistocene and their deposits consist of Cascade and Olympic-derived Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rocks. The top parts of these deposits have been extensively weathered into clay confining groundwater where this unit is saturated.

Unit E - Pre-Vashon Glacial Drift (Aquifers and Confining Units) – The E unit is comprised of Pre-Vashon tills and outwash sequences deposited in the northern Chehalis River basin as far south as Centralia. Groundwater within the E unit occurs under confined conditions within the coarse grained outwash sequences. The outwash is separated from stratigraphically higher A and C aquifers by till layers. Multiple aquifers and confining units within the E unit may exist where they have not been eroded.

Bedrock – The Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic bedrock forms the basal confining unit of the groundwater-flow system and is relatively impermeable in relation to the unconsolidated sediments stratigraphically above it. Bedrock locally yields water sufficient for domestic use through fracture flow.

References CitedWashington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, 2005, Digital 1:100,000-

scale geology of Washington State, version 1.0: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open-File Report 2005-3, accessed January 5, 2011, at http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ResearchScience/Topics/GeosciencesData/Pages/gis_data.asp.

For More Information:Andrew S. Gendaszek - [email protected]. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center934 Broadway Suite 300, Tacoma, Washington 98402http://wa.water.usgs.gov/

NAVD88

200

400

600

SCALE 1: 62,500 VERTICAL EXAGGERATION x20

B B’

NAVD88

200

400

600 SEC

TIO

N

SEC

TIO

NBE

ND

IN

A-A

16N

/03W

-29L

03P1

15N

/03W

-03A

2P1

15N

/03W

-02R

01P1

14N

/02W

-06C

02

14N

/02W

-39R

0114

N/0

2W-0

7B02

15N

/03W

-14E

01

15N

/03W

-25L

08

14N

/02W

-31P

01

14N

/02W

-31C

01

14N

/02W

-19H

06

14N

/02W

-17N

01

13N

/02W

-07Q

02

13N

/02W

-06K

01

15N

/03W

-24L

01

16N

/03W

-33F

05

?

CHEH

ALI

S RI

VER

CHEH

ALI

S RI

VER

BLAC

K RI

VER

CHEH

ALI

S RI

VER

Recommended