Using NASA Life Support Technology to Reduce Cement Industry CO2 Emissions and Explore Improvements to Concrete Durability
PI: Dr. Morgan B. AbneyEnvironmental Control and Life Support SystemsNASA Marshall Space Flight Center
September 2016 ACI Strategic Development Council #40
September 8, 2016
1
Collaborators:
Dr. Tanya KomasConcrete Preservation Institute
Dr. Jim AllemanCivil, Construction, and
Environmental EngineeringIowa State University
Agenda
• Introduction
• Background of NASA Technology
• Technology Transfer to Cement/Concrete Industry
• Progress To-Date
• Conclusions
• Future Work
2
Introduction
• Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS)
• Long Duration Missions
– Lunar or Mars Surface
– Mars Transit
• Atmosphere Revitalization Resource Recovery
– CO2 O2 + C(s)
– Oxygen Recycling
– Carbon repurposing
3
Goal = keep astronautshealthy & happy @ space
Background of NASA Technology
• Bosch Process
4
O2 CO2 Reactor 1
H2O
Reactor 2
Carbon
Separation
Series-Bosch SystemCrew Members
breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2
CO2 is combined with H2 and fed to the
Series-Bosch System
H2O produced in Reactor 1 can be used for drinking and washing or
electrolyzed to produce O2Carbon product from Reactor 2 might be used to make filters, to make carbon ropes, or as a
filler for radiation shielding materials.
Background of NASA Technology
• Chemistry
• Challenges for Space Application
– Power Consumption
– Catalyst Resupply
– Volume/Mass
5
RWGS
Carbon Formation
CO2 + H2 H2O + CO
2CO CO2 + C(s)
CO + H2 H2O + C(s)
CO2 + 2H2 2H2O + C(s)
1980’s Bosch System
Technology Transfer
• 2010 Iowa State University approached NASA about using Bosch technology to reduce CO2 emissions in the cement industry
6
O2 CO2 Reactor 1
H2O
Reactor 2
Carbon
Separation
Series-Bosch SystemCement factories
produce the 5th most CO2 of any industry in
the world
CO2 is heated using energy already
produced by the system
Metal content of clinker or cement product is reactive for the desired
reactions, steam is exhausted to the air Carbon product from Reactor 2 is intrinsic to the clinker material
Technology Transfer
7
SEM of Carbon fibers (platleted) from Space Bosch Testing
• Carbon is produced at the iron nuclei in the cement/clinker
• Carbon fibers produced
Progress To-Date
• Confirmed catalytic properties of clinker and cement produced both domestically and internationally (various suppliers)
• Carbon formed at Fe nuclei in the clinker/cement material– Not mixed in – inherently part of the starting material
8
Carbon formation on clinker in increasing time increments (t= 0hrs, 4 hrs, 8 hrs).
Progress To-Date
• Evaluated carbon produced– Nano- and Micro-fibers – Highly dispersed at the macro level– Pockets of carbon at the micro level– Grinding of carbon provided thorough dispersion
• No damage to the carbon fibers
9Unground Carbonaceous Cement (CC) Ground CC
Progress To-Date
• Concrete test bricks
–Cement (directly from manufacturer) used in the Bosch process (T>450°C) to form CC
–CC used to produce concrete test samples
• Water/Cement Ratio of 0.5
• Observation during preparation of test bricks
– Bricks tested for:• Compressive strength
• Tensile strength
• Modulus of elasticity
• SIMCO Stadium Analysis Porosity
• SIMCO Stadium Analysis Migration
10
Cement
CC
vs
Large difference in workability
Non-ideal conditions to compare two cements
Progress To-Date
11
Based on Yazdani et al. this is the expected result for w/c of 0.5. Lower ratios would be expected to provide improved compressive strength for CC over the untreated cement.
Progress To-Date
• SIMCO Stadium® Initial Results: After seven days of curing, mortar cylinders were removed from the moist room and sampled:– ASTM C642 – Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, & Voids in
Hardened Concrete• 4 x Untreated Cement Porosity Measurements
• 2 x CC Porosity Measurements
– Migration Tests conducted in setup shown• 8 x Untreated Cement Migration
Tests
• 4 x CC Migration Tests
12
Migration test setup
Progress To-Date
• Slightly higher porosity value observed for CC is probably due to testing error (per SIMCO)
13
10.74%
11.33%
7 days of hydration
Mix.1 Mix.2
21.41%
22.78%
7 days of hydration
Mix.1 Mix.2
(SD 0.35%) (SD 0.22%)
Volume of permeable pore spaces (%) Absorption (%)
Cement CementCC CC
Progress To-Date
14
Cement (top)
Cement (bottom)Cement
CC
• CC mixture current values are slightly lower than untreated Cement, implying a better diffusivity property
Logistic and Economic Feasibility
• Logistic Feasibility– Approach uses existing technology (rotary kiln,
grinder, water condensers, etc.)
– Does not interfere with current cement production
– Simple integration into existing cement plants
• Economic Feasibility– Energy for system – minimized by using excess heat
from cement production
– H2 Supply – Cost currently prohibitive at $9/kg –break-even around $5/kg• Unless alternative energy can be used to electrolyze product
water
15
Conclusions
• Lower w/c ratios should show improved compressive strength for CC over untreated cement
• The presence of carbon in the cement results in decreased permeability of ions – possible increase in concrete durability
16
Future Work
• Optimization of carbon content in cement
• Optimization of w/c ratio for concrete product
• Evaluation of effect of w/c ratio on ion permeability
• Scaled production of CC– Benchtop
– Pilot Scale
• Negotiations/teaming with H2 suppliers or alternative energy companies
17
Questions?
18
Contact Information
Morgan B. Abney, Ph.D.National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMarshall Space Flight CenterBldg 4755, Room 407MSFC, AL 35812
[email protected] Phone: +1 256 961 4758Mobile Phone: +1 256 541 8534Fax: +1 256 961 0737
19
Contact Information
Tanya W. Komas, Ph.D.Founding Director/CEO, Concrete Preservation InstituteAlcatraz Island, CA & Pearl Harbor, HI
Mailing address:1380 East Avenue, Suite 124-385Chico, CA 95926
[email protected] Phone: +1 866 415 7691 x701Mobile Phone: +1 530 514 4341
20
Contact Information
James E. Alleman, Ph.D.Joel and Judy Cerwick Professor of Environmental EngineeringJefferson Science Fellow (US State Department)
Mailing address:Iowa State University – CCEE DepartmentRm. 420 – Town EngineeringAmes, Iowa 50011-3232
[email protected] Phone: +1 515 294-3892Mobile Phone: +1 515 441 2411
21